The Herd with Colin CowherdColin talks to NBA Commissioner Adam Silver about their reported decline in TV ratings and if the 3-point line needs to be pushed further back
Thanks for listening to The Herd podcast. Be sure to catch us live every weekday on Fox Sports Radio in noon to three Eastern nine am to noon Pacific. Find your local station for The Herd at Fox Sports Radio dot com, or stream us live every day on the iHeartRadio app by searching Fox Sports Radio or FSR.
You're listening to Fox Sports Radio.
All right, here we go. It's our two. Been waiting for this for a long time, live in Los Angeles. It is The Herd. Wherever you may be and however you may be listening, Thanks for making us part of your day. You know, I used to have a relationship at the other Place with David Stern, the late Great Commissioner David Stern, who was the boss of Adam Silver. And it was always funny because he would join me during his lunch and he was always eating during the interview, which I made sure he knew that I knew. But the interviews were feisty and fun. And so I've been looking forward to this because the NBA is still in probably culturally relevant, and they just signed contracts with networks for seventy seven billion dollars, and they do get beat up a lot because let's be honest. Their star players are often bigger than NFL players, So there's a lot to unravel and unpack here when we bring on Adam Silver, eleven years as the NBA commissioner, So let's start with the good stuff. International expansion, China and Africa. You have a new CBA for seven years. You just signed a massive TV deal. I like the NBA Cup. I'm a distracted consumer. If the court's purple, I know it matters. I like it. I think it works. So there's a lot of good here, more good than bad. But I'm gonna I'm gonna set this question up because this is something I struggle with. I'm a consumer and I'm distracted. I'm on my phone as much as TV. So I have been watching Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese. They feel like burden magic because I am viscerally connected to them via college. This is why studios do sequels. I know the actors. Zach I really like watching him plays, having a very nice rookie season. But I know him because Matt Painter and Purdue is a big time program. It would be reductionist to say he's succeeding because he's big he's succeeding because of what Purdue did, and not only that commissioner, but I got to watch the growth. So I am emotionally committed to Zach Edy. I think your heart was in the right place with a G League, but it hides players from me that I want to grow with. Is there an argument to be made that college basketball there's I feel like it's not that it's marginalized, but it's not as big as it could be. It could be such a micro wave for your stars, and the league doesn't see it that way. Is that a fair criticism.
I don't think it's a fair criticism because we do see it that way and we're doing everything we can to build college basketball. I mean, let me take a few steps back. Like, first of all, in terms of the G League, most of the G League players are either international players who didn't play in college or former college players. In fact, we had a program called Team McKnight Condaly s Rice recommended we create. There was an NCAA commission and you'll recall pre collectives and nil money. President Obama criticized us, and then the NCAA had a commission and said there should be a track a pro track into the NBA because it was unfair that the only opportunity for these young players was to play without being paid in college. So we had already had the G League, but then we created this program called Team McKnight where for a select few high school players, if they wanted the opportunity to get to get paid and then come into the NBA, they could play in that program. But even then we recognized that compared to the facilities the conditions at the top D one programs, even though we were paying them and they couldn't have been paid at that point, it was they were still better off playing at Kentucky or Louisville or Duke or USC or wherever else. And so once the NIL and collective money came in, we actually shut down the Team ig Night. We still have the G League, and the last thing we want to do is take top prospects would otherwise be going to school.
Take Cooper Flag at Duke. We'd rather he.
Be there than be playing in the NBA right now or be playing in the G League.
We want those players to develop.
So you know, I think there's a misnomer to the extent that you or others feel that we're not supportive of college basketball and personally a huge college basketball fan. I'm Charlie Baker, the former governor of Massachusetts and now head of the CUBA.
He and I have been meeting a lot.
To talk about collectively what we can do to better develop young American players, which clearly has to begin before they get to college.
For the NBA.
So and you know, we are the league of the w MBA too, and so I pay a lot of attention to Caitlyn Clark and the star players that are emerging and the WNBA and who are coming from college and when whether it's Angel or Caitlin or Juju now and these players come into the w NBA as you know, built fully, you know, multi dimensional stars that people are familiar with like it was in the old days in the NBA.
We love that.
The problem is, like so many things in life, I'm not sure we can turn the clock back on that type of development.
