Quantum Computing - Best of Coast to Coast AM - 3/27/25

Published Mar 28, 2025, 9:47 AM

George Noory and author Nick Begich discuss the continued advancement in quantum supercomputers and whether America is keeping up with other countries, plus the latest developments in government weather manipulation projects, energy weapons and the importance of protecting the nation's power grid.

Now here's a highlight from Coast to Coast AM on iHeartRadio.

Man, welcome back to Coast to Coast. George Nori with you, Nick Beggot's with us. Nick, Let's get back into the quantum computing. Where are we as a nation competitively in the computer world.

Well, I, you know, this is probably one of the most important areas. I think we're right up there with the best of the best. You know, the thing about quantum computing again is you know what does that really mean in terms of computing power? And you can take the biggest computers on the world. And when I first looked at this, it's been now almost fifteen eighteen years ago. At that time, it would take a trillion years of a supercomputer to do what a quantum computer can do in an hour.

Wow.

And when you start to think about this kind of elap whoever gets there first, there won't be any encryption, any code that you can secure your computer with that amount of computing power is just incomprehensible.

When you hook that into AI and a few other things.

In terms of technology, this changes everything about everything. This is being pursued vigorously by every industrialized country in the world. And again, whoever gets there first presents the biggest challenge to everyone else. And again, I know that it's a priority for our country, it's priority for every country that has a technology base. China, Russia, Israel, the US, Great Britain, France, Germany, I mean, all of the big powers. Japan, you know, are looking at this in a vigorous way. Scientus from around the world are and they're going to make the necessary breakthroughs. There's no doubt about it, and some even suggest that that has already happened.

Well, we started talking with you, we talked about HARP in the last It's now under the control of the university, isn't that.

Yes, it is, and you know it's transitioned from a Navy project to a DARPA project to a private project. Yeah, it's privately operated now in Alaska. They do work for various government agencies and private institutions. So yes, it's still operating. Yes it's still out there, but again it's kind of been embedded in the university system. Creates a lot less controversy for them. And I think that the big things that military was trying to extract in terms of knowledge were gained and they've moved on, and I think more people have looked at this. You know, when Gene Manning and I wrote Angels Don't Play This Harp and published the first editions of that back in the early nineties. Even today, you know, all these years later, we see fresh reports coming out by other research essentially confirming what we had said many many years ago. And I have not changed my position on what it was originally intended for in our initial research. We stand by it, and it was extremely well document In fact, it was coast to coast in Art bellback and I believe it was ninety four. It was our first major radio show on the subject, and Art replayed that four times that month because it got so much attention, and those were the days we did long play. I think it was either a four it might have even been a five hour show, but it set the tone. And now you hear a whole lot about the things that we had talked about, particularly in the area of weather modification as it relates to what humans can do, and heart was one of those technologies that we pointed out had those kinds of capabilities.

Meteorologists are predicting that the hurricane its season this year could be one of the worst. Are we contributing to that?

I think it's a little bit of each, all right.

I think that now we've also seen in the last twenty years media reports about other countries China, Russia and others playing with the idea of weather modification, actually testing their technologies. The thing that people need to recognize is that when you start messing with these systems and their energetic systems, you change things. And in physics, the concept of the butterfly effect, where a small thing in one end of the planet can create a hurricane on the other flapping of a butterfly's wings, for the example. When you talk about these kinds of tools to affect weather in one area, it's not isolated, it has everything is connected in a profound way, and it has an effect human beings. There was an experiment done actually, and it was I'm trying to remember the name, but you probably will when I started talking about but they had set up these random computers around the world to try and see what the consciousness of human beings were Doingerators, right, And then they found out that human consciousness actually does influence, or it appears to influence what's happening within the world. And I'm not talking about smoke coming out of your exhaust pipe. I'm talking about consciousness itself.

And when you look at.

This whole area and some of the best scientists and consciousness. Elizabeth Rauscher was a dear friend of mine, passed away a number of years ago. She had done some seminal work in this area along with a number of others, and published her work Consciousness embeds everything. We are active participants in what happens around us, whether we acknowledge it or not. And I think that's again, as we move forward into this century, more is going to be learned about this, and more is going to be learned.

About the fact that.

Consciousness drives it all and how we're connected to that, I think is going to become increasingly clear, and certainly is a separation within the science is occurring right now. Good scientists from all over the world, the ones I've met, and I've met many most of them have a really deep spiritual nature because as they discover what is in the universe, they discover a little bit perhaps about the maker of the universe.

I've been preaching for years to protect our power grid from electromagnetic pulse e MPs. So far no administration has jumped at it.

This is probably again one of the one of the big important issues. And I know, in fact, you had a really excellent guest a number of years ago who had published a book on the.

Topic, Bill Bill forston Yep.

That's it and uh and you know when you look at the work he's done, the work others had done.

