Nerd Sesh x Hoop Venue - Are Mavs a real threat to Thunder? Is Wemby Top 10? How can Nuggets improve?

Published Dec 11, 2024, 10:50 PM

The nerds are joined by Tyler Britton (Hoop Venue) to discuss whether Luka Doncic & the Dallas Mavericks are a true threat to Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and the Oklahoma City Thunder after last night’s NBA Cup Battle, dive into how the Denver Nuggets need to improve around Nikola Jokic, and debate whether or not Victor Wembanyama is already a Top 10 player. They also discuss whether Ja Morant or Jaren Jackson Jr. is the Memphis Grizzlies’ best player, lay out why trading Jimmy Butler may be harder than you think, and debate if the Phoenix Suns or Golden State Warriors are the best team in the Pacific Division.  

Timestamps

00:00:23 - Where does Dallas rank in the West?

00:17:38 - What do the Nuggets need to do to be legitimate title contenders?

00:39:33 - How many player over Wemby?

01:05:54 - Who is the Grizzlies’ best player?

01:18:05 - Jimmy Butler trade destinations

01:31:42 - Who is the best team in the Pacific division?

#Volume

The volume No Oh my god, how could he do that?

By Charles Darwin. The Nerves is where it's at.

Welcome everybody back in Herd set.

As always, I'm Barson wherever in alongside the is Logan Camden and today we are joined by a special guest friend of the show who we've had on a few times before, Tyler aka Hoop Venue, who makes some of the best basketball content out there, tons of awesome film breakdowns on YouTube and now. Tyler is a part of the podcasting community like ourselves. He is an esteemed podcaster hosting the Hoop Venue podcast with Sean Davis, so everybody make sure to go check out all his stuff after we are done talking ball with him here. Tyler, very excited to have you on again. How are you doing today.

Yeah, man, I'm doing great. Appreciate the invite. I'm excited to talk hoops with you guys. I think the last time I was on the show is when I got diced up in Trivia, so this is a good like good redemption for me with the Nerd Sash fan base.

So I'm excited to be here.

I mean, you came with the King man, it was bold. You issued a challenge and listen, I answered, but yeah, today we'll be back to just talk in some basketball. No competition, but we've seen some great competition on the basketball court. Actually, because we got the NBA Cup going on right now. We had two games yesterday. We're into the knockout round, and I think definitely the more significant one because of the two teams who were playing was MAVs Thunder, and it offered us a little bit of insight into a potential Western Conference Finals this year and obviously a rematch of last year's Western Conference semi finals. So Tyler, we'll start with you. How close do you think Dallas is to Oka see as a contender?

Yeah, this is fresh on my mind because we actually just talked about this in our last episode. I kind of went on a ten minute little sermon on the MAVs and I talked about how I believe they have two superpowers. I think their first superpower is the fact that they have forty eight minutes of starter level basketball at the center position. Most teams don't have that. I think I went through all thirty and they were like four or five. Problem is, OKAC is one of the teams that does have that. When they have Chett and Hartenstein in the lineup. The other superpower I believe is that the MAVs have two all NBA level guards or all NBA level offensive players at the engine position, so they have forty eight minutes of that as well. The only team that I would say matches both of those is Cleveland with Mitchell and Garland and then Mobley and Allen. But the problem that I have with Dallas is I think they lack the ability to construct really really good three and D lineups in the way that like Boston completely mastered. Like I think Dallas's shooters are not defenders, and their defenders are players that have to prove they can be trusted as shooters, like PJ. Washington, Naji Marshall, And so for me, it's tough because I think OKAC has a few guys that I I don't trust as shooters yet, Like I need to see it from Lou Dorton, need to see it from Cason Wallace, need to see it from Cruso. But with J Dubb's defensive leap, now with him and Chet, they have two elite, elite defensive players that can reliably shoot, and I think that's kind of what pushes them. So when I did my power rankings, I kind of felt like Boston and OKAC are kind of in a tier of their own, but I think Dallas kind of heads tier two.

Like I don't think Dallas is far.

I could see them beating OKAC in a playoff series, but I do think there's a sizeable gap there between, just like the depth of the two way ability on the roster.

That's interesting. See you have Dallas over Denver.

I do have Dallas over de I just moved on that last week. I think my final list was Boston, OKC, Cleveland, Dallas, Memphis I think was my top five.

Wow, Okay, that's fascinating. I do agree with you on the superpowers point though. I think that's a great point because even when they were down last night against Oklahoma City, it seemed like it was an almost insurmountable lead. Dallas just goes on this run where they cut the lead to eight, right, Obviously they end up losing this one. You need Luca to be way better. But I think the Mavericks are three for me out West, just behind Denver. I consider them to be legitimate championship contenders, and I don't know if I'm as concerned about the lineup issues, I agree with you, Tyler. I think that there are teams that do it better than Dallas because they are better two way guys. But I think Luca and Kyrie can be very similar to what they did in this run last year. I think those guys can pull their weight enough with the surrounding pieces. I think that they are so good with their anchors on both sides of the floor, like you mentioned, with Luca and Kyrie offensively, with Gafford and Lively defensively. I think some things would have to break their way, but I could see it. I think Dallas is good enough to make another run this year. I wholeheartedly consider them a contender.

I consider them a contender too, and I think that they are within shouting distance of Oka. See They're definitely not an equal, but I do see a world in which.

They could win that series.

I think it's a long shot, but I don't think it's impossible, and I'm gonna agree with you, Tyler. I do have Dallas as my number two team in the West now, and one of my big takes of the offseason was Denver's the second best team in the West still Dallas is third until we see a significantly better version of Jamal Murray. I just don't think that I can continue to uphold that take. Like the depth in Dallas is so excellent. You mentioned the forty eight minutes of quality center play, the two Star one Superstar Creator aspect, and I do really like their role players.

Now.

I don't think that they're perfect role players, but Naji Marshall has just been an absolute home run for them. I do really like PJ. I just think they're a better basketball team right now. But compared to OKAC, I think that there are a lot of key differences compared to last year that have swung an Okac's favor, both when we look at these teams in a vacuum and when we look at the specific matchup, because obviously Dallas beat Okay last year, but some of those key changes. Number One, last year, Dallas was really able to dictate the glass in that matchup because OKAC was the worst rebounding team in basketball. Arguably, Dallas was basically plus three per game on the offensive glass in that series. With the introduction of Isaiah Hartenstein, I just don't think that that's gonna hold. And in fact, yesterday it was OKCE that dominated the offensive glass.

They were plus ten.

So Hartenstein is just such a difference maker physically on the glass. I think that that dynamic has totally changed this year number two. Last year, OKC players not named SGA made thirty percent of their threes in that series, and as a team they made eleven threes per game. And that wasn't just problematic because they were leaving points on the board from beyond the arc. It also totally changed how Dallas was able to guard Oka.

See right.

We tend to think of it as sort of the giddy problem, where you can just stick a center on him on him and totally roam off so you have the paint loaded up at all times. But it was much deeper than that because almost the entire OKC reporting cast struggle to make outside shots. So the low man was constantly roaming and being super impactful as a help defender, keeping SGA and Jadub from getting clean looks at the rim, forcing them to live with a more mid range, heavy shot diet, and SGA was still able to kill it in that environment, but Jadub couldn't, and the OKC offense as a whole wasn't good enough.

Well.

Last night, Okase made twenty threes at a forty percent clip. So I'm not saying that this team is going to be consistently great in terms of outside shooting. In fact, I think if you have one question mark about OKC, especially when I hold them up against Boston viewing them as the two top tier title contenders, it is can they keep up in that three point race? But they should absolutely be better than last year because I think they have a better shooting roster, and I also do think they did uncharacteristically struggle to shoot the ball in that series.

Last year. It was a really bad three point shooting series. Number three. Key factor that's changed.

I think that Jadab and Chet are both significantly better players than last year, and I expect them both to play much better. Jadab has taken that leap to just unassailable All Star. He's giving you twenty two, six and five on sixty percent true shooting. You mentioned the defensive leap he's taken. I think he's also clearly improved offensively. He's shooting fifty three percent from mid range this year, and I still think is one of the more underrated three level scores and just all around star impact basketball players on the planet. This guy does basically everything at a high level and then chit. This year is just like an entirely new beast. And I understand the raw numbers don't look crazy anymore, and obviously he's hurt right now, but I thought that he entered this year with a completely new level of confidence attacking off the bounce. He also had an uncharacteristically bad three point shooting last series against Dallas, and one thing that he struggled with against Dallas was they were able to switch everything and he couldn't punish mismatches right. And I still don't think he's gonna do that as like some sort of physical post player. But I just think when he's this confident as a driver, when he's this aggressive as an on ball scorer and scorer overall, I think that he can punish Dallas much more and just be a more consistent offensive presence. So they have a legitimate superstar in SGA who can go toe to toe with Luca and soundly outplayed him last night and outplayed him in their head to head series last year. I don't think he's better than Luca, but he has outplayed him over the last eight games that we've seen from them had to head. They've got two legitimate stars alongside him. Now, that's what I think Jadab and Chet have become, and I don't think they were that last year. They're better on the glass, they're better shooting. I love the skill sets of their role players. And I don't think there's a defense better built to guard Dallas than the Oklahoma City Thunder. First of all, I just don't think there's a better defense in the league. The fact that they're still comfortably the number one defense and they haven't had Chet for so long, and they haven't had Chet and Hartenstein on the floor together for a single minute in this regular season, Like that's incredible on its own, but also some of the specific components they have, In my opinion, the best Luca defender in basketball in lou Dort with just how physically he's able to play him. I think that they have the deep group of high level perimeter defenders in basketball. When you factor in Jada the menace that he is, Caeson Wallace, He's a menace. Caruso obviously is an elite perimeter defender. Sga is not necessarily purely perimeter impact with him, but a guy who can guard on the perimeter and is another clear plus defender. So when they're blitzing Kyrie and Luca, which they've done more than anybody in basketball, right, I mean, last year's series was literally just we're forcing the ball out of their hands and daring anybody else to make shots, and they did. PJ Washington especially did make shots. But when they are blitzing those guys, like hell, there is not a more pestering, more active, or a quicker.

Defense in the NBA.

And that applies in terms of both forcing those guys into turnovers making them uncomfortable, but also their ability to rotate and challenge these shooters, right Negate what should be clear advantages because they're just that fast and long and athletic and feisty, and now you mentioned Tyler, they have the forty eight awesome minutes of big play to match Dallas's strength there. I'm not saying that Dallas can't win that series, but I think it's a much longer path to victory. I really think that OKAC is an exceptional basketball team. I think Dallas is better than last year, but I think oka See is way way better than last year.

Totally agreed. Totally agreed.

So if there is a path to victory for Dallas, what are the key components to that in your guys eyes.

I think it starts with winning the shooting battle.

Like you said, like same thing as last year, Like they need the role players to be hitting their shots, and I think that actually would get rid of the concern that I have had with them, like the three and D thing, Like if Naji Marshall and PJ. Washington are hitting their threes, that's no longer really a factor because now you have the versatile three and D role player you're looking for. So I think it starts with that, and then I also think you're gonna need big scoring series from Kyrie Luca because Okayc's defense is just so suffocating and they force so many turnovers that when they get into that blitzing system you're talking about, it forces role players to make tough decisions, and in order to make decisions against that level of defense, you have to be just a super high level processor. That's what Luca's superhuman ability is, So you're gonna need him to really really zone in and honestly like it kind of sounds counterintuitive, but like you almost want more Luca ball dominance in a series like that because you need him to protect the ball and make the right reads.

