All right, thank you Scott Shannon, and thanks to all of you for being with us. Right down our toll free telephone number if you want to be a part of this extra ravaganza, it is eight hundred and nine for one Sean. If you want to join us news, I promise you'll never get from the state run corrupt legacy media mob officially dead as of November fifth, last year, because nobody trusts them because they lie so often. We have a lot of polling that has come out today. We'll start with that, and this is joint polling two of our favorite posters. I remind you that both Trafalgar, the Trafalgar Group that's Robert Kahaley and Insider Advantage as Matt Towery, both now the twenty sixteen presidential election, twenty twenty presidential election, twenty twenty four presidential election. And what's amazing about them is they poll Donald Trump correctly more than anybody. They have one question that they put out, what is your opinion of President Trump's position that Iran must be prevented from developing a nuclear weapon by any means necessary. That is a very strong question for a polster. What is your opinion of President Trump's position that Iran must be prevented from developing from developing a nuclear weapon by any means necessary. They approved seventy four point four percent, disapproved twenty two point nine percent. And it just tells me that, you know, regardless of the chatter and the radicalism of the left and some isolationist others, the world understands. And this is why why do you think all the countries in the Middle East have been eerily silent because they're all cheering for Israel to knock out these nuclear sites, because they all fear Iranian hegemony. Which is why Donald Trump, very successfully in his first term, was able to create an unprecedented alliance that he never got credit for intelligence sharing among the US and Israel and the Saudis and the Emirates and the Jordanians and the Egyptians and all of it against Iranian hegemony. Not one country in that region wants the Iranian regime to ever have a nuclear weapon, because all they do is for men terrorism, and each country individually has radicals within their ranks, and so they're constantly threading needles, and unfortunately it often results in them trying to placate both sides or turning a blind eye towards the radicalism. And then, by the way, that has to stop in these countries. They have to start arresting and they have to start eliminating those people in their countries that have bought into this radicalism. Another poll is out Harvard Harris. Eighty five percent say Tehran must never get the bomb. Fifty four percent directly back a US strike on their nuclear assets, sixty percent would support Israel if talks fail. It goes across party lines, and it couldn't be any more specific that, you know, giving up a nuclear and Richmond program has got to be a precondition to the US accept any deal, and that would have to be immediate, although I don't know. It's what one of the most amazing things is. And Elon Musk did link up Starlink for people to have some connection to the outside world because the regime shut off any access to the Internet. However, people are able to bypass it with the starlink connection. But they are leaving Tehran in droves because President Trump said get out now while you can, and they're leaving. I mean, the convoy is it's it's unbelieved to see it's bumper to bumper traffic. It's sort of like in the lead up in the days leading up to you know, a hurricane that is projected to hit your town or your city. You have one top Democrat and this now goes to the heart of where the Democratic Party is. And you know, Democratic leaders have sided with these you know, they've been silent or complicit with these pro terrorist campus protesters. They've tolerated virulent anti semitism in their own ranks in the halls of Congress on these college campuses. They've taken up the cause of you know, wife beating, gang banging, criminal illegals. They've tried to block the National Guard from interfering with anti ICE rioters even as they're arresting and doing the job, and the Constitution gives them jurisdiction through the supremacy clause. But interfering with anti ICE rioters that they try to burn city cities down and light it was like they did about Joe's cognitive state and open borders and the economy and pretty much on everything else about Donald Trump. Well, now they found another noxious cause to get behind. Democrats are now lining up what to support the Iranian regimes, you know, desire and ambition for producing nuclear weapons, which Iranian leaders have vowed to use to wipe Israel and the US off the face of the earth. You have a top Democratic Senator, Hillary Clinton's vice presidential nominee, no Less, now trying to block President Trump from helping Israel take out Iranian Iran's nuclear program. Good, by the way, good luck defending that position. In the twenty twenty six mid term, Senator Tim Kaine introduced a resolution seeking to prevent the US from getting involved in a military conflict with Iran without congressional approval. The resolution reaffirms existing law directing the President to end any use of US armed forces for hostilities against Iran. Blah blah blah. That this is now the party of radicalism. The only exceptions to that rule, and we'll play him later in the program today is Senator John Fetterman. He's actually calling on Israel to show no mercy and to take out the Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Kamanie, and Fetterman told the Washington Free Beacon Israel should use its successful campaign against against Hazbalah in Lebanon, which culminated in the assassination of the thirty two year leader Hassan Norasla and Neraza. I'm sorry, Nasralla a model for how to deal with Iran, and just like Nazraala, Fetterman replied. When asked whether the Jewish state should target Khamanee, he said, in fact, it should have been when Israel began to dismantle Iran. Now they've taken out their nuclear scientists. This Democratic Party, before we get into there's a lot of specifics and a lot of news to share with you today, but we saw it this weekend, the party of compact and love. You know, the base of the Democratic Party. I would argue it is the Democratic Party. There are no moderate voices but for John Fetterman, who's under constant attack by the