Liv speaks with Dr Joe Watson about the trans characters of Ovid's Metamorphoses, Iphis and Caeneus, along with some necessary asides into Atalanta, Arachne, and Medusa. Follow Joe on Twitter. Help keep LTAMB going by subscribing to Liv's Patreon for bonus content!
CW/TW: far too many Greek myths involve assault. Given it's fiction, and typically involves gods and/or monsters, I'm not as deferential as I would be were I referencing the real thing.
Attributions and licensing information for music used in the podcast can be found here: mythsbaby.com/sources-attributions.
Hi, Hello, Welcome. This is Let's talk about mits Baby and I am your host, live here with a conversation episode. Oh I'm so excited about this one. I just recently listened back to it to do this editing, and I just I love when listening back is like just as much fun as when I recorded it, and that is so the case for this one. So I spoke with doctor Joe Watson, who I learned about from himself when he reached out to me last year. I was covering the stories of Iphae and i Anthe and of Canus slash Caneus. These are the two trans characters that are featured in of its metamorphoses, and he shared an article that he'd written about exactly this. It was so wonderful and a conversation was like too. It was too late in the month to have a conversation for last year, so we kind of put it on the books for this year, and I'm so glad it worked out. We talked about if this as a trans character or how they can be read as you know, a kind of of lesbian story that that kind of gets its means of being like a real love story in ancient Greece, you know, all of these different ways that we can read these characters and and generally how we can understand them to be all these different forms of evidence of you know, gender diversity and sexual orientation diversity in the ancient world. So we talked about the real intricacies of what makes IFAs very different from Caneus, even as they are both trans characters, absolutely fascinating. There's a bunch of asides into other amazing characters from of its metamorphoses, because that is what Joe specializes in. And so we talked a little bit about Atalanta and a little bit about Medusa and a Rakney too, and just generally such a fun and informative and insightful conversation and just perfect for Pride Month. I am recording this introduction weeks in advance, so I'm trying to put myself in when it'll actually be June, which it is not currently, But in any case, it's absolutely perfect for Pride Month for once more featuring stories of LGBTQIA characters in the ancient world, which I really love doing every year, even if it is getting more and more difficult to find ways of telling stories because I've exhausted all of them, but thankfully we have conversation episodes for that. And so this is just one of three new conversations that I've got coming this month. Now that I think about it, I don't know if this one's coming first, because I'm just it's just the first one I'm recording. We'll see. I'm gonna stop trying to over explain something and just let you get to the episode conversations putting the trans in transformations if this and Kneus with doctor Joe Watson. So, I mean, you'll have to forgive me because we originally talked about this like a full year ago. But I'm just like, I guess, I'm just I'm fascinated by anything that you have to say in this realm. But like, basically you've studied You've studied the two notable trans characters in the Metamorphoses, right, so it would be like if it's of if it's an Ianthe and then can or Caneus. Yeah, so yeah, what what in what way of if you study these characters? Like what what have you?
Yeah?
What work have you done on them?
Sure? So I guess this, like all originally came out of when I was doing my PhD, and I was interested in how it's like there's this group of We're going to complicate this term in a second, but let's start off with this group of female characters in the nest Porphoses who all sort of behave in the same way, and you'll be familiar when you're reading through of them. It's the ones, like the women who do these long speeches, so it's your atalanta, this mirror, and they all kind of have the same dynamics. So I was interesting comparing those to each other. And then I had like I fist in the middle of this, and I was like, but woman doesn't feel right to rescrive I fis alongside all these other ones who were just unambiguously definitely women, And so that was so basically it started off as I need to fit in a footnote in this dissertation to explain why I Fis isn't a woman, but for the sake of argument, I'm going to talk about this group of people and life is going to be in that group of people. And then from there it kind of turned into okay, all right, this, I guess, all right this, and then eventually we had a ten thousand word paper on our hands, and I was like, to send this off and publish this somewhere, and I kind of had a lot of, I guess, weird feelings about this as a non trans person but a queer person. I was like, so I was going to go and should I this? Should I not publish? This? Is this my story to tell? And then I thought, well, I know a lot about OVID. I may not myself be trans, but I know a huge amount of about of it. I love the met maybe I can try and tell this story. So I guess that's where it came from originally, and then it just came across I guess. The next step was I got really annoyed at reading other people's writing about Iphisiqui, and so I started going through all these articles and you see, the most weird outdated language from classis in like two thousand and six. I'm not talking about like nineteen sixty here or anything. Yeah, just stuff that I'm like, that's not even a slur. That just doesn't make sense. O God. So like, I don't know who it is now. There's someone also name Chane wan Shaw.
But there's sometimes they deserve it.
But I who talks about like people being bisexual, and they don't mean like attracted to more than one gender. They just be like with duplex sexual anatomy, so like in some way maybe intersex. And I'm just like, that's not even a helpful description, Like, no one reading that would know what you mean.
No, that literally means something else, like to everyone who reads the word.
And let's be honest, who's going to be reading the words about Iphis and the Anthey like, there's going to be a fair number of bisexuals in that audience, going, well, that's what exactly. So it was rage basically then propelled me on from there. Fair Yeah, And I in seeing all these weird things that other people had said, I realized there were so many things that seemed abundantly obvious, not just to me, but to so many people that I knew and I could see on the Internet. I was never like a tumbler girly myself, but I was very aware of Iphis and Kinaeus as being like characters in that kind of realm of the Internet.
I bet they would be. Yeah. I was also never on tumblor really, but I can see that so real.
So I thought, this is not my hot take. This is very much like it's in the atmosphere. So I thought, if I just say some really obvious things, at least then someone said them and they're in a publication record somewhere as having been said, so someone else can go the argument has been made that is actually transcaracteron Yeah, right, that could be done. That'd be wonderful. So I guess it's where it started.
Yeah, no, I really I really like that and identify with it because, like I, I mean, I still remember, like years and years ago on the show originally reading that myth, and I know the first time I read through it and the first time I featured it on the show, I kind of I definitely I remember coming out at the end and being like, I think you can see this character in two different ways, depending on how you personally want to see them, Like, I think that if this can be read as a lesbian who was gifted some way of being with the person that they love in a society where they couldn't, you know, or as this trans character. And and the trans character works so well too, I mean purely because like there is not it's not just one trans character in the met and that is so so interesting and so yeah, like I like, I mean, one, just the fact that the met has these characters is so important today and also just like generally interesting. So I'm glad to know that people are writing about it. Like I don't. I don't have the same access to like the academic side. So I'm thrilled because you sent me your paper and that was so helpful, and I just like, oh, this is great because like I don't, I'm not in that world. I don't even know where to go, Like I mean, I know where to go looking, but oh my god, trying to read through Jstore as a person who's not in that realm anymore, like nah, sometimes I just get lost every time. But yeah, so I was thrilled to have that. But it is so it's such an interesting kind of concept to go through. I mean, I can't get over the bisexual thing though, And also like two thousand and six, like I wish that surprised me, but like I graduated high school one thousand and six, it was not that long ago, even though okay, fine it was, but like like yeah, it's just it's so wild the way that things have changed like so much, and also like not at all, but you know that's that's interesting.
Yeah, I might in another world that we fully don't need to go into. I do a lot of like late nineteenth century early twentieth century stuff, and describing someone who do now go intersects as bisexuals just read to me like this came out eighteen ninety seven, this and that's what this feels like. Yeah, this was made to two thousands.
Like I mean, I would expect, just I would horribly expect a lot of transphobia in that time because like you know, I grew up with friends the show to be clear, but like you know, it's but yeah, but to see that that's just like nonsensical, Like did no. I'm just like I want to understand, Like did it I mean no, no, I don't because I was gonna be like, well because I guess if it's with like boys and girls, presumably, but like there is actually no acknowledgment that they would.
Yeah there's I mean, it's just it's I am.
The way and like yeah, like yeah, yeah.
One person direction. Yeah, No, I think I did look into it at the time. Is this is a thing. It's just not a thing that more people would say they want to be understood exactly.
Yeah, because I mean, like the word, the origins of the word itself makes it makes sense, but like the word itself does not mean that. So here we are. Yeah.
So yeah, and then I think I think one of the things because I didn't feel when I was writing this article like I was reinventing in the wheel. I felt a bit like I'm saying things that people have been saying for years, but I'm saying them in a recorded way. Yeah, and some of the things I'm just saying. But this is so there's so much interesting obvious stuff, like even if Ofvid doesn't know what a trans person is, and sure maybe off it doesn't, he goes out of his way to say, if this is a name you can give to anyone of any gender, you go, he doesn't have to do that, and yeah, sure it works in the nice clever bit of the myth where you go, yeah, sure, yeah, the character who's potentially going to change gender. But also he doesn't have to go out of his way to allow that reading quite as well as he does. And he does allow that reading because I really liked what you said about you can sort of read this as anything depending on who you are what you want to come at it from. And a few couple of years ago before I ended up publishing this, I did this workshop at the university I was at the time with undergraduate students where we looked at the story and we looked at a reception of this story and kind of modern literature and like, but what what is this? Like what label do we want to attach? And the number of different labels. I got back from the audience saying, well, it was obviously this is what it's obvious this is and you go, well, none of you are the same thing, so it's clearly not that obvious. And that's a really nice thing about that story. And I think I think that's somewhere where my understanding like changed over time. Is I started off with this kind of rage, like I need to make the political statement that ifuis is a transman, because no one else in the scholarship at least is making this political statement, and so it's really important, and then kind of going, yeah, it is. It's also quite important for lesbians as well, because it's not like there's a great number of lesbians out in classical literature for people to look at, and this is a nice happy story. So I think that was it took some time, I think to maybe calm down from my rage to host people complete this and that's that's well.
