For many believers around the world, baptism is far more than a religious ceremony. It is seen as a sacred crossing point — a moment of cleansing, surrender and spiritual rebirth. Across generations, rivers, streams, dams and open waters have become places where people gather to publicly affirm their faith and begin what they believe is a new journey with God. These ceremonies often bring together entire families and communities to witness deeply personal moments of transformation and hope. But while these waters carry profound spiritual meaning, they have also become associated with a growing number of tragedies that leave families shattered and communities searching for answers. Over the years, South Africa and several other countries have seen repeated incidents where worshippers have drowned or lost their lives during baptism ceremonies. In some cases, dangerous currents, rising water levels and flash floods have turned moments of celebration into scenes of devastation. In others, questions have emerged around planning, safety measures and
whether enough awareness exists about the risks associated with natural water environments. Tonight, we broaden the conversation beyond a single tragedy and ask difficult questions around faith,
responsibility and prevention. Can these sacred practices continue in the way they always have? Should there be stronger safety measures in place? And perhaps most importantly, can faith and safety coexist without one undermining the other?

For many believers around the world, baptism is far more than a&nbsp;religious ceremony. It is seen as a sacred crossing point &mdash; a&nbsp;moment of cleansing, surrender and spiritual rebirth. Across&nbsp;generations, rivers, streams, dams and open waters have become&nbsp;places where people gather to publicly affirm their faith and begin&nbsp;what they believe is a new journey with God. These ceremonies&nbsp;often bring together entire families and communities to witness&nbsp;deeply personal moments of transformation and hope. But while&nbsp;these waters carry profound spiritual meaning, they have also&nbsp;become associated with a growing number of tragedies that leave&nbsp;families shattered and communities searching for answers. Over the years, South Africa and several other countries have&nbsp;seen repeated incidents where worshippers have drowned or lost&nbsp;their lives during baptism ceremonies. In some cases, dangerous&nbsp;currents, rising water levels and flash floods have turned&nbsp;moments of celebration into scenes of devastation. In others,&nbsp;questions have emerged around planning, safety measures and whether enough awareness exists about the risks associated with&nbsp;natural water environments. Tonight, we broaden the conversation&nbsp;beyond a single tragedy and ask difficult questions around faith, responsibility and prevention. Can these sacred practices&nbsp;continue in the way they always have? Should there be stronger&nbsp;safety measures in place? And perhaps most importantly, can&nbsp;faith and safety coexist without one undermining the other?

AFTER 8 IS AFTER 8: Sacred Waters, Silent Tragedies

For decades after the end of apartheid, South Africa’s cities have continued to carry the scars of spatial inequality — where where you live often determines the opportunities you can access, the
schools your children attend, and even the cost and time of getting to work. Now, in what has become one of the country’s most significant housing rights battles, the Constitutional Court has delivered a landmark judgment on the controversial sale of the former Tafelberg school site in Sea Point. The court has ruled that the sale was unlawful, finding that both the Western Cape government and the City of Cape Town failed to adequately consider affordable housing in well-located areas. Although the
property sale itself was cancelled years ago, the broader questions remain: who gets to live in South Africa’s cities, and who continues to be pushed further away from economic opportunities? Tonight, we unpack the significance of this ruling, its impact on future housing policy, and whether this could reshape the ongoing struggle against apartheid-era spatial planning.

For decades after the end of apartheid, South Africa&rsquo;s cities have&nbsp;continued to carry the scars of spatial inequality &mdash; where where&nbsp;you live often determines the opportunities you can access, the schools your children attend, and even the cost and time of&nbsp;getting to work. Now, in what has become one of the country&rsquo;s&nbsp;most significant housing rights battles, the Constitutional Court&nbsp;has delivered a landmark judgment on the controversial sale of&nbsp;the former Tafelberg school site in Sea Point. The court has ruled&nbsp;that the sale was unlawful, finding that both the Western Cape&nbsp;government and the City of Cape Town failed to adequately&nbsp;consider affordable housing in well-located areas. Although the property sale itself was cancelled years ago, the broader&nbsp;questions remain: who gets to live in South Africa&rsquo;s cities, and&nbsp;who continues to be pushed further away from economic&nbsp;opportunities? Tonight, we unpack the significance of this ruling,&nbsp;its impact on future housing policy, and whether this could reshape the ongoing struggle against apartheid-era spatial&nbsp;planning.

