Jigar Shah Just Became One of the Most Important Players in the Energy Transition

Published Oct 17, 2022, 8:00 AM

Jigar Shah is the director of the loan office at the Department of Energy. For years, this division has had a modest amount of money, which it used to provide financing to promising projects in energy technology. With the passage of the Inflation Reduction Act, the loan office now has hundreds of billions of dollars at its disposal in order to build up US energy supply and accelerate the shift to renewables. We talked Jigar about how he plans to scale up his office and deploy that money in a productive way. Recorded on September 7th, 2022.

Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast. I'm Joe Wasn't All and I'm Tracy Hallaway. Tracy, you know, we have guests come back on the show from time to time, and we have guests come on multiple times, but it's not every day or it's not common that we have a guest and then not long not long thereafter, something major happens to them and they're in the center of the news and we immediately have to get them back. No, that's true. So you make it sound like a bad thing, but it's a good thing. This is a good thing. So one of the things that happened earlier this year we had the Inflation Reduction Act that got passed and tucked inside that very big act is three hundred fifty billion dollars that our previous all thoughts guest gets to play around with invest Yeah, so earlier in the year we spoke with a Jigger Shaw. He has the head of the loan program at the Department of Energy, and I think that he had a loan budget somewhere around uh, you know, thirty billion essentially away from the public sector to provide backstop or provide accelerated financing for new energy technologies. Kind of an interesting conversation, but I don't think you on the grand scheme of the energy transition, you necessarily expect thirty billion dollars to really move the needle, right, but three billion might do right. So, as part of the Inflation Reduction Act in August, the you know, there's a lot in there. It's a huge bill, much of it related to climate, energy transition, energy security. Tucked into that bill basically is money that will turn the loan program at the Department of Energy into a major player. It now has, as you said, over a three hundred billion dollars to lend out to accelerate clean energy finance. And so rather than just being sort of this small office jigger, our guest is a crucial player in the energy transition. Yeah, a major player. So we should definitely talk to him about what's interesting him right now and how he might actually deploy some of that money. Jigger. Thank you so much for coming back on odd lots. Thanks for having me back. So this is very exciting. Let's go really big picture to start talk to us about what you had to deploy or sort of the size of the d OE loan office when we talked to you in June when it didn't look like there was going to be some major changes, and now what the law means for your role. Yeah, Look, I think that the Loan Program's Office has always played a critical role in figuring out how to get debt into infrastructure right. Infrastructure projects don't get built to make unlevered returns. They generally need an equity debt split, and debt really doesn't want to get involved early in technologies that it it perceives as risking. And so you have this fundamental disconnect where you've got a bunch of awesome R and D happening at the Department of Energy and a lot of technologies that gather dust waiting to get deployed at scale because first of a kind deployments are really difficult. So our office has put about thirty five billion dollars out the door, mostly in two thousand nine and and then has roughly thirty nine billion dollars left to deploy into what's called seventeen O three Titles seventeen, which is where a lot of the solar and wind projects got funded. We had the a t v M, the Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing Program, which is where Tesla and Ford got their loans. And then we have the Tribal Energy Loan Guarantee Program. So that's what we had when we last talked, was roughly around thirty nine billion dollars of remaining authority, and then we got more out of the Inflation Reduction Act, almost ten times more. So I have a conceptual question about the program. And I know it's been going on for a while. You mentioned the loans to Tesla and Ford, but why did the government or the Department settle on loans versus grants? Like what was the thinking there? Well, we do both, right, So I mean we have the federal government, you can do both. So we have the Office of Cleanergy Demonstration, which has over twenty billion dollars worth of grants that I can put out the door, and I think it got an additional eight billion in the Inflation Reduction Act for industrial decarb But ultimately grants don't actually cross help you cross the bridge to bank ability. Right, So when you think about where we are in the commercialization spectrum, we have a whole bunch of technologies that work right that we it physically works in the lab, in the national laboratories, etcetera. And then you need a demonstration projects, and those demonstration projects are generally at a quarter scale, half scale something like that, and you end up getting grants for that, right, and then those grants are really useful in proving that technology, not just that the underlying technology works, but also that the that the operations and some of those pieces which are softer skills, that those actually work as well. But then you're still left with the technology that commercial banks don't want to fund, and in that case, you really do want loans. And when you talk to Wall Street banks and other banks um in the United States and elsewhere, they really do look to us to go first. And when we go first, they are watching us very carefully and say, wow, that was a great way that you under wrote that loan. We are now going to do the next ten loans. And if we didn't do that first loan, they wouldn't have done the next ten. Can you talk a little bit more about Post Inflation Reduction Act your office, I mean, Tracy mentioned that now your allocation is, you know, maybe around ten x larger than it was, but it can't just be about there's more dollar amount, like well, talk to us a little bit more about how you're thinking about this new opportunity, this level of uh, this level of cash to work