This episode of the Chuck Toddcast features a deep dive into the AI governance crisis with two of the leading experts in the field. First, Miriam Vogel — president and CEO of EqualAI — joins the show to explain her organization's mission of establishing meaningful AI guardrails at a moment when American consumers are deeply skeptical of big tech and less than 1% of companies have anything resembling strong AI governance policies. Vogel argues that good governance means corporate leadership must take direct responsibility for AI deployment, walks through her five best practices for responsible AI adoption, and pushes back on the idea that federal preemption should override state-level regulation — noting that companies are pushing hard against state regulation precisely because they know most of the actual rules will be written in court cases over the next few years. She warns that we're seeing tremendous investment in AI without commensurate ROI so far, that gender and regional gaps in AI adoption are already emerging, and that the public urgently needs to be empowered with real knowledge about AI's upsides as well as its risks. Vogel asks the question that should keep every executive up at night: are we actually ready for AI to make decisions without humans in the loop? And she argues that transparency — letting employees and consumers see how AI errors play out — will be absolutely essential to safe deployment.

Then former Deputy National Security Advisor Anne Neuberger joins to discuss what global AI governance should look like between superpowers, and whether the arms race framing between the U.S. and China is actually helpful or harmful. Neuberger argues AI is fundamentally different from nuclear regulation because it's being developed by the private sector rather than by governments, and questions whether it was a mistake to let the private sector spearhead this technology in the first place. Drawing on her cybersecurity background, she walks through how governments learned to combat ransomware: extending existing rules for fiat currencies to cover cryptocurrencies (which had helped criminals evade detection), disincentivizing ransom payments, and helping companies recover without paying — a template she argues could apply to AI regulation. Neuberger says AI drug development should be an international win-win rather than a zero-sum arms race, but acknowledges the national security applications make competition unavoidable, with advantages now measured in months rather than years and dangerously inadequate military-to-military communication between the U.S. and China. They debate whether an "FDA for AI models" might be necessary, that existing regulations can be updated to cover AI without requiring new legislation, and that AI will ultimately transform defensive cybersecurity by allowing companies to double-check their infrastructure at scale. Her bottom line: laws always trail technology, but governments have key roles to play in identifying cyber risks, helping companies patch their infrastructure, and ensuring America's defenders aren't left behind as Chinese models close the six-month gap.

Try ShipStation free for 60 days with full access to all features, No credit card needed! Go to https://ShipStation.com and use code TODDCAST for 60 days for free!

Thank you Wildgrain for sponsoring. Visit http://wildgrain.com/TODDCAST and use the code "TODDCAST" at checkout to receive $30 off your first box PLUS free Croissants for life!

Link in bio or go to https://getsoul.com & enter code TODDCAST for 30% off your first order.

Timeline:

(Timestamps may vary based on advertisements)

00:00 Chuck Todd’s introduction

02:45 Miriam Vogel joins the Chuck ToddCast

03:00 Equal AI’s mission is to establish AI guardrails

04:15 American consumers are extremely skeptical of big tech

05:00 Tech companies need to address users’ concerns & questions

07:00 Less than 1% of companies have strong AI governance policies

08:30 Some companies are working hard towards AI best practices

09:30 State vs. federal regulation for tech companies & AI

10:15 Why are companies pushing back against state level regulation?

12:15 Most of AI regulation will come down to the courts

14:00 We need more certainty of expectations from AI companies

16:15 AI is a disruptor, we can’t pretend it won’t be everywhere

17:30 Are we ready for AI to make decisions without humans in the loop?

18:15 Good governance means leadership must take responsibility for AI

19:15 If agentic AI without a human was outlawed, how would companies respond?

20:30 We’re seeing tremendous investment without the ROI so far

21:30 AI will scale at an exponential rate

22:15 We’re seeing gender and regional gaps in AI adoption

23:00 The public needs to be empowered with knowledge of AI’s upside 

24:15 The five best practices for AI adoption

26:00 Employees and consumers will see how AI errors play out

27:15 Transparency will be key to safe AI deployment

28:45 Anne Neuberger joins the Chuck ToddCast

29:15 What should AI global governance look like between superpowers?

30:30 AI is different than nuclear regulation because it’s developed privately

31:15 Was it a mistake to let the private sector spearhead AI development?

32:30 Cybersecurity concerns and risks 

33:45 Cryptocurrency helped criminals evade detection & enforcement

34:30 Every ransom payment encourages more cyber attacks & ransomware

35:45 Cyber threat intel was shared across governments

36:45 Governments extended rules for fiat currencies to cryptocurrencies

37:30 Governments had to disincentivize ransom payments

38:30 Goal was to help companies recover without paying a ransom

39:15 Both companies & government should share burden of security

40:45 AI is being framed as an arms race between U.S. and China

41:30 AI drug development should be an international win-win

42:30 The arms race framing applies to national security applications

44:15 The speed of innovation is so fast, a race feels unwinnable

45:30 Advantages in AI race will be measured in months, not years

46:15 There’s no good military to military comms between U.S. & China

48:30 Does government have any chance to effectively regulate AI?

49:15 It took a major cyberattack for government to figure out cybersecurity

50:00 Government took existing regulations and updated them for digital age

52:00 Existing regulations can also be updated to regulate AI without legislation

53:00 Should there be an FDA for AI models?

54:15 There needs to be a balance between innovation and regulation

55:15 Laws trail tech. Need to find regulation that protects the public

56:45 AI will transform defensive cybersecurity

57:30 AI can double check defensive cyber infrastructure at scale

59:15 We need to prepare our defenders, China’s models are 6 months behind

1:00:15 Companies will need help to patch and update their infrastructure

1:01:15 The government has a very key role to play in AI cybersecurity

1:02:15 Government has to clearly identify where the cyber risks are