The Fencing Of The Commons

Published Jun 17, 2025, 9:00 AM

When England privatized its commons – lands that by custom belonged to all English to work and support themselves for centuries – it began the modern era, industrialization, wage labor, industrialization, or all of those things and more.

Welcome to Stuff you should know, a production of iHeartRadio.

Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh, and there's Chuck and Jerry's here too, and we're just trucking along doing our thing. It's called Stuffy Show. Oh.

Is this the episode on the Great seventies movie Convoy.

No, this is the episode on the Coming Down the Pike in the Future movie Fencing the comments.

Oh I thought it was Fencing the Convoy.

No.

Boys, a lot of mashups happening.

Yeah, we should probably let's stop joking around. We've had a lot of fun here, but let's get serious. We're talking about fencing the Commons. And for anybody who heard our episode on the Tragedy of the Commons, they're fairly related. They're talking about the same thing. The Commons are both the same thing, but there's radically different stuff going on here. Just go listen to our Tragedy of the Commons episode. I won't give a rundown of it. But fencing the Commons, some people point to it is this process of separating and extracting land from people to whom it had formerly belonged. Everyday people literally commoners.

Yeah, or maybe not belong but at least you know, made use of to survive.

Okay, Well, it depends on who you ask, and it is possible, say some historians that this is where wealth inequality came from, that this is where wage labor came from, that this is where a lot of the really not great features of the modern world were rooted. And when you dig into it, you're like, wow, this is a decision by a really self interested group of powerful people to pull off a really big land grab. J All the old England.

Boy, I love that self edit there.

Thanks, that's between you and me, Jerry and the lamp post.

That's right. Shall we get on with it? Then?

Yes, I feel like that was a good setup. If I did say so myself.

I agree, just like the old days. Not that your setups now are no good, but.

In the old days it would have been like, Chuck, have you ever eaten grass off of the Commons?

Yeah? I think in that last Commons episode actually mentioned that the Commons was the area of our high school in just the big middle open area inside where everyone would hang out, because that was a common area and that's what the Commons are in this case too. And Lyvia did a bang up job with this one.

I think yes she did not, as we.

Say, yeah, out of the commons, and we're going to start, as Livia suggests, with William the Conqueror, because that makes sense in this case. The Normans when they conquered England in ten sixty six, they said, all right, here's what we're gonna do. All the the wealthy, noble people of our land are going to get all the land, and so let's just divide it all up. They're going to live there on manners. And if you if you have a manor house, you are the lord of that manor. You're you have allegiance to the king, obviously. But on that land of yours, besides your manor house, there's also going to be a peasant village. There's gonna be some some great farmland that they're going to work for you, so they can give you lots of food. And then there's also the commons, which all of the peasant people or commoners can can share. They can divide it up and share it and live off that stuff.

Yeah, and this land was not the commoner's land. This is not peasant's land. This is the medieval era. I guess it kicked off the medieval era, and just to be clear, this was this was the lord's land like you were saying, but the commoners had what are called use of fructory rights, which is basically like they don't own the land, but they have like actual legal right to use and to work that land and to take the products of their work from that land to sustain themselves. So this is the arrangement like that, and it worked pretty well for several centuries, it turns.

Out, yeah, it did. You know. They divided that land into basically straight strips and we'll get into that in a second, for each household. And there was also the waste, which will come into play. It sounds like a terrible word to name basically the forest, but you know, it's where they couldn't farm, but it was you know, it's where the rivers were, that's where the trees were, So that's where they hunted and fished and gathered peat and wood and stuff like that. So it's still very valuable area as far as use goes. But they called it waste.

It was just not a good, good term.

Yeah, I agreed.

