Hi, folks, This is Louis Golmert, servant in the United States Congress from Texas. Here on behalf of a guy that I really love in a good platonic count of way. He uh. In fact, Sean Hannity when I tested positive for COVID back, I guess something like the end of July. I got a call from Sean every day for a week just making sure I didn't have a bad flare up, make sure I have would need. I mean, what an incredible guy. So it's always an honor to be here on behalf of Sean. We have an incredible lineup today and you want to know why this is such an important show. And Linda has been fantastic with the work she's done. Lauren used to be the associate producer here and now thank goodness, she's helping me in DC. But they've been doing a great job. But the show mainly today is going to be and get ready for it, fraud in the election. And if you have another person saying, well, I thought all of that had been debunked, you can say no, no. And in fact, no court has allowed an evidentiary hearing none zero. You can't debunk something unless you have an evidential here he I know. I was a litigator, I was a judge of the Chief Justice. I know about these things. And even the Supreme Court when the Constitution says you shall have original jurisdiction over any suit in which the states whose other states another state, the Supreme Court they wouldn't even allow a hearing. They just turned it down. People are afraid to deal with the fraud on the magnitude in which it occurred, and we're going to be talking about that. But really glad to have you with us today. This country is in crisis. It's I've heard people say it's at a crossroad. No, folks, this country is not at a crossroad. We passed the crossroad road a good while back. We're at the edge of a cliff. We're about to either go off and that cliff and in the greatest gift of a country God ever allowed of people to have, or we'll get back to the crossroads where we headed off in the direction of socialism good while back, so that we can get back on the track of freedom, self determination, freedom of choice, and education, for example, and ending the pure socialist indoctrination that's been going on for quite some time, and personally I think Dustyevsky had it right in the late eighteen hundreds when he was mocking and taking on the things that some idiot named Marx was thrown out there and really, folks, a guide that could not even foresee the arising of a middle class, which is America's strength. That's not somebody listened to read and pay attention to. He's an idiot. So one thing, historically, though, it is true about education. You cannot manipulate a people into choosing socialism until you have taught them lies about the best parts of their history, and you've made them think that something good and wholesome is evil. The Solvids use that tactic, and in fact, that has been the tactic of socialists and progressives everywhere. Many of them are not evil, but they have just been manipulated and miseducated themselves. You know, the bill Errors and the revolutionists of the nineteen sixties. They realized eventually they weren't accomplishing anything by blowing things up or killing or having sit ins. And they apparently realized that if they became tenured professors in colleges and taught the future teachers of young Americans, how evil America was, how grandiosocialism was. They could achieve a revolution that their tactics of the sixties just couldn't do. So we're at a point where vast numbers of our universities, whether they have good sports teams or not, have become liberal bastions of miseducation, leading young people into wanting to leave behind what was once the most free country in the history of the world. Took over two hundred years to get there, but then they started moving on the socialist or Wellyan totalitarian track, and we got to get off that track. We're headed over the cliff if we don't. You cannot have social by the way, without a totalitarian government that forces its people into subjugation. That's the only way it goes. Now. Dostoevsky got commented, the problem with socialism is not economic. The problem with socialism is atheism. The government has to become God. And I'm telling you the summer I was there as an exchange student, and there were eight Americans allowed in on the program that year, and we were to the city state point of the summer. We were going out to seize the gorse. It was the only authorized Christian seminary, religious seminary in the whole country because Lenin was a god, Socialism was a god, and it was so ironic. But as you look at this, I don't know, four or five story buildings, something like, there was a big building there as you turned into the gates of the seminary, and there was a picture of Lenin and it said Lenin znummy, Lenin is with us. You may be going in here and thinking you believe in God, but really it's Lennen rubber ears and all. At least that was what they I saw him. I don't know if his ears were rubber or not, but that was the rumor back at the time. But anyway, that's brought us to the stolen election. The election model that the thieves used was based on the notion that President Trump could not possibly get more votes than the Obama high point two thousand and eight. So when President Trump's votes flew by those numbers by the millions, it forced these a socialist election thieves into moving quickly and overtly. They couldn't do it secretly so well, because Trump was about to win the whole thing more so than originally planned, and even rolling out suitcases of ballots and loading hundreds of thousands of ballots into their easily manipulated systems. So we're gonna be covering a lot of things about that. And by the way, I haven't checked this week, but a week or so ago i'd heard it was true, and so I did a Google request. I don't normally use Google at all, don't trust them, but about the stoppage of the vote counting the night of the election, and long behold, I got all these uh responses on the first page about that didn't happen. Politic hack had done their check and it was false, and all these uh, you know, leftists used to be called mainstream media, but let's face it, they're not mainstream media. They're all left media, that's what they are. And uh, you know, they were confirming that nobody stopped vote counting. That was a lie. It was a false and it reminded me of my summer in the Soviet Union. Don't believe your eyes in ears will tell you what you can believe. In fact, can we play that this is what was in the media there, if you would do that montage. We are live outside of that warehouse in the North side. This morning, and they decided to press pause because they noticed there was an issue with their precinct information not loading correctly, not getting that information outright either or even correctly, So they decided to press a pause on that and get back to it later this morning. We go to Quinette County. That's where a software glitch caused a delay in counting votes there. In Fulton County, we had a bit of a snaffu overnight in the ballot counting there. CBS's Sabrina Silva live at Fulton County's elections warehouse with brand new information this hour, Sabrina volunteers. Actually, it looks like we're out of steam last night. From what we hear is that these volunteers, they were simply too tired to continue counting these ballots the last night, and we're sent home around one am. Nevada, meanwhile, has stopped counting votes until nine am on Thursday, so we will not know what's happening in Nevada until that. All Right, there you go. If you heard that and all the talk about stoppage, your ears were lying to you that didn't happen. You can't believe what your ears told you. You were hearing. Why because you can do a Google search and find out that's all false. Nope, that never happened that night. So let's face it. This is socialist right socialist manifesto basically, may I mean, it's orwelly. And one of the few things I've been quoted accurately as saying is, gee, the only thing Orwell got wrong apparently was the year what in nineteen eighty four? It's now and this is exactly what's been going on. But I was in my first meeting about electronic election fraud in December two full years ago, and there were some former Intel folks that had a firm, and they said, you need to see this, and they showed evidence of an electronic fraud in Dallas County election counting back in the primary in twenty eighteen and then in the general election in twenty and eighteen. So I'm not new to this whole story. We had been trying to get We were trying to get law enforcement in Texas, including the Texas Attorney General, to do something because I felt like, look, if we can get the state of Texas to act on this fraud, there's plenty of evidence here from which to get a search warrant to seize the vote counting equipment, the voting equipment, and the flash drives that were used in early voting, all this stuff. We could get that stuff before they get rid of it, and then we can save the whole country from what's coming in twenty twenty, because in twenty eighteen they used the primary in general election as really practice, and they learned from mistakes, they got better at their fraud. But anyway, and let me tell you when I first heard that Sorrows or somebody who was spending a bunch of money trying to get people in charge of vote counting in different places and you know, elections in different places, and then also the effort to get prosecutors of their choice in certain places. I thought, well, at least we're safe in Texas because the Secretary of States appointed by the Republican governor, so we're okay. I didn't think about the fact that where the biggest source of fraud would be coming from was huge counties that were all Democrat to run and had been for a while, and that they would hire vote counting firms that could potentially be massive problems. And so we've seen that carried out I got frustrated last year and gave up on Texas actually protecting the country in itself. And I know there were a few indictments, but