Florida Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) discoursed about the issues of democracy in America during his recent appearance on NBC's 'Meet The Press.' Rubio posited that it is not his party, the Republicans, but rather the Democrats who are aiming to destabilize the democratic fabric of our nation. When probed about accepting the 2024 election results 'no matter what,' Rubio was resolute in his stance, stating, 'No. If it's an unfair election, I think it's going to be contested.' An unequivocal stand undoubtedly aligning with any citizen's rightful view – nobody should accept election results ‘no matter what,' especially when anomalies are suspected.

It stands to reason that Rubio's skepticism isn't born of pessimism, but a necessary vigilance in maintaining electoral integrity. Queries that assume elections are beyond reproach or any potential meddling are fundamentally flawed. This erroneous belief is very far from reality, and assume there can't possibly be any threat to the sanctity of our democratic processes. Such assumptions are naively optimistic, even more so given that these are notions even the far-fetched Left doesn't fully endorse.

In fact, the Left, for a considerable period – close to four years followed the 2016 election – vehemently questioned its result. It was a result they disputed, though devoid of any concrete justification. This lays the groundwork for Rubio's succeeding comments where he drew attention to an intriguing pattern amongst Democrats, who vehemently opposed each Republican triumph since the turn of the millennium.

Florida Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) discoursed about the issues of democracy in America during his recent appearance on NBC's 'Meet The Press.' Rubio posited that it is not his party, the Republicans, but rather the Democrats who are aiming to destabilize the democratic fabric of our nation. When probed about accepting the 2024 election results 'no matter what,' Rubio was resolute in his stance, stating, 'No. If it's an unfair election, I think it's going to be contested.' An unequivocal stand undoubtedly aligning with any citizen's rightful view – nobody should accept election results ‘no matter what,' especially when anomalies are suspected.
It stands to reason that Rubio's skepticism isn't born of pessimism, but a necessary vigilance in maintaining electoral integrity. Queries that assume elections are beyond reproach or any potential meddling are fundamentally flawed. This erroneous belief is very far from reality, and assume there can't possibly be any threat to the sanctity of our democratic processes. Such assumptions are naively optimistic, even more so given that these are notions even the far-fetched Left doesn't fully endorse.
In fact, the Left, for a considerable period – close to four years followed the 2016 election – vehemently questioned its result. It was a result they disputed, though devoid of any concrete justification. This lays the groundwork for Rubio's succeeding comments where he drew attention to an intriguing pattern amongst Democrats, who vehemently opposed each Republican triumph since the turn of the millennium.

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Real News Now Podcast

Real News Now Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

<a href="https://realnewsnow.com/">Real News Now</a> Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

Advertisement