with. Yeah, I mean it's a good question. Look, I think that we have already been very active in the last eighteen months that I've been in office, and so that means that we have I think we just announced today over eighty four active applications now into the office seeking over eighty six billion dollars of loans from our office. Right, So that's the Outreach and Business Development Group. And what I would say here is that there was a serious breakdown and trust between entrepreneurs and growth companies and our office, right because you could imagine after Celindra occurred and you had all the hearings in the Hill, etcetera, people like I don't know if I want to work with this office, And so there getting people to look at this office and to believe that we were going to be a reliable source of loan financing for them was a huge accomplishment. I think over last eighteen months and we've been able to get loans applied for across thirteen sectors. So this includes folks who use natural gases of feedstock to make carbon black and hydrogen like models materials that includes hydrogen storage facility that we talked about and then the last podcast at Delta, Utah. So now you have all these people who have applied, and you now see it the next two hundred potential applicants looking at our office saying, wait a second, maybe I'm missing out on something here. I should be looking at this office more carefully. And so we've now you know, we're going to hire another twenty people in the outreach of business develop and these folks are generally folks who have sold a company, right their senior executives that are sort of looking for ways to give back, and so they're joining our office helping to be an on budsman for their fellow entrepreneurs and saying, look, you know, the water's warm, you should jump in, because remember, these applicants have to spend two to three hours filling out an application. Right, It's no joke. It's not unlike what it would be to get a billion dollar loan out of a commercial bank. It's a full data room. The whole newn yards you mentioned Cylindra, and we should definitely talk about that, but before we do, I just have one more basic question, which is, you know, three fifty billion dollars. Is there some sort of time frame that you have to spend that in. Yeah. So for the title seventeen program, which is seventeen three, that's where the project financ occurs. And then we have a new program called seventeen o six, which is repurposing energy infrastructure so that it can play a you know, continued role in the energy transition, right, so converting a coal plant to a nuclear plant, things like that. That is seventeen o six. Those two programs expire at the end of so we have to put that money out the door over the next four years. And then the Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing Program got an additional forty billion of loan authority, and the Tribal Energy Loan Guarantee Program got an additional twenty billion of loan authority, and those two go through. So when you're thinking about making these loads and something you talk about and I want to talk about the theory a little bit, or the theory of how this changes. And as we talked about last time on the show, and as you've been tweeting about, you know, this really is important in energy tech in particular, for the government to de risk a sector or to establish some credibility or to make that first loan. When you're thinking about these loans, how much are you thinking about, Okay, this is an interesting company, maybe we'll be the next Tesla or something like. This is an interesting company that we have an opportunity to really accelerate, versus this is an interesting sector. And how much are you thinking about making loans not with the express purpose of maybe supporting a company, but trying to really foster an entire industry. And how do you maximize this sort of crowding in effect, so that you create a casscade of investments across players in any given promising space. Yeah, I've got multiple answers probably to your question. I'd say that from a strictly the way that we run our office answer, if you fill out the paperwork and you qualify for the Loan Programs office, then we'll give you money like full stop. Right, So I don't really care if you're going to be the next elon Moscow, You're gonna be the next whatever, if your project meets what we call the reasonable prospect of repayment. We really do operate like a commercial bank. So if I feel like the ingredients of your project means that we're likely to get paid back, then you'll get a loan that's separate from where we do our outreaching business development. So in our outreaching business development, you can imagine we are looking for areas where there is a crowding in already of an ecosystem, right, Because where we fail is if if a company is really amazing, but everyone leaves the space, then then we're stuck with a loan that everyone is basically just you know, trying to make good on for twenty years, but there's no excitement there. I'll give you an example, like solo thermal electric, Right, So these big mirrors in the middle of the desert. We funded a bunch of those Project X right in the first generation. Nobody wants to do that anymore. They're all moved on to solar PV panels and other things. Right. So I'm stuck with a bunch of loans with a bunch of projects that work and their cell power. But you can imagine that there's no enthusiasm in that sector for innovation or anything else. But I still have those loans for twenty years. Tracy, if you've never driven past the Ivan Paw solar mirror farm outside of Las Vegas. It's really incredible. It's just a bunch of mirrors all pointing light at a boy at a big pot of water to get it to boil to spin a turban. But I don't. It's not the most perhaps tech exciting thing, but it is visually very cool to see when you drive by it. Next time I go, don't have to take a look. Actually, this kind of leads into one thing I wanted to ask, which is you mentioned choosing commercially viable projects or things that you think will be able to repay the loan. How do you go about evaluating unproven tech in that category? Because it seems like, you know, if someone comes to you and says, we want to build a big solar farm here, or we want to do geothermal there, that seems like an understood risk or more understood risk. But when people come to you with something completely new, how