Where coming to your city, saying you'll concie, will all be desire jailer and if you want a little banging y yang, come along. Good. Biden administration is trying to do hard things. That's the business of governing. They are on a very big losing streak. George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, all of them with tears in their eyes for the departure from our democracy that is happening right now today. We must not be complacent or complicit. Freedom is back in style. Welcome to the revolution where I'm coming to your city. Don't want to play our get new Sean Hannity Show behind the scenes, information on breaking news and more bold inspired solutions for America. This is a special edition of the Sean Hannity Show America Trap Behind Enemy Lines, Day number one fifty seven, our two Sean Hannity Show. We'll get to your calls at the bottom of this half hour eight hundred nine for one Shawn, if you want to be a part of the program. I read this article in the Daily Wire where I saw it first. It has to do. The headline is Judge orders FDA to expedite the release of FAISA data on COVID nineteen vaccine of paramount public importance. Now, this stems from a federal judge in Texas ordering the FDA to expedite the release of what is hundreds of thousands of pages of nand documents on the FISA vaccine, rejecting any request by the federal government to give out the data over seventy five year period. Why why it's relevant to now? I mean, that's all you hear, one size fits all vaccine, vaccine, vaccine. We run out of therapeutics and tests, and we don't talk about anti virals or monoclone alant of bodies. But anyway, the judge in this case, Judge Mark Pittman, US District Court for the Northern Districts of Texas, ruling that the FDA has got to release all of the data by FISA for its application for their vaccines Emergency Authorization use at a pace of fifty five thousand pages a month. The FDA had requested that it be allowed to put out the data at a far slower pace of five hundred pages per month. Now, this ruling comes as a result of four Your Request Freedom of Information Act request filed by the Public Health and Medical professionals. The transparency it's a group form to make public the data used by the FDA to grant emergency approvals for in a case of COVID COVID nineteen vaccines. The attorney's name is Aaron Sirie. He represented a group in the court over the four year request, and he said this is a great win for transparency. Removes one of the strangleholds that federal health authorities have had on data needed for independent scientists to offer solutions and address serious issues with current vaccine programs, issues which include waiting immunity, variants, evading vaccine immunity, and as the CDC is confirmed, the vaccines do not prevent transmission. Now, let me take you back in time, because we have played this many times. Remember when they were first pushing the vaccine. You know what were they saying. They were saying, if you get vaccinated, you're not going to get COVID. You can make an argument, oh okay, well, we didn't anticipate that this variant or that variant that is irrelevant. This is what they said. The ruling states that the FDAY has got to turn over twelve thousand pages by the end of this month. Fifty five thousand pages every thirty days until the entirety and omitted redacted portions of the data are submitted by FISA has been released. The person in charge of this case, Aaron Siries, a managing partner of Sirie and Glimstad, had a huge victory with this verdict. He joins us, Now, how are you, sir? I think it is an important victory as well. I'm curious why did they want to roll this out over the course of seventy five years. Why would it be relevant seventy five years from now? It wouldn't be. If the average life expectancy of most Americans is seventy seven years, waiting seventy five years would mean everybody alive today pretty much would be dead before the documents were fully released, and until the documents the data are fully released. As the scientists that comprised the group I represented explained numerous times, they can't do a proper analysis because if even one data set is missing, they don't know if an analysis they've done is incorrect. So waiting seventy five years would effectively mean that the FDA's review of these documents, a review that we the taxpayers paid for um, could not have been a sess, could not have gotten a let's call it a second opinion. You know, pure expect or anticipate that there's going to be an appeal from the f DAY. UM. There's been no signal yet, and my expectation is that they won't appeal. Actually, UM, I think that if the f DAY didn't realize how bad it looked that they wanted to wait that long to release this data, I think there they should realize it now, especially given the judge's decision, which I think made clear how important this data is and that it should be released forthwith. I don't think they're going to get a better outcome in the Fifth Circuit if they do decide to appeal it. But if they choose to do so, you know, we certainly will be arguing that it should be done even quickly. That that would be a good argument. Now, I've interviewed doctors, some I agree with, some I disagree with, and but I'm trying. I tell my audience to you've got to educate yourself. Read as much as you can do your own research. You take into account your medical history, your current medical condition, talk to your doctor. Doctors, the medical professionals you most trust, and then that decision has to come from you. I don't believe in one size fits all medicine either, and I've interviewed people with rare conditions they can't get the vaccine. But we know where the government stands on all of this. And what's fascinating to me in this whole process is there have been people out of call it to those radio show yesterday that do have adverse reactions to the vaccine. Now over whelmingly they will tell you that the vaccine prevent you from being hospitalized or dying. But that's a very different bar and a very different thing from what they were telling us in the beginning. This is what they were saying in the beginning for making sure healthcare workers are vaccinated, because if you seek care and a healthcare facility, you should have a certainty that the people providing that care are protected from COVID and cannot spread it to you. The various shots that people are getting now cover that there. You're okay, you're not going to You're not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations. Vaccines prevent getting infected, prevent getting sick, prevent your hospitalization, our data from the CDCs today suggests you know that that vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick, and that it's not just in the clinical trials, but it's also in real world data. Now we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated person. A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus, the virus does not infect them. The virus cannot then use that person to go anywhere else. All right, So you've got Joe Biden and all these other people saying over and over again, doctor Fauci, if you get vaccinated, you're not going to get COVID? What happened to that? Because now if you've vaccinated, boostered and even of natural immunity, people are getting COVID. Yes they are. And that's precisely why we want all