Let not your heart be troubled. You are listening to the Sean Hannity radio show podcast. All right, who's anonymous? Who is it? We need you know? There's a really dangerous, sick, ugly side to all this that nobody in the nobody in the media wants to talk about. Oh boy, Joe Biden, who can't control his temper. You can't go to a seven eleven or a dunkin Donuts unless you have a slide Indian or dunkin Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent? Am I not not chuckle? You got the first sort of a stream Atrican American who is artiiculate and bright particulate, right, clean, clean, bic guy clean. I mean, it's that's a story book tree letter word jobs. J O b s Joe whoopsie Daisy whoops. Well here's the latest Uncle Joe. Crazy Uncle Joe. You're a real beep. I need to kind of street vernacular for male genitalia. Let's put it's such a good guy. I want to take the president behind the school yard. I'll take him on, I'll fight him. Uh, which is a joke. Uh, tough guy, Joe Biden, good luck I hope he's running for president. Uh, that ought to be fun to watch. We have a lot of news today. We have four big stories that are now unfolding. There is a grand jury investigation into the deep state. All the issues we've been talking about confirmed today. Uh, it's all about to hit the fan. The President on the verge of releasing documents. That's gonna take the whole house of cards and blow it away. We've got all of that, We've got the anonymous and I'm gonna the danger of anonymous is much deeper than anybody is talking about in your news media, and we'll blow that out of the water. We have incredible economic news. Yeah, forty nine year low job blos claims and other great data that will share in the course of the program. A little rocket man fire and fury my buttons bigger than your button. Looks like Kim Jong un is now again responded to President Trump strength because he pulled the Secretary of State Mike Pompeo from a meeting that they were gonna have. And now a little rocket man says he wants to d nuclearize the Korean peninsula during President Trump's first term. Oh excuse me if you listen. You know this is this is part of the lie that was in this anonymous piece, which really you know, you look at that I am part of the resistance inside the Trump administration. Well, the person Mr Gutlass, Mrs Gutlass, whoever it happens to be, says, take foreign policy, President Trump shows a preference for autocrats and dictators like Vladimir Putin of Russia, North Korea's leader Kim Jong un o. K let's just take that one statement. Because this person that's not elected, that is not held accountable, that has no respect for the the democratic constitutional republic that we are, and things that they are smarter than you, the American people, that they're gonna take it upon themselves to be the resistance or if you look at some of the other terms against downright scary from my perspective on all of this. Um that now quote they're talking about in the Washington Times, sleeper cells have awoken inside the country. Sleeper cells what people that are active in trying to undermine uh an American president that was duly elected. Um, this is really scary. And there's lines in here that makes me wonder whether or not the Secret Service is gonna get involved in this, because I think they really do need to get involved in this. If you look at the quotes, you know, for example, after dismissing the use of the twenty five Amendment, the anonymous author goes on to say, what what is the line one way or another? So we will do what we can to steer the administration in the right direction until one way or another it's over one way or another? What does that mean one way or another? What does the other way mean? Uh, you're talking about elections. Are you talking about a threat to the president of the United States? Because I would think that the Secret Service now needs to get involved. What is one way or another? We'll remove him one way or another. Well, let's say somebody said it about me. We'll get him out one way or another. Let's say it about you know God. You know we've I've always said during the Obama here's nobody remembers. Nobody wants to remember. We've got to protect our president. Jason has a thousand tapes of me saying in a thousand different times, protect the president of the United States. Whether you agree, whether you disagree, doesn't matter. It's we the people, the people choose. I'm part of the resistance. Let's see one way or another. I don't know. I'm one of the resistance anyway. So the guy goes on or the woman goes on, whoever. It happens to be a preference for autocrats and dictators. The person that has put the toughest sanctions on Russia was not Barack Hussein Obama. It was Donald Trump. And literally, you know, the Russian economy is collapsing. Little Rocketman is back at the table because his economy is collapsing. The Iranian economy is in tatters now because the president has pulled out of that ridiculous deal that John carry is. You know that bragging about is the greatest things in slice bread. The Iran nuclear agree, I say this straight worldly is the strongest, most intrusive, most accountable nuclear agreement that we have anywhere on the planet. This administration is involved. I think I think the administration has made a terrible mistake. I think it's me. Yeah, okay, we'll drop a hundred and fifty billion dollars on the tarmac to a Ranium mullows. The chant death to America, Death to Israel, Burn our flag, burn the American flag. That's a really brilliant idea. Now as it relates to North Korea, what have we had so far since December? We're in the fall ex September. Remember we were having all those rockets being fired over Japan and Guam was threatened, the entire region was threatened. He talked about fire and fury and his button that he's gonna press and we're gonna get a nuclear weapon landing on the continental United States or somewhere else in the world. None of that is happening anymore. Well, that would mean that the president, because he was strong with Kim Jong we've gotten hostages returned. The remains of Americans that have been lying in North Korea since nineteen fifty three have been returned. You got Kim Jong un today talking about, oh we can we can now talk about de nuclearization of the entire Korean peninsula. One of his you know, launchpad areas or testing facilities has been taken down. Uh. And to me, well, that's all a good sign. Then we've got this person that's the literally is making the case. Although he was elected a Republican, the president shows little affinity for ideals long espoused by conservatives. I've been a conservative my whole life on radio. I know some people at one point or liberals and they become libertarians, then they become conservatives, then they've become liberals, and then they go with the wind. I've stayed consistent. You know the things let's see, is Donald Trump a conservative, conservative justices on the Supreme Court and conservative justices, originalist. He's proven that he is a conservative. The biggest tax cut in history. That's a conservative principle. Ending burdensome regulation, that's a conservative principle. Security on our boards, that's a conservative principle. Opening anwar that is something we conservatives have wanted forever. Building the pipelines, that's a conservative principle. Energy, all of the above, coal, fracking, drilling, all of it, even looking into new technology. That's a conservative principle. So you know, all of this garbage. This is written by an anti trumper, somebody that thinks that they are above the rest of the country. And there's a danger to this. What if this person, now it can be any number of people, hundreds of people. What if this person here's the president talking about a potential military action against the American foe is he gonna or here is she gonna undermine that or what if he they hear the president talking about sensitive intelligence information? Are we gonna put sources and methods in jeopardy? What if this? What if this person is being paid? What if this person doesn't even exist? You know, if you look at the New York Times and I know bookies are having a good time with us, They're they're putting on odds on anonymous White House officials. Anonymous White House officials could be anywhere. Washington Post refers to it as sleeper cells have awoken. What don't we refer we talk about sleeper cells? Well, terrorist sleeper cells. What does that mean? Sleeper cells? The resistance opposite? Why are you working in a white If you have the honor of working for this president and you want to serve your country, You're there to serve the country, not your own agenda. Not unelected, not unaccountable bureaucrats that feel that they are above This is like an unelected cabal. If there are a lot of sleeper cells, as they call them in the Washington Post, well, what does that mean that they're gonna awaken and take over the government and they're gonna have a coup? I mean it's insanity. What if this happened during Obama's term? Some conservatives stood up and said, wrote a letter to the think the New York Times would have printed it. I doubt it. And by the way, this is not The New York Times has caught been caught making up stories many times over the past years. But maybe it's only a ten percent chance. It's probably somebody that could be one of six seven people that fits under that title anyway, But you know, the New York Times has their m O. They've been caught making up stories many times over the years, and it's not insignificant stuff like the resistant fantasy that they're publishing. Does the name Jason Blair ring a bell to any of you? Two thousand three young New York Times writers so impressed the papers, then editor how Old Rains. Rains kept Blair on the payroll, even after he warned Blair that he was making crap up. Any of Blair's fraudulent reports ended up and The New York Times fromt page after an internal investigation. The New York Times reported on Blair's journalistic misdeeds in an unprecedented seven thousand word front page story in May of two thousand and three Times reporter who resigned leaves long trail of deception. New York Times has been wrong story called the affair the low point in their newspapers history. But anyway, they found an internal investigation, thirty six of seventy three national stories filed with the paper over a six month period marred with errors, false state lines, evidence of plagiarism. Executive director how Rains faulted for continuing a published player after the papers metro editor sent him a memo origining him to stop Jason from writing for The Times right now, but he didn't stop. Is anybody gonna believe a newspaper that continue to publish news after they discovered that he was printing false news? Fake news? You know a lot of people have talked about you know, people's memories are short here. I know your book. He's having a great time. Who's it? Who is it? Who is it? You understand though, that if it's national security issues, issues of war and peace, intelligence issues, sources and methods issues. Uh, this is a clear and present danger to the United