Dynasty trade targets on today’s dynasty fantasy football podcast! Borg, Betz & Jason share their favorite trade for and trade away players with fantasy trade deadlines approaching. Plus, the wildest up-and-down players so far in 2023! Join Borg, Betz, and a Baller each week to take your Dynasty fantasy football game to the next level and dominate your league -- Fantasy Football Podcast for November 15th, 2023.
Connect with The Fantasy Footballers:
Love the show? Leave us a review wherever you listen
Welcome to the Fantasy Footballers Dynasty Podcast with Borg Bets and a baller.
Welcome in. It's Wednesday, November fifteenth. I'm the Fantas Footballers Dynasty Podcast. I'm your host Kyle Organoni, and I am joined by Matthew Betts and Jason Moore.
What's up?
Boys?
Got a big trade week coming up here for dynasty leagues making a push to the playoffs? Are you fellas playoff bound in your leagues?
Oh? Playoff bound? I'm bye week bound, brother, Yes, no, we are, Yeah, I'm I'm on the way. Although my my in our main dynasty league, I was eight and one, just dominant team, and I I had a bunch of bye weeks. I had a lot of guys on by Jalen Hurts and Devonte Smith that stack. I had just a handful of players that I had to swap in. But it was okay because I was playing the hapless one and eight team. Just you know, every dynasty league has the team that is in the process of rebuilding down to the nubs where you're playing nobody's and so that was my matchup. So it was fine, but I lost. I lost this week. My super team got trounced by the worst team in the league. So that's fun. But no, dynasty leagues are going good quick debate time because we are doing a dynasty show and we're talking about trade for and trade away targets today. What is your guys' opinion on whether or not dynasty leagues should have a trade deadline? Should be late early, no trade deadline. You could trade all the way through the playoffs, in the off season every second. Where do you guys stand on that? Because I've seen some hot debates on that topic.
Yeah, I'll just say that the overarching idea that I think people try to say in fantasy is, oh, well there's a trade deadline in the NFL. When you to do it, you could do whatever you want. Okay, So let me just say, do whatever you want with your league. It can work. I do like the leagues that I'm in that have a strict deadline, which is the end of this week, and then I have one that has a week later. So I personally think it's worked out really well. It's created this buying window, this frenzy, and so personally, in my opinion, I like the way that we have it set up that it's this week or next week, depending on your league.
Yeah, I also am in favor of having them. Having a couple leagues that I play, I have both situations where there's no deadline at all. There's one where it's this week, just like the redraft calendar kind of is for most leagues, and then there's one where it's the week before playoffs, so you extend the window a little bit. But I think the deadline, whenever it is for your league is good for the league because it incentivizes teams to get a deal done by a certain date. Whereas like you can him and haul back and forth for a couple of weeks and then you both get busy or you both move on and like doesn't get done. That's not fun in dynasty and not have fun for your league. So when you have that deadline, it also kind of helps you plan ahead obviously for the playoffs, or you know, you can really take advantage if you are a rebuilding team to get some of these bets off your roster where literally in six seven weeks, like their value will change a ton, usually in a negative way, So like those guys you can capitalize on. So I like having a deadline. I think it helps create more league activity.
Yeah, so I'm curious. You say you play in a couple of leagues that have no deadline, right you could trade at any time. I have never played in one of those leagues, but I imagine, like I can't I can't fathom a situation where you're in a championship game, like I'm I made it to the title and now I'm gonna go try to buy everything I can this week, you know, trade for matchups would go all out to win a title, or my opponent doing that, or just the ability to do that. It seems wildly irresponsible for a league. But I guess my question to you is does that happen then, like we when when you get two championship week and those leagues without a trade deadline, are those two teams like going hard in the paint after trades to win that week?
Not really, not as much as you would expect, because you know, there's still some players that teams are gonna say, look like, I know what you what you're trying to do, give me that extra you know, second on top of what you're trying to do, or just try to get a little extra piece in the trade. So it doesn't actually get done quite as much as you would think. The area that I think I I don't like this situation playing out is like, you know, you go on a two or th week run on in the playoffs, whatever it is for your league, and you get to the championship week, and you lose a starter, you lose a stud like that's part of the game that happens, right, But in this situation where there is no deadline, you can just say, look, I have a week to figure it out, and I'm gonna go trade for someone to get in my lineup for this week. And I feels like an unfair advantage. Although if it's the same for everyone in your league, I guess anyone could do it. But interests are part of the game, suspensions, whatever, like that's kind of the lay of the land. So I don't like it for that reason. But no, there's not as much as you would think, like the week of the championship.
The idea of just there's chaos, and we talk about all the time that there are nasty boys that emerge during the Fantasy playoffs. That's part of what I love about Dynasty is that you do have to pivot, so I like having a trade deadline, and let's be honest, like the trade deadline then opens up very quickly right after that in Dynasty leagues where you can trade all the time and your picks only get more valuable as we turn the calendar and go to twenty twenty four, you get to February, March, April, like, those picks only increase. So I feel like people aren't really missing out that much because Dynasty season always lasts. So I don't know, does that feel like I'm a fun sucker?
There?
No, not at all. Feels like you're a smart intelligent man.
I you know what, I will. I will take that. I will take.
If I said feels like feels like you're a smart intelligent man, I did not. I did not say you are. How dare you very clear?
That's I mean, that's it's a giant facade that I know anything about anything. I mean, fantasy football all of us, but spreadsheets, all that stuff. Like I'm doing really good, you know, faking people out over these years thinking that I'm semi smart. So we are glad you're with us. This episode, as we mentioned, is a trade of Paluza. We'll be talking about trade four trade away and even some questions from discord and from the Foot Clan that we will discuss if you want to get all of our tools. So some of the things that we'll be bringing up on the show, a strength of schedule looking ahead to matchups. You can get that at jointhefoot dot com if you want to be a member of the Foot Clans interact with us. All the time, I was getting some questions from our Dynasty Trade advice channel, which is maybe the most popular channel right now, and Jason correct me if I'm wrong. The largest discord for fantasy football on the planet.
I believe we are definitely the largest, most active one. I think there's a total count. We're closing the gap right now. We're either the biggest or the second biggest, but we're certainly the most active.
Yeah, and these are people that want to talk, want to talk trades, and so you will get your question answered. So go to join the Foot dot com if you want to be a part of that. My quick question for us is maybe a selfish emotional exercise, maybe it's a little bit of therapy, but which player for you is giving you the biggest roller coaster moment for you? And dynasty, the meaning there are so many ebbs and flows this season that it is driving you bonkers and bets your answer. Jason easily could have answered this, but you were in the dog first.