hands on deck, so to speak. We need independent scientists reviewing all of this status so they can help address these issues on the point of address reaction. If it might be helpful me to point out that at my firm, we've got eighteen professionals that all we've been doing. All they do is vaccine related, working a number of them. All they do is vaccine injury cases in the Federal Court of Claims. If you're injured by vaccine, you have to sue the federal government. You can't see the pharmaceutical companies US for all vaccines pretty much because of the law path in nineteen eighty six by Congress. But when it comes to COVID vaccines, you can't even bring a claim in that specialized program where you're suing federal health authorities for injuries because of something called a Presact. If you are injured by a COVID vaccine, there is pretty much no recourse. There's a program called the CICP that's I'm not aware of any attorney. Pharmaceutical companies are protected and you can sue the federal government, but you're not going to get far suing the federal government. Correct. When it comes to all vaccines other than COVID vaccine, yes, you could sue the federal government. You sue actually the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, that is who has respondent if you're injured by those vaccines, and we've been handling those claims well before COVID. That program is paid out over four billion dollars for injuries from other vaccines, but when it comes to COVID vaccine, you can't even bring a claim in that otherwise already very limited program that has statutory caps, where the Department of Justice that's defending against any claim of injury. It's the only consumer product like that. Usually the federal government is protecting consumers from big corporations that might harm them. When it comes to vaccines, that's the only industry I'm aware where the federal government defends the company from any claim by consumers for injury. But going back to COVID vaccine, you can't even go into that program. The pharmaceutical companies have complete immunity visor MADERNA and JJ, so if they're so safe, one has to query why did they need this level of immunity. I also tell you that my phones, you know, my firms phones, email submissions, you know, since the COVID vaccine of release, we've never gotten this level, this torrent of people emailing calling with you know, seeking assistance with regards to COVID vaccines injuries. And I will tell you these are not folks that have issues of vaccines. They're not folks that have us some concerns about vacines. These are folks that one thing got the COVID vaccine. Folks who have concerns about covid vaccine don't call our firm about COVID vaccine injuries because they didn't get the shot. All right, quick break, We'll come back more with Aaron Siri, managing partner of Sirie and Glimstad Siri, who just had a judge rule in his favor in a case against BISA Freedom of Information Act request, and all of the science and information and data will be released in a timely manner. It's not about vaccine hesitancy. It's about adverse reactions that some people have. You know, we hear myocarditis for example, and other things. Spontaneous women that are pregnant spontaneously have a miscarriage. This has all been well published. And what would you say to the people that said, Okay, well, the alternative is no antibodies and that means you die and more millions more would have died. Blah blah blah blah. Now, what I do like about your approach from a different, whole, different point of view is that we've been lectured to follow the science, and you're saying you want other scientists to look at the data and see what they how they interpret it. Right. Look, I would say this in terms of the injuries, just in terms of the types of injuries. For the most part, what we're seeing are calls regarding various neurological neuropathies as well as immune related issues. Now, obviously most not everybody who gets a COVID vaccine ends up up an injury, and not everybody that has COVID ends up getting hurt or dying, right, But there's a percentage in both groups. And I would say that we should care about all people. We should care about people who are who are negatively affected by COVID. COVID does kill pee some people, and it's certainly harms some people, and the vaccine does injure some people, and we should care. And we have room enough not only in our hearts, but also in our system of governments and so forth to take care of everybody. In terms of the approach, I think that what you're saying, Sean makes so much sense. To talk to your doctor, make a personal decision for yourself. Everybody should be able to decide for themselves. But when it comes to mandates, it takes away that choice. By the way, the left wants to quarantine people and like, uh, I don't know and in special interming camps for crying out loud if they choose not to get the vaccine, Utah being the latest. Let me let me ask this question, because I think this is very important. Now. We had on doctor Robert Malone. He since come under tremendous fire. It's interesting because he was the one that created the technology for the m RNA virus, without which we wouldn't have a fizo maderna shot. I'm sorry for the back for the Biza maderna vaccine, the technology, the r r NA vaccine technology. And he's on this program and he said it's not ready for mass use the technology he created. And he said, but with that said, the people that are most at risk sixty five, older, comorbidities, pre existing conditions, compromised immune systems, he would say it would be appropriate for them, But he said them only. And that kind of surprised me from the guy that invented the technology that led to those two very specific vaccines. Look, if a sixty five year old with you know, significant comorbidities doesn't want to take the vaccine, I think that should be their right. And if his twenty year old was completely healthy and is at no risk of COVID wants the vaccine, that should be their right too. This is supposed to be a free country. The problem is, in my opinion, mandates. Going back to what you said again, everybody should be able to choose for themselves. Doctor Malone has his opinion about it. Doctor Fauci has his opinion about it. Medical professionals clearly can disagree about what is best for anyone individual. The one person that shouldn't be making that decision so is the government. It shouldn't be the government telling who should have to get this vaccine to get a job, go to the military, go to school, go to university. That really that's what makes this so problematic and causes the you know, the tension points in our society around around these products and they and they are just products at the end of the day. I'd like to follow up with you, you knows, as this information becomes available to you and as you allow other scientists to look at it, which, by the way, we're following the science here. So I think that's just smart. And maybe there are things that FISA Maderna well in this case as FISA, but maybe the things they missed or maybe things they got right. I'd like to know what you find. So we'll follow this case very closely, and we appreciate you sharing what's going on behind the scenes. I believe in transparency, so this is a big win for people, and I think especially putting something or forcing something into