Tafelberg Judgment: A Turning Point for Housing Justice in Cape Town

Questions around political influence, lobbying and access to power are once again taking centre stage following allegations involving government ministers, a prominent public affairs firm and one of the world's most talked-about technology companies. Parliament's Portfolio Committee on Communications and Digital Technologies chairperson, Khusela Sangoni-Diko, is now
demanding answers from communications minister Solly Malatsi over claims that representatives linked to Starlink sought access to government through politically connected channels. The
controversy emerged after former DA leader John Steenhuisen alleged that a public affairs firm linked to former DA leader Tony Leon attempted to facilitate meetings between ministers and private clients, including Starlink representatives. While the claims have been strongly denied, the allegations have reignited concerns around transparency, accountability and whether private interests may be exerting influence over public decision-making. Tonight, we unpack the allegations, the denials and whether this represents routine lobbying or raises deeper questions about how business gains access to political power.

Questions around political influence, lobbying and access to&nbsp;power are once again taking centre stage following allegations&nbsp;involving government ministers, a prominent public affairs firm&nbsp;and one of the world's most talked-about technology companies.&nbsp;Parliament's Portfolio Committee on Communications and Digital&nbsp;Technologies chairperson, Khusela Sangoni-Diko, is now demanding answers from communications minister Solly Malatsi&nbsp;over claims that representatives linked to Starlink sought access&nbsp;to government through politically connected channels. The controversy emerged after former DA leader John Steenhuisen&nbsp;alleged that a public affairs firm linked to former DA leader Tony&nbsp;Leon attempted to facilitate meetings between ministers and&nbsp;private clients, including Starlink representatives. While the claims&nbsp;have been strongly denied, the allegations have reignited&nbsp;concerns around transparency, accountability and whether private&nbsp;interests may be exerting influence over public decision-making.&nbsp;Tonight, we unpack the allegations, the denials and whether this&nbsp;represents routine lobbying or raises deeper questions about how&nbsp;business gains access to political power.

Starlink, Lobbying and Questions of Influence: Is South Africa  Facing Another Transparency Test?

Every parent hopes to leave something meaningful behind for their children, whether it’s a home, savings, investments or simply financial security. But what happens if someone passes away with outstanding debt? How does that affect the estate and the inheritance their loved ones were expecting? And perhaps more importantly, how can you start planning now to make sure
you’re leaving behind a legacy rather than financial complications? From managing debt to building wealth and planning your estate properly, what does it take to get it right? Today we’re joined by a financial planner and a debt expert to help us understand how to protect your loved ones and leave
behind the best possible financial legacy.

Every parent hopes to leave something meaningful behind for their children,&nbsp;whether it&rsquo;s a home, savings, investments or&nbsp;simply financial security. But what happens if someone passes&nbsp;away with outstanding debt? How does that affect the estate and&nbsp;the inheritance their loved ones were expecting? And perhaps&nbsp;more importantly, how can you start planning now to make sure you&rsquo;re leaving behind a legacy rather than financial&nbsp;complications? From managing debt to building wealth and&nbsp;planning your estate properly, what does it take to get it right?&nbsp;Today we&rsquo;re joined by a financial planner and a debt expert to&nbsp;help us understand how to protect your loved ones and leave behind the best possible financial legacy.

AFTER 8 IS AFTER 8: The Financial Legacy You Leave Behind Will Your Children Inherit Wealth or Financial Problems?

