Trump says U.S. will "take over the Gaza Strip" during news conference with Netanyahu also an Order is Set to Ban Transgender Girls and Women From Female School Sports plus Zelenskyy on Ukraine War Aid, "Got Only $75 of $177bn, Where is the Remaining Money?"

 

 

Trump says U.S. will "take over the Gaza Strip" during news conference with Netanyahu also an Order is Set to Ban Transgender Girls and Women From Female School Sports plus Zelenskyy on Ukraine War Aid, "Got Only $75 of $177bn, Where is the Remaining Money?"
&nbsp;
&nbsp;

Hosted by popular national radio host, podcaster and political commentator Ben Ferguson, The 47 Morning Update spotlights the latest news and political headlines, with a special focus on the President's administration, policies, and agenda.

Join Ben for unfiltered insights, exclusive interviews, and honest commentary you won’t get from the mainstream media. Ben takes you behind the scenes, covering the issues shaping America today - straight from the President’s Oval Office.

Don’t miss a single episode. New updates drop daily, Monday through Saturday. Subscribe now on the iHeartRadio app or wherever you listen to podcasts—be informed, stay ahead, and join Ben on The 47 Morning Update!

Hosted by popular national radio host, podcaster and political commentator Ben Ferguson,&nbsp;The 47 Morning Update spotlights the latest news and political headlines, with a special focus on the President's administration, policies, and agenda.
Join Ben for unfiltered insights, exclusive interviews, and honest commentary you won&rsquo;t get from the mainstream media. Ben takes you behind the scenes, covering the issues shaping America today - straight from the President&rsquo;s Oval Office.
Don&rsquo;t miss a single episode. New updates drop daily, Monday through Saturday. Subscribe now on the iHeartRadio app or wherever you listen to podcasts&mdash;be informed, stay ahead, and join Ben on The 47 Morning Update!

The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson

If you hate the liberal media but love the 47th President, than this is the podcast for you. Ben Ferguson brings you the commentary on the news that the biased media will not cover.

If you hate the liberal media but love the&nbsp;47th&nbsp;President, than this is the podcast for you. Ben Ferguson brings you the commentary on the news that the biased media will not cover.

THIS PODCAST GIVE YOU WHAT THE BIASED MEDIA WON'T!

The Ben Ferguson Podcast

US Gaza Take Over & Ukraine Admits 100billion Missing in US Aid

https://api.omny.fm/orgs/e73c998e-6e60-432f-8610-ae210140c5b1/clips/bf8498f6-aa77-4024-b49e-b2710069720f/transcript

1. Core Dispute: “Imminent Threat”
Democrats argue there was no credible intelligence showing Iran posed an immediate or imminent threat to the U.S.
Republicans and the Trump administration counter that imminence is a presidential determination, not solely an intelligence community judgment.
This disagreement is framed as the central justification debate for military action.

2. Democratic Position
Democratic leaders, including Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, state that:

Classified briefings did not show evidence of an imminent attack.
The action amounted to a “war of choice”.
The conflict has expanded regionally and resulted in U.S. service member deaths.
Democrats are portrayed by the narrator as politicizing casualties.

3. Administration & Republican Position
The Trump administration argues:

Iran has been a long-term, evolving threat for decades.
Waiting for a visible attack would endanger American lives.
Military strikes significantly degraded Iran’s nuclear and missile capabilities.
Speaker Mike Johnson and others claim intelligence was “exquisite” and clearly justified action.

4. Intelligence Community Tension
Director of National Intelligence (Gabbard) asserts:

Intelligence agencies assess capabilities and intent, not imminence.
The president alone decides what constitutes an imminent threat.
This position is challenged by Democratic senators, who argue that assessing imminence is part of intelligence responsibility.

5. Joe Kent Controversy
Former National Counterterrorism Center Director Joe Kent:

Publicly questioned the imminence of the Iranian threat.
Resigned and is reportedly under FBI investigation for alleged classified leaks.
The text portrays Kent as:

Contradicting his prior statements.
Acting as an outlier.
Potentially undermining national security.