radical left and the likes of Chucky Schumer and Hakim Jeffries. They are scared to death of their own party members that can. It's controlled by Jasmine Crockett and the squad and AOC and Elizabeth Warren and Grandpa Bernie. I mean, you saw all these left wing protesters this weekend in cities all across the country. In some cases they were left wing protesters in New York openly supporting Iran. The Democratic Party is the crazy party. They're the party of radical coastal elitists that you know that champion the rights of men to play women's sports. I mean, think about this. They are so out of touch. You've got people out in the street. They're dressed like Islamic extremists calling for the destruction of it is from the river to the sea. How often have we discussed that being said on college campuses, you know, virulent hatred, anti semitism. These protests have gone on now for nearly two years, since October seventh. I'm not sure what part of murder, rape, torture, beheading, and kidnapping they don't understand, but they clearly don't understand or don't want to understand it. The same party that turned this you know, suspected human trafficker, gang member, illegal immigrant, they've become the party of Abrego Garcia. They turned this guy into a folk hero until the polls show yeah, this is backfiring on you. Okay, well we'll amandon that position now. The party that blocks highways, attacks law enforcement federal buildings all because Ice, you know, went into Los Angeles and they found criminal illegal immigrants convicted of murder and child rape and gang activity and other heinous crimes to keep the people, the law abiding citizens of Los Angeles safe. The same party that you know turned a blind eyed didn't say a word about the calls for assassination of President Trump or Elon Musk that burned Tesla's uh in dealerships around the country, firing bullets into Tesla dealerships, you know, burning Tesla charging stations. Oh what did Elon Musk do? He rescued astronauts and he found, you know, hundreds of billions of waste, fraud and abuse. You know, they think it's corrupt in a constitutional crisis that hundreds of billions of dollars on deism, wokeism, transgenderism, l g B, t q ism is being spent, not even in this, around the around the globe. You know, the US Senate Democrats supporting championing the right the rights of men to play women's sports. The same party that supports supports racist DEI policies over meritocracy and hard work. The same party that believed the Russia hoax buys abuse. They sat silent as long as it was against Donald Trump. The same party that didn't care the Statute of Limitations had run out on this issue, of which was a misdemeanor in New York turned into a novel legal theory by Alvin Bragg, just so they can call Donald Trump a convict. I mean, the things that they didn't care about, the phone evaluation of mar A Lago, They didn't care about the double standard when it came to rating mar A Lago but not rating Joe Biden's four locations where he had top secret classified information. The same party that lacks any self awareness with this ridiculous nationwide no kings protests this weekend. You know, we had an election. They lost, Donald Trump won, and they helped him win, and he won every swing state and the popular vote. And now they're acting like, you know, they don't care about acts of violence. They're mostly peaceful vandalism, mostly peaceful intimidation, you know, attacking law enforcement, mostly peaceful. You know, it's it's it's pretty bizarre. Donald Trump is now demanding the unconditional surrender from Iran. The sterness language to date, the President warning earlier today he's losing patience with Iran and for quote unconditional surrender, saying that he wouldn't target the country's leader. We know where he is, he said, but we're not going to target come a knee for now. Doesn't mean it's off the table, and a series of social media posts as of this afternoon, he said, the US knows where the Iranian Supreme Leader is hiding. He is an easy target, but it's safe there. We're not going to take him out or kill him, at least for now. Our patients is wearing thin unconditional surrender, he wrote. In a separate post, he said, Tehran has lost control of Iran's airspace. We now complete total control of the skies over Iran, and they have good skytrackers and other defensive equipment and plenty of it. But it doesn't compare to American made, conceived and manufactured weaponry. Nobody does it better than the good old US of A. And Trump used the word wei, but it wasn't immediately clear if that meant that the US is taking a more active role in Israel's unfolding attacks. The President returned to Washington, got home about four point thirty this morning on Air Force one to deal with matters at home. He's not being specific about it. He has never wavered in his space in terms of where he stands let me tell you what the three options are. Where we are right now. The Israelis took out two of their three nuclear sites. The third site, I'll go into great specificity. There are really three ways to take out that site. The first two options are not good. Off One, the Israelis can go it alone with a tactical nuke. Nobody wants that option, not a good option. Option two, they can send in commandos. That would be a great risk and harm potentially to Israeli fighters. Not the best option, but controlling the skies. The best option would be bunker buster bombs, but Israel, according to reports I can't confirm one hundred percent, they don't have bunker busters. That would take the US not only to provide it, but probably to complete the mission, because they don't have the B fifty two that would be necessary to deliver that bomb, the mother of all bombs, thirty thousand pounds. And it's a whole process to knock out this one site. It's buried three hundred feet deep into the ground. And so those are the three options on the table now. And the question is is the world better without the number one state sponsor of terror having nuclear weapons? How many rockets would need to be fired into America before you would demand, as an American citizen that your country fight back because Israel and I've told the story many times. I've been to these border towns and cities that have been hit with tens of thousands of rockets. I've seen the Golden Dome in the Iron