Polling Data
51% of likely voters under 40 want a Democratic socialist to win the 2028 presidential election.
Party breakdown:
Democrats under 40: 82% support a socialist president.
Republicans under 40: 65% oppose, but 24% support, and 11% are unsure.
Independents: 37% support, 32% unsure, 31% oppose.
Poll conducted by Rasmussen with ~1,500 respondents aged 18–39, margin of error ±3%.


Influence Sources
Parents: 27% cited parental influence as the reason for supporting socialism.
Online videos/podcasts: 17%.
Books: 10%.
Grandparents: 7%.
Traditional media and church leaders had minimal influence (under 6%).


Author’s Perspective
The Democratic Party is dominated by socialists, communists, and Marxists.
The indoctrination in schools and universities, plus foreign funding (e.g., China), has shaped young voters.
Conservatives need to engage younger generations or risk losing future elections.


Cultural and Political Commentary
This is a “long game” by left-wing ideologies.
Class warfare narratives and anti-capitalist sentiment are driving youth toward socialism.
Republicans need to counteract these influences.


Additional Sections
Trump’s Georgia case dismissed: Brief legal update on election interference charges.
Economic notes: Gas prices falling, holiday spending projected to exceed $1 trillion, Thanksgiving meal costs down.

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

<ul>
<li>
Polling Data
<ul>
<li>51% of likely voters under 40 want a Democratic socialist to win the 2028 presidential election.</li>
<li>Party breakdown:
<ul>
<li>Democrats under 40: 82% support a socialist president.</li>
<li>Republicans under 40: 65% oppose, but 24% support, and 11% are unsure.</li>
<li>Independents: 37% support, 32% unsure, 31% oppose.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Poll conducted by Rasmussen with ~1,500 respondents aged 18&ndash;39, margin of error &plusmn;3%.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
Influence Sources
<ul>
<li>Parents: 27% cited parental influence as the reason for supporting socialism.</li>
<li>Online videos/podcasts: 17%.</li>
<li>Books: 10%.</li>
<li>Grandparents: 7%.</li>
<li>Traditional media and church leaders had minimal influence (under 6%).</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
Author&rsquo;s Perspective
<ul>
<li>The Democratic Party is dominated by socialists, communists, and Marxists.</li>
<li>The indoctrination in schools and universities, plus foreign funding (e.g., China), has shaped young voters.</li>
<li>Conservatives need to engage younger generations or risk losing future elections.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
Cultural and Political Commentary
<ul>
<li>This is a &ldquo;long game&rdquo; by left-wing ideologies.</li>
<li>Class warfare narratives and anti-capitalist sentiment are driving youth toward socialism.</li>
<li>Republicans need to counteract these influences.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
Additional Sections
<ul>
<li>Trump&rsquo;s Georgia case dismissed: Brief legal update on election interference charges.</li>
<li>Economic notes: Gas prices falling, holiday spending projected to exceed $1 trillion, Thanksgiving meal costs down.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the <a href="https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1119-the-47-morning-update-wit-258481252/" data-auth="NotApplicable" data-linkindex="5">47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson</a> and <a href="https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1119-verdict-with-ted-cruz-56253661/" data-auth="NotApplicable" data-linkindex="4">Verdict with Ted Cruz</a> Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X:&nbsp;<a href="https://x.com/benfergusonshow">https://x.com/benfergusonshow</a>

If you hate the liberal media but love the 47th President, than this is the podcast for you. Ben Ferguson brings you the commentary on the news that the biased media will not cover.

If you hate the liberal media but love the&nbsp;47th&nbsp;President, than this is the podcast for you. Ben Ferguson brings you the commentary on the news that the biased media will not cover.

THIS PODCAST GIVE YOU WHAT THE BIASED MEDIA WON'T!

The Ben Ferguson Podcast

Poll Shock: 51% of Millennials and Gen Z Favor Socialist White House

https://api.omny.fm/orgs/e73c998e-6e60-432f-8610-ae210140c5b1/clips/cc863ec5-50bc-4ce7-a402-b396006f1c20/transcript

1. Proposed U.S.–Iran 60-Day Ceasefire

The deal is only a framework or memorandum of understanding, not finalized.
Final approval would require top-level leaders (President Trump and Iran’s Supreme Leader).
Iran is negotiating from weakness, citing:

Economic collapse
Military pressure
Internal instability

2. Continued Military Tensions
Despite talk of a ceasefire, the text highlights ongoing conflict and violations, including:

Drone and missile attacks linked to Iran
U.S. defensive strikes
Escalation risks in the Strait of Hormuz
It underscores how fragile and unstable the situation is, noting how quickly conflict can escalate.

