Impeachment Has Already Failed Once, Remember?

Published Oct 29, 2019, 10:00 PM

Jason Chaffetz, former Congressman and author of Power Grab,Power Grab: The Liberal Scheme to Undermine Trump, the GOP, and Our Republic, reminds the audience that the impeachment has already happened once, and it went absolutely nowhere. 

The Sean Hannity Show is on weekdays from 3 pm to 6 pm ET on iHeartRadio and Hannity.com.

Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

All right, glad you with us. You know, there comes a point in everybody's life. I'm mare's hoole. I'm not gonna take it anymore. I'm not at that point. But it is getting really, really, really difficult to hold back. What is just an anger that I have at what the mob and the media and the Democrats are doing to the country. It is they are so detached from any objective truth, fundamental fairness, honesty, intellectual honesty, intellectual curiosity, on and common sense reason. It is they're void of all of it. And I don't care if it's you know, even you know bagdaddy. They can't praise the president for killing the world's number one most evil brutal terrorist and killing the guy's likely successor in the process of all this. They can't even bother. They're not going to pay any attention to Caleb Mueller's dad praising the president for leaving Democrats in the dark about the al Bagh Daddy raid because this mission was named after his humanitarian daughter, who was brutally killed after being raped by This isis evil, soob I mean, you know, it's it is beyond anything that I have ever witnessed in the thirty one years that I have now publicly been speaking out about politics on radio and now the twenty fourth year at the Fox News Channel. I've never I've never witnessed anything this ugly, twisted, sick, and I've never witnessed a let You have to suspend all adherence to truth, reality, reason, common sense. You have to apply the most glaring double standards to do and to be a Democrat today, and it seems like it is just taken over. You talk about mass hypnosis or a psychotic shift in thinking, but it is real. It's as real as anything I think I've ever seen in my life. You wonder sometimes how people could just lose it. You know, there is this phenomenon of cultures and societies, you know, where the people become brainwashed and doctrinated, mindless, thoughtless robots, and they just regurgitate and repeat whatever the line of the leaders of the madness tell them to repeat. And you wonder, how can that happen? And it's happened again and again throughout history, and it's pretty scary that it keeps happening. You know, all this talk about Baghdaddy, is there anybody out there in the Democratic Party that's gonna say thank you, good job, mister President. I know that's a stretch, right, Piers Morgan. Literally they're shaming themselves and they don't seem to be shame of bull if that makes any sense. This was an incredible successful the operation. The world is better off, it's safer, more secure today. You know, Kamala Harris, the best she could do is it was like, oh, his comments, he was acting like a you know, he's commenting on a video game. That's all you can muster. You know. The austere intellectual, as the Washington Post said, dies at age forty eight, that's not who this guy was. He was a radical, sick, deranged, evil Islamist that killed hundreds of thousands, that inspired an instructed terror around the world, that literally would chop people's heads off him and his henchman and burn people alive in cages and I guess take joy out of doing it. That is the evil that was destroyed this weekend. But the mp MPR is praising Baghdaddy is he was a real leader, a movement we've never seen before. Wow. And on top of the austere intellectual the Washington you have a Washington Post columnist, Hey The assertion that Baghdaddy died as a coward was in any case contradicted by the fact that he would rather than be captured. He blew himself up. What that's the coward in him? What part of that don't you understand? Have to delete that fake news CNN the forty one most shocking lines from Trump's Baghdaddy announcement. They are so hung up on two things that number one, the President didn't tell Pelosi and the corrupt, compromised cowards shift the congenital liar that he is, and why should he because none of them can keep their mouth shut. We've never had in a moment in history where a president's conversations with prime ministers and presidents was being leaked and released to the public. But they're upset about that. They're also upset about the president said he he died after running into a dead end tunnel, whimpering and crying and streaming all the way. He died in a vicious, violent way, as a coward, running and crying, Oh, I'm so sorry it offends you. Then you've got area fifty one Rosvo Rachel Manow's MSDNC channels. You know that this raid shows flaws in Trump's foreign policy. It happened despite of him, and that's pretty much the entire media. Jamie Lee Curtis, he may have died a coward at real Donald Trump at all. Living things suffer when they're blown up. Oh we're supposed to feel bad that he suffered. The murderer died. I mean imagine saying this, and I don't like Hitler analogies, never use them, but it's mass murder on that scale. It's evil. On that scale of evil. You don't have a conscience and a soul if you're just gonna cut people's heads off, you don't like and disagree with, or burn people and get pleasure out of watching them burn to death after you set them a blaze in a cage or that you literally wipe out the pretty much the large portions of the UCD Christian community in northern Iraq, and you capture women and children and use them as sex slaves. That also was part of the m of isis. So you got that madness all unfolding. Then we've got the impeachment insanity madness that is happening as well. Now you have to suspend. This is how hypocritical you must be if you are a member of the MOB or a Democrat, you have to just forget that. You know, you have to believe that Russian interference is wrong, but only if it's Donald Trump. You can't ever talk about the bought and paid for dirty Russian dossier of Hillary Clinton. You can be outraged over obstruction of justice that never happened with Donald Trump, but you then have to forget the subpoenad, emails, deleted, bleach bit Hammer's devices, no simcard. You have to just not talk about that part. You have to be okay with the dirty Russian dossier, which we now know is unverifiable, and the up to five warnings given to the DOJ and superpatriots like James Comey saying don't trust Christopher Steele saying in a FISA application it's verified because it says verified on top of it. Not verify it, but use it any way to take away the civil liberties of one American and then find a way to spy on a candidate for president, then a transition team, and then the president. And you have to be okay with all of that, or the weaponizing by only the one percent in the intelligence community. The other ninety nine percent keep us safe and secure in a very dark, evil world today against enemies foreign and domestic. But the one percent that will weaponize these powerful tools we entrust to them and turn it on a president to spy on him an outsource, spying to our allies, to circumvent American laws. That is a big deal because you don't have a constitution. You have a police state at that point, and America and constitutional justice, law, equal justice under the law, equal application of our laws goes away. Now I know that you're thinking, well, well, maybe maybe Nancy Pelosi got the message. He's gonna be fair. She's now going to have this vote on Thursday. Well, Stanny Hoyer, who is the House majority whip, Well he's speaking today signaling he's not committing to the House Democrats voting this week to formalize their secret impeachment inquiry. Oh is you know we seeing little cracks in the in the madness rushed to impeach over nothing. And we'll get to that in a second, because there is a USA Today Suffolk poll out and that shows and I found that only thirty six percent of respondence support this House voting to impeach and remove the president. Twenty two percent say Congress should continue with their impeachment inquiry but should not vote to remove him. Thirty seven percent say lawmakers should end their impeachment probe, and four percent remain undecided. All right, that's twenty two percent in favor of continuing the inquiry but against removal. So that would be a fifty nine percent against removing the president. It's not going to happen in the House anyway. But you know, with everything that we're hearing, watching and saying, Ukraine is no different then obstruction of justice, the double standard with Hillary Clinton, no different than Russian interference with Hillary Clinton's dirty NASA that they ignored. The same thing is happening with Ukraine. Because we have the transcript. I don't care how many non whistle blowers hearsay whistle blowers or people that heard the call that were alarmed and concerned, it doesn't matter. None of that matters, because we have the actual transcript, and in the transcript, it's very clear that the president is asking, after congratulating the new elected president of Ukraine, President Zelenski, hey I need a favor. You got to help us out here. We've spent three years now investigating twenty sixteen. You know, outside election interference by foreign entities, Your country was involved in it. How do we know that? Politico July twenty seventeen, they confirmed it. We also have a Ukrainian court, you know, a court in Ukraine. They determined that, in fact, Ukraine interfered in our twenty sixteen elections. So the president, remember he has an oath, we have a constitution, he's charged to faithfully execute the laws of this land. And the President saying I'd like your help to get to the bottom of that. And yeah, the President did mention. You know, if you again to be a Democrat, you can't apply the same standards. You can't be upset that Ukraine helped and interfered in our elections because that had nothing to do with favoring Donald Trump. You see, Ukraine was helping Hillary Clinton. If you care a lot about quid pro quos, well then you just have to ignore the quid pro quo of Joe Biden leveraging a billion taxpayer dollars, ragging about it and saying you got six hours to fire a Ukraine prosecutor or you're not getting the money, son of them be They fired him you have to ignore that part. Here's a quid pro quo right right there in front of us. What Democrat has spoken out about that known quid pro quo? They say it's a conspiracy theory. Well, if it is, Joe Biden is the one who launched it, and then you have to forget that Hunter Biden, the kid with no experience, he does the ABC interview. Have you had any experience with Ukraine? No oil, no gas, no energy. No. Why do you think they chose you? Why wouldn't they pick any other