That's one hundred percent what it was. This would have been my answer, but you got the floor. Bets.
I mean this, there's not much to say. Everyone that has had this player feels what I'm going to say about Gabe Davis. And it goes all the way back to last year when you were buying into a player attached to Josh Allen who had a massive opportunity to step forward into the wide receiver two roll across from steff On Diggs, and it just hasn't happened. But at the same time, it sort of has happened, right, Like you see these games where Gabe Davis pops up as like the first rud in the offense, the second read at worst. Right, there's games where he comes out and he has these eight, nine, twelve target games and then all of a sudden, the next week it's three targets, it's four targets. It's you just can't even count on him ever in your lineup. You don't know what you're getting, and it's been so frustrating for the better part of a year and a half. Now at this point, his consistency rating in our database is as you would guess an f meaning you can't rely on this player.
Stick.
Yeah, you can't rely on this player. But so scary about him is when you bench him and you guys talked about this last week on the Main Show, is when he goes off. And so it's just this conundrum of this guy that you hope could be something, you don't really know what he is, and he's kind of this just facade in your lineup because you don't know what he is. I also will mention, just from a Dynasty standpoint, like I don't know what to think of Gabe Davis. He is going to be an undrafted or a free agent excuse me, not undrafted, a free agent in twenty twenty four coming up, so there's no real this attachment.
This offseason or he's under contract in twenty.
Four this offseason, he's in his final year of his deal.
Wow.
So I'm just I'm so stuck on Gabe Davis. I've been in, I've been out. I don't know what to do.
I don't think I could buy him right now. I mean, so I'm a Josh Allen manager, and it's tempting to go after that stack. But it's also just really tempting to say, like I just I could get nothing. So when Dalton kin K looks like he's the second read in that offense right now, So yeah, Jason, I know he's driving you insane. Hopefully you bench him this next week.
I do have him benched this next week. I'm very happy to report that, finally, for the first time all season in my league of record, I have gotten healthy enough where I can finally put Gabe Davis on my bench. It's it's very exciting for me, my player who's driven me up and down on a roller coaster of questionable thoughts. This hasn't been like as emotional as Gabe Davis driving me insane. This is just me going so far from one side to the other in this single season and then back and fourth on the value of this player in Dynasty, and this season is his entire career so far. It's Zach Sharbonay. Going into the NFL draft, Zach Sharbonay was my running back two ahead of Jamir Gibbs. I know that was spicy in some circles. I just thought the talent, the body, the size, the pass catching the pile, pushing the goal line, opportunities, big body back, big body back. If a team were to invest heavily in him, and he was projected to go in like the second round, if a team were to you know, invest heavily in him and create in him a workhorse, he would have been unbelievably great for fantasy football. That's why I loved him. And then he was drafted in the second round with great draft capital by the Seattle Seahawks. We know the story, and ken Walker is there and Pete Carroll playing his games with all his running backs and all this, so you know, that obviously dropped him down quite a bit. For me. After the draft, it was like, well, his opportunity isn't going to be there. You know, at best, he's a fifty to fifty player with ken Walker. At worst, he's just the backup. We've seen the Seattle Seahawks do this before. You know, they spent a first round draft pick on Rashad Penny back in the day, who was a talented, great player, and then they said, hey, Chris Carson, who was already on the team. You're just you're the dude, and this is not injury. Okay. I know we want to say Rashad Penny's career was completely and utterly derailed by injury. Sure, there's truth to that, but his rookie season, it wasn't injury. It wasn't that he was injured his rookie season, he was just flat out was the backup to Chris Carson, despite the first round draft capitol. And I believe that had those two players both stayed healthy and active for the Seahawks, it just that was what they wanted. They regardless of spending the first round pick. They liked Chris Carson, they liked what he presented their team, and they spent high draft capital on the backup running back. And so now as the season has gone and unfolded, I think about four or five weeks into the season, when it was The kN Walker Show and he was dominating and Charbonay was, you know, clearly and utterly the backup, it was like, well, I genuinely thought Charboney's career is over. Like for fantasy purposes, for fantasy purposes, He's never gonna you know, he's an insurance back where if ken Walker gets injured, now all of a sudden, you've got a fantasy asset. But until that happens, you do not get fantasy production out of this player, no matter how good he is and how much draft capital there was. So I you know, in week four or five, I was like, man, do you just trade him for anything you can get? Trade on the hope and the high of the draft capitol and the rookie pick that was spent on him. Now we've seen him over the last couple of weeks once he got back from his injury. He's playing the majority of snaps. He's playing almost all of the third down role, which Kyle, I know you're a huge advocate of this. The third down role in the NFL is not very important. It's really not a case in point. Zach Scharbeney has played all the third down role and it's resulted in Diddley's squat. The early down snap percentages still go to Kenneth Walker. First and second down, that's really where fantasy points are scored far more than third down. Yes, a reception is worth more, but players get receptions on first and second down too. It's not just third down. A lot of times third down is the third and one. It's a goal line type of play. So I don't know what to do with Zach Sharbonay. I don't even know my belief going forward on the fantasy value. Will he be relevant without an injury to Ken Walker? Right now? If I had to like put my put a dollar bet on it, I would say no, I don't think he's ever gonna be relevant unless Kenneth Walker gets injured, and that sucks for a guy that I genuinely think is extremely talented and should like should kin Walker get injured, Charbona is gonna be a top ten back. Yeah, I'm so confident of that.
Yeah. I thought a couple of weeks ago that he was a great bi Low candidate to be able to say, hey, you know what there's because he's, like you said, he's more than just give me ten touches, Like he has the upside of being a top five running back if Walker's out of the way. But I just didn't know what I was gonna get, and I didn't want to give it up because he's still seen as you know, he was a first round rookie pick this past year, you know, borderline, and I think that's still what you kind of have to give up. Like the manager that took him is willing to probably hold him. So would you rather have Zach Charbonay or a late first in twenty twenty four?
I think I'd rather have the first.
