The issue at hand revolves around a former United States president's assertion about the potential irreversible harm to the nation if the Supreme Court does not uphold the doctrine of presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for official deeds. The Supreme Court, in a few months, is set to deliberate on a bid by the ex-president to have an ongoing federal lawsuit connected to election interference, dismissed on the grounds of immunity held by presidents.

Legal counsel for the said president, in a brief filed earlier in the week, made a case that the presidency cannot adequately operate nor maintain its crucial autonomy if it carries the risk of prosecution for decisions made while in office, post-tenure. The brief warns of a future where every president is held captive by the threat of ex post facto legal wranglings and retaliatory prosecutions.

Extending on this line of reason, the brief posits the potential of crippling every future president with a de facto threat of blackmail or extortion during their term, a looming specter of courtroom battles that could ensue for years after, brought forth by political adversaries.

The document proceeds to caution that the possibility of subsequent prosecution and subsequent imprisonment, could turn into a political weapon aimed at influencing the most delicate and contentious presidential choices - thereby diluting the strength, authority, and the decisive character that the American presidency is conventionally associated with.

The issue at hand revolves around a former United States president's assertion about the potential irreversible harm to the nation if the Supreme Court does not uphold the doctrine of presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for official deeds. The Supreme Court, in a few months, is set to deliberate on a bid by the ex-president to have an ongoing federal lawsuit connected to election interference, dismissed on the grounds of immunity held by presidents.
Legal counsel for the said president, in a brief filed earlier in the week, made a case that the presidency cannot adequately operate nor maintain its crucial autonomy if it carries the risk of prosecution for decisions made while in office, post-tenure. The brief warns of a future where every president is held captive by the threat of ex post facto legal wranglings and retaliatory prosecutions.
Extending on this line of reason, the brief posits the potential of crippling every future president with a de facto threat of blackmail or extortion during their term, a looming specter of courtroom battles that could ensue for years after, brought forth by political adversaries.
The document proceeds to caution that the possibility of subsequent prosecution and subsequent imprisonment, could turn into a political weapon aimed at influencing the most delicate and contentious presidential choices - thereby diluting the strength, authority, and the decisive character that the American presidency is conventionally associated with.

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Real News Now Podcast

Real News Now Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

<a href="https://realnewsnow.com/">Real News Now</a> Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

Advertisement