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

1. Core Dispute: &ldquo;Imminent Threat&rdquo;
<ul>
<li>Democrats argue there was no credible intelligence showing Iran posed an immediate or imminent threat to the U.S.</li>
<li>Republicans and the Trump administration counter that imminence is a presidential determination, not solely an intelligence community judgment.</li>
<li>This disagreement is framed as the central justification debate for military action.</li>
</ul>
<hr>
2. Democratic Position
<ul>
<li>Democratic leaders, including Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, state that:
<ul>
<li>Classified briefings did not show evidence of an imminent attack.</li>
<li>The action amounted to a &ldquo;war of choice&rdquo;.</li>
<li>The conflict has expanded regionally and resulted in U.S. service member deaths.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Democrats are portrayed by the narrator as politicizing casualties.</li>
</ul>
<hr>
3. Administration &amp; Republican Position
<ul>
<li>The Trump administration argues:
<ul>
<li>Iran has been a long-term, evolving threat for decades.</li>
<li>Waiting for a visible attack would endanger American lives.</li>
<li>Military strikes significantly degraded Iran&rsquo;s nuclear and missile capabilities.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Speaker Mike Johnson and others claim intelligence was &ldquo;exquisite&rdquo; and clearly justified action.</li>
</ul>
<hr>
4. Intelligence Community Tension
<ul>
<li>Director of National Intelligence (Gabbard) asserts:
<ul>
<li>Intelligence agencies assess capabilities and intent, not imminence.</li>
<li>The president alone decides what constitutes an imminent threat.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>This position is challenged by Democratic senators, who argue that assessing imminence is part of intelligence responsibility.</li>
</ul>
<hr>
5. Joe Kent Controversy
<ul>
<li>Former National Counterterrorism Center Director Joe Kent:
<ul>
<li>Publicly questioned the imminence of the Iranian threat.</li>
<li>Resigned and is reportedly under FBI investigation for alleged classified leaks.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The text portrays Kent as:
<ul>
<li>Contradicting his prior statements.</li>
<li>Acting as an outlier.</li>
<li>Potentially undermining national security.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the&nbsp;<a href="https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpodcasts.apple.com%2Fus%2Fpodcast%2Fthe-ben-ferguson-podcast%2Fid1386375601&amp;data=05%7C02%7CRobertoDiaz%40iheartmedia.com%7Cd55f297ce8824f6f31a808dddbf7fab7%7C122a527e5b714eba878d9810b495b9e3%7C0%7C0%7C638908580290104132%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=RRil7WRhuVH0YkqvMtYlSMRSI71cvsxmUy24iRBm1e8%3D&amp;reserved=0" data-auth="NotApplicable" data-linkindex="6">The Ben Ferguson Show</a> Podcast and <a href="https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1119-verdict-with-ted-cruz-56253661/" data-auth="NotApplicable" data-linkindex="4">Verdict with Ted Cruz</a> Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X:&nbsp;<a href="https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fx.com%2Fbenfergusonshow&amp;data=05%7C02%7CRobertoDiaz%40iheartmedia.com%7Cd55f297ce8824f6f31a808dddbf7fab7%7C122a527e5b714eba878d9810b495b9e3%7C0%7C0%7C638908580290178175%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=toMizYItYEpQnaEde%2BnCLJEal7XzVD%2BzvBtrHUIgbc4%3D&amp;reserved=0" data-auth="NotApplicable" data-linkindex="10">https://x.com/benfergusonshow</a>

Democrats Second‑Guess as Administration Says Iran Left No Time to Wait

https://api.omny.fm/orgs/e73c998e-6e60-432f-8610-ae210140c5b1/clips/e66d074a-32a7-4a83-a0c1-b40500568e51/transcript

1. California Firearm Advertising Law Struck Down
California agreed to a settlement exceeding $1.3 million in attorney fees after losing a lawsuit over its “marketing firearms to minors” law.
The law effectively banned most firearm advertising, arguing it could appeal to minors.
The lawsuit was brought by the Second Amendment Foundation, Firearms Policy Coalition, and other plaintiffs.

