The Luddites: Misunderstood Working Class Heroes

Published Aug 22, 2024, 9:00 AM

Today we think of Luddites as people who don’t know how to use technology or are maybe even afraid of it. That’s pretty far from what the original Luddites were all about. They were the first workers to fight for fair treatment. They were not successful.

Welcome to Stuff you should know, a production of iHeartRadio.

Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh and there's Chuck and Jerry's here tooon. We're about to break our computers just to get in the mood for this episode.

Good job, my friend.

Do you think so, because a lot of the times you say like, oh, that was great, or way to go or something like that, and I'm like, that was not that good. And that's a good example of that.

No, I don't mean that joke. I mean the the article you put together, just like the old days.

Oh good, okay, good. So it's clear you're not gaslighting me about my jokes being good.

Now, this article is great, the joke was mid Let's do it.

All right, let's do it. So we're talking about light heightes, and I think just about everybody in the English speaking world and probably beyond are familiar with the light eights to some degree or not. But just as a little background refresher, the Ludites were a group of textile workers living at the beginning of the nineteenth century in the Midlands in the north of England, which had recently become industrialized, and they didn't like the machines that were the new technology for using for making textiles. So they broke them all. And that's the Luddites. There's nothing more to understand. There's no more nuance to them than that.

Well, yeah, and you know, I think a lot of people may not even know where the name came from and may just think luddite is a word for someone who is afraid of technology or hates technology. It's kind of been co opted as such. But as we will learn, you're being cooi and there is a lot of nuance. And what the Ludites really were were a people that got together, some craftsmen and artisans that got together and were sort of the first workers rights people who very reasonably tried to make workers' rights deals in the face of the industrial revolution and only turned to this after that failed.

Yeah, so this was the first instance of capitalism kind of steamrolling over labor, the only steamrolling steamrolling over Yeah, steam rolling over labor and labor's rights and basically taking care of labor and being equitable and fair and profit sharing the first instance. And so they were the first people to fight against it, and sadly they were the first people to lose that battle. First of many.

Yeah, they were the Bernie Bros. Of the day.

So let's go back way back, not all the way back, let's just go back to twenty twelve, Chuck. Oh, sure, because I like this anecdote.

Yeah, yeah, that was the Summer Olympics that I believe Danny Boyle curated the opening ceremony and all that stuff that year, right.

Yeah, the twenty twelve London Olympics, Summer Olympics, the opening ceremony there was kind of a super brief synopsis of English history.

Yeah, that's what you do. Yeah, it was really great, just like France did, right, exactly.

So there's this moment in the opening ceremonies where the people all move from the countryside to the city, and if I remember correctly, I'm doing this from memory, they were harkened by men in black suits wearing stovetops or stovepipe hats, okay, And what that represented was the beginning of industrialization, like we tend to think of the Industrial Revolution here in America's happening here in America. That was the second one. The first one had taken place one hundred to fifty years before in England, specifically in the north of England and like sounds like Manchester and Liverpool. And the reason that everybody was being called from the countryside to the city figuratively and literally was because that's where the machines are, the new machines that have been perfected using steam power that could automate all sorts of different processes that used to have to be done by hand. They were big, and they were cumbersome, and they were expensive. So rather than people doing stuff in their home anymore, they had to go to where the machines are to do work. Now. That was a radical.

Change, Yeah, a big change, and that same change, you know, we've talked about plenty of times in terms of our American experience here, but like you said, it happened previously in England. Same deal, people from the country moving into the city, steam power running the show. And the first industry over there to kind of get smashed in the face with that new reality was the textile industry. And they're in the Midlands of England. Am I even saying that right because we were about to say a lot of Shires.

I think it's pronounced the Midland. Its spelled Midlands, but it's pronounced Worcestershire.

Right, but all over that area Yorkshire, Derbyshire, Leicester, Lancashire, Nottingham shure hmm, Cheshire.

Yeah, the Cheshire cat.

Okay, did I get all those? Why is Leicester the only one that's not pronouncing.

The sure it is that's Leicestershire.

Oh did I say it wrong to begin with? Then?

No, No, you just left off the shore. And so just a little note because I didn't understand this until I finally just went and looked it up. Like Leicester is the main town, the county seat, if you will, of the larger county of Leicestershire. So when there's a suffix of shire on the end of a town name, that refers to the county and the town is usually the biggest town or the main town in that county.