I will say it's positive, you know.
Putting aside, I think there's some issues that need to be addressed in terms of the NIL system and the collectives. It seems like nobody's really happy with it right now. In terms of the competitive landscape, I think it's positive that those players are able to be paid, and if they're able to be paid, particular, the players that aren't are on the margin of whether they or not they would be lottery picks or first round draft picks. They now have a huge incentive to stay in school because they can. They're not only can get the further development, but they can get paid as well.
Here's something that I addressed with David Stern, and I'll address it with you too. I think trades are good for sports. If you look at the best teams in the NBA right now, Oklahoma City, Cleveland, and Boston, they have smart front offices that have drafted and developed well. They can occasionally make a Donovan Mitchell move or Porzingis move, or a Drew Holliday, but those teams have drafted and developed well and they're being rewarded for it. You know, Dallas drafted Luca. You know they can go get Kyrie, but lucas the star. The NBA gets a little too caught up if you take Lebron out. Let's just take Lebron out. He is the historic outlier. Even Kevin Durant, Warriors one before him, Warriors one after him, is that I think the league sometimes is too concerned with trades. If Jimmy Butler, who's a good player, maybe not a superstar anymore, went to Oklahoma City, I would want to watch them more, or Golden State, I would want to that the league sometimes to protect the small markets. Let's not worry too much about that. Let's just let players move because the sense that it ruins the league or creates a competitive balance outside of Lebron, it really doesn't. Most of the great teams in this league historically have always been draft and develop, build a core, and then add sprinkle in some good players via trades.
I don't think it's an accident that we've had six different teams over the last six years that have won championships, and at the end of the day, we sell competition. And I hear you it sounds like you're making an argument for dynasties to a certain extent, that we should do more to allow a great player to go to an already great team or an already very good team. The problem is that it's zero sum. The players are going to go somewhere. That's the great news. All the top tier players are going to play in the NBA and that there is a correlation. It's far from perfect, but there's a correlation between what players make and their performance on the floor. And so what we've done, and I understand your point of view over time is while we have a soft cap system, it's become harder and it has been more difficult once you have a fully loaded team. Then add a great player on top of that. And to your point, if Kevin Durant couldn't have gone to Golden State from Oklahoma City when he did, the team he had gone to would have almost by definition, if it weren't already a great team, would have become a great team. And for us, we think that's better league wide in terms of creating more competition. I mean, we're coming off a season last year and it's continued this year. Or I think we have more competitive teams than any time in league history. And to your point, the fact that tomorrow night Cleveland and Oklahoma City are playing yet again, you know, fantastic build up for that game, incredible competition. We just got to remember at the end of the day, that's what we're selling. I mean, I think that's part of the reason for the enormous success of the NFL. This any given Sunday notion, nobody thinks twice. If you know the Packers are in the super Bowl, there's no bemoaning that it's a small market whatsoever. And I think our league, it's true that if you look back on you know, the first you know, sixty years of our league. It seemed David Stern joked, you know when when he came into the league, I thought the job was you went back and forth from Boston to.
La every year, and one of the team's got the rings, you know.
And I think the fact that now we're selling competition in every market, and that in terms of from a television standpoint too, that you know, whether it's Oklahoma City, whether it's San Antonio, whether it's Salt Lake City, that those teams are in a position when well managed to compete in the same way the large markets can. And by the way, I mean it's not just money. I mean players choose markets based on you know, climate taxes, Some like big cities, some like small cities. But you know, I think I'm balanced. This is a much better system for a thirty team league.
Throw this at you. I said this the other day about the esthetic of the NBA. It's a bit homogenoust, a little cookie cutter. And I said, listen, I don't mind three pointers. But if the NFL was just you could run the ball and throw bombs. No layering, no drag routes, no tight end screen, it was just run it or bombs. Optically, it's not as fascinating. And I love the three pointer, but like and you know this, you're a pretty progressive thinking. I think athletes are better. Wemby can pull up and cross you over on a dribble and shoot. They couldn't do that ten years ago. And the truth is, because your players are so gifted and it's such a global pool, the three pointer is too easy. And I have simply said I would put the three pointer. I would go have it go into the bench about six feet up, eliminate the corner. I'd bring back the handcheck. I do like physicality. Your athletes are so great it's become too easy to hit it, and the optics on it are a repetitive. I think there's numbers ratings that prove people are they they like layers and power forwards and physicality and not just dunks and threes. What do you do to solve that, because I think you've engaged with people and acknowledged it can be a bit repetitive. It is a bit of an issue. What do we do to change it?
