Newly released testimony from an IRS whistleblower provides revealing details about how the Department of Justice (DOJ) prevented the Hunter Biden investigation from moving forward. The House Ways and Means Committee has voted to make transcripts of the testimony public, just days after Hunter Biden was found guilty of numerous offenses.

Gary Shapley, a supervisory special agent with the IRS, provided testimony that highlights misconduct by DOJ officials during the course of the yearslong Hunter Biden investigation. Another whistleblower also gave testimony that was released this week. These testimonies illustrate the disparity between how former President Trump was treated by the DOJ and how Hunter Biden has been treated, despite apparent evidence against him.

Hunter Biden first came under scrutiny in 2018 due to another investigation into an online pornography platform that had foreign links. Even though Hunter's bank reports showed evidence of his connection to a potential prostitution ring, IRS supervisors and DOJ officials hesitated to open a case against him.

When the case was finally opened, DOJ officials sought to keep it from proceeding. Allegedly, high-ranking Delaware U.S. Attorney General's office and DOJ officials provided Hunter Biden preferential treatment. These officials had unchecked conflicts of interest during the high-profile investigation.

The IRS team investigating Hunter Biden signaled in March 2020 that they had enough probable cause to seek physical search warrants in California, Arkansas, New York, and Washington, D.C., as well as to conduct 15 interviews. However, the case stalled and only moved forward when the IRS team accessed Hunter's iCloud in August 2020.

Investigators found messages that required more investigation. One such message was a 2017 text from Hunter to Henry Zhao, a Chinese Communist Party official, explicitly mentioning the involvement of Joe Biden. In August 2020, a search warrant led to the discovery of a text between Hunter and Henry Zhao, a Chinese company executive who paid Hunter $100,000, where Joe Biden was mentioned repeatedly.

The DOJ only brought charges against Hunter Biden for tax crimes committed during the years he filed returns in Delaware. Two previous years, 2014 and 2015, when Hunter Biden filed taxes in Washington, DC, no charges were filed. The DOJ inexplicably delayed any ability for prosecutors to ask the U.S. attorney for the Central District of California for permission to charge Hunter Biden for these years until September 2022.

That same month, President Joe Biden’s appointee for that office was confirmed and subsequently denied the request. The DOJ repeatedly presented Sahar Weiss as the sole authority in the Hunter Biden investigations, despite whistleblowers testifying that her efforts to charge Hunter Biden were obstructed.

The recent Hunter Biden case raises serious concerns about the DOJ's impartiality, particularly regarding high-profile investigations. The conduct of DOJ officials in this case has been questionable, at best, and conservative analysts have drawn attention to the obvious disparities between the treatment of Hunter Biden and how President Trump was treated. Additionally, the case illustrates how important it is that our legal system is held to high standards, irrespective of how well-connected the individual or their family might be.

The ongoing Hunter Biden saga highlights troubling issues that must be addressed. The IRS whistleblowers' testimonies have revealed the extent to which DOJ officials obstructed this investigation and highlight how much easier it is for some individuals to evade accountability. This case also underscores the importance of whistleblowers in calling out questionable behavior that can be seen at the highest levels of our government. Their bravery provides a revealing look into how our government operates, and can potentially help to prevent corruption and abuse of power.

Hunter Biden's story is the latest example of how political power and influence can help some people skirt the law. While Hunter Biden has been let off the hook for his misdeeds, others are not so lucky. Many Americans face ruthless legal persecution for minor offenses or are subject to punishment based solely on their background or social standing. This glaring disparity in our justice system is a cause for great concern and must be addressed.

The Hunter Biden case has drawn widespread attention due to its high-profile nature and the apparent lack of accountability for Hunter's alleged actions. The sheer amount of evidence amassed by the IRS and the FBI in the course of their investigation illustrates just how significant this case was. The DOJ's apparent lack of action against Hunter Biden has understandably led many Americans to question the integrity of our justice system, particularly when people of influence or political clout are involved in the case. The case therefore offers an opportunity to reflect on the need for transparency and fairness in how legal issues are handled.

The Hunter Biden affair illustrates a disturbing trend of political corruption in our government. It appears that officials often put their political agendas ahead of accountability to the public. The DOJ's perceived unwillingness to prosecute Hunter Biden speaks volumes about the extent of the problem. The Hunter Biden case has highlighted the need for robust and effective watchdogs to ensure that people in power are held accountable for their actions. Without them, it's unlikely that justice will be served in high-stakes cases like this one.