Finally clear that up. So in those areas, this is where the Texas are artisans and you know there were workers. They were crafts people, trades people. They went through sort of that traditional route where you're an apprentice you learn the craft. They had these robust trade unions and guilds that made sure the quality of the worker was up to snuff, the quality of the product and the materials were all up to snuff, and they had this good deal going with the merchant class up to that point where these wealthy merchants basically funded the operations and then split the profits. They would say, here, we're going to put a loom in your house. These hand looms aren't too huge, it can fit in your barn. We're going to give you some good, high quality materials to spin, and we'll split the profits in a way that works for both of us. And they had a good life. They were like working three or four days a week at home and like, you know, making textiles and earning a good living.

Yeah. So, And there was a quote from a guy named William Gardner who was a stocking maker at the time, which was a huge industry right at the beginning or up until the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, and he said the year was checkered with holidays, wakes, which are festivals held non our patron saints, and fairs. It was not one dull round of labor, and like it was just a much more leisurely life than what was about to come. And the thing that's so gripping about the beginning of the Industrial Revolution and specifically the initial disruption in the textile industry is that it happened overnight. I mean we're talking in the span of like maybe ten twelve, fifteen years. People went from they just worked at home three or four days a week to having to work twelve to thirteen hour days, seven days a week in a factory just to make less money than they had been making before at home.

Yeah. And the other thing too, was this wasn't like the beginning of automation. There had been automation and textile manufacturing for a little while at this point. But and this is very key, Queen Elizabeth one saw the writing on the wall way back in the day and said, hey, William Lee, you want a patent for this machine. You can't have one because that's going to put too many people out of work. So it's very interesting that, you know, long before this happened, you know, with the Luddites, Queen Elizabeth the first like saw what was coming.

Yeah, that was pretty precient for sure. And so so yes, that's a big misconception. People are like, these machines just came up out of nowhere and all of a sudden it just disrupted everything. No, the machines have been there for hundreds of years. What changed was the way that the machines were used and that they were improved along the way. Like the machine that William Lee invented in fifteen eighty compared to the machines that were being used in seventeen eighty or eighteen hundred or eighteen ten were pretty different. The ones that came later were much much better. And that there were a bunch of different machines that were used in the weaving textile creation process that had all become improved enough that you could put them all together and have and create a mill. That was a that was part one of why this all kind of happened at the time that it did.

Yeah, I mean, you know, if you have a factory, it can't just be the machine that makes the thing. You need all the other machines to automate that process as well if you want a really efficient system. And so that's what happened. One of the other things that happened to kind of you know, and again we keep saying steamroll or steam power, but this thing was full and full steam ahead when Adams when Adam Smith wrote a book in seventeen seventy six called an inquiry into the nature and causes of the Wealth of Nations, No Colon No. And we've talked a lot about Adam Smith on the show, and he was the guy that basically said, Hey, you know what, free markets the way to go. Laissez faire economics is a way to go. Let people stay out of things, Let the market work it out, Let the manufacturers and the business owners work it out with the workers and the merchant class like, why are you splitting all these profits? Like you should be keeping the lion's share of this stuff. And the merchant class was like, I love this book.

Yeah. And to be fair to Adam Smith, like he wasn't advocating for workers to get completely screwed over. His arguments and his ideas and his theory of free market competition were interpreted in a way by the merchant class to mean that they should be self interested and maximize profits as much as they could. He wasn't necessarily expressly saying that. He almost seems to have been a little naive, or at the very least, he didn't predict the way that his theory would be used.

I think, oh, I mean, I think that's exactly the thing was he thought. When he was saying it'll work itself out, he wasn't saying to the benefit of few and the detriment of many. He was saying, they'll all just kind of like, as we will see that England did. They were kind of like, hey, you guys will work this out and we should just stay out of it, and I'm sure you'll come to a fair agreement.

Yeah. So kind of I guess, kind of like the pendulum's going to swing this way, and then they'll swing back that way and that way, and they'll finally just settle in the middle. But the pendulum ended up swinging one way toward owners management capital and just got stuck their mid air and has been there ever since.

Yeah, that's a pendulum. What do you call a pendulum that doesn't swing anymore? Sounds like a riddle. Okay, So we got to stick now.

So there was a third factor too, and that was the economic background of England. And at the turn of the nineteenth century it was in a really big recession at the time.

