You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Let make sure you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome to the Buck Brief. Let's talk about the death of OJ Simpson and race politics in America, the legacy of the OJ verdict, all of that on today's show. So as we know, OJ Simpson is dead. He died from cancer. He should have died in a prison cell or with a needle in his arm and a bag over his head, in a state facility somewhere for the death penalty, and instead he finished his days playing golf in Las Vegas, well before he lost his battle with cancer, playing golf in Las Vegas, partying, taking selfies with a very obtuse people who seem to think that OJ was still some celebrity worth talking to. The whole situation of OJ Simpson's verdict, what he did the case, it is grotesque, really beyond words. And one thing that I wanted to get to and we discussed this today on the radio show. When the jurors say that they did this they found OJ not guilty as a payback for Rodney King. I just want to know how much of a white guilt human sacrifice would be sufficient? Was it really just the two? Based on what? Why not? More? Why not say that it should be one hundred people who are murdered for no reason other than their skin color and a sense among some in society that racial injustice justified their murder because society is so racist. It's really thinking along the lines of societies that do human sacrifice. You know, oh, will kill these people because that will make certain gods happier with us. It is the most irredeemably awful and immoral thing to do in the name of justice. I mean to say that somebody should be allowed to murder people because you don't like what other things have happened in history. This would destroy society in its entirety over time. I mean, race politics is poison. It is pure poison, because you can never make it go away if you adapt the theory. Unfortunately, the Democrat Party has done this, and this is true of the left in America today across the board. If you take the approach that historical wrongs can be righted by doing wrong today, by harming innocent parties innocent people today, you have destroyed the foundational concepts of morality, which individual responsibility, individual culpability, and there's no end to it, right, it just turns into whatever the whims of the mob may be. The mob is angry, so people have to die, and people have to die because of racial injustice. And if those people who die happen to be white in the case of the OJ trial, well then that's just too bad for them. It's horrifying to see some of the voices out there who still try to pretend that there was anything other than a horrific miscarriage of justice from the OJ Simpson trial. And this is showing, I think a lot of people the moral rock that is at the heart of the Democrat left when it comes to race issues. OJ Simpson nearly decapitated two people. One of them was the mother of his children. The other was a completely innocent bystander who just happened to be in the very wrong place at the wrong time. I still to this day think that one of the most important sequences in the People Versus O. J. Simpson show that was on back in twenty sixteen on FX very good series, Very Well Done, was when Ron Goldman's father in the show played by an actor, but Ron Goldman's father starts just completely has a breakdown in front of Marshall Clark the prosecutors, saying, you know, my son is murdered here it's all about OJ and his wife and the politics and race and all this other stuff. He's like, my son was just murdered by a man for no reason other than he was just there and where and they're treating him like an afterthought. You know, where's the justice for my son? I mean, I honestly I got choked up watching that scene. I mean, I can't imagine what the Goldman family went through with all of this, and of course Nicole Brown's family too. But there was a focus at least on OJ killing his wife, the fact that he killed this other person, another white guy or another white person, and it was always this like afterthought, as though it wasn't as big of a deal in the press at least. And that's a that's appalling. It is appalling the OJ verdict. Any any voices that you've heard who have ever cheered for it should be ashamed of themselves. The jurors who acquitted O. J. Simpson, their decision should live in infamy. Uh. They are moral failures and they did something that was atrocious. The narrative that was pushed by some that this was about like la PD racism or whatever is an absolute garbage, as we all know, and it's just a it's a reminder of the same mentality it's in BLM and all this. Oh the cops are so racist and law enforcement is racist and destroy society. Every person is responsible for their conduct, and every person has to be held to account for their conduct. And there should be no excuses made for anyone because of something that happened, whether it's two hundred years ago or you know, two days ago, if it didn't involve anybody who is at issue. What happens elsewhere in society is not at issue in a trial where a man murders his ex wife and a bystander, and it was it was a wake up call, I think in American society, a wake up call for the poison of race politics and just the depths of the victim mentality in some segments of our society that anybody could think that this was a makeup call, makeup call for what what does that mean? As I've said, why stop there, why not say that we needed, we need to have a hundred people murdered, one hundred white people murdered in order to start to make up for the sin of racism in the society. Would say, well, that's obviously monstrous. Yeah, what OJ did is monstrous, but they were willing to justify