The High Court of Minnesota has rendered a verdict, which might potentially hinder the intentions of Democratic party members and certain Republicans in Name Only (RINOs) to exclude ex-President Donald Trump from electoral consideration.

The judgement, refusing to bar the ex-president from the Republican primary ballot, might influence corresponding lawsuits in states including Colorado and Michigan, as featured on Fox News.

The plaintiffs in these legal battles are leveraging Clause 3 of the 14th Amendment. This amendment was instituted post the Civil War to deter erstwhile Confederates from achieving specific elected posts.

The goal here is to use this constitutional clause to prevent the ex-president from appearing on the ballot. This provision essentially restricts anyone who has shown themselves to be engaged in insurrection or rebellion after pledging to uphold the Constitution from holding any form of state or federal office, be it civil, military, legislative or executive.

Minnesota Supreme Court's Chief Justice Natalie Hudson noted in the ruling that there is no specific state law that prevents a major political party from endorsing a presidential nomination primary ballot candidate who is deemed unfit for office. It's also worth mentioning that the decision does not invalidate the chances of keeping the ex-president off the general election ballot.

The High Court of Minnesota has rendered a verdict, which might potentially hinder the intentions of Democratic party members and certain Republicans in Name Only (RINOs) to exclude ex-President Donald Trump from electoral consideration.
The judgement, refusing to bar the ex-president from the Republican primary ballot, might influence corresponding lawsuits in states including Colorado and Michigan, as featured on Fox News.
The plaintiffs in these legal battles are leveraging Clause 3 of the 14th Amendment. This amendment was instituted post the Civil War to deter erstwhile Confederates from achieving specific elected posts.
The goal here is to use this constitutional clause to prevent the ex-president from appearing on the ballot. This provision essentially restricts anyone who has shown themselves to be engaged in insurrection or rebellion after pledging to uphold the Constitution from holding any form of state or federal office, be it civil, military, legislative or executive.
Minnesota Supreme Court's Chief Justice Natalie Hudson noted in the ruling that there is no specific state law that prevents a major political party from endorsing a presidential nomination primary ballot candidate who is deemed unfit for office. It's also worth mentioning that the decision does not invalidate the chances of keeping the ex-president off the general election ballot.

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Real News Now Podcast

Real News Now Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

<a href="https://realnewsnow.com/">Real News Now</a> Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

Advertisement