do you evaluate that? Yeah, so to be clear, we never take technology risk of the loan program's office, right, so we take perceived technology risk. There are a lot of technologies that you probably look at and go that looks risky. But I've got ten thousand engineers, scientists and experts that sit on the d o E platform that have been working on that exact technology for twenty five years, and that technology is not risky to them, and they can show me demonstration project after demonstration project where the underlying concepts around that technology has worked. Now it may not actually work operationally, and that risk we date do take. So, for instance, on the monolith materials deal that we provide a conditional commitment to back last December, that technology is twenty five years old. It basically uses methane pyalysis to split natural gas into carbon black and hydrogen, right, and the carbon black goes to make your tires and the hydrogen is actually quote unquote free, and they're using that to make fertilizer in Nebraska where they need it. Now, if that technology works but they're only able to maintain a fifty up time and the plant, then they're going to barely be able to pay back our loan. But if they if they operate that plant at eight percent up time, which is what they expect to do, they're gonna be hugely profitable. So we're taking that risk, but we're not taking the risk that methane pyrolysis actually works. How do you evaluate where you see the potential for crowding in this because as you mentioned, you know, you could always you could theoretically have a project that pays back, like the solar mirrors, but it's not that exciting. There's not a lot of enthusiasm. It's not going to generate some new industry that massively changes the game a. How do you sort of identify where there's a high likelihood of a sort of more fruitful acceleration And are there any specific areas right now, any subsectors of energy right now that you're looking to that you're thinking, okay, yes, this is something that clearly you can you can add some fuel to the fire. There's definitely a lot of sectors where we're very excited, but let me it might be more instructive to tell you where I'm less excited. Not unlike venture capitalists, you look at the TAM of the market, right, the total addressable market, and you know, like when you look at like, for instance, small hydro right, we have report after report after report showing that that's probably a sixty billion dollar sector. But when you actually go from the TAM to the sam to like the smaller addressable market it might be five billions, right, and then the question becomes, if we put in five million, how do you crowd in a bunch of capital when the total market size might be five billion that they're chasing. It's really hard. But I love hydro right, and geothermal I would say a similar or we have next generation technology which will greatly expand the ability to geothermal. But if you look at or MAT's version of geothermal, for instance, which we funded in the two time frame, that market size is very small. It might be ten or twenty billion dollars total in the United States of that kind of hot rock that we know you can put a well down into and find. And so unless you get enhanced geothermal, which uses advanced fracking technology and other things working, you don't get to trilling our scale, and ultimately trillinged our scale is what saves gigatons of carbon. Right, eight billion dollars doesn't solve gigatons of carbon. So you mentioned Cylindra, and I think we should talk about it because whenever anyone and talks about these loan programs, this is the one that tends to come up or that tends to be brought up by critics. So this was a solar company that borrowed I think it was like half a billion from the Energy Department UM, and then basically defaulted on that. What was that experience like or what did you learn from that particular example. Well, I was on the other side at the time, and you know, I, I and many of my colleagues were telling people, don't do that deal, um. And look, I think the reason that they did the deal was there was probably twelve people working in the office at the time. I think the Bush administration had started the underwriting of that loan. And then you remember we had a financial crisis and we were looking for shove already projects and that project were shove already, right, So mistakes were made, lots of hearings were held, lots of reports are written, and you know, we were given a checklist of fourteen or so things that we should improve in the office. Those have all been improved today to the point where the Office of Management and Budget now believes that we manage risk better than probably every other lending institution in government. So I'm not gonna say that it can never happen again, but I would say that that deal would definitely not make it through today's Loan Program's office. And when we do have failures in our office, which we've had many, right whether it's you know, the Tonempad deal, or whether it's Fisker or Bound Solar or others, we now average fifty five cents on the dollar of recovery. And you know, our total losses for the whole program, including Cylindra, has been roughly three which is the same as a commercial bank portfolio. You mentioned that something like the Cylinder alone wouldn't have gotten through the approval process nowadays. What is it about the process that's changed, Like, what are you doing differently now? Well for manufacturing projects, which is what Cylinder is like. So I'm evaluating the next generation of solar projects, right. So, and in the Inflation Reduction Act, we had a new policy called SEMA that ast which provides an additional incentive to solar manufacturing in the United States. So we've got twenty giga watts of new solar manufacturing applying or having already applied to the Loan Programs Office that we're evaluating, and we're very conservative. Were saying, you know, what are your off take agreements. How solid are those offtake agreements? Are you approven operator of these kinds of plants? Do you know that the solar panels are gonna work? How long will it take to ramp up? Like, I mean, we're really really hard on these applicants. Like Cylinder was a pure startup company. They had never operated a plant like this before. Their product in the field I think had maybe had in that particular version two to three years of total time