that. They're willing to say, oh, well, you know that's the that's the price we had to pay as a society. That blood price was acceptable. It's disgusting, disgusting. So I feel very strongly about this, and I'll tell you it was a reminder for me. This played into my I was thirteen years old when the verdict came down, and I remember thinking, everybody who was in favor of this, I that's the Those are the bad guys. Everybody who was in favor of the acquittal, everybody who and it made excuses, Oh you know, if it does not fit, you must have quit. I mean they they were on the wrong side of this equation morally. And everybody who wanted a guilty verdict and saw this for what it was, they were on the right side of the equation. And it's largely broke down along partisan lines. So I think in my formation as a conservative and as a Republican, this played a role in my thinking. To be sure, I don't care about any historical inequity. If a if a black man was killed, if an Asian man or you know, woman was killed hispanic, if they were killed unjustly, if they were murdered, I would want their murderer to be punished. It doesn't matter what their race, the murderer's race is, what the history that you can tie to the country, no, no, no, or or what the police department has done in the past, I don't care. I wouldn't care about any of that because it is morally irrelevant. So it's a it's a point of clarity here as we honestly take a moment to uh to speak ill of the dead, because OJ deserves to be spoken ill of. OJ deserves to have his have his memory spoken of in this way, because this is who he never never took, never took the responsibility for his actions. He was a criminal, He was a malignant, narcissist, a disgraceful. He was given so much by the way, so many god given gifts and his amazing football talents, so rich, so famous, so beloved. A monster, A monster. So that's how I feel about that, And also monstrous. The Washington Post's headline on a police involved shooting. Speaking of race politics in this country, we'll get to that in a second. I'll talk to you about gold for a moment. Here. More Americans are buying now than at any time previously. Some are even trying to buy it at big box stores like Costco. That's right, they're buying gold at Costco, my friends. The price of gold has gone up some thirteen percent recently. Price and value gold is directly connected to world events, has only grown in value over time. It's why I have gold as part of my financial plan. I rely on the Oxford Gold Group for my gold and precious metal purchases. Nobody can predict the future, but we can prepare for it. The Oxford Gold Group, they are real pros at this. They make owning gold and silver simple and easy to understand. Call the Oxford Gold Group right now. You may qualify for up to ten thousand dollars in free precious metals. Call eight three three nine nine five gold. That's three g LD eight three three gold. So here's the Washington Post headline, and I think everybody sees exactly what's going on here. Police fire ninety six shots in forty one seconds, killing black man during traffic stop. This just happened, and you see that headline and you say to yourself, hold on a second, is this a case of racist police officers? Because that's what it sounds, That's what the headlines meant. They fired so many bullets at a traffic stop. Why would that be necessary? Well, maybe maybe it is because this happened last month. The bodycam footage is out dexter read pull this gun and shot at cops eleven times? Is there a more clear cut instance of using lethal force as a law enforcement officer them when someone draws a gun and is firing at you. I would want to know what does the Washington Post here? This writer is Jennifer Hassan at the Washington Post. Why did she construct her headline this way? Why did she leave out that the individual shot at cops they were returning fire. It's on video. There is no doubt to the authenticity of the video. It is very clear. Everyone agrees it is real. The facts are not in dispute here. So why do this? Well, it's malicious. It is meant to scratch at and reopen racial wounds and racial grievance in this country. And I don't think it's at all a coincidence that this is happening at a time of Democrats lagging in the polls, Joe Biden looking really weak going into his re election effort, and they would like BLM three point zero if they can. They would like a mobilization of the black community around a lie of police violence. That is what they are going for here. They want to tell people something that is untrue, to get them very upset, to create the circumstances for riots in the streets. People these kinds of headlines of Washington Post is written here. People will die because of this. If there are riots and buildings are burned down, people will lose their businesses. Cops will be assaulted. There'll be people that are severe, you know, go to the hospital severely injured because of this. And that is what the Democrats want because they think we deserve that as a country. Imagine you're imagine you're one of these police officers and you had to use lethal force against this person who tried to murder cops. I mean, as you're firing at close range your handgun on a police officers, you're attempting murder. This guy dexter read attempted murder of police and he died. He was shot because of it. The cops did the right thing, they did the just and moral and lawful thing. And there there's all this attempt to create this. Oh why for a traffic stop? I don't know. Why did he pull a gun and start shooting at police officers? That's the only question we really need to answer, and or that they should really want to answer. And there is no answer to