Smart Talks with IBM and Malcolm Gladwell: Quantum Computing is Tomorrow’s Computing, Today

Published Oct 28, 2021, 10:00 AM

Over the next decade, quantum computing has the potential to revolutionize the way we work and live. In this episode of Smart Talks, Malcolm talks to Dr. Darío Gil, Senior Vice President and Director of IBM Research, about quantum computing and its potential to accelerate discovery and development.

Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

Hello, Hello. This is Smart Talks with IBM, a podcast from Pushkin Industries, High Heart Media and IBM about what it means to look at today's most challenging problems in a new way. I'm Malcolm Gladwell. In this episode, I'll be discussing the capabilities of quantum computing with Dr Dario gil Dr Gill is the senior Vice president and director of IBM Research. He's also recognized globally as one of the brightest minds in the quantum computing industry. But what we know is that is theoretically sound and possible, and that we are making very significant progress towards achieving good goal. And that's why this is a quest of doing something that has never been done before, but it is definitely possible. Earlier this year, at the Wall Street Journals Virtual CIO Network Summit, Dr Gil pro claimed that the next ten years will be the decade in which quantum really comes of age. So what is quantum computing and how will it transform over the next decade and in what ways will quantum computers change the way we interact with technology. Let's dive in. Thanks for joining us. Start to kill. It's a real pleasure thank you for having me, Malcolm, it's a pleasure to be with you. I wanted to start my talent us a little bit about yourself. You did your graduate work at m I T. What did you study there? I studied nanotechnology at m i T. I joined the Nanostructure's laboratory. It was in the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and their professor Hank Smith, who was one of the pioneers of the field of nano fabrication. You know, how do you manipulate and build incredibly small part of our world? And so that sets you up for the world that you're in now. Right this the quantum computing flows naturally out of the idea that this plenty of room at the bottom. Yes, it is because of the different theories of physics. One that is of course extraordinarily irrelevant for the world of the small is quantum physics. So if we are to understand how matter behaves at the atomic scale and electronic structure and the interactions and uh what occurs at the level of materials, you have to understand what is happening in the world of quantum physics. For those who are not from a technical background, can you give us the give me this the simplest definition of what quantum computing is. You know, we're all accustomed to using computers today, and at the foundation of the computers we use every day and our smartphones is the idea of bits or binary digits. And interestingly, this is an idea that the fascination that all the complexity in the world we could reuse it in a mode of communication, which is zeros and ones dates back as far back as Lightnings, but it was really in the twenty century. In the nineteen fourties and fifties, a Cloud Shannon, which is one of the great leaders in the world of computing, told us we could create these incredibly sophisticated modes of communication and computation just by being able to map all the complexity and information in the world to strings of zeros and ones, and computers are machines that manipulate zeros and ones very very efficient. So in quantum computing it actually revisits that idea. It turns out that the most fundamental building block of computation is not the zero on one, not the bit. That's something known as the cubit sure for quantum bit, and at its heart it melts that idea ye of information with the idea of physics. So what quantum computers do is they manipulate information, exploiting the loss of quantum physics to be able to do calculations that are simply impossible to do if you just use the binary digit the zeros and ones. It's a richer way to represent information and manipulate information by exploiting the properties of quantum mechanics to do things are impossible classically. Yeah, would you say you can tackle problems now that would be impossible mechanically. What is that? Could you represent the difference in capacity of these two ways of computing, like how how much of a gap is here between quantum and conventional computer? You know, and it's full potential the gaps it's an exponential So let me let me explain what I mean by that. If you want to simulate nature, so let's say very practical that you want to build a better battery technology for electric cons right, so those are based on lithium chemistry. And if you want to say, build a battery that is longer lasting or safer, contract faster. So now you have in front of your material science problems and what you can do is go through the periodic table and see all the different elements and figure out how you are going to combine them to create the material that has the properties you like. Okay, so how can you go about doing that? Well? One approach is to, uh, do it empirically, just try and humans have been doing that since time me memorial right, combine elements and see hy works. Another methodological approach is if you have a theory of how things work, you could try to solve the problem long form and see if you can have a close form solution to the problem. And a third angle that really came about with the advent of computers is you could simulate it. Right. You could use computers to mimic how atoms behave and use those equation issues and try to do the calculations to see what the properties would be. What's the problem. The problem is that no matter how big computers we use today, the number of variables that we have to compute over is roughly correlated to the number of electrons and electron orbitals present in those elements. So the more sophisticated