people's bodies, they have every right to know as much as possible about what it is. So thank you for being with us. Absolutely, thank you. And if anybody wants to see those documents and all the data, it's all being made publicly available at the group that we represents website that's PMPT dot org. So everything's available there. And if I may just add one more point, Sean, and it's this you mentioned earlier about you know about interming camps in quarantine and mandates. The CDC director herself has said this vaccine does not stop transmission. If it doesn't stop transmission, and if those are vaccinated, it can also train. Admit it, none of these policies make any sense, even for the very reasons they're staying they need to implement them. Um and you know, should have hope that things have changed dramatically. A fully vaccinated, boostered people, people with natural immunity get it. But I'm just out of time. We'll have you back, Aaron Siri, thank you for being loose. Thank you. All right, quick break, we'll come back. We'll continue, And gentlemen, we'd like to take a second to hear the immortal Bob Grant's thoughts about the world today. Hey, ladies, and Gentlvia is sick. It is getting sicker. Now back to the Seany show really is getting sicker and sicker every single day. I read this news and some days I'm like, oh man, what what what is happening? Watching Share in a panic? The singer Share panicking as mid terms approach. If Democrats lose the House or the Senate, we are ft though it's just the opposite. I don't know what reality she's living in. But if if Republicans lose, we're screwed. I'll put it more gently, all right, Mike and Florida, Mike, you're smart, I'm a dope. You're living in paradise. Where do you live in Florida? And what's the temperature today? Sean, the greatest state in Union. I am in Jacksonville. Temperature right now is fifty five, but it feels like seventies. Beautiful out that's right by the way. When I did play golf, I haven't played in a long time. You've got a great golf course down there with an incredible seventeenth tole uh and you know what I'm talking about? What sawgrass is amazing? Yea driving past it as we speak. So one day I actually played it twice, like the second time I was down there, and I played it me and I know you're not supposed to do this. Me and my friends probably hit six or seven balls each on seventeen. We just kept hitting them. A couple of them went in the water, but we shouldn't have. Probably, I bet you about half the people do that out there, and why not. Yeah, I'm sure, I'm sure they probably do. Nobody nobody yelled at me where it's all good. What's going on? There's more. There's more provy ones in that lake than you could. I wonder if somebody goes in, they've got us in somebody and once a year to probably clean that sucker out, right, I bet just once a week that's probably true. If if you don't know it's saw Grass has a seventeenth are three. I forget how many yards, maybe I'm one sixty five or something like that. Um. And it's an island literally, And when when they play tournaments at Sawgrass, h you know, professional tournaments, on the last day they put the pin in this, they place it in an area where it's so easily will fall all go way past the pin and off the green, depending on where you land on the green, because it's kind of like a two tiered green in the sense that you got a big hill there. As you know. Yes, yes, I'm not playing golf lately, so I forget it. Yeah, it's a great golf course. It's a great area in Florides, a wonderful state. And I was in x New York or thirty forty years ago and done the best move I ever made. But it's good for you, Jacksonville. We're also the home Iran de Santis. And it was intrigued back comment your caller made yesterday about Trump in twenty twenty four and playing that Trump runs and I'm hoping that Ron is a potential VP candidate, although that he said that he likes to be governor. But I'm reading in some sites that Trump doesn't like the Santis, and I'm thinking it's fake news too, because the Santist is a great candidate, just like Trump is. You know, I've been I've been following it on the I know both people pretty well. Um, is there anything to it? I don't know. I mean, I don't know. I'm I just don't know. UM. I agree with you that the Santis has been a great governor and I think he will be reelected this year. I hope so. I mean, it'd be a disaster if he wasn't. I think that they would make a great team. I thought I thought Mike pennsman a great vice president and you know, sadly at the end of the presidency they had this falling out on there's one issue I wish that didn't happen. I prefer some immunity in a little bit. We have enough people out there that hate any conservative and every Republican that you know, the less in fighting and I don't know, battles to go back and forth, the better offer. I think we're going to ultimately be the more where united on the same page, with the same agenda, fighting for the same things, which is the same of the Republic, all hands on deck. I think we're better off. I think DeSantis is a really smart fighter and very a very good tactician. And I think Trump's instincts and guts are exceptional and they're without equal and that's why I think they'd make a good team. I hope it ends up that way. You know, Look, it's it's what we've got twenty twenty two. Um, time is gonna tell um. There's no doubt that I think the President, meaning President Trump, is looking to run again. Otherwise I don't think he would have gone out to Arizona the way he did. The crowd he ad was massive. I've never seen any other pol pelitician attract crowds like he does, and the amount of support that he does, and the agenda worked. We can now in one year of the Biden presidency, we can now compare and contrast the two governing philosophies, and one is an abysmal failure on every level and the other was tremendously successful. And I care about success. Now, some people don't like Donald Trump's style, Okay, fine, but the policies you can't really argue didn't work. They worked should no matter who is president, and if they're a Republican, you said this. If it's Reagan, they found a reason to hate Ronald Reagan, If it was Bush, they found a reason to hate Bush a silver spoon in his mouth, or Reagan was too old. So it doesn't matter who our candidate is, they will find a way to hate them and then try to push that agenda. And you know that certainly. So Trump is just our best fighter, and that's what really kills him and drives them crazy. Listen, nobody's fought like him in my political lifetime, and he's hated for it. And if you want to talk about somebody that was able to expose the underbelly of the swamp, the sewer that is Washington, DC, the stench of corruption, it's him. And I've never met one person in my life that takes up so much space and other people's brains, and Donald Trump, it's hilarious to me. I had something that did you ever postulate or kick this around about how do we change Washington? And the only thing I've ever thought about was how do we decentralize it? So these folks are in Washington twenty four to seven thinking of ways of how to ruin the country, And can we ever make it so that congressman and senators stay in their home states or districts and legislate through secure zoom, just like we've all had to during COVID, where they don't go to Washington