States. And if The Washington Post is right, sleeper cells have awakened in the United States and they're all little spies within the Trump administration and make him look bad. We've got a big problem. No nation can govern under these circumstances. Now, I just want to just just stand and think for a minute. What does the president have to deal with every day national security issues, peace and prosperity, free world. If you're surrounded by snakes and backstabbers and people that are quote the resistance or sleeper cells, as the Washington Post says, um, and you've got enemies that are taping you inside of the White House, it is it is dangerous for the whole country. Hannity, you wouldn't feel this way if it was Barack Obama. Yeah, I would feel that way. Actually, just like when Barack Obama was president and said we've got to protect our president. Mr Speaker, you're gonna have strong feelings about this. We've now learned that this guy that broke into the White House, not only did he get in the door, but he knocked down a Secret Service agent, went into three different rooms of the White House and passed the stairs that would have gone right up to the residents of of the Obama's That is extraordinarily chilling to me. I mean, what you're talking about protecting the president of the United States of America. And it's just there's no room for error. You've got to protect our president that that represents the free world. So they've got a very difficult job. They've got to almost be perfect, and any time any incident happens. Uh lately it's becoming pretty high profile. And if we're not protecting our president, we're not protecting our leaders. We've got a big problem. The rest of the world is watching this. Oh I said that when Obama was president. I guess I'm pretty consistent on this. Whoop. See Daisy, how many times do you you you said you put a montage? He's got about a hundred. He's telling me, you protect your president, you protect your politicians, And this is just a really scary time that they're unelected, unaccountable people that have the honor and privilege and pleasure. And obviously, by the way, when they say and suggest he's not a conservative, they're lying. He is a conservative on judges, he's a conservative on healthcare, conservative on taxes, a conservative on repealing regulations, a conservative on energy, independence and immigration, conservative on even foreign policy issues. He doesn't support dictators. He's making the world safer. Are we alienating what are our friends by saying stop ripping us off with bad trade deals and negotiating better deals, that's good for the American people. It's like, it's good to say to NATO, stop making Putin rich and billion dollar deals with Putin for your energy supply and letting NATO pay their fair share when we're paying seventy plus cents of the bill. There's nothing bad about any of that, one way or another. Interesting alright to the top of the hour. Alright, so he had well, I think that John Cornyn, the Senator from Texas, had it right when uh, well he had the theatrics of Corey Booker during the cav A hearing is earlier today, and he's threatening to release documents that he says that they're hiding from the American people. And Corey Booker said running for president is not an excuse for violating the rules of the Senate. And he said, well, you can come after me. I know, I'll count me in on all of this little problem with Corey Booker and the Senate refusing to release the documents. Uh, they already released them. But anyway, why getting the way of great you know, a great, let me run for president and make my main name no known moment here it is. But if somebody's gon land those charges, I hope that they will follow through me and Senator Durban, Senator Coons, Senator white House, come get us. We're breaking the rules. Senator Corono, Senator Blueenthall, now Senator Feinstein Coste. I hope that they will bring charges against us, and I'm ready to accept the full responsive ability what I have done, consequences for what I am done, and I stand by the public's right to have access to this document and know this. Nominees views on issues are so profoundly important, like racing, the law, torture and other issues. Mr Chairman mayor may making you um may read the shouldn't rule that he goes on to read the rules which obviously come after me. Well, it turns out running for president is not an excuse for violating the rules of the sentence of one. It's bitsy teeny weeny little problem in all of this. Now. Booker, by the way, who we know has aspirations to be president like Camil Harris and some other people, is crazy. Uncle Joe called the guy a a you're a beep earlier today. WHOOPSI day, is he crazy? Uncle Joe is slipping away one? You know you can't go to a dunkan No, it's or uh seven eleven unless you have a slight Indian accent and talking about him by his clean he's articulate. Wow, unbelievable. Anyway, it turns out book presidential hopeful or at least an email. This is about the closest I'll probably ever have in my life to an I'm Spartacus moment. Sadly turns out the major problem for Mr Spartacus turns out that they cleared the documents already. They already been cleared, and this is all a bunch of nothing about nothing. Yeah, according to Bill Burk, who's the George W. Bush Records representatives that led the review of the kavan Or hearings and records, which they did in an expedited fashion, And we were surprised to learn about Mr Booker's actions this morning because we had already told him he could use the documents publicly, so we already knew this was a show for nothing. In fact, we have said yes every request made by Senate Democrats to make documents public. All of this drama this morning, apparent Lee for nothing except that he wants to run for president. There you go. It's all about how do I look, How do I look? How do I look? How do I sound? What do I appear to be? Strong? Tough? I'll take on that Donald Trump guy any day of the week. Um, we have a lot of deep state news, and this is now a really this is now getting to the We're about to have a major, major, massive breakthrough on the deep state. Let me put it that way. According to my sources. Well, Hannity, you say you're not a journalist, I'm not a journalist is defined by those idiots a bias liberal and the rest of the media. I'm a talk show host. Let me put it this way. So a journalist says they do news fair and balanced than objective. That's what they do news. If you're a talk show host, you kind of like the whole newspaper. Like we'll talk about Colin Kaepernick. We do some sports, we do news, we do local news, national news, regional news, international news. We do news. Now we do journalism. Sometimes we're just straight up all right, let me tell you what's happening today. This is what is in the news today, and we do opinion where the opinion page, where the news page. We even do investigative journalism. We've broken more stories on the deep State and the biggest abuse of power scandal in American history. And the rest of the media, you know, they're out there with their usual you know, oh, stormy, Stormy, Russia, Russia, Woodward Woodword, Michael Wolve, Michael Wolf, Michael Wolf, and Peach and Peach and peach um and s hole less, hoole less, hole less, hole less, and now we won't do it right now because we've got two months to get to So they're they're basically that. So they do they think they do journalism, but they're liars. They're really just opinion people posing as journalists and a bunch of sheep that weregurgitate the same nonsense. What we do on this program is we were like the entire newspaper, same on Hannity. We do journalism, We do news, we do straight news, we do opinion page news, we do controversial debates and subjects. Sometimes we do sports, and sometimes we even do gossip. We're the whole newspaper. So in that sense, I'm a talk show host, and that means, yeah, journalism is part of my job. Opinion page journalism is part of my job. Sports, sometimes calling Kaepernick it's part of my job. Sometimes we give opinion or just straight news. Sometimes we do investigative reporting a lot more than they do. That's all part of being a talk show host. That's what the definition is. We do it all. Fortunately, they can't do anything right. We'd like to think that we do their job better than they do on that part of our job. So let tell you what's happening. Even the Washington Post now jumping on the Hannity bandwagon, the Greg Jarrett, Sarah Carter, John Solomon, everybody's bandwagon they have now for months. We discovered today according to the Washington Post, there is a grand jury that has been summoned withnesses have been summoned. The headline is prosecutors use grand jury as investigation of Andrew McCabe intensifies. Joe Degenneva last night said that Rod Rosenstein was under investigation. It appears that everybody that signed the fraudulent fiser warrants plural original application, three subsequent applications, Well, that would be Comey, that would be Sally Yates, that would be Rod Rosenstein. That would be Andrew McCabe. They're all under investigation. Now you see, finally, maybe maybe we'll actually get to the truth. We're really going to get to the truth. That would also include Hillary Clinton. John Solomon is about to break a story tonight. Now we have been telling you all about the connections and the relationship. How after Bruce, after Christopher Steele was fired, he was fired for lying and leaking. Well, then Christopher Steel the conduit for him to the FBI then became Bruce Or seventy contacts, handwritten letters, text emails, meetings, they had them all. And now we know that that if you take it from the beginning, the Steel Or connection leads right to Robert Mueller's special counsel. Remember we learned we saw in the last couple of weeks the text message exchange, handwritten message exchange between Or and Steel. Oh are you passing it on? If you passed it on to your friends at the sc SC is special counsel. Now we know that Or and Steele Or funneling information to Andrew Weissman, who of course is Robert Mueller's pit poll. And where did all this information their funneling come from? So Hillary Clinton, let's go all the way back. First, they exonerate, they don't investigate. So she gets a pass to stay the preferred presidential candidate Struck and Paige and call me. They all hate Trump. Christopher Steele is on record hating Trump, so she gets a free pass that would have put all of us in jail. She continues her campaign. Hillary her campaign, and then the d n C they funnel money through a law firm Perkins Couheie. Well, that means that probably a campaign finance violation. Perkins Cooeye then hires the op research firm Fusion GPS. Russour's wife brusso Or, the fourth highest rankie member of the d o J works for Fusion GPS. Fusion GPS hires a fire foreign national, Christopher Steele x by m I six. I thought foreign nationals weren't supposed to impact American Allied actions. They did. Then Steele goes and puts together these phony dossier full of Russian lies and nothing but salacious rumors about Donald Trump, most of now which have been