it because the guy's dead because he pulled the gun and shot a police officer. So what else do we have to know? This is a but I mean, however disgusting and disgraceful you think the Washington Post is. It's not. It's not disgraceful enough. I'll give you some more thoughts, and I think where all this is going here in just a moment. But I gotta tell you, I'm drinking Crockett Coffee right now, which is my coffee brand as in Clay and I started this along with my brother Mason. We have launched a great American coffee brand. We absolutely love it. I drink it all the time. I'm drinking it right now. It is delicious, and I hope you'll subscribe, and I hope you subscribe and get a bunch of it, meaning Italy sixty dollars worth, because then the shipping is free. Coffee is good for months, and so get four backs that'll get you about sixty dollars even better subscribe than you get fifteen percent off. Overall, this should be your coffee. It is absolutely delicious. We found the best coffee we possibly could, and it took months and months, we did taste tests. I'm a coffee drinker, so I really want to You'll see it's delicious coffee. That was point one on this. But also we want to build Crockett, as in the spirit of Davy Crockett, into a brand that represents America, a celebration of history, the frontier and pioneer spirit. Coffee is just the first product we're doing. We want to do other products as well. We want to build a company that reflects our values and our vision of America, and we also want it to be something that is an advertiser on other shows like this one, that share our values and that will never back away from shows because of politics. Oh my gosh, we're scared too many of these companies build themselves, build their name in the conservative media space, and then they get big, they start making real money, and they say, oh, we don't want the headache of supporting conservative content creators anymore. We don't want to be on their shows anymore. We will never do that. We will always stay on the mission, great products for you at great prices, great coffee in this case, and supporting our causes including Tunulta Towers Foundation, which we have partnered with as well at Crocket Coffee. So we're doing good with this money in a whole range of ways and with the sales of this coffee. So go to Crocketcoffee dot com, please subscribe today. That's Crocket Coffee, Crocketcoffee dot com. You know, I think we're starting to see a little bit of the desperation of the Democrats on the Biding issue because they need some kind of a why to reelect Biden. Obviously, abortion is going to play a big role in this. Abortion is going to play a big role in the Democrat effort to get Joe Biden elected. But also they need the Black vote to come out ninety percent plus in favor of Joe Biden. As they generally do in presidential elections, and so they can't speak to Joe Biden delivering for the black community because he hasn't and they know that it's particularly younger black male voters. No, Joe Biden has not delivered for them. Black female voters are still very solidly in the Democrat camp. But black, younger black mail voters I think are winnable for Republicans, which is great, and we would welcome as many of them as they're possibly willing to come and vote Republican. That would be fantastic. I hope that this is you know, we get our hopes up on the right a lot about getting more of the black vote. As conservatives, we want more of the black vote. Has not happened really in recent elections, and it's a continuing disappointment, I think when we get our hopes up for it. But it would be great if it started to happen this time around. But I don't think it's possible for someone like Joe Biden, or the Washington Post's newsroom or so many others to say they love the country and then to present this case of this shooting in Chicago as anything other than a justified use of force by law enforcement. I don't see because if you lie to people and say that it wasn't justified, you are trying to tear the country apart. And that is absolutely what democrats are doing with this. That is that is their intent, all right. You know here on the podcast, I cut through the noise, the nonsense, the ulterior motives. Obviously it's a central mission here. My friend Mark Jakin, my colleague Mark Chakin, he does the same thing for the US stock market. That's right. When it comes to investments, he cuts through the bs. Mark worked on Wall Street for fifty years, and across those decades he invented three new indices for Nasdaq and has predicted some of the biggest market ships of the past decade, including the recent mania in AI stocks. Mark says the majority of Americans are about to miss out on a critical turning point in this AI frenzy. He's calling this a new dawn for US stocks and predicts dozens of specific companies will be impacted in just the next ninety days. So my Mark has agreed to share it one of his favorite AI stocks with you now for free. All you have to do is go to twenty twenty four aistock dot com. That's twenty twenty four aistock dot com paid for by chackin analytics. All right, Geen, that's the buck brief for today. If you're listening on audio, please subscribe. We're almost at enough YouTube subscribers that we reach the official and monetization phase. I think we needed like one hundred more or something. This is maybe the fifth YouTube channel I've had to launch over the year because they always shut me down. Let's just keep it going. I'd love for more of you to watch on the video, so please subscribe. Type in buck brief when you go to YouTube if you're listening on audio, also on Rumble buck brief to check us out there. And yes, there we have it. Shield time