in the field, and so it had a lot of risks that we would never allow through the program today. So you tweeted recently an interesting thread, but the first you started you say, there's been a central premise that if the technology was ready, then the commercialization would happen. And I kind of that kind of gives me two thoughts, Like one, do people who from say the tech world, and they look at energy or they look at climate, do they have misunderstandings about how energy technology becomes commercialized? Like are their biases that they bring from say consumer tech or business tech where they assume there's like, well this works, it works on my phone, it's better than the last app so I can do the same thing and energy, Like are there things other lessons that don't apply. And then just more broadly, like you know, you talked about these technologies gathering dust, like you talk a little bit more about the theory and like how it comes together and energy specifically, what has to happen for the right technology to meet the moment. I mean there's certainly billionaires who I won't name, who have no energy experience, that have said lots of things that I disagree with around how energy tech gets commercialized. I think in general, what I would say, let me give you an example, and this is true across every sector, but let me give you an example. Like so, if you look at fracking, c Oe basically invented fracking. It was are all of our R and D right. That's been well written about by reporters and journalists. And I think I was involved in fracking projects when I worked at BP right. But at the time, oil prices were like I don't know, like thirty bucks of barrel maybe or twenty bucks of barrel, and so it didn't make any sense. I mean fracking at that time it was about eighty dollars of barrel to profitably frack. But you had these people who were just like I don't care. This is definitely going to change the world, right, Harold Ham and some of these other players, and they just kept doing it. I mean, why the hell would you frack in the back end back in like two thousand and three. It made no sense at all, but he did. He just kept doing it, and he kept raising money, and he kept promising the world to people, this is going to definitely change the world. And then in two thousand and seven, oil prices went to a hundred thirty two dollars a barrel, right, and Harold Ham was suddenly rich. According to Google, he's worth billion dollars. Right. But I mean, but like, in what world did what Harold Ham did make any sense to anybody? Right? But the same thing is true with Elon Musk when he started, you know, when he took over Tesla and then you know, grew it. But the same thing is true with Andy marsh. I don't know if you guys have talked to Andy Marsh over at plug Power when I helped invest in his company while I was a debt provider, when I was to generate in t I think his market cap was three hundred million dollars. Amazon and Walmart had already agreed that they were going to change all of their forklifts, that all of their distribution centers to hydrogen based forklifts because you could have much higher run time. And the payback for Amazon and and Walmart was thirty one days to switch, right, But it still took forever, and you know, they had to raise money, and it was hard and and and today Andy, I don't know what their market cap is now, but it topped out. It like thirty billion dollars billion right now according to YEA. And they are single handedly forcing the world to do green hydrogen. They have I think a fourteen billion dollar order book of backlog of electoralizers that they're selling into Europe. And so there's no rational reason. I think Andy has been CEO of that company for thirteen years maybe, But that is how this works in this country. You have somebody who just feels in their gut that this is gonna happen. And and what's different in the energy space versus the tech space is there's no upside. Right, So let's say you succeed, Let's say you succeed beyond your wildest dreams, right, You're still capped by the cost of natural gas, or the the cost of oil, the cost of the substitute. The only place where that's different is potentially in Tesla, where people are willing to pay a hund. That's interesting. So you could have this breakthrough, you could have some sort of like tech hydrogen breakthrough, fuel cell through green hydrogen, etcetera. But if you go through a long period, I guess where natural gas is cheap or oil is really cheap, it just doesn't matter. You just sort of, I guess what. You wait around your turn until there's a moment when it becomes economical. Yeah, look at the Vocal nuclear plan, right, How many people have written negative stories about the resurgence of nuclear in this country. The Vocal Nuclear plant has now gotten an RC approval right to load fuel into Vocal three. Right, and that facility, Lord Almighty, that timing was perfect. Look at where natural gas prices are today. Southern Company is thinking they're lucky stars that they have new nuclear in their territory right now. Actually, this leads into something else that we wanted to ask you about, which is nuclear and how you're thinking about it and what the opportunity is there? And I guess does it feel like attitudes towards nuclear are starting to shift given some of the energy shortages we've seen this summer. Well, I'll give you two anecdotes. One is that like Diablo Canyon, just reverse their decision and will will extend their life there. This is in the state that invented anti nuclearism. Right. Germany just decided to extend two of their nuclear plants. You know that they were planning to shut down in December, like the Green Party. The only reason the Green Party is even in the government is to shut down the nuclear plants. Right, I mean, yes, things have shifted, right, I mean we're in a situation right now where you look. I love solar and wind. I don't think there's a single person on the planet that you could find who loves it more than I do. But I read models, I look at data. I look at how California runs its grid, how Texas runs its grid. You can't run a well functioning grid without a diversity of resources, and nuclear is the only re source that can scale to the same level that coal and nentrial gases at today at that baseload. And when you look at all the models coming out of the NREL Clean Futures Reports or Princeton or you know, Vibrant Clean Energy or some of