A Politico piece called Vice President Kamala Harris' preference for wired headphones over Bluetooth “paranoia.” But why let a little things like facts get in the way of an unfair media attack?
Well Actually, Kamala Is Right. Bluetooth Is a Risk: https://www.thedailybeast.com/well-actually-vice-president-kamala-harris-is-right-bluetooth-is-a-risk
Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com
There Are No Girls on the Internet. As a production of My Heart Radio and Unboss Creative. I'm Bridget Todd, and this is There Are No Girls on the Internet. I talk a lot about disinformation and media manipulation on this show. Sometimes it's social media boats being driven by foreign bad actors, But what do you do in the media manipulation isn't coming from overseas bad actors, but instead from a mainstream, widely read media outlet. I've been monitoring the increasing attacks on Vice President Kamala Harris since she became Vice president. Now, I already knew that she was going to face racist, sexist attacks because she's a black woman in a visible position, and that's just kind of what happens. And it might be kind of hard to see if you're not primed to see massage noir the combination of racism and sexism that we face as black women. But just look at some of the recent media narratives out there about Vice President Harris. They're all really racially coded and gendered. Recent stories painted out to be a pushing, domineering black woman or uppity, which is basically just a racist framing for black women who don't know their plays or acting above their station. A recent story about Harris's senior aide stepping down was framed as disarray in Harris's office. Or take this recent Fox News headline, Kamala Harris reportedly spends over five hundred dollars on cookware and a Parisian shop amid us economic uncertainty? How is Harris spending her own money on fancy pans even a news story? And we're not just seeing this from hyperpartisan outlets like Fox News. Last night, Politico published one of the most ridiculous pieces I have ever seen, and that is really saying something. The piece, called Kamala Harris is a Bluetooth phobic, is about how Vice President Harris uses wired headphones instead of the wireless Bluetooth kind, and the article's framing like basically calls her a crazy person because of it. Former aids say the Vice President has long and careful about security and technology, with some describing it as prudent and others suggesting it's a bit paranoid. The piece also goes on to say that when people visited Harris's office back when she was California as Attorney General, she would instruct aids not to let them wait in her office alone, as if that's not a totally normal thing for people to do. The piece goes on to say that her office did not respond when Politico asked if there was a fun origin story to Harris's bluetoothwariness or for any background on the particular security risks Harris believes bluetooth technology represents. But you know what the journalists who wrote this story could have done to get background on the security risk of bluetooth headphones literally just fucking google it, Because bluetooth headphones are actually an extremely well documented security risk. And this is not some obscure thing that only techy's know. It's a pretty commonly known thing literally first page of Google. Bluetooth's known security risks are also part of the government's official security protocols. For instance, did you know that White House computers have Bluetooth disabled as a default setting for precisely this reason. Last year, the government's National Security Agency Defensive Cybersecurity Branch recommended users disabled Bluetooth altogether to avoid having their conversations compromised. And according to The Daily Beast, who just published a fantastic breakdown of the different security risks, involving Bluetooth. Members of the current Slate Estate Department nominees ranging from would be assistant secretaries to potential ambassadors, have also been warned by the n s A about Bluetooth's potential failability from a security perspective, and briefing is done by security engineering officers with the U S Foreign Service. Nominees are told that an open Bluetooth connection can be a quote cracked window allowing bad actors access to their devices and data. It can also allow attackers to physically track you and create logs of your physical movements, habits, and behavior in ways that can help predict your future movements. The n s A warn nominees that Bluetooth can be used to track your locations using equipment called sniffers, even if your phone cellular service is turned off. And here's the scary case. Cybersecurity researchers found that Bluetooth allowed bad actors to steal targets, contacts, call logs, and messages, and let them send fake messages from their targets phones. Not to be clear, most regular people really do not need to worry about this kind of thing. I know, I personally don't use Bluetooth headphones, not for security reasons, but mostly because I find Bluetooth technology to be kind of stanky and like slow to connect, and honestly, I just don't want to have to worry about losing one of my two air pods on a train. And I also think that the wire can be a really good signal to the world that I am obviously wearing headphones. Those little earbuds can get lost behind my hair, and then people try to talk to you while you're wearing headphones and it's just very awkward. But even though normal people don't really have to worry about this, it's still something that we should all know. And if you're the Vice President of the United States, obviously you need to have this level of awareness about digital security. The Daily Beast talk to a former n Essay threat intelligence analyst who said it's a fine protocol for almost everyone eaven with the vulnerabilities that Blue to present, because these kinds of attacks require reasonably close access to exploit it, along with an actor who has both the capability and the intent to do so. This means only a few thousand people out of the billions on Earth need to worry about this problem. And the Vice President of the United States is one of them. So did political mention any of these widely known and easily verifiable facts about bluetooth technology in their piece about how crazy and paranoid harrisses for not having conversations over bluetooth. Uh? No, of course they didn't. And this is what really makes me so angry. What a missed opportunity to educate and inform the public on the security realities of technology many of us use every day. What is even the point of a piece like this if it's not meant to inform the public And framing Harris is a paranoid, crazy person for following pretty clear digital security guidance isn't just lazy, which it is, I think it's also actively harmful because it obscures the facts. It actively contributes to the public being less informed about the role of technology. But why would a journey let's do something like inform the public when they can settle for cheap attacks on a black woman in politics to frame her as a domineering crazy person. And here's the thing, there are plenty of real reasons to be critical of Vice President Harris. I'm not saying that everybody should or has to agree with her policies or even like her, but that doesn't mean it's okay for her to be attacked with unfair shallow smear jobs either as a black woman. Sometimes it feels like we cannot win. Harris is criticized for buying expensive cookwear and then criticized for using the cheap oh wired headphones that come with your iPhone instead of spending hundreds of dollars for the wireless ones. And even when we do the correct thing, we're still criticized for it. It is exhausting, and what's worse, it doesn't leave room for actual conversations about substance. And I think that's kind of a point. If Harris and black women are associated with controversies, yes even made up b as controversies, it'll create a media ecosystem where black women and women of color can't fairly compete and are being judged by absurd, unfair standard instead of being judged by our policies, words, records, and actions. And media outlets like political need to decide what kind of ecosystem they want to contribute to. Got a story about an interesting thing in tech, or just want to say hi, you can reach us at Hello at tangodi dot com. You can also find transcripts for today's episode at tangdi dot com. There Are No Girls on the Internet was created by me Bridget Tod. It's a production of iHeart Radio and Unboss creative Jonathan Strickland as our executive producer. Terry Harrison is our producer and sound engineer. Michael Amato is our contributing producer. I'm your host, Bridget Todd. If you want to help us grow, rate and review us on Apple Podcasts. For more podcasts from iHeart Radio, check out the iHeart Radio app, Apple podcast, or wherever you get your podcasts.