none of the big stuff that could have really made a difference. So I presented themselves to folks in the federal government that I thought would make a difference. But our Department of Justice is just so compromised. But fortunately for the socialist fascists, they've had social media monopolies that can tell you you can't believe anything that you saw or heard that might indicate problems, like suitcases full of ballots being pulled out when all the Republican poll watchers were run off. Now I don't believe any of that, But listen, folks. To have free and fair elections, the voting process, the accounting process must be one hundred percent visible, must be witnessed bipartisan observers, and as cheap as cameras are, for heaven's sake, just videotape everything. Let's make sure everybody knows that it's going to be free and fair. And by the way, another thing is, well, you know, they got rid of evidence and Alita ordered, uh, you know, the ballots to be kept of a certain type, and they didn't. They mixed and mingled. There was a legal doctrine called spoliation. If one party in a suit controls evidence and that party either destroys the evidence or mingles it, confuses it with others so it cannot be produced, or if they refuse to produce it, then the judge or jury may consider that that evidence they refused to produce or lost got rid of. That evidence proved the allegation that the other the party was making. A court can take notice of that. And nobody's talking about that it matters, and so we say, well, they don't have the evidence, what can do? Well, the court should take judicial notice that they don't didn't produce the evidence that would approved or disprove the allegations. And since they hit them, destroyed them, got rid of them, obviously it proved that they were engaged in fraud. This is the Sean Hannity Show. This is Sean's friend Louis Gombert in for Sean, and I hope you'll come right back. There's a lot more ahead in this show, and you're going to be able to take on your friends about the fraud issue. If you'll listen. Hello, folks, this is Sean Hannity Show. This Louis Gohmert sitting in, and look, we're going to have the whole show. We're gonna be talking about the fraud in the election, and people listen. Just if people you know are discu courage, have them tune in too Sean's show, because they're gonna come away with all kinds of ammunition. My website is www dot gomert dot com. And look, you want to call in, We're gonna be taking calls. We're gonna have experts and hopefully most of them will be able to take calls. It's eight hundred and nine four one seven three two six. That's eight hundred nine four one Sean, and that's sewn Sea In. So anyway, I know one of the Democrats's favorite words is disenfranchisement of voters. Well, look this was the largest, most massive disenfranchisement of voters in world history. The courts have shown that not one of them is willing to pursue justice, not one. So we're gonna be talking about that. Please come back. Matt DePerno is going to be with us Constitutional attorney out of Michigan, and you're gonna learn a whole up more This is this is a Sean Hannity show. This Louie Gomert Lowly, member of Congress from from Texas, and we're glad you're here with us. And by the way, to help. Yeah, I've mentioned my website at dot com, but Linda, you've got some great stuff up. Where do people go? So on Hannity dot com. We wrote it up yesterday and we have a whole list for the six battleground states, um for all of your legislators in those all important states. So make sure you call them, email them, let them know that the best Christmas gift is the gift of freedom. If you want to see all the videos about it, go to Election Night Facts. This This Rembel account has some of the best videos I've seen out there. Just check it out. Stay on those legislator guys, they work for you. And anybody that says the fraud has all been debunked, that asked them where unfounded and asked them where there was a hearing that debunked it, because there's been Yeah, I'd love to watch it for sure. It hadn't happened, not even the Spring Court. Well, look, we have a constitutional attorney from Michigan. Mark Dpurnel with us at I'm sorry, I said, Mark Dinna, Yeah, Matt. Sorry. Matt. He represents William Bailey, a resident of Andram County, and he is just all over this stuff and he knows there was fraud as well in this election. Matt Deparnel, Welcome to the Sean Hannity Show. Thanks Louis, thanks for having me on. Hey man, it's great to have you on, and we really appreciate your work. You know, you had apparently done an analysis, you had access to the dominion software and the machines, and then your analysis was put under a gag order. How could things be unfounded when the things that that would debunk them if it were such, get put under gag order. I mean, it's incredible, but you have been fighting and we need more of your fighting spirit in Congress. But tell us what you have found with regard to fraud in this election from all your deep dive into this stuff. Sure, thank you. We file the lawsuit in Antrim County on November twenty third because we wanted to get to the bottom of why the results were so skewed in favor of Joe Biden. On November third. This is a county that's historically sixty to sixty five Republican, but on election night it flipped to sixty percent. Joe Biden and my client in particular was concerned about some down ballot races for school board elections, so we filed the lawsuit. No one knew about our lawsuit because it was just an issue that we raised regarding the down ballot races. And we were able to get a court to issue an injunction and allow us to examine the dominion software and bring in a team of expert to take forensic images of those computers, thumb drives, and program cards, and we obtained those on December six on a Sunday. My team worked throughout the week to collect or research the data, collect their data, and write a preliminary report. And we filed a motion with the court to allow us to release those findings to the country on December fourteenth, and we had a hearing on December fourteenth, and the judge granted that and we were able to release that report. And the report tells us and I'm just going to quote from from the report, it's still we conclude that the dominion voting system is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an ign armously high number of ballot errors. The election ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud, and based on our study, we conclude that the dominion voting system should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified, and we are able to extrapolate those results to the other forty seven counties in Michigan that also use this system. Wow, that's phenomenal. Not only was the fraud not debunked or unfounded, it was quite founded from your terrific research and work. Really appreciate what you've been doing now. I understood also that in Michigan there was there were some places where there was more turnout than there were people. Had you seen anything on that, Matt Well, Our study was specific to Antrim County. We did see what we did see. Even last Thursday when the Secretary of State. After our lawsuit was filed, the Secretary of State decided to do what she called a low risk audit throughout the state and she handpicked certain precincts in the state which would be beneficial to her argument. But she also said that she would audit the entire Antrim County results. So we did that last Thursday, but it was false in terms of what she said. It wasn't an actual audit. What she did was nothing more than a hand recount, which has already been done up in Antrim County. So but what we found during that hand recount were a number of oddities or errors, including blank ballots mixed in with the regular ballots and not in big stacks, but in ones and twos and threes. And we know that when you feed a blank ballot through the dominion software system, it doesn't reject the ballot, but it creates an error and sends ballots to adjudication. So that was an issue we found, and we found other irregulars. Now, Matt, if if there's no marked vote, it's a blank ballot, gee, that sounds like something that would require adjudication. Somebody to examine it closely to see gee. I wonder who the voter of this blank ballot really intended to vote for. Must have been Biden. And of course I'm prone to sarcasm, but wasn't it in Antrim County? Also that there was a sixty eight percent error rate, right, That's what the that's what the forensic team found. That there's sixty eight percent rate when you feed a ballot into the machine. And remember when you feed, when you feed a ballot into the machine, that's a paper ballot. That machine translates that that written ballot into data. That data can be manipulated, and through this system in the adjudication process, someone somewhere, sitting in another room, or another state or another country can mass adjudicate bunches of ballots with a single click of the button for whichever candidate they see fit. Wow, that well, And you mentioned the Secretary of State as I understand that she sent a Board of Electors directive out on one December to all the clerks telling them to delete all electronic records, which is a violation of state law records retention requirements. Do you know if she's been called on that at all. Well, I think a lot of people have called her out on that, and we certainly have because she knew that we had filed the lawsuit, and then after the lawsuit was filed, once she got wind of it, she did two things. Number One, she tried to intervene in the case, and she intervened in the case because she wanted to try to block the report that we prepared from coming out to the public. And number two, she's been on a relentless attack. Her and Dana Nessel, the Attorney General here in Michigan, have been on a relentless attack against me and my client and the team that we work with, the forensic team. She's attempted to discredit them, discredit us. I've been threatened