Sean hits the topic of sexual harassment with admonishment across party lines. Jeffrey Lord sat down with Sean to discuss Bill Clinton's harassment issues and just how abuse ran rampant during his Presidency. It wasn't just the President as Lord tells stories of harassment by Senators Ted Kennedy and Christopher Dodd as well. The Sean Hannity Show is live weekdays from 3 pm to 6 pm ET on iHeartRadio and Hannity.com.
Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com
Let not your heart be troubled. You are listening to the Sean Hannity Radio Show podcast. So, like many of you, I have trouble sleeping. I have insomnia. No matter what I tried, it wouldn't work until I met Mike Lindell and I got my very own my pillow. It has changed my life. What makes my pillows so different is my pillows patented adjustable fill. In other words, you can adjust the patented fill to your exact individual needs so you get the support you need and want to help you get to sleep faster and stay asleep longer. Just go to my pillow dot com or called one six zero nine zero. Remember use the promo code Hannity. When you do, Mike Lindell will give you his best off forever by one pillow and get another one absolutely free. My pillow made in the US a ten year unconditional warranty and it has a sixty day no questions asked money back guarantee. You have nothing to lose. So it's time for you to start getting the quality of sleep that you've been wanting and we need. Just go to my pillow dot com or call eight hundred zero nine zero promo code Hannity take advantage of Mike Special two for one offer my pillow dot com promo code Hannity. The FBI pay Christopher Steele, the author of the dossier, doesn't matter. You'll have to direct to the I think maybe the Special Council. And why is that? It's just I'm just asking if someone I'm not able to reveal uh internal investigatory matters, you know here that's onto the investigation of anybody, but particularly I think that's happened in the summer team. We know the Clinton campaign, the Democratic National Committee paid through a law firm, Fusion GPS to produce the dossier. We know the author was Christopher Steel. It has been reported that he was on the payroll of the FBI. I just want to know if, in fact that is the case. I'm not able to provide an answer to you. The FBI present the dossier to the FSI Court, I'm not able to answer that. Do you know if the FBI did the established process protocol in evaluating claims made in the dossier? I'm not able to answer that. On January six, then FBI do Rector James Comey brief President Elect Trump up in New York about the dossier. Surely thereafter that, the fact that that meeting took place and the subject of the meeting was the dossier was leaked to CNN. Do you know who leaked that information? I do not. Are you investigating who leaked that information? That would be a matter within investigatory powers of the Special councilaid, You've got a number of investigations going on, Mr Attorney General, regarding leaks. Is that likely one of those that you're investigating. I'm not able to reveal the existence of investigations or not. But my concern is we sent you a letter three and a half months ago asking for a second special counsel, and if you're now just considering, I what's it gonna take to get a special counsel? We know that we know that former FBI Director James Comey misled the American people in the summer seen when he called the Clinton investigation a matter obviously an investigation. We know FBI Director Combe was drafting in his honoration letter before the investigation was complete. We know Lauretta Lynch one day before the beg Gazi report came out, five days before Secretary Clinton was scheduled to be interviewed by the FBI, met with former President Bill Clinton on a tarmac in Phoenix. Um, we know after that meeting, when she was corresponding with public relations people to Justice Department, she was using the name Elizabeth Carlyle. You know, as I've said before, it seems to me, if you're just talking golf and grandkids, you can probably use your real name. We know that Mr Comey publicized the investigation, and we know he made the final decision on whether prosecutor or not. And then when he gets fired, he leaks a government document through a friend to the New York Times. And what was his goal? To create momentum for a special counsel. And of course it can't just be any special counsel. It's got to be Bob Noler, his best friend, his predecessor, his mentor the same Bob Mueller who was involved. We've now learned in this whole investigation with the informant regarding Prussian businesses wanting to do business in the Iranian business here in the United States regarding iranium one deal. So I as my main question is what's it gonna take if all that not to mention the dossier information what's it gonna take to actually get a special counsel. It will take a factual basis that meets the standards of the appointment of a special Is that analysis going on right now? Well, that's in the manual of the Department of Justice about what's required. We've only had to the first one was the Waco Janet reno Um Senator Dan Fords who took over that investigation as special counsel, and Mr Muller, each of those a pretty uh special factual situation, and we will use the proper standards. And that's what the only thing I can tell you, Mr Jordan's Well, I appreciate you can have your idea, but sometime we have to study what the facts are and to evaluate whether it meets the standard special counsel. Well, we know one fact. We know the Clinton campaign, the Democratic National Committee paid for through the law firm, paid for the dossier. We know that happened. And it sure looks like the FBI was paying the author of that document. And it sure looks like a major political party was working with the federal government to then turn an opposition research document equivalent of some National Enquirer story into an intelligence document. Take that to the FISA court so that they could then get a warrant to spy on Americans associated with President Trump's campaign. That's what it looks like. And I'm asking you, doesn't that warrant in addition to all the things we know about James colem In sixteen? Doesn't that warrant naming a second special council? As twenty members of this committee wrote you three and a half months ago asking you to do Wellmestr. Columny is no longer to direct to the FBI, and goodness, we have an excellent man of integrity and ability and Chris Right and I think he's going to do an outstanding job. And I'm very happy he's not here today. I would say, I'm here and I'm asking for a time, and the gentleman, I would say, it looks like is not enough basis to uppon a special counsel? Alright, glad you're with us and happy? Whose day edition Sean Hannity show Right down our toll free telephone number. It's eight hundred nine for one. Sean. You want to be a part of the program. Congressman Rohnda Santis, who sits on the House Judiciary Committee that have been grilling Jeff Sessions for the better part of the day. Uh will be with us a lot to a lot to take out of all that. Sarah Carter also joins us today Burgess Owens, NFL Super Bowl champion, author of the book I love the title Liberalism or how to Turn good Men into winer's weenies and whimps, which most liberals are. That's outrageous, Hannity, How could you say that? Uh? Now, let me, I don't know. Let's put it this fright. Let let me start by just telling you something that is a fact. I know more than I can tell you, Hannity. That's not fair. That's your job. You're supposed to share all you know. There are there are things that are happening. By the way, I'll probably get a subpoena for this, and they have no idea what I'm talking about. There are things that are going on. There are a lot of moving parts in all of this, and so I can't give you all of what I know, but I I can get very close to telling you all of what I know. Now. If you listen to Sessions today under questioning from Jim Jordan's you know that you just heard. He's suggesting that the Justice Department is yet to quote find a factual basis. These are these are carefully crafted words that Jeff Sessions is using that would support the appointment of a special prosecutor to invest Hillary Clinton. A lot of us are sitting there saying, oh, man, Hannity, you've told us all about Urani and one. You've told us all about uh, the dossier. You've told us all about the email server scandal. You've gone over all the crimes that potentially likely we're committed by Hillary Clinton. And and Jordan's rightly so is frustrated. Hannity. You're frustrated, Hannay. You like the you like uh, you like Jim Joe and he's a member of the Freedom Caucus, by the way, to see why I like the Freedom Caucus so much. They are it. They are the They're the people I trust in Washington today, and beyond that, not a whole lot of other people. That's just being frank. So Jordan is telling Sessions that he appreciated the fact that the Justice Department was looking at a special council to investigate Uranium one in the Clinton Foundation. Now, remember yesterday's remember yesterday's news that all of this happened because the letter that these Congress been sent three and a half months ago, and by the way, the Justice Department then as an obligation to look into these things. But then there was some ambiguity as to whether or not Jeff Sessions had recused himself from the issues of uranium one, the dossier, et cetera. I now have sources that have told me repeatedly now that in fact, there he did not recuse himself from those specific issues. But if there is an ongoing investigation, it's not something that he's gonna say in an open session or in any session likely with congressman um. But I'm pretty confident all of that is going on, and Jordan's, you know, obviously, is as frustrated as I have been over time. It has taken a long time of really deep investigative digging by myself, by people like Sarah Carter who joins us later, by people like John Solomon and others to get us to the point we wore in all of these things. I mean, I'll give you one example, James Comey, FBI Director James Comey. Okay, Well, here's a guy that made a conclusion about a criminal case, not a matter, a criminal investigation before he even interviewed the main people for the investigation. That tells me the fixes in and James Comey was a part of it. Even used the exact language of what the legal standard is gross negligence. And after three versions of his exoneration letter were written before he ever did the investigation, Well, then they changed it to extreme carelessness, because then that doesn't quote use the exact verbiage of what the statute says. And then you've got the meeting, the inappropriate meeting on the tarmac with Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton. Then you've got Comey sitting with Loretta Lynch. No, don't call it an investigation. Call it what the Clintons wanted to be called. Call it a matter. Well, James Comey needs a full investigation, not even discussing the fact that he purposely leaked information to a friend of his to the New York Times to spark an investigation. All right, so I can say, beyond any shadow of a doubt, there is movement, there is an investigation. Although Justice Department and Jeff's sessions is not. He cannot possibly reveal this but I'm pretty confident that that's going on anyway. Now we've got hours after the Justice Department issued a state statement late last night that they're considering the appointment of a special count council to investigate the Clinton Foundation ties to the rany One scandal. Well, now, then today Jeff Session said he didn't think there's enough evidence to warrant the appointment warrant the appointment of a special counsel, and that was in the political today and he threw cold water on it at this congressional hearing when he was being impressed by Jim Jordan's and Jordan's said that he thought the evidence unearthed and last year about how the FBI decided not to charge Clinton over or handling a classified information at the State Department appeared to be enough to warrant the special counsel. I have, but I agree with Jeff Sessions. I'm sorry, I agree with Jim Jordan, not Jeff