and conspire with each other to see how they're going to ruin the country. I'm curious if that ever would get traction as you kick that around, I'm curious if I ever keep these folks. The sad thing is, and this is the danger of New Green dealism is and this was where the phony accounting came into play, is they have they factor in what they call sunset provisions. So Mansion, for example, was saying one hundred and seventy five million. And I actually was Lindsay Graham that insisted the accounting gimmicks that the Democrats and the CBO were using get removed from from the way the CBO scores as a phrase they used scores the bill. And when we got down to okay, if you eliminate the sunset provisions, which are the realistic numbers, because a sunset provision means, oh, we're only we're only going to have pre K education for one year or two years or whatever it is. When we know if that ever passes, we're stuck with it in perpetuity ie Obamacare. So once you take out the accounting gimmicks, that one point seven five trillion became five point one trillion with three trillion in debt that we're putting on our kids and grandkids. So you know what, I like to see a dramatic twenty percent cut across the board, twenty five percent even in government. Absolutely. I think one of Trump's greatest successes that one of the reasons the economy was thriving under his leadership was energy, obviously, independence, netnex border, and number two, getting rid of the bureaucracy that is putting a stranglehold on business and lowering taxes. You know, I'm reading today that California, I mentioned this earlier, they want to double their taxes and have a single payer system in California. That's thirty percent of people's income state income tax, not even talking about local. Then you got property tax on top of it. Then you have your forty percent you're gonna pay Nationally, You're looking at eighty percent of your eighty cents out of every dollar go in a government if Newsom goes forward with that. But I think you'll lose half the population of California if he post tries to pull that off. But anyway, you bring up good points philosophically, I think the country I don't know why I understand it to some extent emotionally. You know, when people here, I don't have to worry about college, I don't have to worry about my retirement. I don't have to worry about my healthcare. The government's going to provide everything for me. It's it's for a piece some people. It's emotionally gratifying and reassuring to people. But the reality is every time it's been tried, every name it's been given, every manifestation it's taken on, it all results in the same thing. More poverty, broken promises, and a loss of freedom. That's that's socialism, statism, authoritarianism, communism, it's all. It's it's one and the same, you know, to varying degrees. Thank you, Mike, was the Pons Craig, North Carolina. Craig, how are you glad you called? Hey? Sean? Thanks taking my call. Um. I just want to talk about something you've mentioned before about school choice. And fundamentally and philosophically I agree with you. But as I learned in grad school and economics with a brilliant professor, or two things in the world that that kind of drive things. One is opportunity matters. You're going to take what your opportunity matters to you the most. And then perverse incentives. And that's where I think both of these play in. If you go to school choice, which I totally agree with, but who's going to regulate it? The school thing is, this is where there might be a period of adjustment, and I actually have an idea on how to transition to it, and part of it may also be a permanent solution, and that is that you create and there are already programs in place. For example, we have a sell Us Learning is a homeschooling program that even school districts are now paying for. Or you know, Hillsdale Colleges is put together a kindergarten through twelfth grade education model that they're using. The transition would be online and you would have every single grade, every single class, and an ability for people to transition at home, be it with a tutor or with a parent, or with a grandparent or with a neighbor. While the schools then get up and running. And I'll tell you what schools are going to be successful. The schools that put kids in uniforms, insist on discipline that reinforce the fundamentals of reading, writing, math, computers, history, American history especially, And I think those schools would I think you'd have parents competing. Let me give you an an example. You know, New York City public schools are so bad that you have parents literally fighting to get their children into pre k education. If they don't get in early, then the next step, kindergarten that becomes harder. They don't get into that school, first grade becomes almost impossible. And it is and you're paying sixty sixty five seventy grand a year to get into these these private, elite schools in New York and it's you have no idea what it takes. I know parents that have done this. I mean there's so much ass kissing that goes on, and yet you're involved in and you've got to know the right people, and you've got your kindergartener has to get interviewed. You know, it's Linda, you know, you know what I'm talking about. It's nuts it is insane. It's like it's the first thing going to college. Yeah, I mean, and they're fighting and scratching and clawing and and what school. You're almost judged immediately. You know, if you don't get in that system early, you're never getting in, or the odds are very low, you're saying. But I still I still suspect that when public school unions and public school teachers and government officials realize they're going to be losing control of the schools, they are going to find ways to take away accreditation, to say this isn't working, or you don't have access to public sports or varsity sports in high school. That's that's my point. I think there will be a lot of pushback, and if they lose a battle on the choice of schools, then the next step will be to stop it from happening, or to discredit it and use it. Also, I'll give you a quick example that I got to run. But both my kids, who are athletes, and I just worked out a system for each of them, individual system whereby you know, one actually home school the last year of high school and the other was getting out of class for the last two or three years of high school. You know, wouldn't take lunch, but getting out early for training, practice, etc. Like one thirty in the afternoon, and that gave plenty of time, you know, get up, you go to all your classes, you get them out of the way, boom, than you're free for the day. So there's ways around it. Um. But but for most parents, you know, the athletic athletics is not that important. But for many kids it's a ticket. You know, they play lacrosse, if whatever, baseball, basketball doesn't matter, football, any sport. You know, for a lot of kids it's it's a ticket to a much better college than they otherwise would have gotten into academically. Anyway, I appreciate your call. I'm not cutting you short. I'm just out of time. Eight hundred nine one Shaun is a number. Senator Roger Marshall of Kansas attacked by doctor Fauci on a hot mic moment. We'll join us next as we continue, and more of your calls also the next hour as well as we continue. Dot com slash Kennedy