repeatedly by the attorney general. She's now attempting to come after my law license. This is tyranny, is what we're seeing. It's totalitarianism and it's fascism. What we're seeing. Their attempting to squash the public discourse regarding elections. They don't want anyone to challenge election results, and when you do, they try to silence you. So in that regard, we've attempted to put up a fundraising campaign for my client on my website. It's d Perno Law dot com, d epe r n O law dot com. And we're asking anyone if you can help to try to combat and fight this fashion. Yeah, it's exactly what it is. And I know that our Chairman of Judiciary gets upset when I'm pointed out. But you know they like to say, you know, Republican is a Nazi is Hitlerno. But if you just do a any check at all with or your history, you find out that the Nazi Party was the German Socialist Worker's Party. It was the Socialists that were the Nazis, the fascists. And we're sure seeing that here that you can't have a free and fair election if people can't rely on the vote counting. And of course I'm sure you remember it was historically Stallin that said basically, it doesn't matter who votes, it matters who counts the votes. And that's what the Socialists in this country have figured out, and that's why they stacked the deck the way that they did. So well, Matt, you are verifying that there is fraud. There was fraud in this election. It hasn't has not only not been debunked and not it's not unfounded. You have found a basis in fact for it. So where do things stand legally in Michigan as a result of your suit. Well, right now, legally we've been able to release the report. Anyone who wants to read the report can go to my website DePerno Law dot com. It's posted there. But in terms of the lawsuit, we're now in the discovery phase. The Secretary of State made a calculated decision to try to intervene in the case because she wanted to stop the release of the report. The court denied that request, allowed us to release it, and now she's a party defendant subject to discovery and we get to take her deposition and ask for records. So that was a calculator move she made. But we need help. We really need help from all the people across the country to help support this cause. Because we're the only lawsuit in the country that's been given access to the dominion voting system. We'll need to analyze this and study it properly, So we need help from everyone out there. If you tell that leave tell them how to help you well, help us by donating at the pernal Law dot com. There's two fundraiser raisers that some kind citizens have created to help us fund this litigation, and we need your help. We need everyone's help because the Secretary of State and the Attorney General are trying to stop this information from coming out. Matt. We can't thank you enough. You've heard Matt. He's doing great work, but he needs help and there are people out there that can help him. I hope that works out because we're going to fight for the country. We're going to take a break and we're going to be right back and take your calls at eight hundred and nine for one. Sean and Matt, thanks so much for being with us and providing the clarity you have. We'll be right back. This is the Sean Handy Show. This is Louie Gomert sitting in for Sean. Let's go to the phones. Let's see Rick from Michigan. We just heard from Michigan attorney Rick. Thanks for listening to the Sean Hannity Show. Yes, after watching all these people pulling ballots off from under tables, people being checked out yours, why hasn't anybody been arrested yet? You know that is such a good question, Rick, and it frustrates the heck out of me. I've been a prosecutor before, and you know, for people to get away with this stuff and then for the media to cover for him and say it's not even happening, it's outrageous. The Department of Justice has become the Department of injustice. I had great hope for our Attorney General Barr and Durham. I didn't know Durham, but it seemed like it was going well. But nothing resulted. And you know, when when Barr keeps saying I've seen no evidence of problem, he he's not the one that goes out and investigates. He has to rely on the FBI for that. And as I've told the President, as long as Christopher Ray was in the FBI, America's were not safe. I think, my opinion, he took his admonition to clean up the FBI and he swept everything under the rug. That's the way it appears to me. And they have not been a Department of Justice. They have not been investigators. They've been cover up artists here in Washington, DC. But that's why nobody's been arrested. Tried to get our Attorney General's office in Texas to do something for two years and nothing happened. So it is very frustrating. I know there. I've got friends that are saying we just need to get rid of the FBI and start fresh with a new federal Investigation Bureau of some kind. But I hoped that Ray might come in and clean it up. He didn't. And as a result, you know, and I know the FB there were FBI that lied to Jeff Sessions. No, there's no evidence here there yon, So I figured they did the same thing to Bar But great question. Will be right back, and we're gonna be diving in deeper to the fraud that did occur in the last election. This is Sean Handicott Show, eight hundred nine for one. Seawan call us. We'll be right back. This is the Sean Hannity Show. This is Louis Golmert, a little member of Congress from Texas, sitting in for Sean and h I'm glad to have heard that montage. It is incredible how vast the media has moved just to try to convince people that there is no fraud there when it is clear to anyone, as the Bible says, anyone with eyes to and ears to hear. And we've got a couple of guests here that have eyes and ears, they understand they've seen what's gone on. And that's Ian Northern from the Amis Stide Project and Thomas Moore Society as well as Phil Klein. I'm Stide Project director, former Kansas Attorney General. Welcome to the Sean Hannity Show. Guys, Well, thank you, thanks for having us, Congressman, hell thanks for being had little joke. But anyway, look, I appreciate so much y'all's dive into this. Do y'all support the idea? And I'm sorry to use the term y'all to somebody north of the Southern line, but hey, hey, the language needed a second person plural. What can I say? We supplied it and it works y'all for you know, or three people all y'all for a big crowd. But anyway, you guys to use New York slang. Use guys, you really have done a deep dive and you didn't take the answer that there wasn't any fraud here. Tell us about what you've found from all your research on the election. Well, Congressman, we've been in the field for about two years now, and not only on we've witnessed the beginning of the movements of lots of private money into managing the election. And it started in March of twenty twenty when you had David Pluth, Obama's former campaign manager, who published a book called The Citizens Guide for Defeating Donald Trump, and on PG. Eighty one he spoke about the need of an effort if the Democrats are going to win, to do a block by block street fight to turn out the vote in Minneapolis, Detroit, and Philadelphia and the urban course cities. Soon after that, you started to see a sleepy little five o one seed called the Center for Tech and Civic Life reaching out to these Democrat mayors and saying, look, we got some money coming, and we want to give you a little money now to plan your election. And if you do it the way we want you to do it. You know, essentially they're buying those local government election offices. We're going to buy these offices from you, and we'll tell you how to run the election, and we'll send money your way. And soon enough, Mark Zuckerberg gave a total of three hundred and fifty million dollars to that charity who started to buy up these local election offices and dictate oman from the election and all the illegalities, the sidestepping of state law, the ignoring of the signature projects, the consolidated counting centers then locked Republicans out, the bleach of the chain of custody of drop boxes occurred everywhere. Zuckerberg money touched totally gave four to nineteen million. So yes, there's obvious and admitted illegalities that call into question the election. And now I would just say that Democrat officials are doubling down. And we see that in Michigan. We're Ian Norton is our local council there in handling our litigation. And in Michigan and went so far as the attorney general of the state threatening legislators with criminal investigation if they disagreed with the results of the election, and the governor locking Republicans out of the state House while allowing Democrats in, and Ian was there. Ian was trying to get them in their work. Just incredible. You know, I mentioned earlier in the show when I first heard that there was big money coming from Democrats to buy spots for people that control elections, I thought, well, Texas will be saved because Secretary of State in charge. But I didn't think about the big Democrat controlled cities where we've found out that's where an awful lot of fraud has occurred. And really, guys, I'm not sure about what you've run into, but in Texas, if you're a rural county and you're elected to be the county clerk in charge of the elections and you go out and hire somebody else to come in and do all your election counting for you, well you're probably not going to win again because you got hired to do that. And yet that's what we're seeing in the big cities of Texas. And I couldn't help but think when I've read about what you guys were doing, that that must be what you're running into around the country as you've dug into this. Well, that's exactly right, Congressman. You know, we saw money being poured into places like Flint, Michigan, Mouskegan, Michigan, Pontiac, Michigan, you know, four hundred thousand, four hundred and seventy five thousand, then Detroit, the Coup de gras three and a half million, you know, about ten million dollars total poured into