That the hardest question is the last one you asked, what do we do to change it? I agree to the extent that you start to see very similar offenses. Yes, around the league. You know, teams have brands, teams have identity. You know, Joe Dumars is a colleague now at the league office, the Bad Boys, et cetera. You know, I think you know the Showtime Lakers. So I recognize that's the extent that offenses start to look very similar. We lose that. At the same time, the league is going through a transformation. Just as you said, players like Victor Webbin Yama, players like you know Yokich are doing things big men never did historically. I mean, it wasn't that long ago, Colin. You'll remember that conversations you had with David Stern. We would bemoan the lack of skill among some players that you know there there was a sense there was too much physicality. Yes, that the play under the back, you know that you would have you know, the hack a shack era. You know, there were big men that just couldn't shoot free throws. There are no big men anymore who can't shoot many throws, just as one comparable from generation to generation have never been higher.
So I think we just got to be careful.
Like the one thing I want to do is I don't want to sort of knee jerk move the three point line. We're sort of going through a process now seeing how these players are adapting to the new rules and figuring out if whatever changes we should make. I mean, be honest, I wish it were as simple as just moving the three point line back, because then we would just do it. I mean, part of the concern from the basketball folks is that if you move the three point line back, you'll end up sort of just clogging up, you know, the sort of the area under the basket, and that's not such attractive basketball either.
I think this is doable.
I think we by examining the game and sort of seeing where it's going. I mean, it frustrates me a little as well, because it's it's obviously you're representative of how what a fair number of people are saying about the game.
And I watch it.
Night and night out, and we're seeing some of the most incredible athleticism and skill in the history of this league.
Again Victor wm Banyama.
But I think you're also saying too that if we moved the three point line back and what we ended up with was Victor when Banyama standing under the basket the whole time, just waiting you're done, that wouldn't be interesting either. So you know, one, I assure you we are on it. I think it's a very fixable issue. I mean, it's you know, we've gone from I mean I always tell the story like Bob Coosey, who I don't know, he's around ninety five years old, still stays in touch with me, and he'll call me after watching a game and say, I'm so frustrated because the commentators think that what these players are doing, let's say, from twenty eight feet or thirty feet and seemingly just flicking the ball up with their wrists and swishing these three pointers, that somehow that's easy. They said, the skill level is incredible. But he'll also say, you know, I think we all want to see diversity in the offenses. But by the way, one other thing I'll just throw in I don't think the players are getting enough credit for playing the style defense they're playing now as well.
So it's an incredible game. I know you love the game.
It's, you know, the number one participation sport in the United States.
You mentioned Kaitlyn Clark. It's incredible to.
See what the women are now doing on the floor and the amount of young girls who are playing this game. So as stewards of the game, you know Joe Dumar's leads our competition committee here, you know we will tweak it, we will correct those issues.
So years ago I had a President Barack Obama on a couple of times, and one of the things I offered him, I said, you're the first president in my life that's had the deal with social media and the vile nature of it. It may not change policy, but does it change the discussions in the briefing rooms before you go out. Does it change the way perhaps you think of policy. Because we're in a tribal nation, it's very loud. So along those lines, I love George Brett as a baseball player. As a kid Kansas City Royals, George Brett often missed thirty games in a season. Nobody thought it was load management. Right, we live in a different time. Platforms call it out and tickets are more expensive, so it does bother me. I'm a small town kid. I went once a year to see downtown Freddie Brown, Gus Williams, Dennis Johnson, Jack Sikma. If they didn't play, that was the game I got. And I can see that little kid in Milwaukee, middle class family go and Yannis could play, but he doesn't. Is it a bigger problem? I think it's a problem. Do you view it as being sort of platformed up by loud voices or does the league look at this and think, you know, our middle class fans they go to one game a year, they're not corporate stewards, and that they want to go and see their stars play. I think it's serious. Do you in the league think it is a problem that is something you want to solve.