Sessions. And it looks like there's not enough basis. Sessions is saying to appoint a special council. That doesn't mean an investigation not ongoing. But the only question is how deep is this gonna be? Now? I have sources that are pretty confident and pretty reliable that there's about to be a major shake up coming to the FBI and big names by the end of next week are going to be leaving, probably shown the doors, more likely the scenario. So that's telling in terms of maybe some of the holdovers from the Obama administration that have obstructed in some way and haven't done their full due diligence on these issues, they may now be pushed out of the way and the investigation will go forward. Uranium one is a perfect example. Uranian one is a case where, Okay, how is it possible America imports uranium because we don't have enough of it? How is it possible? We knew in two thousand and nine because we had an FBI informant inside of this network that Putin had put into this country that was involved in bribery and extortion and money laundering and kickbacks and racketeering, and that Muller knew it. Eric Holder knew it. Rik Holder was one of the nine to sign off on the Iranian one deal a year and a half later, and the same with Hillary Clinton a year and a half later. Then you got the whole aspect of the Clinton's enriching themselves through Bill's speeches, wanting to meet with nuclear officials in Russia asking Hillary State Department, but instead just meets with Vladimir himself, and they did nothing to stop the crimes that were being committed. Now, we had the the informant for four years inside of this network of poutin four years, a little over four years, and and he was reporting back to the FBI, and then they put an NDA on him, which has now been lifted. There's a lot coming out of that. He just got to be patient, unfortunately, and I'm not that patient. And then on top of all that, then you've got you know, he has documents, he has firsthand experience, he's got emails, and he's got tape recordings. Can't wait for all this to become public. And also on top of its sessions reveal more than two dozen investigators looking into the illegal leaks of the deep state. That's good to know, twenty seven at least. And then we've got the dossier issue. We had a lot of stuff coming out here. All right, we'll take a break, we'll come back. A lot of not coming up in the course of the program today. Uh, the latest on Roy Moore is that Ted Cruz and John Corner now have pulled their endorsements and as an outside observer, unless unless Roy Moore comes up with something that is able to to somehow either contradict that that note that he wrote in that yearbook that that that to me is like the smoking gun for him. He needs to explain this away or he's not gonna make it, nor should he make it. How do you explain that when you said you didn't know the person, big problem there for him, and I told you, if you wait, you actually get facts and you begin to make informed decisions. Ah, Hannity, what a novel IDEA quick break right back will continue is busy breaking news Tuesday. And you know how I love hearing great American success stories and sharing them all with you. Well, our favorite T shirt, underwear sock company, Tommy John, Well that's one of them now. Tom Patterson grew up in a small town in South Dakota. After college, he had a successful career. He was selling medical devices on the West Coast, but he quickly became fed up with the ways undershirt kept coming untucked. So, despite having zero background a men's fashion whatsoever, Tom sketched up some designs for smarter undergarments now starting out of his apartment and growing Tommy John to the globally recognized company it is today. Well he achieved, tom did the American dream. Now. Of course there's super soft there undershirts. Guess what, they never come untucked. Plus all of Tommy John underwear is backed by the best pair You'll ever wear guarantee. Or it's free. Go to Tommy John dot com slash Hannity off your first order, Tommy John dot com slash Hannity. You off your first order Tommy John dot com slash Hannity twenty percent off. That's Tommy John dot com slash Hannity ring as a follow up on a promise I made yesterday. All right, how did it go? You put up about how long ago the we have made a decision and we're giving away Curig coffee makers. I wouldn't say we're giving them away. I would say that we gave them away. We put the contest up um a little a while ago, and we put it up on your Facebook and your Twitter, you know, all of your social So what happened? We made an announcement on our website and within fifteen minutes, we had over five hundred entries. Serious people like coffee. Oh man, well you' but you're gonna set up for those people that can prove they had broken their machine. But to support me sent us a video over the weekend and you tweeted at Shawan this weekend and it happened on Sunday or Monday whatever. Um, we're gonna make an effort to reach them. We're gonna make an effort to reach out, and then we're going to be one of the winners and we will make sure to replace You're hopefully we're gonna we're gonna get good ones, right. What we need the best. What you need to do is to make this easier. We can't get the car the curates to come here. You need to get their address and mail them directly. I wish I had thought of that. You already did. Is that what you're telling me? Yeah, the submission from where they put their address them. Yeah, but we have to be able to confirm that it was on the our social before for the ones that broke it, those extra ones. On top of research for a living or to look thoroughly into these cury lost causes Okay. By the way, that's a pretty cool gift, right, I think it's fantastic. And by the way, all well, that ends well, I mean that's amazing. Listen, it's all kumbayats a holiday season. Well, Honestly, as I said last night, I said yesterday, CURI was a victim of you know, a bigot and a bunch of the biggest free anti free speech pro censorship group in America and that they targeted, and so it was I felt bad for them, And you know, I don't want to see anybody at CURIG lose their job because we start instigating a big boycott, which I've never supported, and everyone's breaking their machines and then buying other brands. I I although I like other brands too, but I happen to have Curig, and so everybody, you know, all well, then end well, Right, have a cup of a political Joe, all right, Sean Hannity Show till the top of the hour, one, Shawn, some really fascinating developments as it relates to what has been going on with Roy Moore. Uh, and the cascading impact of now this whole me to campaign and people speaking out. Uh, You've got a yesterday, Mitch McConnell said Judge Moore was unfit to serve in Congress. Paul Ryan said it today. I know that we have other Republicans, John Cornyn and Senator Ted Cruz also have pulled their endorsement UH for Judge Roy Moore. I think a lot of this has to do and you know, one of the reasons you wait for more information because it becomes more revealing. And when you see, you know, Judge Moore said about the fifth woman that he had no idea who she was, and this is the one that had the press conference yesterday and then that woman and produced a yearbook and you know it note that he sent UH and that he wrote in nine seventies seven. Now you might say, well, maybe he didn't remember. But the problem is now this is number five UM, and I think that is now resulting in it is becoming to a lot of people. I've talked to a lot of people that that is for them. Now does it mean a percent? It didn't. If Judge Moore doesn't have an answer for this, then I think that that's probably it. Now. People have pointed out to me on social media again and again, well it doesn't look like his handwriting. I am not a handwriting expert, but it looked like his handwriting to me. And they're like, look at the seven. The seven is not the same. I'm I'm looking at everything that everybody else has looked at. It looked like his signature and looked like he dated it. Um. So I don't know why. Uh, he's not not responding, not taking any interview use and it prevents Uh. It literally now has has presented now a whole variety of problems obviously for Republicans. Um. Although there obviously that the statute of limitations have passed, etcetera, etcetera, there's still only one girl that was under age at the age of fourteen, and um, nobody has has heard from her. I've read some articles. I'm very uncomfortable when people start writing, well, she had a divorce, Okay, but that doesn't mean anything she had to I don't care how many divorces she had. You know, you don't know what happened or that, oh, she's had financial trouble. No. I think you've got to listen closely to when people make remarks, and then you've got to wait, watch, be patient, and see all the information to come in. But I think it's it's it's definitely a hundred times more problematic because he said he didn't know her, and there is this entry into the yearbook. Uh. Now, there's so many things that are developing out of this that may ultimately be a good thing, and that is you have a congresswoman alleging male colleagues expose themselves and grab women's genitals on the House floor. I thought they had cameras on in there all the time. And if it happened, can we get the footage of this and then those people can be thrown out of Congress, you know, Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan, and you know when you have somebody like Ted Cruz who says, all right, this is now to the point where it seems very credible because of the yearbook inscription of this guy. Alright, So the congresswoman's name is Jackie Spire, and you know, if she testified truthfully today, it sounds like there's gonna be people in Capitol Hill. They're gonna be part of this cascading of people being exposed for the strangest behavior. How's Administration Committee held to hearing on sexual rassment in Congress, calling House members to testify anyway. This democ she's a Democrat, Jackie Spire. She represents California's fourteenth district. She dropped a bombshell allegation in her testimony, saying that two active members of Congress are known to be sexual harassers. Quote. In fact, there are two members of Congress Republican, a Republican and a Democrat right now who serve who have been subject to review or have not been subject to review, but have engaged in sexual harassment, she said in her testimony. And she described the alleged actions of these two individuals, who have yet to be officially named, and she said the victims had their private parts grabbed on the House floor. Accused the unnamed colleagues of exposing their genitals. Now all they ask in return is staff members is to be able to work in a hostile, free work environment, she continued. She said they want the system fixed and the perpetrators held accountable. And then she went on to say she was just starting her career in politics and the chief of staff in her office sexually assaulted her. Barbara Comstock, who I've known for years, also told the committee that incidents of sexual harassment and assault were likely being conducted by current House members, telling the story of an unnamed representative who allegedly showed their genitals to a female staffer. What is wrong with these people? I don't know, you know, It's like Louis c k. I mean, I read that story and I want to vomit? What is wrong with people? Anyway? You have a top you know, I want one thing that is interesting. This is where I want to go with with all of this. Moe Brooks says he's for now standing by more, but he's not ruling out running as a right. And he was my original choice down in Alabama. Um, you know, you did have the whole issue of Bob Menendez. The you know, you have witnesses against the new Jersey Democratic senator. You know, we're so credible that a federal grand jury indicted him and we're waiting to see what has happened. Anyway, his trial jury announced today that they're dead yesterday that the deadlock, but the indictment still stands. And you know, one thing I will say, you know, is does anybody ever talk about the the incidents involving him? You know, because if you go back for example, you know, and