the other best in class modelers. They're showing that probably something in the order oft of all of the grid's electricity has to come from what we call clean firm technologies right by the way for solar and wind. To get to six of the grid, we would have to take the current volume, which is around thirty five giga wats a year, increase it to eighty gigawats a year, and then increase it again to a hundred and sixty gig outs here. So no one is taking any like food out of the mouth of babes here. Mhm. Do you think about grid mix and resiliency when you're approving loans, Like would you think like, oh, you know, this could add a backup power source to this particular location, or this is interesting for that like is that something that you try to build in a little bit when you're approving these No. So I mean again, like in terms of who gets loans, it's people who qualified for money from loan program's office. We really are if you fill out the paperwork, can you qualify, Yes, you get money. Now some of those projects pencil because of the grid mix. Right, So like tv A is building to nuclear plans that they announced at Clinch River because they believe it's important for their grid mix. And if tv A then or tv A camp because they're a federal entity. But like if Dominion or Duke or somebody else comes in and says we want to loan, the reason that they rate based that project is because they convince the regulators that they needed that nuclear for their grid mix. And so that part's true. And separately, we get so much data, Like we've evaluated, at a cursory level, a trillion dollars of projects since I've come into office m and so we have better intel on what's happening in the country than any investment bank in the country, right, And so that intel can be used to create like insights for the government and for planning purposes and all that stuff. But the other thing I would say, Tracy, is I feel like one of the things that people get hung up on is that they really feel like just because of spreadsheet models said that it was the best, most optimal structure that that would have any chance of becoming reality, right, Like these are all hard fought winds, and people take it for granted, if you want to build a solar farm somewhere, you have to get approve from the land order, approval from the county, approval from this thing. That person believes that your inverter is going to cause them cancer. You're gonna have to figure out how to talk about white papers. You're gonna do all these things. Every single piece of infrastructure is a struggle. You gotta figure out community benefit agreement, so you got to figure out how to like work with the labor forces in the area, etcetera. And so the modeling helps you to figure out like what should be pursued, But then what actually happens is based on just blood, sweat and tears from these developers in local communities duking it out every day trying to get permission to build something. Going back real quickly to the nuclear question, and you mentioned the Voto plant in Georgia, but more broadly, if nuclear is inevitably going to be part of the low carbon mix and provide low carbon energy at scale, it seems like plants they always seem to be running behind in terms of schedule, over budget, and sort of infamous their technology used that people seem to be excited about within nuclear small reactors, But I don't know that any you're actually getting built or actually like scaling, how are you thinking, like, hey, how are you thinking about the opportunities in nuclear specifically and how you can accelerate it? I don't know. It feels like there's all these exciting opportunities and it just seems extraordinarily difficult. How can you make it easier? Yeah, no, it's a good question. Look, I think the first thing is to recognize the way of a problem, right. I mean, even China, who is trying to force their way through nuclear, is behind schedule and over budget, right, so why is why is everyone like why why can't just so that everyone is on budget? Well, yeah, no, it's over that they added already. I think, um, in general, the like it's about building airplanes, not airports, right so, right now a nuclear plant is built like an airport, where you know a custom design for every single site, and then you like sort of like, oh, the contours of this land is a little bit different than whatever when you look get how a natural gas plant is cited a natural gas plant. Bettel like invented a lot of this, but others have done the same. They won't actually build a natural gas plant for you unless you meet all of their spects. They're like, this site has to be perfect, it has to have this level, it has to have this much land that has to have this, this, this and this, and unless it's all perfect, we're not going to build it for you. Right, that's what we're doing with SMRs. Right, so we're building airplanes. Airplanes are remarkably complex, right, many suppliers, lots of assembly, all this, you know management. But what you do differently is when they started the Vocal nuclear plant, they only had a fifteen completed design. When you have an SMR, you have a percent completed design because you have a hundred percent complete design before you start construction and get all the suppliers locked up and all those things right, and then you build them in a controlled environment where the amount of civil works at the site is less than it is for traditional nuclear because most of it's built in a factory and then brought in pieces to the site to be final assembled. And so so you know, the one that's farthest along in North America, as Giatachi has ten reactor orders right for from Ontario Power Group, for from Saskatchewan Power and then two from t v A, and then the tv A site could be doubled to four sites. Then you've got places like Duke Energy and others who have put three nuclear plants in their i r P plan. They're integrated resource plan, but they don't know which technology they're gonna pick separately. New Scale just made it through the Nuclear Regulatory Commission with a full approval, and so they are working with u AMPS, which is this UH, this group of municipal utilities in Utah to buy power from their first facility. And you have an announcement between Whole Tech International, which is the world's largest producers of casks to sort nuclear waste and energy to build nuclear plants between those two firms. So we'll see who wins, right, It's