Well, I think that's probably the biggest component. I think Luca has to soundly outplay SGA. What do you guys think about the scheme that Dallas implemented in the playoffs last year with Jason Kidd when they kept blitzing SGA. What do you do defensively against ok see? Do you guys still think that's the best avenue to slowing them down trying to get the ball out of his hands and force other guys to kill you.

Probably for now, I would say their rim protection is just so elite. But again, I think that it's going to be an issue of OKC is probably gonna shoot better this year, and I think it's harder to live with those defensive looks when you're rolling off of guys when they're knocking down those perimeter shots.

I think I think they should. What I would do personally is like similar to what Miami would do with Trey Young, where they would just really, really really aggressively sink into the gaps and take away the elbow drives. And basically try and force SGA into making skip passes, because I feel like if you want to point to one weakness with Shay, it would be like high level playmaking reads and that just goes to show how the lead of a player he is, if that's what you have to focus on. But I think like if you can force him into making tougher passes over the top of defenders sitting in the gaps, because Dallas has a lot of size, Like for all of Luca's flaws, He's huge, PJ. Washington's big, Nase, He's big. Clay even is pretty big. He's six seven, So like they have a ton of size that they can really sink in the gaps and just kind of force those guys into making tougher long range passes. I think would be the ideal coverage.

Well, I feel like that's more specifically what they did last year in the playoffs.

Here's right.

It wasn't a ton of blitzing on SGA's just Hey, you're gonna see multiple bodies in the paint on every drive and you're not going to be able to get deep into the teeth of the defense, and we are going to test your ability to make skip passes. And even though I thought Sja was more suspect as a decision maker and playmaker in the Pelican series, I actually thought he was quite good in that series against Dallas as a passer. I just thought the offense around him stagnated and the shot making wasn't there from the other guys, and the decision making wasn't there from the other guys. So I think that Dallas has a good formula to test Okase's offense. I just think they're a better offense. And I think if Sga plays better and Jadub plays better and Chet plays better specifically because Sga was already really good, but if those supporting offensive pieces are better and more capable as creators specifically, I think it's going to be really tough to beat that team. But I do think Dallas's path has to be Lucas absolutely the best player on the floor, and you talk about the massive scoring numbers that they're gonna need from him and Kyrie, I agree. I think Kyrie would pretty soundly have to outplay Ja. It's just hard because we know that OKAC is going to do everything they can to force the ball out of those guys' hands. To make them more playmakers than scorers, but not even playmakers where they are getting the assist right, get the ball out to a short roller and that guy has to make the decision things like that, where they're taking the offensive power out of their hands. I think that they need to win the shooting battle. As you said, Tyler, I think he probably need Okac to go cold. And this is just a take that I have with Dallas long term, and I'm interested in your guys thoughts. I think they should be starting Nausei Marshall, and I said this preseason. I thought they should have started Nausey over Clay. Not because I think that nause is necessarily a better player than Clay in a vacuum, although I think he has been this year because of how good he's been offensively and Clay hasn't been his best this year, but also because I think you're just best served having your best perimeter defender alongside the Luka Kyrie backcourt. Instead of saying, hey, we're gonna have a med defender out there in Clay, who's our third best offensive player, I think you're better off having nause to be able to take on those lead perimeter matchups and then stagger your minutes a little bit more. Where you have Kyrie and Clay out there on the floor together, you have Luca and Clay, but you don't necessarily need all three of them out there. And Nause's just been so good and specifically in this matchup, I feel like his asset that's so valuable is oksee is rotating so quickly and they're closing out so hard. I mean, this is a guy who can really attack off the catch, right. He's not a great shooter, but his ability to get into the lane and hit those floaters.

Or also to make a decision, he's a good passer.

I just think he's a very complete basketball player, and I think he more specifically fits the needs of that Dallas starting lineup, especially in this matchup, because I thought that Clay was kind of getting flumbayed by SGA when he was on him.

Yeah, I agree.

I think the biggest thing that you mentioned is the ability to attack and make decisions. I think Nause is significantly more efficient in his touches than Clay. So Clay has like the crazy value just from spacing and shooting alone movement, but I think in a series like that like, especially where Luke is going to be heavily played for forty feet, Kyrie is going to be constant pressure. You kind of need that other ball handler that can really just like alleviate the pressure, make the right decisions, get the offense set up properly. And I think that's what Nause offers, Like, I think he's a legitimately capable initiator and ball handler that kind of can diversify their offense in a way that Clay can't. And then, like you mentioned, they desperately need that defense, Like how are how else are you going to handle Shay and Jadub if one of those guys is seeing just a significantly weaker defender.

Yeah, I agree. And it's not like you're eliminating Clay from the lineup right, You're still gonna be giving him twenty to twenty five minutes to night, so you're still getting good value. I agree. I think it makes more sense to have Nause out there.

Well, we've talked about the top dogs out West. Let's talk about the other team that we hinted at earlier. It was certainly expected to be in these conversations before the year, at least I expected them to be but right now they're sitting at twelve and ten. They lost to the Washington Wizards a few days ago, which we haven't had a chance to talk about yet, and that is the Denver Nuggets. So Logan, I'll start with you on this one. What needs to change for Denver to look like true contenders?

I don't think a whole lot. I still have them as my number two team in the West. I have them over Dallas the most importantly. They have the best player in the league, Nicole Jokic, is the best scorer of the best playmaker in basketball, and arguably the best rebounder. And a lot of the variables I think you may have had questions about with Denver coming into this season have been really positive. I love how Christian Brown has come in and fit in and plays his role. Over the last ten He's given you fifteen to five and two really efficiently. The guy is a dog defensively and he does his job offensively. I think he's fit in really well here. I've liked how Russell Westbrook has looked. Russell was probably my biggest question mark about this team, and he's gotten better consistently as the season has gone along, and I think Michael Porter Junior has looked a lot better. The big difference, like you've mentioned during the Dallas segment, Carson, Jamal Murray just needs to look like championship Jamal Murray. During the title run, Jamal Murray was giving you twenty six points, six rebounders, six rebounds, and seven assists a night on forty seven percent from the field and thirty seven percent from deep. I mean, that's just a completely different basketball player when the playoffs come along. And Jokic deserved all the credit in the world because that was one of the greatest championship runs I think from any player in NBA history. It was a historic championship run. But Nicola jokicch couldn't have done that without Jamal Murray hitting all these big shots and coming up clutch in every single big spot. That to me, is the only difference. Like, like, if we were living in a perfect world, I would love if they had like an impactful two way back up big Tyler. You were talking about the forty eight minutes of quality big play. The Nuggets benches always sucked. Everybody knows that, But you know, the ideal guy is kind of like who Oklahoma City added to their rotation. The perfect fit because a guy like Isaiah Hartenside, who could come in and give you twenty to twenty five a night. Everybody points to him, but he is hard and time, would be a perfect fit off the bench, right, and they.

Had him they did.

They also had jehoff well and big Nrk true and of course well they could have chosen Nerk.

Over Yokis, so at least they got yeah a spot.

Yeah yeah, so ideally they'd have that. But I think the biggest component to the Nuggets figuring out their championship recipe again is just Jamal Murray playing at that level in the playoffs.

Uh.

The reason, though, I want to be clear about something, The reason the Nuggets are still number two to me in the West, we've seen the championship formula work before. But also it just the biggest component is just I have so much more faith in Jokic than I do Luca right now, That's the reason that they're number two is the gap between those two guys. Jokic is just so far and away that the best player around the planet, respect to Giannis, but to me, Jokic is heading shoulders the best guy on the planet. And that's most importantly why they're number two.

To me, Yeah, I pretty much agree with every everything you said there. Like I think people overstate how much of a difference there is between this roster and the twenty twenty three roster. Like KCP has essentially been replaced by Christian Brown. Say what you will about what that difference makes. I'd actually argue Christian Brown right now is playing better than casep ever did with the Nuggets. I don't think he's the same type of floor spacer or off ball mover, but he replaces that value in other areas, like especially like as a downhill presence in transition, playing off of cuts like Christian Brown has just been awesome. And then you kind of replace Bruce Brown with Russell Westbrook. Again it's a different look, but Russell Westbrook and Jokic have had an incredible dynamic. Like I said this going into the season, I was like, Westbrook's maybe his best asset over the last few years has been the way he creates short mid range opportunities for his bigs like Zoo, Robin Lopez, all of those guys just had a significant lead to their short mid range attempts. When Westbrook was playing pick and roll with them, and I think a big reason why we're seeing Yokic ever's thirty two points a game is he's getting three or more three or four more points off of these bunnies from Westbrook. So I think there's a lot to love with the roster. They've kept their core four together from the championship. I think Julian Strather's looked really good. I think Peyton Watson's been phenomenal defensively. I just simply agree it comes down to ken Jamal Murray get back to that level. And this start for Murray isn't exactly uncharacteristic. He's done this before, so there is still some faith in that he can get back to that level. Some interesting numbers that I was thinking about, like in the championship season, they started fourteen to eight. Right now they're twelve to ten and Jokic missed three games. I think, so they could very well have the exact same record as they did in their championship year. Also, the Nuggets in that championship year had a plus twelve net rating with Jokic on the floor. They have a plus eleven net rating with Yokic on the floor. This season pretty much the same caliber of team when Jokic is on the court. And the final thing for me is I don't worry as much about the forty eight minutes of high level center play from the Nuggets, just because we've seen in the playoffs Jokic is gonna play forty one forty two minutes a game, and he's gonna do that well. And I think what makes the Nuggets such a tough out is that, like when Yokic is playing forty two minutes, in order to knock them out, you pretty much have to win the Jokic minutes, and teams don't do that, Like even okay See would struggle to win the Jokic minutes.

So I think that's the big thing.

Like Jokic being by far, I don't want to say by far the best player in the world with the way Giannis is playing, but I would still take Yokish number one at worst, by far a top two player in the world. And it's like that Jamal Murray just has to be that second All Star, like not even play at an all NBA level, just play at an All Star level, and they're right back at number two, number three For me in the West.

Yeah, you guys are echoing a lot of what I feel like I've been saying and Logan what we've both been saying since the offseason. Right, I didn't see nearly as significant a difference in the roster of this team as I felt like a lot of other people did. I felt you still have your core for in early in the season, I thought, whoa. Christian Brown has been more impressive than I expected, and I think that he has remained impressive. Right, Obviously you are missing out on floor spacing with him, but what he does with his athleticism, with his cutting in transition and still being an impactful defensive player, He's a really good basketball player. He's a really good role player who compliments Jokic well. And in terms of the bench pieces, I don't think you can necessarily be disappointed with them. I think that Peyton Watson, when he's been a capable shooter, I mean, has been so good defensively. I think Russ has looked as good as you would have expected. I think that Julian Strather has looked about as good as you probably would have hoped for. But I still don't think that this team has been playing at a consistently high level. Now they are eleven and eight with Jokic on the floor. Tyler, you mentioned obviously they've been horrible without him, But I do have several concerns. Number one is the team has not been defending well this season. They're sixteenth in defensive rating. Frankly, that feels high to me. With how they've looked a lot of these nights, right, I mean, they've had some straight up disaster classes. I thought the Wizard's game was a disaster defensively. I thought the Knicks game just a couple before that was a complete disaster defensively. And what's so frustrating about that to me is this is a team that everybody is questioning, that everybody is calling out, that everybody is saying, hey, Denver, isn't who we thought they'd be. And they continue to approach too many of these regular season games with apathy on that end of the floor. And like they haven't had Aaron Gordon for a good portion of the year. They didn't have him, but they were replacing him with Peyton Watson and the starting lineup who's a really good defender. So I don't think that you can really use personnel as the excuse when we've seen Denver put forth a top ten defense last year, a really good playoff defense two years ago with basically the same core.