We so much think it's a problem that in the last collective bargaining agreement you may recall, we added some provisions to further incentivized players to play as many games as they possibly can by making them ineligible for certain awards, certain benefits if they fall below a certain level of games. Having said that to your point, you know, and I'm never going to shoot the messenger in terms of whether it's social media or the media.
It's a real issue.
And how can you know for that family for that one time that they're going to go see the box or the Lakers or the Knicks or whatever else. I completely understand their point of view. The problem is as much as we are an eighty two game league. I mean take Lebron for example. Lebron has missed i think three games so far this season. He's forty years old, he has the most minutes in NBA history, and he's missed i think three out of let's say thirty seven games so far.
I think that's incredible.
Now, for the family that went to the Laker game of one of those three games, I understand their disappointment, and I know he does as well. You know, it's with it with its season as long as we have, by the way, and whether it's because load management or an injury, it's still the same impact on that family. And all I can say is we've worked with our teams. We're working a lot on the science. I think, incidentally, you don't hear load management so much around the league anymore because I think we've dispelled that notion that it's somehow through some analytics or a computer program that on November twelfth, you can make a decision that a player should sit out on December twentieth, which is what was going on in the league, and in fact, my understanding, at least of the data that's come in so far, it may even be the case that some of the early early season injuries are caused by players not having enough load. Because even than you again, you know, it's fascinating, Like when I got to the league a little over thirty years ago, a lot of players would take the month of August and like literally go fishing.
You know.
They would show out and they would they would like eat a little bit more, gain a little bit of weight. They'd come into training camp and that's when you got back into shape and you'd lose those pounds and you'd play your way and and and train and practice back into game shape. Now there's not there's hardly a player in the league that isn't working out every single day. Guys even go to the finals, they take a day off, they're back on the floor. But often it's specialized one on one training. It's weight room work, whatever it is, it's not five on five basketball because and a lot of it in fairness, these players, and that's what frustrates me too, because they don't take a day off. There's some of the hardest working athletes out there, but then they have it in their head that they're more likely to get injured if they're playing five on five. So yeah, right, So then they come back into training camp and it's still not necessarily five on five. There's the preseason again, minutes are limited. Then boom, the regular season comes and at least I can't say it's perfect. I know it's causation yet, but there's certainly correlation early in the season that you see those guys.
And it's interesting.
It used to be we would hear from teams that you're going to injure our players if they play for USA Basketball, the US national team, the Olympic team, or the national teams you know, from the countries they're from. In fact, it's the opposite. We have fewer injuries and maybe not surprisingly from the guys who participate in competition over the summer because the load is maintained.
They're not overdoing it, you know, I mean, I I but.
You know, they come back and there's the consistency of the load, you know, throughout the off season. So I think this is an area too where better data, you know, AI is changing everything where we're going to be in a position, I think where we can convince the teams and convince the players that actually playing is in their interest. But unfortunately we're never going to be able to completely solve that issue for that family that comes to that game and is disappointed. I will say, just lastly, it maybe speaks a little bit to the data that we're coming off. Last year in the entire history of the NBA, it was our highest attendance and I'm sure I mean that market no doubt the.
Highest ticket prices too.
So I will say, yes, they're fans disappointed, but people love the NBA experience, they love going to the games. I understand when there's a particular star you're interested. But also we've never been deeper in terms of the talent to four hund and fifty players in the league.
Okay, I'm gonna ask you a couple quick ones because I know you're a busy guy, much busier than me, and these can these can require shorter answers. So one of the things the iPhone has changed everything. Our society is more caffeinated, more distracted, and more frenetic. Hockey regular season, baseball regular season, NBA regular season. It's just harder to get ratings. Events UFC on Saturday, college football, NFL, Olympics, World Cup events get excellent ratings. It's not necessarily the fault of a league if there's a decline in Monday through Friday. And as I look and read stories about the decline of ratings, my take is it's an iPhone issue. It's not baseball. Until Otawni and the Dodgers put up basically the best most talented team ever, the Dodgers had great ratings. Is that Can you just is it just possible that, hey, we have contracts that limit the number of games we can be reduced to. We don't want to make one and done, like college basketball? Is it your regular season ratings? They don't matter that much because I just saw your new TV deals and that the media makes a bigger deal of the truth is we're good when it matters in May and June, and that's just a new world.
