Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the <a href="https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1119-the-47-morning-update-wit-258481252/" data-auth="NotApplicable" data-linkindex="5">47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson</a> and <a href="https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1119-verdict-with-ted-cruz-56253661/" data-auth="NotApplicable" data-linkindex="4">Verdict with Ted Cruz</a> Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X:&nbsp;<a href="https://x.com/benfergusonshow">https://x.com/benfergusonshow</a>

If you hate the liberal media but love the 47th President, than this is the podcast for you. Ben Ferguson brings you the commentary on the news that the biased media will not cover.

If you hate the liberal media but love the&nbsp;47th&nbsp;President, than this is the podcast for you. Ben Ferguson brings you the commentary on the news that the biased media will not cover.

THIS PODCAST GIVE YOU WHAT THE BIASED MEDIA WON'T!

The Ben Ferguson Podcast

Cracker Barrel Abandons Rebrand plus Tariff Windfall Could Slash $4 Trillion Off U.S. Debt

https://api.omny.fm/orgs/e73c998e-6e60-432f-8610-ae210140c5b1/clips/0e41a19f-6711-465b-9dbd-b33b005e0c4b/transcript

1. Supreme Court Case Overview
The Attorney General of West Virginia led a case to uphold a state law prohibiting biological males from competing in female sports.
The case reached the U.S. Supreme Court after the ACLU sued West Virginia immediately following the law’s passage.
The outcome is expected to have nationwide implications for similar laws in other states.

2. Core Arguments for the Law
Safety & Fairness: Biological differences create unfair advantages and increase injury risks for female athletes.
Privacy Concerns: Issues with shared locker rooms and potential sexual assaults were cited.
Competitive Integrity: Advocates argue that sports teach discipline and resilience, which is undermined if competition is inherently unequal.

3. Title IX & Equal Protection
Title IX was designed to protect women’s access to sports and education; the law uses “sex” as a basis for delineation.
West Virginia argues its law supports Title IX by preserving opportunities for women.
Equal Protection Clause: The state claims its approach is rational and fair, while the ACLU argues it discriminates against transgender individuals.

4. Broader Social & Ethical Concerns
The document criticizes early gender transition for children, framing it as harmful and profit-driven.
Raises moral questions about parental decisions, medical practices, and societal impact.
Suggests the issue could be viewed historically as one of the most dangerous trends affecting children.

5. Cultural Commentary
Highlights admiration for women’s sports for their style and integrity.
Mentions prominent athletes like Riley Gaines and Martina Navratilova advocating for protecting women’s sports.
Notes growing public support for restricting transgender participation in women’s sports.

6. Expected Impact
A favorable ruling for West Virginia could validate similar laws in 27 other states.
Could lead to lawsuits in states allowing transgender athletes in women’s sports.
Decision anticipated by June or July; likely to set a major precedent.