Obviously they had KCP.

I do think CACP was a slightly better defender than Christian Brown, but I don't think that there's a massive gap there. So I am just frustrated by how bad they've been on that end, and I think that that really falls on basically everybody on this team. I don't think that there's really anybody who is free of guilt in terms of their disappointment there. I do think also it would be great if this team could find more shooting on the bench and ideally find a backup center. We've seen the shooting. There are some nights where it's just comical, right. I Mean they're putting up twenty threes and they're making five of them on some nights. They're by far dead last in the NBA in three point attempts, and they're actually shooting it really well in terms of percentage at thirty eight. But they've been able to generate elite offenses without high three point volume before. But when you have this version of Jamal who's struggling as well. It feels like there's more of a burden on some of those supporting shooters to pick up the slack. And there's a couple names that I've been highlighting for a while. I think if you could get them Alik Beasley, who's actually kind of been hooping offensively for Detroit, but you know, six million dollars a year, they don't need him. And if you could get a Larry Nance on this roster, a guy who is almost superfluous Atlanta because they have already the Clinton Nyeka situation, I think he'd be a significantly better basketball team. And I do think that Detroit definitely likes Malik because of the shooting that he brings. But could you pry him away with a couple of second rounders? I don't think that's unreasonable. He's on a one year contract and Larry Nance. You might have to attach a first to Zeke Nagy, but you gotta find some way to get rid of that Nause contract, Like that's an abomination. You're paying him four years, thirty six million. The guy can't get on the floor. So you have to think about it in terms of we are offloading a real negative asset to get back a positive who helps our basketball team. Then I would look at Denver and I would think, Okay, a lot of those holes in the bench have been decisively resolved because obviously Sharit hasn't been the guy that they helped. He really hasn't been playable. But the biggest thing, I do agree, you just need a much much better version of Jamal Murray. And Jamal has never been the most consistent regular season player. He's never obviously made much of an All Star case in the regular season. But this version of Jamal is so concerning, and I keep on waiting for the bounce back. And that's the reason that I had Denver as my number two team in the West until very recently. I was like, look, a lot of these other peripheral things I think are overstated as concerns. Yokic is playing at such an unbelievable level. We know that this formula works when Jamal Murray is right, and like, at some point Jamal has to turn it around. But it's just hard to watch game after game as he is just bad night after night. Right now, he's under eighteen points per game on under fifty three percent true shooting, he's been a thirty fifth percentile pick and role score in a twenty seventh percentile isolation score. That just cannot be the production from your lead perimeter score if you want to be a contender. And really, the only dude alongside Yokichu has real ball handling capabilities and the only real pull up shooter playing minutes for this team, and he has an effective field goal percentage of forty three on pull up jumpers right now. That was it fifty three percent last year. That's a huge drop off. So he's missing these tough shots. He's always been a tough shot maker, but I do think his shot died is tougher now than ever. He's just really struggling to create separation and create advantages for this offense. So I absolutely think he's the biggest problem with this team. And maybe he turns it around. I hope he does, because I love Jamal Murray. I love watching him play basketball. But until he does, I think it's really hard to view this team as the sort of contender that I thought they would be before the year. So let me ask you guys this, because I've started to see this circulate a lot. Do you think Denver is in a place where like a major trade would be in the cards if that were moving MPJ, what's your guys take on that.

I don't see it. I don't see it.

I think, like you kind of mentioned moves on the margins make more sense for me, Like you throw out Malik Bleat Beasley. Another guy that came to my mind, just like randomly while you were going your little sermon. Patrick Williams, I think would be a pretty awesome fit, like with his athleticism, his frame, and also like being a legit forty percent three point shooter every year.

I think that'd be an awesome fit.

Yeah, I don't think there's a big trade, and I think it's because no matter what trade they come up with, I feel like they would be losing value. Like I don't see a trade out there that where they would like make a big move and then you're like, Okay, this pushes them back into where they were in twenty twenty three. I just don't see that move available. Like the only one I saw on circulating on Twitter was a move for Jimmy Butler. I don't think that moves the needle for the worst three point shooting team in the league.

It doesn't make sense to me.

But it's crazy to think about the Jamal Murray thing man because the names he was being mentioned with, Like if Jamal Murray was Devin Booker, would we even be talking about the Nuggets right now, like or where we just say they're with the Celtics and Dunder.

Absolutely like it.

It's crazy to me.

Yeah, And so that's the thing I think with the way their contract situation is the way that they don't really have a bunch of young assets they can pair with these guys, I don't think there's a move out there where they're gaining their value back unless it's like the Lakers blow it up and need to get rid of Ad or the Suns blow it up and need to get rid of Duran or Booker.

Like that's the only thing I could see happening.

Yeah, And I actually really like the moves on the margins that you mentioned, Carson, because a couple of things about all this one. I think you need that kind of shooting ceiling just because you think about the perspective teams that you're gonna run into, right like a Dallas can just rein it down upon you. That's gonna swing individual games. The Timberwolves, right, if they ran into them again, Anthony Edwards could outshoot you individually from behind the arc, right with the volume that he's pulling from. Also on the Jamal point too, if we are just sitting and crossing our fingers waiting when the playoffs come around, there's a lot of teams that match up really well again with Jamal in terms of defense. Right, you talked about Oklahoma City and how they match up against Mike eat him Alive exactly if they ran into Minnesota again, I think that's problematic. Right, Even a Memphis has guys that they can throw it, you know, a Marcus Smart, Right, they can throw guys at Jamal and still I kind of believe that that's probably their best route. It's just crossing your fingers and praying that Jamal Marie is the guy that he was during the title run. But I don't think a superstar deal makes sense. I agree with like Jimmy, we'll talk about that in a minute, but that doesn't make sense to me.

I don't like the Jimmy thing at all. I just think it's clunky. I don't think you need a ball stopper who's also a non three point shooter that is certainly not what Denver's missing.

There's only one name that I would.

Consider if I were Denver, and I still think I would lean on the side of not doing it, or certainly at least waiting longer, waiting until closer to the deadline. How would you guys feel about basically an MPJ for Zach Lavine's swap, and you probably get a little bit of draft capital back from Chicago because you're giving them such a young player.

I like the idea in theory because I think they need like a creator like Levine who can who can score with the ball in his hands, make plays. The problem for me is how reliant that defense is on Mpj's size and length, and I think they would be losing that, and then Jokic would be stressed even more as like a drop defender. And so I feel like, I don't think Mpj's like some great defender, but I think the way they function within that system, they rely on him to cover a lot of stuff on the back line that Levine just simply would not be able to replicate. So then you'd run into lineup problems where it's like we're debating whether Levin should be on the floor of Peyton Watson and I think that that would be a problem.

I agree. I think you're losing a lot rebounding too with the J because MPJ ends a lot of possessions. That being said, man, can you guys imagine Jokic stolen love to Aaron Gordon and Zach Levine. That would be fun as hell.

Mana Levine would have a really nice two man game like that. That's a beautiful thing to think about. Another name, Like I was just thinking of like All Stars since you were thrown out, like the trade idea, I think Daron Fox would be a freaking awesome fit in Denver. But again, I don't even think that's realistic. I yeah, there's a lot of guys now I'm thinking about, like ideally you'd want Cam Johnson instead of like MPJ.

But but again, I just don't think.

I don't think there's a pathway to getting these guys because they just simply do not have the assets.

Yeah, I think that Levine is one that they probably could pull off because that contract is viewed as such a negative. But it's really not much bigger than mpg's contract. It's like seven eight million a year. So if you don't involve Zechnology in another deal, maybe you can throw him in that, or you know, get Hunter Tyson and Jaln Pickett in there, these guys who should never play meaningful minutes. Ultimately, though I'm with you, Tyler, I just think that this team was built with a very clear vision in mind, and that vision was Jamal Murray is going to be our all star guard, and then we will have MPJ as our big three, who can help us on the glass, who has progressed defensively and who is this out of this world spot up shooter. And Aaron Gordon will be our lead forward defensively, and he'll be so great in transition, and he'll be an awesome target in the dunker spot and a mismatch attacker at times, and everything is gonna run through the Murray Jokic two man game. And the only reason that I would consider trading MPG if I were Denver is not because of MPG at all, because sometimes I see Nuggets fans turning on MPJ, and I'm like, the only way you can be upset with MPJ is if you expect him to be something that he's not, right MPG this year has been the same guy he's always been.

I actually think he's been the.

Best version of himself because I think that he's grown a little bit as a passer. And if you are looking for him to bring more offensive juice right as a creator, that hasn't been in him since he messed up his back, right, Like that version of NPJ hasn't existed in a long time and was never going to exist in the NBA at a high level with his injury history. But the reason that I would consider it is because when Jamal is looking this bad, you just need more creation off the dribble, and that's what Lavine brings, and he would bring that while also being an elite shooter off the catch, a really good off ball offensive star like hyper efficient killer score, really a great offensive fit here. I just think, at the end of the day, MPJ is not the problem here. Jamal Murray is the problem. And if you do give up MPJ to try to cover up for Jamal's issues, I think you're losing an integral part of your formula when it's working correctly with what MPJ does bring, and I think it's probably not worth doing. But that's the only one that I would really consider because I think offensively, Levine is such a great fit and Jamal's just got a shape up man.

I think it's pretty much that simple.

We can talk about some of the other issues and they're real, but Jamal Murray has to be a way better basketball player.

Yeah.

Another thing I'd want to quickly mention it you brought up, like the importance of a shooter, Malik Beasley, things like that. Think about how important Justin Holliday was for them last playoffs just because he could make threes. I also didn't know Justin Holliday was thirty five years old. I thought he was like a young player. I don't know, he must have aged ten years.

No, he was on the twenty fifteen Warrior.

I was gonna say, Yeah, I had no idea he was that old. I just looked it up.

I was like, what.

But I would also call Toronto about Kelly Olynox try and figure figure out that backup center situation because with Olynick you can kind of run a lot of the same stuff you run with Jokic because of the playmaking, because of the shooting.

So that's something i'd look into as well.

Yeah, I think that there are actually a couple of dudes who could give you those quality center minutes.

I like Olynok. I think that he's a good shout as well.

It's the most wonderful time of the year for getting in on all the hoops, football, and hockey action at DraftKings Sportsbook.

In the season of giving, we're being gifted college football and basketball, pro football in basketball and pro hockey too. Almost twenty four to seven. So many games every day, so many opportunities to place your first bet. Try betting on something simple like picking a team to win. Go to the DraftKings Sportsbook app and place your bet.

And here's a gift for all new customers. Bet five dollars to get one hundred and fifty dollars in bonus bets if your bet wins. Download the DraftKings Sportsbook app and use code nerds. That's code nerds for new customers to get one hundred and fifty dollars in bonus bets if your bet wins when you bet just five bucks, Happy Holidays from DraftKings.