American to give millions of dollars too? I don't know. Do you think maybe it's because your father was the vice president and the second most powerful person in the US at the time. Yeah, probably, He says it, and they say, oh, that's got to be a conspiracy theory. You have to ignore that truth, those facts, that reality. To be a Democrat today, to be a member of the mob and the media today, it's never been this sick. It's never been this distorted, this ugly, this corrupt, this biased, this abuse you. It's like they're living on another planet. It's like invasion of the body snatchers. They don't even exist anymore. There is no rationalization in their minds. They just hate Trump. That rage, that psychosis goes that deep. That's how hypocritically corrupt they all are. It is really insane. These are not normal times, all right. So the Democrats released the statement on the House resolution. Here's the gist of this whole thing. They're not being fair anyway. They this. You gotta understand. This is secret Soviet Union style and impeachment cop attempt being run by a compromise corrupt Howard Schiff, who's also a congenital liar, and Jim Jordan was out there today said they're not even letting us ask anybody questions. They're behind closed doors. It is corrupt. But let me let me cut to the chase. None of it matters anonymous sourcing. It doesn't matter what people thought of the call. It doesn't matter what the whistle blower non whistle blower, heresay whistle blow. None of it matters because you got the transcript. When you get the transcript, you get to read it yourself and you get to see what that a president not only did he not do anything wrong, you see, the president is faithfully executing the laws of the land. Well, he has a constitutional sworn oath and duty. We also have a treaty with Ukraine that they will work in criminal matters. The idea that all those people that thought that election interference was so horrible for three years, well they don't want to hear about Ukrainian election interference. And the president rightfully, faithfully executing asking and what American is gonna look me in the eye and tell me Joe Biden bragging about shaking down, quit pro quoting Ukraine to fire the prosecutor, or they get no money or Hunter Biden's no experience in oil, gas energy, or Ukraine did why'd you get the job? The millions my daddy. I think most of you know that chairmanship has prevented the witness from answering certain questions we have during the deposition. You know, one of the things you're doing these depositions is you ask the basics, what windwhere? Why? He asked those questions. When we asked the whistleblower who he spoke to after important events in July, Adam Shift says, no, no no, no, We're not going to let him answer that question. Even though at the start of every one of these depositions, and you all know this already, every one of the start of every single one, he says, this is not classified. He tells us that the witness has their counsel there there, the lawyer there. They don't need Adam shift being chairman and lawyer. But that's in effect what happened today, and he would not let the witness And look the Democrats run out here and say, oh, the Republicans are trying to figure out who the whistle blower is. We're trying to figure out who a witness lis is. If the resolution that the Speaker has just filed. At some points he points us out in the resolution this is going to go to the Judiciary Committee, if in fact they push it there, there will be witnesses called. We'd like figure out who those witnesses should be so the American people can get the facts, get the truths, and we know who these individuals are. So that it seems interesting to me that chairmanship is so sensitive, I mean, whined out last week. There are four hundred and thirty five members of Congress. One of them one of them, only one of them knows who the whistleblower is. More importantly, who the sources are for the whistleblower that were the basis of him following this complaint, and somehow he doesn't want anyone else to know that him and him, mister Ship and his staff are the only ones in America who can know and his evidence about his sensitivity. You saw it on display today when we try to ask the witness certain questions and mister Ship would not let him answer. Jim Jordan, Ohio twenty five to the top of the hour. Do you hear what he's saying. They're preventing the witnesses from answering the questions. The reason the ship is compromised. He's corrupt, he's a coward, and he's a proven congenital liar. Now I'm reading this, this resolution that they is released as a joke. Now, just to give you background, remember when New Gingrich Republicans, when the impeachment of Bill Clinton went on, they had a full House vote authorizing the impeachment inquiry. So they're trying to like threat a needle and appear to be fair, But once you get into the details, they're not doing what New Gingridge did by any stretch. For example, newt allowed the full House at every critical step to define the scope and establish the rules and procedures. That's not what they're dictating them. And I'll explain in a minute. They allowed co equal subpoena power for the chair and the ranking member. That's not allowed. As you get into the details of this resolution, New Gingrich allowed subpoena is be subject to a vote of the full committee at the request of the chair of the ranking member. New Gingrich allowed Clinton's counsel the right to attend all hearings in depth positions. That's not happening so far with the president. Allowed the President's counsel the right to present evidence. Allowed the president's counsel, meaning Clinton's, the right to object to admitting certain evidence. The president's counsel the right to cross examine, the president's counsel the right to recommend the witness list. Now let me just as I read this, So the resolution starts out directing certain committees to continue their ongoing investigations as part of the existing House of Representatives inquiry into whether or not sufficient crowns exist for the House of Representatives to exercise its constitutional power to impeach Donald J. Trump President of the United States, and for other purposes. And then they have the resolution that the Committee on Intelligence and the Committees on Financial Services, Oversight, etc. Etc. Are directed to continue their ongoing investigations. By the way, what that means is, this is a let's have every committee investigate, investigate, investigate, do nothing for the American people and see if anything sticks. This is a phishing expedition Resolution number one. Then it goes into for the purpose of continuing the investigation described in the first section, a permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. This is where it is led by the compromise corrupt coward Shift, the congenital liar that's they're using his committee. They're authorized to conduct proceedings pursuing too. The resolution at the chair of the Select Committee shall designate an open hearing or hearings pursue into the section notwithstanding Ruled eleven of the House of Representatives, upon recognition of the purpose of blah blah, blah blah. Here's where they go sideways again. Well, number one, they're so deep into the process. They're allowing every committee basically to continue the ongoing investigation into impeaching the president. But they don't have any reasons for any of it, and we don't need any witnesses anyway, because we've got the transcript. That's the sick part of all of this. But then this is where it gets interesting. The Chair and the ranking minority Member shall be permitted to question witnesses for equal specified periods of longer than five minutes, as determined by the compromised corrupt coward congenital liar shift. The time for each period questioning under this paragraph shall be equal for the Chair and the ranking minority member. Sounds fair, right, No, it's not because the compromised corrupt coward shift the liar well, he's the one the chair make. It goes on for equal amount of time. But the Chair may confer recognition for multiple periods of such questioning, but each period of questioning shall not exceed ninety minutes in the aggregate, and only the Chair and the ranking Minority member or permanent Select Committee employee if yielded. If yielded by the chair, I mean, do you understand what they're doing here? If they ever got the whistleblower in the chair, which started all of this, the whistleblower would then be questioned extensively about the contact with the compromise corrupt coward chiff, And just like they they'd have to answer questions about the relationship with Biden. So they don't want that person. And they're going to prevent the Republicans from ever doing any of this. They're going to quote allow full evaluation of minority witness requests. Full evaluation of request. That doesn't mean they can do it. They have to go through the compromise corrupt coward Adam Schiff. And by the way, they may submit to the chair another word, shift in writing any requests for witness testimony relevant to the investigation described in a section of the resolution within seventy two hours after notice is given for the first hearing designated pursuant to paragraph one, any such request shall be a companied by a detailed written justification of the relevance of the testimony of the requested witness to the investigation described in the section of the resolution. What does that mean? It means the compromised corrupt shift can say no, Like if the whistleblower is called in, he will say no. He knows they can't do that because as soon as they do, he gets exposed as being a fact witness compromised in the case. So he'll have the final determination. So this whole resolution is one big smokescreen. They're trying to act fair. They're trying to, you know, seem like they're doing what New king Ridge did without doing any of it. And it goes on. The ranking member is the ranking minority member is authorized with the concurrence of the Chair. Again, you need the reminds corrupt coward Shift's approval to require is deemed necessary to the investigation. Again, you have to get Daddy's permission. Daddy's compromised, Oh, cowardly Shift, compromise Shift, But anyway, you have to get his permission by subpoena, otherwise that you would deem necessary to the investigation. The attendance and testimony of any person, including at taking a deposition that doesn't guarantee the rights of the minority or the President's Council. The production of books, records in other words, admitting evidence. Again, you have to has to be authorized with the concurrence of the Chair to have the attendance and testimony of any person, to produce records, correspondence in other words, evidence by interrogatory furnishing of information. In the case that the Chair declines to concur meaning