debunked. That information is used to lie to you, the American people, before you go vote. That's called propaganda. That's called misinformation, that's called distortion, that's called outright lying in order to impact the presidential election, and they're using Russian lies to do it. Then it gets worse because the bulk of information for the fives applications, there were four of them, the original application, the last subsequent application signed by Rod Rosenstein himself, Mr. Conflict, all of them use the bulk of information being the Steel dossier. Oh all four. Then it turns out that not only did they use it to spy in a Trump campaign associate, well, then all that information is now being funneled over to the Special Counsel Robert Mueller through their conduit Bruce or Now this is getting worse every day. So it's good that there's a grand jury investigating what is the biggest abuse of power scandal in American history. Here's where it's now all gonna get very interesting. The President now may, in fact, he classify the fies the documents that Congress has been requesting. Now, amongst such things that would include the missing pages and all the footnotes pages ten to twelve, pages seventeen to thirty four. I know the exact pages we're looking for. All the footnotes there are twelve specific bruce or three oh two's that would have been written about Christopher Steele. Apparently there's exculpatory information in them. And of course we have the so called Gang of Eight documents. That's the same binder of information that was brief to Congress this summer as a result of the subpoena, but they didn't release it. They don't want to release it. Where's or Booker when we need him? Maybe he'll fight to have him released. And then of course we've got this other bucket of information that probably includes things like, oh, exculpatory evidence as it relates to Carter Page that was purposefully withheld, or what they did to Papadopoulos that nobody knew in the Trump campaign. That's only a small part of it. And the fies a chord of proving the FBI's applications buy on the Trump campaign. They didn't all the single hearing, and there's no indication that any verification of the information that was was was a fiction novel that even Christopher Steel himself can't even stand by his own dossier. The FBI was paying him for part of this dossier work, as was Hillary Clinton, as was the d N c that's whose finances Hillary Clinton was in fact funding and controlling. So all this, he says, under the threat of perjury, I don't know. I mean, it's throw intelligence. What the hell I know? I can't say that I know that this is true. Well, then still the Steel hating you know, Steele, who hates Trump, is now back during his information to the Special Council, guy that lied and leaked. There's no evidence to back up any of this phony dossier, and he doesn't even stand by his own dossier. Judicial Watch has a report new FBI records revealed that Struck authored the initial draft of the call me letter. Whoopsie Daisy. That's because they took it out of the hands of the real FBI agents, the guys that we love and trust, the field agents that would have done their job. The first indication that things were going awry is when you take it out of the field office and you put it right in the hands of the upper echelon at the FBI and the d o J. That was a big deal. And of course I'm not so sure this story is true that the Bruce Or and Christopher Steele try to get that Russian oligarch, you know, to give us dirt on Trump or give them dirt on Trump. And that's Ole Derris potska uh that never turned out to be. You know, that's a big deal. Now. The question is now that it's right in the wheelhouse of Robert Mueller. And you've got a connection that that we now know Steal was feeding information of Bruce or who was feeding it too? Oh, Andrew Weisman. Is that the reason why all of a sudden that Robert Mueller may accept written answers from Donald Trump? Does he want to land the airplane and get this over with because it's looking really bad after the headline d o j's Bruce or kept Mueller deputy in the loop about the anti Trump dosier. That's Andrew Weiseman. You know, he's the guy that lost nine zero in the Supreme Court. He's the guy that got tens of thousands of Americans in the Enron case to lose their jar jobs at Anderson Accounting. He's the guy that put four innocent Meryal executives in jail for a year that was overturned by the Fifth Circuit. He's the guy that's leading a charge in all this Russian collusion about I'm sorry, loan applications from years gone by, tax returns from year has gone by. The big victory of Mueller comes from Andrew Weissman. How did this guy and Genie Ray, who was the lawyer for the Clinton Foundation get on Mueller's team. It's disgustingly corrupt. But I'm told that if this information comes out, these three O two's are released, this this gang of eight material is released, and yeah, the FISA warrants unredacted or released twenty plus pages, ten to twelve seventy thirty four. How do you know that, Hannity? Because I do journalism. I have sources, and my sources tell me information. That's what I do. That's my job. I know the media they're they're probably breathing about, you know, every day. It's something. Yeah, that's an Obama supporter justice. If we can accuse somebody of wrongdoing, we have to have admissible evidence and credible witnesses. We need to prepare to prove our case in court, and we have to fix our signature to the charging document. That's something that not everybody appreciates. There's a lot of talk about pies applications, and many people that I see talking about it seemed not to recognize what a FIES application. FIES application is actually a warrant, just like a search warrant. In order to get a FISA search warrant, you need an affidavit signed by a career federal law enforcement officer who swears that the information in the affidavit is true and correct to the best of his knowledge and belief. Uh. And that's the way we operate. And if it's wrong sometimes it is. If you find out there's anything incorrect in there, that person is going to face consequences. That person is gonna face consequences. Rob Rosenstein five months ago. Uh, gladual with us hour to Sean Hannity Show. Right down our toll free number. It's eight nine one, Shawn, if you want to be a part of the program. We have three big issues that are developing as it relates to Deep State Gate, Sarah Carter rightly pointing out that the President may declassify some twenty documents pages of documents, but also much more potentially could be released. That is the three O two's, the Group of eight details and and much more. We'll get to the details on that in a second. We have a breaking article even The Washington Post has to get in on the Hannity train, albeit eighteen months late, but they're pointing out the prosecutors are using our grand jury as we speak, as an investigation into Andrew McCabe, the second highest ranking FBI official. This is under James Comey is now intensifying here and apparently a grand jury has been summoned and they've summoned witnesses and the cases ongoing. And obviously I think that the issue of who signed fies A warrants that were never corroborated or verified and glaring omissions that dealt with politics. Uh, we're in each of the four fights A warrants. Interesting that Rod Rosenstein says, oh, you need a career law enforcement, you know, to the best of his knowledge, this has to be true. Well, the problem is that dossier was never true. Even Steele himself wouldn't stand by his own dossier. And we've got the mystery that is unfolding, which is okay, leading from Hillary Clinton right into the office of Special Counsel Robert Mueller. And it goes this way. It's Hillary and the d n C funneling money through a law firm. Law firm then transferring the money over to Fusion GPS and OP research firm could be a campaign violation. But putting that aside, they go out and hire Christopher Steele, foreign spy. He uses all his dubious sources, puts together this series of of of papers, if you will refer to as the dossier, then of course there are twelve separate bruce or three oh two's. I believe most of them dealing with Christopher Steele, if I'm not mistaken. Also, what we we we call or qualify as the Gang of Eight documents, that's the same binder information that was used to brief Congress this summer as a result of the subpoena of its subpoena, And of course then we've got other apparently operational plans and exculpatory information that also exists. Tell me what I'm missing. You're not missing a thing, Sean, And I think that that what what we don't know is what's going to be most explosive in those documents. Remember a few people have seen those documents. They are highly classified. They are not allowed to speak about it. But what we do know, what I know as journalists snooping around in Washington here with everything going on, is that these documents will be vital, that there will be information in them beyond what we already know that will be explosive and shocking, and that there was a fraud perpetuated on the court, on the highly secretive court that David Show knows so much about in he can talk on the legal side of that, but that there was a fraud perpetrated on the court, and that they withheld evidence from the court, exculpatory evidence. We've heard Devin Nouna say this to you on his show, The Chairman, and we know his committee has been fighting the stuth and nail. And now we look at Rosenstein's memo, right that the fight of the Rosenstein fights, that that was the last fight of renewal on Carter page. And here we have, you know, the Deputy Attorney General signing loss on a FIFO warrant on an American citizen. And he should have known, based on all of the previous renewals what was going on here, but he signed off on it anyways. And this is a guy that's supposed to be overseeing the Special Counsel and Robert Mueller and you said right on today, McCabe then newses out. We've been talking about it for months. That is a grand jury investigation into this, and I'm telling you it's much deeper than Jess McCabe lying. This is a grand jury investigation into everything that has been going on, and that's what the Inspector General, Michael Horowitz is looking at. I know that he has been convened this grand jury, but we can definitely look at Prosecutor Huber for this, John Huber and others. Remember Jeff Sessions said the Attorney General said that they would be looking into this, and this is what Michael Horowitz made, this criminal referral to the Department of Justice. We know there's a lot of other cases that they said they would be bringing for us to the d o J. I mean, there's been a lot of criminal referrals. I remember when Congressman to Sciantists had made a number of referrals to the Department of Justice. But this is the first time that we see that a grand jury that they are investigating. And Cabe is a central player all of this, and so is Andrew Weissman, who is on Robert Mueller's Special counsel, who was in communication with Bruce or consistently through two thousand and sixteen before he