Yeah, they had been at war with Napoleon for a long time. That's going to drain your you know, your resources as a nation. And then they also because they were at war with France, had blockades against each other, but shut down a big trade partner. Those markets that were open to those merchants in England were suddenly closed and it hit everyone across the board in England like there was like families were going hungry for the first time in a long time.

Yeah, people who had been able to escape you know, previous recessions were getting hit hard. So the reason that this is important is that, first of all, now you have desperate workers who are in a situation that they need help, which puts them in a disadvantage. And then at the same time, you also have a good reason, especially now that everyone's read the Wealth of Nations, for the owners of these looms, what were the merchant class and are about to become the first industrialists, They have a good reason to replace workers with automated machines. Because profits are starting to dwindle. You want to maximize profits. So that's a really great way to do it. Replace a bunch of people who you have to pay like a fair wage to with some machines that you just pay for upfront and then hire some teenager to make sure it keeps running and pay them peanuts for doing so.

Boy, this was really the beginning of the downfall of everything. Is this is the beginning of Hey man, this stuff's not going to be as good, but who cares. We can make it for cheap, and we can sell it for cheaper, and if they wear out, people can just buy another cheap version of it that will make It's like this was the beginning of the drop of in craftsmanship and quality and everything.

I think that's why I find this period so fascinating, because our modern world was created like here in this like decade actually just a few years really, And it's funny that you say the quality of goods went down, because I've seen more than once it argued that the thing that really sparked the Luddite movement was not the new technology, was not the unfair treatment, was not the poor wages. It was the decline in the quality of what was being produced. What formerly like socks essentially stockings, what had been produced before with great craftsmanship and sold at a fair price, was now being made really cheaply and sold cheaply. And that that's what really set off the people who were in the text industry to basically riot.

Later on, Yeah, I mean what it did was it put them in a position where they were, you know, if you wanted to stay out of that and remain because it's not like every single small you know business textile crafts person went out of business overnight, like they were like I could keep this open, like I actually own my own loom, but now I have to, you know, use cheaper goods and sell them cheaper if I want to keep up, or you know, just give up and go work for them. And neither one of those were good prospects.

No, no, because there were zero regulations at the outset of this, so the mill owners just did whatever they wanted and you could either go out on the street and starve, or you could come work for me under my terms. And so the work in the mills was really difficult. They kept it really damp in there, so tuberculosis would run rampant and kill a bunch of people. The fabric, like little parties of fabric could give you long damage. The machines all together were really loud, so they could give you hearing damage. And the machines were really dangerous too, like people would lose their lives, including children. That again, we're working thirteen fourteen hour days, seven days a week at the mill.

Yeah, and they didn't need those artisans anymore because they could train a seventeen year old to run these automated you know, the automated machinery. And this was like, you know, this was the birth of capitalism. When quality went down, prices went down, Fewer and fewer workers getting paid less for more work, and the people that own the joint getting rich.

Right. But I think for those of us alive today, because capitalism was birth this way, a lot of people are like, well, capitalism doesn't work, it's inherently exploitive. That's not true. It was just born that way. It doesn't have to be that way, but it was born that way, and it was allowed to remain that way and grow up that way, so that it's just so commonplace now that people think like that's the only way it can be. And I firmly believe that there's an equitable way to do capitalism. Ye're just not doing it. That that's what the issue is, and that that's this is where that started.

Yeah, that chip has sailed, my friend that I is not moving disagree. Oh, you think there's going to be a big change in that.

I think, Yeah, I think there can be. I'm not saying there definitely will be, but I think that there's there's the potential for it. Sure, I don't think it's completely it's just going to be that way forever. Not necessarily. It could be, but I don't think that is definitely going to be. That's my take.

All Right, Well, I admire you're optimism. So shall we take a break. Yeah, all right, all right. One thing that we mentioned in act one, uh, you like that? Fancying this thing up a little bit?

I forgot to introduced the gun that goes off in Act three, That's right. You know what I found out who that was? I was Chekhov that said that.

Yeah, you finally found that out.

Sure, I thought it was you.

No, Are you serious? You thought that was me?

No. I knew it was kind of like a trope, but I didn't know that Chekhov had come up with it. I guess I'm not so familiar with nineteenth century plays as you.

Well, you probably never took drama class or dumb English classes where you read dramas. Well.

What's said is, I was they tried and true drama kid in high school. So are you really Yeah, we just didn't do any Chekhov. It was all slapstick comedy in my high school.