Yeah, you asked me to answer shorter, So I'll try to be There's so much that could be set on this. So first of all, this season, just to set the record straight, we're up about four percent on ESPN and ABC. If you had TNT into the mix, we're down slightly three or four percent for this season. That's our rating story so far. We're coming off last season where it was our highest regular season ratings in four years. But the issue is especially for a sport like the NBA where we have a very young fan base young men, yes, young women, cable as you know, and I'm sure it has an impact on your show as well that since you last interviewed me, you know, five plus years, there's been yet another dramatic increase in the number of people who subscribe i'll call traditional television, cable, satellite television, or who watch traditional television, so much so that from a decade ago, it's like fifty percent fewer people watch traditional television. In fact, last year the lines crossed. More people are now watching programming on streaming services than they are through legacy conventional television.
So back to the iPhone.
So those deals you talked about that we just entered into for next year. Part of the reason I believe, in addition to the sport itself, that we're able to provide so much value. Is every one of those new partners Disney and ESPN, NBC, Universal, Peacock, and of course Amazon provide their games through streaming. Maybe in the case of NBC it's also broadcast or Disney, ABC and ESPN. But every single game beginning next season is going to be available on a streaming service for and then you burden on or onus, on us then that we know, now there's the opportunity to watch this programming on those screens on those TVs they carry everywhere they go. But I think as a result, we have to up our game too. So they're adding more games of consequences, the colored floors you joked about before for the NBA Cup, So that gets people's attention. But beyond that, they really exciting thing to me about moving to streaming services, which are in essence internet television. You can add all kinds of incredible functionality, customization, personalization. People want to bet on games, they can do it. People want to buy merchandise, they're fascinated with a particular camera angle, or they want an audio feed that is directed at hardcore fans or casual fans. So I think, and this isn't just the case for the NBA, I think for all of the leagues that the competition is that much greater than it used to be, and so we have to do a better job engaging our fans in these games.
Okay, I promise. I know your PR people are probably saying, get cowered out of here.
I can ignore them, thank you.
Okay, there's another one. So this really bothers Jason McIntyre. I think he really has been on this for two years. He's been very publicly critical of Barkley banging on the league. And my take is just I'll cut to the chase. Have you ever called that show's executives or Charles and said, Charles, could could you not beat down on us every night? That there are those that believe it takes a negative tact or tone on a fairly consistent basis. I don't think it affects the ratings. I think their entertainment show, but I don't see the research you do. Have you contacted them at one point and said you guys are a little negative.
Never ever, ever, and the only contact I've ever had with them, and it would have been with Ernie. It's occasionally Ernie and I will talk and he'll say, we're going to be discussing some aspect of the salary cap or you know, the CBA, and it'll like, just give me a primer on what the rules are so that if somebody says something that is factually wrong, I'm in a position to correct them. But so that's just on facts, never on opinion. And I'll go one step further. I mean, as you know, you know, we we didn't continue our relationship with Turner Sports that produces inside the NBA, but we just got a deal done with ESPN and Turner Sports to move that very show to ESPN and ABC.
And I'll go further.
And I love Jason by the way, Jason, thank you for being a fan that I think in this case, they are unique. I think sometimes others who are more critical I won't say names, but we'll get our equivalent of you or mail and people say, why is this guy commentation or announcing on the NBA when it seems that he doesn't even like the league. And I think that's a fair point if you think somebody is that negative. And to me, there's always a tradition in the NFL where almost all the announcers to me seem to celebrate the game in the case in the case of that panel, Charles Kenny Shack, of course, Ernie, I always have the sense that when they are critical, it's your uncle at the Thanksgiving Day table. You know this is it's it's the family. They have the credibility. And because I also hear I don't call them, but I hear from players in the league or teams in the league, or say ah, like there are partner like why are they saying those things? And I think Charles is specially by the way, there's a reason that show has won close to I think two dozen Emmys, and and so I think it generates more interest in the league, and to the extent that next year that show will be featured on ESPN and ABC and more people will have the opportunity to see it.
I think that's very positive for the league.
Well, this was fun, and I do appreciate you not eating during the interview, because I loved David, but it was a tuna sandwich every time he came on.