ever joined the Special Counsel. So there's gonna be a lot of questions here. They're gonna be I believe, a lot of answers in the near future. But the most important thing that President Trump, and hopefully he does, as sources have been saying, declassifies this information. He needs to declassify the face information that's being requested. We need the brute or three O twos, and we certainly need um the Gang of Eight binder, the document that a few people were able to review with the Gang of Eight. Remember they kept out the Congressional investigators from that meeting. They did not want them looking at it. And what I was told is during that meeting they never even bothered to open up that binder because everybody was fighting back and forth. So, um, those are the three main chunks of documents that they're going to need. Unbelievable. Uh, let me bring in David Shown and get your If a grand jury is convened, well you know the old saying, you can then die to ham sandwich. But there seems to be a lot of meat on the bone here. And if that grand jury is in fact convened. And I got to imagine now that the Washington Post is, you know, nearly two years late to catch up with the Hannity Show, but they they now see the severity I think, and I try and play catch up right in Indica, Ham Sandwich, but you have to want to. You know, there's been a referral now on from the RG and then through Mr Sessions to two different U S Attorneys from two different districts, plus the U. S Attorney in the district District of Columbia. We've asked the question on the show, what's happening with those referrals? Why haven't we seen anything, any action in and now we are. Sarah Carter's report on all of these subjects, but especially on this decent classification issue, is fascinating and vitally important. Let me say this, um, you know, I have in front of me two letters from Judge Collier, the presiding judge of the FISA Court, dated two team one to Congressman good Lad, one to Congressman NOONEZ. They're copied to Congressman n Adler, ship Mr Sessions, Mrs be And here's what the fires of Court says. The aiding Judge and his declassification issue. Because by the way, you have all of these so called scholars and pundits and people passing the journalist saying, oh, the president can't do this, he doesn't have the authority. Well, he has the authority. And what Judge Collier says is the size. The Court does not object to any decision of the executive Branch to release any size materials to Congress. She also writes the executive Branch has great interests in national security and to maintain the intention of any ongoing law enforcement investigations. Therefore, Justice Department has the right to release the documents, but the authority rest in the executive This is what Article two is about. You know, last point of the president has the ability and the power to unredact all this information. And let me just shift to Sarah. If he does that, Sarah, you know my sources say, and I hate when I hear this from Washington because they always disappoint they always overplay their hand a bit. But I'm told over and all where it will be devastating an exculpatory to the president, and the whole house of cards can come tumbling down. Now I believe that is absolutely true. And why do I believe this, Sean, because this was such a gross violation already, the information that we have already shows such a gross violation and fraud perpetrated on the court. It's a growth violation of our constitutional rights. I mean, this was this was spying on an American, not just an American. They spied on this American because they were connected to the Trump campaign. That means they were collecting not just the information on Carter Page. It's not like they're just listening to him. They're listening to everybody that Carter Page is speaking to. And guess what they're listening to everybody those people's conversations with other people. So it's secondary and tertiary conversations. This is why this is so important. You know, we are there has to be a reason, There has to be reasonable evidence that could lead the government to spy on you, to listen into your private phone conversations. Um, we have to ask ourselves how many more people did this happen to? This is just what we know about. We just know about Carter Page. This is one of many. Because remember we forget that all of this started with us, Sean, way back when when we were uncovering story after story on the unmaskings of Americans, and like Samantha Power unmasking let's see almost at a rate of one a day, and increase on the masking of Americans. Oh, in the election year, you mean that, that mean exactly? That's what I mean exactly, Sean. And because we've been so inuentated with so much news, and because we're just so swamped with all of this breaking news and new layers of the onion, we forget where we started. Where, what has happened with that investigation? What have they been doing to find out? Why I was? Why was the UN ambassadors? Then? Why was Misspowers? I'm asking over three people towards the end of her tenure. Let me bring David back in. Oh, that's all. These are all issues that we're gonna return to at some point. But you're right, there's been so much breaking news and so many other new aspects of this to follow. I didn't mean to interrupt you, David, but I just wanted to get to how serious this information would be if the President doesn't unredax this information, which he apparently might do. He said it now. Uh, In at least two instances that I know, of right, and Sarah's reporting this is simtilating, frankly, what I'm looking for. Next to his interview with Senator Corey Booker demanding that these things be declassified and published on the internet because after all, he's in favorite you mean, the Little Grandstanding episode today and it had turned out, it had turned out, by the way, that that had been released, the very thing that he was saying wasn't released that he was willing to go to jail over. Yeah, that was already that was already released publicly, Thank you very much. Here's what's Here's what's so troubling to me. I think, you know, I carry every place I go a copy of the Constitution with me. I even uploaded the most recent version because I think it's changed somehow. There seems to now be for all of these scholars and journalists and a mother investigation exception the articles authority, article to vest authority and the executive branch and spells it out the Department of Justice is part of an executive branch. All of a sudden, since the Muther investigations are going on, it seems that the executive doesn't have the authority anymore to determine who's going to be the head of the Justice Department. It doesn't have the authority. Now we're told maybe to declassify documents that the five the Court felt has said the executive branch has the greatest interest in and has the authority to release. So I haven't been able to find the Mueller exception in my copy of the Constitution, and I really would challenge some of these folks to tell me where it is. No, I think it's a great point. All right, quick break, we'll come back more with Sarah Carter and David shown on the other side than Andy McCarthy at the bottom of this next half hour. As we continue with Sarah Carter and David Shone, what do you make you know? In the middle of all of this with the President, we now have Mueller saying, oh, we might just accept the idea that we can get written answers, and it's only on the Russia, not on obstruction. Why do I believe now that Bruce or which we now know has been the conduit the back channel to Christopher Steele, and that Christopher Steele is talking about passing on and apparently has successfully passed on information to Andrew Weissman, who is Mueller's pitbull and number one at the Special Counsel's office. And there's even handwritten notes that mentioned this at this point, Now that the phony Clinton bought and paid for Russian lies are directly being fed from a guy that lied and a guy that won't even stand by his dossier. Is Robert Mueller feeling the heat of hiring people like Weisseman and Jeannie Ray Sarah Carter? Oh yes, Oh yes, he's feeling the heat. And he's worried about his legacy. And look, he's got a couple of chinks in his belt, but they're not really that worthy. They have nothing to do with Russian collusion or Russian involvement with the Trump campaign. Do you think he wants to end this? Okay? I think he wants to wrap If he's a smart man, he wants to wrap this up quickly. He knows he's not gonna find is he gonna Is he gonna write a roadmap to impeachment for Democrats for if they win the House in sixty one days. I don't know if he'll be able to do that. I don't know if he'll be able to do that. Remember, because it's going to be challenged in the courts whether or not. You know, there's certain things that may prohibit him from doing that. But I think what's happened here is that he's seeing the forest through the trees now and we've got all of this information coming out on Bruce Or And how can he even go after the president on obstruction when Rod Rosenstein himself, who's the deputy A g was the one that wrote the letter originally asking the President to fire Comy. I gotta run only because amount of time. We'll have a lot more and John Solomon has more on the Steel Or and yeah, special counsel Mueller office connection that is gonna blow this wide open. But if the President does, in fact under dack all those information, it's gonna be a game changer, There's no doubt about it. Sarah, thank you, David Shown, thank you. Eight hundred nine for one, Shawn or toll free telephone number. We'll take a quick break. We'll come back Andy McCarthy at the bottom of this half hour and much more straight ahead alright, twenty five to the top of the hour. Or toll free telephone number is eight nine one Shawn. If you want to be a part of the program. A lot of breaking news as it relates to the deep state. It's getting deeper and deeper now, and it looks like many of the indictments that we've been wondering if and when they're possibly coming of some of these deep state actors. Was Washington Post report finally they're getting on the Hannity train. They're only eighteen months late, but reports the headline as prosecutors use grand jury as investigation of Andrew McCabe in ten sufies. Many of us have been wondering, well, how is it possible that we know crimes and frauds were committed against the FISA court and judges. How is it possible that nobody gets indicted for that. There's FBI protocol involved, there's the FISAL law itself that is involved. And I don't know anybody that gets away with committing a fraud upon a court. Now, if you really take it, it starts with Hillary and the d n C paying a law firm, which, by the way, it could be a campaign finance violation. If we're if we're worried about people putting out false statements on loan applications from years gone, by then, you would think that this would then be a big issue. Item seven and eight in the Cone Pleague deal, you know, dealt with campaign finance issues. But Hillary Clinton and d n C money goes to a law firm, goes