In this "Best of Sean Hannity" show , Sean covers the history of COVID-19 with Senator Rand Paul.
Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com
The best of Sean Hannity is on nowhere, coming to your city, saying you an We'll all be desire and if you want a little banging, you come along. Just because you win doesn't mean you're one. I come from a state where I was not entitled to become the governor. Do you think it hurts your credibility at all that you won't accept the finance of the FBI in this particular case. I'm prepared to accept that not everything in the Dulci area is one hundred percent accurate. If you have vaccinated and your family members have vaccinated those who are eligible, and that is obviously very young children are not yet eligible, that you can enjoy the holiday. Freedom is back in style. Welcome to the Rebel coming to you want to play a concert? New Sean Hannity Show. More behind the scenes information on breaking news, and more bold inspired solutions for America. This is a special edition of The Sean Hannity Show America Trapped Behind Enemy Linesday number sixty eight sixty eight Coming up next our final news round up and Information Overload Hour. I just round up Information Overload Hour eight hundred nine for one Shawn. If you want to be a part of the program. Now, all this money from the NIH, to the ECO Alliance, to the funding of the Wuhan Virology Lab where we all knew, the world knew that they did coronavirus research, and they did gain A function research. This is not at all a surprise to anybody. Now, Richard Ibright with the NIH corrects untruthful assertions by the NIH Director Collins and doctor Fauci that the NIH had not funded gain A function research in Wuhan. Now, between the emails of doctor Fauci, and of course we had the leak of what was a nine hundred documents released by the Intercept, we already determined that Fauci was lying and that Rand Paul was the guy that was telling us the truth. Well, let's take you back and remind you of this exchange between Fauci and Rand Paul. Will you, in front of this group categorically say that the COVID nineteen could not have occurred to serial passage in a laboratorium. I do not have any accounting of what the Chinese may have done, and I'm fully in favor of any further investigation of what went on in China. However, I will repeat again. The nih An NID categorically has not funded gain a function research to be conducted in the Wuhan Institute of supported In the US, we have eleven labs doing it and you have allowed it. Here. We have a committee to do it, but the committee has granted every exemption. You're fooling with mother nature here. You're allowing superviruses to be created with a fifteen percent mortality. It's very dangerous and gives a huge mistake to share this with China. And it's a huge mistake to allow this to continue in the United States. And we should be very careful to investigate where this virus came from. I fully agree that you should investigate where the virus came from, but again, we have not funded gain a function research on this virus in the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Matters say it. There was research. There was research done with doctors and doctor Barrick. They have collaborated on gain of function research where they enhance the SARS virus to infect human airway sales and they did it by merging a new spike protein on it, that is gain of function. That was joint research between the Wuhan Institute and doctor Barrick, you can't deny it. I totally resent the law that you are now propagating, Senator, because if you look at the viruses that were used in the experiments that were given in the annual reports that were published in the literature, it is molecularly impossible. No one saying those it is moleculars virus caused the pandemic. What we're alleging is the gain of function research was going on in that lab and NIH funded it. That is not away from it. It meets your definition, and you are obstruscating the truth. Let me just finished. I want everyone to understand that if you look at those viruses and that's judged by quality find virologists and evolutionary biologists, those viruses are molecularly impossible. Results are the pandemic. We're saying they are gain of function viruses because every animal viruses that became more transmissible in human and you funded it, and you admit the truth, and you are implying that what we did was responsible for the deaths of individual I totally resent that. And if anybody's lying here, Senator, it is you. Now we have a freedom of information Act reveal that in fact, FAUCI and the NIH in fact funded this UH this gain of function research at the Wuhan Virology Lab. We have more than nine hundred pages of documents released now detail how the US funded the research by Eco Health Alliance that's your tax dollars funded through the NIH on several types of coronaviruses at this very virology lab in the Wuhan Institute. And the Intercept first reporter. The documents described the work of this group. They subcontract the money out to Eco Health Alliance that's a health organization in the US, and they use the funding to conduct research at this particular lab. Now, these documents were released following ongoing Freedom of Information Act litigation by the Intercept against the NIH, and basically we now have a roadmap to the high risk research that led to the origins of this coronavirus. And the grant provided the Eco Health Alliance was a whopping three point one million dollars, including five ninety nine thousand that the Wuhan Drology Lab used to identify and alter bat coronaviruses to infect humans. That grant proposal even warned of the potential dangers associated with experiments