Shift, the compromise leader in this which hunt is in a proposed action of the ranking minority member, the ranking Minority Members shall have the right to refer the Committee for decision the question whether such authorities shall be so exercised, and the Chair shall convene the Committee properly to render that decision. Well, there's a little problem there. What is the exact number. There's far more numbers. There's far more Democrats on the committee than Republicans. So the deck is stacked there because the Democrats will protect their fearless compromised leader. This is nothing, you know. This is again, it's an ongoing secret Soviet style impeachment coup attempt and the worst part of all of this, and I'll stop because it's full of basically, well, you'll have the right to ask, but we won't ever give it to you. You have the right to ask for anything, we won't give it to you. We'll stacked again. We just want to appear fair when we're not being fair. Now, the Justice Department today ruled on this very issue. They did their own investigation in the Justice Department, their Criminal Division into investigating Trump's conversation with the Ukrainian president about Joe Biden and it concluded that the President did not violate any campaign finance law, and as I said, the President was faithfully executing the laws of the land. These people supposedly cared about election interference. They didn't care about the dirty Russian dassier. They only cared about Trump election interference. Four separate investigations proved they didn't exist, culminating with three years the Muller investigation. Sorry, that failed. So now they're just going to stack the deck, and they're gonna do it in secret. They're gonna stack the rules in their favor a resolution that is so corrupt of itself to protect the compromise leader of this witch hunt. That would be the compromise corrupt coward, congenital lie or schiff. And this is not worth the paper it's printed on. There's not due process in this at all, not even they're just trying to make it appear like they're offering what nuke Kingrich offered. They're not doing any of the things New kingridch did anyway. The separate a separate division of the Department of Justice. Justice also ruled today that the Trump administration did not break the law by failing to quickly share a whistleblower's complaint with Congress, saying the matter didn't meet the definition of urgent that would trigger the law. Well, it wasn't even a whistle blower. It was a hearsay whistle blower, a non whistleblower, whistle blower that now has to be kept out of the public eye because there was contact with the cowardly shift's office. I've never seen anything like this now. Bill mcgerna had a good piece in the Wall Street Journal today that Nancy Pelosi's sudden change and the rules of impeachment is because the polls are going south and impeachment is now beginning to backfire. We now are seeing this in the pole I mentioned in the last half hour. We're beginning to see cracks. And here's what's happening. The American people are now understanding that this is nothing but a continuation of what has been never ending, a NonStop effort to undo the results of a twenty sixteen election. They've now talked since day two after Donald Trump was elected about impeachment. They did it all through twenty seventeen, all through twenty eighteen. I've run the timeline on TV. I'll run it again tonight and all through twenty nineteen, and now not only is it about undoing the election of twenty sixteen that they never accepted the results of. They always thought Mueller was going to do the work for them. And they're not going to be put in the position of waiting three more years to try it again. They're just going to do it themselves. And they're never going to allow any type of fair process to go on because that's not who they are. And Democrats key impeachment witness. We just found this out today. Breitbart had an article which is pretty interesting that Bill Taylor, the US Ambassador to Ukraine, who provide a key testimony to the Democrats on this impeachment, well apparently let an election observation delegation in Ukraine earlier this year. Apparently some connected group to Sorrows, according to Breitbart at the time, boasted Hunter Biden on their board as their council chairman for a guy with no experience as kids making a ton of money. And this is what you have to believe. It didn't matter. You only have you only have interference by foreign countries being bad if it has to do with Trump, not the Russian dossier obstruction is bad, but not Hillary's deleted emails. You have to care about foreign interference on our elections, but not the court decision in Ukraine that actually said they interfered in the US election to help Hillary Clinton. That's where Democrats are. You have to support impeachment and throw out all of these whistle blowers when you have a transcript that shows that the president was doing that which Democrats said they wanted for the last three years, and that is to look into election interference by foreign countries and stop it because that's what the president was asking the president of Ukraine to do, and that is relates to Biden. You really have to disconnect from any truth, reality, intellectual, honesty, reason, and common sense because you have to ignore the quid pro quo of leveraging a billion tax dollars to fire a Ukrainian prosecutor in six hours or he's taken his billion dollars home that's our money. Well, that would be a quid pro quo because he wanted the prosecutor fired. Now we know, because Hunter Biden admitted on an ABC no experience Ukraine, oil gas or energy, but they paid him millions. Wow, you have to think that's a conspiracy theory, but one that was spread by Hunter and Joe Biden themselves. And then you got to go ignore China completely. No experience there either. Ten days after he goes with his father to China, a billion dollars deal with the Bank of China. These are insane times, all right. Jason Schaffitz is going to wait in on all of the Senator Tim Scott's with us today. Democracy the posts happy Still, I've plogged the speaker for finally admitting it is a whole entire sham. But you can't put the genie back in the bottom. A due process starts at the beginning. It doesn't affirm a Missham investigation all the way through. If you were in the legal term, it'd be the fruit from the poisonous tree. It'd be a mistrial. None of this said, None of this information would go forward. But what's most important to the America in public. We all have the phone call, we all have the transcript. We are all able to see there was no quid pro quo, the money was released, Ukraine did nothing and no action was taken. Where's the crime, where's the impeachment, what's the impeachable offense. The American public sees that we should move on, and they continue to try to move a whole sham organization is not going to work. It is very clear the President did nothing wrong. So why are we continuing to go down this path just like we had to the last time Adam Shift lied to the American public simply because they disagree with the outcome. I do not question this man's service to this country. But you know what, people have different philosophical beliefs. Now we have the proof before is we are a country of a rule of law. There's nothing in there that's impeachable. But there is also a lot of challenges before us, the funding of the American troops, the funding of our budget, prescription drugs, our trade, our economy. But none of that is being done, None of that is being worked on because of the obsession that the Democrats have with the pegs. President very well said that is the House Minority leader. That would be Kevin McCarthy. We have the transcript. I mean wow, Now we got a new witness and he was on the phone call and he was nervous after he heard the phone call. What we now have the transcript of the phone call I mean the latest of the Democrats is I've been saying today, Well, it was an evolution of a quid pro quote. That doesn't work either, because in the beginning it was all quid pro quo. Now it's the evolution of a quid pro quo evolution, What are you talking about? Evolution? They got the money. It was you know here, they cared so much about Russia, Russia, Russia collusion, collusion, election interference, and we've got all the evidence. Oh, that's right. It didn't matter about Hillary's Russian dirty Daciera didn't matter. That's that's the insanity of all of this. You want to look a quid pro quo, Look at Look at Biden, Joe Biden bragging a billion taxpayer dollars. You got a fireman six hours, iron in six hours, or I'm taking the money. I'm going home, son of them be they did it. We want to talk about buying influence qui pro quos. Let's get the transcripts of Biden after of course, his son Hunter makes millions. No experience with Ukraine none zero zip, no experience and energy oil gas zero. Well, why did they pay you millions of dollars? Don't you have anything to do with your last name being Biden, your father being the second most powerful guy in the country probably. Oh, and that's supposed to be. Okay, this is not going forget the process. We have the transcript. There's nothing in the transcript. And that's why, Well, you have the corrupt, compromised, coward shift. He can't bring in the whistle blower. Whistle blow was dead, gone and buried now you know. But why because if they if they bring in the whistleblower, well, then the whistleblowers has to talk about the contact that they've had, which Chiff's office, and they have to talk about favoring let's see Joe Biden Joe three h three three. Oh. Anyway, Jason Chaffitz is with us. Come former congressman now Fox News colleague. His book Power Grab, The Liberal Scheme to Undermine Trump, the GOP in our Republic, which is all true. You know. One of the points you've been making. I notice you tweeted it out and you said it to me is the House did vote on impeachment in the proceeding failed. That was July seventeenth, twenty nineteen, and one hundred and thirty seven Democrats voted against moving forward. But they've really been all over this since two days after Trump was elected, all through twenty seventeen, twenty eighteen, and now twenty nineteen. We'll just make up a new reason. How are you, Yeah, thanks for having me on. Yeah. I just went back and reread the article that appeared in the Washington Post on January twentieth of twenty seventeen. Impeachment proceedings have begun. The resistance movement always had this goal in mind. I think one of the reasons it's getting highlighted and accelerated right now is that they this is just my own personal opinion, but they know that the Horrowitz report and the Durham investigation is in full throttle, and what a good time to have this come out. You already have Schiff and others trying to take swat at Horrowitz and Durham and say, oh, this