But so with the farmland themselves, like you said, they cut them up into strips, and just imagine like a series of fields. One field is just grass. We'll call that like the meadow. It's where all the sheep and the cows are grazing. Now there's another field, and that's where a bunch of cropland is growing. There's another field. There's more crop land, and if you look very closely, the crop land is divided up into very long, thin strips, and each of those strips belongs to a different person who farms that common land in both fields. And that's how things were divided up. And you didn't have two strips next to each other because they didn't want anybody to get like all the good dirt. Yeah, and then you would have strips in both fields because there were different things growing in different fields, and the whole thing rotated every few years, and a different field would become the new meadow because the sheep and the cows would peep, poop on it and fertilize it for next time around when it became cropland again.

Yeah. So it was just basic crop rotation that made a lot of sense. They would let it rewild. They you know, they were straight because they had these very tough to use plows that did not turn very well, so they just made these long, straight strips. They would take care and share the oxen that it took to pull these plows for everyone.

Yeah, that was a big one.

And it was you know, it was sort of like a It wasn't like like communism or anything or socialism. It was just like how it was. It was like, hey, we're all going to care for this land. We're going to rotate the crops so the land stays good for all of us, and we're gonna all help take care of the ox and will help each other out. And we're not going to put up fences because the animals have to graze around, and we all just have to agree on how to do this, and they basically did.

Well. That's the big one. Because you are sharing strips with your neighbors in a single field, everybody has to do the same farming all at the same time. It's almost like the group of commoners working those fields were collectively one single farmer making these decisions on when to harvest, when to plow, when to do all that stuff. And like I said, it worked pretty well. It's important because these people are the losers in this situation, and we usually root for the underdog. So we have to be careful not to overidealize life in a medieval English peasant village like it was tough. Good point, like if if your crops failed and it turned out that your your neighbors thought you worshiped some new knows, they might burn you at the stake. Like it was. It was not necessarily the easiest life, but it seems to be a life that was very satisfactory to the peasants because when it came time for them to be forced to give it up, they did not want to give it up. They wanted to keep living like that because the alternative that they were given was not preferable to peasant village life.

Yeah, it's like, hey, go move to the same and work in a textile mill. So they didn't necessarily also divide this up evenly. It was, you know, it was divided up according to like a lot of like inherited steaks that had been around for a long long time in the families. There were people that did not get any land at all and basically were just the hired farm hands even within the peasant village. But they did get resources that could generally hunt and fish and things like that. In the waste after the harvest. If they were like you know, crops that were leftover or not completely utilized, they a lot of times could had access to those, So you know, they were getting along okay. You know when you look at the alternative, which is having no land at all to farm, I guess.

Yeah. And although there was inequality, you could still work your way up. There were people who had more land than they necessarily needed. Yeah, so if you were land you could sublet that land, work that land, and start giving yourself a foothold and maybe eventually buy that strip or those strips of field for yourself. So it seems like, yes, there were some people who were wealthier than others, but the difference in income equality and social equality is much closer, right than it would become in the next few centuries.

Yeah, for sure. And they also, you know, thought ahead, like, hey, you within this system, you can't just get so rich and still be here. So they had an income cap basically, so if you went above that, they're like, sorry, you're you're not a commoner anymore. You can't farm this land. And they did this in a pretty democratic way. They had a local council that they elected that you know, every year they would allocate these strips for different households and stuff like that. They would set fees for like you know, grazing and pasturing and stuff like that and get their agricultural calendar and order. And yeah, that's just how it went for a long time. And like you said, for a couple hundred years, it wasn't it worked out pretty well?

It did so apparently around twelve thirty five, so people have been farming like this for a couple hundred years. By then, there was a statute passed, and I don't know the ins and outs of it, but it was called the Statute of Merton.

I wonder if the statute was named for the famously long necked defensive back for the San Francisco forty nine ers, Merton Hanks.

Obviously it was, but regardless of who it was named after, the Statue of Merton said that if you were the lord of a manor and you want to like close off your whole, well, I guess manner. If you want to close off some of it, you can do that legally from now on, but you have to make sure that there's plenty of common land left for the peasants to work and live on. And I guess whoever that was passed for was like yes, and everybody else didn't pay much attention to it for about one hundred or so years, and then something happened in England and Europe in general that really altered the trajectory of history, and that was the Black Death, when as much as half half of the people in England died off from this one plague in just a couple of years.

