The lawyers representing President Cyril Ramaphosa in his challenge of the private prosecution against him by former President Jacob Zuma have argued that his office will suffer undue interference should he be hauled before a criminal court. Ramaphosa is asking the full bench in the Johannesburg High Court to declare the summons issued by Zuma as unlawful, unconstitutional and invalid. Zuma is accusing his successor of being an alleged accomplice in the alleged leak of his health records by state prosecutor, Advocate Billy Downer. Advocate Ngwako Maenetjie says the legal bid by the former head of state will have an impact on the confidence entrusted to the office of the President...

Duncan McLeod says ICASA’s market inquiry could test whether consumers are getting fair value for their mobile data and broadband prices.
08:42

Acting National Police Commissioner Dimpane orders probe into injured SAPS K9 dog
01:55

Biko family welcomes temporary inquest halt
08:56