Well, if the rubber chicken is introduced in act one.

It comes back to life and kills everyone in act three.

All right, where was I? Okay? Act one when we spoke of the misconception that Luddites are afraid of technology, and I hinted a little further about what I'm going to say now, which is they tried to They tried to work it out. They weren't like, oh my gosh, industrialization's happening. We need to fight it tooth and nail. They were more like, hey, it looks like this is happening, so let's uh, you know, there's gonna be a man one day named Josh Clark who will believe that this can still happen. We want to make it fair for everyone, so like, we'll do this, We'll do this work, give us a minimum wage, make these working conditions safe, maybe tax these goods to create these pensions for people that you're definitely putting out of work, and let's like just roll this out slowly. Let's not just go full steam ahead here and give people time to like learn how to do something else, and they went nope, nope, nope, nope, nope.

Yeah, and that's just so contrary to what people think of as the Ludites today. I mean, if you even know about the lud Heights beyond you know, the modern use of the word, that there was an actual group, you probably still don't think that they were a reasonable group. That's not exactly what they're known for because they broke a bunch of machines, but that was exactly their initial response. They wanted in, but they wanted in fairly, and so, like you said, the responses to the request were no, no, no, no no. And it wasn't just the factory and mill owners that were saying no. The government was also saying no. And essentially, when the workers went to Parliament, when some labor friendly parliamentarians MPs tried to get legislation passed that kind of helped workers be treated more fairly, it just did not pass. And the idea was, the reasoning was among parliament that anything we would do would just screw things up, like any regulations we create are just going to hamper business, maybe put business people out of business. Their employees are going to be out on the street. And so a job where you're exploited is preferable to no job at all. And since any meddling we might do will will possibly cause you to lose your job, we're just not going to get involved.

Yeah, but they did get involved, but they got involved for the other side, Yeah, big time. In seventeen ninety nine, they passed the Combination Acts, which outlawed the trade gills that had kept them, you know, protected up into that point. It stopped them from collective bargaining. It outlawed strikes, so they took away basically any tool they would have to you know, get fair treatment in better wages. And this is another key point too, was they had had machines before we talked about that Queen Elizabeth, you know, not granting the patent, but the machines were still around since the mid seventeen hundreds, and some of those machines had been broken in the past in protest. But they augmented this law basically on the books that said, hey, if you start up with that stuff again, you're going to to go to the gallows and be hanged in front of the town.

Yeah. So just to kind of put that into perspective today. Imagine if hacking carried the death penalty, that's kind of akin to what it was like, but even more simplified than that. It'd be more like breaking the computer that your employer gave you when you were hired, like I'm perfecting.

Or going into an apple store with a crowbar.

But imagine that that carried the death penalty. So when you put all of that together, the government Parliament was essentially saying, get to work, and whatever the mill owners tell you to do, you're going to do it, and if you try to resist, you got us to deal with. That's the way things are. That's essentially what Parliament said. As the blood heites and the textile workers who would become ludites, we're trying to approach us from a reasonable manner.

Yeah, absolutely, And that started, you know, a couple of years of what thees are known for for busting these machines up and and more, which we'll get to, but you know, they pointed to the previous you know, a couple of hundred years earlier, when they had already been breaking machines, and that stuff happened, But it just kind of came and went. The Ludites were organized. There were a lot more of them. They were super coordinated. One historian that you found said that you know, talked about how well branded they were because they were they were known as something. They were known as Luddites, ironically leaderless, even though supposedly this what by all accounts is an urban legend named ned Lud was their leader.

Yeah, so just a little on ned Lud. It's it's pretty clear that ned Lud, especially as leader of the Luddites, never existed. He was fictitious. It's possible that there was somebody named Edward Ludlam who was the real life person that ned Lud became based on. But the story of the whole thing, the story of ned Luod, is that in seventeen seventy nine, a young I think he was a weaver named ned Lud was either told by his father or boss whoever he was working for at the time to tighten his needles or square his needles which means titan his weave, or he was told to create cheaper, cheaper product faster. Either way, in a fit of rage, he broke his loom, he broke the machine that he was working on, and protest so This was seventeen seventy nine, and by the time that eighteen eleven rolls around, which is when the Ludites really started to rise up, ned Lud was kind of like this catch all in the textile community. Anytime something happened to a loom, it broke. It was purposely broken. It was just kind of like Ned Luod did it. You're gonna hate this analogy, so I'm sorry in advance, but it was kind of like the family Circus kids. I ton't know. Yeah, oh wow, that was surprising. I like my teeth were clenched waiting for your response.