Dome in action. I have been in the terror tunnels. They have taken enough. They deserve a peaceful solution, assuming this mission can be completed. It is not without risk. I want to be very clear, but the Trump doctrine is clear. They can't have nukes, and he still doesn't believe in forever wars. He wants this knocked out and done and over with. Then it will be up to the Israelis if they take out their power grid, which is gas driven, take out their ability to make money, which would be to knock out their refineries, an easy attack considering most of the refineries are on one little island. Eight hundred ninety four one Shawn is a number. If you want to be a part of the program, we're going to go on the ground in Tel Aviv. What has life been like there with all the hundreds and hundreds of ballistic missiles they've been able to shoot down, according to the idea, about ninety five percent of them. But it's still, you know, pretty unbelievable. The President now demanding unconditional surrender from the Iranians, and we know exactly where the so called Supreme Leader is hiding. He is an easy target but is safe there. We're not going to take him out kill at least not for now, but we don't want missiles shot at civilians or American soldiers. Our patients is wearing thin. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I mean it is. You know, there is some internal I am staying away from the noise among certain people, but I will tell you there is a lot of noise, and there's a lot of people that have agendas. Here's my agenda. My agenda is frankly in sync with what the President believes. I believe in the Trump doctrine, in this case, the Trump dot What is the Trump doctrine here? The Trump doctrine is Iran cannot have nuclear weapons. If you don't understand that, I can't I there's no way I can educate you to the level you need to be educated at to understand it. I'm not going to waste my time. The American people get it, and I go back to the insider advantage in Trafalgar Pol coming out today, what is your opinion of President Trump's position that Iran must be prevented from developing a nuclear weapon by any means necessary. Seventy four point four percent approved, twenty two point nine percent disapprove, two point seven percent no opinion. Harvard Harris eighty five percent say hey, Ron must never get the bomb, fifty four percent back of US strike on their nuclear assets, sixty percent with support Israel. If talks fail, it goes across party lines. America backs the strength. That's where we are. The inner circle of Iran Supreme leader has been hollowed out. This is a report that the eighty six year old Supreme leader Ali Kamani has seen his main military and security advisors killed by Israeli airstrikes, leaving major holes in his inner circle. I mean they took out his nuclear signedists, they took out some of the top leaders of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, and one report that he is even negotiating a potential asylum move out of Iran and into Russia. I'm sure putin will be their arms open. But you know, the president is now seeking a real end to the escalation. Now the question is they were there's one site remaining. To me the most important thing and if you ask what the goals should be, and I know people have different views on this, and I accept that people have different views on this. Do I think the Israelis have you know, the Israelis are the country that have withstood that that the you know, hundreds of thousands of missiles being fired into their country. The Iranians have been you know, they help plot, plan and scheme with the Iranian Revolutionary Guard and their CUDS forces. The October seventh attack, that's the equivalent of forty thousand dead Americans in a day based on extrapolated out population sizes, et cetera. But also the kidnapping, the torture, the beheading, you know, the rape, and everything else in between. So the Israelis, you know, at the end of the day, as far as I'm concerned, once the nuclear threat is forever neutralized, the world is a safer place. The Israelis have every right in my view, And if you had let's say, the one town that I was in in what twenty fourteen or fifteen, there wrote a border town with Gaza. In the previous ten years have been hit with ten thousand missiles. One little town, and I mean little. This is the town where kids playing underground bunker playgrounds. Because it only takes twelve thirteen seconds for one of these missiles when they're fired from Gaza, what you can see with the naked eye to make it into that town. And it's amazing to me that this town has been able to survive in spite of this never ending onslaught. How many missiles fired into America would you take before you would wipe out the enemy that did this? And the you know, look, we have at least twenty four dead in Israel. They are targeting, you know, large civilian population areas like Tel Aviv. And we'll get a report at the top of the hour about that they have now activated their new aerial defense system for the first time since its inception. It's the Barrock Megan meaning Lightning Shield for the first time Sunday night, saying they intercepted and destroyed multiple Iranian drones and if you're Israel, how many more it has to stop? This is now the missiles are getting bigger two thousand pound ballistic missiles they're building for their ambition is four thousand pound bombs. I mean, now you're talking about mass casualties. And does anybody ask yourself, maybe you do doubt, maybe you don't think they would do it. I personally think they would do it. And that is if you marry radical Islamic terrorism with the number one state sponsor of terror that has provided funding to Hamas and Hezbola and the Islamic Jihad and the Huti they fired directly into Israel. And then you add into that the Iraqi militia, the Syria militia, and you have one common denominator and that is that is the Mulls in Iran. And they have been hell bent on this whole thing. Now, what to know about the three options? Option one not a good option to use the tactical nuke under any circumstances. However, Irans for now fuel enrichment plant is the one remaining. It is a fortress. It is built deep within the mountains, up to three hundred feet underground, located about one hundred miles south of Tehran. Remember, the people of Tehran have been born by