13. This week we are back in a Santa Ana courtroom for our front row trial coverage of Rachel Buffett’s accessory to murder trial.  Matt Murphy has prosecuted his case for nearly a week and is ready for his closing arguments.  David Medina, Rachel’s defense counsel feels so confident he has presented plenty of reasonable doubt in the trial, that he doesn’t put on a single witness.  Court spectators wondered whether Rachel herself would take the stand in her defense.  After all, not more than a month before the trial, Rachel was presented an offer that included pleading guilty to a misdemeanor with no jail time.  She turned it down and expressed wanting her day in court.  So why did she tell the judge she didn’t think it was necessary she take the stand?  Perhaps it will all make sense as we listen in to both Matt Murphy and David Medina’s closing arguments to jurors.  Our Sleuth guest, Daniel Wozniak’s defense counsel Scott Sanders, returns to analyze the final summations from both counsel. 

 Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

<p>13. This week we are back in a Santa Ana courtroom for our front row trial coverage of Rachel Buffett’s accessory to murder trial.  Matt Murphy has prosecuted his case for nearly a week and is ready for his closing arguments.  David Medina, Rachel’s defense counsel feels so confident he has presented plenty of reasonable doubt in the trial, that he doesn’t put on a single witness.  Court spectators wondered whether Rachel herself would take the stand in her defense.  After all, not more than a month before the trial, Rachel was presented an offer that included pleading guilty to a misdemeanor with no jail time.  She turned it down and expressed wanting her day in court.  So why did she tell the judge she didn’t think it was necessary she take the stand?  Perhaps it will all make sense as we listen in to both Matt Murphy and David Medina’s closing arguments to jurors.  Our Sleuth guest, Daniel Wozniak’s defense counsel Scott Sanders, returns to analyze the final summations from both counsel. </p><p> </p> Learn more about your ad-choices at <a href="https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com">https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com</a>

Like a real-life Phantom of the Opera, Southern California local theater actor Daniel Wozniak lured his victims, Sam Herr and Julie Kibuishi, in the attic of a theatre, where he would kill and dismember them before performing on stage the very same night. As of now, Wozniak alone sits on San Quentin's death row. But is there room for more? Is Rachel Buffett, a former Disney Princess and Dan's ex fiancee, an accomplice in the murderous scheme? Simultaneous to the launch of SLEUTH, today began Rachel's trial for accessory after the fact . Will justice prevail or will she completely walk free from her role in the crimes. Should she have been charged with murder? Investigative journalist and host of Sleuth Linda Sawyer, follows this story till it's ultimate conclusion, so that the victim's families finally learn the whole picture of what happened to their loved ones.

Sleuth

13. Attorneys Closing Arguments resume in Santa Ana Superior Court where Rachel Buffett's Accessory to Murder Trial continues.

https://api.omny.fm/orgs/e73c998e-6e60-432f-8610-ae210140c5b1/clips/427d1d92-860f-460e-9210-ae27018051bb/transcript

Advertisement