So this it's interesting to see how things like this in history can just change the course of history, right, because had the Black Death not happened, obviously a lot of people would have still been alive. But aside from that, like this may have never gone down that way because it was just a radical shift in the way the country looked and how they had to operate moving forward. Because obviously, when half the people go away and leave the planet.

Is that how I'm saying this now, I think I sniffed up the case forever.

Yeah, like it was the snap or something. There's gonna be a labor shortage, just the nuts and bolts of it is, there's gonna be far less people to do that kind of work, which was kind of good for the peasants at the time, because all of a sudden they had some bargaining power and they said, hey, maybe we should get paid a little more. We also don't need as much food because there's only half the people. And so that all of a sudden paved the way for more sheep grazing because England started realizing, hey, there's a lot more money and a lot easier money to be made in textiles and shearing the sheep and selling wool in the wool trade than there is this farming, Like that's for the birds, right.

So, because sheep are much less labor intensive, require way fewer farmers, but more land, the people who are wealthy started going after enclosure more and more. They started following that statute of Merton Hanks and saying like, oh, yeah, I want to enclose this. I'm going to enclose this and turn it into grazing land for sheep. And people were actually displaced. Some people were some entire villages were displaced. And it was as simple is that it was, you don't live here anymore, get out, and don't forget I'm the lord of the manor so what are you going to do about it? Sometimes there were armed people who would show up and tell them to leave. It was just as illegal and indefensible as that. But that's exactly what happened. People were moved out for sheep because they could make more money off of wool than they could off of crops, because there weren't that many people who needed the crops in the first place. So this huge land grab first started because the price of wool was pretty expensive, and that started the first what you would call really the first wave of enclosure back in the fourteenth fifteenth century.

Yeah, and you know what we mean by fencing an enclosure is literal fencing because they had to keep those sheep there. If not, the sheep were going to go away, so they had to physically construct barricades to keep these fences in. Sometimes they were literal fences. Sometimes there were these hedges. But yeah, if you're thinking, like you know topiari type, you know, finery of a English garden, it's more like a hedge that they train to grow so thick and then vines attached to that that it essentially acts as a fence.

Yeah, like you just can't get through it. There's too many brambles and blackberries and all that stuff. So, yeah, these hedges. If you're British, you are probably pretty fond of your hedges. They're part of British culture. But outside of Britain, it's worth going to Britain just to see the hedges. So the hedges have like two or three Michelin stars, I can't remember.

That's right. The other thing we have to point out here is that sometimes it was a little more like how it was supposed to work officially is different than how it went down in practice. Officially, you were supposed to get unanimous consent of all the stakeholders of the Commons in order to sell that often fence it up for your sheet, but it obviously didn't always work out that way. Like you said, sometimes he just took it. Sometimes they forced them to move to a very much less desire. They're like, here, take this land. It's not nearly as fertile, but look I gave you something. And sometimes yeah, it was just completely illegal.

Yeah, so some people were like, hey, this is kind of messed up. One of the most well known voices was Thomas Moore, who wrote his book Utopia in fifteen sixteen, and he was pretty clearly against the sheep. He called them the great devourers who devoured entire communities. And you know, obviously it wasn't the sheep's fault. They were just doing what they do, which is kind of a yeah, I know, they really took the brunt of it. But it was because of this, the raising sheep that became so profitable that that's what was really devouring the communities. And it got the ear of Henry the seventh. Remember he was the guy who killed Richard the third and took over. He was the first Tudor king. He said, hey, I am hearing what you're saying. So let's kind of slow down these enclosures because we don't want to uproot the peasantry. We want them to keep doing what they do, because that is England as far as anyone thinks of England.