With me, and I was his favorite.
Yeah, I found that I discovered that over several years. A real pleasure. If you're ever in La, I'd love to have you. I think this kind of stuff is important. I like the poking prad and I just appreciate you answering the questions.
Yeah, Colin, and I wish I had asked this at the top of the interview. How are you guys doing everything that's going on out there?
I gotta tell you, it's the most devastating thing I've ever seen. Los Angeles, as you know, is a community with a very diverse community. People come here and chase their dreams, and it feels like a lot of dreams have been shattered by a lot of really great people in a lot of industries. But I have seen giving at a level that is heartwarming from outside of Los Angeles, and in Los Angeles people have opened their doors. Very encouraging by citizens of Los Angeles.
Yeah, I'll to say, you know, I was just with some of the Lakers and Clippers executives at some meetings, and first of all, I think, you know, the Clippers into at Dome. We're going to do you know, a huge concert with the azof family, Yes, money, you know. In addition, you know, I've been on the phone with JJ Reddick. Of course he lost his house. He explained to me how the community center, the rec center where his.
Son was playing, burns the ground.
So the league is going to come up with a program with the Lakers and Clippers to help rebuild the community. So you know, again, the images are just terrific from the East coast. I'm very sorry.
Yeah, terrifying, But there's a lot of really good people in this state, in the city. Adam Silver, the commissioner of the NBA, who presides, by the way over five different sports leagues a sports League, NBA W NBA G League, NBA two K Basketball after league, thank you so much for taking time for us. You I told before this show, I said, listen, we can I get eighteen minutes. You gave us twenty nine. I am indebted and thank you so much.
Yeah, my pleasure. Thank you, all right. J Mack.
I waited to the end to ask the question about Charles Barkley. I kept watching you, but I did ask that question. Adam Silver, thank you so much for joining us on the show. So probably one a little longer than his handlers wanted, but you know what, I thought, we got some substantive stuff out there and I appreciate it and thanks to you. If you watched it, I hope you enjoyed it, and we'll put it on you know, archives and stuff like that. We got to take a break back in a second live in LA.
It's the Herd one More Heard. The Herd streams twenty four hours a day, seven days a week within the iHeartRadio app. Search Herd to listen live or on demand whenever you like.
So we just had Adam Silver on a lot of things that were addressed. You know, it's interesting with the NBA. One of the things I have said is people that don't even like the NBA often to the loudest critics of the NBA. And that's just that's the reality. But I see people having strong opinions on politics and they just they don't really know it or care that much. But that a lot of people want to stir the pot, get click stuff.
I get it.
But I also think there are fundamental things about the NBA. I think there are too many three pointers. I think college basketball like is so valuable for the NBA. I mean, there's an argument to be made that the more popular your number one minor league system is the more popular you are. NFL's number one. That's because college football is the number one amateur feeder system. NBA is second, college basketball second, most popular, Baseball's third, Baseball, college baseball third, and then college hockey is very niche in hockey's four. Now, I don't know if those go hand in hand, but I do think in my opinion, and we address this, I think college basketball is incredibly valuable. Why in the world would I care about Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese because of their college experience. It feels very magic inverted me. I watched Larry Burden Indiana State and Magic Johnson and Michigan State play so like to me, Zachy he's a prime example if you had just gone to the G League out of Purdue one year. I don't have any relationship with him. I mean, I'm still watching Ion and he drives me nuts because of Duke. It's not just because he's finally this year in better shape. It's because he went to Duke and a shoe exploded and Nike in the So I think college sports is just a great great It's free. It's like the best thing for your health is free water. The best thing for Pro Sports is that minor league system that advertises Baker Mayfield. So we have strong opinions about Baker Pro or con. I mean, Baker Mayfield made a lot of money because he's a villain to some, because he's overrated to some. So I think he addressed those and the other thing that we have to admit this is that in a more distracted nation, it is harder to get ratings for virtually everybody Monday through Thursday, Monday through Friday, it's hard. I mean, the NFL's ratings are down this year. Why they've added more games, Seriously, that's why I don't like the NFL expanding college football. The playoff numbers have been a little lower than people thought. Why they put the games on Thursday