is just Trump right, No, No, it's actually bigger than that. Now they're so nervous. You got the likes ofcom Clapper Brennan scared to death. This is now a full on character assassin. The beginning of the character assassination of Durham and the attorney general. That's now their new talking point. Yeah, and they've started that before. They've seen a sintella of the evidence. But it started from the day, you know, really when Donald Trump came down that escalate when he was sworn in, and they've all but they've you know, Muller, they thought, oh we got him, we got him now and you know, nothing clean slate for Donald Trump, so you know, they've got the pedal to the metal. The other thing, Sean, that strikes me is again, if Adam Schiff had any goods on Donald Trump when he had that hearing about just over a month ago, he would have sided the transcript verbatim. Instead, you know, he had to lie, had to make it up. I thought the House should have taken more action against Adam Schiffs on that case. But they don't have anything on Donald Trump. And the witness coming forward today, well who is this guy? Oh, I've got concerns. We didn't elect you to to voice your concerns. This is a political question. And guess what Donald Trump gets to make that decision. You know what the irony is and all of that is as I interviewed the President last Monday, a week ago, yesterday, the President said, I know there's nine hundred people on these phone halls. He knows it's being either recorded or transcribed in real time. If he was going to do something like a quid pro quo, he would have been there. He didn't. But what we what we've had a consistent pattern of are never trumpers deep state operatives. I've never seen a president bludgeon from within like this guy. You know, Nancy Pelosi, the corrupt compromise coward Shift. You know they're upset they weren't notified about the Baghdaddy raid. And it's like, well, you're leaking the transcripts of conversations with the president and prime ministers and other presidents. Why would he ever trust you? Yeah, No, there's no reason to trust him. Set. For the life of me, I cannot figure out how to Adam Shift still has a security clarant Yeah. I mean, the guy's the chairman of the Intel Committee. How do you even have a security clarance? At this point, he has demonstrated time and time again he lies, he cannot handle classified information, and he should be stripped of that security clarance. Agreed on all of it. Now here's where I think you have to be. You have to. You have to care about obstruction when there was none with Trump after for investigations, but ignore Hillary's private server deletions and hammers and bleach bit. You have to care about Russian interference, but not Hillary's bought and paid for Russian dossier that was then used at not verified, but used to get to spy on then candidate transition team and President Trump. You have to you know, you're okay with all of that, no complaints from any Democrats or anybody in the mob about that. Now you have to care about a phone call that fifty hundred people were listening to in real time, a whistleblower, where there's nothing the president to me on that call. As I've gone over, this is faithfully executing the laws of the country. Is saying get to the bottom of your election interference, which they said they cared about, but they don't. They dismissed the Biden eruption in all of this, which it's breathtaking to me, and they're still going to do this is that where we're headed. Well, what's going to be fascinating today? You remember Nancy Pelosi instituted a seventy two hour rule. Supposedly this resolution that's going to be you know, that's unveiled today. Nobody's yet really seen it and digested it. She said they're going to vote on Thursday, but it's Tuesday, so do the math. I don't know how they have any time to actually properly digest this. But supposedly it's an impeachment proceeding, but it's not. It's somewhere in between. And the backstory there and you've highlighted this Seawan is really Lindsay Graham in the effort of the Senate to get those fifty senators to sign on and really call the bluff, and Nancy Pelosi is saying, what you're doing is bogus and we're not going to swallow it. Here over at the Senate, Well, are they gonna allow the due process that Nuke Gingrich allowed in the case of Bill Clinton, because that question has not been asked. Are they going to be's parent? Are they going to now have all the witnesses in public? Are Are they going to allow the president's attorney's access to every deposition and every meeting and the right to question and subpoena and do their own thing like New King Ridge allowed or no. I don't think they are. I think look, Nancy Pelosi is three times impeachment has come up for a vote, three times in a row. It's failed. In fact, the last time when it came up in July, a record number one hundred and thirty seven Democrats voted against it. So she runs the risk of not getting to the finish line. But probably even more importantly, she doesn't want to give the likes of a John Ratcliffe and Collins and everybody subpoena authority to go call ther other witnesses. She doesn't want to have to hear the other side of the story from the Trump perspective. I don't think she wants to see that happen. What is there to subpoena If you have the transcript, either the president did something unlawful or didn't. I've read it again and again. I've read it again and again. He didn't. All right, let me switch topics on you for a second here, You know, Michael Harrowitz correct. The inspector Jerry Well very night wasn't he wasn't he appointed first by Obama? He was? He was appointed by Obama. He was unanimously confirmed in the United States Senate he's a man with impeccable credentials. He's done the two reports so far. Remember he recommended for disciplinary action or prosecution the director of the FBI, the deputy director of the FBI, and the deputy assistant director of the FBI. The only reason we have all these all these text messages is because the FBI said, no, we're not going to give them to you. We can't find them. Well, he went over to the Pentagon, got an algorithm done, and that's how we found all these texts from Struck and Page. I really like the guy. We have new messages just released today from Judicial Watch, a record showing contact between Struck Or that the DOJ at the time claimed they couldn't find mind And But before I get to those questions, I want to ask you, all right, so what can the American people. Here's what we know. We know that the dossier was unverifiable. We know that its own author, under oath, in an interrogatory, said I have no idea of any of it's true. So they didn't verify it, but it became the bulk of information to in the FISA application at the top of a FISER warrant. According to John Ratcliffe, it says verified. That would mean that we have and we know of at least five occasions where the DOJ, the FBI, we're all worn, don't trust Steel. This is before the first application, and we also know McCabe said, well, no dossier, no FISA warrant, so they used it anyway, unverified information? Is that not pre meditated fraud committed on a FISA court. I think what we're also looking for, Sean, is the interaction Well, well, you didn't answer that's an important question. Yes, yeah, no, it clearly is. But what you're also looking for the interaction before and after between Brennan Clapper and the senior Astroland there at the FBI. If there is evidence that they willingly and knowingly did this, you could put the documents there, But you also need to look at in real time, did these people know that they were defrauding the court. Then I think the Department of Justice is left with nothing but the need and the imperative to prosecute these people. All right, take a break here we have our good friend, Congressman Jason Chavis. All right, we continue with Congressman, former congressman, now Fox News colleague Jason Chaffitz. All right, so we have these new documents thanks to our friends at Judicial Watch. The contact Or and Peter Struck the weeks after the twenty sixteen election, and you have Lisa Page, you know, in a meeting that took place required attendees. Or Struck the FBI Deputy Assistant Director of Counterintelligence, and then Or attend to arrange a meeting which struck Page himself, and Bruce Schwarz sports rather and then Or writes to Struck and Page under the subject meeting, Bruce Schwartz, thanks again for taking time to chat. As I mentioned, I'd like to set up a short meeting. Would you be available? And Page responds, Unfortunately, Pete is briefing the house and tell community blah blah blah. Or responds to Page, no problem, and it goes on from there. At bottom line is we keep getting more information. It seems these figures keep popping up again and again. Do you believe that the insurance policy is what we now know it to be? Yeah, yes, I do. I think the insurance policy was there in place. Do you look at the timing? They stay it there in black and white, in real time in text messages. I think the Inspectors General have been looking at trying to verify even further with other documentation. You know, I think a lot of us were frustrated last time. You know, did they have nefarious political intent? And the Inspector General was, you know, hesitant on that. But the proactive actions that these people took where they overstepped, oh, why, that's where they really overstood. That's quick. Quit. When are we getting the report? I got a break like six months ago. It's exactly. It's pissing me off too. That's how I'll put that, all right, Jason Chaffitz, thank you, eight hundred nine one Sean. When we come back Senator Tim Scott, South Carolina, we'll get his take on the killing of Baghdaddy and of course this impeachment madness a much more great it killed ALVIGDADTI is both a military and political victory for the Trump administration, but some officials point out that it may say as much about the flaws in Trump's foreign policy as it does about how well it can work. He sounded not like a president of the United States. He actually sounded like Saddam Hussang after torturing people. Sounded like Momarkadafi after he went torture people. There's a long trail ahead of him actually finally releasing details, explicit detail, some of which sort of echoed, I'm frankly the crudeness he would often expect to him. Maybe from isis about the whimpering screaming back that I think from a standpoint of so symbolism and importance of the country U saw taking down the Laden had a lot more meaning than this. Can we at least agree that the world is a better place without this guy in it? Oh? Trump, will the Begdanni. It is unbelievable what these men did and for our country, and what the President did as far as not being afraid to engage in what was really a high risk operation. The press releases have been quite jubilant. They