And I mean I think, yeah, both are valid too though, right, like obviously, especially now, you know, transrepresentation is incredibly important, especially like laying out the history of how long these people have existed and the acknowledgment in stuff like the met of like hey, like, yeah, maybe Avid didn't you know how to conceptualize the concept of a transperson, but like at the same time, he very much did in his own, very specific way. And I mean there's there's so much example. There's lots of examples beyond a of it too in the ancient world, which is just it's so nice and so yeah, like I also love to to, yeah, make that very clear, you know, in my show. But at the same time, yeah, I mean, there really is not a lot of happy ending like same sex relationships at all, Like, let alone women, there's almost no like you know, acknowledgment of women loving other women. But even when there are men, they tend to die. So you know, it's like it's nice to have this as as possibly both as like yeah, this kind of thing where if you feel that is representative of you, that great. It's either one you know, like and I think that's yeah, a nice, a nice way of seeing it. There's like, there's lots of myths like that, but this is one that's particularly interesting. And so like I read your paperback when I did the episode, and then I admittedly didn't read it again. I mean, you know, I get that I don't. I don't tend to listen back to anything that I do unless I absolutely have to. But so, like, what what was it that you were were kind of laying out in terms of this as like the you know, the evidence aside from well, I mean, I mean feel try to reiterate all the story.
Yeah that's fair. So I guess the thing that struck me first about is I looked at story and you know, this is this lovely story where you get this person born who the author tells us of It tells us is born a woman quote unquote, but then in the immediately told by her what her father says to her mother, you can't actually raise a daughter because there's no money, and so this child from day one is raised as a boy and you don't really know much about how I Fis understands himself sort of do we get speech later on, but we get this this child who's raised the boy and then later in life falls in love with a young girl doesn't really understand how that's gonna work because there's no fun little sexual paradigm telling ife is how to love a woman and then kind of, through their mother's help, transforms quote unquote transforms because exactly what that transformation is is not entirely clear, but transforms into a man. I think one of the things that struck me when I was thinking about how am I gonna make this argument was actually that transformation is weirdly understated, because what you get is something like Iphis's step got longer, his face grew and got more vigor in it, and he became stronger, and it was it's really like general stuff. It's not very explicit, and so, you know, being a kind of a myth that I thought, well, it's going to have a look, what do the other versions of this story say, like Ovid can't be the first? What other versions of the story saying, it's like a similar story that clearly of it is basing the Anthey story on. Is there really yeah, from I think I'm going to say Antoninus liberalists, although I might be wrong.
I was gonna say, how did I miss this? But if it was, if it was liberals, I you can see why I would it.
People would miss that if I got that right, maybe whether I have sorry it's Nicanada. I'm so sorry it's Canada.
Now another that I don't even know.
We have like a summary of it later. So it's one of those ones.
Yeah, and by that I mean I hate them.
I hate them so much. And I think it's Antoni's liberals who references, So that's.
All good, right, Yeah, one of those another guy.
Yeah, but it really explicitly says in Greek source that it's there as the goddess Alito. I think isis, which is it grew genitalia on a girl through male genitalia on a girl. So it's like super explicit. Yeah, and then OVID doesn't do anything like that, and that really interested me, like why does OVID who has absolutely no qualms whatsoever about making a story sexual if it doesn't have to be?
Well it was also yeah, I also ordermind the listeners to just how much because that is so interesting because not only that but also like, the whole point of including this character in this book is to have a transformation, and typically the transformation is fairly detailed because that's the entire purpose of the metamorphosy. So yeah, to have it be so inexplicit is really interesting.
Really odd, and it's you know, without getting into the whole like what's going on in the literature sort of thing. There's something really weird going on in book nine of its metamorphoses anyway, because all of the transformations are a bit odd. There. You know, the story immediately before. It's the story of Biblis, who's an woman who's in love with her brother and she writes lovely it's so weird she writes these love letters and then she doesn't really like transform. Like at the end of the story she turns into a fountain, but it's described it about four lines, and you go, you didn't need a two hundred and fifty line story to tell me that she transformed into a fountain in four lines. So what we're doing metamorphosis and transformation at this point. Yeah, and then we have a story it's all about change, but the change itself seems really understated. Yeah, which is odd, decidedly weird. So yeah, So I started from saying, this is a transformation that's like understated, and then I looked at the name of the that's a common name, and I thought, well, is it like if we actually look at how this name is used in historical records and the like inscriptions and things like that, is it mostly used of men or most use of women? And the answer is basically, it genuinely is like a common name like it really is, which is interesting, like you know of a picked a name that really.
Was Yeah, and it's Greek too, right, because so we think that he probably invented this name though or we we you know, have evidence of it before.
Yeah, we generally think genuine having invented the name, he invents attaching it to this myth.
So that is yeah, that's what I But I mean, he picked a very Greek name.
Yeah, it's a Greek name and a name that is historically really associated with men, because there's an i Fist in the Argonautica and Jason the Argonauts. So you've already got if you're reading it and you don't know anything about the story, your association is that's a man's name, even though you probably know women called that name. Yeah, I guess, like as a person called Joe. I relate there are women, but mostly it's a man's name.
As someone who was originally named Alex. I also, yeah, I hear that.
Yeah, so yeah. I looked at that, and then I thought, because I got I got confused. Basically, so Latin and Greek awful languages, and they have cases, so they have multiple forms that appearing.
That's why I gave up on Latin very quickly.
Totally fair, and I thought, well, I don't know, how does this name work with the Greek name that's been talked about in Latin in the Latin poem, like, what where is it getting its endings from? Are they look a bit Latin? To me? I was looking with these look like Latin endings, it's a been a Greek ending in there. So I started looking into the endings of the Greek name and how that works. And it turns out that in Greek you have like a masculine ipis that looks like iphis sometimes but then has different forms, and a feminine i fist that looks like iphism form, So they only really look alike in the in the form where their iphis otherwise they look different. Yeah, but ovidently has one form of the name, so he's kind of mixed together to some extent, probably the masculine the feminine Greek ending, so you get this kind of already you're associating with a man, but it's got these blended endings, and it has some feminine endings in it too, So on a grammatical level, it really interested me. This was a like blended name that we don't have great evidence for the name in Latin before it, So we don't it's really hard to make a case to how how much blending of it's done and how much that's just what's happened over time to the name, but certainly of it's done something to deliberately combine some forces here, which is really odd thought.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, so I guess because in Latin, and this is me not ever having read of it in Latin and again having done first year Latin and then been like no, like because in the actual poem itself, wouldn't it. So it only appears as if it's it doesn't.
Ever have sure. So yeah, so it does appear in other forms, but a lot of the time it's not always explicitly clear, which whether it's takes. So I think the first time it comes up. This is at this point basing my memory on like not reason, this might be wrong, So I think it's if tata, So mutata is a feminine ending, so like with ife as having been transformed literally, so like that is feminine. Yeah, But then immediately afterwards you get that like it's her grandfather's name, so you go, well, then it's associated with a man. Then you get it in a very masculine form, so it's like it's undercut immediately we kind of have to do the feminine thing because this point in the story, Iphis is grammatically at least feminine, but then it immediately gets undercut. So there's this consistent like tension with the way of its presenting that name m And from there I got really interested in like, okay, because Latin's a gender language, everything is the masculine, feminine or mutabe what are the words as ovid use of life like, because every adjective would have to agree with the name, and then it would be a feminine masculator. And at this at the early point in the story, there are a couple of feminine adjectives totally true. There's also a lot of like deliberately avoiding the gender. So some parts, some forms in Latin don't display gender, some do, and it's like Ovid prefers to use the forms that don't display gender at that early point in the story, which I thought was really interesting. And you even get lots of references to iphis as like other things, just like metaphorically, so when life is in the womb, he's a weight, and a weight is a neuter gender in Latin condus, so like again it's deliberately not feminizing. You get kind of lots of things like this where I'm like, if Ovid wanted to exploit this, this kind of personal loves to exploit poetic forms and stuff, he would go out in this way to make these feminine forms, and he doesn't. Yeah, it seems to be deliberately underplayed to me.
Do you know how this compares to Canus and Taneous because I'm serious with that, Yeah, because like I know, like in the translations that one I can't remember as well with with if this, but that one tends Canus is pretty explicitly like Canus as Canus is a woman. And then Caneus is a man and it yeah, it feels like that really explicit, like so yeah, do you know, Yeah.