I know Menendez his lawyers are unhappy with the instructions, but and the Alabama Secretary of State standing by Roy Moore. But it's an interesting impact to all of this. And you know, as somebody that is watching all of this unfold, like all of you, I'm thinking, wow, think of Ted Kennedy. He killed a woman. You know, I know all these Republicans thought they were best friends with the Lion of the Senate and chapel Qua. He drove up a car into a into a into a literally water body of water, and then he got out, saved himself, left the girl there and she died. And when he left, he didn't go to get help. He went home and went to bed and told nobody, and the girl died in the process. And there was a home across the street with a light on that night, and all he had to do was race over there and say, please help, please help. Is a girl in the you know, in a car that just went in the water. He didn't do that. Then you got I was shocked by this piece in the New York Times, and it's now coming out everywhere, and liberals now are gonna have to you know, is it a time of reckoning for their support of Bill Clinton. Remember I I I've interviewed all the Clinton women over the years, many times, Dolly, Kyle Browning, Paula Jones, Jennifer Flowers, Kathleen Willie wanted a Broderick. Then it all happened with Monica Lewinsky, and people started to say, but you know, if you think of the Clintons, they always denied it. The great champion of women's right, Hillary Clinton used every excuse, and then all their surrogates went out there and every time they did the same thing. They smeared, they slandered, they be smirched, They attacked the women brutally, even Monica Lewinsky. So the New York Times as a headline, Oh, it's past time for the Clintons to be investigated for his victims of sexual assault. That's the headline starts out, Be careful what you wish for. I have no idea what went on with Roy Moore and the demands inc This is I'm reading from the piece, and the demands increase for Republicans in Washington for him to get out of the Alabama Senate race. Now Texas Senator Ted Cruz has withdrawn his support for More, as has Utah Senator Mike Lee and Senators McCain and Flake, you know. But then it says, if More in fact did what he's accused of, he should be gone from this race in an instant, which I agree with wholeheartedly with the decision made by the people of Alabama. Meanwhile, the Hollywood scandals, you know, proceed now even liberals are beginning to get the drift, if decades later, of the mess liberalism has created. This is a devastating column. And then it goes on. It's crystal clear, as noted in the American Spectator. Blah blah, blah blah. You know who wrote this piece, By the way, this is sorry, this is in the New York Times. This is the American spect This was Jeffrey Lord is going to join us later. It's clear, as noted in the Space that you know, in the sixties Revolution and in Dying in our Eyes, Death by a thousand cuts, by the very liberal culture that gave a birth from howevery Weinstein and Kevin Spacey and on and on and all the celebrity names mentioned in these eye popping accounts, The industry glorified sex is now having second thoughts. But it only took a few decades. But now that this is happening and there's an apparent desire to revisit old charges, Democrats have now opened a Pandora's box. But go no further then this headline from the Atlantic, and I've got this reckoning with Bill Clinton sex crimes from the left wing. That's what it says. Feminists saved the forty scond president of the United States. They were on the wrong side of history and it's finally time to make things right. And it's true, you know, it's for a lot of people, a lot of this as I you know, I said, what whatever is going on with Roy Moore needs to be above politics. It's too serious a charge a thirty two year old man molesting a a fourteen year old girl, it's too serious. And as a father and as a brother, and as somebody that is nothing but the utmost respectful women, I just it's creepy, it's disgusting. And what is it with everybody, you know, feeling that they have a right to take out their private parts and show people that don't want to see them. There's something really sick about this and Louis seek It's just it's so creepy. But for all those people that participate, oh, dragon dollars to a trailer park, never know what you're gonna get. And the charges by the Clinton women were in the case of Juanita Brodericker was raped. In the case of Kathleen Willie, it was her going to see Bill Clinton in the Oval office getting grabbed and touched and fondled and groped and kissed by Bill Clinton, you know, against her will. In the case of Paula Jones, it was him literally dropping his pants and saying kiss it. In the case of Jennifer Flowers, it was an ongoing affair and then just just they just ran over her and called her every name in the book. And then there were so many other women too. But the left. Here's the piece I was talking about. I believe Juanita. This came out this week in the New York Times and it said On Friday night, MSNBC host Chris Hayes sent out a tweet that electrified online conservatives as gross and cynical and hypocritical as the right as the rights what about Bill Clinton stuff is It's also true Democrats and the center left are overdue for a real reckoning, with allegations against him and his tweet inspired stories on Glenn Beck's The Blaze and Bright Part and The Daily Caller and apparently eager to use the Clinton scandals to derail discussions about Roy Moore. That's that's not true, but there isn't pointing out a double standard is legitimate, just a legitimate fact. All of this, in my opinion, should transcend politics. If you abuse women, then you shouldn't be in any position of power, and if you commit crimes, you should be put behind bars. I don't care if you're a Republican or a Democrat, but anyway, he actually said he agrees in the New York Times with Hayes in this me too moment where reassessing decades of male misbehavior turning open secrets and open secrets into expo, say, and we should clearly look at the credible evidence that one Eda Broderick told the truth when she accused Bill Clinton and raping her. I've interviewed, I had the second interview with I wanted to Broaderick. It took everything I could do in that interview not to cry cruise and corning. I just think what's the truth. That's what I've been saying since the beginning of this. Roy Moore now has an explanation. You're gonna explain how you said you didn't know the woman and she's got this what do you call those books? The yearbook that he wrote as I guess he was in his thirties as an assistant d A at the time to a girl graduating high school. It makes no sense to me the way he wrote that. That's just my take. Now he's got questions to answer. We'll invite him back, will invite the anybody that wants to come on this program. I'll interview everybody. That's what I do. I know it's surprising. I'm a controversial host, have been my whole life and career. I'm not gonna change tomorrow. Alright, eight nine for one, Shawn Tofrey telephone number. Now we have Congressman Ron de Santas, he was there. He's on the House Judiciary Committee. You know, the grilling of Jeff's sessions that has been going on throughout most of the day here. Uh by the way, Now, now Ted Cruz is saying that, in fact, he should quit the Senate race. Paul Ryan is saying the same thing, and it just looks like, you know, speaker, he should step aside because the allegations are credible. Well, now it appears that they are based on now evidence that we have. It's important you're not rushed to judgment. Either he comes out with a statement and talks about how he contradicted himself, or it's over. We'll have to see what happens in the next twenty four hours. But it's looking like it's over to me. All right, we'll get to that. We have Jeff Lord, we have Sarah Carter check it in, and Burgess Owen's coming by today. So the second thing that concerned me when I asked Roy Moore, if um and I'm just saying on the yearbook, it's like, wow, there's red flags there. And when I said, well, was it your general practice to date in your thirties when you're thirty two girls in their late teens, not the fourteen year old, but the seventeen eight, he goes, well, it wasn't my usual practice, and I usually another time he said, well, I usually asked the parents permission. I felt like he was dodging anyway. We'll get your thoughts on a much more straight ahead y f B. I take Christopher Steele, the author of the docier doesn't matter. You'll have to direct to the I think maybe the special counsel. And why is that? It's just I'm just asking if someone I'm not to reveal uh internal investigatory on matters you know here that's onder the investigation of anybody, but particularly I think that it's happened in the summer teen. We know the Clinton campaign, the Democratic National Committee paid through a law for infusing GPS to produce the dossier. We know the author was Christopher Steel. Has been reported that he was on the payroll of the FBI. I just want to know if, in fact that is the case. I'm not able to provide an answer to you. The FBI present the dossier to the FISA court, I'm not able to answer that. Do you know if the FBI did the established process protocol in evaluating claims made in the dossier? I'm not able to answer that. On January six, then FBI Director James Commey brief President elect Trump up in New York about the dossier. Shortly thereafter that, the fact that that meeting took place and the subject of the meeting was the dossier was leaked to CNN? Do you know who leaked that information? I do not. Are you investigating who leaked that information? That would be a matter within investigatory powers of the special counsel? Said, You've got a number of investigations going on, Mr Attorney General, regarding leaks. Is that likely one of those that you're investigating. I'm not able to reveal existence of investigations or not. But my concern is we sent you a letter three and a half months ago asking for a second special counsel, and if you're now just considering, I what's it gonna take to get a special counsel? We know that we know that former FBI Director James Comey misled the American people in the summer sixteen when he called the Clinton investigation a matter so obviously an investigation. We know FBI Director Comey was drafting in his honoration letter before the investigation was complete. We know Loretta Lynch, one day before the Bengazi report came out, five days before Secretary Clinton was scheduled to be interviewed by the FBI, met with former President Bill Clinton on a tarmac in Phoenix. UM We know after that meeting, when she was corresponding with public relations people to Justice Department, she was using the name Elizabeth Carlyle. You know, as I've said before, it seems to me, if you're just talking golf and grandkids, you can probably use your real name. We know that Mr Comey publicized the investigation, and we know he made the final decision on whether prosecutor or not. And then and he gets fired. He leaks a government document through a friend to the New York Times, And what was his goal to create momentum for a special counsel? And of course it can't just be any special counsel. It's gotta be Bob Nohler, his best friend, his predecessor, his mentor, the same Bob Mueller who was involved. We've now learned in this whole investigation with the informant regarding Prussian businesses wanting to do business in the Iranian business here in the United States regarding iranium one deal. So I guess my main question is, what's it gonna take, if all that not to mention the dossier information, what's it gonna take to actually get a special counsel? It will take a factual basis that meets a standards of the appointment of a special Is that analysis going on right now? Well, that's in the manual of the Department of Justice about what's required. We've only had to the first one was the Waco Janet Reno U Senator Dan Fords who took over that investigation as special counsel, and Mr Muller, each of those are pretty uh special factual situation. We will use the proper standards, and that's what the only thing I can tell you, Mr Jordan's, Well, I