not my job to pick who wins and loses. It's the utility job to pick which design they want to go for. But I do think that they have a brand new approach here. And the other thing I would say is from a political standpoint, back to what I was saying to you before, Tracy, part of the reason these projects happen is not just because of cost. Part of it happens because of politics. So we have two hundred and sixty five coal plants that have been announced for closure. Right. Each of those communities generally are populations of less than five thousand people, and so half of their budget for their city comes from that coal plant. So that coal plant shuts down, they're gonna lose all the money they have to pay for schools m right, and so they want to replace it with something that's going to pay those property taxes. Separately, you have two hundred union workers those coal plants, and they want to continue to be employed into the future. So you could imagine that community preferring a nuclear plant there over a solar field with battery storage that don't pay as much property tax or have any ongoing operating jobs. I want to go back to sort of where we started, and you know, you have all this money you're you say you're hiring twenty new people, like four years getting it out of the door by that kind of doesn't feel like that much time. I mean, maybe I don't have a great feel, but this seems like a lot of cash that you could potentially deploy, and you know you don't have an infinite amount of time. Can you talk a little bit more about like your sort of plans like right now to scale up your office and how you're thinking about getting the money out the door in a timely manner while also keeping your standards high so that the money, you know, ultimately delivers on the promise of accelerating what the loan office is for. Yeah, so we're definitely hiring more than twenty people are just folks in the outreaching business develop it. But in terms of maybe breaking this down for you a little, so we got a hundred billion dollars of new money into our three existing programs, right so at seventeen three, A t VM and tribal those programs, given the amount of like pipeline we have and all that stuff, those programs should put that money out the door within the time frames allotted. I have no doubt that we have the right mix of entrepreneurs and growth companies who need the money, and the right mix of you know, employees here to process the loans, and so we can get that done. The new program, which is seventeen O six, the charge there is to repurpose energy infrastructure, right so that program does not have an innovation requirement like seventeen three does. So in that program, the requirement is we have to find existing energy infrastructure, right, whether it's been ceased in operations or whether it's operating today, and somebody has to suggest a conversion of that infrastructure into something within the energy transition. Right. So they could convert a coal plant to solar plus storage. They could convert it to you know, nuclear plant. They could take a refinery and co locate monolith materials you know, carbon methande paralysis unit, and then have the excess hydrogen from that unit go into the refinery. They could take an old pipeline, like we have a couple of people of approaches with old pipelines where the natural gas volume is actually low because there's a competing pipeline in the area, and they want to shut down that pipeline and convert it to a CEO two pipeline. Right. So a lot of those projects are really about a community coming together and saying, hey, we actually have all this expertise in our community around energy and around infrastructure, and we'd like to continue to you know, to make money and get tax revenue and all that stuff from that expertise. Let's figure out what we want to repurpose our old energy assets. So that's relevant in this decarbonized world. So this announcement went out as part of the Inflation Reduction Act. What's been the response so far? Have you seen an optic in loan applications? Yeah, we definitely have. And I think that the bigger thing, honestly, is that we have a really weak ecosystem around the loan Program's office. And you know, admittedly because the program's office was largely dormant since so what we really need, and we've been doing a great job of doing this, but we need a whole bunch of like investment banks, commercial banks, you know, the like financial advisory firms, etcetera, to be sending their clients our way, right because a lot of them are getting hired by these entrepreneurs to raise debt for them, and they need to be saying, well, actually, you know, I think it would be easier for you with the loan Program's office because your technology has some of these misunderstood components which I think will make it hard for us to raise debt in the commercial markets. Do you have those relationships? Are they forming such that you're in communication with some of the energy bankers or tech bankers, so they start to Yeah, you can imagine given my yeah, given my background, I've no pretty much all of them, and so we've talked to almost all of them in the last eighteen months. I'd say, look, you know they're bankers, right, they care about earning fees, and so with the IRA passing, they're like, oh, the volumes are much higher. I think I can earn a lot more fees. So you can imagine that a lot of the seeds that we planted twelve months ago or like, they're all coming back going, hey, Jakey, you know that conversation we had were very interested. Now this actually is not a Loan Program office question specifically, but you know, we're recording this on September seven, and over the last two days and I think over the next couple of days. There's a lot of anxiety right now about the grid in California specifically, and they can close last night, I think to maxing out, but they just they managed to avoid wide skill blackouts. But it does raise this concern. It's like, Okay, everyone is going to be putting their cars on the grid with electrification and their stoves and their hot water, et cetera. Is the sort of vision and yet right now the headlines and the stories are about the grid that have trouble keeping up. So we're gonna put all our eggs in this one basket. And I kind of feel like people have a reason to be intuitively nervous about that. Electrification of all these UH industries and appliances seems exciting, except