3. U.S. Policy Position
The U.S. stance is described as:

Refusing a “bad deal”
Insisting Iran:

Give up enriched uranium
Abandon nuclear ambitions
Keep shipping lanes open
President Trump is:

Strong and cautious
Willing to negotiate, but only on strict terms

4. Shift to Domestic Issue: Government Fraud
Claims of billions of dollars in fraudulent contracts (e.g., $6.3 billion identified).
Anecdotal examples of alleged misuse:

Personal luxury spending (homes, travel, cosmetic procedures)
Misuse of funds intended for public programs (healthcare, homelessness, etc.)

5. Government Response: Anti-Fraud Efforts
A White House Anti-Fraud Task Force (led by the Vice President) is highlighted.
Actions described:

Investigations
Arrests
Withholding billions in suspicious payments
The General Services Administration (GSA) is said to be involved in expanding oversight.

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

1. Proposed U.S.&ndash;Iran 60-Day Ceasefire
<ul>
<li>
<ul>
<li>The deal is only a framework or memorandum of understanding, not finalized.</li>
<li>Final approval would require top-level leaders (President Trump and Iran&rsquo;s Supreme Leader).</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Iran is negotiating from weakness, citing:
<ul>
<li>Economic collapse</li>
<li>Military pressure</li>
<li>Internal instability</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<hr>
2. Continued Military Tensions
<ul>
<li>Despite talk of a ceasefire, the text highlights ongoing conflict and violations, including:
<ul>
<li>Drone and missile attacks linked to Iran</li>
<li>U.S. defensive strikes</li>
<li>Escalation risks in the Strait of Hormuz</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>It underscores how fragile and unstable the situation is, noting how quickly conflict can escalate.</li>
</ul>
<hr>
3. U.S. Policy Position
<ul>
<li>The U.S. stance is described as:
<ul>
<li>Refusing a &ldquo;bad deal&rdquo;</li>
<li>Insisting Iran:
<ul>
<li>Give up enriched uranium</li>
<li>Abandon nuclear ambitions</li>
<li>Keep shipping lanes open</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>President Trump is:
<ul>
<li>Strong and cautious</li>
<li>Willing to negotiate, but only on strict terms</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<hr>
4. Shift to Domestic Issue: Government Fraud
<ul>
<li>Claims of billions of dollars in fraudulent contracts (e.g., $6.3 billion identified).</li>
<li>Anecdotal examples of alleged misuse:
<ul>
<li>Personal luxury spending (homes, travel, cosmetic procedures)</li>
<li>Misuse of funds intended for public programs (healthcare, homelessness, etc.)</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<hr>
5. Government Response: Anti-Fraud Efforts
<ul>
<li>A White House Anti-Fraud Task Force (led by the Vice President) is highlighted.</li>
<li>Actions described:
<ul>
<li>Investigations</li>
<li>Arrests</li>
<li>Withholding billions in suspicious payments</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The General Services Administration (GSA) is said to be involved in expanding oversight.</li>
</ul>
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the <a href="https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1119-the-47-morning-update-wit-258481252/" data-auth="NotApplicable" data-linkindex="5">47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson</a> and <a href="https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1119-verdict-with-ted-cruz-56253661/" data-auth="NotApplicable" data-linkindex="4">Verdict with Ted Cruz</a> Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X:&nbsp;<a href="https://x.com/benfergusonshow">https://x.com/benfergusonshow</a>

Iran Tests Limits w 60-Day Ceasefire plus Champagne Lifestyles on the Public Dime

https://api.omny.fm/orgs/e73c998e-6e60-432f-8610-ae210140c5b1/clips/eda6bb89-13bb-47be-82d1-b4460069bc6e/transcript

1. Aggressive Stance Toward Iran
Iran’s economy is collapsing (high inflation, weak currency, falling oil production)
The U.S. has maximum leverage due to sanctions
The goal is to force Iran into a favorable deal, especially on nuclear issues
Iran is weak and desperate
The U.S. is holding overwhelming leverage
Negotiations are one-sided and pressure-driven

2. Strategic Importance of the Strait of Hormuz
The Strait as a critical global oil chokepoint
U.S. refusal to allow Iran or others to control it
Willingness to use force to keep it open

This serves to:
Justify a strong military posture
Emphasize global economic consequences
Frame U.S. actions as protecting international stability

3. “Pressure First” Foreign Policy Doctrine

Trump’s approach is a:
No sanctions relief
No financial concessions
Negotiations only after compliance

This reflects a maximum pressure strategy, where:
Economic hardship is used as leverage
Diplomacy is conditional, not reciprocal

4. Domestic Policy Messaging (Immigration & Security)
Strong emphasis on strict enforcement and deportation
Claims of:

“Zero illegal entries”
Major reductions in crime
Portrayal of prior policies as chaotic or weak
Immigration is tied to:

National security
Economic costs
Electoral representation (via census counts)

5. Census and Political Power Argument
Counting non-citizens in the census:

Increases political representation in certain states
Benefits Democratic-leaning regions
Immigration is connected to:

Electoral College influence
Congressional seat allocation

This reflects a political argument, not a neutral demographic analysis.