have been completely bipartisan congratulating President Obama. The American people are giving President Obama strong approval ratings for getting Osama bin Laden, but the Bush team is trying to grab the credit. President Obama showed this week he was as in the terrorist hunt as he was in president, as he was in the delegate hunt as a candidate back in two thousand and eight. All Right, twenty five toil the top of the hour. This is how ugly, demented, twisted, six psychotic the mob in the media, the Democratic Party has now become peers Morgan. I can't say it any better than him. As I said earlier, that they shame. They are shaming themselves and their country. Where's the Democrat that is saying, thank you, good job, mister president, great job. The guy that's killed hundreds of thousands, the guy that is responsible for the terror and brutality around the globe, the guy that would give orders to be head people and videotape it, or put people in cages and burn them to death or wiping out you see the Christians in northern Iraq and taking women and children and raping them repeatedly and turning them into sex slaves. Yeah, Kamala Harris, so well. Trump, the way you described it was like commenting on a on a video game. You got NPR praising this mass murderer is a real leader, a movement we've we've never seen before, talking about bagdaddy. You know you got the uh you know, Bozo O'Rourke. It succeeded despite Trump. They can't even can't say once good job then you got the Washington Post, the austere religious intellectual dies at forty eight. Uh no, that's not how you describe them. And you got one of their columnists, you know, having to backpedal even after that. The assertion that Baghdaddy died as a coward was in any case contradicted by the fact that, rather than be captured, he blew himself up. Oh okay, that is uh, that's not a coward. Couldn't stand being captured. I was afraid of American forces. And now they have more backlash there. They had to delete that tweet. You got fake news CNN. They literally forty one of the most shocking lines from Trump's Baghdaddy's speech, he died after running into a dead end tunnel, whimpering and crying and screaming the whole way. He died in a vicious, violent way, as a coward, running and crying. Oh I'm sorry. They're bad things to say. You got you know then, of course Area fifty one Roswell Rachel Maddow's channel ms d NC. The Baghdaddy raid chose flaws in Trump's foreign policy. It happened to despite him. I mean, they this is how ugly twisted, sick, distorted. The media has become all right joining us to discuss this and much more. Our Senator Tim Scott, our friend from South Carolina. You know, I don't know how I like better. I'd like Lindsey Graham. He's really been doing a pretty good job. But I'm gonna I think I like you better. You have great taste in your guests. Lindsey Graham's an excellent choice. I won't argue with you, Barry, both of are you both great? Yes, we could. We cannot be more proud of the President of the United States than his military action. He took a high risk and it earned a high return. And the media has gone bonkers. If you cannot credit President Trump for bringing down the highest profile the leader of the ISIS movement back Daddy, there is something wrong with your process. They can't overcook my grits. To see the response from the left in the media, which perhaps the same the exact same thing at times, this is just outrageous. The lack of a positive response. I don't understand it. John. You know, you said something really funny. You kind of reminded me you remember the movie my cousin Minnie. You said overcook my brits. You know, remember the how do you like it al Dente? And uh do you like it oldente? You like instant grits? No good Southern or whatever, use instant grits. Oh, and then he tears apart. Anyway, you reminded me of that, you know, Yeah, you've got now and I know you were one of the early signatories, if you will on this Lindsey Graham effort to say impeachment's debt on arrival because it's being done and behind closed doors, led by a fact witness, a compromised congressman to corrupt, frankly coward and congenital liar Adam Shippy lied to us three years about Russia. So now they're going to vote to have the inquiry after we already have all the facts. What else do we need besides the transcript? Is there anything you can think of? I can't. I'll tell you what. There's a stinch coming from the House of Representatives because of the fact that they've cooked the books before they allow any of the process to go public. One of the reasons why I have said very clearly that the presumption of innocence have to apply to this situation. It's because they've made this into a judicial process that we know that the impeachment process is a political one. But the way that they have characterized it and framed it, my good friend Trey Gaudy could not have said it better that the impeachment process is the closest thing to a death row case or a politician. I've read the transcript several times, and the President of the United States is not guilty, according to the transcript and my interpretation of an impeachable offense. The process, of course matters, but we should first start with the fact that there's nothing for us to take a look at. If you've read the transcript, it's not only that the president is not guilty of anything. And what they said, the quid pro quo. You know, they've now changed their stories now a million times, and they keep raising and moving bars all over the place about what this impeachment is about. But it was supposed to be about the phone call and a quid pro quo. There is no quid pro quo. Here's what I hear, and I've read the transcript on the air, both radio and TV. Often I hear the press saying, and we know we know Ukraine because we have a court decision in Ukraine that said they interfered in our twenty sixteen election. We went through three years of oh, we can't have foreign interference in our election. So what I hear the President is saying is, hey, I need a favor. Can you help us get to the bottom of this. To me, he's faithfully executing the laws of the land, something the media mob said they cared about, Democrats said they cared about for three years. Sehn, your point is crystal clear that president of the United States is looking back at twenty sixteen, not looking forward at an opponent. That is something that we have to We have to bifurcate this conversation. We have to make a line of delineation that simply says the president is looking at previous corruption in the election process, not looking for a way to injure or bring into conversation. Frankly, Joe Biden for the future, it was about what happened in he's sixteen. He is like a hounddog on this situation. He wants to bring forth to declare public what happened in twenty sixteen, and that's what he was pursuing and in my opinion, reading that transcript, like I said ten times, it is clear he is looking back and not forward, and that to me is doing the job of the president of the United States. Let me ask you about Biden, because it does come up. Okay, So if you're looking for a quid pro quote, tell me, Senator if I'm wrong. When Joe Biden's on tape bragging that he leveraged a billion taxpayer dollars and said, I'm you got six hours, you fire the sky, You're not getting the money, well, it sounds to me like a quid pro quo because and then he says, son of a bee, they fired him. And then we now learn and we had the disaster interview of my view of Hunter Biden. Do you have any experience in Ukraine? No? Have any experience and energy oil gas? No? Why do you think they picked you to give millions of dollars to I don't know. Did they think it might have anything to do with the fact that your dad was the vice president? Probably? Now, how do the Democrats just say that's a conspiracy theory when we know those are all facts. Well, number one, it is impossible to not hear what you just said and not hear the sound of the swamp needing to be drained. That's the first thing that comes to mind. Number Two, it is undeniable that Vice President Joe Biden made it crystal clear that in order to get the money you had to do something that to me sounds like quinn pro quo. And number three, if your dad's running for president, you might not want to go on TV. I think you're going to incriminate everything that has happened along the way. That's what Hunter Biden did from my perspective. Now, the fact of the matter is if you fixed they changed the names and it was Vice President Trump and Donald JR. Oh, I think the reaction. I think the reaction would be very different. All right, let me ask you this question, where is this going? Because to me, the Democrats are so often that they they're out of their minds with rage in the psychosis against Trump. Um they can they ever they jumped out of the airplane. Are they now going to impeach them? Impeach the president? In your view, if they do, what will happen in the Senate? DA There's no question that this behind the scenes public not invited. Republicans, you have no access to the information, to the testimony, to the witnesses, to the fact patterns. Mister President, police sit on your hands because you and your team and your legal response will have nothing to respond to because we're sending you nothing over. There's no way a person of conscious sitting as a juror can look at this process and say, I find him only in this because you can't find them guilty, because there's no doubt the process has been so corrupted, so indefensible, that there's only one thing that a person of good conscience can conclude, and that is that the guilty party might be in the House, but it's signed in the White House. The interesting thing, and I found fascinating in Washington Times today prints out you know this full Department of Justice. The Department of Justice investigated and their criminal division has now completed their investigation into the conversation with President Trump and the Ukrainian president, even about Joe Biden. They concluded that mister Trump did not violate any campaign finance laws, and a separate division of the department also ruled the administration did not break the law by failing to quickly share a whistleblower's complaint with Congress saying the matter didn't meet the definition of urgent that would trigger the law. The Department also released the transcript of the President's conversation with President Zelenski, showing that the American leader did talk about mister Biden and his son, but mister Trump did not threaten to withhold military aid as some of alleged. When you hear now that we know what Biden did and shaking down Ukraine with taxpayer money, when his VP now that we know his son got all of that money for doing nothing with no experience, do you is there any criminal statute that you can think of? I mean, beyond the ethics stink of it all, Is there