Internationally respected law consultant Michael Conway, previously serving on the House Judiciary Committee, is advising an esteemed New York Judge, Arthur Engoron, to be cautious with his expressions and conduct during the ongoing trial of ex-President Donald Trump.

This case, a $250 million civil fraud lawsuit involving Trump, is often compared to the infamous 'Chicago 7' trial. Conway references this similarity to emphasize that it may be a deliberate strategy by Trump to agitate Engoron in a similar fashion as the defendants did to Judge Julius Hoffman in the 'Chicago 7' case, as there already appears to be evidence to support the plaintiff's fraud claim.

Writing for NBC's sister news organization MSNBC, Conway observed that Engoron frequently butts heads with not only Trump's legal squad but also the former president himself. He raised the point that the staunch language utilized by Engoron isn't necessarily an issue if its use can be justified, but in escalating the situation, there are potential risks.

Prominent among these is the possibility of an appellate court questioning his judgement, fueled by assertions from Trump's counsel asserting judicial bias evident from the judge's strong commentary.

Engoron's responses in the New York courtroom were robust when reviewing Trump's legal strategies, describing them as 'plain sophistry', 'laughable', 'spurious arguments', and 'severe' in his summary judgement.

Internationally respected law consultant Michael Conway, previously serving on the House Judiciary Committee, is advising an esteemed New York Judge, Arthur Engoron, to be cautious with his expressions and conduct during the ongoing trial of ex-President Donald Trump.
This case, a $250 million civil fraud lawsuit involving Trump, is often compared to the infamous 'Chicago 7' trial. Conway references this similarity to emphasize that it may be a deliberate strategy by Trump to agitate Engoron in a similar fashion as the defendants did to Judge Julius Hoffman in the 'Chicago 7' case, as there already appears to be evidence to support the plaintiff's fraud claim.
Writing for NBC's sister news organization MSNBC, Conway observed that Engoron frequently butts heads with not only Trump's legal squad but also the former president himself. He raised the point that the staunch language utilized by Engoron isn't necessarily an issue if its use can be justified, but in escalating the situation, there are potential risks.
Prominent among these is the possibility of an appellate court questioning his judgement, fueled by assertions from Trump's counsel asserting judicial bias evident from the judge's strong commentary.
Engoron's responses in the New York courtroom were robust when reviewing Trump's legal strategies, describing them as 'plain sophistry', 'laughable', 'spurious arguments', and 'severe' in his summary judgement.

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Real News Now Podcast

Real News Now Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

<a href="https://realnewsnow.com/">Real News Now</a> Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

Advertisement