if the grid is itself vulnerable. Why shouldn't people be worried about this direction that we're going in. So are you saying that natural gas pipelines are not vulnerable and that that likes there? And my intuition would be that, well, there's a diversity of sources, so that gas pipelines exist, grids exist, and so forth and at one but we're putting all on the grid now, right or that's the vision or yeah, look, I think that I think the bottom line here is that natural gas was a bridge fuel, right, we all talked about it being a bridge fuel. And clearly what's happening with NORD, you know one and their maintenance issues, what's happening with our l n G community, etcetera. I mean, the United States is on the second half of the bridge, right, Like the bridge was long, it was well built, it had wonderful like bones. But now we're on the other half of the bridge and we're figuring out how we actually moved to something more efficient. Think about how this works today. You burn natural gas to cook, right, it emits all sorts of weird toxins in your in your home when you do that, because natural gas is only pure natural gas and the other two percents other stuff. So you have indoor air quality issues separately. Right. Natural gas in the end, right, is volatile, and you see that now with natural gas prices spiking going into the winter, right, And so you know, we all got lulled into sleep. You know, around how natural gas was super cheap. But remember the two thousand and one California electricity crisis part of what caused that, Yes, en Ron, but also remember natural gas prices spike to like fifteen a million B to you. And then remember in two thousand fine when Leap five when Lee Raymond said all cheap gas has been found in this country and we have reached peak gas. Remember this, and then natural gas prices went up to like I think they're like ten to twelve dollars a million B two in two thousand and seven. Right, then the fracking revolution occurred, and it's great, don't get me wrong. But even with today's prices of natural gas, right, you're seeing not a lot of additional drill rigs and so well, so when you think about where we are today, Look, I'm a huge fan of natural gas, and we should be exporting our lergy around the world so that people aren't burning more coal. But it is way better to use a heat pump, which is three x more efficient than a natural gas you know system right, It is way better to create an heat pump for your water heater than it is something else. On top of that, California is just saying don't charge your car from four to nine pm, not don't charge your car at all. So that means it's like saying, don't fill up your gas tank at the gas station from four to nine pm. It's not, but it's not. But the point is, that's not a thing that's said. Right. When you have a car that is filled by gasoline, you never have to think about that. You fill it up twenty four hours a day. It's just I mean the seventies, you thought about it all the time. Like I, Joe, I I appreciate that we have lived in a period of energy abundance, and we need to get back to a period of energy abundance, which is I think what you're saying, and I think it goes to what Tracy is suggesting, which is planning. It matters, and we need to plan right. And that means that some of these coal plants may have to run a little bit longer before they shut down, so we have adequate excess capacity on the bread and it means that we have to rapidly move to solar and wind and nuclear power and geothermal and other things. Right. But ultimately, when you think about how you actually solve this problem, remember when we talked about it last time, you can solve it a couple of ways. Right, When you have an energy supercycle or a commodity supercycle, you drill for more commodity, Right, you make more electrons. Fine, you use the electrons we have more efficiently. Right. That's a lot of what heat pumps and those kinds of things are, right. They use far less electricity and energy than what they're replacing, right, And we don't do enough of that. It's amazing to me how everyone always just defaults to making more stuff, drilling more stuff, instead of helping people use stuff more efficiently. And then the third one is you have to invest in the substitutes, which is what my office is doing right We're scaling up the substitutes, and we have these demonstration and deployment pathways that we're writing across nuclear, across hydrogen, long duration energy storage, and carbon management. And the reason we're doing that is we're really writing down what is the step process that we need to follow to scale up these technologies, to trilling our scale so that Wall Street and everyone else can follow what we're doing. But but I don't think that we should say that we should you cut off progress because there's bumps in the road during the transition. So I have just one more devil's advocate question. And you've spoken very elegantly about crowding in and scaling up some of these technologies, encouraging Wall Street banks to get interested that sort of thing. Does the risk of crowding out investment, crowding out private investment, which is a classic criticism of government financing for these types of projects. Does the crowding out risk grow once you jump from you know, a budget of thirty nine billion to something like three fifty billion. Does it change along with that scale, we'll see, right, Like, the folks I've talked to have assured me that we're not crowding out the private sector. I would never want to. In general, the the process of going to loan program Program's office is no picnic. I mean, we have made it far more streamline than it was when I got here, but it's still, you know, a pretty involved exercise. If you could go to a commercial bank, I think you would, so I don't think we're in that territory yet, but it's something we have to watch portraits. I totally agree with you, Well, I think this is going to be one of the most sort of interesting I mean, it's obviously there's a lot of money behind it, but I think going to be one of the most interesting things to watch over the next several years, and potentially a model. You know, like people look at the Federal Reserve and they're like their tools are very blunt, raised interest rates and lower them in a way. You know, you are now the head of a sort of like a real, very large government policy bank that can direct capital in certain ways, far more nimble