anything you can see that would be legally that would put them in any legal jeopardy. I think it's very important for us to note that Attorney General Bill Barr is a man that we can trust and have confidence in, and we can also have great confidence that this is just the beginning and not the end. The fact that he's looking into the twenty sixteen election process will include all that we've talked about so far, and as important as it is that he is looking in to the entire higher process and the im probing at all. I think President Zelinsky's convents of their not being a quid pro quo is incredibly important to what we get from hearsayers, because you can't call him whistleblowers hearsayers when both parties on the conversation says that there was no quid pro quo, We're going to go to someone who was not on the conversation to establish a fact pattern that is non existent. And then you have shift making up from whole cloth a transcript that cannot, does not, and will exist. Remember he lied for three years, he lied about Russia for three years. Well, you know, so there's nothing in the real transcripts, so let me make it up as I go exactly so there's no way that we can have any confidence in what's happening in the house. All right, Senator Tim Scott, friend of the program. Love having you on from South Carolina. Thank you, Senator, You're always welcome. And maybe we'll get you and Lindsay on together. We'll have a maybe we'll even bring Gaudy to the mix. That'll be fun. A yeah, a powl metal wind day. I love it sounds great, all right, Senator, thank you. Eight hundred ninety four one. Sean, you want to be a part of the program on News Round Up, Information Overload. I'm finding it a more interesting. Hoyer now throwing cold water on Pelosi's impeachment plan. I think he's begin in a sense what I've been saying. This is a disaster for them. We'll continue coming up next our final News round Up and Information Overload hour. The President United States went on talking about how Baghdad he died like a quote dog, a coward, a whimpering, whimpering and sniveling. He sounded not like a president of the United States. He actually sounded like Saddam Hussang. After towards ring people sounded like momark adopt Republicans and Democrats are united in their applause for the news that a military operation in Syria took down the number one most wanted terrorists in the world, ISIS leader Abu Bakr el Baghdatti. Here's the press conference from yesterday. Take a look. Last night, the United States brought the world's number one terrorist leader to justice. Baboo Bakar al Baghdatti is dead. He was the founder and leader of ISIS, the most ruthless and violent terror organization anywhere in the world. He died after running into a dead end tunnel, whimpering and crying and screaming all the way. So can we at least agree that the world is a better place without this guy in it? Oh? Trump will the Baghdatti, which one of you bet? But Dotty's a bad guy. I'm glad he's dead. Trump is now taking credit for all of this. And I remember when when Osama bin lay Wet we got away up that he put up was captured. Yeah, he said, you know, Obama should not be taking credit for this because the Navy seals did it well. In this case, the special ops or whoever they were did this thing also, So maybe she should back off a little bit and stop bragging about it so much. All right, They're the insanity of everybody in the media, everybody in you know, on the left and TV, the medium mob, the Democratic mob. They can't even find it within themselves to praise the president. Good job, mister president. How about you just say that now? Bad enough? You know you have the Washington Post leading the way. The Austere religious scholar dies at forty forty eight. Really, Oh, and you can't say he is a coward either and then and then they can't say it word or it's just it's such a derangement we got in Hollywood now sympathy growing for Baghdatti, the terrorist, the murderer who used to behead Americans. On live TV, live streaming it. You had Jamie Lee Curtis racking up thousands of replies before she had to delete a tweet actually suggesting the Islamic state leader at Bu Bakar al Baghdaddy suffered when he was killed Sunday during a US military operation. President Trump mince no words, describing the death of Baghdaddy at the hands of our brave men and women as a brutal killer who has caused so much hardship and death has violently been eliminated. He died like a dog. He died like a coward. Then Jamie Lee Curtis reacted to the President's speech and tweets out, well, he may have died a coward at real, Donald Trump, but all living things suffer when they're blown up. What is wrong with these people? There's like a missing chip, There's something like this is like a mass psychosis. I mean, to be at liberal, you have to now deny that objective truth exists. You have to live in such a state of hypocrisy that you know Russian interference only matters if it's Trump, not the dirty dossier. That obstruction can only be Donald Trump, but not Hillary's deletion, bleach bit namorous. That election interference from foreign countries matters, but not if it's Ukraine helping Hillary. All the eye believers nowhere to be found when it's the Lieutenant governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia. It is that sick, It is that inconsistent, that hypocritical, that psychotic. At this point, you have to suspend any intellectual honesty, reason, common sense to live in this insane world that now the mob and the media and liberal Democrats live in. And this impeachment madness doesn't matter the Justice Department. We've all read the transcript. Everyone's heart about the transcript. The President in the transcript is trying to do his job and faithfully execute the laws of the land and saying, if you have information about twenty sixteen election interference, we have an agreement. By the way, put that aside, would you we'd like you to help us. Democrats once cared about that for three long years, when They thought they could get Trump on that, but apparently not. Now, Okay, the bidens. You want to talk about quid pro quos, We got a quid pro quo. You got six hours, six hours, and I'm gonna you're not getting the money. Fire this prosecutor. Okay, son of him be they fired him? Why did they fire Why did he want him fired? Because his son's being paid millions? And the dopey sun goes on Good Morning America. Did you have any background with Ukraine? No energy, no oil, no gas. No? Oh well, why do you think they hired you? I don't know. Could it be your last name? The fact that your dad's the second most powerful guy in the country. Yeah, oh, if that was Vice President Trump and Don Junior, you think the mob would act this way? That's a quid pro quo. It's also buying influence in favor. How does the vice president suff What do you think they're giving him all that money for all these countries now we're finding out China everything because they wanted favor. You don't have experience. No other Americans getting millions of dollars, are they anyway? News round Up Information Overload, Kayleegu Mcinaney National Press Secretary Trump twenty twenty, the author of the number one bestseller Swamp Wars, Donald Trump and the New American Populism versus the old Order. I say that they're probably now in a position, although Stunny Horriers trying to wake some of these idiots up. And I heard Stunny Horrier today, Jeff say, you know, signaling that he will not commit to the how was voting this week to formalize their secret Soviet style impeachment inquiry coup attempt after Pelosi said a vote is expected on Thursday. We're gonna have to consider whether or not it's ready to go on Thursday. Do you think that there is conflict within the Democratic ranks on this, Yes? Absolutely. And let's remember that Senny Hoyer has clashed in the past with Nancy Pelosi. He's let's just say, a minimal fan of hers, So there has historically been friction there between the two of them, and I can see it coming out right here with his comments on impeachment. I mean, whatever else you want to say about Senny Hoyer, he's a pretty sharp politician. He understands the pickle they've gotten themselves into, and I think he wants to be very cautious. What do you think, Kaylee mcinanny, Yeah, I think rightfully so. I mean, this is essentially an admission that what they've been doing all along was not the right way. It's also an attempt to legitimize a coup. This is a sham vote. I think Stenny Hoyer in part realizes that, or at least I hope, because essentially what you're staying with this vote is, Yeah, we know we've raided your house. We know we've violated your right to be free from a lawful search and sidure. We know that we've taken away your Fourth Amendment rights. But here's a warrant thirty four days later, and this should make up for it. Well, that just doesn't work. To try to on the back end say yes, let's give the president the rights he deserves. When you've done this under the shroud of darkness, the Q and A is in a skiff, under lock and key, and you've selectively leaked, it looks really bad to the American people. And I think wiser Democrats, if there are any, at least realize that. I don't know. It seems like most of them jumped out of the airplane and they're five thousand feet below where the plane is now. I don't know if they have any ability to climb back up and get an airplane. I would think that the thirty to forty or so Democrats that are in Trump won districts in twenty sixteen, that they've got to be pretty nervous and they may know they're walking the plank if they go along with this madness. But there's no indication that they have any say now. When they had their last meeting, apparently there were twenty seven of them, at least, maybe as many as thirty two. I heard my sources that were like, this is a bad idea. Does that resistance still exist? I guess we're going to find out. I expect there's going to be a lot of arm twisting of those people and saying you need to do this for the good of the country. Right. Yeah, they are going to be told that, and they are going to be put in a bad situation here. I mean, you know, you look at a state like Pennsylvania where you've got some of these people who were elected. They'll be in real trouble if they do this, real trouble and they know it. They know it so you know, pushing these people into doing this when it's you know, more or less signing your own political death warrant is something they're not going to appreciate. Yeah, in terms of the mob and the media, they're the biggest donors to the Democratic Party. We know our friends at Media Research, and you know they do a pretty good job. And what they've pointed out is the broadcast networks, well, they have despite all the unreliable nature of these anonymous sources, the three broadcast networks, I'll throw this to Kayley, they have used them in nearly