You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Let make sure you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome to the Buck Brief. Let's talk about the death of OJ Simpson and race politics in America, the legacy of the OJ verdict, all of that on today's show. So as we know, OJ Simpson is dead. He died from cancer. He should have died in a prison cell or with a needle in his arm and a bag over his head, in a state facility somewhere for the death penalty, and instead he finished his days playing golf in Las Vegas, well before he lost his battle with cancer, playing golf in Las Vegas, partying, taking selfies with a very obtuse people who seem to think that OJ was still some celebrity worth talking to. The whole situation of OJ Simpson's verdict, what he did the case, it is grotesque, really beyond words. And one thing that I wanted to get to and we discussed this today on the radio show. When the jurors say that they did this they found OJ not guilty as a payback for Rodney King. I just want to know how much of a white guilt human sacrifice would be sufficient? Was it really just the two? Based on what? Why not? More? Why not say that it should be one hundred people who are murdered for no reason other than their skin color and a sense among some in society that racial injustice justified their murder because society is so racist. It's really thinking along the lines of societies that do human sacrifice. You know, oh, will kill these people because that will make certain gods happier with us. It is the most irredeemably awful and immoral thing to do in the name of justice. I mean to say that somebody should be allowed to murder people because you don't like what other things have happened in history. This would destroy society in its entirety over time. I mean, race politics is poison. It is pure poison, because you can never make it go away if you adapt the theory. Unfortunately, the Democrat Party has done this, and this is true of the left in America today across the board. If you take the approach that historical wrongs can be righted by doing wrong today, by harming innocent parties innocent people today, you have destroyed the foundational concepts of morality, which individual responsibility, individual culpability, and there's no end to it, right, it just turns into whatever the whims of the mob may be. The mob is angry, so people have to die, and people have to die because of racial injustice. And if those people who die happen to be white in the case of the OJ trial, well then that's just too bad for them. It's horrifying to see some of the voices out there who still try to pretend that there was anything other than a horrific miscarriage of justice from the OJ Simpson trial. And this is showing, I think a lot of people the moral rock that is at the heart of the Democrat left when it comes to race issues. OJ Simpson nearly decapitated two people. One of them was the mother of his children. The other was a completely innocent bystander who just happened to be in the very wrong place at the wrong time. I still to this day think that one of the most important sequences in the People Versus O. J. Simpson show that was on back in twenty sixteen on FX very good series, Very Well Done, was when Ron Goldman's father in the show played by an actor, but Ron Goldman's father starts just completely has a breakdown in front of Marshall Clark the prosecutors, saying, you know, my son is murdered here it's all about OJ and his wife and the politics and race and all this other stuff. He's like, my son was just murdered by a man for no reason other than he was just there and where and they're treating him like an afterthought. You know, where's the justice for my son? I mean, I honestly I got choked up watching that scene. I mean, I can't imagine what the Goldman family went through with all of this, and of course Nicole Brown's family too. But there was a focus at least on OJ killing his wife, the fact that he killed this other person, another white guy or another white person, and it was always this like afterthought, as though it wasn't as big of a deal in the press at least. And that's a that's appalling. It is appalling the OJ verdict. Any any voices that you've heard who have ever cheered for it should be ashamed of themselves. The jurors who acquitted O. J. Simpson, their decision should live in infamy. Uh. They are moral failures and they did something that was atrocious. The narrative that was pushed by some that this was about like la PD racism or whatever is an absolute garbage, as we all know, and it's just a it's a reminder of the same mentality it's in BLM and all this. Oh the cops are so racist and law enforcement is racist and destroy society. Every person is responsible for their conduct, and every person has to be held to account for their conduct. And there should be no excuses made for anyone because of something that happened, whether it's two hundred years ago or you know, two days ago, if it didn't involve anybody who is at issue. What happens elsewhere in society is not at issue in a trial where a man murders his ex wife and a bystander, and it was it was a wake up call, I think in American society, a wake up call for the poison of race politics and just the depths of the victim mentality in some segments of our society that anybody could think that this was a makeup call, makeup call for what what does that mean? As I've said, why stop there, why not say that we needed, we need to have a hundred people murdered, one hundred white people murdered in order to start to make up for the sin of racism in the society. Would say, well, that's obviously monstrous. Yeah, what OJ did is monstrous, but they were willing to justify