The US controls Venezuelan oil and has blockaded Iranian oil.
The US has blockaded the Strait of Hormuz. About 50% of China's oil came through this strait.
The US has established a security agreement with the Indonesia. About 80% of China's oil travels through Indonesian Straits.
The US has eliminated the cheap oil to China from Iran and Venezuela.
The US controls the shipping lanes for about 80% of China's oil supplies.
These actions weakens the BRICS.
The world runs on oil. Control of the majority of the world's oil supply ensures oil is purchased with US dollars. 
The petrodollar insures dominance of the US dollar as the world's reserve currency.

The US controls Venezuelan&nbsp;oil and has blockaded Iranian&nbsp;oil. The US has blockaded the Strait of Hormuz. About&nbsp;50% of China's oil&nbsp;came through&nbsp;this strait. The US has established a&nbsp;security agreement with the Indonesia. About 80% of China's&nbsp;oil travels through Indonesian Straits. The US has eliminated the cheap oil to China from Iran and Venezuela. The US controls the shipping lanes for about 80% of China's oil supplies. These actions weakens the BRICS. The world runs on oil. Control of the majority of the world's oil supply ensures oil is purchased with US dollars.&nbsp; The petrodollar insures dominance&nbsp;of the US dollar as the world's reserve currency.

Your Personal Bank is a powerful financial tool often used by banks, corporations, and the wealthy.


No other financial vehicle comes close to giving you the advantages of a properly structured and maintained Your Personal Bank policy. The Your Personal Bank concept is often misunderstood by many people, including most legal, tax, and financial advisors. Lack of information and improperly structured policies are frequently the cause. 

Your Personal Bank is a powerful financial tool often used by banks, corporations, and the wealthy.
 No other financial vehicle comes close to giving you the advantages of a properly structured and maintained Your Personal Bank policy. The Your Personal Bank concept is often misunderstood by many people, including most legal, tax, and financial advisors. Lack of information and improperly structured policies are frequently the cause.

Your Personal Bank

Control of the Oil Supply Ensures the US Dollar Dominates as the World's Reserve Currency

The US Supreme Court ruled that states can no longer use race to draw congressional districts. 20-30 house seats are represented by districts drawn to represent minorities. 

The court ruled this violated the Equal Protection Clause and the civil rights of the majority of voters. Democrats have benefited for decades with these congressional districts. 

This is a massive change in political power that will likely benefit the Republicans for decades.

The Virginia Supreme Court stopped the new district map that would have likely changed Virginia's house representation from 6 democrats and 5 republicans to 10 democrats and 1 republican. 

Virginia is a purple state. They had a very popular republican governor a few months ago. Kamala Harris won Virginia by about 5% in 2024. The ballot initiative barely passed. 51% of voters would have disenfranchised 49% of voters. 

Florida recently passed a redistrict effort that will likely increase republican representation by about 4 seats. Florida's redistricting would have off-set Virginia. Millions have moved to Florida since the last Census. Florida had a reason to redistrict other than purely political power, unlike Virginia.

Both parties gerrymander. The democrats have been far more aggressive for decades. The 6 New England states average 42% republican voters. Due to gerrymandering, New England has zero Republican House representatives. New England Republicans have no representation in the US House of Representatives. 

The US Supreme Court ruled that states can no longer use race to draw congressional districts. 20-30 house seats are represented by districts drawn to represent minorities.&nbsp;
The court ruled this violated the Equal Protection Clause and the civil rights of the majority of voters. Democrats have benefited for decades with these congressional districts.&nbsp;
This is a massive change in political power that will likely benefit the Republicans for decades.
The Virginia Supreme Court stopped the new district map that would have likely changed Virginia's house representation from 6 democrats and 5 republicans to 10 democrats and 1 republican.&nbsp;
Virginia is a purple state. They had a very popular republican governor a few months ago. Kamala Harris won Virginia by about 5% in 2024. The ballot initiative barely passed. 51% of voters would have disenfranchised 49% of voters.&nbsp;
Florida recently passed a redistrict effort that will likely increase republican representation by about 4 seats. Florida's redistricting would have off-set Virginia. Millions have moved to Florida since the last Census. Florida had a reason to redistrict other than purely political power, unlike Virginia.
Both parties gerrymander. The democrats have been far more aggressive for decades. The 6 New England states average 42% republican voters. Due to gerrymandering, New England has zero Republican House representatives. New England Republicans have no representation in the US House of Representatives.&nbsp;

