A lawyer had been ordered to pay $800 to his client’s opponent in a civil suit after a non-existent case generated by an artificial intelligence (AI) tool was found in his court documents.
Now this is considered a landmark case, as law firms here are treating breaches of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) policies as potentially sackable offences. So what does this mean now?
On The Big Story, Hongbin Jeong speaks with Tris Xavier, Associate Director and Head of the Integrated Property Practice Group at Yuen Law LLC, to find out more.

Budget 2026: Can businesses and workers keep up with Singapore’s AI ambitions?
16:34

Wealth Tracker: The $99 Trillion Question - Why Asian families struggle to plan their wealth
19:50

What's Trending: Is it still safe to cross the Causeway amid Malaysia’s TB outbreaks?
09:50