Core Argument Presented
The law violated the First Amendment by banning truthful, lawful advertising.
It was also framed as an indirect attempt to undermine the Second Amendment by financially crippling gun stores.

2. Ninth Circuit Ruling and Judicial Reasoning
A Ninth Circuit judge (Judge Lee, September 2023) ruled against the law.
The opinion stated:

The law did not materially advance California’s goal of reducing gun violence.
There was no evidence minors had illegally purchased firearms due to advertising.
The court highlighted a contradiction:

California allows minors to use firearms legally (e.g., hunting, sport shooting),
Yet banned advertising about those same lawful activities.

3. Governor Gavin Newsom Criticism
Governor Newsom is portrayed as acting emotionally and irrationally, particularly over:

A .22 caliber rifle designed for youth shooters.
The text argues:

Youth firearms are legally owned by parents, not children.
Such firearms are common for hunting and training.
The financial cost to taxpayers is emphasized as a political failure.

4. Broader National Implications
The case is framed as a warning to other states:

Similar laws will fail and result in costly defeats.
The victory is presented as:

A win for constitutional rights
A success made possible only by organizations with “deep pockets”

5. Shift to Federal Politics: The SAVE Act
The second half shifts focus to the U.S. Senate debate over the SAVE Act.
The bill is framed as an election integrity measure.
Core premise:

“Only American citizens should decide American elections.”

6. President Trump’s Leadership Role
Trump is portrayed as:

Personally directing the strategy
Pressuring Republicans to unify
Making the bill a top priority
The effort is described as deliberate and strategic, not symbolic.

7. Republican vs. Democrat Contrast
Republicans:

Unified
On offense
Advocating for voter ID and proof of citizenship
Democrats:

Described as unanimously opposed
Framed as defending an “impossible” position
The debate is positioned as a midterm election defining issue.

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

1. California Firearm Advertising Law Struck Down
<ul>
<li>California agreed to a settlement exceeding $1.3 million in attorney fees after losing a lawsuit over its &ldquo;marketing firearms to minors&rdquo; law.</li>
<li>The law effectively banned most firearm advertising, arguing it could appeal to minors.</li>
<li>The lawsuit was brought by the Second Amendment Foundation, Firearms Policy Coalition, and other plaintiffs.</li>
</ul>
Core Argument Presented
<ul>
<li>The law violated the First Amendment by banning truthful, lawful advertising.</li>
<li>It was also framed as an indirect attempt to undermine the Second Amendment by financially crippling gun stores.</li>
</ul>
<hr>
2. Ninth Circuit Ruling and Judicial Reasoning
<ul>
<li>A Ninth Circuit judge (Judge Lee, September 2023) ruled against the law.</li>
<li>The opinion stated:
<ul>
<li>The law did not materially advance California&rsquo;s goal of reducing gun violence.</li>
<li>There was no evidence minors had illegally purchased firearms due to advertising.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The court highlighted a contradiction:
<ul>
<li>California allows minors to use firearms legally (e.g., hunting, sport shooting),</li>
<li>Yet banned advertising about those same lawful activities.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<hr>
3. Governor Gavin Newsom Criticism
<ul>
<li>Governor Newsom is portrayed as acting emotionally and irrationally, particularly over:
<ul>
<li>A .22 caliber rifle designed for youth shooters.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The text argues:
<ul>
<li>Youth firearms are legally owned by parents, not children.</li>
<li>Such firearms are common for hunting and training.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The financial cost to taxpayers is emphasized as a political failure.</li>
</ul>
<hr>
4. Broader National Implications
<ul>
<li>The case is framed as a warning to other states:
<ul>
<li>Similar laws will fail and result in costly defeats.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The victory is presented as:
<ul>
<li>A win for constitutional rights</li>
<li>A success made possible only by organizations with &ldquo;deep pockets&rdquo;</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<hr>
5. Shift to Federal Politics: The SAVE Act
<ul>
<li>The second half shifts focus to the U.S. Senate debate over the SAVE Act.</li>
<li>The bill is framed as an election integrity measure.</li>
<li>Core premise:
<ul>
<li>&ldquo;Only American citizens should decide American elections.&rdquo;</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<hr>
6. President Trump&rsquo;s Leadership Role
<ul>
<li>Trump is portrayed as:
<ul>
<li>Personally directing the strategy</li>
<li>Pressuring Republicans to unify</li>
<li>Making the bill a top priority</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The effort is described as deliberate and strategic, not symbolic.</li>
</ul>
<hr>
7. Republican vs. Democrat Contrast
<ul>
<li>Republicans:
<ul>
<li>Unified</li>
<li>On offense</li>
<li>Advocating for voter ID and proof of citizenship</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Democrats:
<ul>
<li>Described as unanimously opposed</li>
<li>Framed as defending an &ldquo;impossible&rdquo; position</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The debate is positioned as a midterm election defining issue.</li>
</ul>
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the&nbsp;<a href="https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpodcasts.apple.com%2Fus%2Fpodcast%2Fthe-ben-ferguson-podcast%2Fid1386375601&amp;data=05%7C02%7CRobertoDiaz%40iheartmedia.com%7Cd55f297ce8824f6f31a808dddbf7fab7%7C122a527e5b714eba878d9810b495b9e3%7C0%7C0%7C638908580290104132%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=RRil7WRhuVH0YkqvMtYlSMRSI71cvsxmUy24iRBm1e8%3D&amp;reserved=0" data-auth="NotApplicable" data-linkindex="6">The Ben Ferguson Show</a> Podcast and <a href="https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1119-verdict-with-ted-cruz-56253661/" data-auth="NotApplicable" data-linkindex="4">Verdict with Ted Cruz</a> Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X:&nbsp;<a href="https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fx.com%2Fbenfergusonshow&amp;data=05%7C02%7CRobertoDiaz%40iheartmedia.com%7Cd55f297ce8824f6f31a808dddbf7fab7%7C122a527e5b714eba878d9810b495b9e3%7C0%7C0%7C638908580290178175%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=toMizYItYEpQnaEde%2BnCLJEal7XzVD%2BzvBtrHUIgbc4%3D&amp;reserved=0" data-auth="NotApplicable" data-linkindex="10">https://x.com/benfergusonshow</a>