I think so too, And so I'm probably just holding because if you're that manager that's contending. Let's say, you know, you end up being the you know, tenth or eleventh pick or whatever. You're trading that pick in hopes that this guy helps you for this year, and there's zero guarantees apart from a Ninjuri that's happened. So yeah, I totally agree. Over the last three weeks, this is crazy. Sharbona has took all but one third down snap for the team, and like Jason mentioned, there's no Fantasy points that have mattered at all from him, So keep that in mind. It's a player that we still believe in talent wise, and he's been efficient when he's gotten some touches. But if Walker's gonna get all the first and second down, that's all that matters. I am going crazy with this player, and I blasted in our slack channel and I need some help because Lamar Jackson might be the most frustrating player to have at quarterback because you could get fifty points, you could also get eleven points, which is crazy that in any given week this team could put up thirty plus points, which is what they've done, and you have no idea if it's just gonna be three rushing touchdowns and you're done. So remember last year he started off on fire like he had a couple of quarterback ones. Since then, since Week four of last year, guys, he's scored twenty plus fantasy points and back to back games just twice. Like you're not getting back to back good performances at all, and in a with a quarterback that's expensive in dynasty in a super flex league, like twenty points is just a given, Like you need to get twenty points from you know, all these players that you're seeing as a QB one. And I looked at like, what's different this year? Lamar's completing seventy percent of his passes. That's the high of phy career, but the lowest eight out of his career. Like that's what's driving us crazy about Zay Flowers too, right, just these little dink and dunks. They don't matter. We brought this point up. I remember Jason bringing up too like there was a new story, saying Lamar wouldn't run as much this year. But basically, the offense, they're gonna scramble way more, and scrambles are way more valuable, and he's scrambling at the highest rate of his career. It's awesome, but they're not giving him design runs. So it's this weird thing where he's completing more passes but they're short. He's scrambling more but not overall running more, and then you get these weird outcomes.
So it's off just one thing, man, It's one thing and one thing alone. It's touchdowns. That's it. Because Lamar has played very good all year. He's got a consistency rating over the last seventeen games of a d he has been bad for Fantasy as far as helping you win on a consistent basis all those games. I mean, there might be one or two poorly played games in there, but those seventeen games he's been good. The team has been good. The team is scoring enough and doing well enough in the vast majority of them. It's just a matter of where do the touchdowns come from and right now they're so good at rushing touchdowns, and that it used to be the rushing touchdowns were Lamar. Now it's just it's gusp Us, it's Keaton Mitchell, it's I mean, Justice Hill has had multiple He's had a game with multiple rushing touchdowns. Like they're just really frustrating for fantasy. So what do you do with the guy? Where you go, well, I know he's good, I know Lamar's good. It's not a Lamar problem, but he isn't scoring consistent fantasy and and I believe the answer is you should trade super high on him. He's still Lamar Jackson. He's still literally the odds on favorite for MVP this year, or at least he was before this last week. I don't know if that changed with their loss, but you can get a lot for Lamar Jackson. Lamar Jackson is a name that has extreme recognition in fantasy circles. And if you haven't had Lamar, you don't realize the experience and the letdown and you're you're still riding high on that. What was that like twenty eighteen? When was his twenty nineteen? Twenty nineteen, nineteen year. That's a long time ago, man, So.
Let me ask this question, bets you can, because Lamar has been one of my favorite players this year. We were in Lamar in a lot of different format, especially best But like, I hate the ebbs and flows so much. I like, I hate that. I'm watching this game and I'm pointing it out to my wife and I'm saying, see this player right here, he could literally break the game, or he's gonna throw an interception, and of course he did like or fumble, Like, that's just Lamar. So would you rather have Lamar in a super flex or in Dynasty League or Justin Herbert plus a little something more?
Oh, that's interesting. It probably depends on what the plus is. But I mean, I'm biased. I'm a huge Justin Herbert guy, so I think I would take the Justin Herbert side if it's something somewhat meaningful. On the plus side, it.
Just feels like a smoother ride. And I'm not saying that's the right answer, I'm just saying emotionally, I'm showing you guys the fantasy points. I have a chart right here that is a literal roller coaster right there over the last two years, So.
His touchdown rate is wild. You mentioned that historic season when he had the nine percent touchdown rate. He's been like, you know, six point nine, four point two, five point two. I do think we're going to see some progression back to his average over the next several games. He's currently at three point six. That's going to be right now. It's supposed to be the lowest of his career, not including his rookie season when he didn't play a full year. So if that swings back, I think you'll feel a little better about Lamar. But like you said, Jason, they're just so good at running the football that I'm not sure. And this week on Thursday, they get a matchup against a Bengals team that can't stop anyone against the run.
So I don't know. I get it.
I get the frustration, but there are some signs that say maybe it won't be this way, you know, for the rest of the season or obviously moving forward.
My blood pressure is up, like I can tell, like since having this conversation talking him out, But I'll figure it out.
Well, what would you do, Kyle, before I move on? Would you take the Herbert plus side?
I jet La, that's what I want to do, because I just want to rid myself of feeling this every single week, Like at least like you can look at certain players. If Sam Howell bus you're like, I expect Sam Howell to bust, but with Lamar just expecting greatness and you don't get it as much as you want.
So it's unfortunate.
Yeah, all right, we're gonna take a quick break and then we'll jump into some trades. All right, we're gonna jump into some trades. We'll highlight a couple of different players that fit the trade four and the trade away. So let's do it.
Let's talk trades.
So I called this a trade of palooza, and I actually don't really know what a paloosa is.
Do you guys know? I'm on it.
It feels like a term that we're supposed to know, or like we'd say when something's big or an extravaganza. I don't know.
Well, Poloosa is a portion of the word lollapalooza, which is a late nineteenth century term to find out as an extraordinary or unusual thing, person, or event, an exceptional example or instance. Okay, there you go.
That's a fun word to be able to say I'm extending this idea of a trade show and we're making it a palooza.
An extraordinary event.
This is pretty extraordinary. So these are trade four candidates. We're gonna give each give three last year, I want to give you some examples. If you traded for James Connor like I did, Okay, I'm just throwing this out there. Traded for James Connor, he was the RB six from this point forward. It was one of the best trades I've ever made my life. Devin du Verney in a second for a hurt James.
Wow. Wow, that is a pretty darn good trade.
And then George Kittle. If you traded for Kittle, which I get, it's the up and down as well. He's definitely the roller coaster player with Brock Purty down the stretch. I didn't trade for him, but I had a friend that said he won me my championship because you got those Monster games with Party. So these obviously will all hit. These will be the exact players that people need in dynasty bets. Start us off.