Donald Trump to get out of town and get out quickly. There's one facility remaining on Israel's hit list and the world's hit list, and it may take American bust bunking buster bunker bombs to do it, you know, short of commandos. You know, getting into the facility a very dangerous operation by any measure, but three hundred feet underground, and you know America has these, you know, thirty ton bunker buster bombs, and you know this what's called a fifty seven a b massive ordinance penetrator is thought to be capable of reaching the facility. Maybe it would take two of them. I'm not sure. I'm not an expert in bunker busters. While Israel has surprised Western intelligence in the past with the scope of its arms and strategies, we don't know. Nothing suggests that they have the means to penetrate this one nuclear sites defenses and get deep into the ground where it is to inflict the damage so that no more enrichment of uranium can take place. Now anyway, this this one place was was FIR completed in two thousand and nine. It's about one hundred miles south of Tehran, one of three major nuclear Richmond sites. Iran spent years fortifying this facility, which has been able to avoid most major attacks from Israel and elsewhere. Tehran has made sure the facility can survive airstrike attacks, making this a much harder target. And the way a bunker buster works is the bomber pilot uses a guidance system to lock the bomb onto the target, then exit the area. As the bomb travels to its orbit, the first charge will detonate, clearing a path for a second charge. The second charge would then enter the target following the opening created by the first charge, and the thing would then explode. Now sounds a little complicated. I can show you and make visuals for you on TV tonight so you fully completely understand it. But that's what it's going to take, and that would probably be be us. Look as far as the left goes, and you know, for years, I always knew Pap Buchanan and understood that there were certain things we'd never agree on. And I always viewed Pat as kind of like an isolationist, and you know, had certain America first policies but then had views about other countries that I found at times even reprehensible. But you know, we just agreed to disagree, and I agree to disagree with some other people. Marco Levin actually had the great one, had a great article in the New York Post today and he talks about isolationists, and he really rightly points out that isolationism, I mean, it's not the Trump doctrine of taking out Iran's nukes is not in America first, and not believing in long protracted wars is not isolationism. I mean, if we learned anything from World War Two and never Chamberlain meeting with Hitler and Munich and coming back and from claiming peace in our time, peace and our time, that that was naive and dumb and stupid. And you know, isolationism can also be appeasement, and you can also One of the biggest parts that is unspoken about the MAGA agenda is common sense. And nuclear weapons in the hands of the number one state sponsor of terror, that can't death to America, death to Israel. It just goes against common sense when you have the opportunity to prevent them from ever getting that power, and you can. And when you listen to people that almost and Mark is right, they're incoherent. They don't even agree upon themselves, and there's there's different factions of that that ideology, but it's you know, it's certainly not peace through strength. It's certainly not common sense. It's certainly if you think it's okay, and you want to try to call this program and explain to me how allowing the Iranian is to continue their their pursuit of a nuclear weapon and likely getting one and building out these two thousand and four thousand pound ballistic missiles, where are we going to be in six months or a year? The world will be held hostage. And this is an opportunity with Prime Minister net and Yahoo and President Trump at the helm where you deal with genocidal terrorists is Nazi regime. And you know, and the President did, to his credit, he bent over backwards to try to convince them to choose the path of peace, and they have chose not to do that. And he said, it's a big mistake, you know, and it's been brilliant. It doesn't mean it is without risk. It doesn't mean it is not dangerous. But this is a dangerous world. You don't define peace as the absence of conflict, of the absence of war. Now, for those that may have concerns. We don't want to be dragged into a long quagmire, as they say, or a long protracted war. That's part of the that's part of the Trump doctrine too, and that's not the plan here to send American troops on the ground, and nor should it be in my view. I think the President has it exactly right. They can't have nukes. And if it's a joint operation or an American operation to take out this final side, and it's going to be what it's going to be, and then Israel at that point will make up their minds whether they want to take out the Iranian ability to have power in their country because that grid can be taken out because they own the skies. And then they'll decide if the regime will have any opportunity to make money if they decide to take out their refineries. Again, an easy target when you control the skies. The most amazing thing that I've seen in terms of video is when Trump called for the immediate evacuation of Tehran. Everybody's they're taking Donald Trump's word for it, you know, but it's this this bunk or buster would have to be dropped from an American aircraft which would have wide ranging ramifications. We have troops in the area that would need protection. Again, there's nothing, nothing, nobody that can make an argument that this is a risk free operation. There is always risk, you know. And he said if Iran should have signed the deal, I told them to sign what a waste of human life. Simply stated, Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. I support the Trump doctrine and also the doctrine that we can't have forever wars. It's going to be go in strike, achieved the direct the the directive, and warn them if they dare to come after one American one American installation, that there will be hell to pay. And then if they do, then there should be hell to pay. You know. Whatever motivations other people have, that's on them. I know what we have to do here.