appreciate you can have your idea, but sometime we have to study what the facts are and to evaluate whether it needs the standard. Well, well, we know one fact. We know the Clinton campaign, the Democratic National Committee paid for through the law firm, paid for the dossier. We know that happened, and it sure looks like the FBI was paying the author of that document. And it sure looks like a major political party was working with the federal government to then turn in opposition research document equivalent of some National Enquirer story into an intelligence document, take that to the FISA court so that they could then get a warrant to spy on Americans associated with President Trump's campaign. That's what it looks like. And I'm asking you, doesn't that warrant, in addition to all the things we know about James colem in sixteen, doesn't that warrant naming a second special council? As twenty members of this committee wrote you three and a half months ago asking you to do well, Mr Colomy is no longer to direct to the FBI. Goodness. We have an excellent man of integrity and ability and Chris Ray, and I think he's going to do an outstanding job and I'm very happy he's not here today. I would say, I'm al and I'm asking for a time, and the gentleman, I would say, it looks like is not enough basis? Too upon a special counsel? All right? Not enough basis. That was the fiery exchange, of course, with Jim Jordan, Congressman Jim Jordan of Ohio, who was a frequent guest on this program eight hundred nine one, Shawn, you want to be a part of the program, all right? Joining us now to discuss a lot of this, as Congressman Ron de Santis, both members of the House Judiciary Committee, uh discussing the testimony given by the attorney general. Uh, we start with Congressman de Santis. Welcome back to the program, sir, how are you What is your general reaction to that. He basically came out and said, it doesn't appear to warrn a special counsel, and from my way of thinking, I don't know any other case that really would. It seems to me they you know, look, it's possible. I guess that there's an ongoing investigation that he can talk about a serious investigation, but he's giving no indication that there is. And there's a feeling among people like me that we have a dual justice system in America. So yeah, yeah, I think it was problematic. I mean, first of all, when he got confirmed, he said he was going to refuse for anything involving the Clintons, including the foundation, So he cannot be overseeing and be consistent with this testimony and investigation into the foundation and uranium one. So I think Jim Jordan and me and other guys who are trying to push this, we've said it's pretty much a special counsel or bust because he's already said he was going to refuse under those circumstances. And I was able to question him after Jim did about whether the Obama administration's FBI informed the members of the board that approved the uranium deal, and and Sessions didn't know, but he told me that, well, there was the macium who got convicted, but that was several years after. So I think he's operating under the assumption that the FBI informant who's forward, who's going to provide this information to Congress, didn't start getting information until after this deal was approved, which is not correct, Sean. As you know, this FBI informant was two thousand and nine. Two thousand and nine, it was a year and a half before the cifiust board approved uranium one. So there was all this evidence of bribery, kickbacks, money laundering. He's providing his his communications to us, We're gonna get all that. But I just I think that the Attorney General is operating under a different set of assumptions than the rest of us who have actually uh studied the case and know that this informant was that there collecting very damaging evidence very early on. Alright, So now, but this is the point, because we had Russian operatives inside the United States, we knew because of the f B I informant, he was within the network. He has tape recordings, he has firsthand experience, he has documents, he has emails. They slapped an NDA on him, which has only been lifted recently. I can't wait to get this guy before Congress, and I hope it's a public hearing. I'd like to know. In other words, why did the FBI director at the times, Muller, how would you allow bribery, extortion, kickbacks, money laundering, and racketeering going on by Putin's thugs in the United States as he's trying to get a foothold in the ranium market not do anything about it. And then you have the Attorney General at the time, Eric Holder. You have the Secretary of State at the time, Hillary Clinton, you know, signing off on this deal. And then of course the kickback money and what I look at is maybe paid to play money given back to the Clintons. Well, it's exactly right. And then we also now know that even though the Democrats had always said, oh, this uranium can't be exported, so what's the big deal to national security that actually it was exported and we are trying to confirm, but we think it ended up in the hands of some countries that we don't want to have our uranium. So this is a major, major issue. And for Robert Mueller or Eric Holder not to inform other members of that board, not to inform the Congress that underlying this whole Uranium one proposal was all this corruption, there's no justification for withholding that information. But based on today's hearing, I think that Congress is going to have to do the heavy lifting. I think it's still possible to get a special counsel, but I think what's gonna happen is we're gonna have to have the informing come in. We're gonna get all the done. I was told by multiple d o J sources directly to me that he did not recuse himself from Uranium one, that he did not recuse himself from the dossier. Well, so maybe that's true, Seanna. He did not answer that question directly, but with the dossier was very frustrating to listen to the exchange with Jim Jordans, because here's the thing, even if you've recused yourself, it's a fact. Whether the FBI did they or did they not pay Christopher Steele for this the taxpayers have a right to know how their money was spent. Did the FBI or did they not use the information to get surveillance on Trump assis by the way, that that could what if that was the predicate, in other words, the phony dossier that bought and paid for by Hillary and Hillary her campaign and her running the d n C. According to Donna Brazil, what if that was the tipping point for the FISA warrant or any other warrant that might have been issued to start the investigation allow surveillance of an opposition candidate like this, it would mean that the FBI launched a counterintelligence investigation based off opposition political opposition research paid for by one political party for use against another's nominee. It would probably be the most politicized the FBI in Justice Department has ever been. And if in fact that's the case, and then once they got the surveillance, remember what happened all the months of leaking to the press about Trump campaign contacts with Russia. It was all this smoke and puff to try to advance the Russian narrative. There was never any facts that showed there was collusion, but that was what was used. The fruits of that surveillance. Illegally leak surveillance was what the media used to advance the narrative for those many months up until the Special Council was appointed. I cannot believe that we've had a year's worth of investigation, no evidence at all of Trump Russia collusion. The indictment of Paul Manafort has nothing to do with Russia whatsoever. And here we have an overwhelming amount of incontrovertible evidence that that we have Clinton d n C. Bought and paid for lies to influence an election, and we have utter complete incompetence and potentially selling out our national security as it relates to Vladimir Putin in the Iranian one deal, because we have to we have to import uranium. We don't have enough for our own needs. So why would we ever allow a foreign entity, especially a hostile actor like like Russian and Putin to take control of of of our of our uranium. And then we know that it got shipped out, We know it went to to Europe. We know it also likely went to Asia and other places and Canada. All right, quick break, we'll come back. We'll continue. Congressman Ron De Santis at the bottom of the hour, Jeffrey Lord will check him with us, and we'll check in with him right as we continue with Congressman Ron des Santis of Florida. Were talking about the Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Capitol Hill today. Uh, the Clintons have skated their entire life as it relates to the dossier. Well, that seems to me like like Hillary Clinton, Russian collusion, bought and paid for salacious lies about Donald Trump to influence the election. Like you, I would like to know why James Comey wanted to pay them this guy, Christopher Steele, the fifty dollars for these lies. Um, you can't find out. We haven't found out if he did pay him any money yet. Well we can. We just have to get the full weight of the House behind subpoena and the document. I think that they should just declassify all the flies the applications involving Trump, but they've not been willing to do that. And the reason I think is is because it's not Sessions making the decision, it's his deputy, Rod Rosenstein, and so he's really they've been fighting the Congress on this. I think will eventually get it. But but isn't this a problem that that Rosenstein and Mueller and others knew about, you know a lot of the collusion as it relates to or the efforts of Plutin's thugs in America, bribery, extortion, all the things we're talking about. You know, doesn't this maybe implicate them in some way? Don't they need to be answering questions on uranium one? So therefore anything associated with Russia and Clinton they probably want to avoid. They're definitely implicating uranium one. Mueller with the FBI director during this time, and this would have been a major matter that the FBA was FBI was investigating, given the foreign influence, given the uranium subject matter. And then Rosenstein is u S attorney from Maryland. He priended up prosecuting the main protagonists here. McKiernen, I think the question for Rosenstein is when were you given the k And if you were given the case in two thousand nine or two thousand ten, and they were already known violations of law, why did you wait to prosecute it until Maybe as a good answer for that, I haven't heard it, but all of those issues are definitely going to need to be vetted in this uranium one investigation. I gotta tell you, it's really beyond this concerting not knowing. If my sources are right, there are serious investigations going on and they're just not talking about it. At some point, you know, the American people seems like everything leaks as it relates to Trump. Nothing leaks on the Democratic side. It's unbelievable. Well that's partly because, I mean, we have a bureaucracy that's hospital to Trump, and that really the lot of the leaking that's been done against Trump has been weaponized, leaks designed a kneecap his administration. And it's it's concerning because they're violating a lot to do. But it's also we have an election, we elect the president. The permanent bureaucracy doesn't like that president, so they're basically rebelling against the people's choice. Um. It really is just unacceptable. And I think you're right, Sean about this two tiered justice system. I mean, look, with the special Counsel, they prosecute this Papa Dupuless guy being a false statement. He said he reached out to the professor two weeks before he became an advisor to the campaign. And unpaid advisor. Turns out it was two weeks after he became an unpaid advisor, so it was a false statement. There's no doubt about it. So he gets a felony plea. What about Hillary Clinton? Testifying before the Benghazi Committee, She said that she turned over all her work related emails. That is demonstrably false. She said her attorneys went through every single email and decided what was work related. False. She said there were no classified markings on any of her emails. Fault. So she makes all these