that. They're willing to say, oh, well, you know that's the that's the price we had to pay as a society. That blood price was acceptable. It's disgusting, disgusting. So I feel very strongly about this, and I'll tell you it was a reminder for me. This played into my I was thirteen years old when the verdict came down, and I remember thinking, everybody who was in favor of this, I that's the Those are the bad guys. Everybody who was in favor of the acquittal, everybody who and it made excuses, Oh you know, if it does not fit, you must have quit. I mean they they were on the wrong side of this equation morally. And everybody who wanted a guilty verdict and saw this for what it was, they were on the right side of the equation. And it's largely broke down along partisan lines. So I think in my formation as a conservative and as a Republican, this played a role in my thinking. To be sure, I don't care about any historical inequity. If a if a black man was killed, if an Asian man or you know, woman was killed hispanic, if they were killed unjustly, if they were murdered, I would want their murderer to be punished. It doesn't matter what their race, the murderer's race is, what the history that you can tie to the country, no, no, no, or or what the police department has done in the past, I don't care. I wouldn't care about any of that because it is morally irrelevant. So it's a it's a point of clarity here as we honestly take a moment to uh to speak ill of the dead, because OJ deserves to be spoken ill of. OJ deserves to have his have his memory spoken of in this way, because this is who he never never took, never took the responsibility for his actions. He was a criminal, He was a malignant, narcissist, a disgraceful. He was given so much by the way, so many god given gifts and his amazing football talents, so rich, so famous, so beloved. A monster, A monster. So that's how I feel about that, And also monstrous. The Washington Post's headline on a police involved shooting. Speaking of race politics in this country, we'll get to that in a second. I'll talk to you about gold for a moment. Here. More Americans are buying now than at any time previously. Some are even trying to buy it at big box stores like Costco. That's right, they're buying gold at Costco, my friends. The price of gold has gone up some thirteen percent recently. Price and value gold is directly connected to world events, has only grown in value over time. It's why I have gold as part of my financial plan. I rely on the Oxford Gold Group for my gold and precious metal purchases. Nobody can predict the future, but we can prepare for it. The Oxford Gold Group, they are real pros at this. They make owning gold and silver simple and easy to understand. Call the Oxford Gold Group right now. You may qualify for up to ten thousand dollars in free precious metals. Call eight three three nine nine five gold. That's three g LD eight three three gold. So here's the Washington Post headline, and I think everybody sees exactly what's going on here. Police fire ninety six shots in forty one seconds, killing black man during traffic stop. This just happened, and you see that headline and you say to yourself, hold on a second, is this a case of racist police officers? Because that's what it sounds, That's what the headlines meant. They fired so many bullets at a traffic stop. Why would that be necessary? Well, maybe maybe it is because this happened last month. The bodycam footage is out dexter read pull this gun and shot at cops eleven times? Is there a more clear cut instance of using lethal force as a law enforcement officer them when someone draws a gun and is firing at you. I would want to know what does the Washington Post here? This writer is Jennifer Hassan at the Washington Post. Why did she construct her headline this way? Why did she leave out that the individual shot at cops they were returning fire. It's on video. There is no doubt to the authenticity of the video. It is very clear. Everyone agrees it is real. The facts are not in dispute here. So why do this? Well, it's malicious. It is meant to scratch at and reopen racial wounds and racial grievance in this country. And I don't think it's at all a coincidence that this is happening at a time of Democrats lagging in the polls, Joe Biden looking really weak going into his re election effort, and they would like BLM three point zero if they can. They would like a mobilization of the black community around a lie of police violence. That is what they are going for here. They want to tell people something that is untrue, to get them very upset, to create the circumstances for riots in the streets. People these kinds of headlines of Washington Post is written here. People will die because of this. If there are riots and buildings are burned down, people will lose their businesses. Cops will be assaulted. There'll be people that are severe, you know, go to the hospital severely injured because of this. And that is what the Democrats want because they think we deserve that as a country. Imagine you're imagine you're one of these police officers and you had to use lethal force against this person who tried to murder cops. I mean, as you're firing at close range your handgun on a police officers, you're attempting murder. This guy dexter read attempted murder of police and he died. He was shot because of it. The cops did the right thing, they did the just and moral and lawful thing. And there there's all this attempt to create this. Oh why for a traffic stop? I don't know. Why did he pull a gun and start shooting at police officers? That's the only question we really need to answer, and or that they should really want to answer. And there is no answer to