All right, thank you Scott Shannon, and thanks to all of you for being with us. Right down our toll free telephone number if you want to be a part of this extra ravaganza, it is eight hundred and nine for one Sean. If you want to join us news, I promise you'll never get from the state run corrupt legacy media mob officially dead as of November fifth, last year, because nobody trusts them because they lie so often. We have a lot of polling that has come out today. We'll start with that, and this is joint polling two of our favorite posters. I remind you that both Trafalgar, the Trafalgar Group that's Robert Kahaley and Insider Advantage as Matt Towery, both now the twenty sixteen presidential election, twenty twenty presidential election, twenty twenty four presidential election. And what's amazing about them is they poll Donald Trump correctly more than anybody. They have one question that they put out, what is your opinion of President Trump's position that Iran must be prevented from developing a nuclear weapon by any means necessary. That is a very strong question for a polster. What is your opinion of President Trump's position that Iran must be prevented from developing from developing a nuclear weapon by any means necessary. They approved seventy four point four percent, disapproved twenty two point nine percent. And it just tells me that, you know, regardless of the chatter and the radicalism of the left and some isolationist others, the world understands. And this is why why do you think all the countries in the Middle East have been eerily silent because they're all cheering for Israel to knock out these nuclear sites, because they all fear Iranian hegemony. Which is why Donald Trump, very successfully in his first term, was able to create an unprecedented alliance that he never got credit for intelligence sharing among the US and Israel and the Saudis and the Emirates and the Jordanians and the Egyptians and all of it against Iranian hegemony. Not one country in that region wants the Iranian regime to ever have a nuclear weapon, because all they do is for men terrorism, and each country individually has radicals within their ranks, and so they're constantly threading needles, and unfortunately it often results in them trying to placate both sides or turning a blind eye towards the radicalism. And then, by the way, that has to stop in these countries. They have to start arresting and they have to start eliminating those people in their countries that have bought into this radicalism. Another poll is out Harvard Harris. Eighty five percent say Tehran must never get the bomb. Fifty four percent directly back a US strike on their nuclear assets, sixty percent would support Israel if talks fail. It goes across party lines, and it couldn't be any more specific that, you know, giving up a nuclear and Richmond program has got to be a precondition to the US accept any deal, and that would have to be immediate, although I don't know. It's what one of the most amazing things is. And Elon Musk did link up Starlink for people to have some connection to the outside world because the regime shut off any access to the Internet. However, people are able to bypass it with the starlink connection. But they are leaving Tehran in droves because President Trump said get out now while you can, and they're leaving. I mean, the convoy is it's it's unbelieved to see it's bumper to bumper traffic. It's sort of like in the lead up in the days leading up to you know, a hurricane that is projected to hit your town or your city. You have one top Democrat and this now goes to the heart of where the Democratic Party is. And you know, Democratic leaders have sided with these you know, they've been silent or complicit with these pro terrorist campus protesters. They've tolerated virulent anti semitism in their own ranks in the halls of Congress on these college campuses. They've taken up the cause of you know, wife beating, gang banging, criminal illegals. They've tried to block the National Guard from interfering with anti ICE rioters even as they're arresting and doing the job, and the Constitution gives them jurisdiction through the supremacy clause. But interfering with anti ICE rioters that they try to burn city cities down and light it was like they did about Joe's cognitive state and open borders and the economy and pretty much on everything else about Donald Trump. Well, now they found another noxious cause to get behind. Democrats are now lining up what to support the Iranian regimes, you know, desire and ambition for producing nuclear weapons, which Iranian leaders have vowed to use to wipe Israel and the US off the face of the earth. You have a top Democratic Senator, Hillary Clinton's vice presidential nominee, no Less, now trying to block President Trump from helping Israel take out Iranian Iran's nuclear program. Good, by the way, good luck defending that position. In the twenty twenty six mid term, Senator Tim Kaine introduced a resolution seeking to prevent the US from getting involved in a military conflict with Iran without congressional approval. The resolution reaffirms existing law directing the President to end any use of US armed forces for hostilities against Iran. Blah blah blah. That this is now the party of radicalism. The only exceptions to that rule, and we'll play him later in the program today is Senator John Fetterman. He's actually calling on Israel to show no mercy and to take out the Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Kamanie, and Fetterman told the Washington Free Beacon Israel should use its successful campaign against against Hazbalah in Lebanon, which culminated in the assassination of the thirty two year leader Hassan Norasla and Neraza. I'm sorry, Nasralla a model for how to deal with Iran, and just like Nazraala, Fetterman replied. When asked whether the Jewish state should target Khamanee, he said, in fact, it should have been when Israel began to dismantle Iran. Now they've taken out their nuclear scientists. This Democratic Party, before we get into there's a lot of specifics and a lot of news to share with you today, but we saw it this weekend, the party of compact and love. You know, the base of the Democratic Party. I would argue it is the Democratic Party. There are no moderate voices but for John Fetterman, who's under constant attack by the