You're listening to the Weekend Collective podcast from News Talks EDB Politics Central.

You're listening to the Weekend Collective podcast from News Talks EDB Politics Central.

So yes, you will have heard the news that two participants of the Youth Offender boot camp were missing after attending a went missing after attending a Tonguey. Police were responding to a carjacking and Hamilton where they found the two teens, who now look to be in some legal trouble. Surprise, surprise, not their first encounter. I guess the first youth to go missing was on bail following a court hearing and was supposed to be accompanied by two ordering a Tamaiki staff. Anyway to discuss that, Labour's police spokesperson Jenny Anderson is with me now, good.

So yes, you will have heard the news that two participants of the Youth Offender boot camp were missing after attending a went missing after attending a Tonguey. Police were responding to a carjacking and Hamilton where they found the two teens, who now look to be in some legal trouble. Surprise, surprise, not their first encounter. I guess the first youth to go missing was on bail following a court hearing and was supposed to be accompanied by two ordering a Tamaiki staff. Anyway to discuss that, Labour's police spokesperson Jenny Anderson is with me now, good.

Afternoon, chowder, good afternoon.

Afternoon, chowder, good afternoon.

So actually just on the on the absconding when they're supposed to have I rang a Tamaiki people with them, and if so is sort of part of this problem on them?

So actually just on the on the absconding when they're supposed to have I rang a Tamaiki people with them, and if so is sort of part of this problem on them?

I think there are some big questions. The Minister won't be pleased to be able to have to ask. For a start, she was embarrassed when she wasn't even informed that the second young person and had absconded. There's a duty of officials to keep their minister informed. So I think the whole thing has been a big mess, not just for the minister, but for on a commod e as well.

I think there are some big questions. The Minister won't be pleased to be able to have to ask. For a start, she was embarrassed when she wasn't even informed that the second young person and had absconded. There's a duty of officials to keep their minister informed. So I think the whole thing has been a big mess, not just for the minister, but for on a commod e as well.

Is it just a reality that things are going to go wrong or what are your expectations from the I don't like to use the word book camps. We've got to find another word for it.

Is it just a reality that things are going to go wrong or what are your expectations from the I don't like to use the word book camps. We've got to find another word for it.

But you know what I mean is military styled training academies is the proper word. But it's quite long, isn't it. The evidence we've always said right from the get go is that these models don't work. They've been trialed in the past and all of the analysis shows they fail. What does work is programs in place now, like called Tahite Picaro in South Auckland. We know that about eighty percent of young people who go through those programs don't reoffend, and so we should be keep we should keep doing those programs. And it's really incumbent upon the government to explain why. I think it's around thirty six million dollars has been invested into a pilot where there's just no evidence that it works.

But you know what I mean is military styled training academies is the proper word. But it's quite long, isn't it. The evidence we've always said right from the get go is that these models don't work. They've been trialed in the past and all of the analysis shows they fail. What does work is programs in place now, like called Tahite Picaro in South Auckland. We know that about eighty percent of young people who go through those programs don't reoffend, and so we should be keep we should keep doing those programs. And it's really incumbent upon the government to explain why. I think it's around thirty six million dollars has been invested into a pilot where there's just no evidence that it works.

The Children's the Chief Children's Commissioner doesn't believe the program has failed, and her comment was because you mentioned we talk about the military style academy, the language of it. She said, I saw how hard the staff there were working to put in place that multi disciplinary support around these young people, and she said she didn't see anything that was vaguely military. Is she wrong?

The Children's the Chief Children's Commissioner doesn't believe the program has failed, and her comment was because you mentioned we talk about the military style academy, the language of it. She said, I saw how hard the staff there were working to put in place that multi disciplinary support around these young people, and she said she didn't see anything that was vaguely military. Is she wrong?

Well, this is where it's unclear. Why is the government calling these programs military style and training academy if they're not military? Why do the children have uniforms and boots if they're not military? So the government can't have it both ways. That the military style component is in there, but where yet to see any evidence from that evaluation as to how successful that component of the course is.

Well, this is where it's unclear. Why is the government calling these programs military style and training academy if they're not military? Why do the children have uniforms and boots if they're not military? So the government can't have it both ways. That the military style component is in there, but where yet to see any evidence from that evaluation as to how successful that component of the course is.

Where are you at with it? Do you think? I mean, how long do you think we should persist with the idea? Because the evidence that people are calling for is from the military style academies, but these seem to be different. So how long would you give it or would you pull the plug?