false state and you have the same law that's supposed to apply to her, and yet she's not been even a slap on the wrist for any of those. All Right, I gotta let it go there. We're going to continue to follow THO one. Shawn, you want to be a part of the program. Did you call her a narcissistic looney tone? I am not going to comment on what I did or did not say. Back in the late nineties, my nurse came back to the room, found me with my bloody swollen whip, and we left immediately and came home. He U U was getting ready and went to the door and there I there, I sat on the bed just devastated, and he goes to the door, casually, puts on his sunglasses and says, you better get some ice on. That she held onto my hand and she said, do you understand everything that you do? I mean cold chills went out my spine. That's the first time I became afraid of that woman. People have been harassing my husband for gosh, I don't know ever since I've known him. I only she knew it. Like I said, it was a political relationship that they had. It wasn't a normal average marriage. She didn't even stand up for the women that I knew what her husband did, and she knew what her husband did to those women. She there's no way that she did not know that. Here they come again. We're going to have to just ride through this as we have so many of these other false accusation. There's been a lot of people that's come up Dan in Arkansas, and I've had a lot of people ask Archie, scared for your life, and actually I have been. We will destroy you. As what they said to me, who said my brother said it on behalf of Billy when he was campaigning for him. I have to believe that it is in large measure motivated by people who just flat out disagree with the kind of politics and policies that my husband believes her best for America is here in any danger at this point. People I used to used to think that really really, yeah, I was. I was very scared. I was horribly, horribly threatened. And people don't know that story. Well, I don't think there's any doubt that there are professional forces on the right um at work for their own purposes and profit. Um. There are just so many curious relationships among a lot of people and various institutes and entities, UM. And I think that that deserves thorough investigation. Why did you originally deny it considering this was a legal matter? Did you see what happened to Jennifer Flowers? Did you see what was happening to Paula Jones? My alegan, Yes, no, not afraid. I just I just knew what would happen if I ever had to meet her. In partition, it would be very hard for me not to walk up to Smacker. I know that sounds mean. I mean she put me through a lot twelve years old. I mean I had to go look through this window, and I do these guys, I just want to know you had a daughter and grand baby. One happens at that daughter of here's that that would have been her, and they pulled you in at that time to do that. What would you did? He would have if you would have a defense, I mean, you would have protected her where you don't know me? So I'm be scrapped to you, you know, and it cares about me as long as you can win. Your first case is an attorney and that was her first case ever. All right, glad you're with us twenty what for now till the top of the hour, one Sean. So there you here. All of the women over the years that have talked about Bill Clinton, I think every one of them. I have interviewed most of the multiple times. And in light of everything that has now shifted in reaction to the Roy Moore situation and and Hollywood, and it just goes on and on and on. You know. Now even liberals are raising incredible point punts and as an article even in the New York Times, it's past time for the Clintons to be investigated for his victims of sexual assaults. Here's another headline. Media force to acknowledge Bill Clinton's alleged sex crimes. And then there's a Bill Clinton The Atlantic are reckoning, a New York Times piece. This goes back to what this past week? This's this week, I believe Juanita in the New York Times, in the New York Times, and you can flash back and see how the media handled all this. Dan Rather, oh that uh that those are old charges against Bill Clinton. What's happening here is the day of reckoning? Does that mean everybody that made up every lie and every attack? Do you realize when you go through the list of women, you heard the voice of Dolly Kyle Browning, you heard the voice of Paula Jones, you heard the voice of Jennifer Flowers, and Kathleen Willie and Juanita broad Rick. And then of course this was all done. And then Monica Lewinsky happens, and it's a vast right wing conspiracy. Hillary Clinton, champion of women's rights, She never did a thing as it relates to any of these women except partner with her best friends and smear and slander and besmirch any woman that dared to make any allegation against her husband. Seems to be compelling evidence that she knew the whole time. She's supposed to be the champion of women's rights, just like the money she took from these countries that abuse women and kill gays and lesbians and persecute Christians and Jews, something we have chronicled as we're the only ones that do it. And now is the day of reckoning. Now Here is the day of reckoning for Dragon Dollar through a trailer park James Carville's comments, day of reckoning there for that, a day of reckoning for the attacks against all these women by the Clinton machine. Does it make a difference now? What about all the Democrats that went out there and defended everything every night, every day, all of these tactics, all of these smears to make a difference now. Jeff Lord, former Associo political director in the Regular administration, wrote the best selling book What American Needs. He wrote the case for Trump, long before others thought that Donald Trump could win. He has an article in Today's American Spectator addressing a history of predators in in politics. You know, it's fascinating and I'm I'm watching as you are, and it's it's obviously getting worse for Judge Roy Moore every day. Uh, you know, if you want, if you look at the entry in the yearbook, for example, that has has made a lot of news. You look at that sounded weird and so obviously that Ted Cruz and and others and John Cornyn have now pulled their support for Roy Moore. But if you're comparing contrast the treatment of Republicans versus Democrats when these issues come up, it's very different, isn't it. Oh? My? Absolutely absolutely. And you know one interesting thing I heard from our friend Rush today. Roy Moore was a Democrat for years and the first thought that went through my mind is, let's see, nothing was said about this, and he was a Democrat. Now he's a Republican, and all of a sudden, these stories are spilling out. Well, when did he become a Republican? You're saying that the allegations were out of time. He was a registered Democratic, by the way, Not that it matters to victims. No, No, I mean absolutely, just no. Look, I mean we as conservatives, I mean there's just no excuse for this, none, this kind of behavior. The point is here that there is a political issue. I mean, I wrote a column a few weeks ago when before we got here to Roy Moore, and it was Harvey Weinstein, and I pointed out that in nineteen ninety nine, when ken Starr had put out the Star Report on Bill Clinton and and all the stories were out there about Bill Clinton, who showed up literally in front of ken Starr's home in the suburbs of Virginia, but Michael Moore with a camera and a group of people dressed like Puritans, holding the Star Report up and yelling at him as he got into his car as as a start out into his car Fornicator Center, etcetera. Then they climbed on the back of a flat bud flatbed truck, were driven all around Washington and went up to Capitol Hill outside of hearing where Star Wars, etcetera, mocking members of Congress. The whole point of the exercise was that people who objected to the things that Bill Clinton had done with women were a bunch of puritans and prudes, an old fashioned moralists, and they were out of touch with society. Well, that was the prevailing sentiment there. And I found a review in The New York Times of Michael Moore's television show in which he showed this clip and the and the reviewer for The New York Times thought it was just fabulous, just terrific. Now all of a sudden, these people are saying, my goodness, this is horrific. Where were they? Where were they? For decades? I mean, this is so inexcusable. And if there's one thing that could come out of this that's a good thing, is to put a stop for this and the column I have today that you mentioned. The House and Senate can separately pass resolutions putting out there the sense of the Senate or the sense of the House of Representatives, and they can condemn the Clintons, and they can call for committee action to investigate the stuff and give one eyed to Broderick and these other women their time uh in in court as it were. It's not going to be a court. It will be the halls of Congress. But how about putting putting you know, your money where your mouth is and doing this. Where is Mitch McConnell doing this? Where, for that matter in Alabama is Doug Jones, the Democrat? Well think of all the you know, you can take it back even further. I mean, you know, look at the case of Mary Joe Capecney. We know what Ted Kennedy, did I mean Ted Kennedy, you know, drives off a bridge into water, he escapes, He leaves this girl who's in the car in the water to drown as he went home. He didn't tell anybody, He told nobody and then only comes out the next Now, well, he was the respected lion of the Senate, Ted Kennedy, and many Republicans of them in he had the famous waitress sandwich incident in the back room of a restaurant that I had been at many times called the labras Aries, a French restaurant. They had a private room. He was there with Chris Dodd. The two of them got drunk as skunks. This waitress goes in there to wait on them, and they throw her on the table and then you know, positioned her between the two men, etcetera. And they're on the floor or on the or whatever. I mean, it's just disgusting. And then what happens. Nothing, nothing, And when I hear you know, John McCain waxing indignant about Roy Moore, John McCain was in the Senate with Ted Kennedy. What did he do about this? Nothing? Not a single thing. Ted Kennedy, and I don't. I don't remember. You know, many people defending in the Republican Party, the likes of all the women who I just mentioned. No, I actually took the time my interview at all of them numerous times. Yes, you did, and God bless you for doing that. I mean, because by the way, I came under fire for doing that too. By the way, that's about the story of my whole life coming onto fire. Yeah. Yeah, Well, I just I just think Sean, that that that if there's one good thing here that can come out of all this, have the Congress do something and called Clinton's both Clinton's to account on these things. Did the issue of the yearbook have an impact on you like it did me? Yeah? I think so. I mean I just how does that? How does that happen? I mean, you know, everybody gets older, and if you just don't there are there are just things instinctively that you just wouldn't do. I just I just him appalled. So what should happen? What do you think should happen? I really do think that the decision has to be made by the people of Alabama. I mean, this is the United States Senate, and it's not run by senators in Washington. It's run by the people in the states, and uh, you know, I think people can get out there and say whatever they want to say, but this is a decision for the people of Alabama and they have to make it. All right, I gotta take a quick break. We'll come back more with Jeff Lord, News Round Up, Information Overload, Sarah Carter and Burgess Owen will check in in the next hour. Right as we continue with Jeff Lord writes a piece of The American Spectator, you is surprised that, you know, I look through these articles today and I'm looking at you know, these are people on the left now saying, uh, we now have to revisit how we treated all these Clinton women and how we were part of the efforts to slander smere besmirche um, which I think would if they mean