Political parties represented in Parliament have reacted sharply to the Constitutional Court judgment on the Phala Phala matter, with some opposition parties describing it as a major test for accountability and constitutional democracy. The apex court found that Parliament acted inconsistent with the Constitution when it rejected the Section 89 independent panel report into President Cyril Ramaphosa's conduct relating to the 2020 burglary at his Phala Phala farm. While some parties are calling for the president's immediate resignation, others say Parliament must now urgently begin impeachment proceedings. Mkhokheli Bandla has the details, followed by Former Public Protector, Advocate Busisiwe Mkhwebane says she feels "vindicated" after the Constitutional Court ruled that Parliament's vote on the Section 89 Panel report into the Phala Phala matter was unconstitutional. Mkhwebane took to social media stating that she was unlawfully removed by President Ramaphosa and the DA for following the law and country's constitution

Reflections on 30 Years since the Adoption of the South African Constitution
27:42

Department of Higher Education and Training on a quest to tackle adult illiteracy
05:58

What's next for the GNU, Parliament and President Ramaphosa following Concourt Ruling?
16:29