three fifths of their news reports about quote, the impeachment probe since it began, and the day the impeachment inquiry was announced, these three broadcasts devoted three hundred and twenty two minutes to the probe of their evening newscasts across one hundred and forty separate news segments. So the bottom line is that's about eighty two or fifty seven percent relied at least in part on anonymous sourced information. We don't need any sources at this point, do we Careley, Because we got the transcript exactly. We don't need any source because we have the first stand information. But that's what the media does. They don't care the veracity of the source, the truthfulness of the information. They just care if it's damaging to President Trump. It's damaging to President Trump by all means, they'll publish it. They'll run with it if it's an anonymous source, or I agree with the President at times, perhaps even baking up sources and saying it's an anonymous source. But we have You're exactly right, Sean, we have the transcript before our very eyes. We see there's no quid pro quo. So that's why these selective leaks from the testimony from this Vendelman guy, and from Bill Taylor and all the selective leaks, these are just opinions on a transcript we all have seen because we have it in front of us. We have the information. We don't need the opinions from second, third hand sources, many of whom like Vendelmann today who's never even associated with the president or had interaction with the president, and just read the transcript like the rest of America. So Mark Halperin, who I guess a regular panelst on liberal Joe and he and the other guy, the other idiot, Heilman I guess his name is or responsible for game change. They took what could have been a great show called the Circus, and they turned it into an abusively biased hate Trump circus. Just an extension of everything else we see in the mob in the media. But anyway, he writes a book. In this book, he is saying that there is a plot with the Democrats and never trumpers to doom Trump's twenty twenty election. The Washington Examiner has this in there today and that it's called the Moonshot Project, which would begin next spring, would have the goal of pulling at least three points away from Trump's reelection, enough to rob him of reelection in a close election. And given the broad support the president has from the GOP candidates, their allies would have to be prepared to take tremendous heat. But if the election is as close as expected, quote, a talented, committed challenger could pull enough votes in a battleground state to make it impossible for Trump to win, especially if the Democrats manage the Green Party. And then he throws out names like Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker, Tom Ridge, former Pennsylvania governor, Tommy Thompson, former Wisconsin Governor David Jolly of Florida. Do you think they would do that, Jeff Lord, Oh, I think they try. I think they try. But you know, most of the people involved with these kind of things, I have never had any serious on the ground experience in politics. Some of them, yes, but not a lot of them. And so they're off there in this Trump derangement syndrome, cloud cuckoo land, sitting there and plotting in Washington, DC or wherever, and they think they can pull this off. On the other hand, when I get out there, I was out twice last week to different events Here in Pennsylvania, people are really ginned up. I mean they are not just enthusiastic about the presidents. They're going to do absolutely everything things they can pull out all the stops because they're aware that these kinds of people are out there and they have had enough of it. Yeah, I think Democrats will pursue this in the House. I think that they are delusional enough to think that this is a good idea. I think they get to vote despite the fact that members like Congress from Peterson, who won in a district that Trump won by thirty points, will then lose his seat. So yeah, I think they impeach in the House. I think it is completely stopped in the Senate, and I think we win back the House along with President Trump winning re election on November third, twenty twenty. Jeff Floord, where are you going with us? Yeah? Yeah, I think they're going to try it. Absolutely. And the fact over in the Senate that Lindsey Graham has already got fifty Republican Senators criticizing the House for this action. I mean, this is dead on arrival, as the old Leon Panetta phrase used to be about Reagan budgets. It's dead and arrival over there. It isn't going to go anywhere, and it's going to turn around. The President certainly will turn it around and make it an asset for himself. Believable times we live in. I'll tell you that this I don't know if I've ever seen such madness in my life. This is like group psychosis. And by the way, if they win, then they want to destroy the country with the New Green Deal and Medicare for All and every other dumb idea they have. Jeff Lord, Kaylee mcinanny, thank you eight hundred and nine for one. Shawn Tolfree telephone number. We have an awesome Hannity tonight at nine tell you more about that. But when we come back, your calls are coming up next. All right, twenty five till the top of the hour, eight hundred and nine, four one, Shawn, if you want to be a part of the program. We've not spoken I don't even think. I think we just mentioned it one day in passing. We've been so busy with everything else that's been in the news. But this California Congresswoman Katie Hill, and she gives this four minute I guess resignation with a lot of ups and downs in it. From what I could see of it. She is claiming she is a victim of revenge porn in a pretty defiant video shared online. Freshman democrat kind of fiery at times, other times somewhat tearful YouTube speech in front of an American flag, saying she's resigning from office because of an abusive husband and a coordinated campaign carried out by the right wing media. Now, look, I'm too busy working to follow the right wing media, Linda. We haven't talked about it. What we might have mentioned it, I think once in passing, correct, Yeah, I mean we were just basically trying to figure out what her deal was. Yeah, well, I think what I said is all I know is if this was a Republican it would be everywhere, it would be never. And I'll tell you our girlfriend, Kerry Pickett, she has been trying to get to the bottom of it and find out, you know, what has been going on. And I think the thing is is that she's got to play the victim because the people that she was having these quote unquote meetings with and paying them for their time, you know, they were paid for consulting, they got a bonus, you know, and it's all on the taxpayer dollars. So it's a problem. Well, you know, one of the things I've been saying, I know a lot of these guys have had these settlements where, you know, we've had reports and we've talked about it at length, that taxpayer dollars have been used to make settlements with staff by congressmen in congresswomen. Now, I don't you know, sometimes that becomes a he said, she said, Sometimes it becomes a business decision that you you know, Okay, it's gonna cost me this amount of money if you pay somebody, it's gonna cost me this amount of money if if I litigate it, and it's gonna be horrible press. So you never know. But the thing is, if they want to make these settlements, I've been saying, due with your own money. That's that's let's see, that's the thing like she's saying, you know, oh, my husband did this to me. At the end of the day, you know, what you do in the privacy of your own home or your office or whatever you're doing. Okay, fine, I don't want to know about it. Well, when you start, you know, having affairs with people that are your junior, you know, they report to you, you know, and it gets a little Harry. I mean, this is why we all have HR and you know we kind of have to go through all of these you know, these various thirty hour you know, um human resources training sessions. You know, forgive me, thank you, Jason. So you know there's let me tell you at Fox, there's like New York state law, then there's the HR Department laws, and then there's this law, and then there's that law. I mean, it's all over the place, no for sure. But the problem is that her story it just kept getting worse. First it was like, oh, I you know, I was fooling around with this girl. She was an intern. Then she came on as a staffa. Oh, then it wasn't just me, it was me Safa. Then it was me her and my husband. We were in a couple. We were a throuble. You know, I didn't even know what a throuble was to I never heard of that, or were the only two Ethan Jason, no idea, Katie never heard of thule Kylie. If you guys ever, did anyone ever hear of that before? Who did? No one? Did? No one? Did no one? I mean, I mean Katie Hill obviously knew all about it because she was in it, but other than that, nobody knew what it was. And I think, you know, so then it's like, Okay, now I got Thrupple, uh you know it was all consensual. Now I got this other guy, you know, and this guy I don't even want I don't even want to hear it. I just don't want you got to hear it because I'm telling you about it. Well, then this other guy, she swim around with this guy, you know, I mean, is this a hot mess? You know? And that the problem is, what is the revenge porn part of it. What does she mean by that because her well, the affair she was having, obviously it wasn't enough just to have the affair. They needed to, you know, commemorate it with a photo or a video. You know, it's like, okay, you know, not only oh so she so. In other words, she's saying one of the people in wild saying her ex husband released these photos on various websites to get back at her, and that's why it's a revenge porn type situation. Well, it sounds like her husband's a jerk if he was participating in all of this where he was mad because his wife was having multiple fans with men and women. Yeah, well so you know, you know there might be some rational, righteous indignation. I'm just saying, people do crazy things, you know when they get you know, they get hurt. Where is she coming up with a coordinated campaign carried out by the right wing media, because that's what gets everybody on her side. See, her side is the victim side. So her side is where everybody's a victim. You know, if you're not a victim, you know there's something wrong with you. So now she's got to say oh no, this was all consensual. I'm a victim. You know. It's because I'm a lesbian. No, no, it's because I'm bisexual. No, it's because my husband abused me. No. I never had an afair with anybody else. Oh no, wait, I wasn't a throuble with my husband. No, no, no, I was having an afair with this other guy. Oh no, I did pay him a bout. I mean, it's a high, it's a disaster. Just go away, be quiet. You're making it worse. You're you're giving me