I’ve done my best to avoid the headlines over the last few weeks, but Scott Robertson being booted from the All Blacks snapped me back.  

I feel for him. Just as I did for Ian Foster, last time around. These guys are in high profile jobs, coaching high performance athletes. All top coaches know it’s a perilous business. But to be cut after just two years in the job, and after a period of inconsistent and occasionally poor but not absolutely catastrophic results, will leave Razor and his keenest supporters forever wondering what might have been.  

I don’t have any inside running on the review or the process that led David Kirk and NZ Rugby to swing the axe. But it occurs to me that one of Scott Robertson’s biggest errors was one of his first major decisions in the role, and I’ve been wondering to what extent it set the tone for his tenure.  

June 24, 2024. The All Blacks were preparing for their mid-year tests against England and Fiji, and Scott Robertson named the man who would captain the All Blacks.  

I was stunned when he made that announcement. I said as much on this show. Not because I don’t think Scott Barrett is an incredible rugby player. Not because I don’t think he’s an outstanding leader and he isn’t deserving of the All Blacks captaincy. But because for anyone with even a passing interest in the game and the team, there was a much more obvious candidate hiding in plain sight. Robertson said he had an established relationship with Barrett from their time at the Crusaders. Very well, but surely coaching the national team meant other factors should be prioritised? Surely getting the best was more important than sticking with what you know?! And surely winning the trust of the playing group begins with empowering their obvious leader? 

Captaincy carries different responsibilities in different sports. In cricket, it’s a significant tactical burden. Every ball your team bowls, you’re theoretically making a decision. In football, netball, and rugby, a little less. You’re not setting fields or choosing bowlers. You have a game plan or a formation, but apart from the odd decision on penalties and a well-timed word to the ref, most of the game more or less happens in the moment. It puts a different kind of demand on leadership. One that is less overtly tactical, and focuses on the sort of person whose play, and behaviour will unite his teammates, inspire their play, and set a standard for the team.  

And come on, I say this as a lifelong Canterbury fan, does anyone in this country think Ardie Savea isn’t that man? If you were picking 15 starting players for the All Blacks, in order of value to the team, there is surely not a single rugby fan who wouldn’t pick Ardie first, almost every time. If you were picking a World XV, he’s maybe the only current All Black who’d be a shoo-in. The man is an incredible physical force. He has a cool head. He’s tactically as good as anyone else. And above all, he oozes mana.  

And the frustrating thing is, we can all see it. You can see it in the haka, or when he’s charging with those high knees or winning a turnover. You can see it in the way opposition plays like Siya Kolisi embrace him. You can see it when a side like Moana Pasifika goes from averaging 12th place in its first three seasons to finishing seventh under his leadership, with more points than the previous two season combined.  

I think if we were to go back ten years, to the Whitelock-McCaw-Smith-Smith-Carter era, you could argue that our talent was so much better than in most other rugby playing nations, the captaincy perhaps didn’t matter as much. But now that the World has caught up, it beggars belief that Razor didn’t make Ardie Savea captain. That he didn’t see the leadership and esteem that was jumping out of the television. And what message did that send to the team?  

I don’t know what happened. But maybe Scott Robertson’s mistake was that he thought by emulating his Crusaders setup as much as possible, he would replicate the success. But he needed to go further. He needed to take greater risks and forge new relationships. And I think that one decision had a huge, outsized impact. And now, having worked for so many years to win the job, just like that, Razor’s opportunity is gone. 