Michigan through these Zuckerberg charities. And when you saw that it translated directly into high paid consultants in the you know, adjudication board, you know, looking at absentee ballots deciding who who voted for whom. You know, you saw, you know, money being paid to workers that in the rural counties, you know, like where I grew up in Michigan. Michigan has a few cities, but most of its rural. It's the woods, and they'd get minimum wage or would be volunteers. And then you go into these these targeted areas with Zuckerberg money and they're being paid six hundred, six hundred and fifty dollars a day. And when you start to do that, you know, you start to have a disparate impact, in disparate treatment. Votes are being treated differently in those counties, in those cities than they were every place else in the state. And you can't help but think. And in fact, it did translate into different effects, in different results in the way veterans ballots and other ballots for being treated in real time, and when you translate that out not just to Michigan, but to other states as well, those targeted moneys, targeted areas. What's difficult about this is when I filed lawsuits before the election, before everything was in controversy. You know, they were over technical violations. People look up statutes with weird names like HAVA, the Help America's Vote Act. Well, when you do that, it says every penny has to be accounted for, the moneys have to go to the federal agencies or the states themselves. You keep the receipts. It's transparent, you have rules and regulations that track it. But when this money comes in through these private sources, not only does it arguably violate HAVA, but now there are clawback provisions. So instead of being transparent, it's concealed. Instead of saying follow the federal guidelines for air rates for voting machines, for example, now if you don't follow Mark Zuckerberg's guidelines, he says he's going to clawback that money through charity agreement. That's the kind of stuff that shocks people's conscience when it's put in front of their nose. But the media and so many others are out there trying their darnedest to keep people from finding out about what happened. And you know, that's a pretty cheap date. Ten million bucks for Michigan with only about five and a half million people voting at about a buck seventy five a vote, and when you target it to those specific areas, he got off. He made a pretty cheap business decision that if you or I were to do that as an individual, it would arguably be a felony. It would be a crime. It's improper for an individual to pay money into election officials. But yet somehow it's okay when it's done through a charity or or through these local governments. I don't think so. And that's why we sued before the election, and that's why we continued our lawsuits. Since what's the status of the suit, Bill can talk about that, but we filed one yet today in DC Federal Court. Good good, yeah, we our new federal suit challenges these headlines, which are arbitrary that Congress is set on state legislatures to review an exercise the authority into the Constitution. And Congressman, I would just have one point, just as an example of the disparate impact that occurred. This occurred Zuckerberg Bunny flew into these states at the same time Blue state governors were shutting down in person polling places, claiming COVID was the concern, and as you know, Republicans prefer to vote in person on a legend day. Yet they were opening up opportunities for more voting in person in all of these urban cores with Zuckerberg Bunny. For example, in Philadelphia, they mandated that Philadelphia have eight hundred satellite polling locations. They put a dropbox in Democrats strollingholds in Pennsylvania one every four square miles. That's a drop box, you know, two mile by two miles square. You could stroll and vote in the fifty nine counties that Trump one. In twenty sixteen, there was one dropbox for every eleven hundred and fifty nine square miles. So if you live in a Democrat area, it's hey, we'll pick up your ballot or walk down to the corner and vote. If you live in a Republican area, it's go on a weekend vacation and find walto government can't do that. That's wrong, shouldn't well, and they shouldn't be privatizing the election. As we've seen in the big county it's where the corruption seems to be at its very worst. So you don't support the idea that all of the allegations of fraud have been debunked and are unfounded. Direct that is absurd. In fact, there's admitted lawlessness in each and every one of these states, with local officials saying we will not vote follow voter id for indefinitely confined persons requirements like in Wisconsin, or we're not going to follow signature requirements like they did in Michigan. Well, we're not going to require witnesses on the ballot like they did in several of these states. There are admitted legalities and every one of these states that calls into question the results of the election. Yeah, you know. And what's worse, Congressman, is that when when legislatures, who's ultimately it's their responsibility to manage the time, place, and manner of elections, but we're state legislatures try and do something about it, they get locked out at their own chamber like in Michigan, or when when they demand that the Secretary of State in Michigan come before them and answer questions under oath, she refuses. So again, this is a situation where you know, legislatures, you know, I think in many respects, um, you know, uh, winner came early. So to speak in Michigan. A lot of them were sleeping or maybe already in hibernation, but you know they're starting to wake up to this and starting to look at the evidence. But even those efforts to try and do the right thing and make sure that you know, a fraudulent election isn't sealed and delivered to DC. You know, their efforts to do that have been awarded. They've not been able to meet in person because of COVID exceptions. Well there's no COVID exception to the Constitution, you know. And no, they've been locked out of their own building, the People's House in Lansing. In other places too, we've we've heard of interference, of these threats of reprisals and other interferences. And that's the type of stuff that I would call upon those legislators to stand up, stand up to their executive branch. You know, they're supposed to be a balance of powers and separation of powers, and they need to assert themselves now or also never have the chance to do it again in the future. Well, nothing motivates legislators like having no being one, like having their constituents call email let them know that they feel strongly about an issue, and there shouldn't be much that you feel more strongly about them. Free and fair elections. We didn't have one this time. It was so corrupted. But tell people how they can find out more about what you're doing. Well, I wouldn't who it's people to go to one. Do as you suggested, Congressman, call the legislatures and let them know they need to act, and they need to act now and not let the governors stand in the legs. You can learn more about us at www. Got got hyphen freedom dot org, got dash freedom dot org. That's great, and as you know from being litigators, it takes time to get discovery. I'm wondering about in Arizona, though, where the Arizona Legislature had subpoenaed some voting machines as I understand it, and the clerk says, now you can't have them. Seems to me like maybe it's time to cut off some state money to places that don't comply to try to cover up results of elections. But you guys are doing great work and we appreciate what you're doing so much, and we'll be right back. This is the Sean Hannity Show. Come on back, you're gonna find out about more fraud. This is the Sean Hannity Show. This is Louis Gombert sitting in for my friend Sean. And let's go to the phones. We've got Margaret in Utah. Margaret, good afternoon, Welcome, Thank you so much. It is a pleasure to talk to you. Long time listeners. Listeners, but never were able issue. Well, I'm glad I got to hear from you. You have a question, Margaret, Yes, I have a couple of questions. One of them is what is um White House or the Senators and congressmen going to do on January sixth? Is there a way to stop this craziness at that point? Yeah, there is, and it requires objection by both House member and senator and hopefully, as I understand it, tub Reville from Alabama has said he will object. We know you don't have to be from the state the votes to which you're objecting, since Barbara Box are objected, I think it's to Ohio back in two thousand and five. But we have got to have enough evidence out there, and the courts have not allowed it. So we got to do like Reagan and go over the heads and get evidence out there to the public so that they can be screaming to their representatives and senators that they better object and they better support this effort, or they're going to be out on the street. But that's what's got to happen. There is evidence, and we're going to be getting it out for people to see. And you need to be contacting your senators to make sure they understand what you expect from them. But we're going to be objecting. We're going to be making clear that this broad has to be dealt with and it's not appropriate to steal elections. And hopefully we'll get a Justice Department at some point that we'll punish crime instead of just Republicans. This is the Sean Hannity Show, and this is Louis Goldmer sitting in for Sean. And by the way, the question from Margaret in Utah about you know, what can President Trump do well. When I was at the White House yesterday, one of the things I told him is, look, bars checked out. You know, we didn't get anything near like we expected in the way of justice. And as I know from being a former felony judge, you know, the law in Texas makes very clear when you assess the sentence. You're supposed to consider general deterrence, that you have a significant enough sentence that others are deterred