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

1. Supreme Court Case Overview
<ul>
<li>The Attorney General of West Virginia led a case to uphold a state law prohibiting biological males from competing in female sports.</li>
<li>The case reached the U.S. Supreme Court after the ACLU sued West Virginia immediately following the law&rsquo;s passage.</li>
<li>The outcome is expected to have nationwide implications for similar laws in other states.</li>
</ul>
2. Core Arguments for the Law
<ul>
<li>Safety &amp; Fairness: Biological differences create unfair advantages and increase injury risks for female athletes.</li>
<li>Privacy Concerns: Issues with shared locker rooms and potential sexual assaults were cited.</li>
<li>Competitive Integrity: Advocates argue that sports teach discipline and resilience, which is undermined if competition is inherently unequal.</li>
</ul>
3. Title IX &amp; Equal Protection
<ul>
<li>Title IX was designed to protect women&rsquo;s access to sports and education; the law uses &ldquo;sex&rdquo; as a basis for delineation.</li>
<li>West Virginia argues its law supports Title IX by preserving opportunities for women.</li>
<li>Equal Protection Clause: The state claims its approach is rational and fair, while the ACLU argues it discriminates against transgender individuals.</li>
</ul>
4. Broader Social &amp; Ethical Concerns
<ul>
<li>The document criticizes early gender transition for children, framing it as harmful and profit-driven.</li>
<li>Raises moral questions about parental decisions, medical practices, and societal impact.</li>
<li>Suggests the issue could be viewed historically as one of the most dangerous trends affecting children.</li>
</ul>
5. Cultural Commentary
<ul>
<li>Highlights admiration for women&rsquo;s sports for their style and integrity.</li>
<li>Mentions prominent athletes like Riley Gaines and Martina Navratilova advocating for protecting women&rsquo;s sports.</li>
<li>Notes growing public support for restricting transgender participation in women&rsquo;s sports.</li>
</ul>
6. Expected Impact
<ul>
<li>A favorable ruling for West Virginia could validate similar laws in 27 other states.</li>
<li>Could lead to lawsuits in states allowing transgender athletes in women&rsquo;s sports.</li>
<li>Decision anticipated by June or July; likely to set a major precedent.</li>
</ul>
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the <a href="https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1119-the-47-morning-update-wit-258481252/" data-auth="NotApplicable" data-linkindex="5">47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson</a> and <a href="https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1119-verdict-with-ted-cruz-56253661/" data-auth="NotApplicable" data-linkindex="4">Verdict with Ted Cruz</a> Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X:&nbsp;<a href="https://x.com/benfergusonshow">https://x.com/benfergusonshow</a>

SCOTUS Case That Could Redefine Women’s Sports w WV AG John B. McCuskey

https://api.omny.fm/orgs/e73c998e-6e60-432f-8610-ae210140c5b1/clips/07af034b-705f-4cf5-85cb-b3c60070d1c8/transcript

Cases Discussed


Case 1: Idaho Law Challenge
Idaho law bans transgender girls/women from competing on female sports teams.
Legal question: Does this violate the Equal Protection Clause or Title IX (which prohibits sex discrimination in education)?
Implications: Upholding the law could validate similar bans in over two dozen states; striking it down could roll back restrictions nationwide.


Case 2: West Virginia Law Challenge
West Virginia law bars transgender girls from girls’ sports teams.
Plaintiff: Becky Pepper-Jackson, a transgender student seeking to compete in girls’ track and field.
Legal issue: Whether states can categorize sports teams based solely on biological sex at birth under Title IX and Equal Protection.

Arguments Presented
States’ Position:
Separation by biological sex protects fairness and safety in women’s sports.
Title IX historically supports sex-based distinctions for competitive equity.
Plaintiffs’ Position:
Laws discriminate against transgender students, denying educational and health benefits.
Claim that inclusive policies do not harm cisgender girls’ sports (disputed by opponents).

Key Themes and Observations
Physical Advantage Debate: Evidence presented that even after hormone therapy, transgender women retain significant physical advantages (e.g., strength, wingspan).
Impact on Women’s Sports: Examples cited of injuries and unfair competition in sports like volleyball, boxing, and swimming.
Judicial Dynamics:
Liberal justices (Sotomayor, Kagan, Jackson) expressed strong opposition to bans.
Conservative justices appeared sympathetic to state arguments.
Cultural and Political Commentary:
Emphasis on how Supreme Court composition reflects presidential elections.
Predictions that the Court may uphold state laws.

Broader Implications
Potential Ruling Timeline: Decision expected in June or July.
Significance: Outcome will shape Title IX interpretation and state authority over athletic eligibility.
Framing by Advocacy Groups: ACLU and LGBTQ+ activists frame the issue as a civil rights battle; opponents argue it’s about fairness and safety for women.