Yeah, I am going I'm gonna cheat here and just say there's two options, because you can't create trade for Jack and Smith and Jigbo because he's so valuable in Dynasty, but you can trade for Tyler Lockett and or DK metcalf And really, I just want to buy into the Seattle passing game. We finally saw Geno get back on track last week, and yes it was against Washington, as everyone gets there. But the Seattle wide receivers have the second easiest schedule adjusted you know, fantasy points against schedule moving forward, and the easiest on our site looking at just the playoff weeks. They get San Francisco, Philly, and Tennessee in weeks fifteen, sixteen, seventeen, and a lot of these teams that they're gonna be playing, I think we're gonna see decent game environments with higher totals, lots of passing. They take on the Rams, the Niners twice, Dallas, like I said, the Eagles, and the Titans, who you have to throw on so on paper, it looks like Seattle's going to be throwing the ball more moving forward. They're already ninth in passworate over expectation. But the reason it has been so frustrating for guys like Metcalfs specifically and to some extent, Tyler Lockett is because Geno Smith's touchdown rate is down compared to what it was last year going back to his Jets stays, which I kind of laughed, reminded myself of like Geno Smith's career, but going back to his Jet Stays, he was a four point one percent touchdown rates type of guy last season in Seattle five point two. This year's all the way down at three point seven. So if we get the passing volume to stay the same or perhaps with these game environments increase and the touchdown rate comes up a little bit, you should see more production from the wide receivers as a whole. And the nice thing about it is you know where the ball is going with the Seattle passing attack, right they are fourth in the NFL. Seattle is in target rate to the wide receiver position, so they're behind the Rams, the Bengals, the Dolphins, and then it's Seattle. So the ball is going to these guys. I think you can get Lockett for a pretty reasonable cheap price. People know he's older, people know Jsn's there, and Metcalf is a guy that really he's like the poster boy for underperforming in Fantasy at wide receiver. He is the wide receiver seventeen and expected fantasy points this year, he's the wide receiver thirty seven overall. Currently, he doesn't need touchdowns, and I think they're coming in the back half of the year. So what are you guys' thoughts on the Seattle passing game.
I really really like this call for two kind of opposite reasons. If you're trading for Lockett, you need to be trading cheap because he's an old man where people are trying to get something in something for him, especially if he's on a team that's not headed towards the championship, like go kick the tires. Because I think this year he'll be great. I'll bet he's fine next year too, Metcalf. Metcalf is a long term, very good dynasty option. Metcalf. I believe the reason he's underperforming right now this year is simply that he's injured. He doesn't look the same to me. First of all, he looks too big. I was I was talking about this at the studio, like, I don't know what's going on, but he looks so big and lumbering for what he usually looks like. And obviously, I mean he missed a game with injury. He's been on the injury report every single week. I don't think he's at full strength. And he is a young stud who we know is a great dominant wide receiver in the NFL. So if he is struggling right now, yeah, that's the time to take advantage of, you know, of the player. You can make the argument, oh, j Sin's in town and you know he's the future, and Metcalf is underperforming. You know, it seemed like a year ago even being able to trade for DK Metcalf in dynasty would have been too difficult, cost way too much to be able to acquire. So I like both those calls.
I am putting in an offer right now in a dynasty league involving DK Metcalf and another player that I will be talking about in a second.
Is this is this the league I'm in with you? Cole?
Uh?
Sometimes I accept that you're in the league. Some days I don't so.
But I'm saying, you're talking about Donald Jr. Right now? Good bet?
I am all right.
I need to came back up real quick.
You need to bring up your player, all.
Right, I'll bring up my player. My player is Lions running back. No, not Jamiir Gibbs. It's Lions running back David Montgomery. That's the player I think Dynasty managers should be trading for. Dynasty running backs are hard to come by. They expire so quickly. They don't get second contracts so regularly. It's very, very difficult to think I've got multiple years from this running back unless they're a rookie. If they're on the rookie contract, like Jamier Gibbs, you draft them and you've got Kenneth Walker, Travis etn who you know, are very very young players who you think, Okay, I've got a good Dynasty asset. I drafted Breecee Hall last year. Outside of the super young guys, everybody seems like a worthless, expiring asset. And right now with Montgomery, I realized he had a big run this last week. But it's Jamiir Gibbs season. The fire has been stoked for Jamiir Gibbs. Everyone's excited about it. They're waiting for the takeover, and I don't think people are really excited in Dynasty the way they should be for David Montgomery. David Montgomery is an older back, but he just signed a brand new contract he is one hundred percent under contract this year, one hundred percent under contract next year, where they're not going to be able to get out of it. Technically they could get out of it before that third year, but the contract, when you look at it, it doesn't save him that much money to get out of it. It's a pretty good team friendly deal at that point three years from now, and he's not going to be as old as you think. Think that entire time. This is a team that is great at running the ball, wants to establish it has a great offensive line, a high scoring offense. I think you've got three solid years of a really important fantasy asset in David Montgomery, and people aren't valuing him that way because of Jamiir Gibbs. They can both be really good, they can both be super good for fantasy, but only one is an extremely high value target and the other is kind of like, yeah, but he's David Montgomery. So to me, I was able to trade for him in a keeper league this year. I did that because I believe what I'm saying, and I would kick the tires on what is the price in your dynasty leagues.
I think that it would cost you just because of what he's done this year. A first plus a first plus a young piece.
Okay, so we actually I forgot in a Champ Champ Champ Champ Champ league. I mean that's a couple of years from now. Right now, we're Champ Champ Champ, three time champion. We just Mike and I tried to trade for David Montgomery, and we were very very very close to a deal. In fact, had that team not won, had they lost, we basically had a deal together and it was our first round pick plus it was a younger wide receiver who I don't think will develop in anything, but could like. It's what he said is he wanted a first plus hope, and so that was kind of the deal we came up with. But now it looks like his team is headed towards the playoffs. I don't think he wants to move on, but yeah, that's about what it costs. And if you're a good team, which were we've got a good roster, we were happy to send our first round pick next year plus a little bit more for David Montgomery. Yeah.
Love, I think that's I mean, it makes sense. He fits his team's identity. They can both coexist we saw that what last week where both players were awesome for fantasy it can work. I will throw out a running back that is not nearly as expensive as the other two players, and you might only look at him as a one year rental, but I think there could be a little bit more. It's Jerome Ford, running back of the Cleveland Browns, his second year in the league. He was a fifth round draft pick. The last two weeks since he's returned, you know, he was kind of banged up, but he last two weeks sixty four percent of the snaps and he's seen thirty three percent of the team's targets and rush attempts. On our website, we call that our workhorse percentage. Anything above thirty is insane. So he's like the main guy. I know Kareem Hutt is getting some touches, but Jerome Ford has been a much better runner this year than people give him credit. And the rest of the season, Cleveland has one of the best schedules coming up. They're running the ball at the third highest rush rate, and I don't think it will cost you that much on the stretch run to get a player like Jerome Ford, which I think he's a solid RB two rest of season. He's going to give you some weeks where he's top fifteen, top twelve. I think he's he's great, and I think it'll cost you. I don't know a late second.