it, that would be great. I'm not sure every Democrat wants to do it. And it seems when it comes to all things Clinton's, it's circle the wagons at any cost. Yeah, I was surprised. I mean that the first one that I saw that surprised me was Chris Hayes over there at MSNBC. Uh. And then this Atlantic article was Wow, that was pretty amazing, pretty amazing, But it just gets to the fundamental truth here. There are some things that should just be beyond partisan consideration. And why they were quiet about all of this, and this was I was in the Bush forty one administration when Clarence Thomas was nominated for the court, and I thought Clarence Thomas was smeared up and down, and I thought that no small part of it had to do with the fact that he was black and a conservative. But I saw all these women coming out saying that women tell the truth. There was a column in the New York Times listened to us all this very sharp and said, well, then you got to the Clinton episode, and all these people were silent. Not only silent, they were active supporters. And the Clinton folks were out there trying to destroy these women, destroy their reputations, destroying everything about them. And these people, including Hillary Clinton, were actively involved in this, and not a peep from these from these women. You know, women tell the truth. Suddenly, now all these people, you know, you dragged the dollar bills through a hundred dollar bill, whatever it was, through a trailer park, it was a dollar bill, disgraceful, it was. It was a dollar bill and even even Monica Lewinsky of all people, I mean, she got it the worst. Yes, she did what they called her a stalker and and all of this kind of thing. And let's recall, I mean Bill Clinton was how old at that point and she was twenty two. He was the you want to talk about a power position, he was the president of the United States, That's right. I mean, having worked having worked for a president, a president, I mean, that's it. Boy, when the boss speaks, you know, you you listen, and uh that that kind of behavior coming from a sitting president of the United States or a past president of the United States is just beyond belief. I don't know. We gotta let it go. But Jeff grab comments appreciate it. Talk to you soon, Uh, Sarah Carter, we're gonna get into investigative journalists, breaking news on Fusion GPS and now it looks like we're gonna get to the bottom of the dossier and when we get to the bottom of Uranium one and the truth behind the corruption. Also Burgess Owen, well, he will respond to the whole issue of GCS decision to nominate, you know, a known cop hater and thug Dictators supporter Colin Kaepernick as their Citizen of the Year. That more straight ahead, the FBI paid Christopher Steele, the author of the dossier. It doesn't matter, You'll have to direct to the I think maybe the Special Counsel. And why is that? It's just I'm just asking if someone to reveal uh internal investigatory matters, you know here that's under the investigation of anybody, but particularly I think that it's happened in the summer team. We know the Clinton campaign, the Democratic National Committee paid through a law firm Fusing GPS to produce the dossier. We know the author was Christopher Steel. It has been reported that he was on the payroll of the FBI. I just want to know if in fact that is the case. I'm not able to I don't answer to you. The FBI present the dossier to the FSI court, I'm not able to answer that. Do you know if the FBI did the established process protocol in evaluating claims made in the dossier? I'm not able to answer that. On January six, then FBI Director James Comy brief President elect Trump up in New York about the dossier. Surely thereafter that the fact that meeting took place and the subject of the meeting was the dossier was leaked to CNN. Do you know who leaked that information? I do not. Are you investigating who leaked that information? That would be a matter within investigatory powers of the special counselaid, You've got a number of investigations going on, Mr Attorney General, regarding leaks. Is that likely one of those that you're investigating. I'm not able to reveal the existence of investigations or not. But my concern is we sent you a letter three and a half months ago asking for a second special counsel, and if you're now just considering, I what's he gonna take to get a special counsel? We know that we know that former FBI Director James Comey misled the American people in the summer steen when he called the Clinton investigation a matter obviously investigation. We know FBI Director Comey was drafting in his honoration letter before the investigation was complete. We know Loretta Lynch, one day before the beg Gazi report came out, five days before Secretary Clinton was scheduled to be interviewed by the FBI, met with former President Bill Clinton on a tarmac in Phoenix. Um, we know after that meeting, when she was corresponding with public relations people to Justice Department, she was using the name Elizabeth Carlyle. You know, as I've said before, it seems to me, if you're just talking golf and grandkids, you can probably use your real name. We know that Mr Comey publicized the investigation, and we know he made the final decision on whether prosecute or not. And then when he gets fired, he leaks a government document through a friend to the New York Times. And what was his goal to create momentum for a special counsel. And of course it can't just be any special unsel. It's gotta be Bob Nohler, his best friend, his predecessor, his mentor the same Bob Mueller who was involved. We've now learned in this whole investigation with the informant regarding Prussian businesses wanting to do business in the Iranian business here in the United States regarding the uranium one deal. So I guess my main question is, what's it gonna take if all that not to mention the dossier information, what's it gonna take to actually get a special counsel. It will take a factual basis that meets the standards of the appointment of a specially. Is that analysis going on right now? Well, that's in the manual of the Department of Justice about what's required. We've only had to the first one was the Waco Janet reno Um Senator Dan Fords who took over that investigation as special counsel, and Mr Muller, each of those a pretty uh special factual situation, and we will use the proper standards. And that's what only thing I can tell you. Mr Jordan's, well, I appreciate you can have your eye. Yeah, but sometimes we have to study what the facts are and to evaluate whether it needs the standard special council. And Mr Attorney General, Um, does your accusal from investigations related to the interference by Russia in the two thousand sixteen presidential campaign applied to any investigations regarding efforts by the Democratic National Committee in the Clinton campaign UH to secretly fund a squirrelsts and widely discredited dossier on candidate Donald Trump message habit um. Anything that arises in this nature, uh, that maybe or may not be connected to the my recusal on the question of the campaign in Russia would be discussed between me the senior Ethics Advisor at the Department of Justice, and that's how I make my decision. That's what I promise to do when I was confirmed before the Senate Judiciary Committee, and that's what I will do. And I'm unable to provide information to you as to what decision would be has been made in this manner. All right, news round up, information overload our Those were the hearings earlier today, Congressman Jim Jordans really putting it to the Attorney General Jeff Sessions, and Steve Schabat Congressman Ohio also doing the same thing. Joining us now to react to all of this, Sarah Carter. She has been in the forefront as an investigative journalist on all of these issues and very particularly fusion, GPS and uranium one. And Sarah joins us, Now, what was your reaction, especially to the Jim Jordan's questioning, Well, I thought first Jim Jordan's questioned Carson Jordan was was they were great because it was getting out there people were during the same questions that Cortress has been reiterating over and over again to the public was able to see what was really frustrating a lot of the for the conference. But secondly, another really important point Shne was that a lot of those questions are considered. I've talked to sources, I went, I was in the hearing, but immediately following that discussion, I was on the phone with people. A lot of that is classified. It wouldn't have been the place for the Attorney General to speak and to answer a lot of those questions regarding the FBI, whether or not they paid, how much were they paying Christopher Bristile, if they paid Christoph Bristile for the doctier, did they help fund it? All of those questions are considered right now part of an ongoing investigation and are classified. So they are things that are being looked into. But the Attorney General just can't answer those questions in a public setting, and I don't even think in a private setting right now, as these investigations are ongoing. All right, So my sources told me, and and this is what you do every day, so I know you have better sources than me that in fact, Jeff Sessions did not recuse himself from any uranian one investigation, and what he was saying there is number one, I can't tell you if there's an ongoing investigation, We're not allowed to tell you that. And number two, he said there's not enough basis to appoint a special counsel for Hillary. Now, I personally think, you know, in light of previous remark, it seemed it seemed that he had been saying he wouldn't deal with anything involving Clinton. My sources are strongly telling me that that's not the case. I want to know what you're hearing. I'm hearing exactly what you're hearing, Sean, and it's what I've been saying on your show over and over and over again. There there is no evidence that he's refused himself from Uranium one first off. Secondly, discussing that publicly would or would not reveal what they are doing within the Department of Justice right now, and I think would be very cautious. I bought this that before. This was the main reason why they went after former FBI Director Comy for talking about these investigations in such detail publicly. And I mean even to the point where we see a lot of the congressional members, you know, questioning Comey ability to make his own decisions on whether or not they should proceed with any kind of case against Hillary Clinton, which was not his place. In fact, it was it was it was supposed to be up to the Justice Department to make those decisions. And the FBI has to be impartial actors, not politicized whatsoever, just bring the facts before the Department of Justice and the like. But we know, but we know that didn't happen with James Comey, the James Comey exonerated Hillary Clinton. That James Comey changed the exoneration letter from the legal standard gross negligence to extreme carelessness for very specific reason. We know that he took the advice of Loretto Lynch and said it was a matter, not an investigation, even though he believed it was investigation. And it seems he didn't even do an investigation. That's true, and that's what's so frustrating. It's frustrating for both the public. It's more frustrating, believe it or not, for all of those FBI agents that were involved in this investigation, the people that were on the ground that we're doing all the hard work for their director to come out and make this decision and sidestep them and that's exactly what I've been told. They were sidesteps. But it doesn't mean that if they don't call a special counsel that this isn't being investigated. Remember this is going to be up to the Department of Justice. They're going to have prosecutors looking at this. The FBI is now involved in this. There's a new director, Director Ray, There's gonna be a lot of movement within the FBI. We don't know what's going to happen in the next few weeks. I've been hearing a lot of difference. I've been hearing that a lot of people whose names we even know are gonna be long gone. I've been hearing this same thing. So we may see possibly a new deputy director at the FBI being announced. And remember