from engaging in the same conduct. You have specific deter so it's powerful enough that it deters this person from ever repeating the conduct, and you have safety of the general public. But we have not gotten anything in the order of general deterrence to scare people away from cheating in elections. And it's got to happen. I told the president, Look, you could appoint a special counsel. You know, Bars checked out, he's not doing his job. You could appoint He said, well, they're telling me I can't appoint a special counsel. Well, whoever is telling him that does not understand the government in the United States. All power under the president in the executive branch comes through the president, and he can't appoint a special counsel. I encouraged him in June or twenty seventeen. Look, they appointed Muller for nothing. He's not going to be fair. You ought to have a special counsel appointed. You ought to appoint him to just investigate. How we ever got to the place of having a special counsel investigate this whole thing's it stinks to I have but he was persuaded back then not to do that. Let it run it course its course, and it was a very wasteful course. Of course. Well, Muler came out good financially and Weissman and they got to trash a lot of people and destroy some good people. But nonetheless, we have some great guests and they've been doing deep dives. John Basham data scientists, meteorologists, he loves to dig into data. We have justin A. Mealy, former Arabic linguists and he's an intelligence analyst at the NSA, has been software developer. And Dave Laboue he's artificial intelligence experts. You put these guys together and they're kind of like Russell Ryandslon's group of Phil Waldren's group. They have got some brilliant people. They're brilliant, they're working with good people, and they've done some deep dives into the raw data. And that's where there's an awful lot of answers, it appears. But guys, welcome to the Sean Hannity Show. Thanks for being here, and don't need to call me congressman. I'm just Louis. But glad to have you here, and Linda was saying, you know, these guys are so good, just let them take it and run with it. Well, that's scary. First, I will call you Congressman. This is a John Bashman. I wanted to say that because Congressman. Also, I'm from Texas and you are from Texas one, and we could not be any prouder than to have you represent us in Congress. Sir. It is an honored You're very kind, John. Thank you. If I were still a judge or chief justice, you'd have to call me judge or chief justice. But now I'm just a lowly legislator, so Louis is quite adequate. But thank you. Well, listen, get into the data, guys. You said, we've been looking at this stuff, and we have been doing a lot of deep dives. And these guys that are that are on here with me, they're they're incredible at going into the individual granularity. The one nice thing about being a meteorologist is my job is to take that insane amount of science internative is something that people can understand, and it really comes down to after we looked at all the data and just keep in mind that no one I keep hearing all of these people say that they haven't seen anything. They haven't seen anything. No one has taken the time that we have taken hundreds and hundreds of man hours to review all of this data across multiple states down to the county increasinct level to identify what we've identified, which was something that I think all of us felts on election night that something might be wrong. And when we dug into the data we did find we found multiple anomalies and errors that needed to be addressed and needed to be answered. And you know, from one of the ones that stuck out to me immediately was when we started seeing election data where votes went backwards. How do you mean, well, you know, we would see the raw election data and these guys who will go into greater detail on that, but we would see the raw election data. Say the votes would come in and I'll give just a random number here, but say we're a thousand votes for Trump and then twenty minutes later, Trump only had eight hundred votes. So where did the two hundred votes go? How did that happen? And we thought, well, maybe that was an error in the reporting, Maybe it was a human error. Maybe there's one hundred different reasons it could have happened, but we saw it across multiple counties, precinct states, and we started to see this replicate in a very specific pattern. That started to leave us a lot of questions. So did you get any answers? Yeah, I think you know, Justin has has a great deal of expertise in explaining how this data was moving back and forth. And I'll defer to him on that. Congressman. Yeah, plays Justin just don't speak it in Arabic, A definitely coresman. So yeah, basically, obviously we came together real quick to just give a little history. We came together directly after the election as a bunch of volunteers because hey, we saw there was a bunch of things that happened last night. They were not explained. Nobody gave us any sufficient explanation as to why we saw these things happening, and so we wanted to look at the real data. So we took an approach of you know, other people had taken other approaches where they're looking at voter rolls and things like that, dead voters, illegals voting you know, out of state, that type of thing, and that's fine. I'm not saying that, you know, those things didn't happen, but it could be our getting court that those people voted for Trump. You can't prove that. So we wanted to take an approach of looking at things that were hard, irrefutable facts that that could be proved that could not be disproved. Right, So that's exactly and that's that's that's the proach that we so obviously right now, our folks, our biggest focus is on Arizona because we have data sets right now that show without a doubt, at a statistically impossible level, that there were irregularities I will call them, But obviously you don't know what that means. That there were things that happens in during that election that is now proven in our data set, which we're going to release our data set and our methodology and everything like that. You know, we've released a couple of videos, but we're going to release our all that stuff out there to show people and have them take a look at it and be able to replicate what we've done here and show that basically there was there's no way it could have happened the way it did. So they go into more detail about the actual numbers and everything like that. But I just wanted to show, you know, talk to you about, you know, just like why we did this, because it's really really important that you know, go ahead. Well, Rudy Gigliani had given me some information yesterday. Um. Uh, Indica, there's twenty two thousand and early twenty three thousand mail in ballots were received the day before the ballot was recorded as being sent out. Uh. Did you see any kind of phenomenalies like that? Well, we have we have very specific data that we're looking at, which is directly from the Secretary of State's website. So you can go right now to the Secretary of the State's website, uh, and and downloading data. And so the data that that show is really like you're looking at vote totals for you know, for vote totals for the different candidates for the different questions you know, president, uh, you know, voting for transits, voting for you know, this this local thing, all that stuff. So the thing is that we're only like, we only have those data points. Now, what we did was we originally started with you know, what people might know as the Edison data set. It's kind of basically a data set that goes out to CNN and you know, the National Election Pool. So when you were to watch the news, you would be looking at the Edison data set, you know, and that that has been basically told to us from the Secretary of States website. Well that's completely, um, you know, irrelevant because it's not accurate to what our data is. But luckily enough, in the last couple of days, we actually got the time series data from the Secretary of State's website as they released it that night, provided by um, you know, a patriot known as Garrett Archer. I guess he put out this date. He put out this via Originally it's to debunk our methodology, but all he did was proved that our data was one matching exactly what the Secretary of State has put out. So this was the data that is that secret that the State of Arizona used to certify the election. And so you know, as we'll release this out and release the details out in further videos, you know, you'll basically be able to see that there is something going on that m proves that there's no way that this could have happened. Um statistically, yeah, uh, Dave, you have an incomment yeah, absolutely, And just to take a step back to talk about, you know, what this data looks like. So, yeah, the listeners can conceptualize what we're working with. You can think about it, you know, from an election standpoint. But just as you'd manage your own personal finances, you'd log into your bank and you'd check your checking account and savings account, typically have them tied together on the same screen. And once we strung together these different data sources from the precinct, county, and state level and we had them merge side by side against these sort of time series updates. Imagine you logged in on November fourth and look back at your bank statement, and in the last twenty four hours, you saw a flurry of activity back and forth between your checking account and your savings account. And sometimes you'd say, okay, well, it's just going from my account to my account. That's strange, but at least it's balancing out, and that happens a good portion of the time. In other instances, you'd see a certain amount that just evaporates entirely. So there was a number of different activities that were not only suspicious, but you'd imagine if you'd logged in and saw that happening. You don't want to know exactly what was going on between those