EFF lawyers have argued that the reasons advanced for NOT adopting the Section 89 independent panel report on the Phala Phala matter, are not able to be judged by a court. Advocate Kameel Premid says the ANC did not put forward an important basis to vote against the panel report. The Constitutional Court was hearing the red berets application against the National Assembly Speaker over the report. The report found that there was a prima facie case for which the President had to answer. Meanwhile, Legal counsel for the National Assembly and the Speaker has argued that the relief sought by the EFF, if granted, would be a breach of the separation of powers principle. Ernest Ntimbane sp[oke to Legal Expert, Gezani Maluleke

<p>EFF lawyers have argued that the reasons advanced for NOT adopting the Section 89 independent panel report on the Phala Phala matter, are not able to be judged by a court. Advocate Kameel Premid says the ANC did not put forward an important basis to vote against the panel report. The Constitutional Court was hearing the red berets application against the National Assembly Speaker over the report. The report found that there was a prima facie case for which the President had to answer. Meanwhile, Legal counsel for the National Assembly and the Speaker has argued that the relief sought by the EFF, if granted, would be a breach of the separation of powers principle. Ernest Ntimbane sp[oke to Legal Expert, Gezani Maluleke</p>

Munghana Lonene FM News and Current Affairs. Brought to you by SABC News.

<p>Munghana Lonene FM News and Current Affairs. Brought to you by SABC News.</p>