Where are you at with it? Do you think? I mean, how long do you think we should persist with the idea? Because the evidence that people are calling for is from the military style academies, but these seem to be different. So how long would you give it or would you pull the plug?

Now?

Now?

I think we have to be clear that the government has lost control of this one. We've not only had a tragic fatality, but too further have absconded ones with a machete and attempted to kajack members of the public. The Minister hasn't been informed of this. I mean, we had officials Intellect Committee on Friday telling us that we're not going to give up or we're going to keep trying no matter what. They're a real consume that the government is continuing to push on with a program that is just causing damage not only to those young people, but also putting our community at risk.

I think we have to be clear that the government has lost control of this one. We've not only had a tragic fatality, but too further have absconded ones with a machete and attempted to kajack members of the public. The Minister hasn't been informed of this. I mean, we had officials Intellect Committee on Friday telling us that we're not going to give up or we're going to keep trying no matter what. They're a real consume that the government is continuing to push on with a program that is just causing damage not only to those young people, but also putting our community at risk.

Are you saying that the programs caused those people to go off and hijack a car.

Are you saying that the programs caused those people to go off and hijack a car.

Not saying the program is, but the program's not working properly if those things are happening.

Not saying the program is, but the program's not working properly if those things are happening.

So, I mean the thing is the problem is it's not going to be perfect. How would you define success for these programs when.

So, I mean the thing is the problem is it's not going to be perfect. How would you define success for these programs when.

You have full wrap around support to the whole far No, we know that works. Programs like FastTrak, it called Taheite picardl have continued to be funded by this government because they know that's what actually works. When you look at mum and dad, sisters, brothers, making sure these school uniforms, these lunches to go to school, all of those things take time and take efforts up to eighteen months and instances that I've seen, you know, a short term intervention that has a military framework has just no real hope of succeeding. And the real problem I see is that government is pushing through legislation to create this new young serious youth offender despite there being no evidence or evaluation from the Spook camp.

You have full wrap around support to the whole far No, we know that works. Programs like FastTrak, it called Taheite picardl have continued to be funded by this government because they know that's what actually works. When you look at mum and dad, sisters, brothers, making sure these school uniforms, these lunches to go to school, all of those things take time and take efforts up to eighteen months and instances that I've seen, you know, a short term intervention that has a military framework has just no real hope of succeeding. And the real problem I see is that government is pushing through legislation to create this new young serious youth offender despite there being no evidence or evaluation from the Spook camp.

I guess eventually the evidence would come. So is there a level of success? So so, obviously nothing's perfect. Prisons not perfect either. We don't get people rehabilitated in there. But if it does turn around a few lives, will it have been worth it?

I guess eventually the evidence would come. So is there a level of success? So so, obviously nothing's perfect. Prisons not perfect either. We don't get people rehabilitated in there. But if it does turn around a few lives, will it have been worth it?

The question is that thirty six million investment in this space a good spend for taxpayers money when we know that other programs with full rip around support are giving eighty eighty percent not reoffending in that space. I guess my view would be that's a better investment.

The question is that thirty six million investment in this space a good spend for taxpayers money when we know that other programs with full rip around support are giving eighty eighty percent not reoffending in that space. I guess my view would be that's a better investment.

I guess if it's the worst offenders, though, do we need to have a multitude of approaches? And you talk about the thirty six million for this and the other programs that you that you've said you support, But is there room for something like this, maybe even if we rename it because the military name is kind of problematic, isn't it.

I guess if it's the worst offenders, though, do we need to have a multitude of approaches? And you talk about the thirty six million for this and the other programs that you that you've said you support, But is there room for something like this, maybe even if we rename it because the military name is kind of problematic, isn't it.

Well they've come out saying this this is a flagship they've hung a lot on that as a brand, and so that's that's what the concern is, that they've simply hung out a brand of being tough on crime by having these military style of candidies, but there's simply no good evident to show they actually work in tuning lives around. It's the wrap around services. It's the additional support to give family, families life coping measures and support to be able to deal with their own issues without having to rely on police or ordering a COMMODIQI to step in every inch of the way.

Well they've come out saying this this is a flagship they've hung a lot on that as a brand, and so that's that's what the concern is, that they've simply hung out a brand of being tough on crime by having these military style of candidies, but there's simply no good evident to show they actually work in tuning lives around. It's the wrap around services. It's the additional support to give family, families life coping measures and support to be able to deal with their own issues without having to rely on police or ordering a COMMODIQI to step in every inch of the way.

