One cannot help but notice the hesitation in Mark Penn's tone, a former Clinton advisor and pollster, during his recent Tuesday appearance on Fox News. Foreseeing the likely bias in CNN's staging of the upcoming political extravaganza, the debate between President Joe Biden and the former president, Donald Trump. Presumptive GOP nominee Trump directly presents a mismatch considering the moderators' perceived intentions – the reputable Dana Bash and Jake Tapper. Penn defined this disparity in a nutshell: Moderators on a mission to disfavor Trump.

Penn illustrated the motivations of the political moderators with openness, expressing concern about the potential bias that awaits Trump. Maintaining a neutral stance on the CNN platform seems daunting, especially when it comes to 'letting Trump off the hook.' A challenging predicament indeed for any moderator, as one would undoubtedly be the subject of heated scrutiny by fervent critics. An unfavorable position that any CNN moderator would seemingly prefer to avoid.

The DC Enquirer has previously shed light on the anti-Trump inclinations that accompany CNN moderator Jack Tapper, solidifying Penn's suspicions. The post-2020 election period was a revealing time in Tapper's career, revealing a stark bias against Trump. He boldly declared the end of their 'national nightmare' to his CNN audience, making his sentiments transparent.

Diving further in the past, the extract from 2020 portrays a downbeat phase, reflecting the narrative of numerous unavoidable mishaps, and notably, the indifference toward reliable facts and scientific reasoning. The message peeks especially during discussions on the pandemic. However, more than the lack of harnessing science efficiently, the disdain for truth and fact was most appalling during this period.