The Crown is.

Yours gambling problem called one eight hundred Gambler or in West Virginia, visit one eight hundred gambler dot net. In New York call eight seven seven eight open wired text hope and y four six seven three six nine. In Connecticut, help is available for problem gambling call eight eight eight seven eight nine seven seven seven seven or visit CCPG dot org. Please play responsibly on behalf of boothill Casinoman resorting Kansas twenty one and over age varies by jurisdiction Voyd and Ontario. Bonus bets expire one hundred and sixty eight hours after issueans See dkang dot co slash bball for eligibility and deposit restrictions, terms and responsible gaming resources.

All right, I want to talk about Victor one Banyama, because this dude has just been unbelievable after a bit of a slow start to the year, but ever since then, he's pretty much been out of this world. And I think it's time to have a conversation about where he ranks in the league hierarchy right now. So Tyler will start with you, how many players would you take over Victor one Bnyama right now?

This is tough for me, man, because I was actually just bouncing around with this last night. I was doing my player evaluations and stuff last year, I had Wemby twentieth and to start this year I kind of felt like he was the exact same player, but with the added shooting volume and now the shot making, I don't really know what to think because it's still a small sample size. Like if this last like ten to fifteen games of Wemby is just who he is, we're talking about a top ten player, just unequivocally, that's a top ten player.

But if the shooting.

Comes back down to what it was at the beginning of this season, I think we're still looking at like eighteen seventeen range, and so right now, I think I'd have him somewhere in the middle, Like fourteen fifteen I think is like a perfect range for Wenby right now. And I think it's because I do still don't. I still don't view him as the best defender in basketball. I think there's still like some tweaks he needs to make, just in terms of like growing and especially like mentally just like figuring it out. Because the physical tools are the best I've ever seen, and the offense I think is still fire. It's still about five ending. The best balance between you're a seven foot four freak with an elite touch versus We're gonna use you like Kevin Durant and have you flying off of screens pulling threes. So I think it's tough, but I think right now, if I was trying to win a championship, Wemby would already be one of like the fourteen to fifteen players I'd look at to have on my team.

I think that's a good range, and I think it is about striking the balance right because his last game, for context, over the last ten, Wemby's given you twenty nine points on forty one percent from deep, sixty five percent true, shooting eleven threes a night with attempts a night, with over three blocks per game. Right now, on the year, he's fourth in defensive field goal percentage inside six feet and the Spurs are a whopping eleven point five points better defensively with Wemby. It is all about the balance because this last game, right he's raining down a bunch of threes. He's unstoppable, and then you go back one more game against Phoenix where he's play those same shots and he's just off right. I do think it's encouraging. I think he has gotten better from last year. In some of those areas. He was a twenty seventh percentile post up guy last year. He's fifty six percentile now. As a roleman, he was fifty second percentile last year. He's sixty six percentile now. So the improvements may not be super large, but I do think he is getting better there and he's effective. I'll run down the names. You guys, tell me when to stop. If you wouldn't take any of these guys, Jokic, Johannis and Sga.

It was a little early up there, super early. I wasn't ready for an.

All right, I was gonna say, yeah, I was gonna say, like I think Wemby over this recent stretch, I would take over what Ant's done.

Is Ant not top ten to you guys.

Well, I'm saying, I'm saying right now is my number.

I think I would take Ann over SGAs.

I was gonna wow, and Camden loves him some Ant.

Wow.

Wow.

I was not expecting that.

I just think they're really close.

Yeah, I know that Sga is just a significantly more polished all around score and overall half court offensive.

I also think I also think he's in the significantly better offensive situation.

I agree with the defensive situation.

Sure with that, okay, I always were impactful defender, though I actually think it's probably SGA. It's probably SGA with what he does as a LL man, what he does in passing lanes, He's a much better off ball defender.

I just this isn't a thing against SGA. I just think I prefer ants athletic traits when it comes to like a player. I mean, dude, he was you know, drunk, and SGA was too, but like anstron two to the ball every time.

Like I I agree.

But my thing is if you look at how both played against Dallas, they basically employed the same defensive system with like the the center coming over early to take away the drives and Shay just dice them up with Kobe level mid range shot making, and Ant kind of looked cooless.

Also, SGA, I think playmake playmate out of those double teams better, even though like the Thunder didn't make them pay with jump shooting. I just think Ants. I'm not saying SGA is like the absolute apex that he's gonna be. I just think Ant has more room to even get like better.

Well, I think there are two different conversations who do you want long term versus who's better right now? Because I think that she is clearly better right now. But I would hear the think.

I think what Logan's getting at is right now, even just right now. Ant probably has a higher ceiling as a player than Shay because of like the three point volume, the freak athleticism, which I kind of agree with. I do think like Ant is more capable of those super explosive stretches of games in the playoffs. But I think Shay probably has like the third highest floor of any player in the league, just show Yokiceniannis and then Sha. Like Shaye just does not have bad games because of how surgical he is as a scorer.

Absolutely, I completely agree. I completely agree with that, and I think it's fully realized now. I just think Aunt every opportunity he's going to get in the playoffs has an opportunity to I don't know, solidify himself. But I still I think you guys would take Aunt over Wemby.

Yeah, well so for me, Ant was my number ten on my last list, So I think Wemby is like if Wemby is what he's been, then he could have that Ant conversation, but I'm still reserved, so I would go with Aunt right now.

I actually think it's close, but I would take it.

I think it's a good take. Tatum.

Oh, absolutely taking Tatum for sure.

Anthony Davis, he taking ad, Steph Curry, Steph KD KAD. This is where he got really interesting to me.

Lebron dude.

This was the one for me too, because I was like, I don't know what to do with Lebron this year, especially like the defense has just been nonexistent and then now like the three point shot is kind of like regressing. He's not getting to the rim at the same rate. And for me, the conversation is over an eighty two game season, probably Wemby at this point, but there's the like the playoffs roll around, and it's like, I don't know how many players I'd like over Lebron, So I don't know.

I don't know. That's a tough one for me.

I couldn't have said that much better myself. That was basically my exact thought process. But to me, if there's a tiebreaker at two, do I trust more in the postseason?

Agree?

That's still absolutely Lebron, right because we've seen I mean, his regular season defense has been bad for several years, but we've seen him get more engaged as a low man. The jump shot he was so good last year, and the fact that he's still at thirty six percent this year with the insane slump he was on from dah that to me is encouraging. So he hasn't looked like the same player night after night. I do think that he's taken a step back from last year, but I still think just the level of decision making and processing that I get from him in a postseason and the ability to still play bully ball when he wants, I think the ability and transition offensively. I'm just gonna take that level of an offensive presence.

I was gonna say, and I'm willing to give Lebron the benefit of the doubt because he was legitimately great defensively in the Denver series last year, Like not just good, he was really really good. So I think, like, I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt there. I think he can turn it up and do that, and then then we're talking about again a top ten player.

And also his slump that we just saw was legitimately concerning I think the Minnesota game was really really rough, where he's like, whoa athletically he doesn't look there right, But that was also his fifth game and seven nights, and we had this whole conversation. It's concerning, but I still think he's a top twelve guy. I want come playoffs. And also last year he never had a stretch as bad as the one that he just had. But the player he was pre All Star Break versus post All Star Break was like a fringe top ten kind of guy pre All Star Break and then like one of the absolute best players on the planet post All Star Breaks. So I'm just not going to overreact to a small bad samples with him. I'm still taking Lebron. It is close, but I'm gonna take Lebron.

I would take Wemby for a regular season, but I would say Lebron. I think agreed, agreed, it is close. I omitted a couple of guys from my list just because I don't want anything to do with them. That was Joel Embiid and Kawhi Leonard, So I don't know if that's fair.

That's fair.

I mean, I think those guys are certainly better basketball players.

Agreed, and I think a season.

Probably I think either of them. I would take Wemby over both just because of availability. I'm literally done with both of these.

I think, I think I agree with you on Kawhi, but I'm not ready to write off Embid yet because Embiid still has produced full seasons of just like all time level playing.

I'm done with.

I am very frustrated with Embiid.

I do not think I would put him in conversations that some other people would. But do I think Joel Embiid is a better basketball player than Victor Roman. Yam absolutely, and Bid was looking in that game he just played.

He was moving good, so he looked a lot better. I feel it's just the knee swelling, Like when does that stop?

I don't know.

I think Zion's another guy would kind of omit, just because like Zion is another one who I'd probably actually have in that same tier of like eleven to twenty or whatever.

But just we we gotta see it. We just have to see it.

I would say.

The difference to me is, I think Kawhi is better than Wemby. I think mb is better than Wemby. Agreed, Wemby's better.

Than Zion is good. I think I's better.

The next two were really interesting to me as well. What about Donovan Mitchell and Devin Booker.

To me, they're in that same class with ant like borderline top ten player that I think if Wemby's at his ceiling, he's better than if he if the shooting regresses, he's a little bit worse than.

I'm taking Wemby over both.

I think we've seen enough offensive growth from Wemby now, and look, obviously there is still some stuff that I would like to see ironed out, and I think that we still have fair questions about the consistency of the three point shot and how reliant he is on that, But just his ability to impose himself with an efficient twenty four to ten and four in the fact that he is a comically efficient lob target around the rim and just finisher around the rim in general, when he does have those looks manufactured for him and what he does as a passer, and then when I'm getting top four top five level defense on the planet, I mean, he's been unbelievable. I don't disagree Tyler that intellectually in terms of maturity, he can still improve, But like that's the only thing holding him back from being the best defender of the modern era, Like physical tools is not even close. So he's still insane there. And what he's done with the Spurs on that end this year, what is done with the Spurs is a team.

They are twelve.

Points fo one hundred persessions better with him out there. They're ten and nine when he plays. Like even expecting Wenby to be a top fifteen sort of player this year, I didn't think he could have them in real playoff conversations. I thought they'd win in the low thirties. So I think he's a more impactful all around basketball player.

I think that book.

As much as I love the guy, has really struggled this year, and I do think you see his limited when he's asked to carry an offense. And Donovan Mitchell is really good and obviously had an amazing postseason run last year, but there's still a.

Little bit of volatility there.

And the difference to me between Ant and those two guys is the defensive impact when Ant is engaged. I think both those guys are better offensive players.

Agreed, but I think.

That Ant still has that ability to impose himself physically offensively, and now with this pull up shooting leap and what he can do defensively, I'll take him.

I think that's fair.

I also would like to say that I would I'm probably a little bit more reserved with my evaluation of Wemby's offense than either of you two, because I'm like doing the negative kind of thought process of like, Okay, how does this look against the best playoff defenses?

And I imagine he.

Gets into a series with a team like OKC and then they put like a smaller guy on him, push him out, switch every action, and then I'm like, what is Wemby's scoring then, because the one game against OKC wohend he have like six points, and obviously he's not a six point per game scorer, but I do worry. And he also had a really bad Dallas game to start the year where they did the same thing. They put Clay on him, switched PJ swich nause, he just put every so I do worry a little bit. And then the turnover issue as well, like he only averages like fifty sixty touches, but he's always at the top and turnovers, so I think there's still a lot to weed out but like you said, he's so physically imposing that, Like, there's also the part of me that's like he could see an elite playoff defense and it just doesn't matter because there's not really much you can do to contest a shot and it's just he's just gonna score.

That's a totally fair point, though, and we saw Houston early in the year do the same thing.

Right where they've got Dylan Brooks on.