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

Cases Discussed
<ol>
<li>
Case 1: Idaho Law Challenge
<ul>
<li>Idaho law bans transgender girls/women from competing on female sports teams.</li>
<li>Legal question: Does this violate the Equal Protection Clause or Title IX (which prohibits sex discrimination in education)?</li>
<li>Implications: Upholding the law could validate similar bans in over two dozen states; striking it down could roll back restrictions nationwide.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
Case 2: West Virginia Law Challenge
<ul>
<li>West Virginia law bars transgender girls from girls&rsquo; sports teams.</li>
<li>Plaintiff: Becky Pepper-Jackson, a transgender student seeking to compete in girls&rsquo; track and field.</li>
<li>Legal issue: Whether states can categorize sports teams based solely on biological sex at birth under Title IX and Equal Protection.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ol>
<hr>
Arguments Presented
<ul>
<li>States&rsquo; Position:
<ul>
<li>Separation by biological sex protects fairness and safety in women&rsquo;s sports.</li>
<li>Title IX historically supports sex-based distinctions for competitive equity.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Plaintiffs&rsquo; Position:
<ul>
<li>Laws discriminate against transgender students, denying educational and health benefits.</li>
<li>Claim that inclusive policies do not harm cisgender girls&rsquo; sports (disputed by opponents).</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<hr>
Key Themes and Observations
<ul>
<li>Physical Advantage Debate: Evidence presented that even after hormone therapy, transgender women retain significant physical advantages (e.g., strength, wingspan).</li>
<li>Impact on Women&rsquo;s Sports: Examples cited of injuries and unfair competition in sports like volleyball, boxing, and swimming.</li>
<li>Judicial Dynamics:
<ul>
<li>Liberal justices (Sotomayor, Kagan, Jackson) expressed strong opposition to bans.</li>
<li>Conservative justices appeared sympathetic to state arguments.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Cultural and Political Commentary:
<ul>
<li>Emphasis on how Supreme Court composition reflects presidential elections.</li>
<li>Predictions that the Court may uphold state laws.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<hr>
Broader Implications
<ul>
<li>Potential Ruling Timeline: Decision expected in June or July.</li>
<li>Significance: Outcome will shape Title IX interpretation and state authority over athletic eligibility.</li>
<li>Framing by Advocacy Groups: ACLU and LGBTQ+ activists frame the issue as a civil rights battle; opponents argue it&rsquo;s about fairness and safety for women.</li>
</ul>
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the <a href="https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1119-the-47-morning-update-wit-258481252/" data-auth="NotApplicable" data-linkindex="5">47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson</a> and <a href="https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1119-verdict-with-ted-cruz-56253661/" data-auth="NotApplicable" data-linkindex="4">Verdict with Ted Cruz</a> Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X:&nbsp;<a href="https://x.com/benfergusonshow">https://x.com/benfergusonshow</a>

Transgender Athlete Debate Goes Prime Time at SCOTUS

https://api.omny.fm/orgs/e73c998e-6e60-432f-8610-ae210140c5b1/clips/94b7f9bd-4cac-40b5-bc99-b3c60070a3ef/transcript

1. U.S. Operation in Venezuela
A report claims the U.S. used sonic weapons during an operation to capture Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro.
Eyewitness testimony from a guard at a Caracas military base describes:

Radar systems shutting down.
Drones and advanced U.S. technology overwhelming Venezuelan forces.
Deployment of sonic weapons causing severe physical effects (nosebleeds, vomiting blood, incapacitation).
The White House Press Secretary shared the story, possibly as a strategic message to other nations (e.g., Mexico) about U.S. military capabilities.
Pentagon and White House did not officially confirm the use of sonic weapons.

2. Broader U.S. Policy on Cartels
President Trump reiterated a hardline stance against drug cartels, referencing past actions against drug boats.
Suggested possible future actions against Mexico if cartels continue to dominate.
Emphasized national security concerns tied to fentanyl and drug trafficking.