I’ve done my best to avoid the headlines over the last few weeks, but Scott Robertson being booted from the All Blacks snapped me back. &nbsp;
I feel for him. Just as I did for Ian Foster, last time around. These guys are in high profile jobs, coaching high performance athletes. All top coaches know it’s a perilous business. But to be cut after just two years in the job, and after a period of inconsistent and occasionally poor but not absolutely catastrophic results, will leave Razor and his keenest supporters forever wondering what might have been. &nbsp;
I don’t have any inside running on the review or the process that led David Kirk and NZ Rugby to swing the axe. But it occurs to me that one of Scott Robertson’s biggest errors was one of his first major decisions in the role, and I’ve been wondering to what extent it set the tone for his tenure. &nbsp;
June 24, 2024. The All Blacks were preparing for their mid-year tests against England and Fiji, and Scott Robertson named the man who would captain the All Blacks. &nbsp;
I was stunned when he made that announcement. I said as much on this show. Not because I don’t think Scott Barrett is an incredible rugby player. Not because I don’t think he’s an outstanding leader and he isn’t deserving of the All Blacks captaincy. But because for anyone with even a passing interest in the game and the team, there was a much more obvious candidate hiding in plain sight. Robertson said he had an established relationship with Barrett from their time at the Crusaders. Very well, but surely coaching the national team meant other factors should be prioritised? Surely getting the best was more important than sticking with what you know?! And surely winning the trust of the playing group begins with empowering their obvious leader?&nbsp;
Captaincy carries different responsibilities in different sports. In cricket, it’s a significant tactical burden. Every ball your team bowls, you’re theoretically making a decision. In football, netball, and rugby, a little less. You’re not setting fields or choosing bowlers. You have a game plan or a formation, but apart from the odd decision on penalties and a well-timed word to the ref, most of the game more or less happens in the moment. It puts a different kind of demand on leadership. One that is less overtly tactical, and focuses on the sort of person whose play, and behaviour will unite his teammates, inspire their play, and set a standard for the team. &nbsp;
And come on, I say this as a lifelong Canterbury fan, does anyone in this country think Ardie Savea isn’t that man? If you were picking 15 starting players for the All Blacks, in order of value to the team, there is surely not a single rugby fan who wouldn’t pick Ardie first, almost every time. If you were picking a World XV, he’s maybe the only current All Black who’d be a shoo-in. The man is an incredible physical force. He has a cool head. He’s tactically as good as anyone else. And above all, he oozes mana. &nbsp;
And the frustrating thing is, we can all see it. You can see it in the haka, or when he’s charging with those high knees or winning a turnover. You can see it in the way opposition plays like Siya Kolisi embrace him. You can see it when a side like Moana Pasifika goes from averaging 12th place in its first three seasons to finishing seventh under his leadership, with more points than the previous two season combined. &nbsp;
I think if we were to go back ten years, to the Whitelock-McCaw-Smith-Smith-Carter era, you could argue that our talent was so much better than in most other rugby playing nations, the captaincy perhaps didn’t matter as much. But now that the World has caught up, it beggars belief that Razor didn’t make Ardie Savea captain. That he didn’t see the leadership and esteem that was jumping out of the television. And what message did that send to the team? &nbsp;
I don’t know what happened. But maybe Scott Robertson’s mistake was that he thought by emulating his Crusaders setup as much as possible, he would replicate the success. But he needed to go further. He needed to take greater risks and forge new relationships. And I think that one decision had a huge, outsized impact. And now, having worked for so many years to win the job, just like that, Razor’s opportunity is gone.&nbsp;

Jack Tame’s crisp perspective, style and enthusiasm makes for refreshing and entertaining Saturday morning radio on Newstalk ZB.

News, sport, books, music, gardens and celebrities – what better way to spend your Saturdays?

Jack Tame’s crisp perspective, style and enthusiasm makes for refreshing and entertaining Saturday morning radio on Newstalk ZB. News, sport, books, music, gardens and celebrities – what better way to spend your Saturdays?

Jack Tame’s crisp perspective, style and enthusiasm makes for refreshing and entertaining Saturday morning radio on Newstalk ZB.News, sport, books, music, gardens and celebrities – what better way to spend your Saturdays?

Saturday Morning with Jack Tame

Jack Tame: One of Scott Robertson's biggest errors was one of his first major decisions

https://api.omny.fm/orgs/7784f840-c291-422a-924b-ad9000bbad71/clips/7eb75417-e724-42b6-aeba-b3d4015b2212/transcript