Yeah, so that's sort of the first bucket of enclosure, the first wave, I guess, the first tronch, the first trunch. That's right. So maybe we should take a break and we'll come back with a little more intense enclosure right after this.

And things A job in job.

All right, So, as promised, we talked about the first wave of enclosure, and now the second wave a couple of hundred years later comes back in a much more intense form because the government, like the whole government of England, said all right, this is how we're going to do things now, because in the last couple of hundred years, textile making has really become the thing. Although we're getting most of our wool and cotton and stuff from our various colonies all over the world, it's not like we need all this for sheep. We think this is just the way to go because we really need to make our whole agricultural operation much more efficient, and it was not efficient when people were just doing their own thing with these little strips of land. Like one person or one entity needs to kind of be in charge of all of this so it'll be more efficient and smooth.

Right ideally, and in practice, a peasant could support himself and his family and you know, maybe have enough leftover to sell or something like that, but you can't really support a growing workforce, a labor force that you're creating basically out of whole cloth. With the industrial Revolution started in England thanks to these wool factories, converting them into textiles. You need a bunch of people for that. So you need to figure out how to take the people off the land and put them in the factories. And then you have to figure out how to feed those people from the land that you just move the people from, and you can pay them so that they actually have to buy the food from the land that you just forced them off of. Yeah, you can start to see what a bad deal it was. But because there was so much money to be made, because there was such a huge leap forward just waiting to be taken through the Industrial Revolution, the powers that be guided steered railroaded England and the English into the cities and the factories in the cities.

Yeah. And one of the biggest sort of pillars of this new system was the Norfolk four course system. And a guy named Lord Townsend nicknamed Turnip. I believe he brought this over from the Netherlands. His nickname was Turnip. And wouldn't you guess turnips are part of this four course system. It involved crop rotation, in this case wheat, turnips, barley, and clover. You might be wondering, like clover, what good is that?

Clover?

Was good for the grazing.

It's good for the bees, so honey, yeah, it's.

Good for the bees, it's good for the soil. And it also meant that they didn't need to let those fields go down for a season and rewild. They could just kind of keep rotating things and you could use those turnips to feed the livestock that are grazing on the clover, and previous to that, they might slaughter livestock at the end of the season in the early winter. Another big change was that the seed drill came along, which has allowed them to plant in these very long straight rows, just you know, endless, endless straight rows, and they planted grain. And guess who introduced that, Josh and audience, I.

Know who it is, Air and Air yep survivor.

Oh man, jeth Throw Toll baby.

Oh yeah, Jethrow Toll.

That's right.

I knew it all along. I was just teasing. So did you know Jethro Toll was a British band?

Oh? I did not. I just thought he was the guy that came up with the seed drill and was generally feeling like a dead duck.

No. Uh, they were a British band and apparently someone in their agent's office was a history buff and was telling them all about Jethrow Toll and what a great inventive person he was. So they're like, we'll just name our band Jethro Toll, even though it'll make no sense because it doesn't fit with our music at all. We're gonna name our band Jethrow Toll.

I think it kind of fits, do you think so? Yeah. When I think of seed drills, I think of flautists. I think of Ian Anderson dancing around on one leg like a flamingo.

Nice. Okay, I guess it makes sense now that you put it like that.

We talked about aqualon quite a bit on the show.

I don't know how you don't talk about aqualong like pretty frequently. It's just there. It's worth talking about, for sure.

I love very divisive song. I think it's great and kind of fun.

Oh yeah, some people hate it, boy, a lot of people.

Yeah, I wonder why it's a weird song.