Him extended strecchers, you put a low center of gravity, physical, shorter player who can move him off his spots, and you have the center parts in the paint where they're able to help not just on on Wemby drives, but right they're able to just be more destructive to the entire Spurs offense when they're parked down there and they're not being spaced out by Wemby.

I do worry about that.

I think Webby could have a really ugly offensive playoffs, but like this production with this defense still hard to deny.

I want to ask you guys a question because this actually got me thinking, would you take Wemby. It's it's so tough because this recent stretch he's literally looked like a superstar offensive player, but like entire body of work, would you take Wemby as an offensive player over last year's Porzingiso?

Like right now, right?

Yeah?

Just like, So what's hard is if I were asking them to carry the load as a number one, I think I would probably take Wemby. If I'm asking them to fit in as a second or third option, I'm taking KP because KP is just so refined. I mean, he's such a brutal missmccory, so efficient.

The mid range stuff is the big thing for me.

I actually think, like if you if you gave Wemby porzinga, the offensive value of porzingis, like if that's what you believe he is. I think Wemby's the number ten player in the league. But that's where I'm questionable. I'm like, I don't know if he's there yet. That's what's tough for me.

It's just a refinement. It really is just the refinement.

But andality, yeah, KP bullies people.

And I do worry about him a little bit in a playoff environment, but I tend to that he's gonna figure it out. So it's not close to you with like guys like Jaylen Brunson or a dearn Fox, you're taking Wemby easily.

Over those guys.

Brunson to me, is with Ant, Booker Mitchell, Fox is a step below. I comfortably take Wenby over Fox.

I agree on the Brunson point.

I think that that's really difficult because I think he's right in there with Ant and Mitchell and Booker. As you said, I think I take Wemby. But it is hard because Brunson is just one of those dudes who is a flat out a lead offensive engine. And the level he's at as a shot maker right just his control of the game, the fact that he doesn't turn the ball over, he's always playing at his own pace. He's been the best we've ever seen him as a playmaker this year, and that legitimate three level scoring. He has such a high offensive floor. He's also such a bad defender, though, and that's tough. I feel like that's something that does hold him back a little bit. But damn, I might switch on this one because if it came down to a playoff series, I know what Brunson is bringing me offensive, yeah, but I also know what Wenby's bringing.

Me defensively, So it's tough.

Yeah, And I know that Wenby has the ability to have a star impact offensively, whereas Brunson he's gonna get targeted defensively.

So I'm gonna stay on the Wemby side.

But that one does make me really nervous because I can see Wemby having a playoff series where he averages seventeen a night on fifty percent through shooting, and brun gives you thirty five and seven efficiently.

Because what's crazy is I actually think last time we talked, I was a bit lower on the Brunston train than both of you were, and I think Carson specifically, you were talking about it with the high floor thing. Like I remember we had the Mitchell versus Brunton, bay I was. I was on the Mitchell train. Brunton this year has really like taken me aback, like I did not think he could have this type of hyper efficiency.

He added spacing.

I think people were worried about him losing a big screener in Hartenstein, but the spacing has made a world of difference for him. He's up to almost sixty three percent true shooting, shooting fifty percent from the field, forty three percent from three His ability to generate free throws, his ability to score an ISO or pick and roll, like you mentioned, the best playmaking we've ever seen from him. Like I think Brunson right now is like maybe a top seven offensive player in the league, top six offensive player in the league. And I think, just confidently, I would I trust him more than I trust Wemby at this point.

But I do think similar ranges as players.

I mean, Kats opened up a whole world for brunts and mass.

I love Catman, such a monster. I love I mean too.

I think that's made all the difference, dude, because everybody wanted to be critical. But I mean, he's driving into so many crowded paints and stuff. I mean you're seeing in Minnesota now. I think it all depends on what you're asking in all these conversations. Honestly, I think it depends on the context of your team and what you're asking from Wemby. Offensively. If I'm starting, fuck, I don't so hard.

This one is so hard.

It's I'm just thinking about Brunson getting attack defense. I'm taking Wemby. I'm gonna take Wemby. I just think because of the defense, Wemby's not a liability defensively.

Oh, it was certainly not.

Yeah, you can hear that again, it's toff.

I do trust Brunson more, but I think the ceiling is higher with Wemby at the level that he's played at over these last ten plus games, right, Brunson just can't match that level of all around impact.

Very few people on the planet can.

Yeah.

Is there anybody that I haven't mentioned that you guys would have over Wemby? Uh.

I think the other guy that I had that was kind of just like in that same mix was the So I'm trying not to over index on the small sample we have, But the last version we saw of John Morant I would also have in this mix.

Oh.

Interesting. I'm not quite as on Jaw what. I just think it's for Jaw.

I just think Jaw is such a ridiculous advantage creator, like nobody can stay in front of him. He's I think he's the most underrated passer in basketball. I think he's probably a close to a top five passer in basketball. The question for me right now is the scoring has not been what it was before the suspension and the injuries, and so I'm a little bit worried. And then his statements about not high flying, because that was a huge part of his scoring.

Yeah, I actually think that it's kind of been to the benefit of this team offense in my opinion this year. Like, I also think that I don't know, maybe Tyler, you're looking at like volume scoring, but I think that he's kind of been pretty efficient in the minutes he's been given. I think he's only at like or last time I checked, he's at like twenty eight minutes a night. So yeah, I think the volume might not be there, but I actually think it's kind of to the benefit of this offense as a whole. You talk about the playmaking, I think this is the most unselfish Jaw has ever been. And you talk about those mismatches, like Jah isn't hesitating when he notices a guy's got to switch on somebody, He's swinging that ball over immediately. I actually think that. I don't mind that. I think he's the lack of scoring. I think he's become a better playmaker, so it balances out a little bit. To me.

Do you think Jaw's a better offensive player right now than he was in twenty twenty three?

I do, Yeah, I think he is better with.

That if in my opinion, if he's a better offensive player than he was in twenty twenty three, I'd even have job for Aunt Edwards personally. Wow, my hot take really be my het take.

That's difficult for me with the pull up shooting that we're seeing from Aunt, and listen, I'm not somebody who thinks he's gonna keep shooting almost forty three percent from deep.

But I'm also not somebody who thought that.

He would still be shooting close to forty three percent from deep a quarter of the way into the season. I just think with Aunt, the ability to physically go through people, the ability to in the postseason dial up his mid range volume and deliver that sort of shob making that we saw last year, and then have the three point pull up volume and have the defensive impact he's capable of, which I do think far surpasses Jaws.

I think it's a better all around player there and Jaw.

We have seen struggle right to be efficient offensively in these playoff environments. The volume has always stood out. But if you can lull him into more of those pull up threes, if you can really load up the paint, he can be an incredible playmaker.

And this year.

I feel way better about Memphis's offense because I think the dudes around him are so much better. I think Triple J is so much better. I think the shooting is the best it's ever been. I just don't believe in Jaw enough as an offensive engine, Like he's not the offensive engine that Jalen Brunson is. To me, it's honestly not that close. I just think Brunson is such an absurd shot maker, and we've talked about the floor there when he's also play making at a really high level, obviously not a Jaw level, but a high level. I just think that that's more dependable.

I think that Jaw.

Can at times shoot you out of games a little and not be as efficient as I'd like him to be.

I think my thing with joh because I've always said that, I think Anthony Edwards has like one of the greatest. The reason he translates a lot of the playoffs is because there's no way to stay in front of his first step, like you have to load up and then just things have to happen. I think John Morant is even better at Anton that because I think Joe is a little bit more explosive and I think he's a top three ball handler in the league. So I think he's just straight up the hardest player in the league to stay in front of. And where whereas Ants just a good kickout passer, Jaws like an elite, elite kickout passer. So I think the argument for me is just like Joh creates advantages for the offense at a level, I would say Joe even creates more advantages than Trey Young. And I think Joe, if you have an advantage creator at the level of Trey Young while also having the scoring floor of Jaw, I just think, like, like I don't want to over index on small games, but that twenty twenty two Warriors defense was one of the best I've ever seen, and John made them look like cupcake. It was like they couldn't do a thing. They were switching everything. They were showing him every pick and roll coverage and it was like he was playing against fifth graders.

It was absurd.

But that was also three games he played that series, and that's why saying the best three games, it's.

A small it's a small sample, and that's what makes it tough for me.

But even like the twenty twenty as a raw player in twenty twenty one going at Rudy Gobert drop and averaging like thirty points a game. Like, I don't know, man, I just think Jaw's an absurd offensive player. And I do agree, like the defensive limitations are what is kind of like tough for me, But like I actually would argue Jah and Brunson are like same tier of offensive player. That that would be my take, And that's kind of where I get to like job being so high on my list.

So does it not.

Bother you that Jaw has never generated an average half court offense, Like I understand it does have seen bad supporting cast offensively, but when you're talking about twenty twenty three seventeenth percent centile half court offense twenty twenty two to twenty third percentile half court offense, there's nobody else we're talking about in these conversations. Brunson, you're gonna be ninetieth percentile, Trey Young, you're gonna be eightieth percentile or better. Jaw has just never had that ability. To me, obviously transition, he's special, but when it comes to the postseason, like I want those dudes who can generate super efficient half court offense, and although Jaw hasn't had the best hand dealt to him there historically, I still don't think he's as capable because I don't think there's a situation in the world you could put a Jalen Brunson or a Trey Young and they wouldn't generate an average half court offense, much less bottom quartile.

You know, I think it's fair.

I think it's a fair concern.

I think that comes back to Jaw's like limited versatility, Like he doesn't really have much of a mid range game, doesn't have the three point shooting. I think, to me, I'd have to go back and really look into the data and hammer in that stuff. But I do think a lot of that comes down to lineups they were putting on the floor and just like just starved of offensive talent, because I would argue during that time, Triple j was an negative offensive player because he was only adding like a little bit of driving and then the shooting while while just being the worst passer in the league. I think Desmond Baine was yet to take that offensive step forward as an on ball guy and was kind of just like limited to a spot up shooter. Occasional transition. Steven Adams, I like his screening, passing, offensive rebounding, just a non scoring threat. And so to me, it came down to the fact that they were running what a twelve man rotation or whatever, and John was the only player in the entire rotation that could create an advantage.

And I feel think that was true in twenty twenty three though, because I think that Bain offensively he wasn't like a true advantage creator, but he was such a great shot maker, and I had a playmaker like that, I think, really good offensive player.

I do think maybe I should I should preface that by saying, like, like in a consistent half court setup where it's like stationary, he's the only guy who I think could create consistent advantages with the ball in his hands. I think Bain was, like the time, more like a Klay Thompson type of advantage creator, like come off a screen, draw too, drop it to the short role, occasional pick and roll would draw a big up to the level. But like that to me is the difference. And actually in twenty twenty three, when John Bain shared the floor together, they had a one twenty offensive rating.

So I think that is.

Like a big sign job without Bain was only one fifteen, and I think that's like a big because then who was the two when Bain wasn't out there?

I don't even who was it?

I hear, I mean Dylan Brooks. Well, Dylan Brooks was starting, Dylan Brooks.

I forgot about Dylan Brooks on Memphis just chucking like seventeen shots a game.

Well, he it.

Was twenty twenty one, right when he actually had like a great playoff series.

I remember that.

Yeah against John was crazy. Yeah, twenty six a night on fifty two percent from the field.

Dylan Brooks.

