Candidate for Aurora City Council, Danielle Jurinski is in studio to talk about the direction in Aurora and Joe Biden's gun speech.  Then David Harsanyi returns to react to the Biden speech on guns too.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ays12pp8OP8

 

Candidate for Aurora City Council, Danielle Jurinski is in studio to talk about the direction in Aurora and Joe Biden's gun speech.&nbsp; Then David Harsanyi returns to react to the Biden speech on guns too.
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ays12pp8OP8">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ays12pp8OP8</a>
&nbsp;

The Voice of The People! Saturday 9AM-1PM

The Voice of The People! Saturday 9AM-1PM

Peter Boyles Show Podcast

Peter Boyles Show

Peter Boyles June 24 8am

JANUARY 31, 2026 HOUR 4:

In the last hour of the show, Peter Boyles keeps digging into a story that just doesn’t feel right. The details don’t quite line up, and the more it gets repeated like it’s settled, the more questions come up.

Callers jump in with their own takes, doubts, and frustrations. Peter pushes back at times, agrees at others, and keeps bringing it back to the same point: what do we actually know, and what are we just assuming?

It turns into a pretty honest back-and-forth about narratives, missing information, and why it’s okay to be skeptical instead of just going along with whatever you’re told.

Unscripted, imperfect, and very much talk radio.

 

JANUARY 31, 2026 HOUR 4:
In the last hour of the show, Peter Boyles keeps digging into a story that just doesn&rsquo;t feel right. The details don&rsquo;t quite line up, and the more it gets repeated like it&rsquo;s settled, the more questions come up.
Callers jump in with their own takes, doubts, and frustrations. Peter pushes back at times, agrees at others, and keeps bringing it back to the same point: what do we actually know, and what are we just assuming?
It turns into a pretty honest back-and-forth about narratives, missing information, and why it&rsquo;s okay to be skeptical instead of just going along with whatever you&rsquo;re told.
Unscripted, imperfect, and very much talk radio.
&nbsp;

Callers Push Back as Peter Boyles Picks Apart the Story

JANUARY 31, 2026 HOUR 3: 

In this hour, Peter Boyles digs into the latest Epstein document release and explains why it only deepens his belief that Epstein was murdered, not suicidal. Callers weigh in with theories about intelligence agencies, power elites, and why so many big names keep circling the same story.

The conversation then shifts — again — to the 2020 election. Listeners argue mail-in ballots, media bias, and local voting anomalies point to something bigger. Peter pushes back hard, drawing a clear distinction between suspicion and evidence, and refuses to call the election stolen without proof.

A tense, emotional hour that hits Epstein, elections, media trust, and the growing divide between belief and facts in American politics.

JANUARY 31, 2026 HOUR 3:&nbsp;
In this hour, Peter Boyles digs into the latest Epstein document release and explains why it only deepens his belief that Epstein was murdered, not suicidal. Callers weigh in with theories about intelligence agencies, power elites, and why so many big names keep circling the same story.
The conversation then shifts &mdash; again &mdash; to the 2020 election. Listeners argue mail-in ballots, media bias, and local voting anomalies point to something bigger. Peter pushes back hard, drawing a clear distinction between suspicion and evidence, and refuses to call the election stolen without proof.
A tense, emotional hour that hits Epstein, elections, media trust, and the growing divide between belief and facts in American politics.

Epstein Files, Election Claims, and the Line Between Belief and Proof

JANUARY 31, 2026 HOUR 2: Peter Boyles opens the phones and tackles one of the most explosive stories in politics — the latest Epstein-related allegations and their sudden reemergence in the media.

Why now?
If the evidence were real, why hasn’t it already detonated?
And why does this story feel more like a political weapon than a search for truth?

Boyles connects patterns from history, questions media motives, and lets callers weigh in as the conversation moves from Epstein to Trump, trust in institutions, and whether the public is being manipulated yet again.

This is unfiltered talk radio — skeptical, unscripted, and unwilling to accept narratives at face value.

 

JANUARY 31, 2026 HOUR 2: Peter Boyles opens the phones and tackles one of the most explosive stories in politics &mdash; the latest Epstein-related allegations and their sudden reemergence in the media.
Why now? If the evidence were real, why hasn&rsquo;t it already detonated? And why does this story feel more like a political weapon than a search for truth?
Boyles connects patterns from history, questions media motives, and lets callers weigh in as the conversation moves from Epstein to Trump, trust in institutions, and whether the public is being manipulated yet again.
This is unfiltered talk radio &mdash; skeptical, unscripted, and unwilling to accept narratives at face value.
&nbsp;

Peter Boyles June 24 8am

In 1 playlist(s)

Peter Boyles Show

Social links

Follow podcast

Recent clips