It's odd. So I guess the upshot of all this is that an industrial revolution was coincidental with an agricultural revolution, and one fueled the other, which is pretty interesting because this is happening at the exact same time. But even still, the government was like, you can't just go in and steal people's land. If you want to enclose your land and consolidate it so that you can create this super efficient agricultural land that you can make tons of money off of selling food again to the peasants who were just removed from that land that they used to farm, it just gets me chuck. You have to do that through act of parliament. You have to petition Parliament and say I want to enclose this land, and not only that, you have to have a supermajority of the local area to agree to it. And there were two things that helped people with this one. The same people who were trying to enclose the land were in Parliament or at least friends with them. And the people who provided the supermajority to say yes, you can enclose the land were their friends and neighbors and people in the same class. So it's not like these were huge obstacles that the people enclosing Great Britain had to overcome at the time.

Now, and if you're thinking like, oh, guys, are you telling me, they passed like thousands and thousands of acts of Parliament they did exactly that. They passed about four thousand of these between seven fifty and eighteen sixty, so just a little over one hundred years and almost eleven thousand square miles of England beginning at the start of the twentieth century was now enclosed. That's about a fifth of the entire area of the country. If you're wondering about the waste, we mentioned the waste. We don't want to let the waste go to waste. They were enclosed as well. Like it wasn't like they fenced all of that off, but a lot of it was. And they said, hey, I know you used to hunt and fish here, but now we're going to take our ritzy hunting parties out here and you're not going to be allowed to hunt. Or we may just raise it and have our own gardens. It might be like agricultural that you know, we get some of our food from, but it will probably be just like like you know, the English gardens that we love to gaze upon with our riches go off.

Yeah, yeah, I have a real problem with that as well. So people just didn't necessarily take this lying down. There were huge, huge waves and spasms of violence throughout the centuries from the beginning of enclosure up until the nineteenth century. This is a really, really big deal. You can trace it all the way back to the thirteen eighty one Peasants Revolt that wasn't entirely about enclosure, but it was a factor in it, and trace it up to the English Civil War where the Diggers came along. The Diggers were a radical faction of a radical group called the Levelers, and their whole thing was enclosure is a mess, and it's terrible and we're not going to put up with it. The Diggers, i think, kind of capture what the issue was to the peasants, and that was to them, if you were born British, you had a birthright to British soil, like the country belonged to you as much as it belonged to anybody else who was born in Britain, and your right was to work that soil and make a living for yourself however you wanted to. And coming in and enclosing this area and forcing people from that land with a violation of the birthright of those British people, and you know, they engaged in violence, and they would break down enclosures and fences and hedges, but ultimately they lost that battle or that war.

Yeah, and if you're wondering about uh, I feel like I'm waste guy today, which I come like it keeps just popping up. Whatever, it's my turn. And while I'm looking at the script, here is at my line.

This is your line. You didn't highlight your lines?

Sorry? Sorry? Yeah, as far as the waste goes, you know, I said that a lot of them were kind of closed off as well, so they couldn't use them. So obviously there's going to be some like saboteur action going on there. And these were commoners known as the Blacks, and they would poach deer on in the waste. They would destroy trees because trees all of it. I mean, there were always a bit of a commodity, but they became an increasing commodity because of the shipbuilding prowess, the growing shipbuilding prowess of England at the time, and the British Royal Navy fleet that was just growing and growing, British seapower Great band. So they were doing this and so the government passed the Black Act, which basically said all right, if you get caught poaching a deer on land that you hunted all your life, We're going to kill you. And it was the death penalty, and so hundreds of people were hanged for approaching those deer that they had always been hunting.

Yeah, so the way of life that these people lived was outlawed, and so to engage in that way of life you were now a criminal. And the crimes you committed e g. Killing a rabbit on enclosed land, maybe even chasing after a rabbit through someone's enclosed land could get you killed by the government. Like that's what happened with that. This is how serious things got. And back to the I'm going to take a waste one if you don't mind.

Well, the sub waste, which is the fens.