radical left and the likes of Chucky Schumer and Hakim Jeffries. They are scared to death of their own party members that can. It's controlled by Jasmine Crockett and the squad and AOC and Elizabeth Warren and Grandpa Bernie. I mean, you saw all these left wing protesters this weekend in cities all across the country. In some cases they were left wing protesters in New York openly supporting Iran. The Democratic Party is the crazy party. They're the party of radical coastal elitists that you know that champion the rights of men to play women's sports. I mean, think about this. They are so out of touch. You've got people out in the street. They're dressed like Islamic extremists calling for the destruction of it is from the river to the sea. How often have we discussed that being said on college campuses, you know, virulent hatred, anti semitism. These protests have gone on now for nearly two years, since October seventh. I'm not sure what part of murder, rape, torture, beheading, and kidnapping they don't understand, but they clearly don't understand or don't want to understand it. The same party that turned this you know, suspected human trafficker, gang member, illegal immigrant, they've become the party of Abrego Garcia. They turned this guy into a folk hero until the polls show yeah, this is backfiring on you. Okay, well we'll amandon that position now. The party that blocks highways, attacks law enforcement federal buildings all because Ice, you know, went into Los Angeles and they found criminal illegal immigrants convicted of murder and child rape and gang activity and other heinous crimes to keep the people, the law abiding citizens of Los Angeles safe. The same party that you know turned a blind eyed didn't say a word about the calls for assassination of President Trump or Elon Musk that burned Tesla's uh in dealerships around the country, firing bullets into Tesla dealerships, you know, burning Tesla charging stations. Oh what did Elon Musk do? He rescued astronauts and he found, you know, hundreds of billions of waste, fraud and abuse. You know, they think it's corrupt in a constitutional crisis that hundreds of billions of dollars on deism, wokeism, transgenderism, l g B, t q ism is being spent, not even in this, around the around the globe. You know, the US Senate Democrats supporting championing the right the rights of men to play women's sports. The same party that supports supports racist DEI policies over meritocracy and hard work. The same party that believed the Russia hoax buys abuse. They sat silent as long as it was against Donald Trump. The same party that didn't care the Statute of Limitations had run out on this issue, of which was a misdemeanor in New York turned into a novel legal theory by Alvin Bragg, just so they can call Donald Trump a convict. I mean, the things that they didn't care about, the phone evaluation of mar A Lago, They didn't care about the double standard when it came to rating mar A Lago but not rating Joe Biden's four locations where he had top secret classified information. The same party that lacks any self awareness with this ridiculous nationwide no kings protests this weekend. You know, we had an election. They lost, Donald Trump won, and they helped him win, and he won every swing state and the popular vote. And now they're acting like, you know, they don't care about acts of violence. They're mostly peaceful vandalism, mostly peaceful intimidation, you know, attacking law enforcement, mostly peaceful. You know, it's it's it's pretty bizarre. Donald Trump is now demanding the unconditional surrender from Iran. The sterness language to date, the President warning earlier today he's losing patience with Iran and for quote unconditional surrender, saying that he wouldn't target the country's leader. We know where he is, he said, but we're not going to target come a knee for now. Doesn't mean it's off the table, and a series of social media posts as of this afternoon, he said, the US knows where the Iranian Supreme Leader is hiding. He is an easy target, but it's safe there. We're not going to take him out or kill him, at least for now. Our patients is wearing thin unconditional surrender, he wrote. In a separate post, he said, Tehran has lost control of Iran's airspace. We now complete total control of the skies over Iran, and they have good skytrackers and other defensive equipment and plenty of it. But it doesn't compare to American made, conceived and manufactured weaponry. Nobody does it better than the good old US of A. And Trump used the word wei, but it wasn't immediately clear if that meant that the US is taking a more active role in Israel's unfolding attacks. The President returned to Washington, got home about four point thirty this morning on Air Force one to deal with matters at home. He's not being specific about it. He has never wavered in his space in terms of where he stands let me tell you what the three options are. Where we are right now. The Israelis took out two of their three nuclear sites. The third site, I'll go into great specificity. There are really three ways to take out that site. The first two options are not good. Off One, the Israelis can go it alone with a tactical nuke. Nobody wants that option, not a good option. Option two, they can send in commandos. That would be a great risk and harm potentially to Israeli fighters. Not the best option, but controlling the skies. The best option would be bunker buster bombs, but Israel, according to reports I can't confirm one hundred percent, they don't have bunker busters. That would take the US not only to provide it, but probably to complete the mission, because they don't have the B fifty two that would be necessary to deliver that bomb, the mother of all bombs, thirty thousand pounds. And it's a whole process to knock out this one site. It's buried three hundred feet deep into the ground. And so those are the three options on the table now. And the question is is the world better without the number one state sponsor of terror having nuclear weapons? How many rockets would need to be fired into America before you would demand, as an American citizen that your country fight back because Israel and I've told the story many times. I've been to these border towns and cities that have been hit with tens of thousands of rockets. I've seen the Golden Dome in the Iron