down as a law expense, but then gets funnel to an odd research firm. They hire a foreign national And I thought foreign nationals weren't opposed to impact our elections. But in fact, Christopher Steele that gets Russian phony sources solaceous details about Donald Trump. Not only was it used uh to to perpetuate lies and distortions and misinformation against the American people in the lead up to an election to impact how people vote, but then it was used as the bulk of information presented to the Feiser Court judge, and not only its original application, but three subsequent applications. We also have a story that is breaking from John Solomon tonight that Bruce or trying to influence the investigation. It actually began in August before the election in two while his wife Nellie was working at Fusion GPS on the research on Donald Trump. Or get this, met Steele then met with McCabe page and Struck and by the way, that might be the insurance policy that we were all wondering, what does that mean? Will stop him? We have That's when the insurance policy kicks in. And also the FBI pivoted from Papadopoulos switched their focus to Steal because of information that Or had. We know seventy contacts with steal an Ore and then we've learned that that steal an Or in part of their contacts are saying, well, did you get the information to the sc yes sees, the special counsel And the answer to that question is yes, they did to Robert Mueller's pit bull, Andrew Weiseman. And Andrew Weisman was getting Steel information. The problem with Steal's information is in an interrogatory in a court case in Great Britain, under a threat of perjury, Christopher Steel didn't stand by his own dossier. I don't know if it's true. This is just raw intelligence, maybe fifty fifty Well, that was the information used to secure FISA warrants and to propaganda. Is the American people in a lead up to an election anyway? What does this all mean? There's only one guy that can sort this out legally for US. Fox News contributor also a columnist. He's been phenomenal on all of these deep state issues for National Review. He also uh is uh well prestigious attorney in his own right, working for the Southern District of New York for somewhat twenty years, and he worked on the World Trade Center bombing case, the First Trade Center bombing, and then of course the Blind Shade case and other cases involving terrorism. And uh former assistant U S Attorney from the Southern District of New York, Andy McCarthy is with us. How are you. I'm doing great, shown except that, uh, when you so nicely summarize my Southern District experience, it reminds me that this year is the anniversary of the World Trade Center bombing. So no, Dave, this was the first Trade Center bombing and you've got convictions in that case. Sure did you know that? I mean, this is when the work of real prosecutors and FBI officials. We can't thank them enough, you know, Andy, I gotta tell I don't like being on the side of having to talk about um a few bad apples in the FBI and Department of Justice. That's not who I am, you know, I'm not. I'm my dad was a family corp probation guy. My mom was a prison guard for twenty five years. My family was all cops and fironmen and everything else. Yeah, I Suan, I agree with you about that. But I really think that those of us who really care about law enforcement, uh, just like those of us who care about anything else. If you if you really care about something, the best disinfected for and is is to you know, identify what went wrong and make sure it doesn't happen again. And that's what we're trying to do here. And it's not the rank and file. I mean if you look at, for example, the Clinton email investigation, it was taken out of the field offices of the f BEHIND, which is highly unusual to turn out. Yeah, that's that's going to turn out to be. I think when the history of this is finally written, UM, one of the big things that should have been a blazing red signal that something was wrong here is that the FBI and the Justice Department, but the FBI in particular, always wants investigations handled at the field office level throughout the country rather than Washington, precisely to give the investigators some insulation from the political environment of Washington, and these investigations were run out of headquarters, which is highly highly unusual, into my mind, highly inappropriate, because headquarters is supposed to exist so that it can kind of oversee and be removed and objective about investigations. When you're conducting an investigation, you can't have that mindset. But you've never heard in all your years that you serve the Southern District of New York, which is probably the most prestigious U. S. Attorney's office in the country. And I'm not saying that to flatter you. It's just a fact. They're great at what they do. Um. And they have done really big, big important cases that have kept this country safe. So I have great respect for the people that work there, really used to work there. Um. But my question to you is, have you ever heard of an investigation an exoneration letter written months before they even talked to the main people involved in the case. Sean, we don't do exoneration letters in the Justice Department. You can even start with that regular Well, no, listen, I mean it's this is an important thing because you when you close an investigation, first of all, investigations is supposed to be done under the radar to begin with um. But when you close an investigation, you don't issue a letter ordinarily or make a public statement that an investigation has been closed, because a lot of times the reason you're close an investigation is you end up thinking, well, the guy probably did it, but we don't have enough evidence to prove it in court, which means if you get one other piece of evidence, so one other witnesses comes forward, all of a sudden you have a case where the day before you didn't have a case, and then you're rolling again. So there's no reason to come out and make a statement if you don't. You know, the government should only speak in court when it's formally ready to file charges and when somebody who gets charged has all the due process rights that the system gives you. Other than that, the government's supposed to keep its big old mouth shut. But in all but based on all objectivity, if I did the things that Hillary did, as it relates to the email server itself, what we found on the email server that we know that we've found classified top secret information, and then I went about the effort of the leading subpoena emails and or having age do it, and then of course bleach bit and then busting up devices. I don't think I'd get away with it, Andy, even if I hired you in Dershowitz and Levine and every other great attorney Greg Jarrett to help me. No, you wouldn't. In fact, before you ever got to the classified information Sewan, which is kind of a complicated charge, although I think it's a slam dunk charge on her. The fact that these documents were destroyed and the fact that that was done when a satina was issued, you wouldn't even get out of the blocks on that. Do you remember when I said, do you remember when I said, hypothetically when it was a news article that Robert Muller wanted the phones and devices of everybody that had testified. And I'm like, well, if if I said, if I ever said to them to do everything she did, if I said, it's not gonna work out well. But if I said it, and the media went nuts saying Hannity is telling people to obstruct justice, and I'm like, just the opposite. I was saying, don't do it, but as if you do, it's not gonna work out well. And I actually use those words. Yeah, they're they're much interested, much more interested in something that they can twist into obstruction to justice than the actual obstruction of justice them right in the face. All right, Quick break more with Andy McCarthy, Fox News contributor, columnists n Rrow and former assistant U S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Right and McCarthy with us former U S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Fox News contributor n R O H Editor and columnist. Let me ask you this, Um, then we have the issue of PISA. If you look at the people that signed off on the FISA applications and that, as far as we know, the last one, meaning the third renewal, but the fourth one issued would be Rod rosen Stein, then you have Sally Yates signing off, and we believe James Comey and Andrew McCabe. Um, we now know that the information, not only that they presented, the bulk of the information to obtain the warrant was the Steel dossier. He doesn't stand by his own dossier. We know that there's certain omissions that they didn't things they didn't tell the court. I would argue lie by omission that Hillary had bought and paid for it. That was a fact that they had known and and all of the questions surrounding it. They knew it was circular reporting as it relates to Michael Izakov's article, because he was fed the information from Steele. Steele was also fired and let go. And I don't think they still they still vouch for the guy. They had paid him eleven months. Um are those people in legal jeopardy? Well, they're potentially in legal jeopardy, But you know, it's important to recognize that there's a difference between flatly lying to a court, which is certainly a felony, and then either omitting to provide information that should have been provided, or asserting information that hasn't been verified but that you don't You can't say is false, but you really can't say it's true either. Those are in the nature shawn of of abusive power that could be prosecutable. But I think, more importantly should be a basis for removing people from there. Would they have to show that some effort was made to verify independently and corroborate independently. Let me play words from Rob Rosenstein back in May. The way we operate in the Department of Justice if we're can accuse somebody of wrongdoing, we have to have admissible evidence and credible witnesses. We need to prepare to prove our case in court, and we have to fix our signature to the charging document. That's something that not everybody appreciates. There's a lot of talk about FISA applications, and many people that I see talking about it seemed not to recognize what a FIES application. FIES application is actually a warrant, just like a search warrant. In order to get a FISA search warrant, you need an affidavit signed by a career federal law enforcement officer who swears that the information in the affidavit is true and correct to the best of his knowledge and belief. Uh. And that's the way we operate. And if it's wrong sometimes it is. If you find out there's anything incorrect in there, that person is going to face consequences. It's wrong, Those people are gonna face consequences. Uh. If the information we you know, we're swearing the information is true and correct. Don't we need to know now? Wouldn't there be and uh, some type of record of any effort that was made to verify or corroborate the Steal dossier. And if there was no effort made whatsoever, and this was a guy they fired for lying and