The former U.S. President, Donald Trump, reinforced his position, labelling the case presented by New York's chief legal officer, Letitia James, as an 'unjustified pursuit designed to sway an election.' This statement follows the deposition of a key expert witness who affirmed there wasn't any confirming evidence that the potential candidate for the 2024 elections had engaged in fraudulent actions.

The court heard from Eli Bartov, an esteemed professor of accounting at a prominent institution, New York University. He firmly communicated his expert opinion on Thursday, stating categorically that no discernible evidence exists to validate claims of any accounting malpractice on Trump's part.

Letitia James, a notable figure from the Democratic party who has actively pursued legal action against Trump as part of her campaign commitments, initiated a civil case. In her allegations, she stated that the former president, his offspring, and the corporate entity known as the Trump Organization had significantly embellished their asset figures in financial reports by a staggering number that reached into the billions.

A relevant case point was brought up by Justice Arthur Engoron, who presides over the Supreme Court's 1st Judicial District in New York. He swiftly escalated the discussion about James' debatable evaluation of the Mar-a-Lago property, which is one of Trump's most recognised assets. The property's valuation was increased from $75 million to a range between $18 million and $27.6 million.

The former U.S. President, Donald Trump, reinforced his position, labelling the case presented by New York's chief legal officer, Letitia James, as an 'unjustified pursuit designed to sway an election.' This statement follows the deposition of a key expert witness who affirmed there wasn't any confirming evidence that the potential candidate for the 2024 elections had engaged in fraudulent actions.
The court heard from Eli Bartov, an esteemed professor of accounting at a prominent institution, New York University. He firmly communicated his expert opinion on Thursday, stating categorically that no discernible evidence exists to validate claims of any accounting malpractice on Trump's part.
Letitia James, a notable figure from the Democratic party who has actively pursued legal action against Trump as part of her campaign commitments, initiated a civil case. In her allegations, she stated that the former president, his offspring, and the corporate entity known as the Trump Organization had significantly embellished their asset figures in financial reports by a staggering number that reached into the billions.
A relevant case point was brought up by Justice Arthur Engoron, who presides over the Supreme Court's 1st Judicial District in New York. He swiftly escalated the discussion about James' debatable evaluation of the Mar-a-Lago property, which is one of Trump's most recognised assets. The property's valuation was increased from $75 million to a range between $18 million and $27.6 million.

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Real News Now Podcast

Real News Now Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

<a href="https://realnewsnow.com/">Real News Now</a> Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

Advertisement