Did Nero really play the fiddle while Rome burned?

Published Jul 21, 2008, 3:44 PM

In A.D. 64, a great fire consumed Rome for six days and seven nights. Some rumors speculated that Nero set the fire, and even played a fiddle as the city burned. Check out our HowStuffWorks article to learn if this is fact or fiction.

Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

Welcome to Stuff You Missed in History Class from how Stuff Works dot com. Hello and welcome to the podcast. I'm editor Candice Skipson, joined by Curious like a cat staff right, Josh Clark. How's it going, Josh Rare Candice Rare. Um, I can't sing the lyrics quite as fast as the incomparable Billy Joel. But we are kind of wondering who started the fire? And back in eight six Rome was burning. Yes, it was a bad burn too. I think half of the citizens of Rome, which was pretty expansive at the time, lost their homes. Yeah. Burn for six days and seven nights. About the city was destroyed. Yeah. There were fourteen districts to Rome at the time and only three were left intact, and most of the other ones that were birn were just totally leveled. It was a horrible fire. And at the time, the person running the show in Rome was the Emperor Nero, who was wildly unpopular. Um. I think people kind of perceived him as a distracted leader. Um. He seemed kind of Namby Pamby From the research I did, he he just didn't really seem like a He was no Alexander. Let's just put it like that, Okay, fair enough, And there were actually rumors that he started the fire on purpose because he didn't like the way that the city looked and he wanted to rebuild it to his own esthetic standards. Yeah yeah, And you know, once people start throwing rumors like that around, you're in big trouble. But one of the other accusations that um I came across when I was researching the Roman Fire of sixty four um was that Nero played the fiddle while Rome burned, which is just seems mad, uh, And I've heard it before, but I'm asking you what is it fact or is that fiction? That's fiction. We're not quite sure where this idea came from. I mean, the idea of a city leader sitting around in his palace, you know, um plucking the strings of his instrument while his city's residents became homeless and utterly distraught. Again is just very sad and tragic. And we know for a fact that he did play a string instrument, but it wasn't the fiddle, and that actually wasn't invented until fifteen years after the event anyway, So that blows a story right out of the water. But there are historical accounts from Tacitus that show neuro Is actually present at the burning, and he was coordinating firefighting efforts, he was housing the homeless and his own gardens, and he was trying to get food available at a discount to the city's residents. But despite all of this, he still didn't do a very good job trying to coordinate the raised city as it were. Yeah, but even though he did try something, that's that in stark contradiction of the image, the public image he had, So at least he tried something right. He tried, but then he tried to blame it on the Christians too and persecuted them horribly, and he became even more unpopular when the Senate declared him a public enemy. And then his own soldiers started to revolt, and he realized that things were going really downhill. So four years after the fire, he took his own life. He stabbed himself in the throat. Indeed, so Nero was a ritual zero, and you can read more about him, and in Nero really played the fiddle while Rome burn on half stuff works dot Com. We're more on this than thousands of other topics because at how stuff works dot Com let us know what you think. Send an email to podcast at how stuff works dot com.

Stuff You Missed in History Class

Join Holly and Tracy as they bring you the greatest and strangest Stuff You Missed In History Class  
Social links
Follow podcast
Recent clips
Browse 2,478 clip(s)