like this quote. Field work involves the highest risk of exposure to stars and other CEO s, coves, COVID meaning coronaviruses while working in caves with high bat density overhead, and the potential for fecal dust to be inhaled. In other words, let me say it this way, I told you so doesn't even begin to cover it here. And that's the tweet from Senator Rampaula Kentucky who joins us now, Senator you were more right, I think than you even knew at the time, Yesean. And here's the real dagger in the heart for these people. The NIH now is saying, Yet eco Health did do gain to function viruses that were unknown BAT viruses were taken from caves, merged together with SARS virus, another coronavirus, and they did come out more deadly. Not only did they do this research, they didn't didn't report it. I think NAH is trying to shift the buck here a little bit. They're trying to say, well, maybe eco health is now going to be thrown under the bus. NIH didn't know about this. But the letter is still confusing in the sense that it says, oh, this was an unexpected or an inadvertent thing. There's no truth to that. If you take an unknown virus and you combine it with the stars virus, you don't know if it's going to be more or less. It's unknown, but it's not unexpected. In fact, it's a crap shoot. You combine a virus and you find out if it in fact. So for that's what they're studying is does it have gain a function or not? And so sometimes it does. But to say this is unexpected, therefore it's not gain a function. Research is this sort of parsing of words. Now you're being too kind. It's not parsing words. It's outright lying now because this is what we now know. Remember that January thirty first email too Fauci. It says one of the genomes has that breaking down the sequence of COVID nineteen they stated emphatically looked like it was manipulated by human beings. That's gain of function. Now this is the same doctor Fauci in twenty twelve that said, even if it caused a worldwide pandemic, he still supports research and to gain a function with these viruses, which is insanity and why one red scent from America went to this lab in China. In Woolhan is beyond any comprehension I have, Senator, Yeah, And this is the thing when you when you look at this, this is the philosophy of collectivism. The individuals don't matter, even if five million people have died. To the Saucie, it's the collective that matters. And he thinks the collective wisdom of gain and function research is worth it even if you have a pandemic. But that's so very much a heartless sort of you know, who were other collectivists who thought a few people in experimentation might might not be too big a deal. Well, we know them. There was a totalitarian you know, tyrants of the twentieth century. So yeah, we have to be alarmed that this guy still leads to the country. He's been asked, you know, firsthand, in the last month. Do you still trust the Chinese? It's yes. Should we still be funding research in China? Yes? Right now. This eco Health Alliance that's been lying to government, apparently according to the NIH is still about a five year contract. There's a twenty a contract. A five year contract. You mean we're going to continue to give money to the communist Chinese over this when they should be paying US trillions of dollars after what they did to US and the entire world. My understanding is their contract Eco Health contract with the WU wanted to goes through twenty twenty five, and there was an interruption. President Trump stopped it. Dr Pouce got it started again. And my understanding is that money is still flowing from the US tax player to Wuhan. It's incomprehensible to me, Senator, he really is. First, I'm glad you're right. Now, let's take it a little bit further. Who is this micro molecular biologist Richard Ebright? You know him, I know him, going to communicated with him. He has been fighting this battle long before it became politicized. He was worried about this from a purely scientific point of view. He's not a partisan, he you know is you know, he just he's in this because of the science and because he's worried that we could get pandemics that would lead from the lab. And I think he told me been involved in two thousand and five with us. But there's also another famous scientist. His name is Kevin Esbelt from MIT. He wrote an op ed in the Washington Post in the last two weeks, and he said that this type of research risks the very foundation of civilization. He thinks there could be a civilization threatening pandemic if a virus gets out that has like a fifty percent mortality or seventy five percent mortality. He thinks we shouldn't be doing this. And this is a scientist that invented the Crisper technology for gene therapy to try to cure genetic disease. So this is, you know, a guy that is in the world's a leap with regard to genetics and recombined genetics. And he wrote an op ed thing we should do it, and guess what not one Democrat on Capitol Hill will let me have an investigative hearing. We've been denied hearings by Patty Murray and the Health Committee. We've been denied hearings by Gary Peters in the Homeland Security, two committees I sit on that should be investigating this. No investigations being done. Well, that's what that's what makes this election in twenty twenty two even even that much more important here. But the reality is is that Fauci lied and we have the evidence that he knew that what was going on with the Eco Alliance, and he knew the gain of function research was happening on coronaviruses, and we knew that they knew the entire time, which means when he testified back in May to your committee and you had that exchange with him, that he lied to you. Now, Roger Stone, if you might recall, I'll