Dome in action. I have been in the terror tunnels. They have taken enough. They deserve a peaceful solution, assuming this mission can be completed. It is not without risk. I want to be very clear, but the Trump doctrine is clear. They can't have nukes, and he still doesn't believe in forever wars. He wants this knocked out and done and over with. Then it will be up to the Israelis if they take out their power grid, which is gas driven, take out their ability to make money, which would be to knock out their refineries, an easy attack considering most of the refineries are on one little island. Eight hundred ninety four one Shawn is a number. If you want to be a part of the program, we're going to go on the ground in Tel Aviv. What has life been like there with all the hundreds and hundreds of ballistic missiles they've been able to shoot down, according to the idea, about ninety five percent of them. But it's still, you know, pretty unbelievable. The President now demanding unconditional surrender from the Iranians, and we know exactly where the so called Supreme Leader is hiding. He is an easy target but is safe there. We're not going to take him out kill at least not for now, but we don't want missiles shot at civilians or American soldiers. Our patients is wearing thin. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I mean it is. You know, there is some internal I am staying away from the noise among certain people, but I will tell you there is a lot of noise, and there's a lot of people that have agendas. Here's my agenda. My agenda is frankly in sync with what the President believes. I believe in the Trump doctrine, in this case, the Trump dot What is the Trump doctrine here? The Trump doctrine is Iran cannot have nuclear weapons. If you don't understand that, I can't I there's no way I can educate you to the level you need to be educated at to understand it. I'm not going to waste my time. The American people get it, and I go back to the insider advantage in Trafalgar Pol coming out today, what is your opinion of President Trump's position that Iran must be prevented from developing a nuclear weapon by any means necessary. Seventy four point four percent approved, twenty two point nine percent disapprove, two point seven percent no opinion. Harvard Harris eighty five percent say hey, Ron must never get the bomb, fifty four percent back of US strike on their nuclear assets, sixty percent with support Israel. If talks fail, it goes across party lines. America backs the strength. That's where we are. The inner circle of Iran Supreme leader has been hollowed out. This is a report that the eighty six year old Supreme leader Ali Kamani has seen his main military and security advisors killed by Israeli airstrikes, leaving major holes in his inner circle. I mean they took out his nuclear signedists, they took out some of the top leaders of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, and one report that he is even negotiating a potential asylum move out of Iran and into Russia. I'm sure putin will be their arms open. But you know, the president is now seeking a real end to the escalation. Now the question is they were there's one site remaining. To me the most important thing and if you ask what the goals should be, and I know people have different views on this, and I accept that people have different views on this. Do I think the Israelis have you know, the Israelis are the country that have withstood that that the you know, hundreds of thousands of missiles being fired into their country. The Iranians have been you know, they help plot, plan and scheme with the Iranian Revolutionary Guard and their CUDS forces. The October seventh attack, that's the equivalent of forty thousand dead Americans in a day based on extrapolated out population sizes, et cetera. But also the kidnapping, the torture, the beheading, you know, the rape, and everything else in between. So the Israelis, you know, at the end of the day, as far as I'm concerned, once the nuclear threat is forever neutralized, the world is a safer place. The Israelis have every right in my view, And if you had let's say, the one town that I was in in what twenty fourteen or fifteen, there wrote a border town with Gaza. In the previous ten years have been hit with ten thousand missiles. One little town, and I mean little. This is the town where kids playing underground bunker playgrounds. Because it only takes twelve thirteen seconds for one of these missiles when they're fired from Gaza, what you can see with the naked eye to make it into that town. And it's amazing to me that this town has been able to survive in spite of this never ending onslaught. How many missiles fired into America would you take before you would wipe out the enemy that did this? And the you know, look, we have at least twenty four dead in Israel. They are targeting, you know, large civilian population areas like Tel Aviv. And we'll get a report at the top of the hour about that they have now activated their new aerial defense system for the first time since its inception. It's the Barrock Megan meaning Lightning Shield for the first time Sunday night, saying they intercepted and destroyed multiple Iranian drones and if you're Israel, how many more it has to stop? This is now the missiles are getting bigger two thousand pound ballistic missiles they're building for their ambition is four thousand pound bombs. I mean, now you're talking about mass casualties. And does anybody ask yourself, maybe you do doubt, maybe you don't think they would do it. I personally think they would do it. And that is if you marry radical Islamic terrorism with the number one state sponsor of terror that has provided funding to Hamas and Hezbola and the Islamic Jihad and the Huti they fired directly into Israel. And then you add into that the Iraqi militia, the Syria militia, and you have one common denominator and that is that is the Mulls in Iran. And they have been hell bent on this whole thing. Now, what to know about the three options? Option one not a good option to use the tactical nuke under any circumstances. However, Irans for now fuel enrichment plant is the one remaining. It is a fortress. It is built deep within the mountains, up to three hundred feet underground, located about one hundred miles south of Tehran. Remember, the people of Tehran have been born