Where did this all begin.

It began with atomic and thermal nuclear detonations in the atmosphere, and it was observed that it knocked out communications for a number of hours. And this is where the thing started in terms of what it is and what it could do. There was actually a patent around HARP and it was one of Ben Easton's patents, and it was not so much dealing with HARP as itself, but it was this idea that you could create an EMP if you could create a big enough energy burst. And so whether it was thermal nuclear above the Earth or some other energy burst, if you could put it a thermal nuclear detonation above the United States or above China, you could knock us back into the Stone Age. I mean, you basically knock out every electromagnetic circuit, these fine circuits that run all of our computers, telephones, everything in the course of that nature also has this ability that some will remember stories about something happened in the eighteen hundreds and it was later dubbed the Carrington effect, and it was a solar flare that was so substantial it created a current that ran through telegraph wires, electrocuting people and creating a huge problem for telegraph operators.

Today.

If we had such an event, we would lose basically the technology that we have, except that was what shielded now. I know from a military perspective, a lot has been done in this area to try and shield the United States from this kind of thing. But something as simple as a couple of car batteries with the right kind of simple technology, you can even buy it at an autopart so or you can create a localized DMP that would cover several blocks. As an example, something like that going off in say New York City in the middle of the financial district would create global chaos. These are small, the technology is flat, meaning it's widely known around the world. These type of technologies are the ones that are the most destructive and yet you don't hear a lot in the mainstream. Electromagnetic pulses, energy weapons as a concept. We started talking about it thirty years ago. As we look at what's happening today, high powered lasers, microwave weapons, all of these technologies have emerged.

Most of them are still classified.

The only time that you see them is in wartime, and you can even I would even suggest that the present situation in the world, both in the Middle East and in Ukraine and Russia, weapons are being tested.

And there used to be a concept during the Cold War.

One of my friends was a colonel and he was a pilot, and they used to use the phrase we would fly into Russian airspace to scare up their defenses, to cause them to use their defenses so they could triangulate radar stations and locate things and know about capability. The Russians do it to us all the time, especially in Alaska. They come into our airspace to see what our defenses are and whether we can react to them. So in war conflicts is where new technologies are tried.

To see what you can do.

Think of what Israel did in the knocking out of or actually blowing up a bunch of cell phones held by hamas amazing.

He is the gateway, It truly is.

It is one of a kind, to be sure. But the EMPs you can protect the grid and forced and predicted it would take about two billion dollars. That's a jump change for us nowadays.

It is.

In fact, it's the price if I think a modern B one bombers somewhere in that neighborhood these days. But again, you know, these are things that need do need to be pursued. I can say this that there's in this administration we may see some of that. I mean, I know that these issues are understood by some some of the people in the Congress and the US Senate, and I would suspect that that they will be part of the dialogue as we move forward, especially as volatile as the world has become. The idea of an artificial MP or a natural MP and being able to protect the nation against those things is critical. If you think about everything that we operate on now, very very few people are self sufficient. I mean, in one hundred years ago, ninety five percent of the people could could self sustain with or without much of technology.

Today that's not true.

Technology shuts down water systems go offline, septic systems go offline, and within forty eight hours chaos breaks out.

So we need to be concerned.

Emp is a natural threat and a man made threat, and also a terrorist threat.

The fact of the matter is.

William Cohen that started to identify geoengineering as terrorists threats, meaning that the technology had flattened out enough to where the less sophisticated, the less technologically oriented governments had the capability of developing these technologies. Nothing's changed except there's more knowledge out there now than there ever was. The nature of information is more widespread and disseminated than it ever was, and genius comes from everywhere. There are smart people in every part of the world. And who the universe touches with intelligence, who God touches with intelligence.

Is everyone and anyone.

And this is what I would say also is people are There's a lot of fear, fear obviously in the world because of so much uncertainty. And what fear does to the mind it shuts down our higher operating system and I were to become more reactionary on an emotional level, but also our higher ordered thinking is suspended when we're in states of fear. Or intense negative emotion. So this puts us in a frame where we can be hearded, pushed, and manipulated much more easily in states of fear. So conquering our own individual fear and with that gaining knowledge suppresses fear a bit. But understanding there's a lot of people that are good people scattered around the world looking for solutions, and I think we're in the age of solutions. Yes, we have the tensions of both extremes. I'm an optimist, I always have been. I think we're going to come out of this better humanity for it. But we're in for some very very difficult times and I think we're just seeing the beginnings of it.

Listen to more Coast to Coast AM every weeknight at one am Eastern, and go to Coast to coastam dot com for more

The Best of Coast to Coast AM

The Best of Coast to Coast AM podcast, hosted by George Noory. A media phenomenon, Coast to Coast AM 
Social links
Follow podcast
Recent clips
Browse 2,381 clip(s)