No, that is absolutely really explicit in it. And there are like two really interest things about that actually. So one is about the order in which we meet characters, like what do we meet them in because what we get told intil the storyline is we're at Troy having the Trojan War. It's really violet, really bloody, and there's this great soldier on the battle for called Calineus, and he is killing people left and right. Oh, nor I that could be confused. We have a battlefield and got Sickness the soldier, he's killing people left and right. And then yeah, one of the onan ones, one of those pines, and then we cut to a camp side Storytine when neir Stor is saying, actually, I once met a man who was just like Sickness, who also couldn't be destroyed back in the like pre mythic days before the Trojan War, and he was called Kineus, and no one could ever defeat him. He was so great, he was so powerful. And there's just like this story he was a woman. So it's it's framed as like meet the man who's caineus. Then there's this store worry of kindness, this rumor of kindness, and we get that cool, and we get this, you know, the story that I'm sure your listeners already familiar with, where this young for Salian woman kindness is walking along the beach and is assaulted by Neptune and it doesn't go great. But the first response she has is to go, you've done a horrible thing to me. I want you to make it so that I am no longer a woman? And what does that mean? Like, what does it mean not to be a woman? Does it mean to be a man? What does it mean not to suffer the things she just suffered? Yeah, Like Neptune makes a decision, and Neptune says, yeah, okay, what we're saying is that you want to be a man, And there's some evidence that maybe kindness then enjoys that, So potentially that was what he was asking for. But the question itself make all the statement itself make me not a woman is so ambiguous. Yeah, and again, people like scholars have gone in different directions on is this just saying patriarchy as ship, which it is? So I don't want to be a woman under the system or is this saying I actively want to be a man.
Yeah.
To me and my reading, the fact that the first thing that does after being transformed is go out and penetrate some the salient fields.
Yeah, I'm like that's what I read too. I was like, this is what tells me that I'm going to read this story as a nice thing that happened instead of a horror show, because it is. Yeah, I mean one that's a more enjoyable way of reading it. Neptune is bad enough without adding anymore. But then yeah, that I forgot about that until you said it was like, oh, I can hear myself like reading that to the listeners because it was so it was a lot.
Yeah, it's so like to me, that just feels like a deliberate, explicit thing.
Yeah.
But the other really interesting thing that's going with kines that I don't really talk about in the article because I might have missed this five years ago.
When I read the article on the I've got it now.
But you know, have the great opportunity when you're find teaching students now to be like, this is why scholarship can be rubbish, because sometimes your humble lecturer can fully forget or not put something in an article, but at least you get Tabok in the classroom now five years later. Is that of it doesn't invent the character, like Kineus has a literary history before he turns up in it, and most of that's pretty simple, right. So he turns up in Homer, he's one of the heroes, all good. He turns up in the Uger Nautica, where he's one of the heroes there, and he's you know, he's a great soldier. And that's where we first get the first idea that maybe his skin is unbreaking, which in the really plays with his skin is. But what he also turns up in Virgil. And that's the thing I think I completely forgot when the write this article is so briefly he turns up in Virgil. But when he turns up in Virgil, it's during the book six, if you're neared, where in As is going down into the underworld to find out about how great Rome is going to be right. And he goes down he's just about to go and see Dido again after fucking her over in book four, and he sees this crowd of women from mythology, and so he goes down he sees like Fhydra, Aeryphilly and pacifying and all these kind of women from Greek mythology, particularly Greek tragedy. And he also sees Kineus, who is called Kineus there again, this like masculine name, who I think Virgil says was once transformed into a man but has clearly or maybe reverted back to being a woman once in the underworld. Yeah, and it's quite ambiguous, like exactly what's going on there, you know, once a man, now a woman is what seems to be the the force there in the underworld. So that's whether Virgil invents that or not, we don't know. But there's already before of it this that will suggest that maybe we can play with the gender in this mythology a little bit.
Mm hmmm.
H m hm hm. And actually Kinas has already turned up in the Metamorphoses at least once as well, right in back in book eight. So this story makes it takes place to book twelve, ye book eight in the story of Atalanta and the Caledonian boar hunt, right, because.
He's another one of those, right.
He's another one, exactly another one.
In every hero story, Yeah.
Exactly, which I think is all part of it. Like if again, if thinking about what your reader who's never read the mesial Phosies is reading them, these these then Caineus, they go, I know that man that you know that is a powerful heroic superhero man from the Age of Heroes, from the Iliadrim, all these other books. So I think Virgil's already saying, but what if he was a woman, And then Ovid goes, what if I can exploit this even more and make this into the whole story if the whole story is not really about him being this heroic man, but it's actually about how he became the heroic man. Yeah, because in book eight when he turns up, yeah, he's there. And I'll give you the Latin because it's quite. It's quite. You can read it in a couple of ways. We get so it's a long category of all the heroes who are helping out Mellieger and Atalanta kill Caledonian Or and we get yam Non femina Caineus, so no longer a woman Caineus. But Ovid's not mentioned before, so clearly it's going. You remember in Virgil when he was a woman, but he is now a man and then was a woman again. Well, now he's no longer a woman. Yeah, and now four books later, I'm going to tell you the story of why he's no longer a woman. So it's yeah, he's playing around with that so much liberally.
Well, and I wonder if the Virgil is necessarily attempting to say that he was a woman again in the underworld or was if he was just included because he was once a woman. Yeah, because by saying Caneus and not well though, I guess we can't necessarily know if the name Canus was would have been known as the alternative. But yeah, that's interesting.
He definitely says that. Yeah, and it's it's a little bit ambiguous because so it's literally he goes as a companion also, who was once a man, once a young man, now a woman. Canaeus once again turned back into his old form by fate. But what was the old form? A man or a woman?
You know? Yeah, huh.
It's so deliberately playing around with it. So just being goes there's a myth I can exploit. And if I'm doing my poem all about transformation, here's a story where I can talk about transformation and look, maybe I'm not just transforming the gender of this character and also transforming the literary tradition. Do you see what I did there? You know? Loves?
Yeah, very that's so, that's so interesting. I how a thought happen and then my brain lost it. What I'm gonna lose it? And that's fine. No, I just that's really interesting. I'm I'm fascinated by just like how Avid plays with this stuff. And I mean, I just I guess I'm just like trying to wrap my head around just like all of it, I guess. But it is now the seeing this comparison between Caneus and if this is really interesting. Oh that was what you said something earlier that I I forgot that the whole thing about Kinnus is that is that his skin. Yeah is what did you you said? Unbreakable?
Yeah? Unbreakable, because I think that's what the from memory, I think that's what he's explicitly called in Apollonius of Rose up in Nauticus, of the kind of Hellenistic poem. He's unbreakable there.
Yeah, yeah, because all I can think about that is the alternative word being impenetrable.
Yeah, absolutely, yeah, And that's the other I think that was the you know, the thing that I realized in writing this article is that actually there is this paradigm, this system of masculinity at Rome that we associate particularly with the end of the Republic, so like the forties, fifties BC, going through to the early Empire, so the kind of twenties thirties BC going through early century, early decades, and see which.
Is exactly not writing, which is that masculinity is all about being impenetrable in so many different ways, like impenetrable socially because no one can come and mess with you, impenetrable physically because you shouldn't be stabbed by weapons, but also impenetrable sexually because actually there's this whole thing that particularly comes out in nineties scholarship that being a man at Rome is about being a penetrator. That's a penetrator of sexually. It's also a penetrator in like literary and philosophical ways. But m and that's kind of how you can define a man as opposed to any of the other gender groups who are floating around Rome, like enslaved people and women and children, they're all the opposite to a man in that sense.
Oh antiquity.
Yeah, it's a joy, isn't it. You know, it's one of those fun things my students as look at me like what are you talking about when I'm yeah, we're going to use the word genders at this point, and we're gonna have to talk about like women and children and in states people, it's a different gender to men, because if this is a gender construction and being a man as being a penetrator and they're not penetrated, then there are different gender to men, and like that's okay, actually yeah, not in the way they liked or signed up to. Yeah.
Really, My my biggest thing that I've just been saying into so many episodes lately is that I'm just obsessed with the idea that Athenian women were off having sex with each other all the time because men did not have any like, they didn't conceptualize sex as anything other than penetration. So they were just like, nah, the women are just hanging out. They're like lumen together all the time, you know, they don't care.
Yeah, yeah, no, absolutely, I love that.
Yeah, like just yeah, this idea that's like it's just like all about that, because of course, like even even in all of the you know, male relationships in Athens, it was still all about who was penetrating home.
