Hugh Hewitt speaks with, Texas Congressman, Dan Crenshaw member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee on Gwen Berry and his response to CRT attacks.

<a href="https://hughhewitt.com/">Hugh Hewitt </a>speaks with, Texas Congressman, <a href="https://crenshaw.house.gov/">Dan Crenshaw</a> member of the <a href="https://energycommerce.house.gov/">House Energy and Commerce Committee</a> on Gwen Berry and his response to CRT attacks.

The Townhall Review is a one-stop-shop for relevant news and intelligent analysis from the leading talk show hosts in the nation: Hugh Hewitt, Dennis Prager, Mike Gallagher,Sebastian Gorka, and Charlie Kirk.

The Townhall Review is a one-stop-shop for relevant news and intelligent analysis from the leading talk show hosts in the nation: <a href="http://www.hughhewitt.com" data-slimstat="5">Hugh Hewitt</a>, <a href="http://dennisprager.com" data-slimstat="5">Dennis Prager</a>, <a href="https://www.mikeonline.com" data-slimstat="5">Mike Gallagher,</a>  <a href="https://sebgorka.com" data-slimstat="5">Sebastian Gorka</a>, and <a href="https://989theanswer.com/radioshow/8875" data-slimstat="5">Charlie Kirk</a>.

Townhall Review | Conservative Commentary On Today's News

Townhall Review is today’s top conservative weekend radio show. Townhall Review brings together political commentary and analysis from leading conservative talk-radio hosts. You’ll enjoy the fast-paced recap of the week’s political events Townhall Review provides. You can rely on the show to provide the “who said what” in U.S. politics, global news and breaking news. Townhall Review honors your conservative principles and enables you to participate in the conversation on issues shaping our nation.

Townhall Review | Full Interviews & Monologues

Home

Their Version of Patriotism is Tearing Down America: Hugh Hewitt with Congressman Dan Crenshaw

With all the convulsions at our campuses on behalf of Hamas—an officially designated terrorist organization—we need to ask: What these students are being taught?  The protestors and rioters, after all, are marching and rioting against one of the most classically liberal entities in the world—Israel—and on behalf of a society of the medieval—radical Islam that kills LGBTQ identifiers, bans abortion and religious pluralism and oppresses women. They are marching on behalf of a government that is perhaps the least enlightened in the history of the world.

Meanwhile, the administration, like most colleges, to borrow from the political philosopher Leo Strauss, are listening and paying tribute to the least wise and least moderate part of this nation while it is in its least wise and least moderate mood, and at the same time praising wisdom and moderation.

Will those supporting Hamas today look back and someday ask “What was I thinking?” as those who supported Germany in the 1930s did?  Or the Soviets in the 40s and 50s?  Let us hope—and pray.  The stakes are that high.

With all the convulsions at our campuses on behalf of Hamas—an officially designated terrorist organization—we need to ask: What these students are being taught?  The protestors and rioters, after all, are marching and rioting against one of the most classically liberal entities in the world—Israel—and on behalf of a society of the medieval—radical Islam that kills LGBTQ identifiers, bans abortion and religious pluralism and oppresses women. They are marching on behalf of a government that is perhaps the least enlightened in the history of the world.   Meanwhile, the administration, like most colleges, to borrow from the political philosopher Leo Strauss, are listening and paying tribute to the least wise and least moderate part of this nation while it is in its least wise and least moderate mood, and at the same time praising wisdom and moderation.   Will those supporting Hamas today look back and someday ask “What was I thinking?” as those who supported Germany in the 1930s did?  Or the Soviets in the 40s and 50s?  Let us hope—and pray.  The stakes are that high.

Seth Leibsohn: What Are Our Students Being Taught?

In this episode, Charlie Kirk  Dr. Keith Rose, an Intel expert with insights into border issues and international activities. Dr. Rose discusses a coordinated effort between the US and Mexican immigration services to facilitate the movement of migrants into the US, hinting at potential voter registration strategies and financial motives behind these actions.

👉Follow Charlie on X

In this episode, <a href="https://thecharliekirkshow.com/">Charlie Kirk</a>  Dr. Keith Rose, an Intel expert with insights into border issues and international activities. Dr. Rose discusses a coordinated effort between the US and Mexican immigration services to facilitate the movement of migrants into the US, hinting at potential voter registration strategies and financial motives behind these actions.
<a href="https://twitter.com/charliekirk11">👉Follow Charlie on X</a>

Migrant Movements and Voter Strategies: Charlie Kirk with Dr. Keith Rose

Former President Donald Trump recently released a video statement putting forward his position on abortion.

He said, and I quote, “My view is now we have abortion where everybody wanted it from a legal standpoint, the states will determine by vote or legislation or perhaps both, and whatever they decide must be the law of the land.”

He went on to say that as a presidential candidate, he was not calling for any kind of national legislation to limit abortion access.

Now, I want to be clear: Former President Trump’s position on abortion is light years better than the position of the current President of the United States, Joe Biden.

Still, I am frustrated with the former president. 

I think it would have been far more intellectually and politically honest to say, “We’re not going to have a choice over the fact that someone’s going to propose nationwide legislation related to abortion. I want to be very clear that if there’s going to be nationwide legislation, I want it to be pro-life legislation.” 

Let’s take our stand there. 

Former President Donald Trump recently released a video statement putting forward his position on abortion.
He said, and I quote, “My view is now we have abortion where everybody wanted it from a legal standpoint, the states will determine by vote or legislation or perhaps both, and whatever they decide must be the law of the land.”
He went on to say that as a presidential candidate, he was not calling for any kind of national legislation to limit abortion access.
Now, I want to be clear: Former President Trump’s position on abortion is light years better than the position of the current President of the United States, Joe Biden.
Still, I am frustrated with the former president. 
I think it would have been far more intellectually and politically honest to say, “We’re not going to have a choice over the fact that someone’s going to propose nationwide legislation related to abortion. I want to be very clear that if there’s going to be nationwide legislation, I want it to be pro-life legislation.” 
Let’s take our stand there.

Their Version of Patriotism is Tearing Down America: Hugh Hewitt with Congressman Dan Crenshaw

In 1 playlist(s)

Townhall Review | Conservative Commentary On Today's News

Social links

Follow podcast

Recent clips