hours, and the combination of both the activity within accounts and across accounts really hasn't been addressed or explained. As you know, this data presents itself. So we've brought this, we've brought this out, and you're bringing this out just to get answers for or at least a basic explanation as to what's happening from this data standpoint. Well, and that's one of the problems when you're dealing with complex litigation like things involving this issue would be it takes time to go through discovery to get answers. And I can't help think that the people that engaged in the fraud, we're counting on the fact that a new president is sworn in, whether the same one so we're sworn in or a new one sworn in on January twentieth, and that's not enough time to find all the fraud the different ways we've engaged in it, and so it is important that it be ferreted out. But it's difficult in the government. Yeah, you know that. You bring up an excellent point, and one of the things that has been so frustrating for us. Now that we've put together a data integrity group. It's full of data scientists, which full of mathematicians and experts in numbers, through un and artificial intelligence, you name it, and we've built a system that allows us to identify where errors or anomalies, you can call it fraud or not, we don't know. We don't know what the actual cause of it was. But when we start to dig into it. Every time we try to go and look at the actual source of it, we get stonewalled by the local agencies, by either from the Secretary of State level or even We had a big series in Georgia where we were supposed to be able to go in and look at dominion machines across five different counties and I'm only saying their name because they're one of the groups that we were looking at, and we were blocked the day before we were to fly in from seeing anything. And it's it's hard to imagine when you've got since the election, three respected national polsters who have come out and said that a majority of elections believe this election was either fraudulent or so error filled that it's invalid. A majority believes that we had an election like a third world country or a or a you know, a Banana Republican. It's hard. We've got data scientists who are wanting to go in and willing to go in, and we have the questions. We know the questions that need to be asked because we now see the data and where there were problems specifically, I'll give you an example in Georgia, we had over a hundred different precincts in the Fulton County area that had the mail in ballots come in at a ninety percent or greater four one candidate Joe Biden, and from a statistical standard, can't have two three can It doesn't happen. But we saw that replicated across the number of states. And and one of the things that can answer some of these questions. Everywhere where we had ballot stannerds is those every one of those ballots is scanned and in a memory card. And I don't understand since the public owns those that information owns those ballots. And it's my understanding, sir, and you can tell me if I'm wrong, But all federal ballots have to be kept for two years. Well, they're supposed to be in. Some states have different rules and laws, and we're about out of time, But let me just say go back to this. I've talked to Rudy Giuliani about it and Sydney pal they're both quite familiar with it. The doctrine dispoliation when times of the essence, if one party gets rid of evidence refuses to produce it, then the court should take and take notice that it is an admission that the evidence proves what the plane is trying to say. So listen, tell people right quick, cow to how they can follow up with your information that you're digging out. Well, yes, Congressman, we're actually releasing We release three videos on Rumble and we're gonna release a further one and has goes into more detail about all these things and also releases our methodology and the code that we use and everything like that, so everybody can go and replicate it. All right, Yeah, okay, that's right. Time is out. But I'm thank you so much for the work you're doing. This is the Sean Hannity Show, and we will be right back. This is the Sean Hannity Show. This is Louie Gomertz sitting in for Sean and uh, you know that was big and rich bumper music coming in. But yeah, John has a swimming pool on top of his house and my name tag blew off. And when I went to tell him that window is right there into the side of the pool, and John, I'm worried my name tag is gonna clog up your filter some now. He said, we got a grinder, it'll grind it up. And he said, yeah, we all watched your name tag float by the window and everybody said, look, Louie Gomert's name tag is floating by the window. That's what you can do when you got a window into the side of your pool. But anyway, and speaking of John, one guy went all through school with the mount Pleasant went to four years of A and M with He said about our last guests, Hey, did he say rumble? Where where can we watch his video? Well, it is rumbled and apparently that's an alternative to YouTube for conservatives where conservatives don't get censored and the truth can come out. So that's a good thing. But it's rumble dot com. And it's election not Returns, right, Linda, it's Election Night facts. It sounds like returns. Yeah, Okay, Election Night Facts on rumbell dot com. So you go to rumball dot com put in Election Night facts and you will find the video that our last guests were talking about. Now our guests we have with us. Now she's a friend as she's from Texas, and actually started knowing more about her. I heard about her. I knew she had a great, terrific book that exposed corruption in the Department of Justice, a License to Lie. But Sydney Powell was a tremendous help to Mike Flynn until she ran into a criminal defense attorney that thought or he thought he was a criminal prosecutor. Actually even though he was a federal judge, he kept trying to prosecute. He should be impeached, I think. But nonetheless, Michael Flynn is out from under the savage misuse and injustice that the DOJ hurled at him. And I'm glad to have Sidney Powell on. Sydney great to have on. And actually you and I, you know, a couple of years ago, were immersed in the fraud that was found to have occurred in the Dallas County election two years ago, and it was just we couldn't get people that had authority to do what needed to be done to save the country from going through what we've been through. But you've continued to go after this and their independent attorneys going after the fraud. And I know you're one person Sydney that can verify that all of the fraud has not been debunked. It's not unfounded. So tell us about what you've been finding. Oh, Louis, you're absolutely right. I mean, they're stunning mathematical and statistical evidence in data that's absolutely irrefutable of massive amounts of votes just disappearing from the system in the hundreds of thousands. And we know, for example that in Michigan and Antrim County, when we actually examine the dominion voting machines, forensic experts did that there. They have this way of sending votes computer wise to what they call adjudication and then they can just disappear them and they did that for more than eighty percent of the votes. So somebody can just drag and drop the drop them to the trash file. Well, it's pretty amazing. Of course, we heard that the machines were never hooked up to the internet, not accessible by the Internet, and yet in Georgia we had one of the workers saying yeah, when there was a problem with one of the voting machines or an iPad, then they'd contact their people. And I believe it was Dominion folks, wasn't it that would access her iPad access of voting machine and get them fixed from a remote location. I'm not sure how you do that without having those equipment accessible through the internet. Is there are a way to do that otherwise? No, it has to be it was accessible through the Internet, and that's an automatic violation of the federal law that requires voting machines to be protected from any sort of intrusion like that. And we also know they erased certain files on the machines in Antrim County, specifically the adjudication files that would have shown exactly where they put those votes that went missing. And there is evidence from other people in other states that machines were connected from to the Internet. Evidence from people in multiple states that people uploaded thumb drives of information to the machine. They can inject votes and create votes from thin air. They have done that. It appears in any number of places. This election is the biggest crime in American history, and there was in fact foreign interference in it. We already have a finding from the FBI and sizis cisaposed Election Security Division of Homeland Security that there was foreign interference by Iran in this election. We have traced internet information to Serbia, China, Iran. It was visible to people who were watching the night of the election and their data packages they call them, that were transferred between foreign countries regarding our election. The server in it's owned by sital, one of the companies related to Dominion in Germany. In Frankfurt, Germany spiked thirty percent the night of our election. Unbelievable, unreal. When now Sydney, you mentioned SEISA, the cyber security and Infrastructure Security Agency that was headed by Christopher Krebs, and I saw a puff piece on him the day of the election in which he assured us that this would be the most secure election ever, totally secure, no chance of any problems. Are you telling me that you have full faith in credit in what Christopher Krebs has to say. Well, mister Krebs is either incompetent or a liar, because when he spoke the day of the election, he was ignoring an statement publicly issued by the FBI and his organization. A few days before that found that Iran had intentionally interfered in this election election and gotten information of over two hundred thousand voters out of minimum. Well, I