Recent revelations surrounding Hunter Biden's business dealings raise serious questions about the ethics of certain political figures. The revelations suggest that certain individuals use their connections to avoid legal accountability, while other American citizens are held to much higher standards. This is unacceptable in a democratic society. The Biden case can be seen as a reminder of the need to ensure that people in power are held accountable to the same standards as the rest of us.

The Hunter Biden case is yet another example of the dysfunction that plagues our political and legal systems. The case suggests that political influence can be a powerful tool for individuals seeking to evade accountability. Moreover, it underscores how difficult it can be for whistleblowers to come forward and reveal corruption or misconduct at the highest levels of government. While the case has many troubling aspects, it also highlights the brave efforts of the IRS whistleblowers who stepped forward to bring attention to this issue.

The Hunter Biden case has been the subject of much scrutiny, for good reason. It is an example of how political corruption can undermine the integrity of our legal system. The Hunter Biden affair illustrates the importance of doing our part to ensure that the government operates in an open and transparent manner, with accountability at all levels. By doing so, we can help to promote a system in which all Americans are treated fairly and justly.

The Hunter Biden case has raised serious questions about the efficacy of our legal system in holding those in power accountable. It reveals yet again the power of political corruption and the lengths to which those with connections will go to avoid consequences. The case therefore serves as a reminder of the importance of a free and independent press, which can help shine a light on shady dealings and promote openness and transparency in government.

The Hunter Biden case is a cautionary tale about the dangers of allowing political influence to override the public good. The revelations indicate that certain individuals in power can use their clout to avoid accountability for their actions. Meanwhile, ordinary Americans are often held to much higher standards. The case is yet another reminder of the need for greater transparency and accountability in our political and legal systems.

The Hunter Biden case has sparked an important conversation about the role of political influence in our legal system. It highlights the need for a more robust anti-corruption framework to ensure that people in power aren't able to circumvent the law. Additionally, it suggests that we must do more to empower whistleblowers to come forward and report misconduct or corruption when they see it. By doing so, we can help promote a more transparent and accountable government that serves the best interests of all Americans.

The Hunter Biden case is a stark reminder of how powerful political influence can be. It speaks to the need for greater transparency and accountability in our government and legal system, particularly when it comes to issues that involve people in positions of authority or influence. At its core, the case is a wakeup call to all Americans that we must do more to ensure that everyone, regardless of their connections or standing, is held to the same standard of accountability and transparency.