3. Cuba’s Reaction
After Maduro’s capture, Cuba’s Communist Party issued threats against the U.S., warning of severe consequences if similar actions were attempted in Cuba.
Trump responded, stating Cuba will no longer receive oil or money from Venezuela and urged them to negotiate before it’s “too late.”

4. Massive Fraud in Minnesota
Whistleblowers accuse Governor Tim Walz’s administration of covering up systemic fraud in state programs since 2019.
Fraud includes:

Childcare assistance program.
Medicaid-funded programs (autism centers, sober homes, transportation, housing).
Feeding Our Future scandal (over $300 million).
Estimated fraud could reach $9 billion.
Allegations of political protection and retaliation against whistleblowers.
Republican-led committee pushing for accountability and reforms (e.g., independent Inspector General, whistleblower protections).

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

1. U.S. Operation in Venezuela
<ul>
<li>A report claims the U.S. used sonic weapons during an operation to capture Venezuelan leader Nicol&aacute;s Maduro.</li>
<li>Eyewitness testimony from a guard at a Caracas military base describes:
<ul>
<li>Radar systems shutting down.</li>
<li>Drones and advanced U.S. technology overwhelming Venezuelan forces.</li>
<li>Deployment of sonic weapons causing severe physical effects (nosebleeds, vomiting blood, incapacitation).</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The White House Press Secretary shared the story, possibly as a strategic message to other nations (e.g., Mexico) about U.S. military capabilities.</li>
<li>Pentagon and White House did not officially confirm the use of sonic weapons.</li>
</ul>
<hr>
2. Broader U.S. Policy on Cartels
<ul>
<li>President Trump reiterated a hardline stance against drug cartels, referencing past actions against drug boats.</li>
<li>Suggested possible future actions against Mexico if cartels continue to dominate.</li>
<li>Emphasized national security concerns tied to fentanyl and drug trafficking.</li>
</ul>
<hr>
3. Cuba&rsquo;s Reaction
<ul>
<li>After Maduro&rsquo;s capture, Cuba&rsquo;s Communist Party issued threats against the U.S., warning of severe consequences if similar actions were attempted in Cuba.</li>
<li>Trump responded, stating Cuba will no longer receive oil or money from Venezuela and urged them to negotiate before it&rsquo;s &ldquo;too late.&rdquo;</li>
</ul>
<hr>
4. Massive Fraud in Minnesota
<ul>
<li>Whistleblowers accuse Governor Tim Walz&rsquo;s administration of covering up systemic fraud in state programs since 2019.</li>
<li>Fraud includes:
<ul>
<li>Childcare assistance program.</li>
<li>Medicaid-funded programs (autism centers, sober homes, transportation, housing).</li>
<li>Feeding Our Future scandal (over $300 million).</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Estimated fraud could reach $9 billion.</li>
<li>Allegations of political protection and retaliation against whistleblowers.</li>
<li>Republican-led committee pushing for accountability and reforms (e.g., independent Inspector General, whistleblower protections).</li>
</ul>
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the <a href="https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1119-the-47-morning-update-wit-258481252/" data-auth="NotApplicable" data-linkindex="5">47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson</a> and <a href="https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1119-verdict-with-ted-cruz-56253661/" data-auth="NotApplicable" data-linkindex="4">Verdict with Ted Cruz</a> Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X:&nbsp;<a href="https://x.com/benfergusonshow">https://x.com/benfergusonshow</a>

Drones, Sonic Blasts and Zero Casualties plus Whistleblowers Say Walz Covered Up Criminal Fraud

https://api.omny.fm/orgs/e73c998e-6e60-432f-8610-ae210140c5b1/clips/77be86d1-dcb9-4e45-ab83-b3c60070859b/transcript

Cracker Barrel Abandons Rebrand plus Tariff Windfall Could Slash $4 Trillion Off U.S. Debt

In 1 playlist(s)

The Ben Ferguson Podcast

Social links

Follow podcast

Recent clips