Okay, fine, it's not the greatest waste, but it's important because the fens were a and I think still are in some places, a big, vast marshy area of England. And the people who wanted to grow crops for that agricultural revolution and make a bunch of money, we're like, we should drain those because that'll immediately turn into a really great crop land. And the people who lived on the fence, the peasants, said, well, wh whoa, we're using those And so this kind of battle for public opinion broke out, and the people who were trying to make the money off of it told everybody else like, this is just waste land, like terrible land, not even the other version of waste. This is just terrible land that's not doing anybody any good. And the people who don't want to leave are too lazy to come into the cities and work, so forget them. And the peasants said, hey, we can make way more money working the fens than we can working for you in the cities. And it worked for a little while the fens. They managed to stave off the fens being drained from the seventeen hundreds for most of the seventeen hundreds, and then ultimately lost out. That's a recurring theme in this chuck. The people who are defending their right to the land ultimately lost out, over and over and over again.

Yeah, for sure, you'll be glad to know. Like, just like the first sort of wave of enclosure, when there were some people speaking up and saying like this is really the best idea. During the official parliamentary enclosure, some people, some officials even stepped forward and said, hey, I don't think this is the best thing that we're doing here. Those guy named Arthur Young, who who actually was a pro enclosure and was promoting that kind of stuff as the Secretary of the Board of Agriculture, But then as it started to play out, he was like, wait a minute, We've got these villages that are just drying up. We've got these commoners that are impoverished now, and so I'm going to whip up a report here and take it to the board. And they said this is in eighteen oh one, and they said, thanks, but no thanks, we're not even going to take a look at that.

I think I saw somewhere that something like three hundred and fifty English villages just vanished in that one hundred years of the parliamentary enclosures. Yeah, I mean just gone like gone.

Yeah. I guess there's different ways of looking at this, like you can't stop progress. And it's not like if this hadn't happened, there would still be these, you know, villages of commoners in this modern society. But it's the way it went down was just pretty despicable.

Yeah, for sure, there was another group that were similar to the diggers, but they were more interested in like income equality, fair wages, kind of industrialized stuff like workers' rights, but they were also interested in agrarian rights as well.

The chartists they made talked about them before, right.

Yes, in the Pinkerton episode, Alan Pinkerton started out as a chartist, that's right. And they tried to actually kind of get back to the land. They bought a bunch of these enclosed lands and turned them back into crop land. But I saw that they were a victim of their success because they had like seventy thousand people joining in to do this, and they just could not get enough land fast enough, so they ended up going bankrupt.

Yeah, and you know, like you said, they're just the way their country looked changed so radically, and it wasn't just about the way of life. It was like that the medieval village was a was something that the people of England, like that's all they knew. So all of a sudden, it's just everything is changing so fast, and it's being foisted upon them so fast. There were you know, there were poets and there were authors like writing these books and odes about you know, the destruction of the way of life that they had always known. So it was sort of in the in the cultural ether.

Yeah as well zeitgeist. Yeah.

I don't think they said zeitgeist then, did they.

Okay, so cultural ether. I didn't realize that was a term of the peasantry, but.

I guess I've had ether at the time either.

So Chuck, I say we take our second break and come back and talk more about this, like what actually happened from.

This, let's do it and things.

Okay, So we're back, and enclosure has become this orgy of land grabbing and displacement. One other thing we should have said is that Parliament kind of enforced movement to the city, so you would have your village stolen out from under you and turned into sheep grazing land or crop land or something like that, and now you were homeless. So legally you were considered a vagrant. Vagrancy was a crime. You were a criminal if you didn't have a place to live. So where you're gonna go? I need to make some money fast. I'm gonna move to the city and start working in the factory. So like just choice after choice was shut down for everybody, and the effects of this huge sweeping change in Britain just rippled across the world because one thing would feed into another thing, would feed into another thing, and then the whole thing would cycle back again. And every time it cycled back, it would just grow and grow and grow and grow. And the British Empire in the nineteenth century rose based on the agricultural revolution that fed the industrial revolution, and it just exploded. It just started to grow exponentially.