this, there's a large number and you brought this up earlier, shown there is a large number of investigations in two leaks. Well, those leaks came from somewhere, So they're looking at leaks within the FBI, they're looking at leaks in other departments, like within the Department of Justice, and what came out, who had information, who had accessed information such as Michael Flynn's name, would his name was Lee. And there's also of a lot of talk among sources that I've spoken to that people are even being questioned at the FBI, that they're asking people one by one, you know, what information did you have? I mean, there is a week an ongoing Reek investigation right now. Some of the deals with the stories that we're talking about with Hillary Clinton, and with other issues such as Mike Flynn and the Russia investigation, and there's other issues of leaks that deal with national security issues, leaks that went to the media that affect our national security. So there's a movement to clean house, but it's it's a process that's not always public and according to the sources, can be quite frustrating to the rest of us who want answers. Unbelievable. All right, let's talk about the Department of Justice. This all got started, as your article pointed out, because of congressional inquiries that went back I guess as early as July, and I guess from the perspective of somebody that has now watched the year's worth of Trump Russia nonsense, black Helicopter con spirait seed theories on the issue of Comey, on the issue of the email server, scandal on the on the issue of we now know Hillary and her campaign and the d n C she controlled, that they funded Fusion GPS to to put forward slanderous lies against against Donald Trump, and then we know on top. But we will have to wonder if that was the primary reason that a FISA warrant was given, which you first reported on, you know, however, many months ago, and whether or not it was used for any other warrants. And then of course the uranium one deal, and now we know a lot more about that. I'll ask about that in a second. Yeah, I mean, and how they're impacting everything in our society right now, and even solution Heinstein has come out and that we don't have any evidence of a direct collusion for any kind of collusion between the Trump administration. And all right, stay right there. We gotta take a break. We're getting a bad connection here. We'll try and get a reconnect with Sarah Carter, investigative reporter. Take a quick break. We'll come back more with Sarah Carter, and at the bottom of the hour, the one and only Burgess Owens will comment on g q's decision yes to nominate cop hater Colin Kaepernick. As their Citizen of the Year. And as we continue investigative report of Sarah Carter all right in two thousand and nine, about a year year and a half before the Uranium one deal was signed off on, we now know that the FBI director at the time, Robert Mueller, and we now know the Attorney General certainly knew that we had a FBI informant, somebody that had picked up that Vladimir Putin, the bad actor. Russians had literally made it to America, were committing crimes like bribery and extortion, and and kickbacks and money laundering and racketeering for the very purpose of getting a foothold in the uranium market. They didn't do anything to stop it. Not only that, while we have to import uranium because we don't have enough uranium as a country, the foundational materials for nuclear weapons, well, Vladimir Putin not only got it, but then of course then you got the money connections with the people involved in the deal, kicking back a million of the Clinton Foundation, doubling bill speaking phase, etcetera. As it relates to the Uranium one deal, how could Robert Muller investigate anything Russia or Rod Rosenstein for that matter, or any number of people when in fact they were involved and knew about what had happened here and did nothing to stop him. Well, of course, as enormous concern, They're right. I mean, people want a very impartial look at this, and I think that's why Representative Jordan and others are asking for a special counsel. They're saying, even inside the Deputy you know, Attorney General, is is somebody that was too closely connected to this case. We need some impartiality here, and maybe this is why they're pursuing a special counsel for this investigation. We know that the informant was not somebody that the FBI had too strong arm. That means he wasn't a bad guy that was doing something bad that they got to work for them. He was somebody that came to the Justice Department and said, look, I went to take this job and I was told I had to be a part of this scheme with the Russians. I don't want to do this. I'm reporting it to you because I feel, as an American citizen it's my duty to let you know what's going on here. And instead, of course, they wanted more information and they said, no, please stay inside, work for us, let us know what's going on. And they kept him there for four years. So he spent four years of his life undercover, basically turning information over to the FBI and the d o J with the hope, with the hope sewn that they would do something. And when it came down to it, when he saw the passage of uranium one by Sippius, there was a moment that I've spoken with his attorney and I you know, I've also met him myself. Through his attorney, he said, well, what is going on here? Why are they not using the information that I've been providing it. Does anybody on the Siffius board know what's going on? And the only answer, apparently that he got was just to ask your politics. It's politics. So that's very cool. Oh yeah, and that's going to come out how soon, Well before he testifies before Congress. Well, we're expecting it to happen soon. Um, certainly before at the end of the year, and there's not much of the year left, so there he will definitely be testifying before Congress before the end of the year. And I'm sure he's preparing um with his attorney for that, so there's gonna be a lot of revelations. He is a small piece of a very large puzzle, and I think that's why we just keep empathizing over and over again. There needs to be an investigation. Sarah Carter, investigator reporter. Thanks for being with us. This is really getting interesting, peeling away the layers of an onion. All right. When we come back, Burgess Owen, NFL Super Bowl champion, author of the book Liberalism Or How to Turn Good Men into Winer's Wienies and Whims, He's going to talk about g q's decision to nominate compiter Colin Koppernick as their Citizen of the Year. That's next. Eagles Malcolm Jenkins met with lawmakers to help the community. He went to Washington. Dolphin's Kenny Still has met with Miami police to talk about law enforcement and bridging the gap. That's the TI proproactive meetings, not saying there's no issues to be addressed, but go address the issues. Well, here's the thing. We have a chance to either serve or complain. We can demand or command. Uh we command a good out there and and and doing the heavy lifting. This guy Kaepnick has not done a thing, but complain. And now that's being quiet and as supposed to be a badge of honor. Now, now we stand up and you do articulate to self. You can you explain what you're all about and defend yourself. You don't sit there quietly behind the curtains la everybody else? Do you do to have you looking for you? All right? That was Burgess own on Fox and Friends this morning. Um, I see the news now. Monday Night football ratings near season low as the Panther Panthers beat the Dolphins last night and once again three Miami Dolphins took a knee during the playing of the National Land Cement an anthem, and once again the Florida NFL team came up short in prime time and the ratings will look at that now is just atrocious and all of which saw the week of you know now, week ten, Monday Night Football got a six point two and meet market results and that is extraordinarily low. And it's a decline of eighteen percent from the previous week's Monday Night Football as having a massive impact on the entire game and an entire feeling in the country about the NFL. It used to be America's favorite sport now according to polls, that would be baseball, joining us to discuss it, NFL Super Bowl champion, author of the brand new book Liberalism or How to Turn Good Men into Winners, Wienies and Whimps. Anyway, g Q made the decision to nominate cop heater and supporter of of a thug dictating murderer of Fidel Castro, Colin Kaepernick as their Citizen of the Year. Are you sorry? Good to see him? Sound good? Could be looking forward to it, you know, Um, I just come to absolutely love you more loved you as a player. How did you come up with the title Liberalism or how to Turn good Men into Winners, Weenies and Whimps? Well, first of all, I came from a different generation. My my folks were My dad was a proud veteran to come he served in the Philippines and my uncle's servant in Germany, and to the very last day they thought that was the greatest decision they've ever made. So I grew up in a in a country of black Americas who loved our country, believed in American dream and figured out we can overcome races by winning. I was coming home from DC one day. One night, I was hurting the three guys, three black attorneys complain about what's going on in our country. These guys who live in American dream and you get to discomplain about it. And I called in and get happened to get through, and I said, I just want to talk to your win or Weening and Webb and it was silence. What was the radio show? The radio show? And uh, did you tell them who you were? Yeah? I did, but it was silence And that was That was maybe ten years ago. So I figured I'd use that title because it was very appropriate. Well, you got everybody's attention, There's no doubt about it. Um, it is something to to for g Q to make a decision, you know. Look, everybody's entitled their opinion. Colin Kaepernick wants to refer to cops as pigs on his socks and wants to take a knee. Yes, I guess every right to do it. But they had a fell has all sorts of free speech restrictions. You you can't, you know, pretend you're shooting a bow and arrow after a touchdown. You can't tawn other players, you can't say what you want to the refs um. There's a lot of restrictions on free speech in the NFL, and that's what they're paying the price for because they unfortunately the NFL today that they're not the same guy as the Pete Rosel who serving the war, Al Davis who's just winning baby and just loved our country. It's a different leadership and I'm surprised that owners haven't gotten got He's got a guy who's a bureaucrat, he came out of college, went into the pros and now now asking for fifty million dollars. There's a different way of looking at manhood from those million dollars in a lifetime private jet. Yea, we have an attack on manhood. That to me is what the real conversation needs to be. We have a guy now who's now on the copy of other magazine who said this is the man of the year. That's not what black men do. That's not what men do. Men stand up, they man up, they look their God, they praised their country, and they go out and roll up the sleeves and go to work. They don't sit down and complain. They don't make means of dollars and then pay other people to do what they should be doing. We have right now. The question should be in our black community is what are we doing to protect our kids? These are black man, now, black men, what are you doing to make sure you Isn't it really everybody? It is everybody, But I will say this, my race has been attacked very, very long, over a hundred years now, so we are really you want to look at the prototype of where our country can be if we don't man up. This is what happens to our country. If we take away God, take away the man, take away that the family to think a man out of the family, and you take away the entrepreneurial spirit. We now have very wealthy, powerful men that are sitting down with white men asking them to handle the black problem that right there talks about what you say, I guess, is it because a lot of the players that have been taking anew or are our Black Americans? Or that's why I'm pointing to it. And again I'm from a perspective of coming