President Cyril Ramaphosa has announced a Cabinet reshuffle,
making several changes requested by the Democratic Alliance
(DA) as part of the Government of National Unity.
Key appointments include:
● Willem Aucamp as Minister of Agriculture.
● David Maynier as Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the
Environment.
● John Steenhuisen as Deputy Minister of Trade, Industry and
Competition.
● Alexandra Abrahams as Deputy Minister of Electricity and
Energy.
● Jack Bloom as Deputy Minister of Water and Sanitation.
● Yusuf Cassim as Deputy Minister of Higher Education.
Ramaphosa also appointed Dina Pule as Minister of Social
Development, filling the vacancy left after Sisisi Tolashe was
dismissed in May.
Pule&#39;s appointment is controversial because she was dismissed as
Communications Minister in 2013 after investigations found she
had acted unethically. Former Public Protector Thuli Madonsela
found that Pule had lied to Parliament and violated the Executive
Members&#39; Ethics Code over her relationship with a businessman
who benefited from his association with her. She was
reprimanded, suspended by Parliament, and removed from
Cabinet by former President Jacob Zuma.
After returning to Parliament as an ANC MP following the 2024
elections, Pule has now been reinstated to Cabinet. Ramaphosa
wished all the new ministers and deputy ministers well in their new
roles. We break down his decision.

President Cyril Ramaphosa has announced a Cabinet reshuffle, making several changes requested by the Democratic Alliance (DA) as part of the Government of National Unity. Key appointments include: ● Willem Aucamp as Minister of Agriculture. ● David Maynier as Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment. ● John Steenhuisen as Deputy Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition. ● Alexandra Abrahams as Deputy Minister of Electricity and Energy. ● Jack Bloom as Deputy Minister of Water and Sanitation. ● Yusuf Cassim as Deputy Minister of Higher Education. Ramaphosa also appointed Dina Pule as Minister of Social Development, filling the vacancy left after Sisisi Tolashe was dismissed in May. Pule&amp;#39;s appointment is controversial because she was dismissed as Communications Minister in 2013 after investigations found she had acted unethically. Former Public Protector Thuli Madonsela found that Pule had lied to Parliament and violated the Executive Members&amp;#39; Ethics Code over her relationship with a businessman who benefited from his association with her. She was reprimanded, suspended by Parliament, and removed from Cabinet by former President Jacob Zuma. After returning to Parliament as an ANC MP following the 2024 elections, Pule has now been reinstated to Cabinet. Ramaphosa wished all the new ministers and deputy ministers well in their new roles. We break down his decision.

Ramaphosa Announces Cabinet Reshuffle

City Power consumers will have to dig deep in their pockets as
sharp price hikes kick in.It follows NERSA&#39;s approval of an 8.76
percent annual tariff increase for Eskom for 2026/27.But the
power utility says it&#39;s adjusting its tariffs for the year to 8.63
percent lower than NERSA and Eskom to help cushion
customers against rising electricity costs.NERSA has approved
176 municipal and local authority tariff hike applications for the
2026/27 financial year. What does this mean for South Africa’s
economy and energy system?

City Power consumers will have to dig deep in their pockets as sharp price hikes kick in.It follows NERSA&amp;#39;s approval of an 8.76 percent annual tariff increase for Eskom for 2026/27.But the power utility says it&amp;#39;s adjusting its tariffs for the year to 8.63 percent lower than NERSA and Eskom to help cushion customers against rising electricity costs.NERSA has approved 176 municipal and local authority tariff hike applications for the 2026/27 financial year. What does this mean for South Africa&rsquo;s economy and energy system?