Yeah, I couldn't remember, because there are other examples of that, of like a made up person of like so and so did it that weren't even real people. I just can't think of them. So family Circus is the perfect analogy.

Okay, great, well, thank you. Wow, I was not expecting this. I'm going to have to take up break here for a second.

I mean, I hate the Family Circus. Still, you didn't win me over, okay, but I love the ref Everything's back to normal good. But regardless, ned Lud was kind of this urban legend went by, you know, King Lud Captain lud General lud But all of this was the idea that he was the leader of the Ludites when there was no clear leader. I mean, you know, in different places, depending where it was taking place. There were of course people who might have led the charge that night or for that operation, but there was no like central leader. Yet they remained like highly organized.

Yeah, I mean, like the Ludites weren't act actual group that spread across the Midlands and into Yorkshire from eighteen eleven to eighteen thirteen. Some people say eighteen sixteen because there was another uprising that year, but really the Blood Height Revolution took place from eighteen eleven to eighteen thirteen, and there it was a group of people of textile workers who had sworn a secret oath to this organization. But like you said, it was decentralized. There was no Nedlood. But they were so organized that the British government and the officials and the mill owners who were trying to break up this organization believed that there very much was a Nedlood. There had to be a Nedlood because who else was leading these people and stirring up unrest that was spreading across the northern part of the country.

So I don't even think we mentioned like the very first thing that happened, that was in March of eighteen eleven, when a group of you know, these these what would be known as Luddites a little bit later on, took to the streets in protests of of their pay, their working conditions. The British troops came in, broke it up, and they dispersed, but they came back later that night, and that was the first night of this new like, hey, let's break everything. They went to a mill, they trashed everything inside and that was sort of the first rubber chicken fired in this new round of busting stuff up.

Yeah, that was March. The next big thing that happened was in November there was a group of Luodites who attacked the home of Edward Hollingsworth, who was an owner of several automatic looms. He was, I guess kind of like a craftsman merchant, all rolled into one. The reason that he was targeted is because he was using those looms to make these new cheap stockings that had just completely undermined the entire stocking trade. And so they broke all of the looms in the guy's house and left, and Edward Hollingsworth was like, well, at least they didn't burn my house down. And then a week later the blood Heites came back and burned his house down.

Yeah that was Yeah, it seemed like a little much, but yeah, it was an avengeful act that happened because they were mad.

Yeah, and so we should say there's like a lot of attacks like this between eighteen eleven and eighteen thirteen. And it all started in Nottingham, sure, in Nottingham specifically, and it just kind of spread. It was a great idea among these pent up, angry textile workers whose entire worlds had just been upended. So it spread very, very easily, and it was I think in a December issue of the Nottingham Review that the story of ned Blood was told. And that's when they became known as the Luodites. And so these textile workers, like I said, they swore a secret oath to protect this organization with their lives, and in doing so, they swore an allegiance to, like you said, Kinglood General Blood, and of course the textall workers knew that ned Blood didn't exist, and to kind of underscore that, they placed his base of operations in Sherwood Forest in Nottingham, which probably sounds familiar to anybody who's seen any version of Robin Hood.

Yes, very cheeky thing to do, for sure. One of the other misconceptions is that the Luddites were so angry that they just trashed everything with reckless abandoned and went after everyone and tried to wreck all these factories. That wasn't the case. They were very targeted. Anyone that was known to be like a good boss and a good factory owner who treated their employees more fairly. They did not go and trash their factory. The people who were known to be especially bad and egregious violators of workers' rights, they were targeted. But they even got letters beforehand a lot of times that were like, hey, you got a chance here to change things. Otherwise next week we're gonna trash your factory or move those things out of there, make some changes, or it's happening, and they would not do that. Sometimes they would try and move their machinery out of there. But because these were kind of working class heroes, they would get tipped off on when these caravans were doing that, and so in the middle of the night. They would intercept these caravans and you get them out there instead of in the factory.

I just see the mill owners trying to remove their looms in the middle of the night, like Otho trying to escape and Beetlejuice.

Have you seen the new trailer yet for the new one?