Newsom’s Gun Grab Backfires plus Day Two of SAA Fight-Dems Dig In & Republicans Take the Offensive

https://api.omny.fm/orgs/e73c998e-6e60-432f-8610-ae210140c5b1/clips/8ff6b673-6fc4-425c-8710-b40500566417/transcript

1. SAVE Act as an Election Integrity Measure
The SAVE Act is requiring voter ID and proof of U.S. citizenship to vote in federal elections.
Supporters frame the bill as “common sense” and essential to ensuring that only U.S. citizens vote.
Mail-in voting is repeatedly described as corrupt, and the Act is positioned as a corrective to that system.

2. Strong Emphasis on Public Support
Polling overwhelmingly favors voter ID and proof-of-citizenship requirements (described as “three-to-one” support).
The issue is mainstream, not partisan, with opposition portrayed as out of step with public opinion.

3. Expansion Beyond Elections

The SAVE Act discussion is bundled with other controversial issues:
Transgender participation in women’s sports
Opposition to gender-affirming medical care for minors
Restrictions on mail-in voting

These issues are enjoying near-universal public support

4. Senate Procedural Reality
Senate Majority Leader John Thune acknowledges that the bill likely cannot reach the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster.
The expected vote count is described as 50–52 votes, short of passage.
The leadership argues that even a failed vote is meaningful because it:

Forces senators “on record”
Sets up campaign messaging for upcoming elections

5. Internal Republican Divisions
Senator Ted Cruz explains that passing the bill without 60 votes would require:

All 50 Republican senators to remain physically present
Willingness to engage in prolonged procedural fights lasting days or weeks
Cruz admits Republicans currently do not have the unity needed to execute this strategy.

6. Role of Donald Trump
Trump is:

Strongly supportive
Actively pressuring Senate Republicans
Willing to publicly criticize senators who do not fight harder
He is the key “X factor” who might sway undecided Republicans through personal intervention.