City Power consumers face 8.63% electricity hike as new tariffs kick in 

The Pretoria Specialised Commercial Crimes Court rejected a
plea agreement that would have allowed businessman Vusimuzi
&quot;Cat&quot; Matlala to serve an effective eight-year prison sentence for
fraud, corruption and money laundering linked to a R228 million
SAPS tender.Magistrate Ignatius du Preez ruled that the
proposed sentence was too lenient and did not adequately
reflect the seriousness of Matlala&#39;s crimes. While acknowledging
Matlala&#39;s cooperation with investigators, the court found that it
did not demonstrate genuine remorse and should not justify a
reduced sentence. The magistrate also stressed that
investigating and prosecuting corruption is the responsibility of
the SAPS and the NPA, not the accused.Instead, Du Preez
suggested a sentence that would result in an effective 12 years&#39;
imprisonment, including: -15 years for fraud, with seven years
suspended under strict conditions. -10 years each for corruption
and money laundering, with most of those sentences running
concurrently.The matter has been postponed to 13 July to allow
the State and Matlala to negotiate a revised plea agreement
based on the court&#39;s guidance. We understand this better with a
legal expert.

The Pretoria Specialised Commercial Crimes Court rejected a plea agreement that would have allowed businessman Vusimuzi &amp;quot;Cat&amp;quot; Matlala to serve an effective eight-year prison sentence for fraud, corruption and money laundering linked to a R228 million SAPS tender.Magistrate Ignatius du Preez ruled that the proposed sentence was too lenient and did not adequately reflect the seriousness of Matlala&amp;#39;s crimes. While acknowledging Matlala&amp;#39;s cooperation with investigators, the court found that it did not demonstrate genuine remorse and should not justify a reduced sentence. The magistrate also stressed that investigating and prosecuting corruption is the responsibility of the SAPS and the NPA, not the accused.Instead, Du Preez suggested a sentence that would result in an effective 12 years&amp;#39; imprisonment, including: -15 years for fraud, with seven years suspended under strict conditions. -10 years each for corruption and money laundering, with most of those sentences running concurrently.The matter has been postponed to 13 July to allow the State and Matlala to negotiate a revised plea agreement based on the court&amp;#39;s guidance. We understand this better with a legal expert.

Court Rejects Proposed Sentence in Cat Matlala Plea Deal

Twenty years after South Africa became one of the first countries
in the world to legalise same-sex marriage, a new study suggests
the country may be changing in ways many did not expect. While
public attitudes toward LGBTI people appear to be becoming more
accepting, the picture is far more complex than a simple story of
progress. The latest research from the Other Foundation and the
Human Sciences Research Council shows that more South
Africans now support equal rights and say their own views have
shifted over time. Yet questions around family acceptance,
religion, culture and everyday inclusion remain deeply contested.
So what has changed over the last decade, what is driving these
shifts, and are constitutional protections translating into real
experiences for people on the ground? Tonight, we unpack the
numbers and the stories behind them with voices from the Other
Foundation and organisations working directly within these
communities.

Twenty years after South Africa became one of the first countries in the world to legalise same-sex marriage, a new study suggests the country may be changing in ways many did not expect. While public attitudes toward LGBTI people appear to be becoming more accepting, the picture is far more complex than a simple story of progress. The latest research from the Other Foundation and the Human Sciences Research Council shows that more South Africans now support equal rights and say their own views have shifted over time. Yet questions around family acceptance, religion, culture and everyday inclusion remain deeply contested. So what has changed over the last decade, what is driving these shifts, and are constitutional protections translating into real experiences for people on the ground? Tonight, we unpack the numbers and the stories behind them with voices from the Other Foundation and organisations working directly within these communities.

AFTER 8 IS AFTER 8: Is South Africa truly more accepting of the LGBTIQ community, or just more polite about it?