No? And I don't want to see it. I just want to go into that movie completely unaware of everything.

Well you should, I mean, it looks like Beetlejuice. I hope it didn't spoil it.

Yes you did, you didn't, That's fine, but I yeah, I'm very excited about seeing that. No.

Same here. I wanted to see that Broadway play but it went away, did it? Yeah? It was supposed to be really good. So I don't know if it just had its and stopped or what.

I'll bet it's playing in New Mexico somewhere.

Well, I think there is a traveling version, so maybe it'll come through or New Mexico. So they were breaking looms at a rate of about one hundred and seventy five a month. It's got very costly for you know, the machinery replacement costs of productivity not happening not, you know, putting out these stockings and socks and things. And in eighteen twelve things really really changed for the scarier and maybe that's a good time for another break.

Sure I was not expecting that, but yes.

All right, we'll keep everyone on the edge of their stockings and we'll be right.

Back, okay, Chuck. So you said eighteen twelve was kind of like a watershed year, and definitely was. Things got much more violent. Essentially, the Luddites and the Ludite movement as it was spreading across the Midlands and into Yorkshire, became engaged in all at war with mill owners. And it could be you know, a handful of them wearing masks and carrying swords and muskets that would attack, you know, someone's house and break all their looms. It could be two thousand of them, like what happened in one attack in March, I believe, or it could be a couple of hundreds. One of the most famous was called the Battle of Rofold's Mill in Huddersfield in West Yorkshire, and there were between one hundred and two hundred, depending on who you ask, former workers of that mill who stormed it one night and it just got super violent.

Yeah, because these owners had had enough, they start hiring armed guards like mercenaries basically to stand by and watch with their rifles. And there was a gun battle too. I believe two of the Luddites were shot. They later died. They retaliated. They assassinated William Horsefall, which was a really sort of ardent anti Ludite. He had talked about riding up to his saddle Gerson Ludite blood, and so they went after him assassinated him in a bar. I think he ended up dying a couple of days later. But they shot him in the thighs, the hip, and the testicles, and not that that's funny. I don't know why I laughed, but it just seemed like a particularly egregious thing to do. And they took him back to the bar where he was had been spouting off and drinking, and he died there a couple of days later.

Something ironic about that is that Horsefall when he left that bar initially before he got shot, he had just bought a round of drinks for some of his workers. Yeah, talk about irony.

Yeah.

One other thing to know about the Luodites is that their secret was not only kept by them, but by the communities that they came from. You might think like, Okay, these guys are burning down mills and breaking machines, they're putting people out of work, and that's absolutely true. They also would go into people's homes and requisition weapons to use for raids, and yet almost universally they were beloved and kept secret by the local communities. And this evidenced by the army of spies that the British government sent in to try to break up this movement. Who could get nowhere? They got nothing, and as a matter of fact, the spies started reporting back that there was such a person as ned Luod. They got so their their efforts were just that frustrated.

Yeah, so they've sent in spies, they're getting nowhere. There's actual bloodshed happening now at a quicker rate, and so they're like, we got to do something. We have to get involved militarily, and they sent in troops, initially just a sort of quiet things down. They had fourteen thousand troops station in the Midlands, in Yorkshire. They had more people stationed there than they had fighting the War of Napoleon at the time.

That's crazy.

They you know, they had some sort of effect, but they didn't completely like break the movement up. And so they finally said, all right, remember that death penalty stipulation we put in there about going into the apple store with a crowbar. We're going to start enforcing that. And they started hanging dozens of Luddites in public after hasty trials, sometimes even teenagers, and that was what really got everyone's attention that they could be put to death for this.

Yeah, there was one particularly grim day in Lancashire where I think they hanged fourteen Bloodites, including, like you said, a teenager, a sixteen year old who'd only acted as a lookout for one of the raids. And they were clearly making an example out of these people. These were very public trials, very public hangings. They built special gallows so they could hang multiple people at the same time, like they were The British government was saying like, we're just gonna keep doing this. We're going to kill you if we catch you, so you better stop, and that's what finally worked. Other people, by the way, were transported to Australia, sometimes for life. They would just take them there and be like you're Australia. Now good for them, right, all of that put together, the fact that now the one remaining tool they had in their toolbox to try to fight for equal treatment or at least better treatment at work was now like they would get the death penalty for that. That finally broke up the Light eight movement around eighteen thirteen.