Where coming to your city, saying you'll concie, will all be desire jailer and if you want a little banging y yang, come along. Good. Biden administration is trying to do hard things. That's the business of governing. They are on a very big losing streak. George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, all of them with tears in their eyes for the departure from our democracy that is happening right now today. We must not be complacent or complicit. Freedom is back in style. Welcome to the revolution where I'm coming to your city. Don't want to play our get new Sean Hannity Show behind the scenes, information on breaking news and more bold inspired solutions for America. This is a special edition of the Sean Hannity Show America Trap Behind Enemy Lines, Day number one fifty seven, our two Sean Hannity Show. We'll get to your calls at the bottom of this half hour eight hundred nine for one Shawn, if you want to be a part of the program. I read this article in the Daily Wire where I saw it first. It has to do. The headline is Judge orders FDA to expedite the release of FAISA data on COVID nineteen vaccine of paramount public importance. Now, this stems from a federal judge in Texas ordering the FDA to expedite the release of what is hundreds of thousands of pages of nand documents on the FISA vaccine, rejecting any request by the federal government to give out the data over seventy five year period. Why why it's relevant to now? I mean, that's all you hear, one size fits all vaccine, vaccine, vaccine. We run out of therapeutics and tests, and we don't talk about anti virals or monoclone alant of bodies. But anyway, the judge in this case, Judge Mark Pittman, US District Court for the Northern Districts of Texas, ruling that the FDA has got to release all of the data by FISA for its application for their vaccines Emergency Authorization use at a pace of fifty five thousand pages a month. The FDA had requested that it be allowed to put out the data at a far slower pace of five hundred pages per month. Now, this ruling comes as a result of four Your Request Freedom of Information Act request filed by the Public Health and Medical professionals. The transparency it's a group form to make public the data used by the FDA to grant emergency approvals for in a case of COVID COVID nineteen vaccines. The attorney's name is Aaron Sirie. He represented a group in the court over the four year request, and he said this is a great win for transparency. Removes one of the strangleholds that federal health authorities have had on data needed for independent scientists to offer solutions and address serious issues with current vaccine programs, issues which include waiting immunity, variants, evading vaccine immunity, and as the CDC is confirmed, the vaccines do not prevent transmission. Now, let me take you back in time, because we have played this many times. Remember when they were first pushing the vaccine. You know what were they saying. They were saying, if you get vaccinated, you're not going to get COVID. You can make an argument, oh okay, well, we didn't anticipate that this variant or that variant that is irrelevant. This is what they said. The ruling states that the FDAY has got to turn over twelve thousand pages by the end of this month. Fifty five thousand pages every thirty days until the entirety and omitted redacted portions of the data are submitted by FISA has been released. The person in charge of this case, Aaron Siries, a managing partner of Sirie and Glimstad, had a huge victory with this verdict. He joins us, Now, how are you, sir? I think it is an important victory as well. I'm curious why did they want to roll this out over the course of seventy five years. Why would it be relevant seventy five years from now? It wouldn't be. If the average life expectancy of most Americans is seventy seven years, waiting seventy five years would mean everybody alive today pretty much would be dead before the documents were fully released, and until the documents the data are fully released. As the scientists that comprised the group I represented explained numerous times, they can't do a proper analysis because if even one data set is missing, they don't know if an analysis they've done is incorrect. So waiting seventy five years would effectively mean that the FDA's review of these documents, a review that we the taxpayers paid for um, could not have been a sess, could not have gotten a let's call it a second opinion. You know, pure expect or anticipate that there's going to be an appeal from the f DAY. UM. There's been no signal yet, and my expectation is that they won't appeal. Actually, UM, I think that if the f DAY didn't realize how bad it looked that they wanted to wait that long to release this data, I think there they should realize it now, especially given the judge's decision, which I think made clear how important this data is and that it should be released forthwith. I don't think they're going to get a better outcome in the Fifth Circuit if they do decide to appeal it. But if they choose to do so, you know, we certainly will be arguing that it should be done even quickly. That that would be a good argument. Now, I've interviewed doctors, some I agree with, some I disagree with, and but I'm trying. I tell my audience to you've got to educate yourself. Read as much as you can do your own research. You take into account your medical history, your current medical condition, talk to your doctor. Doctors, the medical professionals you most trust, and then that decision has to come from you. I don't believe in one size fits all medicine either, and I've interviewed people with rare conditions they can't get the vaccine. But we know where the government stands on all of this. And what's fascinating to me in this whole process is there have been people out of call it to those radio show yesterday that do have adverse reactions to the vaccine. Now over whelmingly they will tell you that the vaccine prevent you from being hospitalized or dying. But that's a very different bar and a very different thing from what they were telling us in the beginning. This is what they were saying in the beginning for making sure healthcare workers are vaccinated, because if you seek care and a healthcare facility, you should have a certainty that the people providing that care are protected from COVID and cannot spread it to you. The various shots that people are getting now cover that there. You're okay, you're not going to You're not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations. Vaccines prevent getting infected, prevent getting sick, prevent your hospitalization, our data from the CDCs today suggests you know that that vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick, and that it's not just in the clinical trials, but it's also in real world data. Now we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated person. A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus, the virus does not infect them. The virus cannot then use that person to go anywhere else. All right, So you've got Joe Biden and all these other people saying over and over again, doctor Fauci, if you get vaccinated, you're not going to get COVID? What happened to that? Because now if you've vaccinated, boostered and even of natural immunity, people are getting COVID. Yes they are. And that's precisely why we want all