If you hate the liberal media but love the 47th President, than this is the podcast for you. Ben Ferguson brings you the commentary on the news that the biased media will not cover.

If you hate the liberal media but love the&nbsp;47th&nbsp;President, than this is the podcast for you. Ben Ferguson brings you the commentary on the news that the biased media will not cover.

THIS PODCAST GIVE YOU WHAT THE BIASED MEDIA WON'T!

The Ben Ferguson Podcast

What You Will See in the First 2024 Republican Presidential Debate

https://api.omny.fm/orgs/e73c998e-6e60-432f-8610-ae210140c5b1/clips/7234ee36-a9a4-401f-8f24-b06600e23ab0/transcript

1. Assault on an ICE Agent in Minneapolis
An incident in Minneapolis where three undocumented immigrants allegedly assaulted an ICE agent with a shovel during a targeted enforcement operation.
The agent reportedly feared for his life and shot one attacker in the leg.
The agent was hospitalized and is recovering; two suspects are in ICE custody, and one remains hospitalized.

2. Sanctuary Policies and State Non‑Cooperation
Minnesota officials refused to cooperate with ICE, which allegedly forced agents to conduct a dangerous field arrest rather than take custody in jail.
The individuals involved had prior immigration violations, missed court hearings, or final deportation orders.

3. Blame Assigned to Democratic Leaders and Rhetoric
Rhetoric from Democratic governors and mayors (including calls to resist ICE) directly encouraged violence against federal agents.
It asserts that describing ICE agents as “Gestapo” or “Nazis” has contributed to an increase in attacks.

4. Criticism of the Biden Administration’s Border Policies
The individuals involved are described as having been released into the U.S. interior under Biden administration policies.
The document argues that lax enforcement and “non‑priority” deportation policies enable repeat offenses and violence.

5. Claims of Media Suppression or Distortion
Mainstream media initially reported the shooting but omitted context about the ICE agent being assaulted.
It suggests a deliberate effort to frame ICE as aggressors rather than victims.

6. Opposition to Proposed “Anti‑ICE” Legislation
Several states (including Oregon, New Jersey, California, New York, and others) are named as considering legislation to limit or penalize ICE activity.
These efforts are portrayed as increasing danger to law enforcement and undermining federal authority.

7. Defense of ICE and Law Enforcement
ICE listing of examples of criminal arrests involving serious violent and sexual offenses.
ICE’s mission is protecting U.S. citizens and accuses political opponents of prioritizing criminals over public safety.

8. Venezuela Segment – Maria Corina Machado
The latter half shifts to foreign policy, highlighting Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado.
Machado is portrayed as a democratic champion who strongly supports Donald Trump’s sanctions and pressure campaign against the Maduro regime.
She claims Venezuela operates as a hub for transnational crime and terrorism.

9. Praise for Trump’s Foreign Policy
Trump is a strong leader on Venezuela and Iran, asserting his policies inspire resistance movements.
Machado reportedly dedicated her Nobel Peace Prize to Trump and expressed confidence in his leadership.