So what about the Children's commissioner then, who doesn't want to see it. It doesn't sound like she wants to see it. Throw on it. He actually said, it doesn't mean the program has failed. Where do you balance your comments versus her sort of cautious support for it.

So what about the Children's commissioner then, who doesn't want to see it. It doesn't sound like she wants to see it. Throw on it. He actually said, it doesn't mean the program has failed. Where do you balance your comments versus her sort of cautious support for it.

We'd like to see more of the wrap around full support. If that works, then that's a great thing. I want to stress to you that we all aren't a risk to themselves or to those around them. But we just don't agree on the method of military style academies to achieve that outcome. Okay, But if there are parts of it that are wrap around support that the commit that the Children's Commissioner likes. That's great point. We just don't think they need uniforms of the book camp, okay.

We'd like to see more of the wrap around full support. If that works, then that's a great thing. I want to stress to you that we all aren't a risk to themselves or to those around them. But we just don't agree on the method of military style academies to achieve that outcome. Okay, But if there are parts of it that are wrap around support that the commit that the Children's Commissioner likes. That's great point. We just don't think they need uniforms of the book camp, okay.

If we actually I mean, it sounds such a trivial thing, and I don't mean it to be, but it's one of the things I've been thinking about. The name is just so problematic. What if it was called something like a youth development academy or a youth reform initiative And because it might not look any different from what the Children's Commission has described, it sounds like it could equally fit under that heading. I mean, it sounds trivial, but would that change your focus be something you think, well, that's at least a step in the right direction.

If we actually I mean, it sounds such a trivial thing, and I don't mean it to be, but it's one of the things I've been thinking about. The name is just so problematic. What if it was called something like a youth development academy or a youth reform initiative And because it might not look any different from what the Children's Commission has described, it sounds like it could equally fit under that heading. I mean, it sounds trivial, but would that change your focus be something you think, well, that's at least a step in the right direction.

If the government wanted to change their position and no longer call them military style academies, we would be incredibly supportive of that. We know that does not work. But the problem is that the act Party campaigned hard on having this tough on crime approach where boot camps would be straightening out our young people and pulling them up by their bootstraps, and that was the approach. The reality is it's that part that does not work. There's no evidence of that it's giving people good support and life skills to be able to grow up without causing harm to themselves or others. In the military style part simply doesn't work.

If the government wanted to change their position and no longer call them military style academies, we would be incredibly supportive of that. We know that does not work. But the problem is that the act Party campaigned hard on having this tough on crime approach where boot camps would be straightening out our young people and pulling them up by their bootstraps, and that was the approach. The reality is it's that part that does not work. There's no evidence of that it's giving people good support and life skills to be able to grow up without causing harm to themselves or others. In the military style part simply doesn't work.

So there could be a future for if we're given what we've just discussed now about the change of the emphasis.

So there could be a future for if we're given what we've just discussed now about the change of the emphasis.

Well, if they did what they're already doing, which has been going on for about eight or nine years, which is fast track in quota dificado. Those programs work. If they keep doing that, we're behind it. But calling them little soldiers is a failure.

Well, if they did what they're already doing, which has been going on for about eight or nine years, which is fast track in quota dificado. Those programs work. If they keep doing that, we're behind it. But calling them little soldiers is a failure.

Okay, Hey, Jenny, thanks very much for your time. Really appreciate it. And when do you take When do you guys go and break?

Okay, Hey, Jenny, thanks very much for your time. Really appreciate it. And when do you take When do you guys go and break?

I thank the house rives around the nineteenth of December, so two more weeks of happening.

I thank the house rives around the nineteenth of December, so two more weeks of happening.

No secret Sanders in Parliament are there?

No secret Sanders in Parliament are there?

I did hear that? How inappropriate would your guest have to be in order to get appired for it? Mind boggles?

I did hear that? How inappropriate would your guest have to be in order to get appired for it? Mind boggles?

Google Tesco manager and you'll find Mery Christmas Dove. Jenny, Thanks very.

Google Tesco manager and you'll find Mery Christmas Dove. Jenny, Thanks very.

Much for more from the Weekend Collective. Listen live to News Talk z'd be weekends from three pm, or follow the podcast on iHeartRadio.

Much for more from the Weekend Collective. Listen live to News Talk z'd be weekends from three pm, or follow the podcast on iHeartRadio.