disseminating information of the media, wouldn't that then therefore be a reckless disregard for their job and more importantly, that they committed a fraud on the court, perhaps even knowingly. Well Sean, I think the record that we have is actually worse than that. The record we have, according to mccage's testimony to the House Committee, the Devin Noon ass Committee, is that they did make extensive efforts to corroborate and they weren't able to corroborate it. So they want sheerly on uh Steal's own reputation with them under circumstances. Where As you've outlined, Steel himself didn't claim that this stuff was true. He said it was raw intelligence that needed to be investigated and verified. Now, as far as Rosenstein is concerned, I think that the clip that you played number one, he's he's right when he says that there's consequences. They may not be consequences in the nature of an indictment. They could be administrative consequences up to being fired requirement. But but Rosenstein's remarks there are very self serving, Sean, because what what he knows is that he signed off on the last warrant. And what I think he's trying to say there is, if I did that, I relied on a career agent, and that's why you want to forgive me for signing off on this thing that turns out not to have been verified. What usually happens in a court case is that a defendant can get the warrant suppressed, can get all the evidence suppressed. It doesn't mean the agent ends up going to jail over that, but the agent could get fired over it. Well, it's gonna be interesting to see. I think if I with purposefully withheld exculpatory or important information to a judge, I don't know, Andy, I think that I have. I live in a life. You know, it's like, well, what do we learn from the Michael cole manaphort cases. Pay of taxes? I've always told my my accountants pay more. Uh, don't lie on loan applications is never gonna work out. Well, you know certain things you don't do in life. One of them is you don't lie to a judge or withhold information from a judge, but I've got to run. You've been tremendous on all of this, are good friend, Andy McCarthy, thanks for being with us. All Right, News round Up, Information Overload Hour. You know, I've explained many times on both radio and TV that the media in this country, there they are the willing accomplices, basically the propaganda arm of all things Liberals, socialist, demo, cradit Party, And it doesn't matter. They wake up every morning with a hatred, a contempt for the president. I use the analogy They're like a bunch of drug addicts and their drug is Trump hate, and they feed off Trump hate. And every day we go from crisis to crisis to crisis, the crisis, the crisis, the crisis, the crisis, and they fixate like the sheep that they are. And literally, it doesn't matter if it's Rush or Rush or Russia, Stormy Stormy Stormy. Uh, it doesn't matter if it's Michael Wolf, Michael Wolf, Bob Woodword, Bob Bob Woodward, Bob Woodword, Bob Woodward, Mr Anonymous, Anonymous, Anonymous, Anonymous New York Times. They just they cannot control themselves. Just listen, it's anonymous. Then in a stunning new op ed in the New York Times. Now this op ed in the New York Times, written anonymously, It's an anonymous op ed. An anonymous person. The senior official has written an anonymous op ed. It's anonymous op ed, an unprecedented op ed from an unnamed current Trump administration official. An anonymous op ed who wrote this anonymously. It's anonymous and anonymous anonymous op ed. Bob Woodward's explosive new book, Fear Undeniably Gripping the White House all talking to Bob Woodword. This book from Bob Woodward. According to Woodwords reporting, Bob wood would word would worry, Bob Woodword wood Word, Woodword, Bob would work. Bob Woodword is really a full court press to try to push back against Bob Woodwords book, the Bob Woodword Book, Bob would Word, Bob Woodwork, Bob Woodword, Bob Woodwork. Then we read it in the Bob Woodword Book, a dizzy twenty four hours in the Russia Investigation, Russia ran Russia, Russian, Russians, Rushi, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russians, Russian government. So Donald Trump has turned the Oval Office. Hope Bowler's built this country a hundred and ten years ago. Comments whole countries who hold cold cold hol house? Do you think these countries are? Every hour that passes, we get more from Michael Wolfe. I read this book and we're going to talk about it. This book Fire and Ferry, Michael Wolfe, author, Michael wolf Michael Wolfe, Michael Wolfe his new book Wolf Michael Wolfe. The Stormy Saga takes a dramatic turn. Stormy Daniels, storm st Me Daniels, Stormy Daniel, Stormy Daniels, Stormy Daniel, Stormy Daniel, Story Daniels. He said, she said, between the Presider and almar Rosa Rosa ma Amrosa Amarosas amar Rosa Rosa, Omar Rossa, Managalt Newman, Amarosa Rosa Rosa Managualt Newman. The likely of impeachment. I'm not saying it's high necessarily, but it certainly went up. Is itself an impeachable offense? Consider something as serious as impeachment, impeachment, impeachment, impeachment, dempeachment, impeachment, impeachment, peachman and peach, peachment, impeachment, impeachment and peachrompeachment. All right, Joining us now to disgust, we have Jonathan Gillum, author of the newly released book Sheep No More, That's the media sheep still Uh, and Daniel mcglacula, an attorney and constitutional expert. How are you welcome both to the program? Uh? You never hear the litany of success of the president. Ever, You never hear a single thing like, for example, we have news out today, Oh, a forty nine year record low in terms of applications for unemployment. Why would we ever want to talk about something like that, a jobless claims forty nine year low? Why would we ever want to discuss something as important as that when we can obsess about anonymous? Anonymous? Anonymous? Oh? And basically it's somebody that is trying to cowardly undercut the president, which puts uh the presidency in jeopardy. Uh. What if this person is hearing the president talk about war or intelligence or plans for war, and that this person is openly trying to undermine the duly elected president because they think they know better than the American people, and they think they'll take it upon themselves to be president on their own without any accountability. To the electorate that put the real president in office. Danielle. Hey, Sean, how are you doing? Hey, Jonathan. You know, I do agree with you that this anonymous New York Times our head is somewhat cowardly. Maybe for different reasons than you, But if you have a problem with the president, and I think you should put your name to it, and you should be willing to rest your job. I think it leads um people who are possibly trying to do their best under the circumstances, open to attack UM. And I think people are not going to believe this person necessarily as it relates to economic news. Yes, jobless claims Louis have been. It's incredible good news, but I think that we need to be able to walk into goun. At the same time, I think the Kavanar hearings are taking up a lot of the airwaves. Um that I do agree that a lot of these economic successes and maybe not played off as much as they should be. On the other hand, no, they're never They're never talked about because the media like the sheep that they are forget about cheap no more. They live in this bubble and they literally need they wake up in the morning they open their eyes, how can I hate Donald Trump today? And if they can't get a tweet or if they can't latch onto something from one of their other colleagues, because they all sort of circulate in the same circles and they just regurgitate what everyone else says. Uh, then they just they sort of break out in the sweats and they're like addicts and they need a fix, and they're praying and hoping that Donald Trump says or does something that they can hate, you know, with the intensity that I've never seen before in the history of politics in my thirty years of covering this. Uh, my good friend Jonathan, you know, Sean, it's um, there's a good side to this, and I'll tell you what the what the upside is is that these people I've been saying this ever since the election, these people are exposing themselves and they're exposing their relationships and they're exposing their agenda. And I think, you know, whether we're talking about the way seeing and in runs things Jake Tapper out there, um full of opinions on Twitter and things like that, when he's you know, putting himself up there as this reporter who's a fact based driven reporter people like that. Whether we're talking about the Colin Kaepernick ad with Nike, I think what we see in these people is that they have in the case of Nike, they budgeted for these commercials and for the loss, and the case of seeing Inn, they they have. They don't really care what you and I think anymore. What they're doing is they're going all out with their message with with this quote unquote resistance and an organized fashion. And that's what people need to realize. They're organized and they are pushing forward on their agenda and right now their agenda is to continue what Obama was doing, which was moving their socialistic, communistic ideology forward, and Trump stepped in the middle of that. If they did a show there was nothing but about what Trump has done, right, people would be blown away by this. On the left, they'll never do that. And so what you see is an organized push that's going forward. And the upside, like I said, is that they're all exposed. You know they're not. But here's the thing. They will obsessively cover quote anonymous, which it could be hundreds of people. There's there's no telling who this might be. But yet they don't cover us jobless claims fall to a forty nine year low last week. We have the FED in Atlanta. They're forecasting right now four point seven percent GDP growth for the third quarter. Trump scoring a major budget breakthrough, and literally they're gonna write pass spending bills and and broken the federal budget log jam which was decades worth, the growing deficits. And they're actually gonna do the spending bills the way they're legally supposed to, and that's department by department rather than one big, massive packets. That's a big deal by any objective analysis. Then I can give you the list of accomplished. It's four million fewer Americans on food stamps, four million new jobs, created, the greatest growth in manufacturing jobs in thirty years in America. We have consumer confidence all time high. Everything's happening that's good for the country. You never hear about any of it from your side, your friends, your Democratic buddies. Daniel, You know what, there's also plenty that's not good that needs to be talked to. That we have children in cages in the southern border. Right, Okay, excuse me, let me let me correct the record. Because the person that stopped the practice that went on during the Obama years would be Donald J. Trump. So if you're going to talk about the separation of family issues, let's talk about under Obama and George W. Bush, because it happened under them too. And when