Abbe Lowell, the legal representation for Hunter Biden, has communicated to both the House Oversight and House Judiciary Committees that his client, the President's son, is willing to respond to any future subpoena if it's distributed as part of a 'properly sanctioned impeachment inquiry'. He signaled this resolve during a recent meeting, promising his client's compliance should a proper hearing or deposition be requested.

This promise came forth from Lowell in response to a potential contempt of Congress citation against Hunter Biden. Earlier in the week, the committees formerly proposed this charge against Biden for ignoring previously delivered subpoenas. These had required his appearance for an in-camera deposition linked to the impeachment inquiry against his father, President Biden.

Lowell wrote to these committees, arguing that the original subpoenas lacked legal validity, as they were sent out prior to a formal vote in the House of Representatives, a vote which legitimized the impeachment probe against the President. His defense hinged on this technicality, claiming that the subpoenas were prematurely issued.

In his letter to the committees, he wrote, 'If you issue a new subpoena that adheres to legality, now that the impeachment inquiry has been authorized, my client will willingly comply for a hearing or deposition.' He went on to assert that they would positively receive such a subpoena on Hunter Biden's behalf.

Abbe Lowell, the legal representation for Hunter Biden, has communicated to both the House Oversight and House Judiciary Committees that his client, the President's son, is willing to respond to any future subpoena if it's distributed as part of a 'properly sanctioned impeachment inquiry'. He signaled this resolve during a recent meeting, promising his client's compliance should a proper hearing or deposition be requested.
This promise came forth from Lowell in response to a potential contempt of Congress citation against Hunter Biden. Earlier in the week, the committees formerly proposed this charge against Biden for ignoring previously delivered subpoenas. These had required his appearance for an in-camera deposition linked to the impeachment inquiry against his father, President Biden.
Lowell wrote to these committees, arguing that the original subpoenas lacked legal validity, as they were sent out prior to a formal vote in the House of Representatives, a vote which legitimized the impeachment probe against the President. His defense hinged on this technicality, claiming that the subpoenas were prematurely issued.
In his letter to the committees, he wrote, 'If you issue a new subpoena that adheres to legality, now that the impeachment inquiry has been authorized, my client will willingly comply for a hearing or deposition.' He went on to assert that they would positively receive such a subpoena on Hunter Biden's behalf.

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Real News Now Podcast

Real News Now Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

<a href="https://realnewsnow.com/">Real News Now</a> Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

Advertisement