Police interviewing techniques have been a controversial topic here and around the globe.
There have been countless, high-profile cases where someone has been convicted but later exonerated – and their interrogations questioned.
In New Zealand, Teina Pora was wrongfully convicted of murder and rape largely based on a confession given during a lengthy police interview.
And more recently, Harry Matchitt had his manslaughter conviction quashed after a so-called “false confession”. He spent three years behind bars, and is now seeking $600,000 in compensation.
So, why do people confess to things they didn’t do?
Today on The Front Page, Forensic Psychologist Ghazi Metoui joins us to discuss the psychology behind police interviews.
Follow The Front Page on iHeartRadio, Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.
You can read more about this and other stories in the New Zealand Herald, online at nzherald.co.nz, or tune in to news bulletins across the NZME network.
Host: Chelsea Daniels
Editor/Producer: Richard Martin
Producer: Jane Yee

Critics say National's promise of 30 weeks parental leave isn't enough
17:52

Why a narrow strait could tip the Middle East crisis further
22:35

Is now the best time for first-home buyers to act?
15:18