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

1. Assault on an ICE Agent in Minneapolis
<ul>
<li>An incident in Minneapolis where&nbsp;three undocumented immigrants allegedly assaulted an ICE agent with a shovel during a targeted enforcement operation.</li>
<li>The agent reportedly feared for his life and shot one attacker in the leg.</li>
<li>The agent was hospitalized and is recovering; two suspects are in ICE custody, and one remains hospitalized.</li>
</ul>
2. Sanctuary Policies and State Non‑Cooperation
<ul>
<li>Minnesota officials refused to cooperate with ICE, which allegedly forced agents to conduct a dangerous field arrest rather than take custody in jail.</li>
<li>The individuals involved had prior immigration violations, missed court hearings, or final deportation orders.</li>
</ul>
3. Blame Assigned to Democratic Leaders and Rhetoric
<ul>
<li>Rhetoric from Democratic governors and mayors (including calls to resist ICE) directly encouraged violence against federal agents.</li>
<li>It asserts that describing ICE agents as &ldquo;Gestapo&rdquo; or &ldquo;Nazis&rdquo; has contributed to an increase in attacks.</li>
</ul>
4. Criticism of the Biden Administration&rsquo;s Border Policies
<ul>
<li>The individuals involved are described as having been released into the U.S. interior under Biden administration policies.</li>
<li>The document argues that lax enforcement and &ldquo;non‑priority&rdquo; deportation policies enable repeat offenses and violence.</li>
</ul>
5. Claims of Media Suppression or Distortion
<ul>
<li>Mainstream media initially reported the shooting but omitted context about the ICE agent being assaulted.</li>
<li>It suggests a deliberate effort to frame ICE as aggressors rather than victims.</li>
</ul>
6. Opposition to Proposed &ldquo;Anti‑ICE&rdquo; Legislation
<ul>
<li>Several states (including Oregon, New Jersey, California, New York, and others) are named as considering legislation to limit or penalize ICE activity.</li>
<li>These efforts are portrayed as increasing danger to law enforcement and undermining federal authority.</li>
</ul>
7. Defense of ICE and Law Enforcement
<ul>
<li>ICE listing of examples of&nbsp;criminal arrests involving serious violent and sexual offenses.</li>
<li>ICE&rsquo;s mission is protecting U.S. citizens and accuses political opponents of prioritizing criminals over public safety.</li>
</ul>
8. Venezuela Segment &ndash; Maria Corina Machado
<ul>
<li>The latter half shifts to foreign policy, highlighting Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado.</li>
<li>Machado is portrayed as a democratic champion who strongly supports Donald Trump&rsquo;s sanctions and pressure campaign against the Maduro regime.</li>
<li>She claims Venezuela operates as a hub for transnational crime and terrorism.</li>
</ul>
9. Praise for Trump&rsquo;s Foreign Policy
<ul>
<li>Trump is a strong leader on Venezuela and Iran, asserting his policies inspire resistance movements.</li>
<li>Machado reportedly dedicated her Nobel Peace Prize to Trump and expressed confidence in his leadership.</li>
</ul>
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the <a href="https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1119-the-47-morning-update-wit-258481252/" data-auth="NotApplicable" data-linkindex="5">47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson</a> and <a href="https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1119-verdict-with-ted-cruz-56253661/" data-auth="NotApplicable" data-linkindex="4">Verdict with Ted Cruz</a> Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X:&nbsp;<a href="https://x.com/benfergusonshow">https://x.com/benfergusonshow</a>

ICE Agent Brutally Attacked w a Shovel in Minneapolis as Trump presents a New Front Against Maduro

https://api.omny.fm/orgs/e73c998e-6e60-432f-8610-ae210140c5b1/clips/48dd36b5-32f7-4dc5-9953-b3c60070f331/transcript

1. Supreme Court Case Overview
The Attorney General of West Virginia led a case to uphold a state law prohibiting biological males from competing in female sports.
The case reached the U.S. Supreme Court after the ACLU sued West Virginia immediately following the law’s passage.
The outcome is expected to have nationwide implications for similar laws in other states.

2. Core Arguments for the Law
Safety & Fairness: Biological differences create unfair advantages and increase injury risks for female athletes.
Privacy Concerns: Issues with shared locker rooms and potential sexual assaults were cited.
Competitive Integrity: Advocates argue that sports teach discipline and resilience, which is undermined if competition is inherently unequal.

3. Title IX & Equal Protection
Title IX was designed to protect women’s access to sports and education; the law uses “sex” as a basis for delineation.
West Virginia argues its law supports Title IX by preserving opportunities for women.
Equal Protection Clause: The state claims its approach is rational and fair, while the ACLU argues it discriminates against transgender individuals.

4. Broader Social & Ethical Concerns
The document criticizes early gender transition for children, framing it as harmful and profit-driven.
Raises moral questions about parental decisions, medical practices, and societal impact.
Suggests the issue could be viewed historically as one of the most dangerous trends affecting children.

5. Cultural Commentary
Highlights admiration for women’s sports for their style and integrity.
Mentions prominent athletes like Riley Gaines and Martina Navratilova advocating for protecting women’s sports.
Notes growing public support for restricting transgender participation in women’s sports.