have to get information to manufacture votes and distort the entire voting process. Well, sometimes people like to take all the credit. But to his credit in that same Election day article, he gave a lot of credit to his dear friends in Silicon Valley for all of their help in making sure everything was the way it was supposed to be in our cyber security for our elections. So I guess you and I need to give some credit to Silicon Valley for all their help in creating a voting system such as it was. And again, you know I'm prone to sarcasm, but right, yeah, we need to give them a lot of credit, all right, Because Mark Zuckerberg spent over four hundred million dollars to affect the vote and create all kinds of issues for lawful voting in any number of states, particularly the swing states where we're seeing the problems. The Thomas Moore Society amis dot project has documented a lot of that. I haven't even had a chance to review all that evidence. We've been focused on the fraud that occurred across the country as a result of the voting machines. And I'm not just talking about Dominion. They all used the same software, and we're finding more and more evidence that they ran an algorithm in the machines that automatically flipped a certain percentage of votes from Biden from Trump to Biden to give Biden a two point seven percent flip, which amounts to like a five point five percent edge. Well, you know, we have testimony from the CEO of Dominion Voting Systems, John Polis, and he made some statements in testifying that we're pretty dramatic. He said that voting systems are by design meant to be used as closed systems, not networked, meaning they're not connected to the internet. He said that Dominion does not have any ties to Smartematic. Add Dominion and Smartematic are two separate companies. He said, we do not use or license Smartematic software. But as I understand it, Smartematic software has been incorporated into Dominion Voting Systems since two thousand and four. Was that your understanding, Yes, that's my understanding. And there's also a lawsuit between the two of them that documents their relationship. Tracy Bean's Tracy b e A n Z on Twitter has a lovely thread that includes the documents themselves so people can look at it themselves and see what they think the relationship between Smartmatic and dominion is. In their own words, Well, you know, we've got people that are asking what can be done about all of this fraud. I mean, somebody needs to suffer some consequences of the fraud. What would you suggest? You've seen this from a whole lot of different angles, Sidney, Well, I don't think the president is being well represented at all. In fact, I think everyone around him is misrepresenting thanks to him, and misleading him and not serving him well in any way, shape or form. Because he has the absolute authority under the Executive Order entered in twenty eighteen on election security that already declared a state of emergency for it and cites all the relevant statutes and authorities that he can use to secure the voting machines that need to be assessed around the country, have them assessed, appoints special counsel to oversee it all and get that done right now. I have no doubt that if the shoe had been on the other foot and the Democrats had been in power with the magnitude of fraud we've seen running across this country in every way, shape and form, whether it's dead voters, double voting, massive injections of false, fake ballots into the system of five systems stopping across the country. The night of the election, which has never happened before, lies from the Atlanta Fulton County Arena, the documented videotape of people pulling buckets some ballots out from under a table after they've run everybody off with a lie. And we've got thousands of affidavits all uploaded or a lot of them uploaded at Defending the Republic dot org so people can see the evidence and testimony themselves, including the expert reports. If the shoe had been on the other foot, if this had happened when Obama was in office, and this method and madness had been used to defeat him, they would have seized the machines the day after the election. But the bought it immediately. There's a big difference. Though. There would have been a whole bunch of Republicans that would have been encouraging that so we could get to the bottom of the fraud. Some of us have spoken up when Republicans have acted inappropriately or abuse somebody's rights under the Fourth Amendment. But it just doesn't seem that we get any of those people that sometimes claim they're really concerned about civil rights, sitting about our heights under the Constitution. They seem to go completely silent unless they're belittling those of us that just want justice. Yes, they're the ultimate hypocrites, Louis, Because even Senator Warren and Klobaschar and some others in December of twenty nineteen were complaining about the Venezuelan connection and the corruption in the dominion systems. And Carolyn Maloney was one of the congressmen who ten years ago or so called it out and tried to get the government not to approve its use whatsoever. And you know who spread its use none other than Eric Holder through an antitrust settlement in the Justice Department when he was there, and expanded the use of the dominion machines. Well, and yet there's a picture of President Obama voting on one for the first time in Chicago, as if it's a big accomplishment. Well it was for them. They knew exactly what they were doing goodness. They are behind all of this and more. But the government of China is trying to steal the United States of America. They've bought us in any number of ways, from any number of our companies, to our ports, to our real estate all over the country. Now they have donated millions, hundreds of millions to universities to steal our technology and data. Evident Trump's the only person who has tried to rain them in on any of it, and that's why they have been determined to take him out. Well, thank you, Sydney, thanks for your fight. You are a great American patriot warrior, and thank you for that. This is the Sean Hannity Show. Louie Gomert will be right back. This is the Sean Hannity Show, and we're glad with you. Howard. Let's hear from you in Wilmington, North Carolina, Bank conversman. Thanks for taking my call. Of course, I'm gonna get right to it. Yeah, with all with all of the corruption that's going on, and I mean throughout the whole damn government, even the Supreme Court. Ye, it's terrible, it is. What do it is? It's ridiculous. We have no representation the patriots are really I'm telling you there, I don't know how much long we are going to stay quiet. Well that's you and me both. But so what do we do? Yeah, it's a it's a great question. We ought to be able to go to the courts. The courts have shut people out, they have not been willing to do their jobs. It's not a great answer. But what we've got left is the people to get upset. And you know, some have proposed coming to Washington on January sixth. But we have got to make sure that this fraud is exposed. And I don't know what else to do except get it to the people and also get it out in Congress. And we need the sentence help to do that. But appreciate the question. We'll be right back with more of the Sean Hannity Show. We've got Andy Biggs coming back with more Brooks and Paul Goes on this is What's right with America. You're listening to the Sean Hannity Show. This is the Sean Hannity Show. This is Louis Golmbert sitting in and I've got some great friends that are joining me here on Sean's show. Mo Brooks has put together a great strategy for January sixth. It would be better if the courts had done their job and then it would be a koe of government that could work together. But they haven't done their jobs. So we have got to use every tool at our disposal. In Arizona, Andy Biggs and Paul Gozar have been pushing to have the legislature there in Arizona do the right thing. So, guys, welcome to the Sean Andy Show. I know the public is really interested. They have been calls wanting to know what can we do? What can we do? And you and all four of us were talking yesterday and we did have a meeting at the White House. What's let people know what the strategy is. Well, the strategy is to at this point make sure that we have a United States Senator who has the courage and the understanding, the intellect to co sponsor the objections that we can have a serious discussion on the House and Senate floor about the magnitude of the voter fraud election theft that occurred on and before November third, twenty twenty, affecting not only the presidential race, but also any number of House Senate and other races up and down the ballot. So all the listeners who hear my voice, I strongly encourage you to write, call your senators in congressman too. It can't hurt, but particularly your senators, to help give them the backbone they need to stand tall for our republic that is underpinned by our election system. And if we don't have an honest and accurate election system, you do not have a republic. And I'm afraid that's where we're headed. Well, that is exactly where we're headed. And when people work and connive and scheme to prevent a free and fair election, that's exactly where we're headed. As we know, socialism it requires a totalitarian government, no middle class, just a tiny ruling class and then everybody else. And we are all determined to make sure that to do everything we can to keep that from happening. Now, Andy and Paul, Uh, did the Arizona Legislature have hearings today? Yeah? So so, Louis. What happened is Uh, there there's been hearings and the board of Supervisors who controls the machines. This is for an audit. They want to forensic audit. The supervisors said, they didn't want to turn over the machines or any of the documents, um and and they basically disregarded the legislative. So the legislature literally right before we got on with you, they were having a hearing with a judge here, and they're going to continue