Absolutely absolutely, like it all comes down to that, and see why that becomes such a fascinating the scholarion He was like, this is such a weird model. It's such a specific model, like and it doesn't get broken that often, like sometimes it gets broken, but not that often. So yeah, So if if Kineus is like already mythologically impenetrable, and Ovid wants to stress that, I'm making him into a man, and the way he gets to do that is by saying he's a man because he's impenetrable, and like those two kids get together, and so when he goes when so after Nestor's telling the story in the in the battles and Nestle telling the story about like Kineus is a soldier and it's the battle between the Centers the lapiss and Kinaus is now a young Lapis hero fighting the Centaurs. He goes, well, I'm gonna make it really explicitly that he is completely impenetrable and he can't be defeated by their swords read. They also can't fuck him, like he is totally indestructible because no one can enter him, and he's going to go and enter everywhere else in the battlefield. And suddenly you began to look at the descriptions of the battles that Kine does when he's fighting these centaurs, and it's like he stabbed them, he put a big thing in them. He made a wound on top of a wound on top of a wound, and you go, oh, no, this is this is not subtle of it, like at all. Yeah, this is really explicit.
Which Avid did love to Avid of.
Course, like would he be the same poet if he wasn't like constantly having sex scenes that actually looked like battle.
No, no, well, and I just yeah, the penetrating that the salient field was like.
Just it was like a preface to penetrating the like centaurs who were in those Salian fields later on.
Yeah, yeah, it's just like all of it. He just he liked to penetrate. That's all we know say about.
Good for him.
But but this transformation that does so explicitly make Kneus a penetrator, you know, when he becomes a man, but is so subtle with if this is such an interesting like comparison. Yeah, so, I mean, yeah, did like imagine you talked about that, but like, did you come to any conclusions about like what, yeah, what this means or what it could mean?
I guess, like I guess that this is one of those places where it's really nice to acknowledge that our modern world has given us a range of language that the ancients didn't necessarily have, and we can talk about like being at various spectrums on us, various places on a spectrum of gender that like, not every man has to be it has to be kind. It's like we can't. Some of us are going to fall short of that. But you can have these different things that are both definitely masculinities, that are both definitely ways of being a man, but doing that in slightly different ways, neither of them deviating too much from what it means to be a man at Rome, because to be a man has very specific rules, and as far as we can tell, they both meet those rules. And the even though of it is really explicit about as being a penetrator, he still needs room for us to think about iphis is are penetrated too, because the very last line of the iphist story, which is sort of the last line of book nine because it ends with this story, is a little votive offering that give to the goddess isis and they say thank you. The boy I fish potty tour his woman is the verb, and potto tour is this verb which means like to possess, but usually to possess or at least of it, very often to possess in a sexual way. So he does end with this moment of penetration, even though it's kind of not explicit, there is the last moment of penetration. So they're both men in different way, isn't That's okay?
Yeah, yeah, yeah, well, and that's that's basically what I would also think of just from this conversation. And I think that that again is such a powerful like acknowledgment in the ancient world, even of this kind of spectrum of the different forms and you know the ways that yeah, for all the way for all that IFAs cares, he's a man, like he gets what he wants, he gets to marry ayanthe like happily ever after, So like for all the ways that that matters to either of these people, they.
Are men because I guess, yeah, that's a really interesting thing with the IFAs story that I don't think I ever really thought about. So you know, he's been raised as a man for probably the first thirteen years. Was like this sort of specifies as thirteen what would it suddenly mean if he was uncovered and asked to live his life as a woman Like that would not be a natural state of affairs for everyone who wants to push back and say, well, this is because then you know, IFIs has this speech, and that's the we can't ignore the ipes has this long speech, which is why I started looking to in the first place. If you remember going back to like these people, right the speeches when he says I'm really uncomfortable with everything. Everything's making me unhappy, like what is this world? And he brings up all these mythological examples and says, well, like pacifying was pretty rubbish, but at least she got her man, Like, what what does it mean that I can't even do that? Like I'm so unnatural that I can't even get treated like pacified. That's a really disturbing thing to say about yourself, and people will point to this and say, well, this again, this is the patriarchy. This is a woman suffering under the patriarchy, and she's not able to express her her unhappiness in it in a kind of coherent way. So what she does is bringing these weird mythical examples in and I can't If someone wants to read it that way, it's totally fair. But to me that just feels like someone who has no idea how to be a woman, what it would mean to be a woman if the next day, you know, I just speak to anthy and Anty says, I don't want you. I want you to address as a woman. Now what would that like? That wouldn't work, And so there's definitely a lot of traua and discomfort in life is the speech there, But I don't necessarily equates to like I really want to be a woman either.
No, And it like it reminds me of the there's a reading of the Medusa story of Avid that goes around the internet all the time, this idea because it's not in of it, you know, it's this this idea that the sort of some kind of background of this is that you know, uh Athena didn't transform Adusa to punish her, but to save her from future assaults, and that this the argument you're talking about about this the issue being the patriarchy like reads to me like that which like on the surface feels feminist, it feels pro women, But as soon as you just like scratch the surface just slightly, you realize that what that is is not pro woman at all. It is not anti patriarchy. It is actually more like an agent of the patriarchy. It is more like the type of white women who have bought into the patriarchy so much that they can't see other genders and they can't see through the weeds, right like so, like you know, because to suggest that the only way to gift Medusa with a lack of assault is to make her hideous or whatever you know, people want to read it is like terrifying to me, or make her monstrous or whatever. Like it not only erases the fact that in every single other version of Medusa ever, she is born a gorgon. It's just and she's not necessarily ugly, She's just literally who she is. That's just who she was, and like it erases that, and then just like with Ifa, it erases the fact that it is very explicit that he is like no, like I mean literally the story is that he and his mother know that he is biologically female, and nobody else knows, and he's with his entire life with everyone, his father included, believing he is a man, Like, yeah, this is not This is not somebody who's like I feel like a woman and I'm being forced not to be, Like no, this is it sounds more like gender justice for you, Like it sounds more like somebody who is figuring themselves out and it's like no, no, like I would just like that my gender like affirmed, Like I would like, isis you know, through transformation to affirm my gender? And yeah, like I think that, Yeah, to suggest that like that it's the patriarchy, it's just like, I mean, I'm not wanting to say that something is not the fault of the patriarchy, because everything is, let's be honest. Yeah, but yeah, like it to me doesn't read like that in this case. It reads like yeah, like like if it just wants them them that they've known for their entire life to be affirmed via a goddess interaction, and it's so.
Tied up with loving empty like that is the thing that yes, at the end of the day. Everything else like what we don't see in life the story at all is like a love of masculine behavior outside of sex, a love of you know, we don't see any relationships where life is praised, like enjoys being referred to as a man or anything like that. We see he loves this woman the way he wants to love this woman is as a man. Therefore, that's how the story works for him. And I think, like it's totally reasonable to say that that's maybe not the most positive representation of trans identity in the universe.
Isn't known for good they existed exactly, and like.
Why should we expect of it to give us a good representation of transidentity. Well, yeah, like I totally don't. What I do think is important is that readers, whether they're trans or not, can look at of it and pull out this stuff even if we didn't intend it. None of it is based in reality. And there is some really interesting suggestion to we have some really obscure references to sex change operations in historical documents, right, and they don't have a clue what's going on biologically, Like these these descriptions make it very clear they don't understand how sexuage.
Operation would work, but they're still thinking about it.
It's something that is at least perceived to be plausible within the world, and it doesn't matter whether it was or not, because so many things that we think about today were not claus in the ancient world. But we don't really read the text thing it didn't exist.
Like well, that's the thing, Like all of this is not to be seen as yeah, like some great ancient trans story that makes everyone happy and everyone gets what they want. It's evidence that even in the ancient world, there were people who were born in a body that did not feel like the right one to them, and they like it was acknowledged in some way in these ancient sources. Like it's literally just evidence that the concept of somebody feeling that they are the wrong gender like existed. I mean there's also the I don't know if you know much about this, and I have been I will be doing more research hopefully, but like I meant, like just came out, But there's the like Emperor, Yeah, who I am a woman the air.
I am so not a historian, to the point that sometimes my students like ask me about battle.
I'm sorry, I'm the same. I just covered the Bronze age for a month and I'm like, all of my that was all my assistant producer writing that, and me going this sounds smart, Makila, thank.
You, and as like, so this is going to be the most uninformed take ever about because I fully don't know.
That's great, So am I we'll like, we'll just talk about.
Yeah, as I understand it, it's one of those things where we have some sources that don't love eligabalis that and think what's a really good way we can solve eligabis? And that's feminis in language. But at the same time, you don't make that kind of story up about someone out of thin air, because the story has presumably got to mean something to the person who's reading it. They've got to go, yeah, actually, I recognize this story about this empress and I can kind of identify with them. Yeah. And also, why am I looking to the I think it's the script or is history iagos the writers of the history of the later Empress? Why am I looking to them to give me a good trans narrative? Like I fully don't need to, but if a person who reads that story goes, you know, enough of the pieces here are coming together that I can sort of make a puzzle out of them, Why shouldn't they Like, I don't know enough about the story to know how much there is in the original.
Text, But yeah, no, I don't. I remember hearing that there's like a I don't know if it's a quote or maybe somebody attributing a quote, but basically saying that I want to be a woman or something like that. Yeah, I mean, yeah, if anything, if anything, again, like basically what you're saying is like, it's still proved the concept of gender at least, like you know, identity not matching biology. It was at least conceptualized. Even if it was used as an insult, it is still proof that it was a concept.