Yeah, I don't think it'll cost much. It depends on whether or not the team that has him is whether they need him or not. Right. I like the idea of taking on Jerome Ford and the fact that the second surgery is coming up for Chubb. You know, there was some positive news right after the you know, originally the Chub injury was like horrific, like oh my gosh, this is look away, and then it was like, oh, it's pretty positive. It's not multi ligament, so then everything went away. But then it was like no, no, no. They got in there and they were like, yeah, it is messed up. Disney's messed up. We're gonna have to do another one. So there's no guarantee that Chubb comes back to his former self.
Ever, Yeah, yeah, that is unfortunate as far as the Chubb thing goes. The other thing working in Drome Ford's favor. If you're thinking about not just this year, but like, could I get a guy that potentially isn't RB two next year? Is that when you look at their roster currently at the the players that are signed. They've got Nick Chubb for one more year, but of course we already talked about the injury. Then it is drum Ford and Pierre Strong and that's it. So if they continue to not have the money to spend up on a running back, which thanks to Shaun Watson they don't and or can't afford to spend high ish draft capital on a guy, you could see a scenario where maybe Chubb comes back as like a you know, a couple touches a game sort of guy, but like drum Ford is the lead back that's in the range of outcomes for sure. So I like that as a guy that right now people are like, he's fine, like doesn't scream upside, he's not this you know, sexy name, but like he could be an RB two for your next year as well. So you're kind of getting a double dip here, which I really like.
Do you feel like you could trade a young wide receiver that's kind of tantalizing that could not pan out, like Marvin Mims, which hasn't done a time. But I think most people are excited of what he could be in the potential. Would you trade Marvin Mims for a drum Ford?
I would not.
I don't think I would. I would. I would still hold out for Marvin Mims. Play the long game.
Okay, well, I'm trying to find the wide receiver to mix in. That's like, okay, they've done enough. Like I tried with Khalil Shakir. That wasn't enough. There's somewhere between those two that I that I think could work. So he's just the name of that Adams. Imagine having him last, Imagine having him on your roster though.
Could be me.
I just got an offer from somebody that had this package and they said, hey, what if I put Jameson Williams in. I go no, take him out. I will feel way better.
No, that makes it worse.
It twenty times worse. All right, let's go through some trade away candidates. This is tough because we're not saying this player is going to stink, or not saying this player is worthless or we'll have no value. Part of this is like the guessing game of are you getting out at the right time? So I look back at last year, DeAndre Hopkins was still a cardinal and he was still really good. His target share was really good. But if you could squeeze out some elite value before then you are probably doing great because the sun is kind of set on DeAndre Hopkins and his dynasty value. Damian Pierce, we've talked about him last couple weeks. If you could could have sold then and said, hey, I don't think he's the guy, or Dalvin Cook was a player last year that if you sold you felt great. I am left holding the bag in the league because I needed him at the time and now it's just sitting on my roster. So's it's like trading Way.
It's crazy how quick those things can those things, those running backs can just disappear. Dalvin Cook was great last year. He was really good for Fantasy so important, huge breakaway runs, paid a lot of money. Even this year, poof gone vanished. He's like you just drop him. I mean don't really, but like you could do.
You guys know what Dalvin Cook finished in half point leagues last year's.
Got to be top ten at least.
He was okaben Wow did it feel like that though?
Uh No, I mean I think there was a lot of disappointment with Dalvin Cook, but he had he had some big plays last year. I mean last year. How many games did he play? Did he play the whole season?
He technically played the whole season, but it was a rough ride.
Yeah.
Anyway, those are just examples of players that can just evaporate. So you want to be on the right side. So part of this is a guessing game. Bets hit us with one first.
Yeah, this one is kind of wild because when you look back to the start of the season where he was as far as the training camp hype and the Week one performance, you thought, oh my gosh, like Calvin Ridley is still Calvin Ridley. But turns out he is not Calvin Ridley any longer. And there's some concerning underlying metrics that say he's not the same player he used to be, which no one was expecting that, but I think we were at hoping he'd be a wide receiver two at worst, a flex play every week. He's almost twenty nine years old, he's about to be a free agent, and now right now among the pass catchers, he's third and targets per game, and that's been without Zay Jones in the lineup. But I know that right now there's some legal stuff going on with a Jones, But if Zay Jones comes back from that and or injury, it adds another piece to this offense that you're concerned about the target volume for Calvin Ridley, and when you look at the efficiency stuff, his yards for outrun is not great. He's about middle of the pack among wide receivers that are qualified. He's only being targeted on nineteen percent of his routes. He's not getting open according to ESPN's a open score, which is kind of this player tracking metric. But like when you think about Calvin Ridley, that was his thing was he was an elite route runner who could get open and create separation. He is not doing that anymore, and now he is the tail end of his career. So I think it's okay to be out and get out before it's too late. And I feel like when we look at this offseason, a lot of the talk around Calvin Ridley is going to be what happens over the next four or five six weeks here to close out the year and then where he goes in free agency and whether or not he goes back to Jacksonville. But I just think the metrics are kind of telling us he's not the player he was and he may never be anything close to it again. And so I'm willing to get out, even if I take a cheaper, you know, trade, to get out from underneath Covin Ridley before it's too late.
The question is one of the questions that we got was so if I were to sell him or should I wait, you're saying I should sell him right now and get whatever I can, like a like an early second.
I would one hundred percent try to get an early second. Actually put that out on Twitter today to see what the you know sentiment was among people. About ten percent of folks said a late first, about thirty percent said early second, and about sixty percent of people said a mid second. So early to mid second seems like the market for right now for Covin Ridley. I think that's totally fair.
Jason, do you feel about the same.
Yeah, No, I think it's a great name to try right away. Sometimes when players haven't played in a while or they didn't have much run, they can feel younger than they are. Calvin Ridley's not a super young man. We don't know what his contract situation is going forward. This could be a complete nothing the rest of his NFL career for fantasy, So getting something for him, especially if it's a rookie pick. If you can get a rookie pick a second rounder, then you've got hope for the future. I don't think there is much of that, if any, with Calvin Ridley.