Yeah, and they had about another dozen years of you know, pretty bad treatment until finally there was a bit of a wake up call for the British government and in eighteen twenty four Parliament said, you know what, maybe unions are a decent idea after all, they repeal that ban on unions. But you know, like I said, that ship at sail, there was no putting the genie back into the bottle at this point. And the you know, like we mentioned a few times, the popular sort of view of Luddites these days is not entirely right. They didn't hate the technology. They tried to work things out in a fair way. They tried to stand up for workers' rights very early on. And it seems like a lot of sort of the rewriting of that came from a novelist and scientist named CP Snow who looks like it was the first person to kind of cast them as, you know, anti technology, which was reinforced again in the seventies in New Scientists and other publications.

Yeah so, at least by the seventies, if not earlier, Ludites were now synonymous with being afraid, usually irrationally afraid of technology or the future, or in some cases you were anti capitalist is another way to some people use it right, And that lasted that way for a while until Thomas Pinchon, the famous author of Gravity's Rainbow, among others, in nineteen eighty four he wrote an essay essentially saying like I'm not so sure we should scoff at ludites. He wrote an essay called is it Okay to be a Luddite and basically said, if you stop and look around at the way that technology is going, maybe we should be a little bit afraid. Maybe we should start questioning some of this stuff. And in nineteen eighty four he made a warning about like you really want to keep your eye on artificial intelligence in eighty four, And what's really interesting is around twenty twenty three, I think there was an author named Brian Merchant who wrote a book called Blood in the Machine, and he essentially said he didn't cite Pinchon. I don't think I haven't read the books. Possibly did, But essentially what he was saying is that what Pinchon predicted has now come to roost. That AI is starting to creep closer and closer to this, creating a world that's even more upended, even more quickly, putting even more people out of work than what happened to the textile workers the ludites at the beginning of the nineteenth century.

Yeah, and he said, and then there shall be a Justine Bateman who is the new Thomas pinch On. What you know, we've talked about it before. She's the actor Justine Bateman from Family Ties. Of course, she's sort of the leading voice in Hollywood fighting against you know, AI destroying Hollywood, gotcha.

Yeah. So yeah, that's one thing that people are questioning. I mean, just that when chat GPT came out, it was like, we know companies that actually fired people. They're like, oh, good, but can fire you now? First chance? They got right, So it is worth questioning. And that's what Merchant and some of these neo Ludites are saying. They're like, we should stop and say like Okay, where's this technology going? Who exactly is making this technology that's going to totally change our world? How can we pret tech people who are about to lose their jobs all the same questions the loatites asked at the beginning of the nineteenth century and then face the death penalty for trying to do something about And the most ironic thing, Chuck, the most ironic thing of all is the people who are questioning where artificial intelligence are going are being branded as lotites.

Yeah, and that's our show. We're going to do a Q and A.

I know that is that we end live shows, but not episodes. But it was just too perfect.

Many No, that was a very live showy ending. We just don't have our traditional handshake afterward.

We even held for applause for a second we did.

I heard none, So.

I'm taking it you got nothing else, right?

I got nothing else?

All right? Well, if you want to know more about lutites, go read about them, read about neo Luddites, read about everything you can. And since I said that, it's time for listener mail.

This is from Cash and this is about doctor Browner, and this is going to include we'll business plug for Cash took. Hey, guys, just listen to the Doctor Bronner's episode and thought of a use that you guys didn't mention and maybe we'd get a kick out of it. Is a fantastic insecticidal soap. I run a small gardening business in Portland, Maine, one of our favorite towns, that focuses on designing and creating gardens that don't require much human input and no chemical input. Generally, I don't treat pests, and that's even in quotes and let nature run its course. But for the particularly tough ones like scale and viburnum leaf beetle, I treat with Doctor Bronner's diluted with one six water with a spray bottle, works wonders and has no negative ecological impacts. Love the show. You guys are a great company on my long days working alone. And hey, if you are in Portland, Maine or nearby, check out Cash at founder Opus Fine Gardens.

Well thanks a lot, Cash, and we are happy to plug your business. And if you want to be like Cash instead, end us an interesting email and plug your business at the same time. We are happy to do that. Email us at Stuff Podcasts at iHeartRadio dot com Stuff you Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio.

For more podcasts my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.

Stuff You Should Know

If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD,  
Social links
Follow podcast
Recent clips
Browse 2,527 clip(s)