then one it was brought to the attention of the president, the president fixed the problem something nobody else before him did. You could say, you could say thank you, President Trump. Go ahead. As of today, the Trump organized as the Trump Excusing Organization, listened to me. The Trump administration decided it was going to a nor a n court order and it was going to hold women and children and basically in prison indefinitely until their asylum planes are held. It's good a families are now being kicked together, but they're still about five kids who are either Okay, let me repeat, I didn't hear you once during the the person that's stepped up and honestly, what he did was kind of unconstitutional, if you want to know the truth, because he's defying what his federal law. But he did it because it was the right thing to do. Because Congress can't get off their lazy asses and go do their job. So we're gonna be blunt and honest let's tell the whole truth. But it was an interesting diversion away from all of the success economically and otherwise of the president for you to do this. As we continue with Jonathan Gillum and Danielle McLaughlin, let me go to this Colin Kaepernick ad that is gonna be running during some NFL games. I guess this weekend, and uh, actually whenever they're whenever they're gonna be running them, I'm not gonna be watching because Saturday is my football day. Now. I'm just not interested in a more sick and tired of all of it. But anyway, Colin Kaepernick, the face of Nike, just do it. Thirty years in. I don't believe you have to be like anybody to be somebody. If you're born or refugee, don't let it stop you from playing sock for the national season at age sixteen. Don't become the best basketball player on the planet. Be bigger than basketball. Believe in something, even if it means sacrificing everything. Let me ask you, Danielle, So there's a guy that had socks depicting police officers as pigs. Would you pick him to be the face of your company? The representative of your company. I'll say this that I didn't say do. I ask you if it's controversial. I asked, if you owned a company like Nike, would you pick Colin Kaepernick, who wears cops socks depicted as pigs, as your as as your representative? Yes? Or no? Maybe I would, because you know what, wearing socks one time does not make a man president some terrible things about women. Why do you have to turn everything into Trump? Nike's paying calling Kaepernick? By the way, do you know what calling Kaepernick's record was the last two years in his NFL career. I'm not three and sixteen. He went one and eleven. Now do you think that sounds like a good NFL quarterback with that type of record? Well, you know we're going to find out, because he just want to motion to the Smiths and we're gonna get all the discovery to figure out with the NFL. I didn't ask you, does that sound like a quarterback if you're an NFL owner, that you want on your team? Okay, Well, if you wouldn't want him on you, if you wouldn't want him on your team, maybe the owners decided they don't want him on his team. What do you think Jonathan to find out? Uh? Yeah, I think the record speaks for itself. You know. Here, let me just say this real quick. You know again, when I when you ask me a question, I try to answer that question. I don't try to bring it just back to a politician and blame them for every single thing in the world. I wish, Daniel, I'd love to see you do that. Answer the question. And there's the people on the left and people that play these political games answer the question. Because what you're seeing is when remember CNN was doing that commercial for a while about this is uh an apple, it's not a banana, so on and so forth. Seun, here's the real life. It's not whether an apple is a banana. It's whether or not an apple is a red juicy apple, a red delicious apple, or a fuji apple. What they're doing is they're lying to you about the type of apple. That's that is how they confuse the people. There are things going on and they they skew the facts, or they have anonymous people come on, or they have Colin Kaepernet come up here and do things. When he's wearing Shaykavera shirts, who is a communist sucks that depict cops his pigs. When you look at the totality of the circumstances of all the things that these people are doing, it's misinformation, it's lies, and it's all organized. Can I respond because this is really important to me, and I don't want you to think that I'm always trying to turn this on his head. The reason I give you another example is because I'm trying to understand where you're really coming from. So I understand, Jonathon that Katherine wore some socks that you don't like, any wars and clothing that you don't like. This is about giving the benefit of the doubt to people that you would otherwise support. There's plenty of things. And the reason I talk about the president is there are plenty of things that well meaning people I asked you about. Do you support Castro and you turn it into Donald Trump? You can't help yourself. You're like, you're like a Trump drug addict. You can't help it. Would you want what do you think about people that wear T shirts that honor murdering dictator thugs? Would you ever wear what do you think about people that do wear them? I think it's stupid. But I think there's Morticlo asked, if you think it's stupid, why would somebody honor a murdering, thug dictator. I don't know. Ask him, but there's more to him. You're the one that's defending him, and you're defending Nike's decision. Now, look, I don't support Boycott's Nike can do what they want, and I can buy Adidas a rebuk. I mean, I can do what I want, and I'm gonna watch college football and not pro football. But that's my choice. I don't urge anyone. Everyone makes up their own mind. You have a choice in life. I'm pro choice. I choose to watch college football. What do you choose to watch? Jonathan Well? I want to ask Daniel something. You know, she was in court as a defense attorney and her client walked in wearing a bright red Uh I love communist China or I love Kim john Un and she's trying to defend him in some kind of um, some kind of thing that has to do with import export stuff. I mean, do you think that a jury or a judge would not look upon that person and say that shirt directly reflects the person that he is and the values that he holds. Wouldn't you think that if they walked in and I was worrying? So this is we're we're actually an agreement. Of course I would say that. Of course I think it's stupid to do that, but we have to think about and that's what I'm saying. We got to end it there. Thank you both, A D nine one Sean, you want to be a part of the program at the bottom of this hour, Peter Schweitzer, way do you hear how creepy you know? Places like Google and Facebook are that's next? Google and Facebook. They don't sell you anything. They sell you. These are all free services, but obviously they're not. Your interaction with the misgoverned so that it will generate revenue. You give Google a lot of information. You're searching for the most private stuff on Google and things that your wife, my the spouse might not want you to know about. Facebook constantly manipulates their users. They do it by the things that they insert into the news fees, and they do it by the types of hosts they allow their users to see. They can suppress certain types of results diced on what they think you should be seeing, by on what your followers earth is. I think it's what Google and Facebook are doing on regular basis by suppressing stories, by steering us towards other stories rather than the story we're actually seeking. That's the real manipulation that's going on. I was a designed ethicistic Google, where I studied how do you ethically fear people's stocks? It will always favor one online music service over another, and one candidate over another. Google and Facebook has the power to undermine democracy without us knowing that democracy has been undermine. There's what I call the creepy line. And the Google policy about a lot of these things is to get right up for the creepy line, but not cross it. Google crosses the creepy line every day, all right. That's the trailer for by the Way to the Top of the Hour for a brand new documentary. It's called the creepy line. Now. That was a actual statement that was made by Eric Schmidt, the CEO of Google, was quoted in the New York Times back in in March. I mean that is creepy that we go up to the creepy line. And you know, with all the hearings that have been taking place, most Americans have no idea how How does Google make their money? How does Facebook make their money? These think, Oh I get a free Gmail account, Oh I get to I get a free Internet search. I just bring up Google. I don't pay anything for it. I don't pay a penny for it. Um, yeah you do. How much do you pay? How do you pay? How much privacy are you giving up in exchange for the opportunity to Google search anything that you want and have at the tip of your fingers any information you want anyway. The title for this documentary comes from the speech by Eric Schmidt, CEO of Google, said the company's policy was get to get right up to the creepy line and not cross it. Well, how do you determine a creepy line? You know? You say, well, pornography, I know when I see it is the creepy line. Something you know when you see it? Anyway? It interviews in this documentary documentary several high profile figures, including a Canadian clinical psychologist by the name of Jordan Peterson, who explained how these tech giants really hold great power that threatened the fabric of society. Uh, these services that they say are free are obviously not, because your interaction with all of these services is governed so it will generate revenue. Um. Anyway, joining us now is Peter Schweitzer and Peter of course with the Government Accountability Institute. Good to see my friend. Now you're moving into the movie business again. Great to be here with you, Sean. Thanks for having all right. Let's because a lot of people I think, like myself. I go to Google. I Google this, I google that. I'm in the middle of my show. Somebody asked me what it's so, and so say back in I can google it and I'll find it great service. I like it, appreciate it. Um. I mostly now let my social me to you, be guided by my team, and I don't have late night Twitter rans and fights like I used to because it takes too much time and effort. It's gotten too ugly, frankly, and where it used to be fun, it's not. But let's walk through how deep they get into our lives in the process of giving us something quote for free. That's a great question, Sean. And the bottom line is Google, this large corporation run by these individuals, knows far more about you than the most intimate person in your life, your parents, your spouse, uh, your boyfriend or girlfriend. They know everything because they know if you're searching for medical information, if you're you know, searching for do they put the name with the person or they do? They do? They know who the person is. They know based on the print of so they know, Sean Hannity correct. Although the problem