Newly released testimony from an IRS whistleblower provides revealing details about how the Department of Justice (DOJ) prevented the Hunter Biden investigation from moving forward. The House Ways and Means Committee has voted to make transcripts of the testimony public, just days after Hunter Biden was found guilty of numerous offenses.
Gary Shapley, a supervisory special agent with the IRS, provided testimony that highlights misconduct by DOJ officials during the course of the yearslong Hunter Biden investigation. Another whistleblower also gave testimony that was released this week. These testimonies illustrate the disparity between how former President Trump was treated by the DOJ and how Hunter Biden has been treated, despite apparent evidence against him.
Hunter Biden first came under scrutiny in 2018 due to another investigation into an online pornography platform that had foreign links. Even though Hunter's bank reports showed evidence of his connection to a potential prostitution ring, IRS supervisors and DOJ officials hesitated to open a case against him.
When the case was finally opened, DOJ officials sought to keep it from proceeding. Allegedly, high-ranking Delaware U.S. Attorney General's office and DOJ officials provided Hunter Biden preferential treatment. These officials had unchecked conflicts of interest during the high-profile investigation.
The IRS team investigating Hunter Biden signaled in March 2020 that they had enough probable cause to seek physical search warrants in California, Arkansas, New York, and Washington, D.C., as well as to conduct 15 interviews. However, the case stalled and only moved forward when the IRS team accessed Hunter's iCloud in August 2020.
Investigators found messages that required more investigation. One such message was a 2017 text from Hunter to Henry Zhao, a Chinese Communist Party official, explicitly mentioning the involvement of Joe Biden. In August 2020, a search warrant led to the discovery of a text between Hunter and Henry Zhao, a Chinese company executive who paid Hunter $100,000, where Joe Biden was mentioned repeatedly.
The DOJ only brought charges against Hunter Biden for tax crimes committed during the years he filed returns in Delaware. Two previous years, 2014 and 2015, when Hunter Biden filed taxes in Washington, DC, no charges were filed. The DOJ inexplicably delayed any ability for prosecutors to ask the U.S. attorney for the Central District of California for permission to charge Hunter Biden for these years until September 2022.
That same month, President Joe Biden’s appointee for that office was confirmed and subsequently denied the request. The DOJ repeatedly presented Sahar Weiss as the sole authority in the Hunter Biden investigations, despite whistleblowers testifying that her efforts to charge Hunter Biden were obstructed.
The recent Hunter Biden case raises serious concerns about the DOJ's impartiality, particularly regarding high-profile investigations. The conduct of DOJ officials in this case has been questionable, at best, and conservative analysts have drawn attention to the obvious disparities between the treatment of Hunter Biden and how President Trump was treated. Additionally, the case illustrates how important it is that our legal system is held to high standards, irrespective of how well-connected the individual or their family might be.
The ongoing Hunter Biden saga highlights troubling issues that must be addressed. The IRS whistleblowers' testimonies have revealed the extent to which DOJ officials obstructed this investigation and highlight how much easier it is for some individuals to evade accountability. This case also underscores the importance of whistleblowers in calling out questionable behavior that can be seen at the highest levels of our government. Their bravery provides a revealing look into how our government operates, and can potentially help to prevent corruption and abuse of power.
Hunter Biden's story is the latest example of how political power and influence can help some people skirt the law. While Hunter Biden has been let off the hook for his misdeeds, others are not so lucky. Many Americans face ruthless legal persecution for minor offenses or are subject to punishment based solely on their background or social standing. This glaring disparity in our justice system is a cause for great concern and must be addressed.
The Hunter Biden case has drawn widespread attention due to its high-profile nature and the apparent lack of accountability for Hunter's alleged actions. The sheer amount of evidence amassed by the IRS and the FBI in the course of their investigation illustrates just how significant this case was. The DOJ's apparent lack of action against Hunter Biden has understandably led many Americans to question the integrity of our justice system, particularly when people of influence or political clout are involved in the case. The case therefore offers an opportunity to reflect on the need for transparency and fairness in how legal issues are handled.
The Hunter Biden affair illustrates a disturbing trend of political corruption in our government. It appears that officials often put their political agendas ahead of accountability to the public. The DOJ's perceived unwillingness to prosecute Hunter Biden speaks volumes about the extent of the problem. The Hunter Biden case has highlighted the need for robust and effective watchdogs to ensure that people in power are held accountable for their actions. Without them, it's unlikely that justice will be served in high-stakes cases like this one.
Recent revelations surrounding Hunter Biden's business dealings raise serious questions about the ethics of certain political figures. The revelations suggest that certain individuals use their connections to avoid legal accountability, while other American citizens are held to much higher standards. This is unacceptable in a democratic society. The Biden case can be seen as a reminder of the need to ensure that people in power are held accountable to the same standards as the rest of us.
The Hunter Biden case is yet another example of the dysfunction that plagues our political and legal systems. The case suggests that political influence can be a powerful tool for individuals seeking to evade accountability. Moreover, it underscores how difficult it can be for whistleblowers to come forward and reveal corruption or misconduct at the highest levels of government. While the case has many troubling aspects, it also highlights the brave efforts of the IRS whistleblowers who stepped forward to bring attention to this issue.
The Hunter Biden case has been the subject of much scrutiny, for good reason. It is an example of how political corruption can undermine the integrity of our legal system. The Hunter Biden affair illustrates the importance of doing our part to ensure that the government operates in an open and transparent manner, with accountability at all levels. By doing so, we can help to promote a system in which all Americans are treated fairly and justly.
The Hunter Biden case has raised serious questions about the efficacy of our legal system in holding those in power accountable. It reveals yet again the power of political corruption and the lengths to which those with connections will go to avoid consequences. The case therefore serves as a reminder of the importance of a free and independent press, which can help shine a light on shady dealings and promote openness and transparency in government.
The Hunter Biden case is a cautionary tale about the dangers of allowing political influence to override the public good. The revelations indicate that certain individuals in power can use their clout to avoid accountability for their actions. Meanwhile, ordinary Americans are often held to much higher standards. The case is yet another reminder of the need for greater transparency and accountability in our political and legal systems.
The Hunter Biden case has sparked an important conversation about the role of political influence in our legal system. It highlights the need for a more robust anti-corruption framework to ensure that people in power aren't able to circumvent the law. Additionally, it suggests that we must do more to empower whistleblowers to come forward and report misconduct or corruption when they see it. By doing so, we can help promote a more transparent and accountable government that serves the best interests of all Americans.
The Hunter Biden case is a stark reminder of how powerful political influence can be. It speaks to the need for greater transparency and accountability in our government and legal system, particularly when it comes to issues that involve people in positions of authority or influence. At its core, the case is a wakeup call to all Americans that we must do more to ensure that everyone, regardless of their connections or standing, is held to the same standard of accountability and transparency.

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Real News Now Podcast

Real News Now Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

<a href="https://realnewsnow.com/">Real News Now</a> Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

Advertisement