As South Africa reaches the end of a highly charged and tense
day, questions are now emerging not only about immigration, but
about the state of the country itself. Today, thousands of people
across various parts of South Africa took to the streets as
anti-illegal immigration groups coordinated nationwide
demonstrations, calling for stricter immigration enforcement and
the deportation of undocumented migrants. While organisers
insisted the protests were aimed at government policy and border
control, in several areas the day took on a far more volatile
character, with reports of homes being entered, foreign nationals
being targeted, sporadic violence breaking out and police being
forced to intervene.
In places such as Germiston and Alexandra, tensions escalated as
community members moved through neighbourhoods searching
for foreign nationals, while in Cape Town authorities moved swiftly
to contain opportunistic criminal activity. Police had warned
beforehand that they would have a strong presence on the ground
and that any criminality or vigilantism would not be tolerated.
Tonight we speak to activists, organisers and ordinary South
Africans from different corners of the country to understand what
unfolded, what people were demanding and whether today's
events signal a deeper frustration over unemployment, crime and
governance, or something far more dangerous developing
beneath the surface.

As South Africa reaches the end of a highly charged and tense day, questions are now emerging not only about immigration, but about the state of the country itself. Today, thousands of people across various parts of South Africa took to the streets as anti-illegal immigration groups coordinated nationwide demonstrations, calling for stricter immigration enforcement and the deportation of undocumented migrants. While organisers insisted the protests were aimed at government policy and border control, in several areas the day took on a far more volatile character, with reports of homes being entered, foreign nationals being targeted, sporadic violence breaking out and police being forced to intervene. In places such as Germiston and Alexandra, tensions escalated as community members moved through neighbourhoods searching for foreign nationals, while in Cape Town authorities moved swiftly to contain opportunistic criminal activity. Police had warned beforehand that they would have a strong presence on the ground and that any criminality or vigilantism would not be tolerated. Tonight we speak to activists, organisers and ordinary South Africans from different corners of the country to understand what unfolded, what people were demanding and whether today's events signal a deeper frustration over unemployment, crime and governance, or something far more dangerous developing beneath the surface.

Anti-immigration protests - Voices from the streets

Former DA leader and outgoing Agriculture Minister John Steenhuisen has levelled explosive allegations against his own party, accusing Resolve Communications — a public relations firm
chaired by former DA leader Tony Leon — of driving a sustained campaign against both him and his chief of staff. Steenhuisen claims powerful figures within the party worked to shape public
narratives against him amid mounting pressure over his future and internal tensions within the Democratic Alliance. The claims have reignited questions around power dynamics within the DA and whether political figures have previously found themselves isolated or pushed out through similar circumstances. We’ll be unpacking these allegations with former DA member and ActionSA leader Herman Mashaba, who has previously spoken about his own experiences within the party. Speculation and allegations have also surfaced around whether similar tactics may have played a role during his departure from the DA, and we’ll be getting his perspective on the claims now emerging from Steenhuisen.

Former DA leader and outgoing Agriculture Minister John&nbsp;Steenhuisen has levelled explosive allegations against his own&nbsp;party, accusing Resolve Communications &mdash; a public relations firm chaired by former DA leader Tony Leon &mdash; of driving a sustained&nbsp;campaign against both him and his chief of staff. Steenhuisen&nbsp;claims powerful figures within the party worked to shape public narratives against him amid mounting pressure over his future&nbsp;and internal tensions within the Democratic Alliance.&nbsp;The claims have reignited questions around power dynamics&nbsp;within the DA and whether political figures have previously found&nbsp;themselves isolated or pushed out through similar circumstances.&nbsp;We&rsquo;ll be unpacking these allegations with former DA member and&nbsp;ActionSA leader Herman Mashaba, who has previously spoken&nbsp;about his own experiences within the party. Speculation and&nbsp;allegations have also surfaced around whether similar tactics may&nbsp;have played a role during his departure from the DA, and we&rsquo;ll be&nbsp;getting his perspective on the claims now emerging from&nbsp;Steenhuisen.

From Steenhuisen to Mashaba: Questions Around Internal DA Battles ( ACTION SA LEADER HERMAN MASHABA )

METRO FM Talk with Faith Mangope

METRO FM Talk with Faith Mangope

Social links:

1,961 clip(s)