Yeah, for sure. I mean you can look at anytime something like this happens, you can kind of pick apart little small parts or not small changes. I guess they ended up being, you know, pretty monumental, but like just you know, did people live longer, were they healthier, did wages increase? Stuff like that? And wages for labor did rise, but it was really hard work. It was pretty intense stuff. It's hard to get a lot of data and nutrition sort of statistics for that time period, but if you look at things like you know, average heights and weights and things like that, it seems like malnutrition maybe increased because you know, people were working in these factories and it was pretty dangerous wage work and they didn't have like the best food available to them at the time. You're gonna have a lot more people that have less, so obviously they're going to turn to like the church or maybe even the government and say, hey, you kicked us out of our land. We're poor, we need help. You need to help us subside. And at the time, you know, and that's that's still, you know, a big debate all over the world like how much should should the rich help the poor? People just of regular means help the poor, And it was a thing back then. A lot, you know, a lot of people are saying like, hey, it's not the government's place to step in and support the poor. It's just not We're not going to get involved in that.

No, And a big one was Thomas Malthus, who wrote the Essay on the Principle of Population. We've talked about Malthus a lot. I think he even got his own episode, and he's unfairly saddled with the idea of like no, no, no, you just let the poor die. It's just a it's just a natural check and balance to prevent over population. And he was not advocating that. He was pointing out that is a check on overpopulation, not make sure that that happens. But he was the one, he was the first one to really get across, like, our agricultural production will never be able to keep up with population, and so we have to kind of be concerned about overpopulation at some point in time.

Yeah, for sure. So now you have a lot of people living in cities, far fewer people living in the rural farmland where they used to live. The population is actually rising a lot. Between seventeen fifty and eighteen fifty of one hundred years, it may have doubled, of course, this is you know, after being halved with the Black Death. It may have been you know, just sort of the way things went.

Yeah, twenty more people, Yeah, exactly.

But you know, there's there was a definite increase in efficiency of agriculture, Like no one can deny that. Like what they set out to do, they did pretty successfully because you had to support this larger population and free of those workers to work in the city, so that all worked well. If that was if that was your aim, if you're on that side of the argument, you could point to all those things and saying like, hey, our navy strong, we've got a great urban labor force now, and everyone's you know, everyone's happy.

Right, I mean, you could say quality of life in England, Rose, I mean the middle class, the merchant class suddenly exploded in wealth. There are a lot of people who got rich off of it, off of the Industrial Revolution and all the stuff that came from it. And you can kind of step back and look at England going from the people making sure the people fed themselves to making sure that the people of England and other places like Australia, New Zealand, Colonial America were supplying England like itself with the food it needed to put out these goods that it could then sell and continue to grow in wealth. That's kind of the switch that happened. And you've mentioned the British Navy, I mean, like they the enclosed wastes directly contributed to the rise of the British Navy because those timbers were used for shipbuilding, and as the British Navy grew more and more powerful, they had more and more clout to colonize more and more places, increasingly brutally, so that they could extract raw materials to feed into the industrial machine in the cities of England.

Yeah, for sure. And this inspired the rest of the world to go out and do likewise. As everything was becoming more modern. It certainly inspired probably what happened in Russia in eighteen sixty one when Alexander two said, you know what, no more serfdom in Russia. The landlords are going to just basically what they did in England. The landlords are going to get the best farming land serfs. You can buy that land back, but you got to take out these big heavy loans from maybe even your landlord or maybe the state, and you should move to the city. We got a rising growth in industry because of the Industrial Revolution, just like in England, and we're going to exploit you just like we did in England. And that led eventually in part to the Russian Revolution.

It did, and I mean, that's like a legitimate response to having your land stolen from you, uprising of peasants. It's just happened to work in Russia, where it kept getting tamped down by the government century after century. In England, and so the government and the the wealthy interested parties won out. But enclosure was so successful that Britain exported it to its colonies and basically said we're doing the same thing here so that you guys can become more and more efficient and provide more and more raw materials for export back and it just didn't happen. Just in the colonies. Scotland very famously had its highlands cleared of thousands of Highlanders, like they just came in, just like they did to the peasant villages and said get out, and if you don't, we've got sore and you don't want these swords. Actually by that time they probably had muskets and such, but that was just they just kept doing it over and over and over again, and each time it seems like it was a worse and worse thing morally speaking.