than many of the other operations that we have. So jigger Shop. Thank you so much for coming back on so soon, and I think everybody should be interested in what you do over the next several years. Well, we really appreciate your interests. And honestly, I think it's really more about the fact that these projects have to come together. I can't make them come together. They have to come together. So part of what we've lost the knowledge around is how to bring these projects together, and we're now bringing that back. Is super exciting, and it does seem like one of those things like it's easy thing to say. Like we years ago, we had Bill Janeway, the former VC on the podcast and we were talking about some of this stuff with energy tech and the importance of unlike say consumer tech, of the government providing some of these like backstops and de risking. But it's one thing to say it, or it's one thing to identify, yes, the government needs to have a role, but the actual operationalize that and to do it well and to do it in a cost effective manner and in a timely manner with only a sort of limited time seems like it's going to be a very interesting, interesting challenge, that's for sure. We'll have to have you back on, Jigger, and you can tell us how it's going. Probably not, you know, in another two months this time, but maybe in a year. Yeah, let's check back in next September. I look forward to it. You know, I went to college with Neo cash Cary, so well, we'll both have to have our annual uh. I love that. Yeah, the annual tradition. Thank you so much, Jager, thanks for coming back on. Ye, thank you. Take care Tracy. Obviously, I really like that conversation. I do think to that last point, you know, again, it's one of these things where it's easy to say, in the theory, Okay, we can identify why an energy there is a specific role for the government to play in taking on some of these risks, back stopping this risk. But actually is that How good is the government at it and how much can its scale and make good loans that actually like accelerate this crowding in effect and have a positive effect on accelerating industries I think is a pretty big open question. Still, I like the bit where Jigger said I've one should do what I'm suggesting and think of the planning over the grid mix. That was my favorite part. But I do think there is a tension there between. Like it feels like a lot of these projects sort of I don't know, they almost they happen, and they might make sense, you know, on a local basis or on a narrow basis, but then when you look at them sort of holistically, you start to spot more difficulties, right, or like more issues with the mix, and I wonder, like who is overseeing the whole thing? I mean, that's like that kind of seems like the problem, right. And you know, one of the things that also is being debated in DC right now is the question of permitting reform, and a lot of energy projects in general seemed to hinge on the permitting process, which Jigger talked about, because you know, you set up a solar farm or something, you know, how many local authorities do you need to get? Like there isn't anyone overseeing it, and so like probably in the theory, if you had some sort of entity that could say no, just just put up the land or just put up the put up the photobol takes on the land, it might be easier. But we don't have that kind of system, and so we just have to sort of keep going at it. It sounds like it's like hard work, it's real work. Yeah. I mean that said, like there are these issues and how do you actually put them into place, and how do you overcome some of the permitting issues and things like that. But going from thirty nine billion to billion dollars, I mean that is a big step change. It's a huge change. And then to to his point, which I thought was really interesting, just this idea of like rebuilding that relationship between the office and the Wall Street banks, or the idea that the Wall Street banks would be familiar with the office and now that it has this much money, and obviously we didn't really In the last time we spoke with Jigger, we talked a little bit more about his background in the private sector at Sun Edison, Yeah, creating Sun Edison, and so he has these connections, but like actually like building up that network and bankers knowing to refer people to the Department of Energy when it looks like there's a project that would likely qualify for a loan, like these are all sort of interesting things that will determine whether this is successful or not. Yeah. I mean that's also kind of why I asked the crowding out question as well, because if banks get too comfortable with here's an energy project, let's just send it over to the d OE. That could be problematic too, although in general, I I do think that the government is like the correct financier for a lot of this. And I do think that was interesting too, about energy being unique and they might have something special, something promising, but the timing is just not right, and so it's like the late nineties like that was. You know, there was a lot of excitement about clean energy in the late nineties two, but oil and gas were really cheap. Sometimes wonder if the d OE should be taking equity stakes in some of these companies. Yeah, I mean Tesla, they gave that loan in they take an equity in Tesla, we'd have a lot more money energy, that's true, if it were it were set up so that they could recycle those profits. Yeah. Anyway, it'd be good to get Chigger on once a year in September, see how that's going, and then we could do a walk through of all the loans he's approved. Yeah, and the exciting new projects that you're seeing. Hopefully, all right, shall we leave it there. Let's leave it there. This has been another episode of the All Thoughts Podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on Twitter at Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe wi Isn't All. You can follow me on Twitter at The Stalwart. Follow our guest on Twitter Jigger Shaw. He's at Jigger Shaw d C. Follow our producer, Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen Arman, and check out all of our podcasts at Bloomberg under the handle at podcasts. Thanks for listening year

In 1 playlist(s)

  1. Odd Lots

    928 clip(s)

Odd Lots

On Bloomberg’s Odd Lots podcast Joe Weisenthal and Tracy Alloway explore the most interesting topics 
Social links
Follow podcast
Recent clips
Browse 928 clip(s)