And you don't want to go back and listen to our episode after week one, where I remember like he was the big conversation piece that we talked about, like his range of outcomes, and at the time it felt like, Okay, well we need to see this a little bit longer. But it felt like, Okay, Wow, you have a locked in receiver right now for your team that you didn't expect to be top fifteen rest of the season. That's clearly not the case. And one of the things Bets you brought up is these advanced metro that I've seen people post is that he's just getting bullied. Like he's not a big receiver, he's not very thick, he's kind of wiry, and he's just been getting bullied at the line of scrimmage, where you know, if you're one of those smaller receivers, you can't just get open if people are pressing you. So it's just it's a different system, it's a different team, it's a different role, and Christian Kirk seems to be the one. Let's take one more break and then we'll be right back. All right, we're back, and Jason's gonna hit us with maybe the player people are most mad at in Fantasy right now.
Yeah, I would say in some circles, yeah, you've got to be disappointed with the performance of Tony Pollard. Tony Pollard is someone that has majorly, majorly disappointed for Fantasy. However, if you have not been the Tony Pollard manager, I don't think you realize how bad it's been. You really really don't. Because he got off to a hot start at the beginning of the year. The Cowboys are good. Tony Pollard seems like a young, explosive running back that you know, we've been waiting for the opportunity to come. He still carries a lot of value to people who have not had Tony Pollard. This is not you know, a lot of times when someone is performing the way he's performing right now, it's hard to trade him. You just can't. But I'm telling you in your leagues, Tony Pollard's name is a valued, desired, wanted, young athletic stud running back, But I don't know to ask him. Yo. I think this is let me ask you guys a question, because Tony Pollard is now getting his opportunity and he feels like this real young, exciting back. Would it surprise you to know that Tony Pollard is older than David Montgomery.
Yes, he's been around for a while, right.
I mean there was a reason he's on a franchise tag. It's because he was out of contract this you know, this is his fifth season. It feels to some like, oh he he this is second or third year, because you know he was behind Zeke and explosively just wanted the opportunity. But that's that's not the situation. He doesn't have a contract for next year. We don't know who what team he's playing for. If he keeps playing like this this year, is he gonna get a good opportunity for another team next year? No? That's where it's like, I think in a lot of leagues, you could trade Tony Pollard straight up for David Montgomery easily. I think plenty of leagues would would take that. David Montgomery is literally younger, has a better team, is successful for fantasy, has a contract for the next two years. So like, when I look at these two players comparatively, they shouldn't be valued near the same, but I think they're valued. I think Tony Pollard has more value to some people in a lot of leagues than David Montgomery does because of the excitement that has not come to fruition and there are I mean, look, when you trade away Tony Pollard, you could say, they're playing Carolina Panthers this week, that is a great matchup. They're playing the Washington Manderson next week. That's another really good matchup. The Seattle Seahawks another good matchup. Like, you could feel really bad if Pollard comes out has three good games after you trade him. That is, but that's also what can help you get a lot for him to a team that needs a running back. But at the end of the year, I don't know that he gets a good contract anywhere. He's gonna be a twenty seven year old running back that even if he has a good three weeks with a good matchup, he disappointed his current NFL franchise. So I believe now is the time that you want to capitalize and get something for Pollard.
I agree. Like before the season he was seen as a top ten dynasty running backs, so in startup drafts, people were excited to take him second, third, whatever round that you're but it's it's gone. Efficiency is not there right now, and you know it's part of it. You can say it's unlucky. But Jason mentioned, when you're at this age turning twenty seven next year, you'll turn twenty seven April thirtieth. The list of contracts of running backs at this age, like the guaranteed money has not been there, you know, for years, and then on top of that it hasn't worked out. Let me give you some names, guys, Doug Martin, Chris Ivory, Latavius Murray, Dion Lewis, Carlos Hyde, Jamal Williams. I mean, it's like, these are the guys that are getting contracts, multi year contracts at this age, and they were done with that year or the year after, So could he work somewhere next year? That's just a giant gamble. And during your discussion, guys, I realize that I had a trade in front of me last week that involved I totally forgot it was Tony Pollard and Calvin Ridley, We're gonna come my way, and I was gonna have to give up a first a second and Johan Dotson and I said no because I needed running back help. But I just said, I just don't think the price is right. So I guess I dodged a bullet, I hope. So yeah, yeah, Tony.
Tony Pollard is so interesting because like the explosiveness was his calling card, and I don't know if he's just like it's just what happens when they hit the age cliff and kind of fall off when he's not that old. But like it's it's not just the fact that Dak's thorrymore, he's just efficiency's terrible. So I'm worried about Tony Pollard moving forward.
All Right, I've got one more name I want to give for a trade away, and Jason, feel free to rebuke me if you think you know I'm a little over the top, but it is Arizona Cardinals Marque's Hollywood Brown that I just so I have him in a league and I'm actively shopping him. So Jason, if you want him, you can have him, because you have Kyler. But Kyler's back, and I think the sentiment is sweet. This is the duo, they've known each other since college. Hollywood's gonna be locked in. Okay, and last week was not great whatever, but before that you looked at their splits together and you're like, sweet. Hollywood averaged ten targets per game with Kyler since he's come to Arizona. That was only eight games, so it's not a huge sample size. But we need to remember this is a different team. It is a different offensive coordinator than the last year, it's a different system, they have a different setup. And my biggest argument for Hollywood is I think he's out of place in twenty twenty three. I think he's not built for today's NFL, where every single team is running zone coverage at least sixty percent of the time, and twenty three out of thirty two teams are running at seventy percent of the time. So really, when I look at splits a lot of times, if we're grinding the tape, is somebody good against zone? That's all that matters to me. When somebody's really good against man coverage, it actually scares me a little bit because teams rarely run this and this year, Hollywood and the year before has been very bad against zone coverage. In fact, he is very far behind Trey McBride and Michael Wilson in terms of yards per out run, targets per out run. He's way behind Trey McBride. When it comes to zone his expected fantasy points, he's way behind. And all of his touchdowns this year have come against man coverage. Now, that can work, but I think the type of player you have with Hollywood. Teams are now running a bunch of two high safeties where they're saying, hey, you're not going to beat us deep. I think Patrick Mahomes kind of changed that for the league. And so Hollywood scares me because one, he's a free agent, right, Jason Like, he's gonna be a free agent. So we assume. We assume that he's going to re sign because Kyler is his boy, that's not a foregone conclusion. But we also don't know and what is he because I've used him in fantasy. The target totals have been there, their production hasn't. The yardage totals have not, And so I'm looking at a player that I just keep waiting and hoping that I'm gonna get top fifteen, top twenty type numbers, and it's just never been the case. In fact, he's never finished inside the top twenty in his career. So I think he's okay to trade away.