use him as but one example. You know, pre dawn raid, guns drawn frogmen in the backyard, fake news, CNN cameras. But the crime of quote lying to Congress, wasn't that the crime that they were charging him with? Correct me if I'm wrong. Yeah, And I think that's the definition of injustice when one party is treated one way, when Republicans are concerns are treated with the full brunt forth of government police, and then if you're a Democrat, nothing happened to you. So you know, I referred doctor Altie to the Department of Justice because he did live. He's committed a crime. I think what's come out from the NIAH today is further proof that he lied, and we will confront him with this. He's coming back to our committee in the next couple of weeks, we will confront him. And the thing is is we have at the very least allowed the American public to see that he has a self interest in covering this up, because if any of this attaches to him in the NIH any responsibility for the pandemic, you can see there's a great deal of moral coupabuility that attaches to five million people dying worldwide from research that he's been supporting. It's just an unbelievable thing. Quick break right back more with Rampaul on the other side. Hannity ninetiestern tonight on the Fox News Channel. This is the Sean Hannity Show, now heard on over six hundred and sixty radio stations across America. Thanks to all of you from making this happen, John Hannity, As we continue with Kentucky Senator around Paul, is there anything any recourse the United States has to go and get the compensation to every country, every American in particular, that suffered because of what they did to the world unleashing this virus and then lying about it. The greatest evidence I think we have, Senator, is that there was another travel band that nobody ever wants to talk about and that was the Chinese government's travel band, that people in other parts of China were forbidden to travel to Wuhan, and if you were in Wuhan, you couldn't travel to any other part of China, which pretty much tells the tells the entire story here. And meanwhile, you could leave Wuhan and gold to anywhere else in the world. So they didn't care about the world. They just cared about China. I think this should be part of every trade negotiation, every United Nations discussion. The UN's largely effectless because China can simply veto things that occur in the Security Council. But this effect is a whole world. Five million people have died worldwide. I think most people in the world now believes that China let it cover up. They got rid of their database, the virus database, disappeared from the Internet. They have obscured the fact that people were sick with that research facility with COVID like symptoms. So I think the whole world, if it were unified, could punish in China. The United States alone, we have a tough time doing it, but it should be part of trade negotiations, should be part of every negotiation we have with them, and for goodness sakes, at the very least, we should stop funding their lab I mean, I introduced an amendment and it passed unanimously, but it's never become law because the House of Representatives never took up the bill. Believable. Let me ask you this, do you believe you know Joe Mansion pretty well? Do you believe Joe Mansion? Do you believe Kristin Cinema are going to hold the line on this three point five trillion dollar bill, which I guess now has turned into a one point seven to one point nine trillion dollar bill. Do you believe they'll stay strong on the issue of keeping the filibuster or do you think they'll try and get rid of it? And what other power grabs do you potentially see. I think they're sincere, and I know what it likes to stand up to people in your own party and to stand up against majority, So I think they are showing some courage. Now, I'm not promising you that the end result that they vote for is going to be a whole lot better. It's going to be less evil, but it's still going to be bad to the country. Whether we borrow two trillion or three and a half trillion, even if they whittle it down to two trillion, my guests, as they do it by not counting the out years. So instead of a ten year bill, we're gonna have a two year bill that cost looks like it cost less, but over ten it's still going to cost the same. And if you put in these permanent free stuff, free college, free daycare, free cell phones, all the free stuff they're offering, once that becomes permanent, it becomes sort of the mandatory spending. Congress never ever does anything to rein it in. So I truly think this is a really bad bill, whether it's two trillion or three and a half, But I do I do commend them for at least standing up, you know, against the really strong pool of the socialist wing of their party. Pretty unbelievable times who we're living in, Senator Rampaul Kentucky, great job, You're right, Fauci lied. I wish I wish he would get the proper justice, which would be being fired, but I don't see that coming anyway. I appreciate you being one of us eight hundred and nine for one seawan. You want to join us, quick break, right, back. You are listening to the best of the Sean Hannity Show, and stay tuned. More memorable moments, interesting guests, and a lot of fun coming up next. As we continue with Kentucky Senator around Paul, is there anything any recourse the United States has to go and get the compensation to every country, every American in particular, that suffered because of what they did to the world unleashing this virus and then lying about it. The greatest evidence I think we have, Senator, is that there was another travel band that nobody ever wants to talk about, and that was the Chinese government's travel band. That