and Friday because they didn't want to compete against the NFL. So the college football playoff ratings were lower than people expected. What we do as a nation now is we watch events. We're very distracted on our phones. So UFC Saturday Night, College Football, Saturday Night, NFL Sunday and Monday, World Cup, Olympics, or if you get a phenom like Otani or Caitlin Clark, that will move us to Monday through Friday viewing, but even college football, you put it on like Thursday and Friday. This year, big brands like Ohio State brand, that kind of brand, Oregon brand. Now the numbers are a little soft or softer than you'd expect. So I do think there's a reality. No league is perfect. NFL is a prime example. I think they become so quarterback centric. The bottom of the league, the bottom twelve teams are hard to watch. If you don't have a good quarterback, you're not even competitive. That was never the case. There'd be like four three or four bad teams. Now there's like twelve because the league is so quarterback centric. So I think that's a real issue, is that you have a very finite number of great teams, same teams every year, Baltimore, Buffalo, Kansas City, Philadelphia, a very tiny middle class, and then an expanding bottom that's hard to watch. So all leagues have issues, and like the NFL is a little down this year, college football numbers are a little down. A lot of that is because we've expanded games in pro football, we've added more games in college football, and we're more distracted. It is not easy to get me on a Tuesday or a Wednesday night to sit down and watch anything, because I know my weekends are going to be packed and my wife, I'm not gonna say, hey, honey, I'm gonna watch sports all weekend, like like you have to pick and choose now, right, And so Sunday for me is the day Saturday. I got a couple of games I gotta watch. You know, there will be occasional NBA games, but I'm mostly I get on the treadmill at four in the afternoon so I can watch East Coast games every day. Starting in about two weeks, I'll start doing my four thirty viewing on the old treadmill. But Americans, if you don't have an event, feel to it less and less. It's harder to cultivate gigantic audiences. So, and all the leagues are making money. Hockey a couple of years ago signed a mega deal and their TV ratings aren't very good, right, So the leagues are filling the bandwidth here. They're all making money. That's not the issue. And for the record, the NBA ratings are up in an election year. So the NFL ratings are down this year. Why because of the election. Our ratings were soft in September and October. Why because of the election we've had the last three or four last couple of weeks, people are over politics. Boom, the ratings go up. So this is an election year. There's a lot of distractions in the NFL expand the season election year numbers teeter just a little bit, and all leagues have issues. But I think we are lucky, and I say this all the time. Here's where we are lucky as consumers. So few of our great America star athlete NBA Baseball, basketball, hockey. I meet young people all the time. I remember, they're just mostly great kids. I was with my wife in a hotel about a six months ago. I don't know when it was. It was the start of the NBA season and all the New York Knicks were staying at the hotel and I'm sitting there with my wife and all of a sudden, NBA player in this hotel jumps in the elevator, the kid that got traded to Toronto from the Knicks. Really nice kid, Barrett R. J. Barrett jumps on the elevator. He could not have been nicer, more thoughtful. And he got off the elevator and my wife is like, are all athletes that nice? And I'm like, you'd be shocked. And then this past weekend, I'm in Chicago two weekends ago and Zach Levine was at a restaurant. I was that, now Jmack loves Zach Levine. I've been a little critical and Zach Levine and they hear everything. It could not have been nicer. And my wife got very me. She goes uh. I said I'd been kind of critical of him before, and she said, no more being critical of nice people. So the new rule on the show is, I said, honey, you've never heard our show before, apparently, But the point being is I didn't even recognize Christian McCaffrey in a UFC fight, and my wife admonished me and said, why is that guy on the screen and everybody cheering. That's the guy that you blew off in the media room. And I said, oh it is Christian McCaffrey was wearing a hat. I couldn't tell, So my wife made me get up from the seat go in find him in the media room. The point being is I meet pro athletes all the time, and they're overwhelmingly good people. They could be I mean, these kids are rich this, they're famous. They We're very lucky. We are all very lucky. There are so many star athletes with so many options, and overwhelmingly when I see him, when I meet him, when I hear about it, they do good things. They give the charity, they're helpful people, they're good.
In the community.
All right, I'm off my soapbox. We take a break back live. It's The Herd in LA.
You want to catch live editions of The Herd weekdays at noon eastern nine am Pacific on Fox Sports Radio FS one and the iHeartRadio app.
