A fresh constitutional and political battle is brewing in Parliament after President Cyril Ramaphosa moved to halt the National Assembly's impeachment inquiry process. The president has approached the Western Cape High Court seeking an interdict to prevent Parliament's impeachment committee from proceeding while his review application against the Section 89 Independent Panel report is being considered. But ActionSA has hit back, accusing Ramaphosa of using the same legal tactics employed by former president Jacob Zuma to delay accountability. The party argues that
Parliament's constitutional duty to exercise oversight cannot be suspended by litigation and is calling on lawmakers to resist what it describes as an attempt by the executive to undermine parliamentary independence. Tonight, we examine the legal, political and constitutional implications of this latest showdown.

A fresh constitutional and political battle is brewing in Parliament&nbsp;after President Cyril Ramaphosa moved to halt the National&nbsp;Assembly's impeachment inquiry process. The president has&nbsp;approached the Western Cape High Court seeking an interdict to&nbsp;prevent Parliament's impeachment committee from proceeding while&nbsp;his review application against the Section 89 Independent Panel&nbsp;report is being considered. But ActionSA has hit back, accusing&nbsp;Ramaphosa of using the same legal tactics employed by former&nbsp;president Jacob Zuma to delay accountability. The party argues that Parliament's constitutional duty to exercise oversight cannot be&nbsp;suspended by litigation and is calling on lawmakers to resist what it&nbsp;describes as an attempt by the executive to undermine parliamentary independence. Tonight, we examine the legal, political&nbsp;and constitutional implications of this latest showdown.

METRO FM Talk with Faith Mangope