Ron Klasko and Dan Lundy, both partners with Klasko Immigration Law Partners, talk with Anu Nair about a major litigation victory on which they were co-counsel. The litigation is significant because USCIS had put restrictions on the EB-5 regional center program that went beyond what Congress intended when it reinstated the program in March 2022, which would have killed the program for years.

Anu Nair asks Ron Klasko and Dan Lundy to explain the importance and the details of the settlement and what it means for regional centers and investors moving forward:
Why was the litigation necessary to reopen the program?
What are the terms of the litigation settlement?
Are all the regional centers active again?
What is the difference between the forms I-956 and the I-956F?
What documents can investors use now to file their petitions?
What is the likelihood of issues with regional center recertification?
Will there be any deference given to previously approved regional centers and projects?
What happens to investors if their regional centers don’t continue in the program?
What more communication will the EB-5 industry have with USCIS in the future?

Thank you to  our clients, who were plaintiffs in this litigation: EB-5 Capital, CanAm Enterprises, Civitas Capital Group, Golden Gate Global, Pine State Regional Center, and IIUSA. Without their intervention, the EB-5 regional center program would still be inactive today.

Please email us at podcast@klaskolaw.com with any questions you have on this topic.

Speakers on this episode are:
 Ronald Klasko
Daniel B. Lundy
Anu Nair

Stay connected with us:
Follow us on LinkedIn, Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and WeChat
Sign up for newsletter and email updates
Schedule a consultation here.

Ron Klasko and Dan Lundy, both partners with Klasko Immigration Law Partners, talk with Anu Nair about a major litigation victory on which they were co-counsel. The litigation is significant because USCIS had put restrictions on the EB-5 regional center program that went beyond what Congress intended when it reinstated the program in March 2022, which would have killed the program for years.
Anu Nair asks Ron Klasko and Dan Lundy to explain the importance and the details of the settlement and what it means for regional centers and investors moving forward:
<ol>
<li>Why was the litigation necessary to reopen the program?</li>
<li>What are the terms of the litigation settlement?</li>
<li>Are all the regional centers active again?</li>
<li>What is the difference between the forms I-956 and the I-956F?</li>
<li>What documents can investors use now to file their petitions?</li>
<li>What is the likelihood of issues with regional center recertification?</li>
<li>Will there be any deference given to previously approved regional centers and projects?</li>
<li>What happens to investors if their regional centers don’t continue in the program?</li>
<li>What more communication will the EB-5 industry have with USCIS in the future?</li>
</ol>
Thank you to  our clients, who were plaintiffs in this litigation: <a href="https://www.eb5capital.com/">EB-5 Capital</a>, <a href="https://www.canamenterprises.com/">CanAm Enterprises</a>, <a href="https://www.civitascapital.com/">Civitas Capital Group</a>, <a href="https://www.3gfund.com/">Golden Gate Global</a>, <a href="https://pinestateregionalcenter.com/">Pine State Regional Center</a>, and <a href="https://iiusa.org/">IIUSA</a>. Without their intervention, the EB-5 regional center program would still be inactive today.
Please email us at <a href="mailto:podcast@klaskolaw.com">podcast@klaskolaw.com</a> with any questions you have on this topic.
Speakers on this episode are:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.klaskolaw.com/team-member/h-ronald-klasko/"> Ronald Klasko</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.klaskolaw.com/team-member/daniel-b-lundy/">Daniel B. Lundy</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.klaskolaw.com/team-member/anusree-nair/">Anu Nair</a></li>
</ul>
Stay connected with us:
<ul>
<li>Follow us on <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/klaskoimmigration/">LinkedIn</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/KlaskoLaw">Twitter</a>, <a href="https://www.instagram.com/klaskoimmigrationlaw/">Instagram</a>, <a href="https://www.facebook.com/klaskoimmigrationlaw/">Facebook</a>, and <a href="http://www.klaskolaw.com/chinese-news-events/weibo/">WeChat</a></li>
<li>Sign up for <a href="https://www.klaskolaw.com/contact-us/subscribe-updates/">newsletter and email updates</a></li>
<li>Schedule a consultation <a href="https://www.klaskolaw.com/contact-us/schedule-a-consultation/">here</a>.</li>
</ul>

Welcome to Statutes of Liberty: An Immigration Podcast by Klasko Immigration Law Partners. 

The United States is many things: a great melting pot, a nation of immigrants, a land of opportunity. Millions have journeyed here seeking freedom and the chance for a better life. Belief in the American ideal means providing opportunities for everyone, regardless of race or birthplace, to achieve their highest potential. 

Join us as we unravel the ins and outs of American immigration policy, from the issues of today to the historic basis for laws already in place.

Statutes of Liberty

Join Klasko Immigration Law Partners and Anu Nair in this podcast, Statutes of Liberty, as we unravel the ins and outs of American immigration policy, from the issues of today to the historic basis for laws already in place.

Ron Klasko and Dan Lundy, both partners with Klasko Immigration Law Partners, talk with Anu Nair about a major litigation victory on which they were co-counsel. The litigation is significant because USCIS had put restrictions on the EB-5 regional center program that went beyond what Congress intended when it reinstated the program in March 2022, which would have killed the program for years.  Anu Nair asks Ron Klasko and Dan Lundy to explain the importance and the details of the settlement and what it means for regional centers and investors moving forward:  1.	Why was the litigation necessary to reopen the program? 2.	What are the terms of the litigation settlement? 3.	Are all the regional centers active again? 4.	What is the difference between the forms I-956 and the I-956F? 5.	What documents can investors use now to file their petitions? 6.	What is the likelihood of issues with regional center recertification? 7.	Will there be any deference given to previously approved regional centers and projects? 8.	What happens to investors if their regional centers don’t continue in the program? 9.	What more communication will the EB-5 industry have with USCIS in the future? Thank you to  our clients, who were plaintiffs in this litigation: EB-5 Capital, CanAm Enterprises, Civitas Capital Group, Golden Gate Global, Pine State Regional Center, and IIUSA. Without their intervention, the EB-5 regional center program would still be inactive today.  Please email us at podcast@klaskolaw.com with any questions you have on this topic. Speakers on this episode are: •	H. Ronald Klasko •	Daniel B. Lundy •	Anu Nair Stay connected with us: •	Follow us on LinkedIn, Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and WeChat •	Sign up for newsletter and email updates •	Schedule a consultation here.

Advertisement