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

1. SAVE Act as an Election Integrity Measure
<ul>
<li>The SAVE Act is requiring voter ID and proof of U.S. citizenship to vote in federal elections.</li>
<li>Supporters frame the bill as &ldquo;common sense&rdquo; and essential to ensuring that only U.S. citizens vote.</li>
<li>Mail-in voting is repeatedly described as corrupt, and the Act is positioned as a corrective to that system.</li>
</ul>
<hr>
2. Strong Emphasis on Public Support
<ul>
<li>Polling overwhelmingly favors voter ID and proof-of-citizenship requirements (described as &ldquo;three-to-one&rdquo; support).</li>
<li>The issue is mainstream, not partisan, with opposition portrayed as out of step with public opinion.</li>
</ul>
<hr>
3. Expansion Beyond Elections
The SAVE Act discussion is bundled with other controversial issues:
<ul>
<li>Transgender participation in women&rsquo;s sports</li>
<li>Opposition to gender-affirming medical care for minors</li>
<li>Restrictions on mail-in voting</li>
</ul>
These issues are enjoying&nbsp;near-universal public support
<hr>
4. Senate Procedural Reality
<ul>
<li>Senate Majority Leader John Thune acknowledges that the bill likely cannot reach the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster.</li>
<li>The expected vote count is described as 50&ndash;52 votes, short of passage.</li>
<li>The leadership argues that even a failed vote is meaningful because it:
<ul>
<li>Forces senators &ldquo;on record&rdquo;</li>
<li>Sets up campaign messaging for upcoming elections</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<hr>
5. Internal Republican Divisions
<ul>
<li>Senator Ted Cruz explains that passing the bill without 60 votes would require:
<ul>
<li>All 50 Republican senators to remain physically present</li>
<li>Willingness to engage in prolonged procedural fights lasting days or weeks</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Cruz admits Republicans currently do not have the unity needed to execute this strategy.</li>
</ul>
<hr>
6. Role of Donald Trump
<ul>
<li>Trump is:
<ul>
<li>Strongly supportive</li>
<li>Actively pressuring Senate Republicans</li>
<li>Willing to publicly criticize senators who do not fight harder</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>He is the key &ldquo;X factor&rdquo; who might sway undecided Republicans through personal intervention.</li>
</ul>
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the&nbsp;<a href="https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpodcasts.apple.com%2Fus%2Fpodcast%2Fthe-ben-ferguson-podcast%2Fid1386375601&amp;data=05%7C02%7CRobertoDiaz%40iheartmedia.com%7Cd55f297ce8824f6f31a808dddbf7fab7%7C122a527e5b714eba878d9810b495b9e3%7C0%7C0%7C638908580290104132%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=RRil7WRhuVH0YkqvMtYlSMRSI71cvsxmUy24iRBm1e8%3D&amp;reserved=0" data-auth="NotApplicable" data-linkindex="6">The Ben Ferguson Show</a> Podcast and <a href="https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1119-verdict-with-ted-cruz-56253661/" data-auth="NotApplicable" data-linkindex="4">Verdict with Ted Cruz</a> Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X:&nbsp;<a href="https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fx.com%2Fbenfergusonshow&amp;data=05%7C02%7CRobertoDiaz%40iheartmedia.com%7Cd55f297ce8824f6f31a808dddbf7fab7%7C122a527e5b714eba878d9810b495b9e3%7C0%7C0%7C638908580290178175%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=toMizYItYEpQnaEde%2BnCLJEal7XzVD%2BzvBtrHUIgbc4%3D&amp;reserved=0" data-auth="NotApplicable" data-linkindex="10">https://x.com/benfergusonshow</a>

ID for DNC, But Not to Vote? Cheating over Fair Elections — Senate Libs prepare to KILL the SAA

https://api.omny.fm/orgs/e73c998e-6e60-432f-8610-ae210140c5b1/clips/c7be5c5d-df28-413e-809f-b40500563eb3/transcript

US Gaza Take Over & Ukraine Admits 100billion Missing in US Aid

In 2 playlist(s)

The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson

Social links

Follow podcast

Recent clips