Questions are now being raised about accountability inside South Africa’s criminal justice system after the extortion case against alleged taxi boss Joe “Ferrari” Sibanyoni and three co-accused was struck off the court roll — not because evidence was tested, but because of delays linked to the state itself. The matter took a dramatic turn at the Kwaggafontein Magistrate’s Court when prosecutor Mkhuselo Ntaba failed to appear despite reportedly informing the court beforehand that he would not be able to attend. The magistrate not only struck the case off the roll due to what was described as an unreasonable delay, but also held the prosecutor in contempt of court and issued a warrant for his arrest. Now the National Prosecuting Authority says it is studying the ruling and considering its next steps — raising wider questions about prosecutorial conduct, court management, and whether high-profile criminal matters are being undermined by procedural failures. To help us unpack the legal implications of this decision, the powers available to the NPA, and what this means for the future of the case against Joe “Ferrari” Sibanyoni and his co-accused.