hands on deck, so to speak. We need independent scientists reviewing all of this status so they can help address these issues on the point of address reaction. If it might be helpful me to point out that at my firm, we've got eighteen professionals that all we've been doing. All they do is vaccine related, working a number of them. All they do is vaccine injury cases in the Federal Court of Claims. If you're injured by vaccine, you have to sue the federal government. You can't see the pharmaceutical companies US for all vaccines pretty much because of the law path in nineteen eighty six by Congress. But when it comes to COVID vaccines, you can't even bring a claim in that specialized program where you're suing federal health authorities for injuries because of something called a Presact. If you are injured by a COVID vaccine, there is pretty much no recourse. There's a program called the CICP that's I'm not aware of any attorney. Pharmaceutical companies are protected and you can sue the federal government, but you're not going to get far suing the federal government. Correct. When it comes to all vaccines other than COVID vaccine, yes, you could sue the federal government. You sue actually the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, that is who has respondent if you're injured by those vaccines, and we've been handling those claims well before COVID. That program is paid out over four billion dollars for injuries from other vaccines, but when it comes to COVID vaccine, you can't even bring a claim in that otherwise already very limited program that has statutory caps, where the Department of Justice that's defending against any claim of injury. It's the only consumer product like that. Usually the federal government is protecting consumers from big corporations that might harm them. When it comes to vaccines, that's the only industry I'm aware where the federal government defends the company from any claim by consumers for injury. But going back to COVID vaccine, you can't even go into that program. The pharmaceutical companies have complete immunity visor MADERNA and JJ, so if they're so safe, one has to query why did they need this level of immunity. I also tell you that my phones, you know, my firms phones, email submissions, you know, since the COVID vaccine of release, we've never gotten this level, this torrent of people emailing calling with you know, seeking assistance with regards to COVID vaccines injuries. And I will tell you these are not folks that have issues of vaccines. They're not folks that have us some concerns about vacines. These are folks that one thing got the COVID vaccine. Folks who have concerns about covid vaccine don't call our firm about COVID vaccine injuries because they didn't get the shot. All right, quick break, We'll come back more with Aaron Siri, managing partner of Sirie and Glimstad Siri, who just had a judge rule in his favor in a case against BISA Freedom of Information Act request, and all of the science and information and data will be released in a timely manner. It's not about vaccine hesitancy. It's about adverse reactions that some people have. You know, we hear myocarditis for example, and other things. Spontaneous women that are pregnant spontaneously have a miscarriage. This has all been well published. And what would you say to the people that said, Okay, well, the alternative is no antibodies and that means you die and more millions more would have died. Blah blah blah blah. Now, what I do like about your approach from a different, whole, different point of view is that we've been lectured to follow the science, and you're saying you want other scientists to look at the data and see what they how they interpret it. Right. Look, I would say this in terms of the injuries, just in terms of the types of injuries. For the most part, what we're seeing are calls regarding various neurological neuropathies as well as immune related issues. Now, obviously most not everybody who gets a COVID vaccine ends up up an injury, and not everybody that has COVID ends up getting hurt or dying, right, But there's a percentage in both groups. And I would say that we should care about all people. We should care about people who are who are negatively affected by COVID. COVID does kill pee some people, and it's certainly harms some people, and the vaccine does injure some people, and we should care. And we have room enough not only in our hearts, but also in our system of governments and so forth to take care of everybody. In terms of the approach, I think that what you're saying, Sean makes so much sense. To talk to your doctor, make a personal decision for yourself. Everybody should be able to decide for themselves. But when it comes to mandates, it takes away that choice. By the way, the left wants to quarantine people and like, uh, I don't know and in special interming camps for crying out loud if they choose not to get the vaccine, Utah being the latest. Let me let me ask this question, because I think this is very important. Now. We had on doctor Robert Malone. He since come under tremendous fire. It's interesting because he was the one that created the technology for the m RNA virus, without which we wouldn't have a fizo maderna shot. I'm sorry for the back for the Biza maderna vaccine, the technology, the r r NA vaccine technology. And he's on this program and he said it's not ready for mass use the technology he created. And he said, but with that said, the people that are most at risk sixty five, older, comorbidities, pre existing conditions, compromised immune systems, he would say it would be appropriate for them, But he said them only. And that kind of surprised me from the guy that invented the technology that led to those two very specific vaccines. Look, if a sixty five year old with you know, significant comorbidities doesn't want to take the vaccine, I think that should be their right. And if his twenty year old was completely healthy and is at no risk of COVID wants the vaccine, that should be their right too. This is supposed to be a free country. The problem is, in my opinion, mandates. Going back to what you said again, everybody should be able to choose for themselves. Doctor Malone has his opinion about it. Doctor Fauci has his opinion about it. Medical professionals clearly can disagree about what is best for anyone individual. The one person that shouldn't be making that decision so is the government. It shouldn't be the government telling who should have to get this vaccine to get a job, go to the military, go to school, go to university. That really that's what makes this so problematic and causes the you know, the tension points in our society around around these products and they and they are just products at the end of the day. I'd like to follow up with you, you knows, as this information becomes available to you and as you allow other scientists to look at it, which, by the way, we're following the science here. So I think that's just smart. And maybe there are things that FISA Maderna well in this case as FISA, but maybe the things they missed or maybe things they got right. I'd like to know what you find. So we'll follow this case very closely, and we appreciate you sharing what's going on behind the scenes. I believe in transparency, so this is a big win for people, and I think especially putting something or forcing something into