a headache. I have a headache. You're welcome, you know. Anyway. MSNBC the you know area of fifty one Robswell Rachel Madau channel is mourning the tragedy of all of this. U there's a Fordam professor Christina Greer is her name, saying about the resignation. It's a form of technological domestic abuse. You know, I will say this, and in her defense, and people might be surprised. I'm saying this if she and her husband or the thruble, if they make an agreement between themselves to tape something like this and then it's weaponized by one of the three, or I mean at that point, doesn't it now border or you begin to have to investigate the issue me something Storeship just going to cut you off at the past now because you don't know nothing about this, because you're just older and you don't get it. This is the way it works, all right. Once you do something like this, what is wrong with you? Why are you so hostile today? I just need to see. I'm saying that if you participated in this and then you turn around and you use it against the people involved in this, it's a pretty crappy thing to do, especially if you know it's gonna hurt one of the people that you were involved in and you all decided to do this, and on the other side of it, you can make an argument. And I would go to the Gawker case with Whole Cogan as an example where hang on a second. This he got one hundred and forty million dollars in a jury verdict and Gawker went under as a result. That was that was a landmark case. Go ahead, So in the age of twenty nineteen, almost twenty twenty, for anybody to take a picture, for anybody to have a video, and you're gonna say to the other person. Now listen, just keep it for yourself, never show it to anybody. First of all, you are a mo run. Okay, because there is no way run. No run is an extended, amplified version of a morun. Okay, it's a mo run. You're still done. It has reverb behind it. Get about it. It's a hot mess. So now you're gonna take a picture butt naked having an affair, three or four people involved. You're paying people off, and you say, now now that we have all of none of us are honest. We're all doing something wrong. But hey, you have my word. I'm never gonna show anybody this picture. But even though I'm cheating on my wife, my husband, they've been money from the taxpag They may not think it's wrong. They have a different value system than you do. All right, so they got a different value system. But they're never going to show the naked pictures. Give me a break. Why don't you take a picture on an iPhone? Forget about it. It's for the world to see. That's why they have a thing called the cloud that keeps getting hacked. How many actors and actresses have we seen button naked? Because they can't stop taking pictures of themselves naked and then it makes careers. I mean didn't depends Baris Hilton, they all have I don't know. I don't ever watch that crap, so it's not up for me. All right, let me get to the phones. Uh Moses knew joy Zy? What's up? Moses? How are you welcome to the program? I'm doing outstanding? Sean, Thank you so much for taking my call. And I actually saw you a Politicon this weekend. I was actually down there and I thought the debate was awesome and have fun, yes, sir, you know. And the one takeaway that I have, Sean, and this is one thing that really really like resonated with me, is that, you know, like some of the some of the debates that I saw with some of the Democrats and some people on the left, the way that they debate what they're saying, it's just they are living in a completely different world. And my takeaway is this, and this is how I think the Begins and Conservatives can actually win the messaging war that they're losing right now, because it's easy to say, to assent to a Republican senator or maybe a conservative talk show host that you're a racist, you're a Nazi that walls don't work, you know, pick their poison. But it's not so easy to have that same argument, and for example, Poonacy Pelosi on camera and say that walls don't work to the Border Patrol sector chief of the San Diego sector. You can't do that because she will wreck her. With the stats, with the data, how assaults on agents go down eighty percent. We have to turn that White House press briefing room into a debate stage. Have the best spokespeople alongside with the President make the case to the American people and give us a security briefing, one that the press will not be able to deny and also the Democrats will not be able to oppose. We need to elevate the people that are around the president, the lifelong officials that are that he supports, and have them make the case a live televised presidential town hall. Imagine you as the moderator with the Angel moms, with the Ice officials, with the Border Patrol agents jumping into that river, saving the families, with the charts, the data, everything showing the American people what's happening and disproving every single Democratic talking point and every single mainstream media lie, that will be very, very it'll be awesome for the American people. Look, I am as a conservative and thank you for the call. Confident that when you put the president's record. Look, Reagan ran on, are you better off than you are four years ago? The answers obviously yes, Obama and Biden ran on, Oh, Osama's dead and GM's alive. Okay, bag Daddy's dead. And we have the lowest unemployment numbers since nineteen sixty nine, record low unemployment for African Americans, Hispanic Americans, Asian Americans, women in the workplace. All right, Next question, do you think that Donald Trump has lost any of the support of people that went out and passionately voted for him in twenty sixteen. I don't think he's lost day. Can he get maybe of the seven million Americans off of food stamps and the seven million new jobs who created, Can he get some of those voters to say this is working for me and vote for him? I think yeah. I like his chances, and I don't think Impeachman is going to have any impact at all. Back to our phones, Terry is in California. This fire is so out of control it's so scary. What is happening out in California? Now we got now new wins of coming in as I understand it. Terry, you're a firefighter, God bless you. That is a very difficult, dangerous job. Sir, Yes, sure, glad to be with you. So the reason I called is I just want to give you an update. It's really not the news is not really doing it. Just as to what had happened up here, the initial fires started to believe on Wednesday, burned down and threatened the town of Geyserville, which is about twenty miles north of Santa Rosa, which had about ten percent of the homes burned down on the Tubs fire in twenty seventeen. My wife is a sergeant in Santa rose A Police department, and brothers the time chief with the Santa Rosa So the information I've got from them, myself being retired now after twenty six years in a student of the wildfire history, this thing had set up between Wednesday when the winds kind of turned off, burned Thursday and Friday and burned down, So it was kind of pointing directly at the town of Windsor Larkfield in Santa Rosa, So we got very lucky. And I have to say the strategy and tactics of this instandent management team and Colt Fire and the cooperating agencies have put together was absolutely amazing, some of the best firefighting in recorded history. So they had enough time to get about five hundred and fifty engines up, which is one hundred and ten strike teams, dozers, water tenders, aircraft, had everything in place, and then the major wind event hit. We had one hundred and three o'clock mile per hour winds at the ridge top and fifty to eighty down in the flats. So they took probably about I'm guessing about one hundred and fifty to two hundred engines and staggered them at least two miles deep from where the firefront was to where it was potentially going to jump the highway, which is six lanes. So they were literally my brother said that they were literally bumper to bumper engines on every street, every firefighter putting out every ember that they could possibly find, and managed to keep it from jumping the freeway, which was absolutely one of the biggest success stories in wildfire modern wildfire history. I've never we've never had a chance to get everything right. They evacuated out one hundred and ninety thousand people hours eight hours in advance, so everybody was out of the way, which allowed the firefighters to really get in there and do their jobs. I mean, from what I saw, these guys took a hell of beating the police department, law enforcement or military or up there keeping everything safe locked down. But if this fire had jumped the one on one, in my estimation, it was going to burn all the way to the Pacific Ocean, which is about thirty five miles and that was the entire evacuation area in that area, looking about two hundred and fifty thousand acres that would have burned. So right now, the winds are picking up again to about thirty five miles per hour affecting GUS to sixty this afternoon in this evening. So currently the big threats are to Middletown in Calistoga, which is on the eastern flank of the fire, in the south end of the fire. So keeping fingers crossed that they can keep doing some great work. And again I just I want to say that the fire in law enforcement is this has to be the absolute biggest fire success story I've ever heard of. Wow, you just stunned all of us. We're all looking at each other like, Wow, you really are a student of these wildfires. I don't have a lot of time to go into detail. I just want to say this, Thank goodness, thank God there are people like you and all these firefighters. It scares me watching all of this happen out there, the destruction, the devastation, the people's homes. It's horrible when people lose homes' But you know, more importantly, you're saving lives and you are saving property, and it is a great personal risk. And I just want you to know we're thinking about all of you guys out there fighting every day. You're in our thoughts and prayers, and thank you for what you do and the heroism your show every day. And our prayers are with you and everybody out there. All right, quick break, we'll continue now. Listen, we're wrapping things up for today, but I will tell you I have Hanniday tonight, nine Eastern on the Fox News Channel. Loaded up. We got Devin Newness, we got Steve Scalise, we got Senator Lindsey Graham, Dan Bongino, Uraldo on the political side. How will all this democratic madness play out? Carl Rove Ranks previous That's Hannaday tonight sat you DVR nine Eastern on the Fox News Channel. And we will be back here tomorrow as always, thank you for being with us, See you tonight, Back here tomorrow

The Sean Hannity Show

Sean Hannity is a multimedia superstar, spending four hours a day every day reaching out to millions 
Social links
Follow podcast
Recent clips
Browse 4,481 clip(s)