6. Expected Impact
A favorable ruling for West Virginia could validate similar laws in 27 other states.
Could lead to lawsuits in states allowing transgender athletes in women’s sports.
Decision anticipated by June or July; likely to set a major precedent.

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

1. Supreme Court Case Overview
<ul>
<li>The Attorney General of West Virginia led a case to uphold a state law prohibiting biological males from competing in female sports.</li>
<li>The case reached the U.S. Supreme Court after the ACLU sued West Virginia immediately following the law&rsquo;s passage.</li>
<li>The outcome is expected to have nationwide implications for similar laws in other states.</li>
</ul>
2. Core Arguments for the Law
<ul>
<li>Safety &amp; Fairness: Biological differences create unfair advantages and increase injury risks for female athletes.</li>
<li>Privacy Concerns: Issues with shared locker rooms and potential sexual assaults were cited.</li>
<li>Competitive Integrity: Advocates argue that sports teach discipline and resilience, which is undermined if competition is inherently unequal.</li>
</ul>
3. Title IX &amp; Equal Protection
<ul>
<li>Title IX was designed to protect women&rsquo;s access to sports and education; the law uses &ldquo;sex&rdquo; as a basis for delineation.</li>
<li>West Virginia argues its law supports Title IX by preserving opportunities for women.</li>
<li>Equal Protection Clause: The state claims its approach is rational and fair, while the ACLU argues it discriminates against transgender individuals.</li>
</ul>
4. Broader Social &amp; Ethical Concerns
<ul>
<li>The document criticizes early gender transition for children, framing it as harmful and profit-driven.</li>
<li>Raises moral questions about parental decisions, medical practices, and societal impact.</li>
<li>Suggests the issue could be viewed historically as one of the most dangerous trends affecting children.</li>
</ul>
5. Cultural Commentary
<ul>
<li>Highlights admiration for women&rsquo;s sports for their style and integrity.</li>
<li>Mentions prominent athletes like Riley Gaines and Martina Navratilova advocating for protecting women&rsquo;s sports.</li>
<li>Notes growing public support for restricting transgender participation in women&rsquo;s sports.</li>
</ul>
6. Expected Impact
<ul>
<li>A favorable ruling for West Virginia could validate similar laws in 27 other states.</li>
<li>Could lead to lawsuits in states allowing transgender athletes in women&rsquo;s sports.</li>
<li>Decision anticipated by June or July; likely to set a major precedent.</li>
</ul>
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the <a href="https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1119-the-47-morning-update-wit-258481252/" data-auth="NotApplicable" data-linkindex="5">47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson</a> and <a href="https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1119-verdict-with-ted-cruz-56253661/" data-auth="NotApplicable" data-linkindex="4">Verdict with Ted Cruz</a> Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X:&nbsp;<a href="https://x.com/benfergusonshow">https://x.com/benfergusonshow</a>

SCOTUS Case That Could Redefine Women’s Sports w WV AG John B. McCuskey

https://api.omny.fm/orgs/e73c998e-6e60-432f-8610-ae210140c5b1/clips/07af034b-705f-4cf5-85cb-b3c60070d1c8/transcript

Cases Discussed


Case 1: Idaho Law Challenge
Idaho law bans transgender girls/women from competing on female sports teams.
Legal question: Does this violate the Equal Protection Clause or Title IX (which prohibits sex discrimination in education)?
Implications: Upholding the law could validate similar bans in over two dozen states; striking it down could roll back restrictions nationwide.


Case 2: West Virginia Law Challenge
West Virginia law bars transgender girls from girls’ sports teams.
Plaintiff: Becky Pepper-Jackson, a transgender student seeking to compete in girls’ track and field.
Legal issue: Whether states can categorize sports teams based solely on biological sex at birth under Title IX and Equal Protection.

Arguments Presented
States’ Position:
Separation by biological sex protects fairness and safety in women’s sports.
Title IX historically supports sex-based distinctions for competitive equity.
Plaintiffs’ Position:
Laws discriminate against transgender students, denying educational and health benefits.
Claim that inclusive policies do not harm cisgender girls’ sports (disputed by opponents).