people's bodies, they have every right to know as much as possible about what it is. So thank you for being with us. Absolutely, thank you. And if anybody wants to see those documents and all the data, it's all being made publicly available at the group that we represents website that's PMPT dot org. So everything's available there. And if I may just add one more point, Sean, and it's this you mentioned earlier about you know about interming camps in quarantine and mandates. The CDC director herself has said this vaccine does not stop transmission. If it doesn't stop transmission, and if those are vaccinated, it can also train. Admit it, none of these policies make any sense, even for the very reasons they're staying they need to implement them. Um and you know, should have hope that things have changed dramatically. A fully vaccinated, boostered people, people with natural immunity get it. But I'm just out of time. We'll have you back, Aaron Siri, thank you for being loose. Thank you. All right, quick break, we'll come back. We'll continue, And gentlemen, we'd like to take a second to hear the immortal Bob Grant's thoughts about the world today. Hey, ladies, and Gentlvia is sick. It is getting sicker. Now back to the Seany show really is getting sicker and sicker every single day. I read this news and some days I'm like, oh man, what what what is happening? Watching Share in a panic? The singer Share panicking as mid terms approach. If Democrats lose the House or the Senate, we are ft though it's just the opposite. I don't know what reality she's living in. But if if Republicans lose, we're screwed. I'll put it more gently, all right, Mike and Florida, Mike, you're smart, I'm a dope. You're living in paradise. Where do you live in Florida? And what's the temperature today? Sean, the greatest state in Union. I am in Jacksonville. Temperature right now is fifty five, but it feels like seventies. Beautiful out that's right by the way. When I did play golf, I haven't played in a long time. You've got a great golf course down there with an incredible seventeenth tole uh and you know what I'm talking about? What sawgrass is amazing? Yea driving past it as we speak. So one day I actually played it twice, like the second time I was down there, and I played it me and I know you're not supposed to do this. Me and my friends probably hit six or seven balls each on seventeen. We just kept hitting them. A couple of them went in the water, but we shouldn't have. Probably, I bet you about half the people do that out there, and why not. Yeah, I'm sure, I'm sure they probably do. Nobody nobody yelled at me where it's all good. What's going on? There's more. There's more provy ones in that lake than you could. I wonder if somebody goes in, they've got us in somebody and once a year to probably clean that sucker out, right, I bet just once a week that's probably true. If if you don't know it's saw Grass has a seventeenth are three. I forget how many yards, maybe I'm one sixty five or something like that. Um. And it's an island literally, And when when they play tournaments at Sawgrass, h you know, professional tournaments, on the last day they put the pin in this, they place it in an area where it's so easily will fall all go way past the pin and off the green, depending on where you land on the green, because it's kind of like a two tiered green in the sense that you got a big hill there. As you know. Yes, yes, I'm not playing golf lately, so I forget it. Yeah, it's a great golf course. It's a great area in Florides, a wonderful state. And I was in x New York or thirty forty years ago and done the best move I ever made. But it's good for you, Jacksonville. We're also the home Iran de Santis. And it was intrigued back comment your caller made yesterday about Trump in twenty twenty four and playing that Trump runs and I'm hoping that Ron is a potential VP candidate, although that he said that he likes to be governor. But I'm reading in some sites that Trump doesn't like the Santis, and I'm thinking it's fake news too, because the Santist is a great candidate, just like Trump is. You know, I've been I've been following it on the I know both people pretty well. Um, is there anything to it? I don't know. I mean, I don't know. I'm I just don't know. UM. I agree with you that the Santis has been a great governor and I think he will be reelected this year. I hope so. I mean, it'd be a disaster if he wasn't. I think that they would make a great team. I thought I thought Mike pennsman a great vice president and you know, sadly at the end of the presidency they had this falling out on there's one issue I wish that didn't happen. I prefer some immunity in a little bit. We have enough people out there that hate any conservative and every Republican that you know, the less in fighting and I don't know, battles to go back and forth, the better offer. I think we're going to ultimately be the more where united on the same page, with the same agenda, fighting for the same things, which is the same of the Republic, all hands on deck. I think we're better off. I think DeSantis is a really smart fighter and very a very good tactician. And I think Trump's instincts and guts are exceptional and they're without equal and that's why I think they'd make a good team. I hope it ends up that way. You know, Look, it's it's what we've got twenty twenty two. Um, time is gonna tell um. There's no doubt that I think the President, meaning President Trump, is looking to run again. Otherwise I don't think he would have gone out to Arizona the way he did. The crowd he ad was massive. I've never seen any other pol pelitician attract crowds like he does, and the amount of support that he does, and the agenda worked. We can now in one year of the Biden presidency, we can now compare and contrast the two governing philosophies, and one is an abysmal failure on every level and the other was tremendously successful. And I care about success. Now, some people don't like Donald Trump's style, Okay, fine, but the policies you can't really argue didn't work. They worked should no matter who is president, and if they're a Republican, you said this. If it's Reagan, they found a reason to hate Ronald Reagan, If it was Bush, they found a reason to hate Bush a silver spoon in his mouth, or Reagan was too old. So it doesn't matter who our candidate is, they will find a way to hate them and then try to push that agenda. And you know that certainly. So Trump is just our best fighter, and that's what really kills him and drives them crazy. Listen, nobody's fought like him in my political lifetime, and he's hated for it. And if you want to talk about somebody that was able to expose the underbelly of the swamp, the sewer that is Washington, DC, the stench of corruption, it's him. And I've never met one person in my life that takes up so much space and other people's brains, and Donald Trump, it's hilarious to me. I had something that did you ever postulate or kick this around about how do we change Washington? And the only thing I've ever thought about was how do we decentralize it? So these folks are in Washington twenty four to seven thinking of ways of how to ruin the country, And can we ever make it so that congressman and senators stay in their home states or districts and legislate through secure zoom, just like we've all had to during COVID, where they don't go to