and material we've gotta make, the more interactions between these electrons we gotta be able to calculate, and that number grows exponentially, you know, pretty soon we need to have a computer, you know, with more components than there are atoms in the universe. Right, so it's impractical. So what do we do. We approximate place, and when we approximate, we don't get the right answer. So we are in this stock loop of rate of progress. What is interesting on quantum is that for modeling those kinds of problems, instead of having an exponential meaning the more electrons we add, you know, the number of calculations blowing up. Now it's a relation that looks more like linear, meaning I only need one more cubit roughly speaking, to model another electron. So even even have a complex molecule where I need you know, dozens or hundreds of of orbital calculations and I need to do I would need a machine with dozens of hundreds of cubits rather than a classical machine with ten trillion transistors. Right that we don't know how to make. It's not an extension or a derivative from the kind of computers that we've been using. It's an entirely new class of computers. That's exactly right, And that is what's so interesting. So there will be classical computing and quantum computing. That's how important this is, right, that you phrased it very nicely, which is not just another evolution. Is we've actually left no element of the assumption of the current information on computational model as sacred. Right, not even the bit has survived the quantum information view of the world. Right, the very foundation had to be revisited. So where are we How close are we having quantum computers? Actually that you you describe that that task kept trying to figure out how to make a better battery. When do you think we'll be able to use quantum computers for a task like that? We already have built quantum computers. Actually, Iban was the first company in the world in two thousand and sixteen to build a small quantum computer and making universally available. So the first part of the answer is like, we already have quantum computers, so you can learn how to program them. You can start mapping problems around how you do it. The challenge we have is that very difficult to build these machines, so we have not yet crossed the path where they can do things that are of practical value that or classical machines cannot. So we gotta keep an eye now of when that crossover is going to happen, and that is something that is this tier of information and computation that would likely happen in the next few years, and then that begins, you know, a whole a whole new space right of opportunity. Yeah, you had said earlier with the stage now where the machines make errors, what's the source of the difficulty at the moment. Yeah, then you can build these machines that have special properties to represent information in unique ways that gives them exponential power compared to classical machines. The massines are subject to errors, but there's both a theory and a way to implement an error correction technique that would allow us to compute in definitely and with like minimum levels of errors. That's that it would be a practical value. But realizing that large scale machine is still a significant journey with a lot of scientific and engineering breakthroughs need to occur. But what we know is that it's theoretically sound and possible, and that we are making very significant progress towards achieving the goal. And that's why this is a quest of doing something that has never been done before, but it is definitely possible. Yeah, you began with the example of the electric battery. Give me another example of a of an industry or a problem which would be well served by using a quantum computer. These three categories that quantum is going to make a difference similar in nature. The world of mathematics, linear algebra that matters to maschine learning and other problems. And the third is world of search and graphs and what you can do with them that matter a great deal. But I want to give an example that's very famous of the consequences of quantum computing, which is some of the implications that it will have for cybersecurity and for security in general. And this came from a very very famous algorithm that gave re energizing of the field of quantum in the ninety nineties called Short's algorithm, and it came from Peter Short, who was then at bad LAPS and now is a professor at m I T. And he published an algorithm that took a problem that has to do with factoring. So basically, the problem is if you take two prime numbers that are say large, and you multiply those two prime numbers together, and you get the product, the final number of the product of those of those two If doing the multiplication, it's very easy to do. Anybody can do it, right. It's just multiplying two numbers. But if I give you the product and I ask you, can you tell me, given this number, what two prime numbers composed? That product turns out to be very, very computationally expensive. And he in his algorithm, he showed that if you had a sufficient in large quantum computer you could do this efficiently. And you say, well, what does that matter, Well, it turns out it matters is because as the basis of how we do encryption today and how we secure all forms of communications and financial systems and everything, where basically your private key is your prime number. Malcome, I would have another private key which is my prime number. Those two numbers are secret, and when we multiply them, that's the public key that we share over the Internet and so on the protocol. Everybody sees our public key, but they cannot calculate or private keys. But if you had a large enough quantum computer, now you could. So there's a big implication that the encryption protocols of the world need to be changed to prevent future quantum computers from decryption. So that's not the fault of quantum computers, but it's an example of the consequences