Yeah, for sure, there are, believe it or not, still some commons today. Not every single one of them was done away with. There's just a handful though. In Laxton, apparently in North Nottinghamshire, they have an open field system. They have three fields that they never enclosed and they are divided into strips just like the old days and farmed by tenants of that manor. And there's also a guild called the Oxford Freemen who owned the town meadow of that city and they can, you know, they can pasture their cattle there and their horse and they can fish in the part of the Thames that runs alongside that I guess jointly owned or cared for meadow.

Yeah, so yeah, there are still places that survived. But enclosure itself is done in Great Britain. It's been done since the eighteen sixties. And the reason it came to an end was because those the middle class, the merchant class, who became wealthy in the cities, said hey, we want parkland, We want places to be able to go and like have picnics and stuff, and this enclosure is eating up that land, so we need to stop enclosure. And so they did. They created something called the Commons Preservation Society. They gained influence in Parliament, they gained support in parliament. There was an eighteen seventy six act called the Commons Act that said you can only enclose a piece of Great Britain if there's a public benefit of it, and that group, the Commons Preservation Society, eventually created the National Trust, which, now, chuck, here's the great twist of irony, protects the very same hedges that created enclosure in the first place, and prevent farmers who want to tear up those hedges from tearing them up because they're protected by old enclosure acts. Wow, amazing stuff. Huh yeah, you got anything else?

I got nothing else.

Well, let's say about fencing the comments or enclosure, and I think that means we've just teed up listener.

Now that's right. This is from Christina. Hey, guys, I was very interested in the episode and paganism, as I'm a Christian who's always had an interest in respect for paganism. I wanted to clarify some comments you made about Easter and its roots and paganism. Yes, it is true that many things we have about Easter are based on the pagan celebration of Ostara. However, we often focus on that to the neglect and misattribution of the influences of Judaism on Easter. In English and the Germanic languages, the holiday we call Easter was taken from the name Ostara. However, in the Roman Romance languages and many other languages, the name for that holiday is based on the Jewish Passover, which is when Jesus is death and resurrection is supposed to have taken place. In Spanish it is Pascua, In Italian and Catalan it is Pascua, etc. The time of the year is also based on Jewish Passover. It's a spring holiday, so when Christianity was moving through Western Europe, it did coincide with Ostara. But that's not why Easter takes place in the spring. The bunnies and eggs and sun Sybolism are all pagan, but let's not ignore Christianity's origins out of Judaism and its influences on the day.

Man, that's a great email. Who's that from?

That's great? That's from Christina. She says, thanks a lot for what you do. I listen a lot to a lot of true crime, but I am happy that I still have you, guys and stuff you missed in history class. Nice our compatriots Hallian Tracy to listen to now that my baby is learning to talk and I need to listen to less murder and more family friendly content.

Yeah, we are pretty family friendly, aren't we.

Hey, we try to be not We do our best.

So thanks christ And that raised something that I realized we didn't mention when we were talking about evidence of pagan roots still around today. Our days of the week are almost all rooted in paganism, like Thursday. Thursday, that's where that came from. Saturday is Saturn'sday, like all of the days of our week come from pagan gods. Essentially, isn't that neat goats head Day? Yeah? Did you say goats head Day?

Yeah, which became Monday.

It's good stuff, buddy. Well, thanks again, Christina. If you want to be like Christina and send us in the email, especially a great one like that, you can send it off to stuff podcast adiheartradio dot com.

Stuff you Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.

Stuff You Should Know

If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD,  
Social links
Follow podcast
Recent clips
Browse 2,587 clip(s)