from the black community, and you have to understand why I'm so passionate about this because I grew up in the community that was very proud, very patriotic, very enthopreneur, were very successful and we were told to go out and win. So I'm looking at respect for fifty years and where we are now. So I'm I'm a little bit more passionate maybe than most people are. I want answers, and I'm really tired of seeing our our our environment, urban city being killing fields. We're killing our babies, We're killing the hopes of out dreams of out of our of our young men were killing each other. At the same time, the people overre seeing it are being praised that this this great people, that it will love our race. Well, the truth is, if they're not doing the right things, that they're not coming to the right answers, need to look for other answers. And that's why my my thing is, let's be independent political independent. Let's vote for those guys who both for values, but for our values and principles first will win this fight. How bad do you think the damage is gonna be a long term to the NFL for what has now gone on two seasons, not just one. I made a statement, I think it's the sea change showing you know, we brought into the NFL in that aura because of the way we felt years and years ago we're now feeling differently. We now have people deciding, like myself, I have not looked at it any game this year, and it will not I'm not watching. And you know the thing is I might have next year. I'll probably have some other habits was happening our countries. We begin to reevaluate where we're putting out time and do we feel better not looking or do we feel better looking. This is a great moment the NFL to really stand up. And I said, if if it had been the right type of leadership. Instead of looking at social justice, we're looking at man up justice. Talk to these young men about what they can do with themselves with their power and wealth to change the community. No. One of the things that I always loved about the NFL, and I now I'm watching college football mall than I ever have is you see the best of the best. You know, two teams, the most gifted, talented athletes that work really hard to get chosen. You look at college football, college football, the talent level is amazing, and only maybe one or two guys on each college team will ever think about the NFL. That's how, that's how what an honor it is to make it into that elite level, and you'd watch these guys, the warriors on the field, they fight to win. You see the amazing talent. I just happened to be a big fan of a quarterback over the over the head, into the bread basket, diving in the end zone and win. I mean, there's nothing better than that, because you know, throwing all it's like you're spreading a needle, literally a needle. And and to me, the art of that, the skill of that is fascinating. And you know you watch somebody like like blocks of go burros grab it with one hand, pull it down or somebody like that's amazing, right well, you know, but then at the end, but then it was non political y, you know, it was there was no racing ball. It was America love to watch the best. And then after the game, oftentimes people on both sides get in the middle of the field they say a prayer, including even the refs, and it was like shaking each other's hand, banging each other's helmet. Great game, great, you know, fun time experienced of this weekend, there was one of those teary moments again like when I stand on the satelines back in the eighth days and I went down to see the University of Miami a hurricane. We played against the the Notre Dame. Are you guys number two? And well this is this one got me. After all the discussions were having, I saw Abbess the mascot running out with the flag and all these guys black and white following them, and then they all student on the salary with the hand of their hearts. And then about twenty five those guys ranting the end zone after the after the national anthem, get on the need instead of and they got up and they went out and kicked button. That is that was a big game. That they were on fire. It was a big game. But also if those guys can learn those lessons that they are learning right now. First of all, you appreciate what you are. And then you asked for help, and and and and and help with divine, asked for divine helped to get over whatever you getting over, and then get up and go to work. That is the message. Actually, we can have our kids from college to learn that. In New pro we'll have a whole different NFL. I just wish that. For example, we watched an unprecedented amount of shootings and murder in Chicago. I think all these and if the NFL got involved, if the players got involved, and they went into these communities and they said, we we can't kill each other here, you know, we we've got to do better than you know, fifty shootings on a weekend. You know, we we had the church shooting down in Texas, got all the news, but that same weekend in Chicago they had more shootings than what happened in Texas. Brian and the introductor, Brian listed a few young men that are actually going out in the community, and those people need to be highlighted. You see, Kapnick is doing nothing but complaining. He's making millions of dollars, and he's donated money to one group that supports a cop killer. How about this, how about he build a group, do give himself a group himself and do something. And this that's a that's a cop out. Donating money is a cop out. Go out and make it, roll up your sleeves going there and and talk to these guys and serve the community, and good things we're gonna happen. What are you doing with your life now, preacher? I have you know, I've been looking for twenty or thirty years for the right place. And I found something called One Hard Project, which is worked with young um young guys coming out of the juvenile system and helping to transition into the world world that is a lost population. It is working great. It's it's it's a passion for me. It's what I've been looking for. My dad and I talked about this for for decades. Uh, this is his passion and I'm abortioned to see it through. And that's where we're gonna get our kids back, because they're gonna grow up and man up and and and you're either going to get them there or it's over. And by the way, we lose a lot of these kids in first grade, and by the time they get to fifth grade, they're so far behind they're never gonna catch up that the educational system kills him. We're fighting an ideology shown and that's that's what I appreciate about what all you guys, all you guys that are actually standing up and manning up. We're fighting ideologists total against the Judeo Christian values. They're gonna try to demean and ban God, the family, then manhood. You take away manhood, then what's left. But a lot of people think manhood, they think macho, they think, you know, you gotta puff up your chest. That's not what you're talking about. No, the manhood to me is someone who's willing to sacrifice all. When he say I love you more than that, he means everything. He would willing to sacrifice everything. The family, this country is God to make that all survives. And it's actually just a person who just willing to serve everything. It's just it's it's all by service. And the greatest service should be the man in my in my the Wales brought up. The greatest service should be the man in the house. Oh boy, that makes you a sexist. You know, you're probably like met Romney for crying on a lot of want to hiring, want to hire women. Um so I recently had an opportunity. I was invited to Rikers Island. I don't think I'm ever going to be invited back. You know the story. So I go in there and I'm watching and there's a guy, very nice man, and he's a pastor and I'm watching him drone on and on, and the guys that are sitting there can't take it anymore. So I'm the next speaker. I just said to everybody, do you guys mind? There was a group over here of the family and they were watching, and I said, and then these guys were sitting in front of you. I said, every mind, if I turned them back to you, and if I talked to these guys directly, first thing, I said, I'm not gonna speak more than ten minutes. And the next thing I just started. I just I was real with him. I threw a lot of explotives out, and I'm like, Okay, you're gonna get out of here. Some of you gonna come back. Do you want to be the guy that comes back? Do you want to go out? Do you want to work? Do you want a house? Do you want a car? Do you want to build a family? Do you want to be successful? You want to be able to go to a nice restaurant? Do you want Do you want the simple freedom of going to Wendy's and getting a Wendy's quarter pounder? Do you want that? You want that because otherwise you're gonna be a blanking, blanking blank or you're a loser. And I said, he if my advice to all of you is get away from your stupid friends. And if I mean abandoning your family that is corrupt and and leading you in the world, get away from them, Go find a job somewhere. And then I told about all the jobs I did in my life, starting with washing dishes and and cooking, and buzzing tables and and waiting and and and laying tile and framing homes and doing roofing and painting and won't paper hanger. I did it all. I said, that's how you do it. And I don't think they're gonna invite me back because there were too many exposs something. But I thought that was real. I was trying to be real with them. What's really real with those young men and everybody else, and that's including those keys that are watching these the NFL today and watch these guys taking the is about hope. Now, our responsibility at the end of the day, is our life is about hope. Helping them. They have more more hope than when they when they had when we first met him, And those young men and these in the situations, these correction centers, they come out and they don't have no hope. They're looking around and there's no exact, no example. Then they look at a guy who's making means dollars a kaepnick and taking a knave because he's telling how doc America is. So it's gonna come down to, first of all, black conservatives standing up, getting in there ruling about sleeves. And let me just say this one thing about what I expect to white Americans. We need to make sure that the boot of the Democratic Party, the associates taking off the next of my race. You do that, and we can do the rest. At the end of they stop being letting. These people do nothing but profit off of our misery. And I look back and I see, uh. The latest is Star Parker. She she she's now called an ignorant by this uh re Republican. Republican. I know starwell, I like her a lot. And this is the problem. We have these white liberals who attack our women with no response, no accountability, and they feel emboldened by it. So she's telling he's talking about about the abortion, what's happening. He's calling her ignorant, and then he then expects her to to give give him an apology. And I will say to him, this is this Republican the Tennessee. Not only is he disrespectful, but I would also say he's a mess. He's what's the problem without community, and so we need to do something about that. All right, Burgess own NFL Super Bowl champion, his book Liberalism or How to Turn Good Men into Whiner's Winnies and Whims. Will put it up on Hannity dot com. Burgess, Scott, bless you. I of what you're doing. You are a voice of reason and hope in a very difficult time. God bless you. My friend was always in honor to see you can have that Super Bowl ring? Can I can I wear that for an hour? We will come back and we will continue Hannity tonight nine eastern on the Fox News channel. We'll continue. Alright, that's gonna wrap things up to today. Amazing Hannity. Tit all right. We're gonna illustrate like never before, all that is important in terms of why a special counsel would be needed, why there were crimes committed, what crimes were committed. We'll do the media's job. That's tonight, nine eastern Hannity, Fox News. We have representative Jim Jordan's representative Gates, Jay Sekulo, Peter Schweitzer, Sebastian Gorka, Sarah Carter, John Solomon, that's all Tonight, Nineties, Today, Blockbuster Hannity on the Fox News channel,