In a recent legal document handed over to a federal court in Delaware, Special Counsel David Weiss unequivocally criticized Hunter Biden's proposition of subpoenaing Donald Trump and more ex-officials of his administration.

Weiss advocates that Biden's appeal devoids merits and hence, should be overturned. It's noteworthy that Hunter Biden, President Joe Biden's offspring, wished for the issuance of subpoenas directed at ex-President Trump, former Attorney General Bill Barr, among other former officials of Trump's tenure.

The rationale for this demand, as narrated by Hunter Biden, is induced by supposed vindictiveness from the Justice Department that led to his gun-related charges.

The Special Counsel went further to deconstruct any claims pertaining to partiality, spitefulness, or discriminatory motives on his part. Weiss articulated that nothing within the defendant's motion pointed towards any viable indication or evidence of such allegations.

Moreover, the defense's case sidesteps one substantial reality that lays bare a significant contradiction. Amid the previous administration, no legal action was initiated against the defendant, which directly contradicts the claim that the subpoena recipients held offices within the Executive Branch.

In a recent legal document handed over to a federal court in Delaware, Special Counsel David Weiss unequivocally criticized Hunter Biden's proposition of subpoenaing Donald Trump and more ex-officials of his administration.
Weiss advocates that Biden's appeal devoids merits and hence, should be overturned. It's noteworthy that Hunter Biden, President Joe Biden's offspring, wished for the issuance of subpoenas directed at ex-President Trump, former Attorney General Bill Barr, among other former officials of Trump's tenure.
The rationale for this demand, as narrated by Hunter Biden, is induced by supposed vindictiveness from the Justice Department that led to his gun-related charges.
The Special Counsel went further to deconstruct any claims pertaining to partiality, spitefulness, or discriminatory motives on his part. Weiss articulated that nothing within the defendant's motion pointed towards any viable indication or evidence of such allegations.
Moreover, the defense's case sidesteps one substantial reality that lays bare a significant contradiction. Amid the previous administration, no legal action was initiated against the defendant, which directly contradicts the claim that the subpoena recipients held offices within the Executive Branch.

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Real News Now Podcast

Real News Now Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

<a href="https://realnewsnow.com/">Real News Now</a> Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

Advertisement