it because the guy's dead because he pulled the gun and shot a police officer. So what else do we have to know? This is a but I mean, however disgusting and disgraceful you think the Washington Post is. It's not. It's not disgraceful enough. I'll give you some more thoughts, and I think where all this is going here in just a moment. But I gotta tell you, I'm drinking Crockett Coffee right now, which is my coffee brand as in Clay and I started this along with my brother Mason. We have launched a great American coffee brand. We absolutely love it. I drink it all the time. I'm drinking it right now. It is delicious, and I hope you'll subscribe, and I hope you subscribe and get a bunch of it, meaning Italy sixty dollars worth, because then the shipping is free. Coffee is good for months, and so get four backs that'll get you about sixty dollars even better subscribe than you get fifteen percent off. Overall, this should be your coffee. It is absolutely delicious. We found the best coffee we possibly could, and it took months and months, we did taste tests. I'm a coffee drinker, so I really want to You'll see it's delicious coffee. That was point one on this. But also we want to build Crockett, as in the spirit of Davy Crockett, into a brand that represents America, a celebration of history, the frontier and pioneer spirit. Coffee is just the first product we're doing. We want to do other products as well. We want to build a company that reflects our values and our vision of America, and we also want it to be something that is an advertiser on other shows like this one, that share our values and that will never back away from shows because of politics. Oh my gosh, we're scared too many of these companies build themselves, build their name in the conservative media space, and then they get big, they start making real money, and they say, oh, we don't want the headache of supporting conservative content creators anymore. We don't want to be on their shows anymore. We will never do that. We will always stay on the mission, great products for you at great prices, great coffee in this case, and supporting our causes including Tunulta Towers Foundation, which we have partnered with as well at Crocket Coffee. So we're doing good with this money in a whole range of ways and with the sales of this coffee. So go to Crocketcoffee dot com, please subscribe today. That's Crocket Coffee, Crocketcoffee dot com. You know, I think we're starting to see a little bit of the desperation of the Democrats on the Biding issue because they need some kind of a why to reelect Biden. Obviously, abortion is going to play a big role in this. Abortion is going to play a big role in the Democrat effort to get Joe Biden elected. But also they need the Black vote to come out ninety percent plus in favor of Joe Biden. As they generally do in presidential elections, and so they can't speak to Joe Biden delivering for the black community because he hasn't and they know that it's particularly younger black male voters. No, Joe Biden has not delivered for them. Black female voters are still very solidly in the Democrat camp. But black, younger black mail voters I think are winnable for Republicans, which is great, and we would welcome as many of them as they're possibly willing to come and vote Republican. That would be fantastic. I hope that this is you know, we get our hopes up on the right a lot about getting more of the black vote. As conservatives, we want more of the black vote. Has not happened really in recent elections, and it's a continuing disappointment, I think when we get our hopes up for it. But it would be great if it started to happen this time around. But I don't think it's possible for someone like Joe Biden, or the Washington Post's newsroom or so many others to say they love the country and then to present this case of this shooting in Chicago as anything other than a justified use of force by law enforcement. I don't see because if you lie to people and say that it wasn't justified, you are trying to tear the country apart. And that is absolutely what democrats are doing with this. That is that is their intent, all right. You know here on the podcast, I cut through the noise, the nonsense, the ulterior motives. Obviously it's a central mission here. My friend Mark Jakin, my colleague Mark Chakin, he does the same thing for the US stock market. That's right. When it comes to investments, he cuts through the bs. Mark worked on Wall Street for fifty years, and across those decades he invented three new indices for Nasdaq and has predicted some of the biggest market ships of the past decade, including the recent mania in AI stocks. Mark says the majority of Americans are about to miss out on a critical turning point in this AI frenzy. He's calling this a new dawn for US stocks and predicts dozens of specific companies will be impacted in just the next ninety days. So my Mark has agreed to share it one of his favorite AI stocks with you now for free. All you have to do is go to twenty twenty four aistock dot com. That's twenty twenty four aistock dot com paid for by chackin analytics. All right, Geen, that's the buck brief for today. If you're listening on audio, please subscribe. We're almost at enough YouTube subscribers that we reach the official and monetization phase. I think we needed like one hundred more or something. This is maybe the fifth YouTube channel I've had to launch over the year because they always shut me down. Let's just keep it going. I'd love for more of you to watch on the video, so please subscribe. Type in buck brief when you go to YouTube if you're listening on audio, also on Rumble buck brief to check us out there. And yes, there we have it. Shield time