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

1. Aggressive Stance Toward Iran
<ul>
<li>Iran&rsquo;s economy is collapsing (high inflation, weak currency, falling oil production)</li>
<li>The U.S. has maximum leverage due to sanctions</li>
<li>The goal is to force Iran into a favorable deal, especially on nuclear issues</li>
<li>Iran is weak and desperate</li>
<li>The U.S. is holding overwhelming leverage</li>
<li>Negotiations are one-sided and pressure-driven</li>
</ul>
<hr>
2. Strategic Importance of the Strait of Hormuz
<ul>
<li>The Strait as a critical global oil chokepoint</li>
<li>U.S. refusal to allow Iran or others to control it</li>
<li>Willingness to use force to keep it open</li>
</ul>
This serves to:
<ul>
<li>Justify a strong military posture</li>
<li>Emphasize global economic consequences</li>
<li>Frame U.S. actions as protecting international stability</li>
</ul>
<hr>
3. &ldquo;Pressure First&rdquo; Foreign Policy Doctrine
Trump&rsquo;s approach is a:
<ul>
<li>No sanctions relief</li>
<li>No financial concessions</li>
<li>Negotiations only after compliance</li>
</ul>
This reflects a maximum pressure strategy, where:
<ul>
<li>Economic hardship is used as leverage</li>
<li>Diplomacy is conditional, not reciprocal</li>
</ul>
<hr>
4. Domestic Policy Messaging (Immigration &amp; Security)
<ul>
<li>Strong emphasis on strict enforcement and deportation</li>
<li>Claims of:
<ul>
<li>&ldquo;Zero illegal entries&rdquo;</li>
<li>Major reductions in crime</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Portrayal of prior policies as chaotic or weak</li>
<li>Immigration is tied to:
<ul>
<li>National security</li>
<li>Economic costs</li>
<li>Electoral representation (via census counts)</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<hr>
5. Census and Political Power Argument
<ul>
<li>Counting non-citizens in the census:
<ul>
<li>Increases political representation in certain states</li>
<li>Benefits Democratic-leaning regions</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Immigration is connected to:
<ul>
<li>Electoral College influence</li>
<li>Congressional seat allocation</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
This reflects a political argument, not a neutral demographic analysis.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the <a href="https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1119-the-47-morning-update-wit-258481252/" data-auth="NotApplicable" data-linkindex="5">47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson</a> and <a href="https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1119-verdict-with-ted-cruz-56253661/" data-auth="NotApplicable" data-linkindex="4">Verdict with Ted Cruz</a> Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X:&nbsp;<a href="https://x.com/benfergusonshow">https://x.com/benfergusonshow</a>

Trump talks Strait to Iran “NO DEAL, NO CASH”

https://api.omny.fm/orgs/e73c998e-6e60-432f-8610-ae210140c5b1/clips/aba9506e-60f0-40cb-a544-b44600699dc8/transcript

1. Election Results & Significance
Ken Paxton wins decisively with roughly 64% vs 36% (a ~28-point margin).
This is described as:

A major upset for an incumbent
A “sea change” in Republican politics
Cornyn had:

24 years in the Senate
Significant institutional power and funding
Despite heavy financial backing (over $100M+ spent, mostly for Cornyn), Paxton wins overwhelmingly.

2. Why Paxton Won

Several factors are highlighted:

✅ Anti-establishment sentiment
The race was a:

“Conservative grassroots vs establishment Republican”
Voters favored a more ideological, outsider-style candidate.

✅ Trump’s influence
Donald Trump endorsed Paxton (late in the race).
The hosts argue:

The endorsement boosted Paxton’s margin
But Paxton was already leading in polls

✅ Perception of ideological purity
Paxton is:

“The most conservative attorney general in the country”
This appealed to Republican primary voters.