Key Themes and Observations
Physical Advantage Debate: Evidence presented that even after hormone therapy, transgender women retain significant physical advantages (e.g., strength, wingspan).
Impact on Women’s Sports: Examples cited of injuries and unfair competition in sports like volleyball, boxing, and swimming.
Judicial Dynamics:
Liberal justices (Sotomayor, Kagan, Jackson) expressed strong opposition to bans.
Conservative justices appeared sympathetic to state arguments.
Cultural and Political Commentary:
Emphasis on how Supreme Court composition reflects presidential elections.
Predictions that the Court may uphold state laws.

Broader Implications
Potential Ruling Timeline: Decision expected in June or July.
Significance: Outcome will shape Title IX interpretation and state authority over athletic eligibility.
Framing by Advocacy Groups: ACLU and LGBTQ+ activists frame the issue as a civil rights battle; opponents argue it’s about fairness and safety for women.

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

Cases Discussed
<ol>
<li>
Case 1: Idaho Law Challenge
<ul>
<li>Idaho law bans transgender girls/women from competing on female sports teams.</li>
<li>Legal question: Does this violate the Equal Protection Clause or Title IX (which prohibits sex discrimination in education)?</li>
<li>Implications: Upholding the law could validate similar bans in over two dozen states; striking it down could roll back restrictions nationwide.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
Case 2: West Virginia Law Challenge
<ul>
<li>West Virginia law bars transgender girls from girls&rsquo; sports teams.</li>
<li>Plaintiff: Becky Pepper-Jackson, a transgender student seeking to compete in girls&rsquo; track and field.</li>
<li>Legal issue: Whether states can categorize sports teams based solely on biological sex at birth under Title IX and Equal Protection.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ol>
<hr>
Arguments Presented
<ul>
<li>States&rsquo; Position:
<ul>
<li>Separation by biological sex protects fairness and safety in women&rsquo;s sports.</li>
<li>Title IX historically supports sex-based distinctions for competitive equity.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Plaintiffs&rsquo; Position:
<ul>
<li>Laws discriminate against transgender students, denying educational and health benefits.</li>
<li>Claim that inclusive policies do not harm cisgender girls&rsquo; sports (disputed by opponents).</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<hr>
Key Themes and Observations
<ul>
<li>Physical Advantage Debate: Evidence presented that even after hormone therapy, transgender women retain significant physical advantages (e.g., strength, wingspan).</li>
<li>Impact on Women&rsquo;s Sports: Examples cited of injuries and unfair competition in sports like volleyball, boxing, and swimming.</li>
<li>Judicial Dynamics:
<ul>
<li>Liberal justices (Sotomayor, Kagan, Jackson) expressed strong opposition to bans.</li>
<li>Conservative justices appeared sympathetic to state arguments.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Cultural and Political Commentary:
<ul>
<li>Emphasis on how Supreme Court composition reflects presidential elections.</li>
<li>Predictions that the Court may uphold state laws.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<hr>
Broader Implications
<ul>
<li>Potential Ruling Timeline: Decision expected in June or July.</li>
<li>Significance: Outcome will shape Title IX interpretation and state authority over athletic eligibility.</li>
<li>Framing by Advocacy Groups: ACLU and LGBTQ+ activists frame the issue as a civil rights battle; opponents argue it&rsquo;s about fairness and safety for women.</li>
</ul>
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the <a href="https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1119-the-47-morning-update-wit-258481252/" data-auth="NotApplicable" data-linkindex="5">47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson</a> and <a href="https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1119-verdict-with-ted-cruz-56253661/" data-auth="NotApplicable" data-linkindex="4">Verdict with Ted Cruz</a> Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X:&nbsp;<a href="https://x.com/benfergusonshow">https://x.com/benfergusonshow</a>

Transgender Athlete Debate Goes Prime Time at SCOTUS

https://api.omny.fm/orgs/e73c998e-6e60-432f-8610-ae210140c5b1/clips/94b7f9bd-4cac-40b5-bc99-b3c60070a3ef/transcript

What You Will See in the First 2024 Republican Presidential Debate

In 1 playlist(s)

The Ben Ferguson Podcast

Social links

Follow podcast

Recent clips