James Van Der Beek, 48, died of colorectal cancer. Nate Shelman, also 48, admits he's never had a colorectal cancer screening. Nate invited other audience members, over 48, whom have never had a screening to call in.

James Van Der Beek, 48, died of colorectal cancer. Nate Shelman, also 48, admits he's never had a colorectal cancer screening. Nate invited other audience members, over 48, whom have never had a screening to call in.

Weekdays, 3pm to 7pm on Newstalk KBOI 93.1 FM and 670 AM.

Weekdays, 3pm to 7pm on Newstalk KBOI 93.1 FM and 670 AM.

The Nate Shelman Show

Yes, we talked about colorectal cancer screenings for another hour

Nate focuses on the House Judiciary Hearing with Pam Bondi this morning and the tension on both sides, the coverage of Nancy Guthrie, and the ACLU filing a lawsuit against Idaho law enforcement agencies regarding actions taken in Wilder in October of last year.

Nate focuses on the House Judiciary Hearing with Pam Bondi this morning and the tension on both sides, the coverage of Nancy Guthrie, and the ACLU filing a lawsuit against Idaho law enforcement agencies regarding actions taken in Wilder in October of last year.

KBOIAM-12994

James Van Der Beek, TV and film actor, father, husband, passed today at 48 years old of colorectal cancer. Nate shares that he's never had a colonoscopy or colon cancer screening. Guys whom have had multiple colonoscopies call in to motivate Nate to get one done.

James Van Der Beek, TV and film actor, father, husband, passed today at 48 years old of colorectal cancer. Nate shares that he's never had a colonoscopy or colon cancer screening. Guys whom have had multiple colonoscopies call in to motivate Nate to get one done.

James Van Der Beek and why Nate hasn't had a colonoscopy yet

In this episode, Nate Shelman dives into the Save Act, a contentious piece of legislation that's got everyone talking. He's joined by a caller, Joe, who shares his concerns about the bill's potential impact on voter suppression. Nate and Joe engage in a lively discussion about the importance of voter ID, the difference between mail-in and absentee voting, and the notion of a "poll tax." They also touch on the history of voter suppression and the need for accurate identification. This conversation is a must-listen for anyone interested in the intricacies of the Save Act and its potential effects on the democratic process.

In this episode, Nate Shelman dives into the Save Act, a contentious piece of legislation that's got everyone talking. He's joined by a caller, Joe, who shares his concerns about the bill's potential impact on voter suppression. Nate and Joe engage in a lively discussion about the importance of voter ID, the difference between mail-in and absentee voting, and the notion of a "poll tax." They also touch on the history of voter suppression and the need for accurate identification. This conversation is a must-listen for anyone interested in the intricacies of the Save Act and its potential effects on the democratic process.

Why shouldn't someone show an ID to vote?!?!

https://api.omny.fm/orgs/a7b0bd27-d748-4fbe-ab3b-a6fa0049bcf6/clips/c2d7b862-2e90-41c1-a2c4-b3ee0013708b/transcript

Yes, we talked about colorectal cancer screenings for another hour

In 1 playlist(s)

The Nate Shelman Show

Social links

Follow podcast

Recent clips