Absolutely, And there are so many of these stories because the problem almost the problem with this sometimes is that you need to spend so long when you're talking about these stories in a public context defending the possibility that they can be read through a queer or a trans lens, that you end up spending on doing that and not just saying, look how many of them are, and you get like, you know, you've got these words and ovid, You've got stories in lution of this character Neigulus, who is undoubtedly some kind of trans masculine. You've got the various groups of people at Rome who are not feeling normative gender categories, even if they are maybe somewhere on a trans spectrum. So you've got the Kenidi, who are these kind of like I mean, if you to say the general definition of them, they're people who like to receive anal sex, but that's also complicated in various places. But they're not occupying like a typical masculine gender, and sometimes they're describe with feminine pronouns, feminine adjectives to matter. You've got the Tribadas, who maybe do or know exist, but any way I talked about in literature, who are a group of quote unquote women who perform extremely masculine behaviors and have been theorized more recently as being as being transmitent to You've got you know, the Galley, who are this group of priests for the God of Sabelli who ritually castrate themselves, which is not being and of its self gender transformation. But so many of the stories about them treat them also like their undergoing gender transformation. That all of this together, and I kind of wanted to just give you like a throwing list of them, because when you take it all together, you go the number like normativity is just that it's a particular group of normal people in the world who behave in a normal way, but there are so anything can deviate from that, and deviation does not have to necessarily mean trans or queer. But it doesn't mean we can preclude or not use those labels either, if they're appropriate and they fit mm hmm. And I don't yeah, I don't necessarily want to make it sound like I'm saying that everything one of those groups is definitely trans. No, no, yeah, but they're all definitely queer because they're all saying fuck you to normativity into normal rules about gender and how you do gender.
Yeah. Yeah, they're all going beyond the standardized binary in some way.
Yeah, exactly.
I do of the priest, but I didn't know of the other two examples that was really yeah, so and they're.
Not because they're not pathological, right, they always turn up so particularly.
I also don't know all that much unless people tell me about it. I like when people come on about room, but I don't like to read about it. It's too much.
That's very fair an idea, really fascinating. They turn up mostly in kind of various abuse poetry, so that Roman satire or Roman epigram things where people are going to how you go at each other?
Which does I like, I've never heard such term abuse poetry before. Sorry, I like, I really got me. That was really good.
Have a Hipponaxus are absolutely I mean there's a horrible sexual sort in there too, so that they're not totally but there's some great stuff in there. Yeah, but no, so you see them like Marshall's a great example where he'll just talk about a group of people saying, you know, women these days don't even like real men. They like canidie and what the like? What does it mean to say they like canidie?
Is this like a connection to like the island? Is it an island or is it the town? Like I'm just thinking of the afrodit of Canidos, which is so like yeah.
Yeah, so not like yeah, but more so not Canidos but Idos with an actual eye in there. Oh okay, but yeah, and it probably means something like ver like kinetic okay, and it's probably do with them like dancing with their buttons and shaking them to come and fuck me kind of fight.
Yeah.
But yeah, so they turn up and again these are men. We talk The texts talk about them as men, but some texts also say give them like the crowd of Canidie who are like women, and you go back to napulaus they turn us a crowd of femalekenid and you go, well, yeah, and I guess they are deviating from a masculine idea of gender. There so these groups that they're all over the place, and to kind of rigidly say that Rome exists on a gender binary when the Romans themselves fully understand that the man who penetrates as a particular kind of man and everyone else is necessarily like a real man. And I'm not using the word real men, because that's what like Marshall does. He talks about the wary, weary, the real men as opposed to all of these quote unquote men who are getting fucked and therefore not real men. You know.
Yeah, so I mean, ah, the ancient world, because like I'm just connecting this all degrees, you know, which of course has like very similar and very different like but again it's it's got all the same deviations, all the same like beyond these binaries issues. I also just have to say this made me think of this, But I recently wrote a big thing on Medusa, and so I did, like I did a dive into like almost any source ancient source that I could find that ever mentioned her in anyway, and there I believe Yeah, no, it was Diedorus Siculus who wrote about how because there was like a lot of there's a lot of versions that want to like rationalize her and be like this is where the story came from, right, And I think his is like the one where it's like, oh, the Gorgons were actually like the Amazon's like another race of warrior women, and they actually fought the Amazons. But then and they were like all amazing and they were so good at what they did and all this, and then uh, Heracles came and killed them all because as the leader of men, he was not willing to let any woman lead any country, so he killed them. And then and then but explicitly, when when did ours like explains about them and like how powerful as warriors they were, he says they're nothing like women of today, and I'm just like, okay, cool. So like even when you want to acknowledge this like race of women who you know, by Roman standards, were going to be like men, like that's right, obviously the kind of purpose behind it, He's like, there used to be women who were like men. They're nothing like the women of today, because the whole idea is like, well, these women of today are not men because real men blah blah blah blah. Anyway, it was just it was such like a It was one of the one of the few sources where I was like, I'm really torn on this. Half of it is really cool and half of that is utterly morrified.
But that's so that's so indicative. I think of how of like what a Roman author does when they encounter a strong woman and how deal with it, which is you're like, it's all enough, like now exactly. And I think actually, like if we look at the warrior women who turn up in Latin texts, like they are so obviously treated not as women in a sense, and I think such a great example, like even let's stay with the Metal Phosies is like Atalanta when she turns up she is like explicitly a woman. There's none you know, there's gender play, but it's not gender play in a way you're ever going to go. There's a man. Yeah, but the text doesn't know what to do with her because she has to be sexy, because you woe the tide a woman be anything other than sexy. So Ovin goes out of his way to say, look, she's gorgeous, hairs jews over her back, her body is like ivory. You know, it's this really erotic description of her. But at the same time, she's like beating men all the time, and like, how does he reconcile it's like sexualized woman and the fact that she is beating all the men. Ovin doesn't give us the story that like Hygienus does, where she chases them with swords and kills them all. But he doesn't know what to do with that.
He doesn't know how to gender I'm gonna like just mix up what sources what because I haven't looked at Atlanta in a while, but because when I last looked at Atlanta, I was really interested in separating her into two different forms, like the one who super powerful and does all this incredible stuff, and then the other one who falls for a golden apple and then has to get married because to me, they were because also there's very explicitly sources that suggest that she's from two very different places and has two very different backstories. So I was like, Okay, I like the idea of two different Atalantas because also it doesn't fucking make sense with her character in the other story to like make that. But does Avid have the apples?
Do you know? Yes, so he does. It's where I fully admit that that particular episode of your podcast inspired me to write an art Atlanta absolutely because you were stressing so hard how these two different women and of it has two different Atalanta stories but different women. Yeah kind of are and are different women?
Well yeah, because Ovid wouldn't want to be like no, no, simple. Yeah, and that's not.
Really interesting because you went through sources and you're so right. The other sources are so explicit about these being different women. Yeah, And it's not just he does does this to a great degree. In any other ro and poet, he sort of kind of blends them a little bit, and in some places it's explicitly confused. So I think obi've mentioned Atalanta like about fifteen times across all this poetry, and on one occasion it's definitely unambiguously a blended figure. It's like a bit of the Skinae and Atalanta and a bit of the Ocean Atlanta. But in the mets specifically he does mix them together. So you get the story of the Caledonian war hunting book a which is all you know, it's pretty standard, the Calorian war hunt all that kind of stuff. It doesn't deviate too far from the mythology, but the language that's used of her there gets really explicitly picked up when he tells the story of Skinae and Atalanta of Arcadian Atlanta around. But the one who whose father is Skine is the one who does the apples and foot.
That's where the word yeah, yeah, yeah no, because I feel like the Arcadian one is the one who is raised by bears, because right, yeah, yeah, because it's all about bears.
Yeah, you're so right, so yeah, but it's.
Confusing because of where kaled On is because yeah, so I'm with you.
But yeah, the book ten Atalanta is described like in very similar ways to the Bookaete Atlanta, and there are some very deliberate, like textual things of it does. When he's describing the book eight one to say, keep your eyes peeled, she's going to come back later, and then she does so, so that was that really kind of got me thinking, these are two different women who ob wants to blend into one woman instead both doing gender defying things, and it's so explicitly about gender, so you get think. I think it's in the book a description where she's described as like having the face a face that would seem girlish in a boy or boyish in a girl, and you go, okay, I know, Atalanta, we've hung out, you know. And then in book ten when the character comes back, the same descriptions applied to Hippomonies her her lover. He has a face that's like boy boy, and you go, so you're connecting these two stories, aren't you going up your way to make me connect them together? Yeah? So they're definitely is weird gender stuff going on there?
That's so interesting. I definitely did not. I was just like, what may Yeah the Adelantavi ital I feel very vindicated, Thank you so much for telling me. But as I'm trying to think back on my sources now like is it that, Yeah, because they really do appear. It's Ovid who really is the only one who does like a full comprehensive anything. Yeah, you'd be like, nah, they're the same.