Yeah, listen, I don't think that he's been in great situations, but as I said, I still think that the floor did some of these other brilliant half court creators give you has been on another level. But this is actually really interesting that we got the job because the next thing I wanted to discuss, and I think Tyler seems like we know your answer on this with the level that Triple J has been playing at, and the the reason that I wanted to discuss this is I'm actually working on a video about Triple J that should come out tomorrow.

Who do you think is Memphis's best player.

Well, this is so funny because actually two episodes ago on the podcast, I asked Sean the same thing. I was like, do we need to visit I was like, do we need to visit the discussion of who the best player on the Grizzlies is because.

We're just stealing all your topics. God, we know what you talked about all this. I feel it.

I think Jaren Jackson, I think he was an all star level player, while I said he was a slight negative on offense, so that already because just the defense, the defense is just ridiculous, the versatility of the rim protection. I do think he's still limited in that, like lack of rebounding, lack of drop presence. As a five, I do think that kind of holds him back. But like, yeah, at worst a top seven to eight defender on the planet. Now we're looking at a legitimately great scorer. His two point percentage has gone up from fifty last year to over sixty this year. His unassisted field goals.

Are at like a career high.

I'm pretty sure second highest percentage of unassisted field goals of any center, any starting center in basketball.

Fifty five percent ridiculous, ridiculous, and yeah, and he's an elite foul drawer. Has you saw you had that tweet about his offhand touch? Just amazing with the offhand. I think we're talking about a ridiculously crafty, scoring big and just like someone who can legitimately create, which is why I don't have the numbers in front of me, but I'm pretty sure Memphis has a top five half court offense now. And you mentioned like over the years they just haven't been a good half court offense. This year they're an elite, elite half court offense. I think Jaren is the biggest factor in that. Well.

Going real quick, they're average in terms of half court efficiency this year, but they're a top five offense overall, and average half court for them is a huge step up because they've always been great in transition and bad in the half court, and now they're still great in transition, but they're solid in the half court.

Okay, yeah, yeah, so that must have been when I saw the in top five overall offense. The big thing for me is still Jaren is just probably of any all star level player, the worst passer, the worst playmaker, and it's like you need a guy like Jah, a guy like Smart, like these guys who can get him in those spots to attack, because he's not really gonna be creating any advantages for the guys around him. And so that's what makes it tough for me, because I think in order to be the best player on a team as good as the Grizzlies, you would have to be either a mega mega scorer like Anthony Davis, like Anthony Davis type of scorer, or like a legitimately great playmaker. And I don't think Jaren is either of those things yet. So while I do think his offense has taken a leap and his defense still keeps him, I would say probably an all NBA level. I'd say I even had him ninth on my MVP list like a week ago, I don't. I don't think heading into the playoffs, I would say there's really a debate with the one to two in Grizzlies. I think it's like a strong l NBA level player and then a lower level on all NBA level players.

To me, I tend to agree with that it's close because of the defensive value the triple J gives you and how good he's been without Jaw even on the court. I know you brought this up last episode, Carson. He's averaging twenty four points without Jaw on the floor. My thing is when it comes down to, like if Triple J was your number one, which we kind of did see last year, right, and I think Triple J is way better as an offensive player this year than he even was last year. I mean, we're seeing the guy attack from the perimeter, you know, create an isolation. They had an offensive rating of one eight point two with him last year, and that's just where I come down on it is he's just not an offensive number one, and no, that's why I would take Jaw over him. But luckily for the Grizzlies, I mean, ideally, if Jaw's healthy, that's not the role that he's going to be in, so he won't have to do that. But that is why I would go with Job because you need someone like him for the playoffs. But he deserves an imense amount of credit for why the Grizzlies have been so successful this year, even with Josh struggling to stay on the court, it's been really impressive this year.

So this is actually really close for me and Tyler.

You mentioned where you had Triple J and the MVP race on the outskirts of the MVP conversation. There's no question that he's been their most valuable player this year because he's got them seven and four in games that Jah doesn't play, He's got them six and two in games that Bad doesn't play. He's up to his scoring volume in those games. And he's anchoring a top five defense. And I don't think that I'm the highest in the world on Triple J's defense because of some of the limitations you mentioned Tyler as a true drop defender. As a rebounder, he's obviously way more limited than most of the other centers we talk about, and I still think he makes more mental airs. He's certainly much more foul prone than a lot of those other guys too. But the versatility, the mobility, the raw rim protection, the hands like, he still does so much awesome stuff. And he's the biggest reason that there are top five defense in basketball. And he has been such a good offensive player this year, like a world's apart from where he was at two years ago. Last year he was asked to do more, He took on more volume, he started doing new stuff, where he was isolating four times as much per game, he was running three times as many pickin' rolls, but the efficiency wasn't there. And now this year we're seeing this refined version where it's like the Grizzlies aren't just experimenting anymore with two of their best players off the floor and seeing what can Triple J do. Now those guys are out there, and Triple J is still producing with his volume and he's killing it with this efficiency. Like per minute, Triple J has been one of the.

Best scores in basketball.

He's averaging twenty eight point one points for thirty six that's more than Luca, and he's doing it on better than sixty two percent true shooting. He is just such a problem as a driver. I think his ball handling has improved. He's been so effective out of the post, getting to his hooks, getting to.

His touch shots.

He's like the master of starting with the size up from the perimeter and then working that into a back down and his spin move is so ridiculously effective. And the biggest thing is he has just needed a sliver of space and his touch has been as good as anybody in basketball. He's third in the NBA in makes inside the paint outside the restricted area. You mentioned what I said about his ambidexterity. He's shooting sixty five percent on runners and hook shots with his right hand, which is out of this world. That's like a Jokic level number. And then he's shooting fifty three percent with his left hand, and he puts up more of those shots with his left hand. He is the most truly ambidextrous touch finisher in basketball, and I think that that's a weapon in his scoring arsenal. So I think in terms of the regular season he's probably their most impactful player.

I actually do. Here's the thing.

I need to see him tested offensively in a postseason. I think before I say that he's their best player. And the reason is I have two concerns. Number one, what if this touch is just a little bit fake?

Right.

I'm not saying that his touch hasn't improved. I'm not saying his touch isn't very good. But the single biggest difference between Triple J this year in Triple J last year, it's not that he's having better shots manufactured for him in this offense, right, I mean, he doesn't screen. He again is having more unassisted field goals than ever before. He doesn't sit in the dunker spot. He creates these shots for himself. The biggest difference is last year he was under forty five percent on these touch shots. This year is over fifty eight percent. That's an unbelievable number and I need to see if he can sustain that. And the second reason is exactly what you mentioned, Tyler. He is an exceptionally bad passer.

And in this current role, he's.

Just being asked to be a play finisher, to be a score right, to go out there, identify a mismatch, an opportunity that he likes. If it's a smaller player on him, if it's in semi transition, Hey, this defense isn't fully said. I can get a step on this big going downhill, and he's killing it in that role. What happens when you get into a postseason and you're facing a really good playoff defense and they're like, okay, what's our goal? Always it's to exploit our opponent's biggest weakness. We're just gonna send doubles at him like hell, Like his tendency is to force shots in those looks. I think you can force him into turnovers. There he really can only make the most basic of passes, like one pass away kickout to a shooter, and even then sometimes the inaccuracy You're just like, what is that? Like that is an uncatchable ball that you just threw from ten feet away. That's my concern with Triple J's offense. I'm still optimistic. I'm way higher on Triple J than I've ever been because, like historically, I've considered him one of the most frustrating players in basketball because I look at him and I'm like, all the tools are there. The shooting is there, but it's so inconsistent. The ball handling, the driving, the agility is special for a center, but his touch hasn't been consistent enough over the years. And sometimes they'll have this great game and then he'll just sort of vanish, you know, he'll become super passive for the remainder of a series. I think about twenty twenty three versus the Lakers, where he killed them in Game one and then was just bad for the rest of that series offensively. That's how I've always felt about Triple J. This year, I think he's a totally different player. I think last year was a step in the right direction. I think this year has been another big step in the right direction, But I just worry a little bit about a couple of those questions marks Offensively, it's just enough to hold me back from saying he's their best player outright. But I do think it's really close, because the two way impact right now is phenomenal.

Yeah, I think one thing that kind of worries me with Triple J. You kind of touched on touched on it a little bit. The defensive limitations I actually think end up hurting their offense. And it's because he's a really awkward player in terms of like being a tweener. Like on offense, you kind of want him to be your five because it like spaces things out. He could play from the post, he could play from the perimeter, and it's like they get a maximum amount of space. But because of the defensive limitations as a drop defender, as a rebounder, they kind of need a traditional five next to him, and then the offense loses what could be a valuable floor spacer or offensive asset, and it's it's it's tough to like craft the best two way lineup with a tweener like that, like, I think you look at guys with a similar physical makeup to him. Bam out of bio. You want him at the five and he can play the five. Evan Mobley, you want him at the five. I mean, they have the weird thing going on with Jared Allen, but Evan Mobley can perfectly play the five for thirty five minutes a game.

Jaren can't.

And to me, that just creates a little bit of awkwardness that I think would show up in a playoff series as more so from the regular season. So to me, it kind of feels like in a s it kind of the way you described it. Is it a similar dynamic to you from what we saw with like go Bear and Mitchell in Utah. Kind of the difference being well, I think Gobert is a significantly better defensive player than Triple J as good as Triple j as defensively. Also, though I think Triple j is so much better offensively than Gobert. Yeah, it makes it a more serious conversation because I think that with those Jazz teams, you would have said Gobert is the most valuable regular season player because he's an bank or such an elite defense but Mitchell, as that offensive creator, is the guy who's most important in the playoffs.

Triple J.

I think it's closer in the playoffs because I can see Triple J giving you a fish twenty five a night in a playoff series, which obviously Rudy never could have dreamed of. But am I confident enough in Triple J doing that at this point?

I'm not quite yet.

I'm much higher on Triple J than I was ever before, but I still have those couple of question marks that stand out, and I agree with you on some of the tween Er stuff being weird. But what has been good is even with Edy out now for a bit, like, they've still been a really good rebounding team, and they've still been a really good defensive team. And I think having other big dudes in the front court who aren't just a pure five like Edie, which I really wanted them to go out and at a player like that, and I think that fit does work defensively. But if it's Brandon Clark, right, if that's salty on Doma, these due who are at least good rebounding fours, that's helped them on that in because they were a terrible rebounding team last year and this year they're third in rebound rate, and like I said, I think they're seventh since Edie went down. They were number one with Edie, but they've still been good even without him.

Let's move on from this.

I thought that was a really interesting conversation, and everybody's a tune for that video on Triple J because I'm excited about him, excited at the level that he's.

Been playing at.

We got a big rumor around the NBA though, that I think we have to discuss, and Logan, actually, we were just sort of predicting that this would be a conversation last week or talking about how it could be the best path forward for Miami. We're here in some Jimmy Butler trade rumors, and specifically there's three teams that it's reported by Scham's he would like to go to, the Warriors, the Rockets, and the Dallas Mavericks. Logan, I'll start with you, do you really like any of those destinations or any other destinations? What would be to you the best trade for Jimmy.