3. The Role of Money
The race becomes:

One of the most expensive Senate primaries ever
Despite:

Massive spending (mostly pro-Cornyn)
Outcome shows: 👉 Money was less decisive than voter sentiment and political alignment

4. Warning About the General Election
Do not assume Republicans will easily win

Historical comparison:
Cruz compares this to the 2018 Texas Senate race:

Democrats dramatically increased turnout
He narrowly won despite being heavily outspent

Key risks identified:
Energized Democratic voters
Lower Republican turnout in non-presidential cycles
Heavy outside funding from national donors

5. Introduction of the Democratic Candidate

The Democratic nominee is introduced as James Talarico.
Ideologically extreme
Strategically dangerous because:

He presents himself in a calm, relatable manner
He may appeal to moderate voters

6. Strategic Concerns for Republicans

The authors emphasize:

🧠 Voter perception risk
Talarico could appeal to:

Moderates
Less politically engaged voters

🎯 Campaign advice
Republicans should:

Focus on communicating Talarico’s positions
Drive high voter turnout
Avoid complacency

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

1. Election Results &amp; Significance
<ul>
<li>Ken Paxton wins decisively with roughly 64% vs 36% (a ~28-point margin).</li>
<li>This is described as:
<ul>
<li>A major upset for an incumbent</li>
<li>A &ldquo;sea change&rdquo; in Republican politics</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Cornyn had:
<ul>
<li>24 years in the Senate</li>
<li>Significant institutional power and funding</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Despite heavy financial backing (over $100M+ spent, mostly for Cornyn), Paxton wins overwhelmingly.</li>
</ul>
<hr>
2. Why Paxton Won
Several factors are highlighted:
✅ Anti-establishment sentiment
<ul>
<li>The race was a:
<ul>
<li>&ldquo;Conservative grassroots vs establishment Republican&rdquo;</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Voters favored a more ideological, outsider-style candidate.</li>
</ul>
✅ Trump&rsquo;s influence
<ul>
<li>Donald Trump endorsed Paxton (late in the race).</li>
<li>The hosts argue:
<ul>
<li>The endorsement boosted Paxton&rsquo;s margin</li>
<li>But Paxton was already leading in polls</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
✅ Perception of ideological purity
<ul>
<li>Paxton is:
<ul>
<li>&ldquo;The most conservative attorney general in the country&rdquo;</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>This appealed to Republican primary voters.</li>
</ul>
<hr>
3. The Role of Money
<ul>
<li>The race becomes:
<ul>
<li>One of the most expensive Senate primaries ever</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Despite:
<ul>
<li>Massive spending (mostly pro-Cornyn)</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Outcome shows: 👉 Money was less decisive than voter sentiment and political alignment</li>
</ul>
<hr>
4. Warning About the General Election
<ul>
<li>Do not assume Republicans will easily win</li>
</ul>
Historical comparison:
<ul>
<li>Cruz compares this to the 2018 Texas Senate race:
<ul>
<li>Democrats dramatically increased turnout</li>
<li>He narrowly won despite being heavily outspent</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
Key risks identified:
<ul>
<li>Energized Democratic voters</li>
<li>Lower Republican turnout in non-presidential cycles</li>
<li>Heavy outside funding from national donors</li>
</ul>
<hr>
5. Introduction of the Democratic Candidate
The Democratic nominee is introduced as James Talarico.
<ul>
<li>Ideologically extreme</li>
<li>Strategically dangerous because:
<ul>
<li>He presents himself in a calm, relatable manner</li>
<li>He may appeal to moderate voters</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<hr>
6. Strategic Concerns for Republicans
The authors emphasize:
🧠 Voter perception risk
<ul>
<li>Talarico could appeal to:
<ul>
<li>Moderates</li>
<li>Less politically engaged voters</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
🎯 Campaign advice
<ul>
<li>Republicans should:
<ul>
<li>Focus on communicating Talarico&rsquo;s positions</li>
<li>Drive high voter turnout</li>
<li>Avoid complacency</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the <a href="https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1119-the-47-morning-update-wit-258481252/" data-auth="NotApplicable" data-linkindex="5">47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson</a> and <a href="https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1119-verdict-with-ted-cruz-56253661/" data-auth="NotApplicable" data-linkindex="4">Verdict with Ted Cruz</a> Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X:&nbsp;<a href="https://x.com/benfergusonshow">https://x.com/benfergusonshow</a>

Cornyn Crushed, Grassroots Paxton Wins plus Beware of Likable Jim Talarico, the Liberal RADICAL 'Moderate?'

https://api.omny.fm/orgs/e73c998e-6e60-432f-8610-ae210140c5b1/clips/d3fb40bf-3f32-48a2-b0cc-b44600697e5b/transcript

Poll Shock: 51% of Millennials and Gen Z Favor Socialist White House

In 1 playlist(s)

The Ben Ferguson Podcast

Social links

Follow podcast

Recent clips