we build all sorts of assumptions in the world about what problems are easy and hard to do mathematically, and uh, and this technology will alter that equation. Yeah. Yeah, But there was something I was thinking about when you were talking. I was imagining the world of clinical trials of a promising new drug, which are now conducted in exactly the same way basically as they were conducted hundred years ago. You put it in people and observe differences between you know, the experimental i'm and a control are. And it's because the task of modeling drugs interaction with very very different human beings is too complicated. This is the kind of thing that down the road we might be able to simulate a drug trial. Yes, some the opportunities of of these advancements is to accelerate discovery, the rate of time from invention to realizing the capability to compress it very significantly, perhaps by a factor of ten x in time or ten x in cost. So um, yeah, you're You're absolutely right, Uh that the only path that we have to improve or expert mental capacity to be able to determine and compress how efficient we can do it is to be more sophisticated as to how much we need to test, and they trade off. The thing that you can balance is if I can compute essentially to do virtual experiments, but to do it with the level of accuracy that is required and the revel of fidelity that we would see in the real world, then it's a net game. And indeed that is going to be you know, one of the main vectors of use cases and applications for quantum computer. I was thinking about the the m R and A COVID vaccines, which were conceived, they developed using the most cutting edge science imaginable, and then tested using the least cut edge science. Right. You went from this dazzling feed of century, you know, genetic biomedicine, and then you painstakingly rounded up people, brought them in, gave them shots, you know, ask them questions, had them fill out fill out four. I mean, it's like and that's also an example of this. You just you just brought this this thing about what happens when we combine this new technology with existing technologies. In that hypothetical case, that's a combination. You're taking this brand new field of biomedicine and marrying it to a a way of of revolutionizing the clinical aspect of medicine. That's two systems in combination create a kind of exponential change in your outcome. Yeah, and and and that's the part that we always struggle as humans, right because since you know, time progresses linearly for us, the fact that there's these exponentials in the form of technology is an example. But we've also seen exponentials. I think people are understanding a little bit better, uh, you know, tragically in this case the power of exponentials in the context of a pandemic. But the fact that these exponentials are present in our in our world and our universe, and that through technology you get these combinations of technology that allows you to create them. It's something that is both the source of massive opportunity and aspects that have to do with with with governance of how we need to be smart enough to be able to guide them properly. But you're right, I mean, that's a good example where you brought up in terms of an experimental capability of m R n A and UH and and interestingly enough, the sort of more theoretical unification or some of these ideas is that MR and A technology is again rooting on the idea that biology is information and and that if we're able to in this case UH the code like in this case involves in the genetic sequencing of the virus and from there figure out what parts of the code I need to bring back into your immune system to be able to find it efficiently in a ways about being able to read information, process information, send it back to you and you yourself are are the computer right with this new program to deal with the biology of it, So bringing information on that and how efficiently we computed, you know, how you conduct clinical trials. All of that aspect of it is is the opportunity to have more mastery overall environments. Can you ask a personal question if you look over the history of technology, every now and again, there are people who are in these magical moments where they are aware that the thing they're working on is going to dramatically transform the world I live in. You can imagine someone working in Edison's lab or someone working in the Manhattan project in the desert in you know, in or you know that we can all identify you're in that position. You know, I believe that to my core, and I indeed like I feel that way, and the team feels this way. That we have assembled a team that is a fine esteem in the world that it is designing and imagining and creating these quantum computers. And there's not a doubt in our mind that as difficult as this quest is, it has that potential. It's one of those things that it answers the equation of what is possible to do with technology. It is one of these things that will be definitely in the history books in terms of information and computation and what it means. And I think that that brings us an enormous amount of energy into us, right because when we come to work every day and when we see the progress we're making, is this feeling of being absolutely at the cutting edge where every day that the team makes progress is the actual boundary of knowledge and possibilities in the field. And it just feels magical, right, And both our successes and the challenges as as we push forward, you know, are colored by this this passion of saying boy, but this is this is a frontier of human and uh, you know, and we're all working together to uh you know, do it as well as we know how to. Let's explore this idea, the potential of combining these different computing forms. Give me some more practical examples of what combinations look like if we're gonna put them in the proper context. What's happening with technologies like quantum and AI. I'd like to say that they need to fit