is I have my staff using my accounts all the time, right right, So, but but whoever's connected with the IP address? So if sweet baby James is looking for creepy things on the internet, they're gonna I guess if he's doing it in my name on my account, that makes me look bad. That's right, They're gonna figure you, Sean, That's exactly how that has been with me for twenty seven years. And I know he looks for creepy things on the internet. So yeah, but I mean, this is the this is the problem. These companies know these things. Um And you know, some people in the younger generations say, I don't care about privacy. But here's the issue. It's not just that they have the information, it's that they can use that information and weaponize it against you. Uh. And this has already been done. You see people that have been banned, that have been blocked, you've seen instances where information about people has been leaked based on their search history. So you're vulnerable. And the question is are you going to trust this large corporation that not only has the interest of all corporations, which is making money, which is great. They have an agenda. They have an agenda that's very clear and specific. It's embedded into the company, and that agenda really runs contray ary to a lot of the beliefs and ideas that most Americans have. For example, Jack at Jacket Twitter, he actually sat down to an interview with us. Yeah, we talked a lot about about privacy and shadow banning and and some of the other practices. He was very honest in this sense by admitting they have not perfected any of this by any stretch, and so much of what they do, for example, on Twitter, is these algorithms that they put together. Um, but you're saying it runs deeper than that. So somebody works at Google and hate Sean Hannity, Right, They could get into my Gmail account. Yes, absolutely, I could see every email I've ever sent or received. Yes, I am somebody who has used Gmail for years. I'm going to stop using I am I have stopped using Gmail. Because here's gonna use I'm going to use the the email that's associated with my organization. Uh, you can use something like you know, go old school and use a O L. You can use other entities you don't want to use. You think all of those things are safe as a O well safe as yes, yes, Apple. Apple, for example, does not monetize the use of your information. Google's entire business model is based on collecting all this information about Sean Hannity and then either selling it to advertisers or using it in a way that they can monetize. So, I mean, what if you set up a fake Gmail account? You can you can set up a fake Gmail account and it's really depends what I p address it's associated with. If you go on your laptop or you go on your iPhone and you act and figure it out, they figure out who that is absolutely yeah, So what are those safer places than for people to do email and so on and so forth? You know, because most people I don't think are like me. All of my every one of my accounts is open to everybody that works for me. And in other words, it could be any person that is writing or texting on my behalf that's it. I mean that, And and I literally have given up private accounts, I've given up phone numbers, I've given up everything. This is a man who trusts his staff, by the way. That's that's that's what I'm saying. That's good, that's well, I'll find out. But with my staff, who did it? All right? But but the key thing to keep in mind with Gmail, for example, is Gmail not only knows all the emails you've sent, all the emails you've received. Let's say you wrote a rant in an email and you decided I'm not going to send it, and it's just as a draft. They've read that. They know what's in that draft. What do you mean they've read it? How many They scanned them? They scanned them. They electronically scanned them. So, for example, if you I mean, I'll pick a commercial example, if I were to send you an email and say, Sean, I'm thinking about buying a Toyota, Google knows that and will sell to Toda Toyota um advertising space based on the fact that they now know that I'm looking for a Toyota. All right, that's past the creepy line. Yes it is, it is, But is it actual people or is it just a program that they use. It's it's an algorithm, it's machines. It's machines that are scanning in their for certain keywords, but also human beings can intervene. So we talked about Jordan Peterson, this professor at the University of Toronto, you know, very famous now with a lot of things that he's done on YouTube. UM. In his particular case, he took a stand against a law in Canada that was going to force you to use the preferred gender um identifier for a person that they wanted, and he objected to this law on First Amendment grounds. Um. You know, very calm, cerebral guy. He took that position. The next day, Sean, he was locked out of his Gmail and his YouTube accounts were shut off. And what he was basically told was, yes, a machine did it, but then a person sort of backed up that decision. So based on his political beliefs, they shut him out of his Gmail account and shut him out of YouTube. He ended up getting it restored because he had friends in the media and he created this. But the point is there are employees at YouTube and elsewhere that can make arbitrary decisions. I don't like, uh, you know it isn't Eric Schmidt mean, I guess it's part of the user agreement that nobody ever reads. Right, right, that's exactly right. They have the right to to censor all all the two they share this information with the government, they can, yes, absolutely, And who are the companies? I think it's best for people to know what are the safer companies for people to deal with, because you know, look, I just got a copy of of The Creepy Line, and I know it's a documentary. Where are people are able to see this? But um, so it's gonna be released September seventeen. That's going to be available on iTunes and elsewhere you can you can purchase that. We're doing a screening in New York and d C as well. Um and we expect there's gonna be a lot of interest in Washington on this. But look, if you want to do search, use something like duck duck go. Do not use Google, Um, do not use never heard of duck duck go. What does duck duck go? Duck duck go? And I have no financial interest in this? Doug is that like Yahoo? Is that? Like? Well, see, here's the problem. Yahoo uses Google, so it's search, so you're you're not getting away from them by doing it. So the best one is duck duck. That they don't practice these that's right. How do they make their that's one example. Um, they do it. You'll see ads on the side, but it's not based on forward, it's not based on that's taking your information and selling it, that's right. What about email? So email? Um, Apple products are very good. Apple does not monetize so anything in Apple. I don't think Apple has a email address. Well, you can with with certain eye Cloud for example, and other entities and Nightcloud account. Yes, you could do it through an eye Cloud account. They save that information forever. Apple. Apple does not. Apple does not monetize emails, and they delete that information after a while because Apple is primarily they're selling products, right, they're selling cloud services and products. What about you mentioned a O L. Why are they safe? Well, A O L is safe because again they don't have the same business model that Google does. Google basically says we're gonna give you your information. No, they don't scan the information. They have the best safety technology. For example, it's so hard the FBI couldn't even break into if Apple if you want, yes, that's right. But if you want to go the hyper encryption rate, there's an email service called proton Mainte yeah, which is very very good out of Switzerland. But the bottom line is people need to be aware of this, and people need to be aware. It's not just a privacy issue. They will know your political profile, of your beliefs, and they will filter information to you to steer you in the direction that you may not be inclined. What about these encryption services, um, what do you call them? Signal and all that stuff. Those those are very good ways to communicate as well. And that information is not is not retained now proton Mail, when you say it's not retained, they don't retain it at all. That's wrong, that's right. What about Snapchat? Snapchat, same thing that basically disappears. Um, which one do you use? I'm just I use I use Signal, and I use proton mail. And then the server that we use for the Government Accountability Institute, we do not use Google technology there people that The bottom line is, Look, Google makes it attractive because it's low cost or free, uh, and it's very very useful, but people have to use uh, duc duct go is that. Uh is it well in that particular case, I mean, you get the same services as good. Yeah, it's the search is not quite as good. I mean that's the problem. I mean, Google is the big monster here. So but my point is it gonna make my staff do it and then it's gonna show up on their account. Yeah. I mean my point is, if you're gonna do a sensitive search on subjects that you don't want Google to know about, do it on something else. You can do it on Firefox, but of course Firefox sometimes uses Google, but use Firefox or duc duco. Do not use Google for sensitive searches because they will maintain that information on you. All right. So the documentary it's called The Creepy Line, and you gotta see it. Uh, And of course were's the best place to get the trailer. We'll put it up on Hannity dot com. Yeah, the Creepy Line Dodges brought to you by Google, um, apparently unbeknownst to me. And honestly, I think it's an opportunity to people, for people to understand just how intrusive this all is. That's exactly right, all right. Peter Schweitzer, Government Accountability Institute thank you for being with us. Thanks all right, one, Sean, Uh, take a quick break. We'll come back an incredible Hannity tonight, Breaking news all over the place. John Solomon will be breaking a story. Sarah Carter's Breaking News tonight nine eastern on Fox Search. Warrant you need an affidavit signed by a career federal law enforcement officer who swears that the information in the affidavit is true and correct to the best of his knowledge and belief. Uh. And that's the way we operate. And if it's wrong sometimes it is. If you find out there's anything incorrect in there, that person is going to face consequences. Right. That's Rod Rosenstein. We're gonna have a lot more on all of this new breaking developments, this house of cards about to literally fold as the President contemplating releasing all these important documents. We'll have the latest on Hannity tonight nine Eastern on the Fox News Channel. We'll load it up tonight, Greg Sarah, John Solomon with his breaking news report. We'll get to tonight, Mark Pan New Gingrich, Dr Gorka, David Shone. So you d v R Hannity. Oh, and the President has a rally I think it's going on during our hour. We'll be watching that closely as well, nine Eastern Hannity on Fox, and we'll see at nine back here tomorrow. Thanks for being with us.