Hey, Steve Covino and I'm Rich David and together we're Covino and Rich on Fox Sports Radio.
You could catch us weekdays from five to seven pm Eastern two to four Pacific on Fox Sports Radio and of course the iHeartRadio App.
Why should you listen to Covino and Rich.
We talk about everything life, sports, relationships, what's.
Going on in the world.
We have a lot of fun talking about the stories behind the stories in the world of sports and pop culture, stories that well, other shows don't seem to have the time to discuss.
And the fact that we've been friends for the last twenty years and still work together. I mean that says something.
Right, So check us out.
We like to get you involved too, take your phone calls, chop it up. As they say, I'd say, the most interactive show on Fox Sports Radio, maybe.
The most interactive show on planetar.
Be sure to check out Covino and Rich live on Fox Sports Radio and the iHeartRadio app from five to seven pm Eastern two to four Pacific, And if you miss any of the live show, just search Covino and Rich wherever you get your podcasts, and of course on social media.
That's Cavino and Rich.
You play this week's Fox Super six sponsored by Draft Kings, go to the Fox Sports app and enter for a free chance to win cash prizes.
So the Green Bay Packers, and I'll get to the byte in a second from Matt Lafleur, but there is talk that they the Green Bay Packers, would like Jordan Love to be more vocal. And I was thinking about that this morning.
Is that.
If you break quarterbacks, let's just break them into two groups. Superstars and then really really good quarterback. And these are guys that everybody in the every GM in the league would pay big money superstars or really really really good quarterbacks. I think Tier one superstars. There's five Patrick, Josh Allen Lamar, Joe Burrow and Matthew Stafford. You know, those guys can win and rosters can have holes in it. Then I think Tier two really really good quarterbacks, Justin Herbert, Jalen Hurds, C. J. Stroud, Jordan Love, Jared Goff, Jayden Daniels. I thought Jordan Love was gonna move into Tier one this year and he didn't. Still a bit reckless. But there's only eleven quarterbacks on this list. That means there's only eleven teams of the thirty two a third that have one of these dudes, and both can win super Bowls both tiers. Now Tier two gonna need more help, maybe a better coach, maybe a deeper roster, maybe the perfect oc. Those are my guys. Now, there's guys like Brock Purdy, Sam Darnold, Baker Mayfield. There's some ifs. There's some ifs. If he has McCaffrey, if Fiz protection, if the weather's good, if fies elite. Those guys are very good, but they're closer to if in my opinion, there's if. I think Baker at thirty three million is about right. Sam the same, and I'm not paying Purdy mid fours are up. I'm just not I think they're more if so. The truth is Matt Lafleur, in my opinion, I thought he was going to get to Tier one. He didn't. He's still solidly in Tier two. But I have said about Jordan Love he could fall to Tier three. He's very fortunate. Between Matt Lafleur and the patience of green Bay and their expertise at quarterback, he will remain at two with an opportunity to get to Tier one over the next five years. And that is a great place to be now in terms of being more verbal and vocal. Matt Lafleur, his great head coach, addressed.
That they all respect him, but I think he can when things aren't quite right. I think he can voice that as well, you know, when guys aren't quite doing what they're supposed to be doing. And he's one of the guys I kind of talked to about that, you know, because I just think it means more when it comes from your quarterback than it does from me or one of our other coaches.
Yeah, and by the way, when I show Tier one and Tier two. I am less concerned with the exact dollar figure with these quarterbacks. I'm just paying them. With Baker, Sam Dak Purty, the numbers matter more right, and it's not a knock. I think Jayden Daniels may already be in Tier one if he went to this weekend.
I may be under.
Estimating him, but that's kind of how I see the league. And in my lifetime as somebody that's older now, there have usually been somewhere between four and five Tier one quarterbacks. You think to yourself, it's a problem. This is largely what it's looked like my whole life. Five really special guys and then six or seven under it that maybe need a little help with something. But you can see the talent. I mean CJ. Stroud against the Chargers when he's comfortable at home. There's not a lot of guys that play like that.
So the guys that are not on the list, I went through this Da Baker, Sam Brock, Dak Kyler, Trevor Lawrence. No, no, no, he's no longer in that. Too many bad seasons.
No no, no, no, He's really good except when it rains and stuff.