 US Supreme Court Decision will Massively Change the US House of Representatives

Two things have caused me to be concerned about conditions that could lead to the Next Civil War.Hope it does not happen. Not encouraging violence. Using common sense, historical insight, human behavior.
1.Virginia redistricting   - Everyone gerrymanders   - 51% disenfranchised 49% of voters in VA   - New England averages 42% republicans, yet only one republican out of 33 House districts    - New Mexico: 46% republican, but no republican representatives   - No taxation without representation primary cause of Revolutionary War   - Disenfranchised voters become disillusioned, frustrated, or worse 
2. Democrat action plan    - Obama: recent donor meeting promised one party rule by 2029    - James Carville: former Clinton advisor        - Recommend if Democrats win House, Senate, and President:        - Make DC and Puerto Rico states to add 4 Senators        - Stack the Supreme Court        - Purpose: long-term one party rule         - "Let them eat our dust"
Permanent one party rule - Antithesis of Constitution and Representative Republic - Defies 250 years of tradition - Fight for the soul of the nation
Solution: States Rights - States are republics - States created federal republic, not the other way around - If states become disenfranchised by stacked Senate and packed Supreme Court, may stop federal overreach
If Democrats succeed with one-party rule think California economy - The battle will be chaotic - Uncertainty creates volatility
One type of financial company has thrived in all economies long-term - Several companies have paid dividends every year before the Civil War - Ferenc shares info on products that have thrived long-term
Contact Ferenc at ferenc@yourpersonalbank or 866-268-4422 for more info.

Two things have caused me to be concerned about conditions that could lead to the Next Civil War.Hope it does not happen. Not encouraging violence. Using common sense, historical insight, human behavior. 1.Virginia redistricting&nbsp; &nbsp;- Everyone gerrymanders&nbsp; &nbsp;- 51% disenfranchised&nbsp;49% of voters in VA&nbsp; &nbsp;- New England averages 42% republicans, yet only one republican out of 33 House districts&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;- New Mexico: 46% republican, but no republican representatives&nbsp; &nbsp;- No taxation without representation&nbsp;primary cause of Revolutionary War&nbsp; &nbsp;- Disenfranchised voters become disillusioned, frustrated, or worse&nbsp; 2. Democrat action plan&nbsp; &nbsp; - Obama: recent donor meeting promised one party rule by 2029&nbsp; &nbsp; - James Carville: former Clinton advisor&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; - Recommend if Democrats win House, Senate, and President:&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; - Make DC and Puerto Rico states to add 4 Senators&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; - Stack the Supreme Court&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; - Purpose: long-term one party rule&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; - "Let them eat our dust" Permanent&nbsp;one party rule&nbsp;- Antithesis&nbsp;of Constitution and Representative Republic&nbsp;- Defies 250 years of tradition&nbsp;- Fight for the soul of the nation Solution: States Rights&nbsp;- States are republics&nbsp;- States created federal republic, not the other way around&nbsp;- If states become disenfranchised by stacked Senate and packed Supreme Court, may stop federal overreach If Democrats succeed with one-party rule think California economy&nbsp;- The battle will be chaotic&nbsp;- Uncertainty&nbsp;creates volatility One type of financial company has thrived in all economies long-term&nbsp;- Several companies have paid dividends every year before the Civil War&nbsp;- Ferenc shares info on products that have thrived long-term Contact Ferenc at ferenc@yourpersonalbank or 866-268-4422 for more info.

The Conditions for the Next Civil War are Being Put in Place

When negotiating a salary or a raise, most people don't know what they are up against.
Many companies purchase data from payroll processors and other sources to optimize salary expenses.
This info often includes previous job incomes and what increases you recieved. The info obtained by companies include address changes, credit card utilization, delinquent debt, and past due balances. This data aggregation determines the lowest salary you will accept. 
The salary offered is typically about 3-6% above your minimum number. This is just enough to feel like you are negotiating.
Veena Dubai, a law professor, completed extensive research on algorithmic wage discrimination and found that when many employers in the same market use the same data vendors, it creates price-fixing of labor.
The company has the advantage with all the data. They know what you will settle for. You think you are negotiating. The system even accounts for your counter in advance.
You think your salary is based on the position; your knowledge and experience. It isn't. It is based on your desperation.
Salary optimization requires information. The primary source is a product called the Work Number. You can contact Equifax and freeze your info. 
Take back control of your personal info, freeze your info and maybe even your salary negotiations!

When negotiating a salary or a raise, most people don't know what they are up against. Many companies purchase data from payroll processors and other sources&nbsp;to optimize salary expenses. This info often includes previous job&nbsp;incomes and what increases you recieved. The info obtained by companies include address changes, credit card utilization, delinquent&nbsp;debt, and past due balances. This data aggregation&nbsp;determines the lowest salary you will accept.&nbsp; The salary offered is typically about 3-6% above your minimum number. This is just enough to feel like you are negotiating. Veena Dubai, a law professor, completed extensive research on algorithmic&nbsp;wage discrimination and found that when&nbsp;many employers in the same market use the same data vendors, it creates price-fixing of labor. The company has the advantage with all the data. They know what you will settle for. You think you are negotiating. The system even accounts for your counter in advance. You think your salary is based on the position; your knowledge and experience. It isn't. It is based on your desperation. Salary optimization requires information. The primary source is a product called the Work Number. You can contact Equifax and freeze your info.&nbsp; Take back control of your personal info, freeze your info and maybe even your salary negotiations!

Control of the Oil Supply Ensures the US Dollar Dominates as the World's Reserve Currency

In 1 playlist(s)

Your Personal Bank

Social links

Follow podcast

Recent clips