Yeah. I so the reason you're like saying, rebuke me is because you know, I believe in Hollywood's talent. I also believe that he's going to be fantastic rest of this season for the Cardinals with Kyler in this new system with the new head coach. I mean you you know you talk about Okay, it's you know, we haven't seen Kyler with Hollywood in this system with this coach, but we have seen Hollywood in this system with this coach without Kyler. And prior to Kyler, you've got games with targets of ten, ten, ten, eleven, nine, eight, like he's had a primary r this offense. They just haven't been coming from Kyler. And yeah, the first game with Kyler only four targets, But like you said, in the eight games with Kyler prior to that, an average of ten targets. So they're coming. He's the clear most talented receiver on the roster. So I'm not worried about that I think rest of season Hollywood is very good. So I'm fine trading for Hollywood, but you do have to have an expectation of it could go poorly for him this offseason. I do. We're in Arizona. I do not think it is a foregone conclusion that Hollywood will resign with the Cardinals at all. So, for instance, I was looking up wide receiver free agents this coming year. Mike Evans will be one. I think he'll resign with Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Michael Pittman will be one. I definitely think he will be resigned by the Colts. And then it's a bunch of jack squat with the exception of two players. There's t Higgins, who will not resign with the Cincinnati Bengals. He'll be a free agent, he'll go get his money. And there's Hollywood Brown, who is You know, teams are thirsty for wide receivers, so we don't know where Hollywood's gonna go next year. But he's not gonna be the one that is. A team is not going to sign him to a deal to be their number one wide receiver if he stays in Arizona. There is a really good chance that Marvin Harrison Junior is going to go to the Arizona Cardinals next year, and therefore Hollywood will be the number two. Now, we've seen plenty of number twos be successful for fantasy. You could argue maybe that's a better role for Hollywood, being more of the Devonte Smith, T Higgins Jalen Wattle type really valuable for fantasy, but not the number one on their team. But the rest of this season, I think Hollywood will be very very good. Yeah.
I was gonna say, I'm gonna push back a little, Kyle because I I'm on the side of where Jason stands were I see the argument for the offseason and and the things that Jason just mentioned, But for this year, I mean, Kyler is going to continue to get better as he gets more acclimated to the system in real life NFL games, and Hollywood's target share has been awesome this year. He's among the league leaders though in uncatchable target rate, or I should say like his his targets haven't been catchable but from Josh Dobbs. So if you see that, I would.
Like you to stop, okay, because I think I'm gonna try to trade for Kyler here after the show from Kyle, So let's you know, I mean those started to sound.
Really yeah, yeah, yeah, no, Yeah, Hollywood's gonna be terrible. That's what I was going to say.
I mean, I guess for the for the listeners, you can keep going with your spiel.
But just got Josh Dobbs. The Josh Dobbs play in Arizona. Wow, very fun from a passing standpoint, was not great. Now in Minnesota he's the man, which has been so fun for fantasy, but his actual quarterback play that he has had this year speaking of Hollywood, has not been good. And so if Kyler continues to play better and better and better a year goes on, I just think if that volume is there, you'll see better box score production from from Hollywood. So I'm still in if you need a piece to trade for for this year, But I agree with the offseason concerns.
Would you give up a first, Jason?
Would I give up a first for Hollywood? Oh? That's really really tough. I mean obviously in the league that we are in, Uh, that's the twelfth pick.
Yeah, I would squeeze more out of you.
And see, I don't know if I I don't know.
If I would for the Stack.
Well, we got Joe Burrows, so I don't even know that Kyler is our is our weekly starter for the quote unquote Stack twenty six years old. I mean that's right around what the value is. Like a late first is probably about what the what it's going to cost you, you might I I think when it comes to Hollywood, picks won't do as well as players, like when when you're when you're trying to like, I don't really want to give up a pick for a wide receiver about to change teams where we don't know where he's going to go, But there might be players that make sense for both rosters, or like a second plus a player that you know, like a second and a downgrade at wide receiver going across to Hollywood. You know, you get a pick, a future promise, and a Hollywood fill in, you know, as a like a flex level option. That seems to me like how you would try to trade for Hollywood.
Yeah. Is there a possibility that if he resigns, he's like the third option on this team next year?
Train McBride, baby, is that what you're saying?
Oh, I'm like, so I did the deep dive just to say, like Trey McBride is being targeted on thirty percent of his routes in zone coverage, which I guess said seventy percent of the time. That's what you're getting. So there's a reason that this team is funneling targets there, and the NFL is funneling targets to these kind of players, They're not funneling them in the most efficient ways to downfield threats. Because I'm telling you, I'm I am a Hollywood Brown manager, and you can look at target totals all day, expected fantasy points all day, real fantasy points. It is not pretty right now. Yeah, and it could change. But anyway, Yeah, Trey McBride, you have trade.
McBride's got his hand I do in the dirt.
Uh yeah, we we, Mike and I drafted Trey McBride because we could not trade Travis Kelcey. This is when when McBride was coming out. We couldn't get enough for Kelse. We were trying to get at the time, Kyle Pitts, We're trying to get Mark Andrews, trying to trade like Kelsey plus stuff for them. Couldn't get it. So we were like, we have to find our long term tight end placement. All the young tight ends. No one is willing to give him up. And so we took Trey McBride so early. We took him at the twelve spot in the first round in that rookie draft, and we regretted it ever since. And now we're like, wait a minute, Wait a minute, baby, do we have our Kelsey replacement of the future.
I'm hopeful he's super fun bets and I basically will play him every single week in DFS from here on out. I feel, oh yeah, every single week.
He's been awesome.
All right, let's hit a couple of listener questions mail bag. All right, first question I have here and we'll answer these pretty quickly on our trade of palooza. But is this the apex of Sam Howell's dynasty value? This one's from Jay Chillin. What do you guys think?
Probably? I think it probably is that right now, he's the quarterback. Three on the season, he's top ten in points per game. The team is saying all of the right things. They're talking about how he's the future. You know, he's their their franchise quarterback, and that's all well and good, But the team isn't that great and if he doesn't win games, he will get replaced. The coach, the staff will get replaced. He doesn't have the draft capital to be bad for multiple years, so I think that there are people who might believe that he is the future and they would be able to, you know, pay a little bit more. Sam Howe to me, is going to get this year and next year. He'll play both seasons, and he'll be a streaming option both seasons. He's been on a heater right now, like four to the last five weeks top ten. I don't think that that is going to be very sticky. I see him more as like a fifty percent of games. Being a top twelve quarterback, which is which has a place, is an important fantasy. Everybody in the world should know how much I love Sam Howell, how much I believe in him, but I also like, I think he's a legit quarterback. It could be good long term, but I know what happens to quarterbacks who to any position that does not have draft capital. They get replaced. They always do.