in the context of a method. And the method that we're most passionate about, it's not a new one, is the scientific method. Or thesis is that we should expand the reach of the scientific method, and for the most important problems that we're confronting. Let's take global warming or fighting pandemics. Accelerating the right of discovery is incredibly important right this aspect of time. So here's the question, how can this advances in computing accelerate the scientific method? So let's peel the layer. What is behind the scientific method? If we look at it very very simply, we would say is the act of learning from the past. So you gotta you know, know and exploit the knowledge that has been accumulated that is typically in the form of documents, uh, books, etcetera. You need to then be able to generate hypothesis that can be verified or nullified. You've gotta conduct experiments and then you gotta share it with a community for feedback and go through the loop again. You say, well, how can these technologies help you? Take the first one to search and learn from the past. So AI in the form of natural language processing, in the form of being able to process documents and build huge graphs with which to search knowledge that already existed. It's greatly helping us. I mean we we live it in a day to day life by you know, like the power of search right of information the web. But as as scientists, you can do this if you can greatly enhance the ability to read scientific literature and see its connections and help you as a scientist acquire information fast. So that's a use of AI for the search. Then you go the next step generate a hypothesis. Well, to generate hypothesis, there's a beautiful new area in and I called generative models. We may be a little bit more familiar with the use of neural networks in SATURAI to do the task of classification. Right. If I give you images, you give me labels. Right, I said, well, this is a yellow car, a red car, and so on, and it gets done with an all network. Perhaps people are less familiar with using now some of these new networks to do generation in terms of classification. So I give you you know, I say, hey, designed to me a chair that looks like an avocado, right, and the system can automatically give you hundreds of thousands of different designs and so on. Right. So, so now you can use this generative capability to imagine new molecules back to connect it to our idea about chemistry and lithium chemistries that have these properties. I want give me molecules that may fit that criteria. And if I have an eye that creates these generative models, I want to verify whether they may work as they want. So now I can use a quantum computer right in the future to say do they work like they like? They say, because I'm simbulating a model of of chemistry is now and combining AI and quantum and simulation to be able to do this better. Then the next step says, well, let's realize it in practice. Let's do experimentation now, so I can have robots that synthesized with chemistry that are AI guided to optimally create the synthetic round, and the programming steps with which to create the molecules and so on. So I like to think about it is take a method that we know works, the scientific method, think about it as a method, and now ask yourself how the loop of technologies that we're creating can enhance it and improve it in concert with scientists and humans. And that is what I think is going to have revolutionary potential because I'm I'm closed with the idea of what a difference it made you brought up m r n A, What a difference it made to have the tools available to us to compress the time to discovery from the average time of fourteen years for a vaccine to under one. And think of the implications that happen well in future pandemics, in in climate change. How are we going to compress a time to discovery? And and that's going to be the power of the scientific methods supercharged with computing, including quantum and act mm HM. When I ask a question, it sounds like it is impossible to be a pessimist and work on quantum computing. I like that so so uh probably true, you know, because when you have so many challenges and uh and so many difficulty it takes a particular type of people to have the courage to be able to overcome them. But it gets combined when when you know that the theory is very sound and correct, the fact that we haven't been able to realize the technology that allows that theory to be expressed is in itself a source of energy, right And indeed, like you, you cannot be, you know, a pessimist if you want to be at the banguard of the creation of this technology. And also the implications of it are so profound for some of the most fundamental problems that that that is another source of optimism required for the technology. Yeah, this has been so fascinating. Thank you so much. I've really enjoyed this, Dr Gil, Thank you so much. Thank you again to Dr Dario Gil for his insights about the future of quantum computing. It will be fascinating see how the conversions of old and new can revolutionize the way we live and communicate. Smart Talks with IBM is produced by Emily Rostack with Carlie Migliori and Katherine Girrado, edited by Karen shakerge engineering by Martin Gonzalez, mixed and mastered by Jason Gambrel. Music by Gramsco. Special thanks to Molly Sosha, Andy Kelly Mia Label, Jacob Weisberg had a Fane, Eric Sandler and Maggie Taylor, and the teams at eight Bar and IBM. Smart Talks with IBM is a production of Pushkin Industries and I Heart Media. You can find more episodes at IBM dot com slash smart Talks. You'll find more Pushkin podcasts on the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you like to listen. I'm Malcolm Gladwell, See you next time. The Beginning

In 1 playlist(s)

  1. TechStuff

    2,435 clip(s)

TechStuff

TechStuff is getting a system update. Everything you love about TechStuff now twice the bandwidth wi 
Social links
Follow podcast
Recent clips
Browse 2,432 clip(s)