people in other parts of China were forbidden to travel to Wuhan, and if you were in Wuhan, you couldn't travel to any other part of China, which pretty much tells the entire story here. And meanwhile, you could leave Wuhan and go to anywhere else in the world. So they didn't care about the world. They just cared about China. I think this should be part of every trade negotiation, every United Nations discussion. The UN's largely secklist, because China can tymply veto things that occur in the security Council. But this effect is the whole world. Five million people have died worldwide. I think most people in the world now believes that China let a cover up. They got rid of their database, the virus database disappeared from the internet. They have obscured the fact that people were sick with that research facility with COVID like symptoms. So I think the whole world, if it were unified, could punish in China. The United States alone, we have a tough time doing it, but it should be part of trade negotiations, should be part of every negotiation we have with them, and for goodness sakes, at the very least, we should stop funding their lab I mean, I introduced an amendment and it passed unanimously, but it's never become law because the House of Representatives never took up the bill. Unbelievable. Let me ask you this. Do you believe you know Joe Mansion pretty well? Do you believe Joe Mansion? Do you believe Kristin Cinema are going to hold the line on this three point five trillion dollar bill, which I guess now has turned into a one point seven one point nine trillion dollar bill. Do you believe they'll stay strong on the issue of keeping the filibuster or do you think they'll try and get rid of it? And what other power grabs do you potentially see. I think they're sincere, and I know what it likes to stand up to people in your own party and to stand up against majority, So I think they are showing some courage. Now I'm not promising you that the end result that they vote for is going to be a whole lot better. It's going to be less evil, but it's still going to be bad for the country whether we borrow two trillion or three and a half trillion, even if they whittle it down to two trillion, my guests, as they do it by not counting the out years. So instead of a ten year bill, we're gonna have a two year bill that cost looks like it cost less, but over ten it's still going to cost the same. And if you put in these permanent free stuff, free college, free daycare, free cell phones, all the free stuff they're offering, once that becomes permanent, it becomes sort of the mandatory spending. Congress never ever does anything to rein it in. So I truly think this is a really bad bill, whether it's two or three and a half. But I do I do commend them for at least standing up, you know, against the really strong tool of the socialist wing of their party. Pretty unbelievable times. Who we're living in, Senator Ram Paul Kentucky, great job. You're right, Fauci lied. I wish I wish he would get the proper justice, which would be being fired, but I don't see that coming anyway. I appreciate you being one of us eight one hundred and nine for one. Sean, you want to join us quick break right back. You are listening to the best of the Sean Hannity Show, and stay tuned. More memorable moments, interesting guests, and a lot of fun coming up next and we continue. John Rich joins us, of course, a big and Rich and the host of the Pursuit on Foxnation dot Com. You know, it's interesting, whether you disagree or disagree, it's not even a debate anymore about VAXX or dome facts. It's not because they made up their mind. And so at this point, is is there another solution that we can save people from losing their careers and their jobs and their benefits and their pensions. I'm looking at the human side. You know, I don't listen. I get a flu shot every year and people half my friends think I'm nuts. Linda thinks I'm nuts, and then the other half of my friends think they do the same thing. But you have these discussions. I don't know why people make the decisions they make, but clearly nobody's going to be able to convince them at this point. I don't believe everything that can be said has been said. Well that is correct, and at the end of the day, the heart of the government tries to force feed people and can cattle prod them into a decision that they're not comfortable with the stiffer their necks are going to get. And this comes down to individual freedom. Listen, Sean, we know that vaccinated people can still catch the virus, and they can still spread the virus that's been established. We know these things. So people take all of it into account and they make up their own decision. Sean, there's a million people a weekend cramming into college football stadiums, and they're not wearing masks, and they're not having to show vax papers, and they're not having to take a PCR test before they walk in, but the police have to and the nurses have to. They weren't vaccinated last year when they were out being the heroes. So it's it's all nonsense, and it's in its hypocrisy, and it is causing major division in this country and it's not going to end well if somebody doesn't pull the rip cord and allow people to be free again. John Rich, we appreciate you being with us Rednecked Riviera or Whiskey the Pursuit on Fox Nation Com Fox Business Network, Thank you, sir for being with us. Charlie Daniels, your next interview, it's going to be a blockbuster. We appreciate you being on board. Thank you sir. Thank you, sir. We'll see tonight. Thank you. Eight hundred and nine for one. Shaun is a numbered. Hey, there's still a lot more ahead on the Best of the Sean Hannity Show. Stay tuned for more right afternoons on this station.