Yeah, I think if you have him, be thankful, if he's your backup or in a super flex league, I would not try to trade for him. The stat we always bring up is almost a third of the league changes over their starting quarterback year to year, So not a guarantee for next year of the year beyond, but just be happy. I think he's one of those players that this might be the apex and you just write it out. Next one trade question here, Send Nico Collins in a late first and second for aman Ra Betts. What do you think about that value?
I would definitely try to get aman Ra in this deal. I think Nico Collins has had a very nice year, nice little breakout here. But anytime you can get a top ten dnasty wide receiver for an unknown rookie pick and a player who probably will settle in as like a fringe wide receiver two slash three in fantasy for the next couple of years, I'm doing that every day.
Yeah.
I Collins was almost a name that I brought up as a trade away, and I feel like I couldn't with the way that Stroud's playing. But Collins has had three good games this year. He's had maybe five good games in his entire career. So he's a player that, like next year, he'll be in a contract year. I don't feel like he's like a must like Dynasty cornerstone piece. He's fine, but I feel like he's more flex value than a wide receiver.
Two.
Moving forward, next one from the real Jeff, what do I do with Cooper Cup right now?
You hope Matthew Stafford is healthy?
Yeah, I mean that's what you do. You hold on, You.
Pray that Carson Wentz doesn't have to play football.
Yeah, hopefully you're a championship caliber team and what you do is you hope that he can and take you to a championship. I mean, if Stafford is healthy, Cooper Cup could be great the rest of the season, could be a league winner. You're not gonna get enough for him trading him away right now, with his injuries, with his injury to Matthew Stafford, with the performance he's had with Pooka, So you just have to hold and play him. I think if you are a rebuilding team and you want to, you know, get something out of him, then you go look at your best teams in the league, and you know, you try to get as much as you can for him to give someone a you know, championship help.
This is a question we've gotten before, but I think it's worth repeating at this time of the year from Nico Nico on discord. Is there a way trade calculators and trade value charts can be a valuable resource? And I'll throw this in first, Trade value and calculators assume that the value they'ressigning a player is correct when we know, you know, if you would have signed a value for Tony Pollard before the year, you would have looked at that and say, oh, well, Tony Poller, is really you know, X number valuable? And it's just assuming a lot that we know a lot when we know over time things changed. I think it's valuable if it's the fourth or fifth thing you're using in a conversation as kind of like a you know, you're checking your work kind of thing. But we personally don't. I never see us talk about them or see them in or slack.
I would. I can't imagine trusting any kind of trade calculator just impossible. The way that those things are updated, the lagging values. It's the only way that it's valuable is if you can use it to prove to someone else what a good deal they're getting, because the values say it's a good deal. I would hope that everybody making trades listening to this show, having fun with Dynasty, that they have their own values on players that they go, this is what I think of this player. You don't need to trust a number behind the scenes that someone else is assigning to someone. You know. They I've just I've never been a huge fan of them, So I don't know. Maybe maybe I'm wrong. Maybe there's great trade calculators out there, but I've just seen I've seen the wackiest things from those trade calculators.
I think they're the worst. Just they're the worst because you will have people in your league who are are just you know, they're only going to make a trade if the calculator says they are getting the right side of the deal, which is so dumb, right, It prevents trading. It prevents your lead from being active sometimes. So I think they're terrible for Dynasty. I do not use them, and I think that people that rely too much on them you might be missing out on some good deals that come your way if you're too stuck to what the computer says.
All right, last question here from Eucalyptus Richard on Twitter. If you have Garrett Wilson and Drake London and you want to tear up why receiver because you want to win right now? Which wide receiver would you trade for? And what would the deal look like? So I took this question as if I had those two players, it feels like almost a lost season, like where you're gonna get a lot of targets. Garrett Wilson's gonna average like twelve targets a game, but it doesn't feel like you're getting over the hump. So would you trade Garrett Wilson for another player that's in a similar tier but it's a little bit older, Like that's that's the the dance that you're doing right now. So like, would you trade Garrett Wilson for Tyreek?
Oh? Yeah, for sure, I would for sure. Yeah, what about it in Dynasty? I would If I could trade Garrett Wilson and receive Tyreek Hill, I would do that in a heartbeat.
I think a lot of people, and I've seen this in our discord, are afraid because they look at the younger player and they go, I'm supposed to like the younger player more. But if you're in win now, you might be waiting forever. Like we don't know if Garrett Wilson's ever going to have a quarterback or Drake Definitely Drake London. That dude will never get a quarterback if he's in Atlanta Falcon. So I think it's fine, like throughout the youth and ask yourself, can I win this year and win next year? That's how I took this question.
Yeah, that means yeah, and I agree. I think the interesting name here because to me, Tyreek Hill is a world beater. He is so unbelievably dominant. He should have this season and two more years left, I believe on his contract than he's talked about he's gonna retire. I think he'll be great next year. I think he'll be great the year after that, and I think he's gonna walk away and I'll take three years of greatness. He's not good. He's not being okay for fantasy like he is. He's breaking fantasy for a lot of fantasy managers. So yeah, I would take that. But the name that I'm less confident in, there's a lot more tumult going on within the franchise. Obviously he's still great, But would you trade away Garrett Wilson for Stefan Diggs.
I was about to bring him up as a Stefan Diggs manager. And if I'm in win Now, then I'm just gonna ride it out Digs. But I think I think I would. I think that makes sense when you think you adding the risk the age. Also, if Diggs just doesn't if Diggs just said tomorrow, I don't want to play football, I think we factored that in a little bit. BET's how do you feel.
That one's scary? I think I can see the argument because Diggs has been awesome for ever since he got the Buffalo, He's been elite for fantasy. I think I still eat in the Garrett Wilson's side, even factoring in that Diggs is probably the better win Now piece. But just if if that happens and next year Diggs is not part of Buffalo or which just whatever is happening, and Garrett Wilson ascends to be this just incredible asset in Dynasty, I would I wouldn't sleep at night, so I would hold Garret Wilson.
Yeah, me too. For the record, I'm on the Garrett Wilson side there.
All right, That's gonna do it for this episode of the Dynasty podcast next week, Just a little tease a pro teas. Here we have a very very special episode, a Dynasty Film Festival episode which I'm pretty excited about it. Go to join foot dot com if you want to be a part of us, and we'll see you again next week.
Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Footballers Dynasty Podcast. If you want to take your Dynasty skills to the next level, check out the Fantasyfootballers dot Com