They turn up super briefly. I think one of them, the woman the foot race, turns up briefly in in easy It's catalog or women. Yeah, right, and I think the other one might turn up in somewhere else. But they both they both have ancient histories exactly.
Yeah, they're both very have very ancient origins and definitely, like you know, there's stuff in both the regions and I know, yeah, there's there's a lot of like fragments that suggest that she is very ancient as a character. But yeah, like there was I make it would make sense if Avid was the first one to make them into one, or or even if he's not doing it explicitly, to lead modern people to be like there's one Atalanta.
Yeah, at least to play them together in a re explicit way. Yeah. Yeah, I made a little table about like which different Atlanta stories, which was really nerdy of me, but it is basically, yeah, of it who mixes them together and makes things a bit more confusing and yeah, it's it's this weird reference to his ibis where he can't decide which Atalanta is clearly in that particular and he mixes them together there too, but they're pretty explicitly separated out before that until you get the story of I think it's a polonious roads. That's what tells where he goes. I don't know, she was maybe three different people and maybe have four different boyfriends. I can't tell you anything more than that. I'm sorry, So you know, and that's he's probably post of it, so he's probably drawing at that point already on this tradition where they've been reblended.
He's yeah, I mean he does a lot. He has a lot of like things that are almost certainly coming from Avid.
Yeah. Yeah, huh so yeah, she's she's fascinated. So thank you for getting that because I fully went down that rabbit hole because of that episode.
This is thrilling. So you wrote an article about it?
Yeah?
Could you send it to me?
Absolutely definitely. It's very like literary because it's all about genre and stuff.
No, but I love that. I mean, this is I'm just thrilled that by like the thing I was like I'm going to read two different episodes because I'm mad that that turned into something more legitimate.
So yeah, but it was just really odd to me.
Yeah, yeah, I think also Jennifer Saint was inspired by my episode. Sorry, I just have to say, like, apparently my Atalanta episodes have just done more than I thought. So I'm just this is like, this is a feel good moments, very.
Fruitful went on to create so many things. That's so brilliant. Sorry you're saying, probably if Ovid s he's an opportunity to mess with things and mess with time and mess with what you expect a story to be about, he fully will. Because oh while we're Atalanche's a sidetary token Atlanta for Avid. She is the epitome of like sexual So in the amatory, I think you show I sure have Yeah, the end of book three, so the literal climax of the whole poem. The last mythological character terms in the Arzamatori is Atalanta, where she's explicitly turning up because she's got great legs, so if you have sex with her in certain positions, you'll be able to look at her legs better. And she's in this catalog of like different positions you have sex with different women in because they have different physical features, And I love the O. It's like goodbye to mythology. In the Arsomatoria is put Atalanta's legs over your shoulder because they look great, fantastic, no notes.
The RS is like so joyfully fucked up, so fucked up, so fucked up. Yeah ah, I mean of it like for all that, I absolutely love them at and the Urs for very different reasons, but like really, I just think a lot about the ways in which our modern understanding of Greek mythology have been forever altered by that man just being because and he didn't know. He was just like I'm writing a thing. This is like a fun poem. I'm writing. I'm gonna take a lot of inspiration from Greek myths. I'm going to change some stuff because I want to. And then two thousand years later people are like, Medusa was a priestess of Athena and she was beautiful and she was transformed, and I'm like, it's a thing that he made up because it was funsies Like yeah, and now with Atlanta too, I'm like every book you pick up now that's just called Greek mythology. I mean, even mine probably says it, even though I hope I made a point, But that was years ago, So who's the same, Like, but you know, everyone's like, this is one Atlanta. She was incredibly heroic. She did an amazing and wonderful things. She didn't want to marry a man, except there was this time that she got really distracted by a golden apple, and so she married a guy. Like it's just yeah, but I love.
When you said O didn't know what he's doing. I think the Met is so intentionally.
Oh, I mean like that he didn't Oh yeah, he didn't expect that two thousand years later people would be like, this is the Greek myth is what I mean?
There's so much like no inkness, and like sometimes you know, I've been reading the met for years and I wrote a whole PhD on them, like I Met is my poem inside out, and still sometimes I'm reading it. I just what did you slide? Dog? Like, how did you slip that under my nose for the last nine years when You've been making this clever little reference here, I've never picked up on that before. That's a genius and it's it's such a knowing poem about like how can I change everything and make it Roman? But more importantly make it mine, because if it's Roman, I don't want it to be like Augustuses or any emperors or anything like it. It's mine. And that's I mean, I know you've done the reason your podcast, but the way the met ends with that such an explanation of like for all of time I will be read, wrote like foreign neck lips will read my work. You go, you had so such a big idea of yourself of it, and you're right to be fair.
I mean, he's yeah, like it worked, Like you know, we can't. We can't say he didn't succeed.
He did kind of eat. I can't. I can't critique that.
Yeah, I don't. I forget what I was reading. I think I was just reading some I've just been like finding random like indie published novels lately that I can just like buy for cheap and read and not remember anything after I finished reading them, but enjoyed in the moment. And I definitely like this morning read something where somebody just referenced of it in some book. I think it was like a fantasy book and somebody was like you read of it like I just thin't care, Like he really, I mean, the dude got around like he's just been everywhere.
And it's so like the history of Ovid when you get into the Middle Ages in a medieval period, like so much of why we think great anthology is being of it. Did this is because he becomes the source book for painters. Yeah, and you get those lovely moralized versions of of it. You know that there's the French Avid Moralis and as in Latin called the Ovid Moralis artists, which are just like Ovid if you made in Christian. But then also, let's use this to inspire every Tissian painting and every Jotto painting for the next four hundred years, so that our imagery of like what like if you google any college of character, you're going to get some kind of Renaissance painting of them. Oh yeah, And our whole way we think about it is so focused on how Ovid told those stories. Like one of my favorite paintings is Titians Diana and Acting, and it's that wonderful one where Diana is chasing him and her bows pulled and he's falling to the floor and his half turned into a stag, but not fully so. His head's stag and his arms are human still, And it's so directly lifted from it, like down to the color of like which of the three dogs who are biting acting on they're the three dogs who run ahead in the race, and of it, you know, it's so taken from that story. Wow, And I think that's so much of it is that we don't know one paints the Greek myth until I can get to the graphite, you know well.
And and then there's also the Latin of it all right, just how much more readable Latin was for so long and how much more people were taking in Greek things via Latin, you know. So yeah, I mean it's unsurprising and also incredibly annoying.
Like I.
Just this Meduca thing made it so clear to me because I'm just like, I'm so deeply over Ovid's version of her, and I'm just like I just wanted the Greek. But like even there's this History Channel video that I saw in my research, and I mean it's the History Channel, but it has like very I mean, I assume that most of the talking heads on it are you know, also fairly well known but one of them I did know personally, and it presents this entire story of Medusa and all of these experts and all of this stuff, and it says the Greek myth, Greek myth, Greek myth, over and over and over again, and then proceeds to tell Ovid's version of the story. And I just am like, like, I just it's still like this thing. It's it's just done so much. Anyway, this is what about Medusa, even though my head can make it, but let's.
Make it briefly, please. My whole my obsession with at the moment is which of itd version, because of it tells two in the mesimal phosies, but one of them is three works long, so everyone misses it. You get the whole book four story that's really detailed. Then in book six, in Iracti's tapestry, Iraqne stitching all of these women who've be insulted by the gods, and one of them, in genuinely like a line and a half of the Latin so probably like a line of any English translation, is Meducer. But it's a different story. What because this book he's got to be a story, because she's already got snaky hair when Neptune assualts right, which doesn't make sense. Yeah, it's just the Greek version, just the Greek version. But also we get absolutely no reference to the Temple of the the stuff. That's I mean, it's only half line months you expect that. But moreover, Neptune's a bird, Like Neptune is not a bird. You feel that in book four when Percy is telling that story about Medusa getting so that he would mention if Neptune was a bird, for sure he doesn't.
And so in this like brief half lives, why would Neptune be a bird in any case?
So this is like something I delved into very deeply, because Neptune is never a bird. This is the only time if ormphology, Neptune is a bird. And the best bit about this is that this is explicitly like a story for how Pegasus came about.
So why would he Why would it be a bird? Yeah, why would it be a bird? Because she's gonna give birth to a horse.
Because he's a Neptus, the god of horses. Like it's such an obvious he turns into horses in so many mythologies.
He another goddess as.
A horse another goddess. He turns up next on that tapestry by the way, God, Yeah, exactly as a horse. But it's so obvious that he should be a horse when he gives birth to a horse or rather, but he's a bird, and I can only think that that's ovid slash eacte deliberately go and you think you know the story of produced from the book four this is a from the story, like he's got them both.