I don't know, for a couple of reasons. One, I don't know what kind of compensation you're expecting to get for Jimmy Butler because I don't know if he's really a super valuable asset right now. Jimmy's thirty five years old, he's not signed long term under contract, He's got a player option for fifty two million dollars next so there is a possibility that you trade for him and he's just a hired gun for this season. More importantly, it's really hard to make the money work between Miami and any other team. You have to match that forty eight million dollar contract, which is what makes the math on this really hard. So for the majority of these teams that are gonna be exploring a Jimmy Butler trade, you're most likely gonna have to gut your rotation to make this work, or you're gonna have to give up a superstar just because you have to make the money work on both sides. I think Miami completely flubbed this. I think they waited too long to deal him. I would have dealt him in the offseason before teams had built out, you know, all of their money, so you could have made it work with signing trades and such, and so I look at it. Some of the trades that have gone down with you know, superstar guys. Right when I'm trying to figure out his compensation, right, Kat goes for two valuable rotation guys and a first. Bridges goes for five first round picks and a pick swap. Siakham goes for rotation guys in three first, Paul George a while back, you know it goes for SGA in almost seven first. Right, Yeah, what do you guys, what do you guys give up for him? And personally for the teams that have been suggested, I wouldn't do the deal for if I was Dallas. I like Dallas's rotation way too much. I don't think giving up what they've got going on makes sense. Houston doesn't make a ton of sense to me. I mean, yeah, probably the most sense out of any of these destinations because you can make the money work with like a Van Vliet or Dylan Brooks and some other stuff. And then Golden State. I don't want to give up Wiggins with how he's been playing basketball right now. I don't know if there's a gap between a Wiggins and a Jimmy Butler is large enough to warn't doing that. So I'll open the floor to you guys. First of all, are there any destinations that make sense? But more importantly to me, what would you realistically give up to get Jimmy Butler? Because I don't think his I think his value is probably an all time low right now.

I couldn't agree more with your last point. I think basketball wise, the best possible fit is Golden State. I think they can use his game beautifully. I think the motion system, paired with his ability to mismatch Hunt go for like deep post seals, and then like the fact that he can also initiate actions as a passer as a creator, I think Golden State desperately needs a second shot creator on the perimeter to get to that level, and I think in the playoffs that's what Jimmy's proven to be. I don't know how reliable that still is at this age, but I totally agree. The only way it works is if you get rid of Wiggins, and I just don't. I think Wiggins is playing the best basketball of his career right now. I think Wiggins has looked phenomenal, and so the only way that would make sense to me is if it is a three team deal where you're getting more than just Jimmy like, if you have to get rid of Wiggins, Moody and Kyle Anderson, Jimmy cannot be the only return. It just simply would not be worth it. I saw someone float the idea of a third team being the Wolves, like Wiggins would be a phenomenal fit with the Wolves and then maybe you can kind of get some of that back with Like I don't.

Even know, man, I I don't like.

I don't like the idea of trading Wiggins just because I think he's been I think, like Steph Wiggins Draymond is like the three that you want to build around, not trade one of them and think that'llit, that'll take take you to the next level. So, like I said, I think the best basketball fit for is Jamie. I do think, like you said, the best trade makes that makes the most sense would be Houston because of their contract situations. But yeah, it's it's tough for me. It's tough for me to see a pathway like Beal Beal from.

The Suns, Like would that make sense? I don't.

I don't know, man, I don't really see like a team that would. It's kind of like what we talked about with Denver. What team actually would make move. It would move the needle for them to get Jimmy Butler.

I don't know well, and I think what Miami's looking for is gonna be a young asset or significant draft capital, and that's what makes this even a little bit stranger. Now, Houston certainly can offer that in spades, and I'm all for Houston at some point making a consolidating move and saying, Okay, we don't need all of these young, talented players, and eventually we're not gonna be able to afford paying all these guys, and we do clearly need a legit offensive Number One is Jimmy Butler. That guy, though, like thirty five year old, fifty million dollar Jimmy Butler, who you're going to have to pay after this season because the report is he would opt out of the contract in Miami. I don't see why it'd be different anywhere else. Like I presume he wants same as PG, right, he wants a four year deal somewhere.

If I'm Houston and I'm as young as they are, I'm.

Just not investing that in Jimmy Butler, especially because even though I do think that they need that offensive number one, I also don't think that they need another guy who isn't a volume three point shooter, because shooting is a bit of a question for them. I also think availability is a huge question with Jimmy. Like if I'm Houston, I like the spot I'm in. I'm waiting for a trade that I think is more advantageous, that makes more sense long term when I'm really trying to do my upgrade the Warriors one, Tyler, I don't think I'm as high on the fit as you are, even though I think Golden State desperately needs a second high offensive creator, I much prefer a Zach Levine. I do think he's a much cleaner fit in that system with his three point shooting, with his ability to move away from the ball, Like I just think Jimmy is inherently something of a ball stopper. I think that Jimmy is also, again a guy who is not going to shoot from three with any sort of real volume. Like I don't know how much he would fit into the motion system. I think that that could be kind of ad Odds the Warriors fundamental philosophy with Jimmy's play style. And then I also just think that you can't give up Wiggins, and like my proposition for them trying to get Levine as basically give up Hella depth. I mean, give up Melton's contract, who obviously can't play anymore, but make the money work. Give up Kaminga, give up Pods if you need to. I've been so disappointed with Pods this year. But like, throw in five of those mid level contracts because I still think your depth would be solid, and then you would solve your biggest issue. But I'm definitely not giving up Wiggins to get Jimmy and honestly, I don't love that fit. And then Dallas. Dallas doesn't have bad contracts on the books, Like there's nobody there paying who I'm like, oh yeah, that guy's expendable. Like, if you're gonna try to find fifty million in cap, how do you do that without giving up a Klay Thompson or a PJ. Washington or Daniel Gaffert, Like you're not paying bad basketball players. Kleiba is the only one at eleven million that is like kind of expendable. Okay, great, you need to find thirty seven million.

More.

Like I like Dallas's structure too much as a basketball team to really compromise that to bring in Jimmy. So I don't like any of these. I'm with you, Logan. I think Miami would love to trade Jimmy or they should, like they need to choose a direction. They're not good enough right now.

But I don't see.

The team where he's like a clean fit when you consider some of the clunkiness in terms of his play style, lack of floor spacing, age, lack of availability, questions about how much can he level up in the playoffs, Like is that something that we can just still presume he can do with this age?

I don't think.

So It's kind of tough to find a spot for I'm locked up one trade you guys, let me know what you think about it. And I don't love this, to be clear, just because it cuts their rotation. I mocked up Memphis actually because they could make the money work. And the only way you do that is you got to give up Marcus Smart, you got to give up Brandon Clark, you got to give up Luke Canard, and you got to give up John conchar And I think it might be worthwhile for Memphis. The only reason I push back is cause it's like, what's in it for Miami. You know, I don't know why Miami would pull the trigger on this. I guess to recoup some assets because Jimmy's gonna leave. Memphis was the one that had enough players with mid sized contracts where you could throw it together. So that's the only destination that kind of makes sense to them.

I came up with another one that I think is kind of interesting, and I almost wonder if it does move the needle for them. The Calves could trade LeVert, Strus and Akoro for Jimmy Butler, and then they'd have a starting five of Garland, Mitchell, Butler, Mobley and Allen.

Would that not be.

A Boston like?

Could they not compete with Boston if they had Jimmy at the three?

I would do that, and I mean their wing depth already, like they have enough dudes who can play. Obviously, you'd keep Dean Wade, you would compromise a decent bit of this.

Keep Ty Jerome too, who's a superstar.

Absolute superstar for Julia Legend, Ty Jerome.

Keep sam Merril.

Sam Merril can play minutes for you, Jayleen Tyson. They're not ready for the Jalen Tyson breakout.

I actually really like.

Him, probably not this year, but I think that he's a rotation level wing talent.

I think that you need a little.

Bit more firepower if you're Cleveland for me to like you in a series against Boston, because Boston.

That's that to me is the one that to me is the one I think. I think if there was a destination where Jimmy Butler maybe moves the needle, I do think Cleveland is the one because I think Cleveland is right there, like they're so close.

Yeah, it's a little weird because you have on ball perimeter player, on ball perimeter player on ball perimeter player, and then.

You have obviously your two bigs.

But I think with the offensive leap Mobley's taken, I think that that's probably a pretty good offensive group, and you just have so much creation on the floor, and you still have a bunch of different lineup combinations. As we've seen they've been able to deploy throughout the year. It fits right basically any one of their perimeter guard initiators with any one of their bigs, and now you put Jimmy in any of the those lineups with a Dean Wade and a Merrill or a Dean Wade and a ty Jerome, Like, there's a lot of good complimentary looks in there. The starting five fit isn't the cleanest straight up, but it's also not like untenable, and there's so much talent there. And again from that point forward, it's just like finding the right mix and match of offensive creation and rim protection in shooting in perimeter defense, and I think they have the personnel to find those combinations.

I like that. I like that a lot.

I think the three point shooting would be the big concern, like can they win the math game against Boston, But like Jimmy, Mobley and Allen might be the best defensive front court in a long time.

That is nasty.

That is nasty.

But I agree with the three point volume, and I think mobilely there would probably have to take a couple more threes.

Yeah, but it allows Jimmy to kind of come in there and play a role, like he doesn't have to lead the offense out like he would in Miami in a playoff series. I don't think it allows Jimmy to conserve his energy a little bit. I uh.

I think Jimmy has a lot of like very underrated off ball skills too, like I think he's the best offensive rebounding wing in the league. I think he's really good playing out of the dunker spot. I think he's a I think he's a great cutter.

Of Men Thompson. I forgot Thoms. Yeah, shout out of Men Thompson. But Jimmy.

I think Jimmy has like playoff series reaverages, like three offensive rebounds.

He's he's seriously good at that.

And I think like duckins, like little duckins, Like, I think he's really good at just finding pockets in the defense. I do agree with your point, like when he does have the ball in his hands, I do think he can stop it a lot. But I do think in terms of like when other guys are handling the ball, Jim's Jimmy's constantly looking for advantages by just like floating around finding saft spots. And I think, like if if they just basically asked him to do that, and then Cleveland doesn't have a mismatch weapon, I think Mobley with his leap kind of is Jimmy's just like an absurd mismatch weapon. And I think, like we saw in the Milwaukee series, like if you go against Boston, you can get Jimmy switched on to White or Drew Holliday and they're just not big enough to deal with him in the mid post. And I think that'd be a serious advantage for them in that series, one hundred percent.

And I think it's also like what Logan said, right, I mean, Jimmy can just hone in on doing what he does best, and he can fully commit himself to the defensive end of the floor, and he can pick his spots offensively, specifically as that mismatch attacker, because Mitchell and Garland can do so much overall creation. I like that The question is, will Jimmy Butler be willing to go live in Cleveland? OHI No, I don't know. Yeah, But in terms of just if we were in our basketball utopia where basketball fit was all that mattered, I think that that's my favorite of definitely any of the options that we threw out there today. One more thing we want to discuss here, because I think that this is a pretty interesting topic. The Pacific Division this year has been a lot like the NFC West and Football. Actually it's regional counterpart, where it's the closest division in the sport and you have a lot of teams that are very solid, but you don't have anybody that has separated themselves from the pack that has shown themselves to be a great So, Tyler, I'll start with you, now that we're a little more than a quarter of the way into the season, who do you think is the best team in the Pacific.