by Donald Trump to get out of town and get out quickly. There's one facility remaining on Israel's hit list and the world's hit list, and it may take American bust bunking buster bunker bombs to do it, you know, short of commandos. You know, getting into the facility a very dangerous operation by any measure, but three hundred feet underground, and you know America has these, you know, thirty ton bunker buster bombs, and you know this what's called a fifty seven a b massive ordinance penetrator is thought to be capable of reaching the facility. Maybe it would take two of them. I'm not sure. I'm not an expert in bunker busters. While Israel has surprised Western intelligence in the past with the scope of its arms and strategies, we don't know. Nothing suggests that they have the means to penetrate this one nuclear sites defenses and get deep into the ground where it is to inflict the damage so that no more enrichment of uranium can take place. Now anyway, this this one place was was FIR completed in two thousand and nine. It's about one hundred miles south of Tehran, one of three major nuclear Richmond sites. Iran spent years fortifying this facility, which has been able to avoid most major attacks from Israel and elsewhere. Tehran has made sure the facility can survive airstrike attacks, making this a much harder target. And the way a bunker buster works is the bomber pilot uses a guidance system to lock the bomb onto the target, then exit the area. As the bomb travels to its orbit, the first charge will detonate, clearing a path for a second charge. The second charge would then enter the target following the opening created by the first charge, and the thing would then explode. Now sounds a little complicated. I can show you and make visuals for you on TV tonight so you fully completely understand it. But that's what it's going to take, and that would probably be be us. Look as far as the left goes, and you know, for years, I always knew Pap Buchanan and understood that there were certain things we'd never agree on. And I always viewed Pat as kind of like an isolationist, and you know, had certain America first policies but then had views about other countries that I found at times even reprehensible. But you know, we just agreed to disagree, and I agree to disagree with some other people. Marco Levin actually had the great one, had a great article in the New York Post today and he talks about isolationists, and he really rightly points out that isolationism, I mean, it's not the Trump doctrine of taking out Iran's nukes is not in America first, and not believing in long protracted wars is not isolationism. I mean, if we learned anything from World War Two and never Chamberlain meeting with Hitler and Munich and coming back and from claiming peace in our time, peace and our time, that that was naive and dumb and stupid. And you know, isolationism can also be appeasement, and you can also One of the biggest parts that is unspoken about the MAGA agenda is common sense. And nuclear weapons in the hands of the number one state sponsor of terror, that can't death to America, death to Israel. It just goes against common sense when you have the opportunity to prevent them from ever getting that power, and you can. And when you listen to people that almost and Mark is right, they're incoherent. They don't even agree upon themselves, and there's there's different factions of that that ideology, but it's you know, it's certainly not peace through strength. It's certainly not common sense. It's certainly if you think it's okay, and you want to try to call this program and explain to me how allowing the Iranian is to continue their their pursuit of a nuclear weapon and likely getting one and building out these two thousand and four thousand pound ballistic missiles, where are we going to be in six months or a year? The world will be held hostage. And this is an opportunity with Prime Minister net and Yahoo and President Trump at the helm where you deal with genocidal terrorists is Nazi regime. And you know, and the President did, to his credit, he bent over backwards to try to convince them to choose the path of peace, and they have chose not to do that. And he said, it's a big mistake, you know, and it's been brilliant. It doesn't mean it is without risk. It doesn't mean it is not dangerous. But this is a dangerous world. You don't define peace as the absence of conflict, of the absence of war. Now, for those that may have concerns. We don't want to be dragged into a long quagmire, as they say, or a long protracted war. That's part of the that's part of the Trump doctrine too, and that's not the plan here to send American troops on the ground, and nor should it be in my view. I think the President has it exactly right. They can't have nukes. And if it's a joint operation or an American operation to take out this final side, and it's going to be what it's going to be, and then Israel at that point will make up their minds whether they want to take out the Iranian ability to have power in their country because that grid can be taken out because they own the skies. And then they'll decide if the regime will have any opportunity to make money if they decide to take out their refineries. Again, an easy target when you control the skies. The most amazing thing that I've seen in terms of video is when Trump called for the immediate evacuation of Tehran. Everybody's they're taking Donald Trump's word for it, you know, but it's this this bunk or buster would have to be dropped from an American aircraft which would have wide ranging ramifications. We have troops in the area that would need protection. Again, there's nothing, nothing, nobody that can make an argument that this is a risk free operation. There is always risk, you know. And he said if Iran should have signed the deal, I told them to sign what a waste of human life. Simply stated, Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. I support the Trump doctrine and also the doctrine that we can't have forever wars. It's going to be go in strike, achieved the direct the the directive, and warn them if they dare to come after one American one American installation, that there will be hell to pay. And then if they do, then there should be hell to pay. You know. Whatever motivations other people have, that's on them. I know what we have to do here.