Washington and conspire with each other to see how they're going to ruin the country. I'm curious if that ever would get traction as you kick that around, I'm curious if I ever keep these folks. The sad thing is, and this is the danger of New Green dealism is and this was where the phony accounting came into play, is they have they factor in what they call sunset provisions. So Mansion, for example, was saying one hundred and seventy five million. And I actually was Lindsay Graham that insisted the accounting gimmicks that the Democrats and the CBO were using get removed from from the way the CBO scores as a phrase they used scores the bill. And when we got down to okay, if you eliminate the sunset provisions, which are the realistic numbers, because a sunset provision means, oh, we're only we're only going to have pre K education for one year or two years or whatever it is. When we know if that ever passes, we're stuck with it in perpetuity ie Obamacare. So once you take out the accounting gimmicks, that one point seven five trillion became five point one trillion with three trillion in debt that we're putting on our kids and grandkids. So you know what, I like to see a dramatic twenty percent cut across the board, twenty five percent even in government. Absolutely. I think one of Trump's greatest successes that one of the reasons the economy was thriving under his leadership was energy, obviously, independence, netnex border, and number two, getting rid of the bureaucracy that is putting a stranglehold on business and lowering taxes. You know, I'm reading today that California, I mentioned this earlier, they want to double their taxes and have a single payer system in California. That's thirty percent of people's income state income tax, not even talking about local. Then you got property tax on top of it. Then you have your forty percent you're gonna pay Nationally, You're looking at eighty percent of your eighty cents out of every dollar go in a government if Newsom goes forward with that. But I think you'll lose half the population of California if he post tries to pull that off. But anyway, you bring up good points philosophically, I think the country I don't know why I understand it to some extent emotionally. You know, when people here, I don't have to worry about college, I don't have to worry about my retirement. I don't have to worry about my healthcare. The government's going to provide everything for me. It's it's for a piece some people. It's emotionally gratifying and reassuring to people. But the reality is every time it's been tried, every name it's been given, every manifestation it's taken on, it all results in the same thing. More poverty, broken promises, and a loss of freedom. That's that's socialism, statism, authoritarianism, communism, it's all. It's it's one and the same, you know, to varying degrees. Thank you, Mike, was the Pons Craig, North Carolina. Craig, how are you glad you called? Hey? Sean? Thanks taking my call. Um. I just want to talk about something you've mentioned before about school choice. And fundamentally and philosophically I agree with you. But as I learned in grad school and economics with a brilliant professor, or two things in the world that that kind of drive things. One is opportunity matters. You're going to take what your opportunity matters to you the most. And then perverse incentives. And that's where I think both of these play in. If you go to school choice, which I totally agree with, but who's going to regulate it? The school thing is, this is where there might be a period of adjustment, and I actually have an idea on how to transition to it, and part of it may also be a permanent solution, and that is that you create and there are already programs in place. For example, we have a sell Us Learning is a homeschooling program that even school districts are now paying for. Or you know, Hillsdale Colleges is put together a kindergarten through twelfth grade education model that they're using. The transition would be online and you would have every single grade, every single class, and an ability for people to transition at home, be it with a tutor or with a parent, or with a grandparent or with a neighbor. While the schools then get up and running. And I'll tell you what schools are going to be successful. The schools that put kids in uniforms, insist on discipline that reinforce the fundamentals of reading, writing, math, computers, history, American history especially, And I think those schools would I think you'd have parents competing. Let me give you an an example. You know, New York City public schools are so bad that you have parents literally fighting to get their children into pre k education. If they don't get in early, then the next step, kindergarten that becomes harder. They don't get into that school, first grade becomes almost impossible. And it is and you're paying sixty sixty five seventy grand a year to get into these these private, elite schools in New York and it's you have no idea what it takes. I know parents that have done this. I mean there's so much ass kissing that goes on, and yet you're involved in and you've got to know the right people, and you've got your kindergartener has to get interviewed. You know, it's Linda, you know, you know what I'm talking about. It's nuts it is insane. It's like it's the first thing going to college. Yeah, I mean, and they're fighting and scratching and clawing and and what school. You're almost judged immediately. You know, if you don't get in that system early, you're never getting in, or the odds are very low, you're saying. But I still I still suspect that when public school unions and public school teachers and government officials realize they're going to be losing control of the schools, they are going to find ways to take away accreditation, to say this isn't working, or you don't have access to public sports or varsity sports in high school. That's that's my point. I think there will be a lot of pushback, and if they lose a battle on the choice of schools, then the next step will be to stop it from happening, or to discredit it and use it. Also, I'll give you a quick example that I got to run. But both my kids, who are athletes, and I just worked out a system for each of them, individual system whereby you know, one actually home school the last year of high school and the other was getting out of class for the last two or three years of high school. You know, wouldn't take lunch, but getting out early for training, practice, etc. Like one thirty in the afternoon, and that gave plenty of time, you know, get up, you go to all your classes, you get them out of the way, boom, than you're free for the day. So there's ways around it. Um. But but for most parents, you know, the athletic athletics is not that important. But for many kids it's a ticket. You know, they play lacrosse, if whatever, baseball, basketball doesn't matter, football, any sport. You know, for a lot of kids it's it's a ticket to a much better college than they otherwise would have gotten into academically. Anyway, I appreciate your call. I'm not cutting you short. I'm just out of time. Eight hundred nine one Shaun is a number. Senator Roger Marshall of Kansas attacked by doctor Fauci on a hot mic moment. We'll join us next as we continue, and more of your calls also the next hour as well as we continue. Dot com slash Kennedy