The recent advancements in the electoral intervention case involving former President Donald Trump, which counters the narrative he is striving for dismissal based on presidential immunity, have taken place at an impressively rapid pace.

This development comes despite assertions by several media outlets and leaning scholars who suggested the case was progressing at a snail's pace. Critics pointed at the Supreme Court for pronouncing its involvement in Trump's immunity appeal, suggesting it could have tackled the issue as far back as December. This was when Jack Smith, the special counsel, proposed the question without waiting for input from the lower court.

On the other end of the spectrum, various legal experts have advocated that the judicial system has improbably and considerably deviated from standard procedures in order to expedite the proceedings in Trump's case. They describe the pace of the events as 'lightning-fast'. Judge Tanya Chutkan denied Trump's early plea to have his case dismissed based on the grounds of presidential immunity in December 2023. This happened after nearly two months post Trump's filing.

Moreover, Trump's appeal was fast-tracked by the D.C. Circuit, which delivered its opinion within a month of hearing the oral arguments put forth. Following this, the Supreme Court agreed to review Trump's case merely two weeks after his application was submitted on February 12th. It then went ahead to schedule the oral arguments for the week of April 22nd.

Given the conventional procedures, the Supreme Court would typically put forth its decision at some point in early 2026. This court's involvement in fast-tracking the case stands in stark contrast to the misrepresentation by some sections of the media and certain left-leaning scholars.

The recent advancements in the electoral intervention case involving former President Donald Trump, which counters the narrative he is striving for dismissal based on presidential immunity, have taken place at an impressively rapid pace.
This development comes despite assertions by several media outlets and leaning scholars who suggested the case was progressing at a snail's pace. Critics pointed at the Supreme Court for pronouncing its involvement in Trump's immunity appeal, suggesting it could have tackled the issue as far back as December. This was when Jack Smith, the special counsel, proposed the question without waiting for input from the lower court.
On the other end of the spectrum, various legal experts have advocated that the judicial system has improbably and considerably deviated from standard procedures in order to expedite the proceedings in Trump's case. They describe the pace of the events as 'lightning-fast'. Judge Tanya Chutkan denied Trump's early plea to have his case dismissed based on the grounds of presidential immunity in December 2023. This happened after nearly two months post Trump's filing.
Moreover, Trump's appeal was fast-tracked by the D.C. Circuit, which delivered its opinion within a month of hearing the oral arguments put forth. Following this, the Supreme Court agreed to review Trump's case merely two weeks after his application was submitted on February 12th. It then went ahead to schedule the oral arguments for the week of April 22nd.
Given the conventional procedures, the Supreme Court would typically put forth its decision at some point in early 2026. This court's involvement in fast-tracking the case stands in stark contrast to the misrepresentation by some sections of the media and certain left-leaning scholars.

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Real News Now Podcast

Real News Now Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

<a href="https://realnewsnow.com/">Real News Now</a> Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!