This might be a scorching hot take, but we were just talking about basketball utopia. So I'm going to go out on a limb and say that I think the Clippers with Kawhi and the lineup are the best team in that division, like, no question for me. I Actually I think I said I think I said him on record saying that the Clippers with last year's version of Kawhi in an ideal world are my number two team in the West.

Wow.

So I'm yeah, I'm I'm very high on the on the way, They've maybe not number two now that I've gotten higher in Dallas, so maybe I'll throw them at three. But uh yeah, I think the Clippers with Kawhi are pretty easily Now realistically, I don't really think that's a thing. So I'm gonna I'm gonna go with the Suns with kd I think the Sons with Kevin Durant and the lineup are the or the Warriors. Yeah, this is a good topic because I don't even know now. Now, I will say I think the Lakers and King the two worst. I think it comes down to the other three. I think I'm gonna go with the Suns with KD. If the Warriors make a trade for a second creator, they'd move up that to number one for me, and then uh, the Clippers with Kawhi would be my unequivocal number one.

Doesn't exist sadly yet's fantasy.

I'm gonna say it's Golden State.

Yeah.

And if I had two dark horse teams, like like really really dark horse teams to win the title this year, I would take Minnesota would be my number one pick, and then I would take Golden State. And I agree, I agree with you. I think they would have to make a move to acquire somebody that would open up like a real legitimate championship window. But I still like their recipe. You know, you would need superstar Steph Curry for a playoff run again, but Draymond can answer your defense. That can be great on that end. And I really like how up tempo Golden State plays like them in transition. On offense, they get out on the break. On defense, they get back and set up. I really like their depth, and a lot of games that the Warriors lose, it's the most frustrating thing about them. They just have to avoid self inflicted wounds. It's like, and that's been the Warriors for a couple of years. But they just sometimes they just melt down, you know. Sometimes it's other things. Sometimes they don't have the size. Sometimes they don't have the shock creation that you need top to bottom. And Buddy Heals cooled down a little bit lately. But a lot of games it's just turnovers, mindless turnovers that you get from Golden State. To me, the Sun's defense is still suspect. The Lakers are lazy and inconsistent, the Clippers are too relyant on James Harden, and the Kings of the Kings.

So the Kings are the Kings, Kings of.

The Browns are the Browns. Man, I think it's Golden State again. Like if I had a dark horse team, it would be Minnesota and Golden State. I think I've got Golden State at number five in the West right now.

That's fair.

That's fair.

It's close for me, and a couple of weeks ago, I was thinking that I slightly prefer Golden State to Phoenix. What's changed is I've gotten lower on Golden State, and the reason for that is I think the offensive limitations that we would have expected to be a problem before the year have just become more apparent. Right And I was really excited about what we were seeing from Buddy Healed. He obviously has not maintained close to the offensive production that he was giving you early in the year. The defense is awesome, and I want to be clear, I'm still not out on the Warriors.

Like I've seen a lot.

Of people who are sort of doing a victory lap on oh, fake start, this team sucks. I do not think that that's the case. I think that their defense gives them a really high floor because they're top five there, and I think having Steph Curry on your offense gives you a really.

High offensive floor. Like I still think they're.

Gonna be an average offense, but early in the year I thought that they had a bit more of a punch they could throw there because everything was just flowing so beautifully and Steph was playing so well and Buddy was playing so well and the shooting overall was so good, and the depth was so impressive. Now last ten games, they're twenty sixth in offensive rating, and there's just been some games that are like unwatchable outside of Steph. They have almost a one twenty two offensive rating with Steph on the floor, but a one to two offensive rating with Steph off the floor. And even when Steph is on the floor, man, Like, it's just crippling sometimes, the fact that nobody else can create an advantage off the dribble.

It's the same thing that's been an issue for the Warriors for years.

That was always going to be their biggest question mark offensively, and I think that they need to address that. I think they need too much out of Buddy for what he can actually provide. Pods, Man, I've been so disappointed with Pods, Like, I really thought he was gonna have a good season because I like so much about his game. But when he is shooting twenty four percent from three and looks tentative out there and is a super limited athlete, like, he's just been absolutely brutal as a scorer, and they need somebody like that, right, somebody that can at least handle and shoot and make decisions as a passer to step up. But Pods has not been close to that guy, so I would I'm with you, Tyler. I mean, if they hit on a trade, I think that they soar to by far my number one team in this division, yeacause I don't believe in healthy Kawhi Leonard unfortunately, and the Sons just don't have nearly that room for improvement. I don't love the Suns. They are eleven and two when KD plays. They won a lot of clutch games, Like their net rating isn't insane with Katie on the floor, but eleven and two is still impressive. And they're one and nine when he doesn't, which I think is just a testament to what an unbelievable all around player he is at this age.

And like, I think, not to cut you off, men, Yeah, I think KD is like second with no minimums. I think he's like second and defensive field goal percentage or something inside six feet, dude.

He's been unbelievable.

Unbelievable inside of ten feet, players are shooting eighteen percent below their average.

Like he's so important on both sides of the ball.

As being a big forward right who can bring some of that rim protection and rebounding value defensively and then offensively, I mean obviously being the best scorer on the team, but also just being such a seamless fit and basically any offense in NBA history, and how amazing he's been in the clutch this year when he's been out there, they are actually a seventy fourth percentile defense when he plays, And that's what I hold out hope for with the Suns. I think they can find those lineup combinations where you get Booked and kd out there, and you get Royce O'Neil out there, and you get Ryan Dunn, and you've got a bunch of athleticism at least compared to all your other lineups out there defensively, and you've got some versatile wings, and you've got enough offensively. Because I think Roys O'Neil has been really good for them with what he is defensively and how well he shot the ball done. Obviously the offense and the shot is more of a question, but it's been good enough for me to play him when he's the weapon he is defensively.

The one thing that sucks for the Suns is the center spot. Yeah, there's just no fixing that. There's no fixing that on this roster.

I don't think there's a trade to fix that, unless what was it that I threw out there where they could trade Nirk with some draft capital to get Vooch. But that certainly doesn't fix your defense. That just makes your defense even worse. But at least you'd be getting real offensive value from the center spot. That's what holds me back with Phoenix, and that's where it's like the defensive ceiling with Golden State is so much higher. But I just trust Phoenix's offensive more and I think they can find the defensive lineups that.

Work well enough.

And Katie and Book are kind of a tiebreaker just having that sort of high end talent, Whereas it's like, man, I feel for Steph Curry because Wiggins has been good, but obviously he's not a true offensive number two, and there's just nobody who can do that for them.

Yeah, I dude, I couldn't have said it better like the way you described. It's like the Suns maybe right now, just as things currently stand, probably are a better team, but the Warriors have so many more pathways to like hitting that next echelon. And I think I think the big thing is we saw the ceiling of the Warriors team when Buddy healed was basically the offensive number two that they need. We saw how good they were. So if like you get like a zach Lavine, like you mentioned, a guy who can consistently do that, I even thought about brandon Ingram as a guy that they could go after because they'll probably the Pelicans.

I don't know what's going on there.

I think like we saw the ceiling of the team with a true offensive number two, and they were like a contender level team, like a top five team in the league. So yeah, I'm with you there. I think the center position for Phoenix is really rough. I don't like that against pretty much any playoff team that they would potentially run into.

So yeah, I think I think you kind of talked me into it.

I was kind of on the border, but I think I would go with the Warriors, Sons right behind them, and then like Clippers whatever they got going on, and then Lakers Kings.

Is there any case for the Lakers to be made because of the eighty Lebron.

Fast I'm kind of over it. Man, I just think I made a tweet.

I made a tweet yesterday that I said, we're in an era of basketball where three through seven is probably more important than one through two. The Lakers have the worst three through seven maybe in the league. It's just not good besides, like the tanking teams like the Washington Washington Port, I mean, like of any serious team, although the Lakers probably shouldn't be considered serious at this point.

So I don't know, man, I don't know.

If they got the timestone, uh from from Infinity War. I think they could do it. They get an old version of Lebron it is.

I agree.

I'm glad you bring that up. I was thinking about that the other night. The league is just so deep nowadays, Like I think that that's why the NBA, in my opinion, is the most interesting sport to I don't know, discuss and watch is like won The league's never been more talented, but every team is so deep. They have so many good basketball players. I just think we're reaching like a point with the league where it's gonna be completely unpredictable right like in I don't know. I guess having the best player in the world isn't nearly as important as it was like ten years ago or something like that, because everybody's so talented top to bottom. But now I'm LA sucks man, I'm over LA.

I think even more so than the talent of the three through seven, what's disastrous is.

The roster composition.

And I think that we've been able to see that for the last couple of years. I mean, I thought that this defense could be better than it is, but the fact that they're a bottom five defense in the league with Anthony Davis is an abomination.

And I'm not saying Anthony Davis.

Has played to his peak abilities defensively, but the defensive roster they've put around him is a complete disaster. So like, I really like Reeves. I think he's a legit offensive number three. I'm always gonna be a believer in Ruyhachi Mura offensively. Dalton connect obviously has been a super impressive offensive player. But it's like, when you have one of the absolute worst perimeter defenses in basketball and one of the absolute worst transition defenses in basketball, avenue to be able to really accomplish that's also fair. That's also fair, And they just don't play with nearly the regular season effort of like all these other teams that are in the playoff race, so it's tough. I think I've gotten lower on the Lakers as the year's gone along, because, like all their issues have just become bigger and bigger issues, and there's no way for them to get better unless they've changed the personnel on this roster.

Tyler, it was an absolute delight to have you.

Always love having you on, always love getting your opinion inside on all this stuff. I would have loved if we could have gone three hours to get your take on the top ten peaks in NBA History list that Logan and I both did last week, because we've had some really fun historic conversations with you, specifically about Jokic versus some of these other twenty first century guys. But I know that you're someone who really has that historical knowledge. Maybe some other time, maybe we'll do that in the offseason, because I think there's some great conversations to be had there. But unfortunately we can't go three hours today.

We gotta let you go.

Everybody, go check out Hoop You on YouTube, phenomenal content. Go follow Hoop Venue and Tyler on Twitter. What's you're at on Twitter, Tyler.

My I got hoop Venue Underscore and Tyler Britton Underscore.

So just my names.

If you look up any of my names on any platform, you'll find something so phenomenal.

Phenomenal and go check out the hoop Venue podcast. Welcome to the business, buddy. It's tough, it's cutthroat. I'm not gonna lie to you. You're gonna have to leave a lot of blood, sweat and tears out there.

I enjoy the unscripted content though. It's good to just get into a room and just talk, just talk things out.

Yeah, yeah, that's the beauty of it. We're just out here yapping, yeah for a couple hours. If you guys want more of our stuff, you probably know where to find it. But if you don't follow us across social media, TikTok, Instagram, at Nerd says Twitter, at nerd underscore sess to see clips from our show, graphics from our show in all of our short form trivia content. If you want more full episodes of the show like this, these are all on YouTube. You can also find our own video breakdown content like what I mentioned about Triple Jay on our YouTube channel, and we also do that for the NFL. Logan's been doing a great job with that, and we've got a bunch of NFL shows here as well. That's all on our YouTube channel and all of our full shows are across audio platforms, and if you want to check out our merch the link to that is at the link tree across our social media bios at breakingt dot com. And you can also join our discord if you want to chat with the gang. Always a fun community to be a part of in my opinion. The link to that is also at the link tree across our social media bios. So with that, one last big shout out to Tyler, I've been Carson Braber, I

Have been Logan, Caanden and this was Nerves Sash