Yeah, I'll sort of realize how many times I've said fuck off, as it's not totally common, and I apologize it does show just how impressed and excited I am. That's just how I react. I swear when I can't think of anything else to say. I like slash when I feel like somebody could take you. But I like, I that's really fucking interesting. Yeah, there I did it again. The bird is so weird because I want it, Like I like that. I love though that she already has the snaky hair, because like that's that's the stance that I just think is kindest to her, to the Greek origins to the story is just that, like I still think she was assaulted by Poseidon, Like I think that that is very explicit in the hes. Yet even if nobody agrees with me, that's not true. Some people agree with me, but not the men on the internet. But like it, she it just makes so much sense. She was literally just born that way, Like it's so much kinder to be like, she wasn't ugly, she was just a monster. Monsters don't have to be ugly, they just have to be inhuman. Yeah, and like yeah, she was terrifying, but she was terrifying because she could protect herself, not because she was going to come get you, you know, like and and like the Athena thing is just so unnecessary like in Avid, I mean and and just I don't know, it's so interesting. And also one thing I've I recently sort of just registered is just that Avid does not call her a priestess of Athena or of Minerva, even though like half the people who read who who like conceptualize Avid's version or like she was a priestess, and it's like no, no, she was just in the temple and like people just went into temples. That was very normal, and there are.
Some pretty good reasons why like a young, presumably virginal Greek woman might be in a temple to Athena, like, yeah, that's a terfect.
Reason thing for her to be doing incredibly normal.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, No, it's it's so interesting how like we think we know things about of it or even about Greup mythology, and so often we just have sort of got a kind of maybe half created version that we've added things to, which I'm sure I've done all the time too, But it's so I.
Mean, yeah, it's hard because you do end up taking it in from all of these sources, even if you are reading the ancient sources, like it's still like we're just existing in the twenty first century, where so much has become seemingly like can in quote unquote you know, in whatever way, and it's it's easy sometimes to be like or to forget or just like overlook the fact that like, oh wait, that's not actually from the ancient world at all.
I think for me, that's so much of what's happening on a Rackney tapestry. I think Rachney tpaps story is a whole other mess in the like, so much is going on there and there are so many ways to read it. A bit like what we were saying with with like iphis. There's so many you can read it. But to me, it's so noticeable how every single, nearly every single story on there is either not the version we have elsewhere, or really different to the version we have elsewhere, or deliberately picks up on the less common way of that story is told. But it seems to me that that's just a consistent catalog of Rapney saying not only what's going on with gender and the gods and the mortal women and godsses, but also, let me show you all of these untold stories, all these like paths. The Metamorphoses could have gone down and told you all these stories that you know, we don't get a story of Asteria in the metamal Phoses, even though she turns into an island. That's so peaked Metamorphoses vibes she turns into an island. We don't get that except for like this brief reference in the Rackneys Tapestry. Yeah, and even there it's the wrong way round because she I mean, on the Rackney's tapestry we have that Jupiter turns into an eagle and assaults her. Every other version that myth tells you that she turns into a Quail and runs away from Jupiter and this is.
A hysteria, you're saying, right, yeah, that's yeah, that's really we.
Could go through like a Ritney s Actually, line by line, almost every story does this where it's not the version you expect, or it's slightly different to the version you expect, or it's just just like messing with it. And I think it's just this explosion and like if the mest Morphoses had an extra twenty books, what could have been Like yeah.
Well, and it's almost like this kind of acknowledgment that OVID was, like I did the stories the way I wanted to in the met but here are the other versions, and I know the.
Other versions and I can tell them if I wanted to. And that's so many of the stories, when you really get deep into them, have that like a little acknowledgment of the other version of the story just hiding behind it, which is beautiful. And when I show these students, you always tell them just like this, like this man, how dare he? Yeah?
Yeah, I think I think that a lot, just generally like everything about him. But there's so many contradictions. Yeah exactly, yeah, very good and bad. Like I'm very torn about how I feel it in an enjoyable way to kind of like link it back up to if this, because I could talk about everything forever. Oh I love I love a good off topic, absolutely, and I literally like I could. I could keep you for hours talking about Irackney, but I will not. But maybe we'll talk about the future. But the I would love I meant to ask this earlier. I would love to know if you have any thoughts on why it is that it's Isis who changes him?
Sure, so there's like a more obvious and less obvious answer. I think. I think the more obvious answer is hidden in the description of the parade of Egyptian gods who turn up at the beginning of me right so when So Right at the beginning of the If, just after mother Telefuser has fallen pregnant and has realized, ah, what if it's a girl. If it's a girl, I'm going to be screwed, she has this dream in which a load of different Egyptian gods and goddesses come to her right, and it's it's all the usual suspects, you know, all the there and then you get Isis and you get a Cirius and a ciris and Isis are kind of partnered here as they often are in mythology, and Isis has very prominently these two gleaming horns that are super phallic and look like wits, and a siris very particularly is described there as often as being the god who is always looking for his penis because of the story that you know, his body gets chopped up and it's like missing, but of it doesn't have to mention the fact that a cirus is looking for his penis and missing his pens or the isis is this goddess with penis horns, And I do think that's like your little hint as a reader, this is going to be a story about characters of Genitalia doesn't necessarily match up to the genders.
Interesting, you know, we have.
The goddess that the force is female bodied person, although she's mostly cowbodied, but you know, female cowbodied person who is got extra appendages, and then this male bodied god who is lacking his appendages. So that that to me seems like a really good reason as to why it's Isis. Yeah. Yeah. Another. So the other one I guess generally is that because it's I think I mentioned earlier in the if we have Antonius Liberals correctly recording nick Ander's version from then it's it's the goddess Litho Latona there, So it's not it's not Isis at all. I think the other reason why it's Isis there has to do with what Isis is doing in the Metamorphoses more generally, which is that she's the character Io who turns it right at the beginning, and Ovid wants to draw connections. You know, there's this tradition that the Greeks like to bring about that I think is the first one to mention that when Io has been turned into a cow after being assaulted by j she had going a wander all around the world and eventually turns into the GY's isis when you which just Egypt.
Yeah, it's their way of being like we are a little bit older than the Egyptian.
Yea, we actually have this this woman who did all of the colonialism because she wandered everywhere, made it all Greek.
Yeah, and then she because then she gave birth to babies who then went on to found the Peloponnese. And so here we are like yeah, yeah, but he.
Ofvid deliberately draws connections between Isis in book nine and Io in book two and one, as if to kind of make you remember that that's a character. He's already turned up. Now. Io doesn't have that much weird stuff going on with gender, but she does have weird things going on with her body and a certain dysphoria about her body. It's a beautiful scene in book two where I looked into a river or into a puddle or something, and that's the first time that she realizes that she's been turned into a cow. And you get that bit where she tries to speak and she can't speak, And there's a do you remember idol on the kind of lovely online feminist classics journal that last half five five minutes.
It closed before I really got into the world and academia.
This it was too bad, but yeah, there was a great article in there. But this is fully from memory. So if I've got this person's name wrong, I'm so sorry. I think my son called Sasha Barish or Bearish, which was talking about comparing the Io and the Isis story, the Io story and the Ifist story and saying that like for their experiences, they didn't identify And I'm so sorry, I cannot remember what flavor of transsha Parish was, but they were saying that they didn't identify with the Iphis story of the story of dysphoria, but the Io story they absolutely do. This moment of looking in the mirror and seeing a body that's not the body you think should be there, and that disconnect. Now, all of that to say, I do wonder if there is something really subtle about having isis the goddess who, in her own life, her own perio of experience, had a bodily disconnect, and the obbit Is explicitly told her she had a bodily disconnect, and she turns up here with her kind of penis like horns that aren't quite befitting of this female goddess, And all of that connects to the very scene that Iphis will have when he stands there and says, what is my body? I don't understand this? How do I make this work? How do I love this woman? That's maybe really tinfoil hattie, but it seems to me, if you're going to choose a goddess to do that, she's a pick.
Well, and she has quite a unique pic like I don't know if he does, he said it in Egyptory. I think he's just kind of is vague about where it's happening, right the especially the concrete Oh yeah, so we've got that like kind of Southern connection.
Yea.
But yeah, like it's it's intentional. I mean, obviously Isis also by the time of Ovid, like just for the listeners, like Isis was a fairly large goddess in the more classical world of Greco Roman everything. But still it's a very like still you're choosing a like historically Egyptian god and aligning them with other like Egyptian gods that didn't become as popular, and.
Because that was a way to make her like the Egyptian that's sort of by including all these other ones. And they've got instruments a way to make this an Egyptian scene. If you want me to get even more.
Tin for HATTI, do you have time? I have time.
I always have time for tin for Okay, his story of Biblis that's just happened has involved so the story of Biblists goes straight into the story of IFIs, and there they're connected into one of the Biblists and spy turning into a fountain of it says, that's a really weird thing. Crete's famous for really weird things, for example, do you know about the story office, So they're deliberately connects to that very tenuous line of weird ship happens.
That's so funny because like Create is known for very weird things, but.
Like not because mostly makes this story up. And yeah, she's she's Cretan, or he's Cretan, or they're Cretan. The in the Canda version that Haskay mixing my people so so fair.
I can't imagine jan.