having a hearing. They're gonna have a hearing tomorrow again to see whether the court will help enforce and rid of man damis against the Board of Supervisors. All of the Board of Superviel. Yeah, we want to do an audit, but they're dragging their feet because they're trying to run out the clock. But the legislator, but the legislature has and will continue fighting this matter, both in court and whoever else they can get it. And then this would all be a lot easier if the governor would just call the legislature into a special session, but he refuses to do so, Paul, was your thought, so Andy, I epitomizes it just right. But it's sad, Louis when you see a board of supervisors so entrenched, I mean, and these are Republicans for crime and his sake, Why wouldn't you want to extol the virtues of a good election. No, because I know we had some chicanery in twenty eighteen in regards to the Senate race, you know, because of Adrian Fontz. But do you know what. The people are the governed, and they're the government, and they have to be able to hear from everybody. So I gotta tell you boths starting allowed and clear. Call them, write the text them, do anything possible, email them. This is up to you. We want a fair election. If we don't have that, we have nothing. Well, and not just in Arizona. That's needed there, it's needed in Georgia, it's needed in Wisconsin. It's needed in Michigan and Pennsylvania. These are all critical, just very critical, and people need to make sure that their elected representatives understand we're in a fight to save this little experiment in self government and we're on the verge of losing it. And these clown Republicans that think, oh gee, if I act, you know, charitable and kind and tell Trump to just go ahead and give in, give way to this fraudulent conclusion, then I'll look better and I can be the Republican elected in twenty twenty four, not really grasping that if we let the fraud go this time, there won't be another Republican elected president. So this is critical stuff, and I am so grateful to all three of you for the way that you stand and fight. This is very important. So we're gonna we know there was fraud. I don't know there was fraud in Texas, but since the President won Texas despite the fraud, there's no use in raising that and objecting on the House floor. When the Senate joins us there on January sixth, one of the questions we had is what else can we do besides January sixth? It seems to me that's the best chance we have left. When the Justice Department doesn't do their job, the FBI has got too many people that are trying to push well, they've been trying to push the president out the door for four years, so I don't know of another shot. This seems to be our best chance to educate people the fraud is not unfounded, and any other recommendations based on the fraud that you've already seen, well, this is pretty much it for our country. This is a pivotal moment in American history. In my judgment, it rivals the election of eighteen sixty between Douglas and Lincoln, and we saw what ensued from that. This is the time when the socialists, by hook or by crook, by theft, or by otherwise intend on gain power in the United States of America. And once they get power, given how they're gonna legally and illegally manipulate so many different systems in parts of our government, our country will probably be lost down the socialism path. And you know, ultimately we will suffer debilitating insolvency, in bankruptcy, because that is what happens to socialist countries as soon as you, as Margaret Thatcher used to say, run out of other people's money. And I don't think people understand the depravity, the dangerousness of what occurs when a country goes in solvent, in bankrupt But I would encourage them to look at economic history right now. You can look at Venezuela. It's not a pretty sight what's happening in Venezuela, with people losing their lives, fleeing the country as best they can in order just to get food on the table for themselves and their kids. We don't want to go there, but that's what the socialist movement in America is doing right now and where they will take us if we don't stop them. So we need to win these two elections in Georgia. We need to fight as best we can in the face of the expected voter fraud and election set activities that the Socialists will engage in there, and then on January the sixth. This is somewhat ken to the Alamo, although I hope we will survive. But it was the Alamo where you had courageous people stand tall that had a great contributing effect in the creation of the nation of Texas later become a state of Texas. Well. It's true, and you know, I know we have a lot of Christian brothers and sisters in Congress. And one of the things that frustrates me is when I hear other members of Congress say, Louis, we don't have to worry. God's in control. He's in control. And I haven't met Tommy Nelson, he's abassador in Dent, Texas, but I listened to a Bible study where one of his statements was, yeah, God's a sovereign, He's in control. But just because he's in control, don't mean he wants us to lean on our shovel and pray for a whole. Everybody has tools they have been given and everybody needs to use every means at their disposal, will at their disposal lead glee and ethically to make their feelings heard. Make sure that the representatives and senators understand that they're not going to put up with them allowing us to just slip into that good night of socialism. Paul, you've been a fighter as long as I've known you. Any other thoughts on what people can do, Yes, educate yourself. There's a there's a movie, as heiled by HBO. The Democrats actually made it. It's called Kill Chain. It is worth it your one hour. It will scare the living to Jesus out of you about these machines called dominion and smart startmatics. Folks. I mean, this is right in front of us. This has happened different rueways in each of these different states, and I implore you make those calls. Get this back, this liberty and freedom that in this experiment has really talked about this republic. This happened. We've got to make sure that we corrected. And there's no there's no reason why the voters out here in Arizona or in Michigan or Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia shouldn't have an accounting about the education, education about the voting that it is true and rightfully done. Yeah. Well, I'm thrilled with the help that we've got. We've got some great stout new members of Congress coming in that'll be sworn in on January third, so they will be there and their fighters is really encouraging. We've got lots of new members in the Freedom Caucus and Andy, any other thoughts about what people you would encourage people to do as we approach the D day really for the new administration. Yeah, first of all, thanks thanks Louis and Moe and Paul, great fighters members of the Freedom Caucus. Al, thank you for what you guys do. The second thing I would tell you is you can still talk to your governors, your legislators, your state legislators. They can also put up if they're in a special session or session, they could send up an alternative slate in these states that are sent up bidens that are in these critical fraud states. If they were to send up alternative electors, that would be beneficial as well. That's as good well, thoughts yeah, I concur with that, and I hope Arizona will be a leader in this effort. From where I understand the Arizona legislator is very active with her from Paul Gosar and any Biggs concerning that. But if they will be more aggressive in contesting the election as they see it, exposing the fraud that has occurred and then make a public statement as to who they believe the real electors to the Electoral College from the state of Arizona are, that can have an earthquake like effect on legislators in Pennsylvania, wesconsin Georgia, and elsewhere. So Arizona take the lead in this help us out well. And if people follow Arizona's lead and they do that, I mean they can vote to desertify, uncertify the electors based on all the fraud. They could vote to certify Trump electors because of all the fraud. You take out the fraud and clearly Trump was the winner. It's obviously where this stands. So others learn from that. You can send us electors that represent the real winner and that'll make it easier to come January six. So thank you all. You guys are great. Just to appreciate the meetings in time we have, including yesterday with you. Thanks so much, guys. This is Sean Hannity's show and it's just so great to be here for Sean. And thank you to the callers we've had been so patient. We're not going to be able to get to you. But great questions, great issues, and we tried to incorporate some of those. But listen, in this country's in trouble, and any country that was originally free that people did not spend enough time protecting that freedom, they lose. It's it's we're endowed by our creator, but it's not something you get to keep. There are always evil people that want to take away your endowment, your inheritance. We got to fight for this. And I'm not calling for revolution the fake media has tried to say I have. I'm calling for peaceful demonstrations to make clear we've got to protect this and those that have tried to take us down the road of socialism, destroy our history. How about this for history? Thomas Jefferson as our third president, recognized and actually selected Isaac Watts pal Palmp I'm sorry. Songs, hymns and spiritual songs for teaching the alphabet, teaching English, and Isaac Watts. Of course, one of his famous songs went, joy to the world, the lords come, Let earth receiver King. You know the words. That's part of our history. Let's defend our history. And that means if you sit back and you say nothing, and fraud decides this election because good people haven't raised up enough to raise kane about it, we'll lose it and generations to come will know it was our fault. Let's fight for what we have. God bless you all. Is Louis Goldmer, signing Alfred on handity