Exactly. That's why that's where I went. So that's also on Cree. But Bibliss has been on this long journey, this like ridiculously kind of incomprehensibly long journey after so to recapt story again, she tries to the brother. He says no, she keeps translating her brother. He runs away. She gets sad. She runs away and there presumably the story takes place in the West coast and I got my directions right, and it's really, yeah, the west coast of Turkey, right, So what I was thinking too, like Carrier that kind of and she ends up by the end of her story like in the Levant. So she hears this massive, big journey across what we now call Turkey and down into what we now call the Levant. It ends up probably somewhere and Syria mm hm, which is obviously an incomprehensively long journey for someone to run while crying the entire time. Yeah.
Connected with Io, though, but.
Connected directly with the route that Io coasts. That's my tinfoil hat connection, is that it?
I mean, I'm on the same exactly, so you.
Know, it's a one size fit all tinfoil hat. Yeah. But yeah, maybe there's this, I mean sort of thing that Ovid would do to trace that same route Io just before he brings Io back on stage and reminds, you, look, I did Io in book two. I'm doing Io now as isis in book nine. It's the same.
Maybe yeah, yeah, I mean, it certainly seems at the very least that he was like, Hey, this is a connection I could make, you know, even if he's not making some big depth thing about it, Like he's like hmm yeah, you know, like and mean, I wonder if there's something this feels like it would be not necessarily kind to the story of it. But like I wonder if there's some kind of connection in the look Bibliss didn't get.
No, I think that that is totally fair though, Okay, because Book nine, like does have these weird, like bad love stories that don't quite go right, and that pushes on into Book ten, right, which is the story of when you get the Song of Orpheus, who does all these stories of loves that go wrong? And one of those stories of mirror directly pick something the story Biblis and book nine, So that connection is to be there. Yeah, in between those two stories, particularly with life is being the only happy one in the met and that's what you know. Every article was like, it's the only happy one, so anyone's explicitly happy.
Yeah, I mean it's one of the only explicitly happy love stories in all of classical mythology. Like I put out a call, like I just tweeted out like it was around Valentine's Day, and I was like, can anyone think of a love story in Greek mythology that does have a happy ending? And a lot of people reference that if it's an anthe and I was like, Roman, I don't get it, Like I So, I mean they're really like happiness is relative.
Yeah, I think there is something we are going on with Biblis fails at love and IFIs succeeds at love because they're different love objects and how they go about them. The whole purpose of the Biblis story revolves around how communication is key and how do communication right is key because Biblis first writes a letter to her brother. Yeah, and that obviously doesn't go too well because if you have a letter that says, dear brother, I'd like to do the nasty nasty with you, you're kind of not really feeling up to it. But afterwards, oh, there's this huge speech where she goes, oh, I clearly spoke to him wrong, Like my communication was bad. Maybe if I'd chosen a different day, or if I'd spoken to him face to face rather than sending a letter. And so that story revolves around, Yeah, incest is bad, but particularly communication is important.
If you could have communicated your ancest request a little bit better, maybe it might have gone differently.
But then I Fi doesn't communicate, like we never hear speak. We only get Iphis's side of the story. And there is this you know, in many ways, it's kind of the other way round. It's not a story of incests. It's the story of gender confusion. It's not a story in which communication happens but failed, story of communication doesn't happen and it succeeds. It's not a story in which a woman well. It is also the biest story. This is the story in which a potentially quote unquote woman tries to exercise masculine desire in a different way. Biblict tries to excise masculine desire by being a woman, by chasing her brother. I just tries to excise master desire by being a man and successfully wins. So there is this kind of paralleling of those two stories of it sets up in the way he connects them on that little hinge of weird shit be happening in crete.
That's really yeah, that's really interesting. I mean in a place where the woman had sex with a ball, I mean, you know.
And that's what I first says, right, Yeah, this is the land where with a ball and I can't find love. Yeah, exactly.
Oh, and that's why I do does it to like pull it back to that, because I think we've talked a lot about it as a trans reading, which I think is equally important. But I do also still like the idea of it being a reading of two women who loved each other but were not in a world where they were permitted to be together, and this was their way of being together. Because yeah, like that that I just remember that moment that like kind of I mean you have to relate, suspend disbelief of like okay, yeah, passed by like she was able to love herble and like you know, why can't I? And so I think it, Yeah, it was. It's kind of obviously like again, like we were talking about with other things, like nothing about any of this should be read as like an ideal story of weirdness in the ancient world, because that just it's not the way this works. But what it is is evidence for these like the acknowledgment of something beyond yeah, the standard binary, and people who lived outside of it in the ways in which they might have conceptualized that ability.
You know, have you ever read Annie Smith's Girl Meets Boy? No, Like, it's about one hundred pages old, and it is it's the only reception of the ice in the Oh yes.
Somebody I've been told about this.
Yeah, And the thing I love most about that I really enjoyed it is the thing I love most about it is that it does not settle on the genders of those protagonists at all. So what we nominally have is a lesbian couple can meet an odd time in one of their's life and then they get together and they go and could worries together, which is great. But the second person in the lesbian couple, the one who I guess is IFIs in this story why maybe even like the amplaining story, it's not clear. It's called Robin Goodfellow, so there's a lot of masculinization in that name. And then they go round, and I've been in some years i've read this, they go around when they're doing the eco terrorism, writing little notes that say we are the Messenger girls, we are the Messenger boys, and they alternate between being the Messenger girls and the Messenger boys. So even in that retelling just two thousand and six, I think there's a deliberate like, I'm not going to settle on what their genders are because it doesn't actually matter. It's a story of queer love, and the queer reading doesn't matter where they fit on that spectrum.
Yeah, huh oh, that's really interesting. Also, I love that it kind of links. I'm gonna link it back to the two thousand and six of it all and be like, oh, that's nice. There was like a good also form of exactly here we go the most the reasonable and well accepted version of bisexuality, and then the absolutely bizarre, nonsensical way of using the word.
Absolutely.
It does remind me of bi weekly, how it's like which one twice a.
Week as someone who can't count and can't do time that is like the.
Exist youah no, same as somebody who releases their episodes twice a week and has ADHD and just generally is like, I don't know, I don't even remember. I think that I know that at some point I had to set it up in Apple, and I think I think they put in brackets like.
What we mean?
That was like great, I don't remember if it's bi weekly or semi weekly, but here we go.
We'll take it. We're running with it.
Oh my gosh, this has been so much fun. I love that we talked out so many more characters, just like so much of the met No no no, I truly know. I'm saying this with all honesty, like one of the things that I love about talking to people is when they we get on these tangents because like I can talk about almost any mythological character and I love to so like if we can connect to more, I mean, especially in the met because like I'm slowly having more and more conversations about it. Thankfully, people keeping like, hey, I studied it, want to talk and I'm like I do, but yeah, like it's it's such a fascinating text that I've read in so many different forms over so many years. But having these insights from people who study it and know the Latin and everything, it's just it's so it's such a joy. So thank you so much. I'm I'm I'm probably finally made this work. This was like a year in the making. I was I'm pretty sure at least I was explicit. Often I'm just like have to goos people by accident because I have a bad brain. But at the very least I think this time I was like, no, no, we're gonna come back for next year's Pride.
Is not canceled.
I will like hell bent on always having Pride content In June, despite having kind of exhausted the midst, there's minimal and most of it involves somebody dying a tragic death. Here we are, you know, but not not if it's an I am what enjoy? Is there anything you want to share with my listeners about reading more from you or following anything? You don't have to, but here's your opportunity.
I'm on Twitter, if you want to follow me. I sometimes tweet about mythology and Latin stuff. Mostly tweet about modern Greek poetry, engayship, but that's okay too, I mean a lot.
I think my listeners would equally like that.
Here we are, so I'm at Joe Wattstein Joe w at TV Frankenstein on the end. And if you really want to read any of my scholarship, it's less dry than me in person. It's more dry than me in person, but very.
Wonderful. I'll link to your Twitter and everything in the episode's description.
Oh but quick note, do to make sure if you do that, it's Joe L. Watson. Otherwise the kind of like alrighty Paul Joseph Watson, who I share half my names with, unfortunately comes up, so like yeah, Joel Watson or Watson classics, because otherwise you'll get some content that is not fun and it's not Joe Watson.
I appreciate that warning. I didn't make the connection because of just the Joe and that's yeah. I bet you live with that in a very awful way a lot of time.
Yeah.
Well, on that light note, Thank you so much again for doing this. This is really really fun, ah Nerds. Thank you as always for listening. That episode was long in the greatest way, so I will keep this outro short and sweet. Let's talk about MIT's Baby was written and produced by me. Liv Albert Michayla Smith is the Hermes to My Olympians. My assistant producer, Laura Smith is the audio engineer and production assistant. The podcast is part of the iHeart podcast Network. Listen on Spotify or Apple or wherever you get your podcasts, and actually check out the Spotify playlist featuring all of the episodes I have done over I imagine seven full years of trying to feature queer and just generally queer stories from the ancient world. There's a Spotify playlist linked in the episode's description for everything I've ever done if you want to hear it all. Thank you all so much as always, what a joy. I love Conversation episodes, I am Live and I Love this shit.